Effects of single-dose zileuton on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids

Zileuton: clinical implications of 5-Lipoxygenase inhibition in severe airway disease

The 5-Lipoxygenase pathway results in the formation of leukotrienes, including leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4)), 5-oxo-6E,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetranoic acid and the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4)) and activates all four leukotriene receptors, BLT1, BLT2, cysLT(1) and cysLT(2). Zileuton is the only commercially available inhibitor of the 5-Lipoxygenase pathway. In a number of clinical trials, zileuton has been shown to improve airway function and inflammation, asthma symptom control and quality of life in asthmatics. Given the important role that leukotrienes play in airway inflammation, zileuton provides an additional therapeutic option in the management of chronic, persistent asthma, particularly those asthmatics with more severe disease. In addition, zileuton has shown promise in a number of other conditions, including upper airway inflammatory conditions, dermatological disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The development of new formulations, including a controlled release tablet formulation for b.i.d. dosing and an intravenous preparation for acute asthma exacerbations may enhance clinical utility and expand therapeutic indications.

Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma

Antileukotrienes are a relatively new class of anti-asthma drugs that either block leukotriene synthesis (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors) like zileuton, or antagonise the most relevant of their receptors (the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor [CysLT1]) like montelukast, zafirlukast or pranlukast. Hence, their major effect is an anti-inflammatory one. With the exception of pranlukast, the other antileukotrienes have been studied and marketed in the US and Europe for long enough to establish that they are useful drugs in the management of asthma. Their effects, significantly better than placebo, seem more pronounced in subjective measurements (i.e. symptoms scores or quality-of-life tests) than in objective parameters (i.e. forced expiratory volume in 1 second or peak expiratory flow rate). Also, there is some evidence that these drugs work better in some subsets of patients with certain genetic polymorphisms - probably related to their leukotriene metabolism - or patients with certain asthma characteristics. There are a small number of comparative studies only, and with regard to long-term asthma control differences between the agents have not been evaluated. Nevertheless, their overall effect appears comparable with sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) or theophylline, but significantly less than low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Antileukotrienes have been shown to have a degree of corticosteroid-sparing effect, but salmeterol appears to perform better as an add-on drug. Montelukast is probably the most useful antileukotriene for continuous treatment of exercise-induced asthma, performing as well as salmeterol without inducing any tolerance. All antileukotrienes are taken orally; their frequency of administration is quite different ranging from four times daily (zileuton) to once daily (montelukast). Antileukotrienes are well tolerated drugs, even though zileuton intake has been related to transitional liver enzyme elevations in some cases. Also Churg-Strauss syndrome (a systemic vasculitis), has been described in small numbers of patients taking CysLT1 antagonists. It is quite probable that this disease appears as a consequence of an 'unmasking' effect when corticosteroid dosages are reduced in patients with severe asthma once CysLT1 antagonists are introduced, but more data are needed to definitely establish the mechanism behind this effect. Overall, however, the benefits of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma greatly outweigh their risks.

A comparison of the pharmacological modulation of hyperalgesia and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

It has been proposed that there may be similarities in the mechanisms contributing toward hyperalgesia/allodynia observed in various clinical pain syndromes and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in asthma. Both features are characterized by an increase in responsivity to various stimuli. In the case of pain, these include increase in responsiveness to mechanical and thermal stimuli whilst asthmatics bronchoconstrict in response to substances that are otherwise innocuous. A variety of mediators can induce hyperalgesia and pain when injected into the skin and these same mediators are also released during an inflammatory insult in the airways and in many cases can induce hyperresponsiveness experimentally. In this review, a comparison of the pharmacological modulation of afferent activity in hyperalgesia and in BHR will be made to ascertain whether any commonality exists between the treatment of these two disease states.

Effect of inhaled indomethacin on distilled water-induced airway epithelial cell swelling

We evaluated the mechanism of the anti-asthmatic effect of inhaled indomethacin (Indo) by using an animal model (guinea pigs) of airway inflammation. After being exposed to either ozone or room air at identical flow rates (5 l/min) for 2 h, guinea pigs were anesthetized, tracheostomized, and lung resistance (RL) was subsequently measured. Guinea pigs inhaled either saline or Indo (1.5 mg/ml) for 1 min before undergoing an ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW) inhalation test. RL increased significantly after 10 min of UNDW inhalation in the room air and ozone groups but more so in the ozone group. This increase in RL was significantly suppressed by pretreatment with Indo. In the morphometric assessment of airway mucosa, a significant swelling of the epithelial cells after UNDW inhalation was observed in both the room air and ozone groups but especially so in the ozone group. This increase was also suppressed with Indo pretreatment. These results suggest that the increase in RL and the swelling of airway epithelial cells induced by inhaled UNDW in ozone-exposed guinea pigs was suppressed by pretreatment of inhaled Indo and that this suppression may be one of the reasons for the anti-asthmatic effect of inhaled Indo.

The anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene-modifying drugs and their use in asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. Anti-inflammatory drug therapy, primarily using corticosteroids, is now considered the first-line treatment in the management of all grades of asthma severity. Although corticosteroids are believed to be the most potent anti-inflammatory agents available, they do not suppress all inflammatory mediators involved in the asthmatic response. Leukotrienes, which are lipid mediators generated from the metabolism of arachidonic acid, play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. They produce bronchospasm, increase bronchial hyperresponsiveness, mucus production, and mucosal edema, and enhance airway smooth muscle cell proliferation and eosinophil recruitment into the airways, and their synthesis or release is unaffected by corticosteroid administration. The use of leukotriene synthesis inhibitors or leukotriene receptor antagonists as anti-inflammatory therapies in asthma has therefore been investigated. Beneficial effects of leukotriene-modifying drugs have been demonstrated in the management of all grades of asthma severity, and there is evidence that certain patient groups (such as those with exercise-induced asthma or aspirin-induced asthma) may be particularly suitable for such therapy.

The role of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the literature on the role of antileukotrienes (anti-LTs), specifically montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton, in the treatment of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant and appropriate controlled clinical studies were used. Only literature in the English language was reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Material was taken from academic/scholarly journals, appropriate reviews, and published abstracts.

RESULTS

In guidelines established by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, a stepwise approach to asthma management is recommended, with recommendations varying depending on degree of disease severity. The anti-LTs, the newest class of drugs for the treatment of asthma, play a circumscribed role in the guidelines as they were only recently available when the latest guidelines were published. Subsequently, however, extensive clinical experience with the anti-LTs has been amassed. Multiple clinical studies have demonstrated that the anti-LTs improve pulmonary function and quality of life, and reduce asthma symptoms, asthma exacerbations, and use of beta2-agonists and oral steroids. The anti-LTs may be particularly useful in asthma patients with aspirin sensitivity or concomitant allergic rhinitis, as well as in pediatric patients. These agents have additive effects with inhaled corticosteroids and may permit a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-LTs have several features that are likey to promote adherence to treatment and are generally well tolerated. The available clinical data suggest that anti-LTs should be considered as a therapeutic option or as additive therapy in patients with mild to severe asthma.

Antileukotrienes in asthma: present situation

Leukotrienes are key mediators in asthma. Over the last 5 years, several antileukotrienes, including three receptor antagonists (montelukast, pranlukast and zafirlukast) and one 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (zileuton), have been marketed and, to date, this class of drugs is being used widely. Still, their definite place in the asthma treatment algorithm is not yet established. These novel drugs have not yet all been evaluated in the same depth, but they have all been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties and to be effective in chronic asthma treatment. Zafirlukast and montelukast are particularly efficacious in exercise-induced asthma and zileuton appears valuable for treating aspirin-intolerant asthmatics. Clinical comparisons to other anti-asthma drugs are still sparse. The corticosteroid-sparing effect of antileukotrienes is fairly well established except for zileuton, even though this drug has been evaluated most thoroughly in terms of its anti-inflammatory effects. Montelukast is the antileukotriene most extensively evaluated in children and zafirlukast has recently been approved for use in children in the USA, although not yet in Europe. Therapeutic regimes are quite variable depending on the drug, but all of the antileukotrienes marketed to date are taken orally; hence, compliance is usually greater than that with inhaled medication. Response to antileukotrienes appears to depend on the individual patients' characteristics, in particular on genetic polymorphisms related to leukotriene metabolism. All drugs of this class are well tolerated and only in the case of zileuton is there potential for hepatic adverse effects. The diagnosis of Churg-Strauss syndrome made among patients taking antileukotrienes seems to be more related to the withdrawal of corticosteroids than to the antileukotrienes themselves.

Leukotriene modifiers in pediatric asthma management

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) are mediators released in asthma and virus-induced wheezing. Corticosteroids appear to have little or no effect on this release in vivo. Cys-LTs are both direct bronchoconstrictors and proinflammatory substances that mediate several steps in the pathophysiology of chronic asthma, including inflammatory cell recruitment, vascular leakage, and possibly airway remodeling. Blocking studies show that Cys-LTs are pivotal mediators in the pathophysiology of asthma. Cys-LTs are key components in the early and late allergic airway response and also contribute to bronchial obstruction after exercise and hyperventilation of cold, dry air in asthmatics. LT modifiers reduce airway eosinophil numbers and exhaled nitric oxide levels. Together these findings support an important role for the Cys-LTs in the asthma airway inflammation. Cys-LT receptor antagonists (Cys-LTRA) are generally well-tolerated. Phase III randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCT) show that LT modifiers are moderately effective, apparently with a particular between-patient variability in their clinical response. The clinical effects of LT modifiers are additive to those of beta-agonists and corticosteroids. The onset of action of LT modifiers is within 1 to several days, and not rapid enough to make them useful as rescue treatment. Although LT modifiers possess some antiinflammatory activity, they cannot substitute for corticosteroids for inflammation control. LT modifiers are alternatives to long-acting beta-agonists as complementary treatment to inhaled corticosteroids in pediatric asthma management because they provide bronchodilation and bronchoprotection without development of tolerance, and complement the antiinflammatory activity unchecked by steroids. In addition, the Cys-LTRA montelukast has been shown to ameliorate asthmatic symptoms and provide bronchoprotection in asthmatic preschool children from 2 years of age, which is of particular importance in this difficult-to-manage group of asthmatics. Given their efficacy, antiinflammatory activity, oral administration, and safety, LT modifiers will play an important role in the treatment of asthmatic children.

Serum ECP and MPO, but not urinary LTE4, are associated with bronchial hyper-responsiveness

A random population-based sample of 131 subjects was used to assess the value of serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), serum myeloperioxidase (MPO), and urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) in predicting bronchial hyper-responsiveness measured by methacholine challenge. Special interest was focused on the history of aspirin intolerance and on smoking as contributing factors. The mean serum ECP and MPO were higher in hyper-reactive [provocational dose causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec. (PD20) < or = 6900 micrograms] than in non-hyper-reactive subjects (22.3 vs. 13.2 micrograms l-1, P < 0.001 and 377 vs. 278 micrograms l-1, P = 0.001, respectively). This was also seen in current smokers vs. never smokers (17.2 vs. 12.9 micrograms l-1, P = 0.03 and 372 vs. 286 micrograms l-1, P = 0.04, respectively). There were no differences in baseline urinary excretion of LTE4 between hyper-reactive and non-hyper-reactive subjects. During the 2 h after methacholine challenge, urinary LTE4 excretion increased from 53.8 and 69.0 ng mmol-1 creatinine in non-hyper-reactive subjects, but there was no change in hyper-reactive subjects (non-hyper-reactive vs. hyper-reactive, P = 0.06). The increase was greatest in subjects with aspirin intolerance causing urticaria or angioedema but not aggravation of asthma (from 58.5 to 87.2 ng mmol-1 creatinine), probably due to extrapulmonary leukotriene production. Our results indicate that serum ECP and MPO, but not urinary LTE4 (even in subjects with a history of aspirin intolerance), predict bronchial hyper-responsiveness to methacholine. The subject's smoking history must be taken into account when these parameters are considered.

Leukotrienes, leukotriene receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors in asthma: an update. Part II: clinical studies with leukotriene receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors in asthma

The demonstration that leukotrienes, mainly cysteinyl leukotrienes, have biological properties relevant to the pathogenesis of asthma has stimulated the development of many therapeutic compounds to block these deleterious effects. Two main classes of leukotriene modulators have been developed: CysLT1 receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors. This article reviews the pharmacodynamics, the effects on baseline airway function, the protective effects in airway challenges as well as the results in chronic asthma of the different leukotriene modulators. In addition, the complementary anti-inflammatory effect of leukotriene modulators to that of corticosteroids and H1-histamine receptor antagonists is reviewed. Finally, a concise overview of the clinical responsiveness to this new class of drug, the safety and the drug interactions as well as the place in the strategies of treatment for asthmatic patients of the leukotriene modulators is also provided.