Inspiratory vocal cord closure in COPD

Living With Asthma and Vocal Cord Dysfunction/Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction: "I Just Can't Get Air In"

BACKGROUND

Asthma and vocal cord dysfunction (VCD), also known as inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO), may coexist, resulting in worse outcomes for patients. The experience of people with VCD/ILO and coexisting asthma is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether coexistent VCD/ILO and asthma have deleterious impacts on quality of life.

METHODS

We undertook a descriptive qualitative study using one-to-one semistructured interviews with 30 purposively recruited adult participants with a prior confirmed doctor asthma diagnosis and laryngoscopy-confirmed VCD/ILO. A thematic and content analysis was conducted to explore the data.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly female (63%), mean ± SD age 63 ± 12 years. Four themes were identified: trapped voice, altered life, knowledge about VCD/ILO, and looking for solutions. Participants reported their voice being trapped in their throat or the voice being suddenly cut off when talking or singing. Self-reported VCD/ILO symptoms including throat tightness and breathlessness were highlighted by participants. The second theme described how patients struggle to communicate or tended to shorten conversations. Insufficient knowledge and existing confusion regarding whether asthma was causing the breathlessness was described in the third theme. Looking for solutions depicted participants' diagnostic journey and how they sought an explanation for the symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

People with asthma and coexisting VCD/ILO experience a substantial burden affecting the quality of life. These data describe the impact on patients with coexisting conditions and should be used to increase clinician awareness of the experience of VCD/ILO from patients' perspectives to support a personalized approach to care.

Diagnosis of vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction: An International Delphi Consensus Study

BACKGROUND

Vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction (VCD/ILO) is characterized by breathing difficulties in association with excessive supraglottic or glottic laryngeal narrowing. The condition is common and can occur independently; however, it may also be comorbid with other disorders or mimic them. Presentations span multiple specialties and misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis is commonplace. Group-consensus methods can efficiently generate internationally accepted diagnostic criteria and descriptions to increase clinical recognition, enhance clinical service availability, and catalyze research.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to establish consensus-based diagnostic criteria and methods for VCD/ILO.

METHODS

We performed a modified 2-round Delphi study between December 7, 2021, and March 14, 2022. The study was registered at ANZCTR (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12621001520820p). In round 1, experts provided open-ended statements that were categorized, deduplicated, and amended for clarity. These were presented to experts for agreement ranking in round 2, with consensus defined as ≥70% agreement.

RESULTS

Both rounds were completed by 47 international experts. In round 1, 1102 qualitative responses were received. Of the 200 statements presented to experts across 2 rounds, 130 (65%) reached consensus. Results were discussed at 2 international subject-specific conferences in June 2022. Experts agreed on a diagnostic definition for VCD/ILO and endorsed the concept of VCD/ILO phenotypes and clinical descriptions. The panel agreed that laryngoscopy with provocation is the gold standard for diagnosis and that ≥50% laryngeal closure on inspiration or Maat grade ≥2 define abnormal laryngeal closure indicative of VCD/ILO.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study reached consensus on multiple aspects of VCD/ILO diagnosis and can inform clinical practice and facilitate research.

Vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction-2022 Melbourne Roundtable Report

Vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction (VCD/ILO), is a common condition characterized by breathlessness associated with inappropriate laryngeal narrowing. Important questions remain unresolved, and to improve collaboration and harmonization in the field, we convened an international Roundtable conference on VCD/ILO in Melbourne, Australia. The aims were to delineate a consistent approach to VCD/ILO diagnosis, appraise disease pathogenesis, outline current management and model(s) of care and identify key research questions. This report summarizes discussions, frames key questions and details recommendations. Participants discussed clinical, research and conceptual advances in the context of recent evidence. The condition presents in a heterogenous manner, and diagnosis is often delayed. Definitive diagnosis of VCD/ILO conventionally utilizes laryngoscopy demonstrating inspiratory vocal fold narrowing >50%. Computed tomography of the larynx is a new technology with potential for swift diagnosis that requires validation in clinical pathways. Disease pathogenesis and multimorbidity interactions are complex reflecting a multi-factorial, complex condition, with no single overarching disease mechanism. Currently there is no evidence-based standard of care since randomized trials for treatment are non-existent. Recent multidisciplinary models of care need to be clearly articulated and prospectively investigated. Patient impact and healthcare utilization can be formidable but have largely escaped inquiry and patient perspectives have not been explored. Roundtable participants expressed optimism as collective understanding of this complex condition evolves. The Melbourne VCD/ILO Roundtable 2022 identified clear priorities and future directions for this impactful condition.

Vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction: novel diagnostics and therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction (VCD/ILO) is an important medical condition but understanding of the condition is imperfect. It occurs in healthy people but often co-exists with asthma. Models of VCD/ILO pathophysiology highlight predisposing factors rather than specific mechanisms and disease expression varies between people, which is seldom appreciated. Diagnosis is often delayed, and the treatment is not evidence based.

AREAS COVERED

A unified pathophysiological model and disease phenotypes have been proposed. Diagnosis is conventionally made by laryngoscopy during inspiration with vocal cord narrowing >50% Recently, dynamic CT larynx was shown to have high specificity (>80%) with potential as a noninvasive, swift, and quantifiable diagnostic modality. Treatment entails laryngeal retraining with speech pathology intervention and experimental therapies such as botulinum toxin injection. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinics are a novel innovation with demonstrated benefits including accurate diagnosis, selection of appropriate treatment, and reductions in oral corticosteroid exposure.

EXPERT OPINION

Delayed diagnosis of VCD/ILO is pervasive, often leading to detrimental treatments. Phenotypes require validation and CT larynx can reduce the necessity for laryngoscopy, thereby fast-tracking diagnosis. MDT clinics can optimize management. Randomized controlled trials are essential to validate speech pathology intervention and other treatment modalities and to establish international standards of care.

Diagnosis of vocal cord dysfunction / inducible laryngeal obstruction-A Delphi study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Currently there is no consistent and widely accepted approach to the diagnosis of vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction (VCD/ILO). Harmonised diagnostic methods are vital to enable optimal diagnosis, advance management and enable research. We aim to obtain consensus on how expert clinicians recognise and diagnose VCD/ILO.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Two-round modified Delphi, with workshop validation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Institutional Board Review was obtained from the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee. The dissemination plan is for presentation and publication.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

Registered at Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001520820p.

Reliability of trans-laryngeal airway resistance measurements during maximal exercise

Objective

: Exercised induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) is an important cause of exertional dyspnea. The diagnosis rests on visual judgement of relative changes of the laryngeal inlet during continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) tests, but we lack objective measures that reflect functional consequences. We aimed to investigate repeatability and normal values of trans-laryngeal airway resistance measured at maximal intensity exercise.

Methods

: Thirty-one healthy non-smokers without exercise related breathing problems were recruited. Participants performed two CLE tests enabling verified positioning of two pressure sensors, one at the tip of the epiglottis (supraglottic) and one by the fifth tracheal ring (subglottic). Airway pressure and flow data were continuously collected breath-by-breath and used to calculate trans-laryngeal resistance at peak exercise. Laryngeal obstruction was assessed according to a standardised CLE-score system.

Results

: Data from 26 participants (16 females) with two successful tests and equal CLE scores on both test-sessions were included in the trans-laryngeal resistance repeatability analyses. The coefficient of repeatability (CR) was 0.62 cmH2O·L−1·s−1, corresponding to a CR% of 21%. Mean (sd) trans-laryngeal airway resistance (cmH2O·L−1·s−1) in participants with no laryngeal obstruction (n=15) was 2.88 (0.50) in females and 2.18 (0.50) in males. Higher CLE scores correlated with higher trans-laryngeal resistance in females (r=0.81, p<0.001).

Conclusions

: This study establishes trans-laryngeal airway resistance obtained during exercise as a reliable parameter in respiratory medicine, opening the door for more informed treatment decisions and future research on the role of the larynx in health and disease.

Factors Associated With Tolerance for In-Office Laryngeal Laser Procedures

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

A variety of laryngeal pathologies are increasingly being managed with in-office KTP laser (IOKTP) endoscopic procedures. The primary goal of this study was to identify patient characteristics and disease-related features that correlated with tolerance for IOKTP.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing office-based laryngeal laser procedures between November 2016 and December 2019 at a tertiary care center. Two blinded otolaryngologist reviewers scored videotaped recordings of IOKTP procedures and assessed severity and distribution of disease using a modified Derkay score, and evaluated procedure tolerance using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients who received IOKTP procedures for laryngeal pathology were reviewed, 42 male and 14 female, with a mean age of 61 years. Gender, age, and BMI were not correlated with tolerance. There was a moderate, negative correlation between tolerance and total number of pathological anatomic laryngeal subsites (rs(56) = -0.35, P = .01). There was a weak, negative correlation between tolerance and total modified Derkay score (rs(56) = -0.29, P = .03). The median tolerance score was lower for patients with posterior lesions (Mdn = 6.4) compared with patients with non-posterior lesions (Mdn = 7.4), P = .04, and lower for current or former smokers (Mdn = 6.5) compared with never smokers (Mdn = 7.3), P = .04.

CONCLUSION

Patients with large disease burden or posterior lesions and patients with smoking history may exhibit poorer tolerance of IOKTP procedures, factors which can help guide pre-procedural counseling and management decisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 131:E2292-E2297, 2021.