ERS statement on harmonised standards for lung cancer registration and lung cancer services in Europe

The Landsteiner lung cancer research platform (LALUCA) : Objectives, methodology and implementation of a real-world clinical lung cancer registry

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a major health burden in Austria; however, limited real-world data exist on the diagnostic and treatment reality of lung cancer patients in Austria. The collection of high-quality data in a clinical setting is needed to gain insights into the real-world diagnostic and therapeutic management of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

The Karl Landsteiner Institute for Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology implemented the Landsteiner lung cancer research platform (LALUCA), recruiting unselected lung cancer patients from two high volume centers in Vienna. This article describes the objectives, design, methodology of the registry and the process of implementation.

RESULTS

A multidisciplinary team of lung cancer specialists created a custom designed variable catalogue for the LALUCA platform consisting of 17 categories with 180 variables. Detailed information on clinical characteristics, diagnostic interventions, molecular pathology as well as curative and palliative treatment modalities are collected. During an implementation phase in 2020, the platform was optimized using the data of 50 patients. Since then a total of 1200 patients have been enrolled. Recruitment for the registry is ongoing with a recruitment rate of approximately 400 patients per year.

CONCLUSION

The LALUCA registry is a web-based platform for the collection of real-world clinical data of lung cancer patients. Combining a large number of patients with a focus on gathering comprehensive data on diagnosis and treatment, the LALUCA registry provides a tool for investigation, evaluation, and improvement of the clinical management, survival and quality of care of Austrian lung cancer patients.

European Respiratory Society guideline on various aspects of quality in lung cancer care

This European Respiratory Society guideline is dedicated to the provision of good quality recommendations in lung cancer care. All the clinical recommendations contained were based on a comprehensive systematic review and evidence syntheses based on eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions. The evidence was appraised in compliance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Evidence profiles and the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to summarise results and to make the decision-making process transparent. A multidisciplinary Task Force panel of lung cancer experts formulated and consented the clinical recommendations following thorough discussions of the systematic review results. In particular, we have made recommendations relating to the following quality improvement measures deemed applicable to routine lung cancer care: 1) avoidance of delay in the diagnostic and therapeutic period, 2) integration of multidisciplinary teams and multidisciplinary consultations, 3) implementation of and adherence to lung cancer guidelines, 4) benefit of higher institutional/individual volume and advanced specialisation in lung cancer surgery and other procedures, 5) need for pathological confirmation of lesions in patients with pulmonary lesions and suspected lung cancer, and histological subtyping and molecular characterisation for actionable targets or response to treatment of confirmed lung cancers, 6) added value of early integration of palliative care teams or specialists, 7) advantage of integrating specific quality improvement measures, and 8) benefit of using patient decision tools. These recommendations should be reconsidered and updated, as appropriate, as new evidence becomes available.

Trends in incidence and mortality of lung cancer in Switzerland: Possible explanations and open questions

BACKGROUND

Using US population-level data, it has been suggested that novel treatment advances, particularly targeted therapies, have contributed to a sharp fall in NSCLC mortality. Switzerland is a high-income country, with a universal, highly performant health care system, easy access to novel drugs but with different dynamics concerning the smoking epidemic than the US.

METHODS

We use population-based data from Swiss cancer registries to analyze the trends in incidence, mortality and survival and relate them to recent drug approvals.

RESULTS

The incidence of NSCLC and SCLC was stable from 1980 to 2018. We noted an important difference between sexes, with an important decrease in men and increase in women, especially for NSCLC. 1-y and 5-y survival have improved for NSCLC between 2004 and 2008 and 2014-2018.

CONCLUSION

These findings should be regarded as the results of a multifactorial improvement in care and it is difficult for us to pinpoint a unique cause explaining the reduction in mortality.

Surgery without preoperative histological confirmation of lung cancer: what is the current clinical practice?

Background

There are discordances in the guidelines regarding the need to acquire histological diagnosis before surgical treatment of (presumed) lung cancer. Preoperative histological confirmation is always encouraged in this setting to prevent unnecessary surgery or when sublobar resection for small-sized tumors is considered. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the proportion of patients undergoing lung cancer resection in the Netherlands without preoperative pathological confirmation, based on the intraoperative pathological diagnosis (IOD) rate, and to determine characteristics that may influence IOD frequency.

Methods

Data on 10,226 patients, who underwent surgical treatment for lung cancer from 2010 to 2015, were retrieved from the Netherlands National Cancer Registry. We registered an IOD when the date of diagnosis equaled the date of the first surgical intervention. Tabulations and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictive parameters for IOD.

Results

36% of surgical procedures were classified as IOD, and decreased with increasing tumor size and extent of surgery (57% for segmentectomy, 39% for lobectomy and 11% for pneumonectomy). IOD was more frequently observed in adenocarcinoma (41%), varied between hospitals from 13% to 66% and was less common when patients were referred from a hospital where thoracic surgery was not performed. Previous history of cancer did not affect IOD.

Conclusions

More than one-third of patients with suspected lung cancer in the Netherlands was operated without preoperative histological confirmation. There was significant variation in IOD rates between different hospitals, which deserves further detailed analysis when striving for uniform surgical quality of care for patients with lung cancer.

Quality of smoking cessation advice in guidelines of tobacco-related diseases: An updated systematic review

Tobacco smoking is a major risk factor for a wide range of diseases, and smoking cessation significantly reduces these risks. Clinical guidelines for diseases associated with smoking should therefore include guidance on smoking cessation. This review updated evidence on the proportion of clinical guidelines that do so. We conducted a systematic review investigating clinical guidelines and recommendations developed by UK national or European transnational medical specialty associations and societies between January 2014 and October 2019 on 16 diseases to be at least twice as common among smokers than non-smokers. Outcomes of interest were the reporting of smoking as a risk factor, and the inclusion either of smoking cessation advice or referral to other cessation guidance. We compared our findings with an earlier review of guidelines published between 2000 and 2013. We identified 159 clinical guidelines/recommendations. Over half (51%) made no mention of smoking, while 43% reported smoking as a risk factor for the development of the disease, 31% recommended smoking cessation and 19% provided detailed information on how to deliver smoking cessation support. These proportions were similar to those in our earlier review. Smoking cessation continues to be neglected in clinical management guidance for diseases caused by smoking.

European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Lung cancer

European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) are written by experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care in Europe. They give patients, health professionals, managers and policymakers a guide to essential care throughout the patient journey. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality and has a wide variation in treatment and outcomes in Europe. It is a major healthcare burden and has complex diagnosis and treatment challenges. Care must only be carried out in lung cancer units or centres that have a core multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an extended team of health professionals detailed here. Such units are far from universal in European countries. To meet European aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.

Patient perspectives and experience on the diagnostic pathway of lung cancer: A qualitative study

Objectives:

Lung cancer is one of the most common types of cancer, with high mortality rate and a significant burden of symptoms. It is therefore important to assess patients’ perceived quality of life during the diagnostic process and treatment. Knowledge of and attention to patients’ perspectives, experiences, and expectations in relation to lung cancer diagnostic pathways is limited. The aim of the study is to contribute with patients’ and relatives’ experiences with and their assessment of the quality of a hospital-based lung cancer diagnostic pathway.

Methods:

A qualitative study was conducted, comprising participant observation with 20 patients and semi-structured interviews with further 19 patients referred to the Lung Cancer Package, which initiates a fast track diagnostic pathway in a hospital setting. Data were obtained over a period of 9 months and analysed in collaboration with an interdisciplinary team of health professionals. The purpose was to further develop existing management strategies of the fast track diagnostic pathway based on patient’s perspectives.

Results:

Patients associated the fast track diagnostic pathway with high levels of anxiety due to the immediate risk of a lung cancer diagnosis. Although patients experienced the fast track programme as very challenging, they still wanted to move through the diagnostic pathway as quickly as possible. The patients expressed a need for support from relatives and repeatedly required information in multiple formats from health professionals throughout the diagnostic pathway.

Conclusions:

The study provided insight into the need for developing the fast track diagnostic pathway with a focus on patient anxiety, network involvement, and information strategies. The results qualified clinical practice with an increased focus on managing patients’ anxiety, raised awareness to involve relatives in the diagnostic process, and relaying information in dialogue with patients and their relatives, including management strategies to support patients through diagnostic investigations in the fast track programme.