The development and validation of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire

Bronchiectasis Severity Index and FACED scores in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis complicating asthma: do they correlate with immunological severity or high-attenuation mucus?

Background: The utility of two disease-severity indices, namely bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) and FACED score in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) remains unknown.Objective: To correlate the BSI and FACED scores with immunological parameters (serum IgE [total and A. fumigatus-specific], A. fumigatus-specific IgG, blood eosinophil count), and high-attenuation mucus on chest computed tomography in ABPA. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the correlation between BSI and FACED scores and correlate the BSI/FACED scores with the bronchiectasis health questionnaire (BHQ) and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).Methods: We included treatment-naïve ABPA subjects with bronchiectasis in a prospective observational study. We computed the BSI and FACED scores for each subject before initiating treatment. The subjects also completed two quality-of-life questionnaires (BHQ and SGRQ).Results: We included 91 subjects. The mean (standard deviation) BSI and FACED scores were 3.43 (3.39) and 1.43 (1.27). We found no correlation between BSI or FACED with any immunological parameter or high-attenuation mucus. There was a strong correlation between BSI and FACED scores (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). We found a weak correlation between BSI and BHQ/SGRQ and FACED and SGRQ.Conclusion: We found no correlation between BSI and FACED with immunological parameters in ABPA. However, we found a significant correlation between BSI and FACED and a weak correlation between SGRQ and BHQ. ABPA likely requires a separate disease-severity scoring system.

Quality-of-Life Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale Predicts the Risk of Exacerbations in Adults with Bronchiectasis: A Prospective Observational Study

Rationale: The relationship between symptoms, measured using a validated disease-specific questionnaire, and longitudinal exacerbation risk has not been demonstrated in bronchiectasis. Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate whether baseline symptoms, assessed using the Quality-of-Life Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale (QoL-B-RSS) and its individual component scores, could predict future exacerbation risk in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: The study included 436 adults with bronchiectasis from three tertiary hospitals. Symptoms were measured using the QoL-B-RSS, with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicated more severe symptoms. We examined whether symptoms as continuous measures were associated with the risk of exacerbation over 12 months. The analysis was also repeated for individual components of the QoL-B-RSS score. Results: The baseline QoL-B-RSS score was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations (rate ratio, 1.25 for each 10-point decrease; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.35; P < 0.001), hospitalizations (rate ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05-1.43; P = 0.02), and reduced time to the first exacerbation (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21; P = 0.01) over 12 months, even after adjusting for relevant confounders, including exacerbation history. The QoL-B-RSS score was comparable to exacerbation history in its association with future frequent exacerbations (defined as three or more exacerbations per year) and hospitalization (area under the curve, 0.86 vs. 0.84; P = 0.46; and area under the curve, 0.81 vs. 0.83; P = 0.41, respectively). Moreover, patients with more severe symptoms in the majority of individual components of the QoL-B-RSS were more likely to experience exacerbations. Conclusions: Symptoms can serve as useful indicators for identifying patients at increased risk of exacerbation in bronchiectasis. Beyond relying solely on exacerbation history, a comprehensive assessment of symptoms could facilitate timely and cost-effective implementation of interventions for exacerbation prevention.

COPD Assessment Test and risk of readmission in patients with bronchiectasis: a prospective cohort study

Introduction

Readmission following bronchiectasis exacerbation is a common and challenging clinical problem and few simple predictive tools exist. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an easy-to-use questionnaire. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of CAT scores in determining the risk of readmission in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study in 106 bronchiectasis patients admitted with exacerbation. All patients completed the CAT at admission and at discharge. Patients were followed-up for 12 months to collect data on readmission. The area under the curve was used to measure the predictive value of CAT at admission, CAT at discharge and change in CAT for readmission due to bronchiectasis exacerbation.

Results

46 patients were readmitted for bronchiectasis exacerbation within 12 months. High CAT at admission was an independent risk factor for readmission within 12 months in patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis (hazard ratio 3.201, 95% CI 1.065-9.624; p<0.038) after adjustment for confounding variables. The cut-off value of CAT at admission and CAT at discharge to predict 12-month readmission in patients with acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis was 23.5 (sensitivity 62.2%, specificity 83.6%) and 15.5 (sensitivity 52.2%, specificity 87.0%).

Conclusions

CAT at admission is a strong predictor of readmission in patients with bronchiectasis exacerbation.

Bronchiectasis in renal transplant patients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a chronic airway disease characterized by permanent and irreversible abnormal dilatation of bronchi. Several studies have reported the development of bronchiectasis after renal transplantation (RT), but no prospective study specifically assessed bronchiectasis in this population. This study aimed to compare features of patients with bronchiectasis associated with RT to those with idiopathic bronchiectasis.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with bronchiectasis associated with RT (RT-B group) and 23 patients with idiopathic bronchiectasis (IB group) were prospectively included in this monocentric cross-sectional study. All patients underwent clinical, functional, laboratory, and CT scan assessments. Sputum was collected from 25 patients (n = 11 with RT-B and n = 14 with IB) and airway microbiota was analyzed using an extended microbiological culture.

RESULTS

Dyspnea (≥ 2 on mMRC scale), number of exacerbations, pulmonary function tests, total bronchiectasis score, severity and prognosis scores (FACED and E-FACED), and quality of life scores (SGRQ and MOS SF-36) were similar in the RT-B and IB groups. By contrast, chronic cough was less frequent in the RT-B group than in the IB group (68% vs. 96%, p = 0.03). The prevalence and diversity of the airway microbiota in sputum were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Clinical, functional, thoracic CT scan, and microbiological characteristics of bronchiectasis are overall similar in patients with IB and RT-B. These results highlight that in RT patients, chronic respiratory symptoms and/or airway infections should lead to consider the diagnosis of bronchiectasis. Further studies are required to better characterize the pathophysiology of RT-B including airway microbiota, its incidence, and impact on therapeutic management.

Outcomes of physiotherapy for people living with bronchiectasis: qualitative study to inform development of a core outcome set

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of the effectiveness of physiotherapy for bronchiectasis is inconsistent, partly due to variation in the selection and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. This qualitative study is a component of the development of a core outcome set (COS). The COS will identify a minimum group of outcomes for use in clinical trials of physiotherapy considering the views of researchers, patients, and clinicians.

OBJECTIVES

To identify outcomes for use in physiotherapy research that are important to patients and physiotherapists and to explain their significance.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adult patients with bronchiectasis who received physiotherapy, in addition to physiotherapists clinically involved in bronchiectasis care. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to identify, classify, and explain the significance of outcomes. Outcomes were mapped into the list created from literature review and classified into domains.

RESULTS

We interviewed 18 participants from four countries covering a range of experiences in different settings. Seventy outcomes were identified and grouped into 15 domains. Thirty-three outcomes were not previously reported in the literature. Thematic analysis revealed exacerbations, quality of life, use of healthcare resources, patient-reported symptoms, physical functioning, and sputum as the prominent themes reported by both patients and physiotherapists.

CONCLUSIONS

This qualitative study highlighted the importance of considering stakeholder perspectives when planning research trials. Outcomes identified will be used to inform the next phase of COS development.

REGISTRATION

This study is part of the COS development project registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative (COMET) https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1931 CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

The Bronchiectasis Exacerbation Diary: a novel patient-reported outcome for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is a chronic, progressive lung disease believed to result from a vicious cycle of infection and inflammation, with symptoms of chronic cough with sputum production, chronic fatigue, rhinosinusitis, chest pain, breathlessness and haemoptysis. There are currently no established instruments to monitor daily symptoms and exacerbations for use in clinical trials. Following a literature review and three expert clinician interviews, we conducted concept elicitation interviews with 20 patients with bronchiectasis to understand their personal disease experience. Findings from literature and clinician feedback were used to develop a draft version of the Bronchiectasis Exacerbation Diary (BED), which was designed to monitor key symptoms on a daily basis and during exacerbations. Patients were eligible to be interviewed if they were US residents aged ≥18 years, had a computed tomography scan-confirmed diagnosis of bronchiectasis with ≥two exacerbations in the previous 2 years and had no other uncontrolled respiratory conditions. Four waves of five patient interviews each were conducted. Patients (n=20) had a mean±_SD age of 53.9±12.8 years, and most were female (85%) and white (85%). A total of 33 symptoms and 23 impacts arose from the patient concept elicitation interviews. The BED was revised and finalised based upon patient feedback. The final BED is a novel, eight-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for monitoring key exacerbation symptoms on a daily basis with content validity established through comprehensive qualitative research and direct patient insight. The BED PRO development framework will be completed following psychometric evaluations of the data from a phase 3 bronchiectasis clinical trial.

Effectiveness of the use of an oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in bronchiectasis with frequent exacerbations: a single-arm pilot study

Impaired airway clearance in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis causes frequent bacterial infection, chronic inflammation, and progressive tissue destruction. We aimed to evaluate whether an oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) device could allow effective sputum expectoration and prevent acute exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis who had frequent acute exacerbations. This open-label, single-arm, prospective study included 17 patients who experienced three or more acute exacerbations in the past year. We evaluated the prevention of acute exacerbations, subjective symptom improvement, and change in sputum amount during the use of the Aerobika (Trudell Medical International, London, ON) OPEP device twice daily for 6  months. Of all enrolled patients, only two acute exacerbations occurred during the study period, indicating a significant decrease compared with the number of acute exacerbations before the device use (p < 0.001). Additionally, Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire score changed from 58.7 to 66.6, showing significant improvement over the treatment period (p < 0.001). The largest sputum volume was observed 3  months after OPEP device use (baseline: 10 ml, 3rd month 25 ml, p = 0.325). There were no major adverse events related to the use of OPEP devices. Twice-daily physiotherapy with OPEP device in patients with bronchiectasis who have frequent exacerbations may facilitate symptomatic improvement and prevention of acute exacerbations without serious adverse events.

Clinimetric Properties of Outcome Measures in Bronchiectasis

Rationale: There is a lack of outcome measures with robust clinimetric properties in bronchiectasis. Objectives: To determine the clinimetric properties (reliability over 1 year during clinical stability and responsiveness over the course of antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbation) of objective and patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included adults with bronchiectasis from seven hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants attended four visits, 4 months apart over 1 year while clinically stable and at the beginning and end of exacerbation and completed lung function (spirometry and multiple breath washout), provided a blood sample for C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement, and completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires (Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels). Results: Participants (n = 132) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 66 (11) years, and 64% were female. Lung function parameters (forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1], standard lung clearance index [LCI2.5]) were reliable over time [coefficient of variation (CV): <10%]). Regarding responsiveness, FEV1 demonstrated better properties than LCI2.5; therefore, a clear justification for the use of LCI2.5 in future trials is needed. CRP was less reliable (CV > 20%) over time than FEV1 and LCI2.5, and whereas CRP had a large mean change between the start and end of an exacerbation, this may have been driven by a small number of patients having a large change in CRP. Reliability of HRQoL questionnaires and questionnaire domains ranged from acceptable (CV: 20-30%) to good (CV: 10-20%), and HRQoL were responsive to treatment of exacerbations. Considering the specific questionnaire domain relevant to the intervention and its associated clinimetric properties is important. Additional statistics will support future power and/or sample size analysis. Conclusions: This information on the clinimetric properties of lung function parameters, CRP, and HRQoL parameters should be used to inform the choice of outcome measures used in future bronchiectasis trials.

Active cycle of breathing technique versus oscillating PEP therapy versus walking with huffing during an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a randomised, controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) for individuals with bronchiectasis are routinely prescribed in clinical practice and recommended by international guidelines, especially during an acute exacerbation. However, there is limited evidence of the efficacy of these techniques during an exacerbation to improve sputum expectoration, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) or exercise tolerance. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT), oscillating positive expiratory pressure (O-PEP) therapy, and walking with huffing on sputum expectoration for adults hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Secondary aims are to compare the effects of these interventions on HRQOL, health status, exacerbation rates and hospital admissions in a six-month period following hospital discharge.

METHODS

This multi-centre randomised controlled trial will recruit adults with an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis requiring hospital admission. Participants will be randomised to receive one of three interventions: ACBT, O-PEP therapy, and walking with huffing. Outcome measures including sputum volume during and 1-h post ACT session, and 24-h sputum, as well as health status, HRQOL and exercise capacity will be completed during inpatient stay on day 2 and day 6 of admission, and within 24 h of hospital discharge. Time to first exacerbation, and time to first hospitalisation will be monitored via monthly phone calls for six months post hospital discharge. Health status and HRQOL will be assessed after discharge at two and six months, and exercise capacity will be assessed at six months post hospital discharge.

DISCUSSION

Despite recommendations regarding the importance of ACT for individuals with bronchiectasis during an acute exacerbation, there is a gap in the literature regarding effectiveness of ACT when undertaken by individuals in this clinical state. This study will add to the evidence base regarding the effectiveness of commonly implemented ACTs during a hospital admission with an exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Additionally, it will contribute to knowledge of the long term effects on important and patient-centred outcomes, including incidence of future exacerbations, and HRQOL, which has not been previously established. Trial registration Registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000428864).

A study of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian...Portuguese version of Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a simple, repeatable, and self-reporting health status questionnaire for bronchiectasis. This study aims to cross-culturally adapt the BHQ into Brazilian Portuguese and evaluate its measurement properties.

METHODS

The participants answered the Saint George...s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale for dyspnea. The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ-Brazil) was used at baseline (test) and after 14 days (retest). The psychometric analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity: factorial validity, convergent validity, and discriminative validity, agreement, and ceiling and floor effects.

RESULTS

The BHQ-Brazil demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach...s alpha...=...0.92) and substantial reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient...=...0.86; 95%CI: 0.79...0.90). The exploratory factorial analysis was considered suitable. All items presented a factorial load >0.40. The convergent validity of the BHQ-Brazil with mMRC was moderate (r...=......0.53, p...<...0.001), while concurrent validity with the SGRQ was strong (symptoms: r...=......0.72, activities: r...=......0.60, impact: r...=......0.60, total score: r...=......0.75, all p...<...0.001). The standard error of measurement was 4.81 points. The discriminative validity demonstrated that individuals with more pulmonary exacerbations, colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, worst dyspnea, and a higher number of affected lung lobes presented the lowest quality of life. No floor or ceiling effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

The BHQ-Brazil presents adequate measurement properties to evaluate the impact of bronchiectasis on health-related quality of life, and can be used in clinical and research settings.

Impacts of Asthma in Patients With Bronchiectasis: Findings From the KMBARC Registry

PURPOSE

Although the coexistence of asthma and bronchiectasis is common, the impacts of asthma on bronchiectastic patients (BE) have not been well evaluated because this issue using bronchiectasis cohorts has been investigated in only a few studies.

METHODS

In the present study, 598 patients who were prospectively enrolled in the Korean bronchiectasis registry were evaluated. The clinical characteristics between BE with asthma and those without asthma were compared.

RESULTS

Asthma was found in 22.4% of BE. BE with asthma had a higher body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.020), more dyspnea (P < 0.001), larger sputum volume (P = 0.015), and lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (P < 0.001) than those without asthma. BE with asthma had a higher rate of previous pneumonia (P = 0.017) or measles (P = 0.037) than those without asthma. Regarding treatment, BE with asthma used inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting muscarinic antagonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists more frequently than those without asthma. Although intergroup differences were not observed in disease severity of bronchiectasis (P = 0.230 for Bronchiectasis Severity Index and P = 0.089 for FACED), the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) scores indicating the quality of life, were significantly lower in BE with asthma than in those without asthma (61.6 vs. 64.8, P < 0.001). In a multivariable model adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1 second %predicted, sputum volume, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale ≥ 2, and the number of involved lobes, asthma was associated with lower BHQ scores (β-coefficient = -2.579, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

BE with asthma have more respiratory symptoms, worse lung function, and poorer quality of life than those without asthma. A better understanding of the impacts of asthma in BE will guide appropriate management in this population.

Prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis and its relating factors in patients with bronchiectasis: findings from KMBARC registry

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with bronchiectasis often present with respiratory symptoms caused by chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, studies on the prevalence of CRS and its relationship with bronchiectasis are limited.

METHODS

The baseline characteristics of patients with bronchiectasis recruited from the Korean Multicenter Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration were analyzed. CRS diagnosis was determined by a physician, on the basis of medical records, upper airway symptoms, and/or radiologic abnormalities. Questionnaires for quality of life, fatigue, and depression were administered when patients were stable for a minimum of 4 weeks after the bronchiectasis exacerbation.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CRS was 7.1% (66/931). Patients with CRS were significantly younger than those without CRS (60.5 ± 10.7 years vs. 64.6 ± 9.3 years, p = 0.001). Idiopathic bronchiectasis was more common in patients with CRS compared to those without CRS (53.0% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.006). Lung function, inflammatory markers, exacerbations, bronchiectasis severity, and scores for quality of life, fatigue, and depression did not differ between the two groups. In a logistic regression analysis, CRS was associated with age of bronchiectasis diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 0.99; p = 0.003) and idiopathic bronchiectasis (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.34; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CRS was relatively low. CRS was not associated with the severity or clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis. Early diagnosis and idiopathic etiology were associated with CRS. Our findings reflect the low recognition of CRS in the clinical practice of bronchiectasis and highlight the need for awareness of CRS by adopting objective diagnostic criteria.

Psychometric Validation of the German Translation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B)-Data from the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS

Patients with bronchiectasis feature considerable symptom burden and reduced health-related quality of life (QOL). We provide the psychometric validation of the German translation of the disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B), version 3.1, using baseline data of adults consecutively enrolled into the prospective German bronchiectasis registry PROGNOSIS. Overall, 904 patients with evaluable QOL-B scores were included. We observed no relevant floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was good to excellent (Cronbach’s α ≥0.73 for each scale). QOL-B scales discriminated between patients based on prior pulmonary exacerbations and hospitalizations, breathlessness, bronchiectasis severity index, lung function, sputum volume, Pseudomonas aeruginosa status and the need for regular pharmacotherapy, except for Social Functioning, Vitality and Emotional Functioning scales. We observed moderate to strong convergence between several measures of disease severity and QOL-B scales, except for Social and Emotional Functioning. Two-week test-retest reliability was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.84 for each scale. Minimal clinical important difference ranged between 8.5 for the Respiratory Symptoms and 14.1 points for the Social Functioning scale. Overall, the German translation of the QOL-B, version 3.1, has good validity and test-retest reliability among a nationally representative adult bronchiectasis cohort. However, responsiveness of QOL-B scales require further investigation during registry follow-up.

Safety and tolerability of inhaled antibiotics in patients with bronchiectasis

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiectasis is typically treated with inhaled antibiotics in clinical practice. However, there is a striking lack of standardised procedures for the preparation of noncommercial solutions. We used biochemical parameters to analyse the safety and tolerability of inhaled antibiotics in patients with bronchiectasis, and determined potential associations between the inhaled antibiotics used and adherence to the medications and quality of life.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review, biochemical testing, and a pilot study of patients admitted to our hospital with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. The MEDLINE database was searched for studies involving inhaled antibiotics to treat bronchiectasis. We analysed the pH, osmolality, and sodium and chloride ion concentrations of the antibiotics used. The pilot study included patients receiving inhaled antibiotic treatment. Demographic data, adherence, and quality of life were recorded and assessed. We determined potential associations between the study variables.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 429 articles: 106 included precise instructions for diluting antibiotics, and 18 reported data on the biochemical parameters analysed. Laboratory results showed that some antibiotic dilutions were outside the range of tolerability, especially those involving dry powders for intravenous infusion, which must be diluted for their inhalation. Adherence was good in more than 80% of the patients, and higher in men and older patients. Men reported better quality of life. No associations were found between the antibiotics used and the other variables.

CONCLUSION

Regarding the biochemical parameters analysed, there is a lack of information on the tolerability and biochemical safety of noncommercial dilutions of inhaled antibiotics used to treat bronchiectasis.

The Establishment of China Bronchiectasis Registry and Research Collaboration (BE-China): Protocol of a prospective multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a highly heterogeneous chronic airway disease with marked geographic and ethnic variations. Most influential cohort studies to date have been performed in Europe and USA, which serve as the examples for developing a cohort study in China where there is a high burden of bronchiectasis. The Establishment of China Bronchiectasis Registry and Research Collaboration (BE-China) is designed to: (1) describe the clinical characteristics and natural history of bronchiectasis in China and identify the differences of bronchiectasis between the western countries and China; (2) identify the risk factors associated with disease progression in Chinese population; (3) elucidate the phenotype and endotype of bronchiectasis by integrating the genome, microbiome, proteome, and transcriptome with detailed clinical data; (4) facilitate large randomized controlled trials in China.

METHODS

The BE-China is an ongoing prospective, longitudinal, multi-center, observational cohort study aiming to recruit a minimum of 10,000 patients, which was initiated in January 2020 in China. Comprehensive data, including medical history, aetiological testing, lung function, microbiological profiles, radiological scores, comorbidities, mental status, and quality of life (QoL), will be collected at baseline. Patients will be followed up annually for up to 10 years to record longitudinal data on outcomes, treatment patterns and QoL. Biospecimens, if possible, will be collected and stored at - 80 °C for further research. Up to October 2021, the BE-China has enrolled 3758 patients, and collected 666 blood samples and 196 sputum samples from 91 medical centers. The study protocol has been approved by the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital ethics committee, and all collaborating centers have received approvals from their local ethics committee. All patients will be required to provide written informed consent to their participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of the BE-China will be crucial to reveal the clinical characteristics and natural history of bronchiectasis and facilitate evidence-based clinical practice in China. Trial registration Registration Number in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03643653.

Telemedicine and Remote Monitoring as an Adjunct to Medical Management of Bronchiectasis

The limited resources and the practice of social distancing during the COVID pandemic create a paradigm shift in the utilization of telemedicine in healthcare. However, the implementation of best practices is hampered in part by a lack of literature devoted to telehealth in bronchiectasis. In this commentary, we examine multiple approaches to structuring of telemedicine care for patients with bronchiectasis, highlight current evidence-based interventions that can be incorporated into the management of bronchiectasis, and describe our experience with telemedicine at the University of Connecticut Center for Bronchiectasis Care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The structural model must be adapted to different local dynamics and available technologies with careful attention to patient characteristics and access to technology to avoid the potential paradoxical effects of increasing patients’ burden and healthcare disparities in underserved populations.

Functional impairment in bronchiectasis: Spirometry parameters versus St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores: Any co-relation?

OBJECTIVES

Bronchiectasis is a common respiratory disease which has significant morbidity and mortality. Health-related quality of life scores are not routinely used for the assessment of bronchiectasis. The present study was undertaken with an aim to assess the clinical profile and functional impairment using spirometry in patients with bronchiectasis and to co-relate functional impairment with their St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score.

METHODOLOGY

This was a cross-sectional study carried out on 102 patients of bronchiectasis. All patients were assessed for clinical profile, spirometry, and SGRQ scores. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC were measured and compared with SGRQ scores. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0 and MS-Excel.

RESULTS

Obstruction was found in 62.7% and significant bronchodilator reversibility was observed in 30.4%. All spirometry parameters individually and combined showed a negative co-relation which was stastically significant (P < 0.001). Best co-relation was with FEV1 r = -0.809; symptom score, r = -0.821; activity score, r= -0.849; impact score and r = -0.873 total score. FVC% versus symptoms score r = -0.735; activity score r = -0.729, impacts score r = -0.778; total score r = -0.792. FEV1/FVC versus symptoms score r = -0.227, activity score r = -0.278, impacts score r = -0.263, total score r = -0.274.

CONCLUSION

SGRQ scores have shown good correlation with functional impairment. It can be used as a modality to evaluate health status of patient in resource constraint settings.

Heterogeneity of treatment response in bronchiectasis clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Recent randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in Bronchiectasis have failed to reach their primary endpoints, suggesting a need to reassess how we measure treatment response. Exacerbations, quality of life (QOL) and lung function are the most common endpoints evaluated in bronchiectasis clinical trials. We aimed to determine the relationship between responses in terms of reduced exacerbations, improved symptoms and lung function in bronchiectasis.

METHODS

We evaluated treatment response in 3 RCTs that evaluated mucoactive therapy (inhaled Mannitol), an oral anti-inflammatory/antibiotic (Azithromycin) and an inhaled antibiotic (Aztreonam). Treatment response was defined by absence of exacerbations during follow-up, an improvement of QOL above the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and an improvement in FEV₁ of ≥100 mL from baseline.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cumulatively the three trials included 984 patients. Changes in FEV₁, QOL and exacerbations were heterogeneous in all trials analysed. Improvements in QOL were not correlated to changes in FEV₁ in the azithromycin and aztreonam trials (r=-0.17, p=0.1 and r=0.04, p=0.4) and weakly correlated in the mannitol trial (r=0.22, p<0.0001). An important placebo effect was observed in all trials, especially regarding improvements in QOL. Clinical meaningful lung function improvements were rare across all trials evaluated, suggesting that FEV₁ is not a responsive measure in bronchiectasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in lung function, symptoms and exacerbation frequency are dissociated in bronchiectasis. FEV₁ is poorly responsive and poorly correlated with other key outcome measures. Clinical parameters are poorly predictive of treatment response suggesting the need to develop biomarkers to identify responders.

Prevalence of depression and its associated factors in bronchiectasis: findings from KMBARC registry

BACKGROUND

With the emergence of bronchiectasis as a common respiratory disease, epidemiological data have accumulated. However, the prevalence and impact of psychological comorbidities were not sufficiently evaluated. The present study examined the prevalence of depression and its associated factors in patients with bronchiectasis.

METHODS

This study involved a multicenter cohort of bronchiectasis patients recruited from 33 pulmonary specialist hospitals. The baseline characteristics and bronchiectasis-related factors at enrollment were analyzed. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

RESULTS

Of the 810 patients enrolled in the study, 168 (20.7%) patients had relevant depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10), and only 20 (11.9%) patients had a diagnosis of depression. Significant differences were noted in the depressive symptoms with disease severity, which was assessed using the Bronchiectasis Severity Index and E-FACED (all p < 0.001). Depressive symptoms inversely correlated with quality-of-life (r = - 0.704, p < 0.001) and positively correlated with fatigue severity score (r = 0.712, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that depression was significantly associated with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale ≥ 2 (OR 2.960, 95% CI 1.907-4.588, p =  < 0.001) and high number of exacerbations (≥ 3) in the previous year (OR 1.596, 95% CI 1.012-2.482, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Depression is common, but its association with bronchiectasis was underrecognized. It negatively affected quality-of-life and presented with fatigue symptoms. Among the bronchiectasis-related factors, dyspnea and exacerbation were closely associated with depression. Therefore, active screening for depression is necessary to optimize the treatment of bronchiectasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea (KCT0003088). The date of registration was June 19th, 2018.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Is Associated With Decreased Quality of Life in Bronchiectasis Patients: Findings From the KMBARC Registry

Most studies have evaluated the impact of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (hereafter referred to as bronchiectasis) on quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using COPD cohorts. Accordingly, the impact of COPD on QoL in patients with bronchiectasis is not well-elucidated. We used the Korean Multicenter Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (KMBARC) registry between August 2018 and December 2019, a prospective observational cohort that enrolled patients with bronchiectasis in Korea. We evaluated co-occurrence exposure to COPD in bronchiectasis patients, and the primary outcome was QoL according to the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ). We also investigated factors associated with decreased QoL, defined as the lowest quartile of the total BHQ score. Of 598 patients with bronchiectasis, 372 (62.2%) had COPD. Bronchiectasis patients with COPD had a significantly lower total BHQ score compared with those without COPD [median = 63.1 (interquartile range: 54.8–68.6) vs. 64.8 (57.4–70.8), p = 0.020]. Multivariable analysis revealed that dyspnea [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21–8.60], depression (aOR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.16–1.44), and fatigue (aOR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01–1.09) were significantly associated with decreased QoL in bronchiectasis patients with COPD. In conclusion, bronchiectasis patients with COPD had significantly decreased QoL than patients without COPD. In bronchiectasis patients with COPD, dyspnea, depression, and fatigue were associated with decreased QoL.

Validation of the Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM): a novel patient-reported outcome measure

INTRODUCTION

Existing quality-of-life and symptom tools used in bronchiectasis trials are either not disease specific or are complex and have not been consistently responsive. We developed a simple patient-reported visual analogue outcome measure, the Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM), for use in clinical research, including clinical trials.

METHODS

Patients with bronchiectasis attending a tertiary referral clinic in the east of Scotland were invited to complete the BIM questionnaire and the quality-of-life bronchiectasis questionnaire at baseline with repeat questionnaires after 2 weeks and 6 months. We assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness by evaluating change during an acute exacerbation.

RESULTS

173 patients were included. The eight domains (cough, sputum, breathlessness, tiredness, activity, general health, control, exacerbations) showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.93). The intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated excellent reliability over a 2-week period: cough (0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.85), sputum (0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.90), dyspnoea (0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), tiredness (0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.91), activity (0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.89), general health (0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), control (0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) and exacerbation (0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.79). Domains correlated strongly with bronchiectasis severity and exacerbation history. Both distribution and patient-based methods estimated the minimal clinically important difference for each domain as 1.5 points on a 10-point scale. Statistically significant changes in all BIM domains were observed during an acute exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

The BIM is a simple patient-reported outcome. This study validates the internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and response of the tool at acute exacerbation. Further validation of the tool is now required.

Exercise training for bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is characterised by excessive sputum production, chronic cough, and acute exacerbations and is associated with symptoms of dyspnoea and fatigue, which reduce exercise tolerance and impair quality of life. Exercise training in isolation or in conjunction with other interventions is beneficial for people with other respiratory diseases, but its effects in bronchiectasis have not been well established.

OBJECTIVES

To determine effects of exercise training compared to usual care on exercise tolerance (primary outcome), quality of life (primary outcome), incidence of acute exacerbation and hospitalisation, respiratory and mental health symptoms, physical function, mortality, and adverse events in people with stable or acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Specialised Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization trials portal, from their inception to October 2020. We reviewed respiratory conference abstracts and reference lists of all primary studies and review articles for additional references.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials in which exercise training of at least four weeks' duration (or eight sessions) was compared to usual care for people with stable bronchiectasis or experiencing an acute exacerbation. Co-interventions with exercise training including education, respiratory muscle training, and airway clearance therapy were permitted if also applied as part of usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened and selected trials for inclusion, extracted outcome data, and assessed risk of bias. We contacted study authors for missing data. We calculated mean differences (MDs) using a random-effects model. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six studies, two of which were published as abstracts, with a total of 275 participants. Five studies were undertaken with people with clinically stable bronchiectasis, and one pilot study was undertaken post acute exacerbation. All studies included co-interventions such as instructions for airway clearance therapy and/or breathing strategies, provision of an educational booklet, and delivery of educational sessions. The duration of training ranged from six to eight weeks, with a mix of supervised and unsupervised sessions conducted in the outpatient or home setting. No studies of children were included in the review; however we identified two studies as currently ongoing. No data were available regarding physical activity levels or adverse events. For people with stable bronchiectasis, evidence suggests that exercise training compared to usual care improves functional exercise tolerance as measured by the incremental shuttle walk distance, with a mean difference (MD) between groups of 87 metres (95% confidence interval (CI) 43 to 132 metres; 4 studies, 161 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence also suggests that exercise training improves six-minute walk distance (6MWD) (MD between groups of 42 metres, 95% CI 22 to 62; 1 study, 76 participants; low-certainty evidence). The magnitude of these observed mean changes appears clinically relevant as they exceed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds for people with chronic lung disease. Evidence suggests that quality of life improves following exercise training according to St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (MD -9.62 points, 95% CI -15.67 to -3.56 points; 3 studies, 160 participants; low-certainty evidence), which exceeds the MCID of 4 points for this outcome. A reduction in dyspnoea (MD 1.0 points, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.53; 1 study, 76 participants) and fatigue (MD 1.51 points, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.22 points; 1 study, 76 participants) was observed following exercise training according to these domains of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. However, there was no change in cough-related quality of life as measured by the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) (MD -0.09 points, 95% CI -0.98 to 0.80 points; 2 studies, 103 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), nor in anxiety or depression. Two studies reported longer-term outcomes up to 12 months after intervention completion; however exercise training did not appear to improve exercise capacity or quality of life more than usual care. Exercise training reduced the number of acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis over 12 months in people with stable bronchiectasis (odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.81; 1 study, 55 participants). After an acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis, data from a single study (N = 27) suggest that exercise training compared to usual care confers little to no effect on exercise capacity (MD 11 metres, 95% CI -27 to 49 metres; low-certainty evidence), SGRQ total score (MD 6.34 points, 95%CI -17.08 to 29.76 points), or LCQ score (MD -0.08 points, 95% CI -0.94 to 0.78 points; low-certainty evidence) and does not reduce the time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.22).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides low-certainty evidence suggesting improvement in functional exercise capacity and quality of life immediately following exercise training in people with stable bronchiectasis; however the effects of exercise training on cough-related quality of life and psychological symptoms appear to be minimal. Due to inadequate reporting of methods, small study numbers, and variation between study findings, evidence is of very low to moderate certainty. Limited evidence is available to show longer-term effects of exercise training on these outcomes.

Personalized approaches to bronchiectasis

Introduction: Interest in bronchiectasis is increasing due to its rising prevalence, associated with aging populations and the extended use of high-resolution chest tomography (HRCT), and the resulting high morbidity, mortality, and demand for resources.Areas covered: This article provides an extensive review of bronchiectasis as a complex and heterogeneous disease, as well as examining the difficulty of establishing useful clinical phenotypes. In keeping with the aims of 'precision medicine', we address the disease of bronchiectasis from three specific perspectives: severity, activity, and impact. We used PubMed to search the literature for articles including the following keywords: personalized medicine, bronchiectasis, biomarkers, phenotypes, precision medicine, treatable traits. We reviewed the most relevant articles published over the last 5 years.Expert opinion: This article reflects on the usefulness of these three dimensions in 'control panels' and clinical fingerprinting, as well as approaches to personalized medicine and the treatable features of bronchiectasis non-cystic fibrosis.

Changes in respiratory symptoms during 48-week treatment with ARD-3150 (inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin) in bronchiectasis: results from the ORBIT-3 and -4 studies

It is not known if inhaled antibiotics improve respiratory symptoms in patients with bronchiectasis. In the recent phase-3 ORBIT trials, 48 weeks' treatment with ARD-3150 (inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin) did not significantly improve symptoms using the prespecified method of analysis comparing baseline symptoms to those after 48 weeks, when patients had been off treatment for 28 days. This method of analysis does not take account of possible improvements in symptoms while on active treatment.A post hoc analysis of two identical randomised trials of ARD-3150 (ORBIT-3 and -4) administered 28 days on and 28 days off in patients with bronchiectasis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. The quality-of-life bronchiectasis respiratory symptom scale (QOL-B-RSS), which has a one-week recall period, was administered every 28 days. We examined whether respiratory symptoms improved during on-treatment periods and the relationship of changes in QOL-B-RSS to changes in bacterial load using a mixed-model repeated measures approach.ARD-3150 treatment resulted in a significant improvement in respiratory symptoms during the on-treatment periods with concordant results between ORBIT-3 (estimate 1.4 points, se 0.49; p=0.004) and ORBIT-4 (estimate 1.1 point, se 0.41; p=0.006). The proportion of patients achieving a symptom improvement above the minimum clinically important difference was higher with ARD-3150 compared with placebo during on-treatment cycles (p=0.024). Changes in respiratory symptoms were correlated with changes in bacterial load in the treatment group (r=-0.89, p<0.0001). Individual estimates for decrements in the QOL-B RSS during exacerbation were -9.4 points (se 0.91) in ORBIT-3 and -10.8 points (0.74) in ORBIT-4 (both p<0.0001).Inhaled ARD-3150 resulted in significant improvements in respiratory symptoms during the on-treatment periods which were lost during off-treatment periods. These results supports the concept that reducing bacterial load can improve respiratory symptoms in patients with bronchiectasis.

Relationship between Symptoms, Exacerbations, and Treatment Response in Bronchiectasis

Rationale: Bronchiectasis guidelines regard treatment to prevent exacerbation and treatment of daily symptoms as separate objectives.Objectives: We hypothesized that patients with greater symptoms would be at higher risk of exacerbations and therefore that a treatment aimed at reducing daily symptoms would also reduce exacerbations in highly symptomatic patients.Methods: Our study comprised an observational cohort of 333 patients from the East of Scotland (2012-2016). Either symptoms were modeled as a continuous variable or patients were classified as having high, moderate, or low symptom burden (>70, 40-70, and <40 using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire symptom score). The hypothesis that exacerbation reductions would only be evident in highly symptomatic patients was tested in a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial of inhaled dry powder mannitol (N = 461 patients).Measurements and Main Results: In the observational cohort, daily symptoms were a significant predictor of future exacerbations (rate ratio [RR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.17; P = 0.005). Patients with higher symptom scores had higher exacerbation rates (RR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.12-2.72; P = 0.01) over 12-month follow-up than those with lower symptoms. Inhaled mannitol treatment improved the time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.77; P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients remaining exacerbation free for 12 months of treatment was higher in the mannitol group (32.7% vs. 14.6%; RR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.40-5.76; P = 0.003), but only in highly symptomatic patients. In contrast, no benefit was evident in patients with lower symptom burden.Conclusions: Highly symptomatic patients have increased risk of exacerbations, and exacerbation benefit with inhaled mannitol was only evident in patients with high symptom burden.

Validation of the Korean Version of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a simple and repeatable, self-reporting health status questionnaire for bronchiectasis. We have translated the original version of the BHQ into Korean using a standardized methodology. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the BHQ (K-BHQ) with Korean patients.

METHODS

Stable state patients with bronchiectasis from two academic hospitals were enrolled in this study. The validity was assessed by investigating the relationship between the K-BHQ scores and the Korean version of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (K-CAT) scores. We also investigated the relationship between the K-BHQ scores and other variables of the modified Medical Research Council's (mMRC) dyspnea scale, lung function, and exacerbations.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients with bronchiectasis were enrolled. The mean age was 64.3 (standard deviation [SD], 9.7). Women comprised 53.2% of the patients. The mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 60% of the predicted value (SD, 18.9%); the mean K-CAT score was 17.6 (SD, 9.1). The K-BHQ scores correlated strongly with the K-CAT scores (r=-0.656, p<0.001). There was significant correlation between the K-BHQ scores and the mMRC dyspnea scale (ρ=-0.409, p<0.001), FEV1 (r=0.406, p<0.001), and number of exacerbations requiring hospitalization (ρ=-0.303, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The K-BHQ is valid for assessing the health-related quality of life or health status of Korean bronchiectasis patients.

Measuring airway clearance outcomes in bronchiectasis: a review

While airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are recommended for individuals with bronchiectasis, many trials have demonstrated inconsistent benefits or failed to reach their primary outcome. This review determined the most common clinical and patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of ACTs in bronchiectasis. A literature search of five databases using relevant keywords and filtering for studies published in English, up until the end of August 2019, was completed. Studies included randomised controlled trials, using crossover or any other trial design, and abstracts. Studies were included where the control was placebo, no intervention, standard care, usual care or an active comparator. Adults with bronchiectasis not related to cystic fibrosis were included. Extracted data comprised study authors, design, duration, intervention, outcome measures and results. The search identified 27 published studies and one abstract. The most common clinical outcome measures were sputum volume (n=23), lung function (n=17) and pulse oximetry (n=9). The most common patient-reported outcomes were health-related quality of life (measured with St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, n=4), cough-related quality of life (measured with Leicester Cough Questionnaire, n=4) and dyspnoea (measured with Borg/modified Borg scale, n=8). Sputum volume, lung function, dyspnoea and health- and cough-related quality of life appear to be the most common clinical and patient-reported measures of airway clearance treatment efficacy.

Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis: a study of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

SUBJECTS

Clinically stable individuals with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis.

MEASURES

The evaluations performed were spirometry, incremental shuttle walk test, Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale. The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis was administered twice (seven to 14 days apart). Psychometric analyses were performed as follows: reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and interpretability.

RESULTS

In total, 108 individuals (48 ± 14 years, 61 women) participated in the study. Internal consistency was considered adequate (Cronbach's alpha ⩾ 0.70) for the majority of scales (from 0.58 to 0.93). Test-retest coefficients were moderate to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients from 0.70 to 0.93). In the construct validity, 35 of 37 items correlated more strongly with their assigned scale than a competing scale. The convergent validity showed significant correlations between scales of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis with modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, and incremental shuttle walk test (r from 0.20 to 0.59). A low to moderate correlations was revealed between all scales of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis and the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire domains (r from 0.26 to 0.70). The standard error of measurement was acceptable. Ceiling effects were found for the Social Functioning and Treatment Burden scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis is a reliable, valid instrument with adequate internal consistency for the evaluation of the impact of bronchiectasis on the health-related quality of life of Brazilian adults.

Effectiveness of two high frequency chest wall oscillation techniques in patients with bronchiectasis: a randomized controlled preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Chest physiotherapy is an important tool in the treatment of bronchiectasis. High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is a technique designed to create a global percussion of the lung which moves secretions and probably clears the peripheral bronchial tree. We propose the comparison between an existing device (SmartVest) and a new device (RespIn 11).

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomized into three groups: a group was treated with SmartVest, a group with RespIn 11, and a group with pharmacological therapy alone. Primary outcome measures included exacerbations at 3, 6 and 12 months after the end of treatment. Secondary outcome measures were pulmonary function testing, arterial blood gas analysis (ABG), and hematological examinations, cough, dyspnea, health and quality of life scores (Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire [BHQ], Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale [BCSS], COPD Assessment Test [CAT], Leicester Cough Questionnaire [LCT]). A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate patient's preference.

RESULTS

Both patients in the HFCWO groups showed a significant improvement in the tests of dyspnea, cough and health and quality of life score evaluations (BHQ, BCSS, CAT, LCT) compared to the control group, but not in pulmonary function tests and ABG. Only RespIn 11 significantly reduced exacerbations in comparison with the control group. RespIn 11 also had a higher score regarding patients' preference.

CONCLUSIONS

The two machines have improved health and quality of life scores in patients with bronchiectasis. RespIn 11 also demonstrated a significant lowering of exacerbations and a better patient acceptance.

Preliminary validation of the NTM Module: a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease

INTRODUCTION

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) cause chronic, debilitating pulmonary disease. Patient-reported outcomes provide measures of symptoms, functioning and treatment response. Here we describe the preliminary validation of the recently developed NTM Module.

METHODS

The study population included Northwest NTM Biobank patients in whom Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) was isolated and who had ever met the 2007 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America pulmonary disease criteria. The NTM Module was administered at enrolment and 12 months; a subset also completed the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B). The NTM Module generates four domain scores (0-100; higher scores indicate better functioning) reflecting NTM-specific symptoms (NTM Symptoms, Body Image, Digestive Symptoms and Eating Problems). We described patient characteristics and mean scores, and evaluated psychometric properties, including response to treatment at 12 months, for each domain.

RESULTS

Overall, 203 patients with pulmonary MAC disease were included. Average enrolment scores ranged from 76 (NTM Symptoms) to 84 (Eating Problems). Ceiling effects were observed for Body Image (26% of participants) and Eating Problems (52%). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) ranged from 0.67 (Digestive Symptoms) to 0.89 (Eating Problems). The intraclass correlation for test-retest reproducibility (n=27) ranged from 0.72 (Body Image) to 0.94 (Eating Problems). Patients starting treatment (n=35) had statistically significant increases in scores for NTM Symptoms (+5, p=0.04), Digestive Symptoms (+7, p=0.002), Body Image (+7, p=0.03) and QOL-B Respiratory Symptoms (n=25, +10, p=0.006). NTM Symptoms scores increased by 15 points (p=0.002) in the 16 patients with scores ≤80 at enrolment.

CONCLUSION

The NTM Module generally performs well as a valid patient-reported outcome for pulmonary MAC disease and was responsive to MAC treatment.

Development and initial validation of the bronchiectasis exacerbation and symptom tool (BEST)

Background

Recurrent bronchiectasis exacerbations are related to deterioration of lung function, progression of the disease, impairment of quality of life, and to an increased mortality. Improved detection of exacerbations has been accomplished in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through the use of patient completed diaries. These tools may enhance exacerbation reporting and identification. The aim of this study was to develop a novel symptom diary for bronchiectasis symptom burden and detection of exacerbations, named the BEST diary.

Methods

Prospective observational study of patients with bronchiectasis conducted at Ninewells Hospital, Dundee. We included patients with confirmed bronchiectasis by computed tomography, who were symptomatic and had at least 1 documented exacerbation of bronchiectasis in the previous 12 months to participate. Symptoms were recorded daily in a diary incorporating cough, sputum volume, sputum colour, dyspnoea, fatigue and systemic disturbance scored from 0 to 26.

Results

Twenty-one patients were included in the study. We identified 29 reported (treated exacerbations) and 23 unreported (untreated) exacerbations over 6-month follow-up. The BEST diary score showed a good correlation with the established and validated questionnaires and measures of health status (COPD Assessment Test, r = 0.61, p = 0.0037, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, r = − 0.52,p = 0.0015, St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, r = 0.61,p < 0.0001 and 6 min walk test, r = − 0.46,p = 0.037). The mean BEST score at baseline was 7.1 points (SD 2.2). The peak symptom score during exacerbation was a mean of 16.4 (3.1), and the change from baseline to exacerbation was a mean of 9.1 points (SD 2.5). Mean duration of exacerbations based on time for a return to baseline symptoms was 15.3 days (SD 5.7). A minimum clinically important difference of 4 points is proposed.

Conclusions

The BEST symptom diary has shown concurrent validity with current health questionnaires and is responsive at onset and recovery from exacerbation. The BEST diary may be useful to detect and characterise exacerbations in bronchiectasis clinical trials.

The biology of pulmonary exacerbations in bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is a heterogeneous chronic disease. Heterogeneity characterises bronchiectasis not only in the stable state but also during exacerbations, despite evidence on clinical and biological aspects of bronchiectasis, exacerbations still remain poorly understood.Although the scientific community recognises that bacterial infection is a cornerstone in the development of bronchiectasis, there is a lack of data regarding other trigger factors for exacerbations. In addition, a huge amount of data suggest a primary role of neutrophils in the stable state and exacerbation of bronchiectasis, but the inflammatory reaction involves many other additional pathways. Cole's vicious cycle hypothesis illustrates how airway dysfunction, airway inflammation, infection and structural damage are linked. The introduction of the concept of a "vicious vortex" stresses the complexity of the relationships between the components of the cycle. In this model of disease, exacerbations work as a catalyst, accelerating the progression of disease. The roles of microbiology and inflammation need to be considered as closely linked and will need to be investigated in different ways to collect samples. Clinical and translational research is of paramount importance to achieve a better comprehension of the pathophysiology of bronchiectasis, microbiology and inflammation both in the stable state and during exacerbations.

Validation of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) as an Outcome Measure in Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Objective assessment of symptoms in bronchiectasis is important for research and in clinical practice. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a short, simple assessment tool widely used in COPD. The items included in the CAT are not specific to COPD and also reflect the dominant symptoms of bronchiectasis. We therefore performed a study to validate the CAT as an outcome measure in bronchiectasis.

METHODS

The CAT was administered to two cohorts of bronchiectasis patients along with other quality of life questionnaires. Patients underwent comprehensive clinical assessment. One cohort had repeated questionnaires collected before-and-after treatment of acute exacerbations. We analyzed convergent validity, repeatability, and responsiveness of the score and calculated the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using a combination of distribution and anchor-based methods.

RESULTS

In both cohorts there were positive correlations between the CAT and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (r = 0.90, P < .0001 and r = 0.87, P < .0001). There was an inverse relationship between CAT and Quality of Life - Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptoms Scale (r = -0.75, P < .0001) and Leicester Cough Questionnaire score (r = -0.77, P < .0001). Patients with more severe disease, based on the bronchiectasis severity index, had significantly higher CAT scores. CAT also correlated with FEV₁ % predicted and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). CAT increased significantly at exacerbation and fell at recovery. The intraclass correlation coefficient for two measurements four-weeks apart while clinically stable was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73-0.95, P < .0001). An MCID of 4 was most consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

CAT is a valid, responsive symptom assessment tool in bronchiectasis. The MCID is estimated as 4 points.

The microbiome in bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is increasing in prevalence worldwide, yet current treatments available are limited to those alleviating symptoms and reducing exacerbations. The pathogenesis of the disease and the inflammatory, infective and molecular drivers of disease progression are not fully understood, making the development of novel treatments challenging. Understanding the role bacteria play in disease progression has been enhanced by the use of next-generation sequencing techniques such as 16S rRNA sequencing. The microbiome has not been extensively studied in bronchiectasis, but existing data show lung bacterial communities dominated by Pseudomonas, Haemophilus and Streptococcus, while exhibiting intraindividual stability and large interindividual variability. Pseudomonas- and Haemophilus-dominated microbiomes have been shown to be linked to severe disease and frequent exacerbations. Studies completed to date are limited in size and do not fully represent all clinically observed disease subtypes. Further research is required to understand the microbiomes role in bronchiectasis disease progression. This review discusses recent developments and future perspectives on the lung microbiome in bronchiectasis.

COPD Assessment Test in Bronchiectasis: Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Psychometric Validation: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (QoL) is one of the most important end points in bronchiectasis (BE). However, the majority of health-related QoL questionnaires are time-consuming or not validated in BE. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an easy-to-use questionnaire. The objective of this study was to perform a complete validation of the CAT in BE.

METHODS

This was an observational, multicenter, prospective study in patients with BE. Psychometric properties of the CAT were measured: internal consistency (Cronbach α), repeatability (test-retest; intraclass correlation coefficient), discriminant validity (correlation with severity scores), convergent validity (correlation with some validated QoL questionnaire and other clinical variables of interest), longitudinal validity (measuring before and after each exacerbation during follow-up to determine the sensitivity to change and responsiveness), predictive validity to future exacerbations, and finally minimum clinically important difference.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were included and followed up for 1 year. Their mean age was 62.2 (15.6) years (79.2% women). The CAT showed excellent internal consistency (α, 0.95) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95). The validity of the CAT was excellent in all the measures (almost all with a Pearson coefficient > 0.40) except for the correlations with severity scores (Pearson coefficient between 0.22 and 0.26). Sensitivity to change before and after exacerbations was set at between 5.4 and 5.8 points. A CAT value ≥ 10 points showed prognostic value for patients with more than one exacerbation, and finally the minimum clinically important difference was set at 3 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAT presented excellent psychometric properties and is a questionnaire that is easy to use and interpret in patients with BE.

Bronchiectasis update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bronchiectasis, once thought to be an orphan disease, is being diagnosed with increased frequency in the United States and around the world. The present review aims to provide an update on recent publications on the diagnosis and management of bronchiectasis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two large bronchiectasis patient registries have published initial reports regarding demographics and other patient data in 2017. Updates on the microbiology, microbiome, and inflammation in patients with bronchiectasis are clarifying the complexities of airway infection in this disease. A consensus definition of 'exacerbation' in bronchiectasis has been agreed upon this year. Reports on novel treatments, including the repurposing of older therapies, have also been published in 2016-2017. A new European guideline for the management of adult bronchiectasis is also now available.

SUMMARY

Bronchiectasis, a resurgent disease, is now being better defined with a rapidly expanding portfolio of demographic, clinical, and therapeutic research and publications.

Pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbation of bronchiectasis: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and reduces risk of future exacerbation in COPD when performed after an exacerbation. There have been no previous studies of post-exacerbation rehabilitation in bronchiectasis.

METHODS

Parallel group randomized controlled trial compared pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) to standard care (SC) in patients followed an antibiotic treated exacerbation of bronchiectasis. Patients were randomized following a 14 day course of antibiotics was completed. The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6 MW) at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to the next exacerbation, St.Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD CAT score, Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) and FEV1 at 8 and 12 weeks post exacerbation.

RESULTS

Forty eight patients were enrolled but only 27 had exacerbations within 12 months of enrolment. Nine patients received pulmonary rehabilitation and 18 received standard care. The 6 MW improved significantly from post-exacerbation to 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant difference between PR and SC- mean difference of 11 m (95% CI -34.3 to 56.3,p = 0.6). Time to the next exacerbation was not significantly different hazard ratio 0.83 (0.31-2.19, p = 0.7). No significant differences were seen between groups in terms of LCQ, CAT, FEV1 or SGRQ between groups. An analysis of probability based on the patients enrolled suggested > 1000 subjects are likely be required to have an > 80% probability of observing a statistically significant difference between PR and SC and any such differences would be likely to be too small to be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study identified no significant benefits associated with pulmonary rehabilitation after exacerbations of bronchiectasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02179983, registered on Clinicaltrials.gov 29th June 2014.

Bronchiectasis: A Complex, Heterogeneous Disease

Most areas of respiratory medicine continue to use an Oslerian approach, based on signs and symptoms, in which the disease is the center of all activity. However, this paradigm is changing. Now that lung diseases have been recognized as heterogeneous and complex, we are moving towards more personalized, precise, patient-oriented medicine. The aim of this review was to define the current state of the knowledge on bronchiectasis, or, more accurately, the bronchiectasis syndrome, as a multidimensional, systemic, heterogeneous, complex disease. We explore the advances that have already been made, and above all the many steps that are still to be taken. We also propose some tools which might facilitate the application of these concepts in clinical practice, and help us continue our journey towards a more holistic view of this disease.

Bronchiectasis insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?

Bronchiectasis is an increasingly common disease with a significant impact on quality of life and morbidity of affected patients. It is also a very heterogeneous disease with numerous different underlying etiologies and presentations. Most treatments for bronchiectasis are based on low-quality evidence; consequently, no treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of bronchiectasis. The last several years have seen numerous clinical trials in which the investigational agent, thought to hold great promise, did not demonstrate a clinically or statistically significant benefit. This commentary will review the likely reasons for these disappointing results and a potential approach that may have a greater likelihood of defining evidence-based treatment for bronchiectasis.

A systematic review of pharmacotherapeutic clinical trial end-points for bronchiectasis in adults

Bronchiectasis is an increasing clinical problem, but multiple recent clinical trials have failed to reach their primary end-point. Difficulties in achieving “positive” bronchiectasis trials is reflected in a lack of agreement from trialists and regulators on what are the optimal end-points.

To evaluate the use of end-points in bronchiectasis trials, we conducted a systematic review of published bronchiectasis trials from 2008 to 2018 and extracted end-points used, definitions, methods of analysis and responsiveness.

Our analysis shows that quality of life and exacerbation end-points are most frequently used. Trials using exacerbation end-points have been characterised by varying definitions, multiple methods of analysis and durations of follow-up. There are multiple quality of life tools for bronchiectasis (Quality of Life – Bronchiectasis questionnaire, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, etc.). The majority of studies measure lung function (e.g. forced expiratory volume in 1 s), but this is shown to be nonresponsive to the majority of interventions. Microbiology end-points frequently show statistically significant differences in phase 2 antibiotic studies but their correlation with clinical end-points is unknown.

This systematic review demonstrates a need for guidance to standardise definitions and design features to improve reproducibility and increase the likelihood of demonstrating statistically significant benefits with new therapies.

There is an urgent need to standardise clinical trial end-points in bronchiectasis. This systematic review shows the diversity of end-points used in bronchiectasis and suggests approaches that may improve the success rate and reproducibility of trials.http://ow.ly/d4HR30nvvS3

Development and validation of a scale to measure the quality of patient medication counseling using Rasch model

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the psychometric properties of a scale for measuring the quality of patient medication counseling by using the Rasch model.

Methods:

In this study, the scale was developed based on the literature review. It consisted of 31 items across five subscales: introduction, problem identification, content, behavior, and conclusion. A convenient sample of community pharmacists was recruited from four major cities in Vietnam: Hanoi, Da Nang, Ho Chi Minh, and Can Tho. Data collection was conducted from June 10 to October 30, 2017. A Rasch analysis for polytomous data was performed to assess the suitability of the item and the reliability of the scale.

Results:

The research results showed that all items had a positive point-measure correlation coefficient between 0.47 and 0.77. All items had infit and outfit values in the optimal range between 0.5 and 1.5 except for D₅, but its value was within acceptable range. Differential item function analysis indicated that all items had no DIF, except for items B₄ and E₄ containing moderate magnitude of DIF. Response category statistics found that there was a gradual increase in difficulty level from category 1 to 5 and no presence of reversal. Infit and outfit statistics of these categories were also considered good, with their values close to 1. The test result of the item characteristic curve and the person-item map showed that there were some overlapping items. Their appearance, however, might play an important role in measuring different aspects of construct. The overall scale reliability index (0.97) was high and the overall scale separation index (6.11) was good.

Conclusions:

The developed scale satisfied the requirements of the Rasch model. The scale is a useful tool that could be used to measure the quality of patient medication counseling among community pharmacists.

COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a Valid and Simple Tool to Measure the Impact of Bronchiectasis on Affected Patients

The COPD assessment test (CAT) is a short questionnaire developed to help patients and clinicians to assess the impact of symptoms in routine clinical practice. We aimed to validate and to test the reproducibility of CAT in patients with bronchiectasis and correlate with the severity of dyspnea, aerobic and functional capacity, and physical activity in daily life. This is a cross-sectional study, patients with bronchiectasis underwent spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), Saint George`s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and received pedometer. CAT was applied twice (CAT-1 and CAT-2, 7 to 10 days apart). The severity of bronchiectasis was assessed by E-FACED and bronchiectasis severity index (BSI). A total of 100 patients were evaluated (48 ± 14 years, 59 women, FVC: 67 ± 22% pred, FEV₁: 52 ± 25% pred). According to CAT, 14% patients presented low, 40% medium, 32% high, and 14% very high impact. The higher the CAT, the worse the severity of bronchiectasis, dyspnea, quality of life, performance on the CPET, and smaller the distance walked (DW) on the ISWT and number of steps (NS) per day. There was significant correlation between CAT and SGRQ, E-FACED, BSI, NS, ISWT, oxygen uptake, and workload at CPET. CAT-1 and CAT-2 presented similar values: 21 (13-26) and 19 (13-26), respectively. The CAT is a valid and reproducible instrument in patients with bronchiectasis presenting good correlation with clinical, functional, and quality of life measurements. This easy-to-use, easy-to-understand, quick, and useful tool may play an important role to assess the impact of bronchiectasis on both daily medical practice and clinical trial settings.

Validation of the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test as a Clinical End Point in Bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

A validated clinical end point is needed to assess response to therapies in bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) as a clinical end point in bronchiectasis.

METHODS

In clinically stable patients (n = 30), the ISWT was performed twice, 6 months apart. Correlation between the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the ISWT (n = 94) was performed. The 1-year gentamicin study was reanalyzed to assess the area under the curve (percent change of ISWT with a ≥ 4 unit improvement in total SGRQ). ISWT was performed prior to and following 14 days of antibiotics for an exacerbation (94 oral courses and 30 IV courses, n = 124) and reanalysis of the 1-year gentamicin study (n = 57).

RESULTS

The ISWT did not significantly change over 6 months while clinically stable. The ISWT correlated inversely with the SGRQ (rs = -0.60; P < .0001), Bronchiectasis Severity Index score (rs = -0.44; P < .0001), and sedentary time (rs = -0.48; P = .0007) but correlated with physical activity (rs = 0.42; P = .004). The area under the curve for percent change in ISWT with ≥ 4 unit improvement in SGRQ was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.91; P = .001). A threshold of 5% improvement in the ISWT had a 92% sensitivity but 50% specificity, and from the responsiveness studies would capture 73% of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the ISWT to be reliable, valid, and responsive to change in patients with bronchiectasis. The authors propose that a minimum clinically important difference of 5% improvement in the ISWT would be a useful objective end point to assess therapies in bronchiectasis.

Advances in bronchiectasis: endotyping, genetics, microbiome, and disease heterogeneity

Bronchiectasis is characterised by pathological dilation of the airways. More specifically, the radiographic demonstration of airway enlargement is the common feature of a heterogeneous set of conditions and clinical presentations. No approved therapies exist for the condition other than for bronchiectasis caused by cystic fibrosis. The heterogeneity of bronchiectasis is a major challenge in clinical practice and the main reason for difficulty in achieving endpoints in clinical trials. Recent observations of the past 2 years have improved the understanding of physicians regarding bronchiectasis, and have indicated that it might be more effective to classify patients in a different way. Patients could be categorised according to a heterogeneous group of endotypes (defined by a distinct functional or pathobiological mechanism) or by clinical phenotypes (defined by relevant and common features of the disease). In doing so, more specific therapies needed to effectively treat patients might finally be developed. Here, we describe some of the recent advances in endotyping, genetics, and disease heterogeneity of bronchiectasis including observations related to the microbiome.