Perioperative approach to precapillary pulmonary hypertension in non-cardiac non-obstetric surgery

Predicting Peri-Operative Cardiorespiratory Adverse Events in Children with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Using Echocardiography: A Cohort Study

General anesthesia in children with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) carries an increased risk of peri-operative cardiorespiratory complications though risk stratifying individual children pre-operatively remains difficult. We report the incidence and echocardiographic risk factors for adverse events in children with PAH undergoing general anesthesia for cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and adverse event data from consecutive PAH patients are reported. A multivariable predictive model was developed from echocardiographic variables identified by Bayesian univariable logistic regression. Model performance was reported by area under the curve for receiver operating characteristics (AUCroc) and precision/recall (AUCpr) and a pre-operative scoring system derived (0-100). Ninety-three children underwent 158 cardiac catheterizations with mean age 8.8 ± 4.6 years. Adverse events (n = 42) occurred in 15 patients (16%) during 16 catheterizations (10%) including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 5, 3%), electrocardiographic changes (n = 3, 2%), significant hypotension (n = 2, 1%), stridor (n = 1, 1%), and death (n = 2, 1%). A multivariable model (age, right ventricular dysfunction, and dilatation, pulmonary and tricuspid regurgitation severity, and maximal velocity) was highly predictive of adverse events (AUCroc 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.00; AUCpr 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.91; baseline AUCpr 0.10). Pre-operative risk scores were higher in those who had a subsequent adverse event (median 47, IQR 43 to 53) than in those who did not (median 23, IQR 15 to 33). Pre-operative echocardiography informs the risk of peri-operative adverse events and may therefore be useful both for consent and multi-disciplinary care planning.

Perioperative Management of Novel Pharmacotherapies for Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension

Heart failure (HF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are increasingly prevalent comorbidities in patients presenting for noncardiac surgery. The unique pathophysiology and pharmacotherapies associated with these syndromes have important perioperative implications. As new medications for HF and PH emerge, it is imperative that anesthesiologists and other perioperative providers understand their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and potential adverse effects. We present an overview of the novel HF and PH pharmacotherapies and strategies for their perioperative management.

Surgery and Anesthesia in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is characterized by right ventricular impairment and a reduced ability to compensate for hemodynamic insults. Consequently, surgery can be challenging but is increasingly considered in view of available specific therapies and improved longer term survival. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach involving surgeons, anesthetists, pulmonary hypertension clinicians, and intensivists. The optimal pathway involves risk:benefit assessment for the proposed operation, optimization of pulmonary hypertension and any comorbidities, the appropriate anesthetic approach for the specific procedure and patient, and careful monitoring and management in the postoperative period. Where patients are carefully selected and meticulously managed, good outcomes can be achieved.

Predicting Patient Status in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Using a Biophysical Model

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) involves abnormally high blood pressure in the pulmonary vessels and is associated with small vessel vasculopathy and pre-capillary proximal occlusions. Management of CTEPH disease is challenging, therefore accurate diagnosis is crucial in ensuring effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. The treatment of choice for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy, which is an invasive surgical intervention to remove thrombi. Following PEA, a number of patients experience poor outcomes or worse-than-expected improvements, which may indicate that they have significant small vessel disease. A method that can predict the extent of distal remodelling may provide useful clinical information to plan appropriate CTEPH patient treatment. Here, a novel biophysical modelling approach has been developed to estimate and quantify the extent of distal remodelling. This method includes a combination of mathematical modelling and computed tomography pulmonary angiography to first model the geometry of the pulmonary arteries and to identify the under-perfused regions in CTEPH. The geometric model is then used alongside haemodynamic measurements from right heart catheterisation to predict distal remodelling. In this study, the method is tested and validated using synthetically generated remodelling data. Then, a preliminary application of this technique to patient data is shown to demonstrate the potential of the approach for use in the clinical setting.Clinical relevance- Patient-specific modelling can help provide useful information regarding the extent of distal vasculopathy on a per-patient basis, which remains challenging. Physicians can be unsure of outcomes following pulmonary endarterectomy. Therefore, the predictive aspect of the patient's response to surgery can help with clinical decision-making.

Some take-home messages from the 9th International Meeting on Pulmonary Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs

Dissemination of updated knowledge on rare and ultra-rare respiratory diseases has always been a priority of the European Respiratory Review (ERR) [1, 2]. In this issue, we publish the first of a collection of four articles that discuss hot topics with direct practical clinical consequences. First, Mackintoshet al. [3] review the challenges and controversies (which are not few!) in “interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features” (IPAF). Following the publication, in 2015, of the classification of IPAF proposed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) [4], a number of articles have been published on this entity which truly requires a multidisciplinary approach. Airway and vascular involvement are discussed in detail, as well as the problem of severe vasculopathy that can characterise some IPAF patients. The authors also discuss the controversial issue of the therapeutic approach for this “research entity” and state that “while identification of a histological NSIP pattern would support an immunosuppressive approach, histological confirmation of a UIP pattern would lead to a more cautious approach to immunosuppression, with frequent monitoring and earlier consideration of anti-fibrotic therapy, should there be progression” [3].

The 9th International Meeting on Pulmonary Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs was dedicated to the management of rare pulmonary parenchymal and vascular diseases and rare variants of more common respiratory conditionshttps://bit.ly/3rq7b95