Oximetry neither to prescribe long-term oxygen therapy nor to screen for severe hypoxaemia

Pulse Oximetry: 2023 Year in Review

Pulse oximetry is arguably the most impactful monitor ever introduced into respiratory care practice. Recently there has been increased attention to the problem of occult hypoxemia in which patients are hypoxemic despite an acceptable SpO2 Although occult hypoxemia might be greater in Black patients than white patients, it is not insignificant in whites. In a given population of patients, the bias between SpO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 ) might be close to zero. However, the limits of agreement can be wide, meaning that SpO2 might overestimate SaO2 in many individual patients, which can result in occult hypoxemia in some. Manufactures report accuracy of SpO2 derived from normal individuals, which might differ from that in the clinical setting. That SpO2 overestimates SaO2 in an important number of individuals has caused some to recommend higher SpO2 targets to avoid occult hypoxemia. There is also evidence that suggests that SpO2 might not accurately trend SaO2 Additional research is needed to investigate strategies to mitigate the bias between SpO2 and SaO2 Clinicians must be cognizant of the limitations of pulse oximetry when clinically using SpO2 The aim of this paper is to provide an update on pulse oximetry.

COPD patient profiles in primary care. Referral criteria

COPD is a disease with a high prevalence that diminishes the quality of life of many patients. Despite this, there are still high rates of under-diagnosis in Spain, partly due to a lack of recognition of the pathology by patients. In this context, the role played by primary care teams becomes fundamental, as they are one of the first lines of entry into the health system. In this paper we explain the different COPD profiles that may be present, and update the tools for diagnosis and treatment, which, together with an attitude of active suspicion of the disease, can help in the correct management of patients, whether they are undiagnosed or have subsequent complications.

The benefits and drawbacks of home oxygen therapy for COPD: what's next?

INTRODUCTION

Home oxygen therapy is one of the few interventions that can improve survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when administered appropriately, although it may cause side effects and be an unnecessary burden for some patients.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes the current literature on the assessment of hypoxemia, different types of home oxygen therapy, potential beneficial and adverse effects, and emerging research on home oxygen therapy in COPD. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE up to January 2024, with additional articles being identified through clinical guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

Hypoxemia is common in patients with more severe COPD. Long-term oxygen therapy is established to prolong survival in patients with chronic severe resting hypoxemia. Conversely, in the absence of chronic severe resting hypoxemia, home oxygen therapy has an unclear or conflicting evidence base, including for palliation of breathlessness, and is generally not recommended. However, beneficial effects in some patients cannot be precluded. Evidence is emerging on the optimal daily duration of oxygen use, the role of high-flow and auto-titrated oxygen therapy, improved informed decision-making, and telemonitoring. Further research is needed to validate novel oxygen delivery systems and monitoring tools and establish long-term effects of ambulatory oxygen therapy in COPD.

Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry for Long-Term Oxygen Therapy Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Landmark studies of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) used arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) to define severe hypoxemia; however, oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) is commonly used instead. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend evaluation with arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis if SpO2 is ⩽92%. This recommendation has not been evaluated in stable outpatients with COPD undergoing testing for LTOT. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of SpO2 compared with ABG analysis of PaO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) to detect severe resting hypoxemia in patients with COPD. Methods: Retrospective analysis of paired SpO2 and ABG values from stable outpatients with COPD who underwent LTOT assessment in a single center. We calculated false negatives (FNs) as an SpO2 >88% or >89% in the presence of pulmonary hypertension with a PaO2 ⩽55 mm Hg or ⩽59 mm Hg in the presence of pulmonary hypertension. Test performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), test bias, precision, and accuracy root-mean-square (Arms). An adjusted multivariate analysis was used to evaluate factors affecting SpO2 bias. Results: Of 518 patients, the prevalence of severe resting hypoxemia was 74 (14.3%), with 52 missed by SpO2 (FN, 10%), including 13 (2.5%) with an SpO2 > 92% (occult hypoxemia). FNs and occult hypoxemia in Black patients were 9% and 1.5%, respectively, and were 13% and 5%, respectively, among active smokers. The correlation between SpO2 and SaO2 was acceptable (ICC = 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.81); and the bias of SpO2 was 0.45%, with a precision of 2.6 (-4.65 to +5.55%) and Arms of 2.59. These measurements were similar in Black patients, but in active smokers, correlation was lower and bias showed greater overestimation of SpO2. ROC analysis suggests that the optimal SpO2 cutoff to warrant LTOT evaluation by ABG analysis is ⩽94%. Conclusions: SpO2 as the only measure of oxygenation carries a high FN rate in detecting severe resting hypoxemia in patients with COPD undergoing evaluation for LTOT. Reflex measurement of PaO2 by ABG analysis should be used as recommended by GOLD, ideally at a cutoff higher than an SpO2 ⩽92%, especially in active smokers.

An Update on Outcomes for COPD Pharmacological Trials: A COPD Investigators Report - Reassessment of the 2008 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Outcomes for COPD Pharmacological Trials

Background: In 2008, a dedicated American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society task force published a paper on the possible use and limitations of clinical outcomes and biomarkers to evaluate the impact of pharmacological therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Since then, our scientific understanding of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has increased considerably; there has been a progressive shift from a one-size-fits-all diagnostic and therapeutic approach to a personalized approach; and many new treatments currently in development will require new endpoints to evaluate their efficacy adequately. Objectives: The emergence of several new relevant outcome measures motivated the authors to review advances in the field and highlight the need to update the content of the original report. Methods: The authors separately created search strategies for the literature, primarily based on their opinions and assessments supported by carefully chosen references. No centralized examination of the literature or uniform criteria for including or excluding evidence were used. Measurements and Main Results: Endpoints, outcomes, and biomarkers have been revisited. The limitations of some of those reported in the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society task force document have been highlighted. In addition, new tools that may be useful, especially in evaluating personalized therapy, have been described. Conclusions: Because the "label-free" treatable traits approach is becoming an important step toward precision medicine, future clinical trials should focus on highly prevalent treatable traits, and this will influence the choice of outcomes and markers to be considered. The use of the new tools, particularly combination endpoints, could help better identify the right patients to be treated with the new drugs.

Short-Term Oxygen Therapy Outcomes in COPD

Rationale

Short-term oxygen therapy (STOT) is often prescribed to allow patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to be discharged safely from hospital following an acute illness. This practice is widely accepted without being based on evidence.

Purpose

Our objective was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with COPD who received STOT.

Patients and Methods

The study was a secondary analysis of the INOX trial, a 4-year randomised trial of nocturnal oxygen in COPD. The trial indicated that nocturnal oxygen has no significant effect on survival or progression to LTOT, allowing our merging of patients who received nocturnal oxygen and those who received placebo into a single cohort to study the predictors and outcomes of STOT regardless of the treatment received during the trial.

Results

Among the 243 participants in the trial, 60 required STOT on at least one occasion during follow-up. Patients requiring STOT had more severe dyspnoea and lung function impairment, and lower PaO₂ at baseline than those who did not. STOT was associated with subsequent LTOT requirement (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.98–7.07) and mortality (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.15–3.24). The association between STOT and mortality was confounded by age, disease severity and comorbidities. Periods of STOT of more than one month and/or repeated prescriptions of STOT increased the probability of progression to LTOT (OR: 5.07; 95% CI: 1.48–18.8).

Conclusion

Following an acute respiratory illness in COPD, persistent hypoxaemia requiring STOT is a marker of disease progression towards the requirement for LTOT.

Life's a gas: saturation should not be used for prescription of long-term oxygen therapy

Transcutaneous oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry is unreliable for evaluating severe hypoxaemia or need for long-term oxygen therapy https://bit.ly/3CPZXOS.