Dual intracavitary therapy for pleural infections: leaving reluctance behind

Management of patient with Fusobacterim nucletum related pleural empyema: intrapleural antibiotic therapy can be considered for salvage therapy

Pleural empyema can lead to significant morbidity and mortality despite chest drainage and antibiotic treatment, necessitating novel and minimally invasive interventions. Fusobacterium nucleatum is an obligate anaerobe found in the human oral and gut microbiota. Advances in sequencing and puncture techniques have made it common to detect anaerobic bacteria in empyema cases. In this report, we describe the case of a 65-year-old man with hypertension who presented with a left-sided encapsulated pleural effusion. Initial fluid analysis using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) revealed the presence of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Aspergillus chevalieri. Unfortunately, the patient experienced worsening pleural effusion despite drainage and antimicrobial therapy. Ultimately, successful treatment was achieved through intrapleural metronidazole therapy in conjunction with systemic antibiotics. The present case showed that intrapleural antibiotic therapy is a promising measure for pleural empyema.

Causes, management and treatment of empyema

Infections in the pleural space have been a significant problem since ancient times and continue to be so today, with an incidence of 52% in patients with post-pneumonia syndrome. Typically, these effusions require a combination of medical treatment and surgical drainage, including debridement and decortication. Researchers have been studying the use of intrapleural fibrinolytics in managing complicated pleural effusions and empyema, but there is still ongoing debate and controversy among clinicians. Empyema has traditionally been considered a surgical disease, with antibiotics and chest tube drainage being the initial treatment modality. However, with advances in minimally invasive procedures such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and the use of intrapleural fibrinolytics, medical management is now preferred over surgery for many cases of empyema. Surgical options, such as open thoracotomy, are reserved for patients who fail conservative management and have complicated or chronic empyema. This comprehensive review aims to explore the evolution of various management strategies for pleural space infections from ancient times to the present day and how the shift from treating empyema as a surgical condition to a medical disease continues.

Nonmalignant Pleural Effusions

Although the potential causes of nonmalignant pleural effusions are many, the management of a few, including complicated pleural infections and refractory heart failure and hepatic hydrothoraces, can be challenging and requires the assistance of interventional pulmonologists. A pragmatic approach to complicated parapneumonic effusions or empyemas is the insertion of a small-bore chest tube (e.g., 14-16 Fr) through which fibrinolytics (e.g., urokinase and alteplase) and DNase are administered in combination. Therapeutic thoracenteses are usually reserved for small to moderate effusions that are expected to be completely aspirated at a single time, whereas video-assisted thoracic surgery should be considered after failure of intrapleural enzyme therapy. Refractory cardiac and liver-induced pleural effusions portend a poor prognosis. In cases of heart failure-related effusions, therapeutic thoracentesis is the first-line palliative therapy. However, if it is frequently needed, an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is recommended. In patients with hepatic hydrothorax, repeated therapeutic thoracenteses are commonly performed while a multidisciplinary decision on the most appropriate definitive management is taken. The percutaneous creation of a portosystemic shunt may be used as a bridge to liver transplantation or as a potential definitive therapy in nontransplant candidates. In general, an IPC should be avoided because of the high risk of complications, particularly infections, that may jeopardize candidacy for liver transplantation. Even so, in noncandidates for liver transplant or surgical correction of diaphragmatic defects, IPC is a therapeutic option as valid as serial thoracenteses.

From Chest Wall Resection to Medical Management: The Continued Saga of Parapneumonic Effusion Management and Future Directions

Pleural space infections have been described since the time of Hippocrates and to this day remains a significant pathology. Every year in the USA approximately there are one million hospital admissions for pneumonia with 20%-40% associated with some form of pleural space infections leading to pleural effusions with increased morbidity and mortality. Often, management of these effusions mandate combination of medical treatment and surgical drainage with debridement and decortication. There has been a lot of ongoing research regarding the safety and efficacy of intrapleural fibrinolytics in the management of complicated pleural effusions and empyema. Till this day, areas of debate and controversies exist among clinicians treating pleural space infection. Empyema is historically considered a surgical disease. There have been societies and guidelines for the management of infected parapneumonic effusions with antibiotics and chest tube drainage as an initial empiric treatment modality. With the advances in the use of Intrapleural fibrinolytics and minimally invasive procedures such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), empyema a surgical disease is now more favoring medical management. Surgical option, such as open thoracotomy, is reserved for patients who failed conservative management and chronic empyema. The aim of this comprehensive review is to shed light on the evolution of various management strategies from the era of Hippocrates to current day practice and how there continues to be a paradigm shift in treating empyema as a surgical condition to a medical disease.

Recent Insights into the Management of Pleural Infection

Pleural infection in adults has considerable morbidity and continues to be a life-threatening condition. The term “pleural infection” encompasses complicated parapneumonic effusions and primary pleural infections, and includes but is not limited to empyema, which refers to collection of pus in the pleural cavity. The incidence of pleural infection in adults has been continuously increasing over the past two decades, particularly in older adults, and most of such patients have comorbidities. Management of pleural infection requires prolonged duration of hospitalization (average 14 days). There are recognized differences in microbial etiology of pleural infection depending on whether the infection was acquired in the community or in a health-care setting. Anaerobic bacteria are acknowledged as a major cause of pleural infection, and thus anaerobic coverage in antibiotic regimens for pleural infection is mandatory. The key components of managing pleural infection are appropriate antimicrobial therapy and chest-tube drainage. In patients who fail medical therapy by manifesting persistent sepsis despite standard measures, surgical intervention to clear the infected space or intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (in poor surgical candidates) are recommended. Recent studies have explored the role of early intrapleural fibrinolytics or first-line surgery, but due to considerable costs of such interventions and the lack of convincing evidence of improved outcomes with early use, early intervention cannot be recommended, and further evidence is awaited from ongoing studies. Other areas of research include the role of routine molecular testing of infected pleural fluid in improving the rate of identification of causative organisms. Other research topics include the benefit of such interventions as medical thoracoscopy, high-volume pleural irrigation with saline/antiseptic solution, and repeated thoracentesis (as opposed to chest-tube drainage) in reducing morbidity and improving outcomes of pleural infection. This review summarizes current knowledge and practice in managing pleural infection and future research directions.