1
|
Danzo F, Radovanovic D, Gatti M, Saad M, Perotto L, Franceschi E, Santus P. A reappraisal of inspiratory capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: clinical correlates and role of long-acting muscarinic antagonists and long-acting β2 agonists. Expert Rev Respir Med 2022; 16:623-635. [PMID: 35722753 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2022.2090343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), static and dynamic hyperinflation, together with expiratory flow limitation and gas exchange abnormalities, is one of the major causes of dyspnea, decreased exercise performance and ventilatory failure. An increase in functional residual capacity (FRC) is accompanied by a decrease in inspiratory capacity (IC), which is a volume readily available, repeatable, and simple to measure with any spirometer. Changes in IC and FRC after bronchodilation, contrary to changes in FEV1, have been closely associated with improvements in dyspnea and exercise performance. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase databases for clinical trials that assessed the effects of dual bronchodilation on inspiratory capacity in patients with COPD. AREAS COVERED Despite their pivotal role in COPD, IC and static volumes have rarely been considered as primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy of bronchodilators. Available studies on dual bronchodilation have shown a significant and persistent positive impact on IC focusing mainly on patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, whereas dynamic hyperinflation is also present at milder disease stages. EXPERT OPINION This narrative review discusses the pathophysiological and clinical importance of measuring IC in patients with COPD and how IC can be modified by maximizing bronchodilation combining long-acting muscarinic antagonists and long-acting β2 agonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiammetta Danzo
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Dejan Radovanovic
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy
| | - Marina Gatti
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Marina Saad
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Perotto
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Elisa Franceschi
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Pierachille Santus
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miravitlles M, García-Rivero JL, Ribera X, Galera J, García A, Palomino R, Pomares X. Exercise capacity and physical activity in COPD patients treated with a LAMA/LABA combination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 2022; 23:347. [PMID: 36522735 PMCID: PMC9753337 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-02268-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent airflow limitation and dyspnoea may reduce chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients exercise capacity and physical activity, undermining their physical status and quality of life. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists and long-acting beta-2 agonists (LAMA/LABA) combinations are amongst moderate-to-severe COPD recommended treatments. This article analyses LAMA/LABA combinations effect on COPD patients exercise capacity and physical activity outcomes. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials comparing LAMA/LABA combinations against monotherapy or placebo was conducted. RESULTS Seventeen articles were identified (N = 4041 patients). In endurance shuttle walk test and constant work rate cycle ergometry, LAMA/LABA combinations obtained better results than placebo, but not monotherapy, whereas in 6-min walking test, results favoured LAMA/LABA over monotherapy (four studies), but not over placebo (one study). Moreover, LAMA/LABA combinations obtained better results than placebo in number of steps per day, reduction in percentage of inactive patients and daily activity-related energy expenditure, and better than monotherapy when measuring time spent on ≥ 1.0-1.5, ≥ 2.0 and ≥ 3.0 metabolic equivalents of task activities. CONCLUSIONS LAMA/LABA combinations in COPD patients provided better results than monotherapy or placebo in most exercise capacity and physical activity outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Miravitlles
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’HebronVall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Pg. Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Luís García-Rivero
- grid.411325.00000 0001 0627 4262Pneumology Department, President of ACINAR, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Xavier Ribera
- grid.488221.50000 0004 0544 6204Boehringer Ingelheim España S.A., Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Xavier Pomares
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Pneumology Department, Hospital de Sabadell, Hospital Universitari Parc TaulíInstitut Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ismaila AS, Haeussler K, Czira A, Tongbram V, Malmenäs M, Agarwal J, Nassim M, Živković-Gojović M, Shen Y, Dong X, Duarte M, Compton C, Vogelmeier CF, Halpin DMG. Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis. Adv Ther 2022; 39:4961-5010. [PMID: 35857184 PMCID: PMC9525347 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02234-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (LAMA/LABA) dual maintenance therapies for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) versus other dual and mono-bronchodilator therapies in symptomatic patients with COPD. METHODS A systematic literature review (October 2015-November 2020) was performed to identify RCTs ≥ 8 weeks long in adult patients with COPD that compared LAMA/LABA combinations against any long-acting bronchodilator-containing dual therapy or monotherapy. Data extracted on changes from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score, rescue medication use and moderate/severe exacerbation rate were analysed using an NMA in a frequentist framework. The primary comparison was at 24 weeks. Fixed effects model results are presented. RESULTS The NMA included 69 full-length publications (including 10 GSK clinical study reports) reporting 49 studies. At 24 weeks, UMEC/VI provided statistically significant greater improvements in FEV1 versus all dual therapy and monotherapy comparators. UMEC/VI provided similar improvements in SGRQ total score compared with all other LAMA/LABAs, and significantly greater improvements versus UMEC 125 μg, glycopyrronium 50 μg, glycopyrronium 18 μg, tiotropium 18 μg and salmeterol 50 μg. UMEC/VI also provided significantly better outcomes versus some comparators for TDI focal score, rescue medication use, annualised moderate/severe exacerbation rate, and time to first moderate/severe exacerbation. CONCLUSION UMEC/VI provided generally better outcomes compared with LAMA or LABA monotherapies, and consistent improvements in lung function (measured by change from baseline in trough FEV1 at 24 weeks) versus dual therapies. Treatment with UMEC/VI may improve outcomes for symptomatic patients with COPD compared with alternative maintenance treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afisi S. Ismaila
- R&D Global Medical, GSK, Collegeville, PA USA ,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada ,Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426-0989 USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria Duarte
- R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex UK
| | | | - Claus F. Vogelmeier
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - David M. G. Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Targeting exertional breathlessness to improve physical activity: the role of primary care. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2021; 31:41. [PMID: 34504091 PMCID: PMC8429707 DOI: 10.1038/s41533-021-00254-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). By working together with patients to target exertional breathlessness and increase physical activity, PCPs have an important role to play, early in the disease course, in improving patient outcomes in both the short and long term. In this article, we consider how physical activity affects disease progression from the PCP perspective. We discuss the role of pharmacological therapy, the importance of an holistic approach and the role of PCPs in assessing and promoting physical activity. The complexity and heterogeneity of COPD make it a challenging disease to treat. Patients' avoidance of activity, and subsequent decline in capacity to perform it, further impacts the management of the disease. Improving patient tolerance of physical activity, increasing participation in daily activities and helping patients to remain active are clear goals of COPD management. These may require an holistic approach to management, including pulmonary rehabilitation and psychological programmes in parallel with bronchodilation therapy, in order to address both physiological and behavioural factors. PCPs have an important role to optimise therapy, set goals and communicate the importance of maintaining physical activity to their patients. In addition, optimal treatment that addresses activity-related breathlessness can help prevent the downward spiral of inactivity and get patients moving again, to improve their overall health and long-term prognosis.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zysman M, Ribeiro Baptista B, Soumagne T, Marques da Silva V, Martin C, Thibault de Menonville C, Boyer L, Degano B, Morelot Panzini C, Burgel PR, Perez T, Bourdin A, Raherison C, Pégliasco H, Piperno D, Zanetti C, Morel H, Delclaux B, Delafosse C, Lorenzo A, Housset B, Chabot F, Devillier P, Deslée G, Roche N. [Pharmacological treatment optimisation in patients with stale COPD. Position of the French-language Respiratory Society. 2021 Update]. Rev Mal Respir 2021; 38:539-561. [PMID: 33985869 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2021.02.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Zysman
- Université Bordeaux, centre de recherche cardiothoracique de Bordeaux, U1045, CIC 1401, 33604 Pessac, France; Service des maladies respiratoires, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - B Ribeiro Baptista
- Université Paris-Est, UMR S955, UPEC, 94000 Créteil, France; Département de pneumologie, CHRU Nancy, université de Lorraine, Inserm, U1116, université de Lorraine, Nancy/Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - T Soumagne
- Service de pneumologie, oncologie thoracique et allergologie respiratoire, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | - C Martin
- Department of Respir Med, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | | | - L Boyer
- Université Paris-Est, UMR S955, UPEC, 94000 Créteil, France; Département de physiologie-explorations fonctionnelles, AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Paris, France
| | - B Degano
- Service hospitalier universitaire pneumologie physiologie, pôle thorax et vaisseaux, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France; Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - C Morelot Panzini
- Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P R Burgel
- Department of Respir Med, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | - T Perez
- Service de pneumologie, CHU Lille, institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR9017, centre d'infection et d'immunité de Lille (CIIL), Lille, France
| | - A Bourdin
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, Montpellier, France; Department of Respiratory Diseases, University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - C Raherison
- Service des maladies respiratoires, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, université Bordeaux, INSERM, Team EPICENE, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | - H Pégliasco
- Service de pneumologie, hôpital européen, Marseille, France
| | | | - C Zanetti
- Cabinet de pneumologie, 62300 Lens, France
| | - H Morel
- Service de pneumologie d'allergologie et d'oncologie thoracique, CHR d'Orléans, 45067 Orléans, France
| | - B Delclaux
- Service de pneumologie, centre hospitalier de Troyes, 10003 Troyes, France
| | - C Delafosse
- Centre hospitaliser Simone-Veil, 95602 Eaubonne, France
| | - A Lorenzo
- Médecine Sorbonne université, département de médecine générale, Paris, France
| | - B Housset
- Département de pneumologie, CHI de Créteil, University Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - F Chabot
- Département de pneumologie, CHRU Nancy, université de Lorraine, Inserm, U1116, université de Lorraine, Nancy/Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - P Devillier
- Department of Airway Diseases, VIM-Suresnes, UMR0892, Foch Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Suresnes, France
| | - G Deslée
- Service de pneumologie, Inserm U1250, CHU Reims, université Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - N Roche
- Department of Respir Med, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Müllerová H, Dransfield MT, Thomashow B, Jones PW, Rennard S, Karlsson N, Fageras M, Metzdorf N, Petruzzelli S, Rommes J, Sciurba FC, Tabberer M, Merrill D, Tal-Singer R. Clinical Development and Research Applications of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201:1058-1067. [PMID: 31815521 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201907-1369pp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hana Müllerová
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Global Medical R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T Dransfield
- Lung Health Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Paul W Jones
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Global Medical R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Rennard
- University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska.,BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Malin Fageras
- BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Frank C Sciurba
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Maggie Tabberer
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Global Medical R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ruth Tal-Singer
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Medical Innovation, Global Medical R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Albertson TE, Bowman WS, Harper RW, Godbout RM, Murin S. Evidence-based review of data on the combination inhaler umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2019; 14:1251-1265. [PMID: 31239659 PMCID: PMC6559138 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s191845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of inhaled, fixed-dose, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) combined with long-acting, beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists (LABA) has become a mainstay in the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). One of the fixed-dose LAMA/LABA combinations is the dry powder inhaler (DPI) of umeclidinium bromide (UMEC) and vilanterol trifenatate (VI) (62.5 µg/25 µg) approved for once-a-day maintenance treatment of COPD. This paper reviews the use of fixed-dose combination LAMA/LABA agents focusing on the UMEC/VI DPI inhaler in the maintenance treatment of COPD. The fixed-dose combination LAMA/LABA inhaler offers a step beyond a single inhaled maintenance agent but is still a single device for the COPD patient having frequent COPD exacerbations and persistent symptoms not well controlled on one agent. Currently available clinical trials suggest that the once-a-day DPI of UMEC/VI is well-tolerated, safe and non-inferior or better than other currently available inhaled fixed-dose LAMA/LABA combinations for COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Albertson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Willis S Bowman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Richart W Harper
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Regina M Godbout
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Susan Murin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ray R, Tombs L, Asmus MJ, Boucot I, Lipson DA, Compton C, Naya I. Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Elderly Patients with COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Drugs Aging 2018; 35:637-647. [PMID: 29951734 PMCID: PMC6061430 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0558-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this pooled analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 µg dual bronchodilation versus placebo in elderly symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS We conducted a post hoc pooled analysis of data from 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Change from baseline (CFB) in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), proportion of FEV1 responders (≥ 100-mL increase from baseline), and safety were analyzed in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years on Days 28, 56, and 84 (12-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), Days 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, and 169 (24-week analysis of parallel-group design studies), and Days 2, 42, and 84 (12-week analysis of crossover design studies). RESULTS The UMEC/VI intent-to-treat (ITT) populations comprised 2246, 1296, and 472 patients in the 12-week parallel-group, 24-week parallel-group, and 12-week crossover analysis, respectively (≥ 65 years: 36-44%; ≥ 75 years: 7-11%). The placebo ITT populations comprised 528, 280, and 505 patients, respectively (≥ 65 years: 37-41%; ≥ 75 years: 5-11%). Significant improvements in trough FEV1 and significantly greater proportions of FEV1 responders were seen with UMEC/VI compared with placebo in all analyses regardless of patient age or timepoint considered (p ≤ 0.023), except Day 84 trough FEV1 CFB in the 12-week crossover analysis in patients aged ≥ 75 years (p = 0.064). UMEC/VI safety profile was similar to placebo in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS In this pooled analysis of RCT data, once-daily UMEC/VI was well tolerated and provided clinically significant lung function benefits compared with placebo in younger and older patients with COPD. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline (study 208125).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riju Ray
- US Medical Affairs, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709, USA.
| | - Lee Tombs
- Precise Approach Ltd, Contingent Worker on Assignment at GSK, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - Michael J Asmus
- US Medical Affairs, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709, USA
| | | | - David A Lipson
- Respiratory Research and Development, GSK, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Chris Compton
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Ian Naya
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|