Constrictive bronchiolitis in diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia

A multi-lesional analysis of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia: a single-centre analysis

AIM

To conduct a multi-lesional computed tomography (CT) analysis of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) patients to determine volumetric changes in lesions over 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective case-note review was undertaken to identify 16 patients with histological and radiological features of DIPNECH between 2012-2021. Area and volume were calculated for 17 sets of lesions identified on high-resolution CT. Clinical data were extracted from electronic patient records, which included demographic data, outpatient clinic letters, histology reports, and imaging reports.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight lesions were identified in 16 patients (one male, 15 female) and followed-up annually over a median 1,985 days (range 1,450-2,290). At year 1 follow-up, lesion area ranged from 1-48 mm2, and lesion volume ranged from 8-18,380 mm3; lesion area ranged from 1-45mm2 and lesion volume ranged from 11-17,800 mm3 and year 5. Half (8/16) of the patients had concomitant typical carcinoid tumours and one patient had an atypical carcinoid tumour. No statistically significant correlation (p<0.05) was found between lesion cross-sectional area or volume and duration of follow-up (years and days). No metastatic spread was observed at the time of analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant increase was observed in the size of over 100 lesions in patients with DIPNECH over a 5-year period and no metastasis occurred during the study period affirming the relatively indolent course of the disease.

Radiological-pathological correlation in diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH): imaging and histopathology

AIM

To review histologically confirmed diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) cases and carry out a detailed pathological-radiological correlation to see if computed tomography (CT) can be used to confidently identify DIPNECH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three histologically confirmed DIPNECH patients in the shared database of two NHS Trusts were reviewed. CT images were reviewed by two independent radiologists, each of them with >10 years of experience in thoracic imaging. All histological specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist with >25 years of experience. The diagnosis of DIPNECH was made according to the current World Health Organization (WHO) definition included in the WHO 2015 classification of pulmonary tumours. The results on histology were compared to the presence of nodules and air trapping on CT. Demographic information and, when available, molecular imaging studies and pulmonary function tests were also considered.

RESULTS

There are prototypal clinical and radiological findings reflecting the presence of underlying histological DIPNECH: middle-aged women with multiple small and scattered nodules due to the clustering and proliferation of neuroendocrine cells. At least one larger, dominant, lung nodule reflecting a carcinoid tumour is very common and mosaic attenuation/air trapping is seen approximately in 50% of cases in inspiratory scans. Airflow obstruction is rarely associated with histological bronchial or peribronchial fibrosis, which suggests other mechanisms must be involved in its development.

CONCLUSION

CT can be used to predict pathological DIPNECH in the appropriate clinical setting. It is important to consider DIPNECH to avoid overdiagnosis of more sinister conditions such as lung cancer or metastases.

A multidisciplinary approach to the work up and management of pulmonary carcinoid tumors and DIPNECH: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Low and intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are uncommon malignancies representing 2% of all lung cancers. These are termed typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoid tumors. These can arise in the setting of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH). The presentation, workup, management and outcomes of patients with these tumors can overlap with more common lung cancers but differ in that many of these patients have a prolonged clinical course. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the literature and provide evidence and expert-based algorithms for work up and treatment of pulmonary carcinoids and DIPNECH.

Methods

A search of PubMed and Web of Science databases ending April 15, 2022, with the following keywords "lung carcinoid", "DIPNECH", "lung neuroendocrine," and "bronchopulmonary carcinoid".

Key Content and Findings

Pulmonary carcinoid tumors benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. Pre-treatment imaging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and DOTATATE positron emission tomography is required. Surgical resection is the gold standard for curative intent, and possibly including sublobar resections. Patients can recur or develop new primaries thus emphasizing the importance of surveillance; national guidelines recommend at least a 10-year follow up. A growing body of literature support the use of endobronchial therapy, with long responses documented. Systemic therapy consists of everolimus, somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and chemotherapy. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor cell hyperplasia is rare, but series suggest somatostatin analogs may confer clinical benefit.

Conclusions

Pulmonary carcinoid tumors and DIPNECH are rare. Despite lack of regulatory approvals for advanced disease, multiple options are available but should be sequenced according to the clinical status and disease biology. Each patient should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting and clinical trials should be considered if available.

Pulmonary Function Tests as a Biomarker in Diffuse Idiopathic Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cell Hyperplasia Patients Treated With Somatostatin Analogues

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) describes an indolent, under-recognised and poorly understood pulmonary condition with fewer than 200 reported cases across the literature. Currently, cases are diagnosed following a biopsy of the primary lesion, with treatment options centring on symptomatic benefit as opposed to targeting the underlying aetiology. Classically, DIPNECH lesions have been described as slow growing and benign, but with growing awareness of the condition, reports of metastatic disease with significant symptomatic burden have been reported. However, effectively addressing the subset of DIPNECH patients with greater metastatic potential remains an unmet clinical need. Due to the similarities between DIPNECH and carcinoid patients, several centres have considered using somatostatin analogues to not only help symptomatically but also to initiate tumour regression. However, to date, there are limited biomarkers to help evaluate the benefit of such options. In this review, we consider the use of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) to help quantify the benefit of somatostatin analogues. Although much of the evidence stems from small single-centre studies, the use of PFTs within the treatment pathway for both localised and metastatic DIPNECH represents a meaningful improvement from subjective monitoring of disease.

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia presenting as a solitary lung nodule: a rare histopathological diagnosis

We present a case of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) in a 56-year-old woman, who presented to our emergency department with a 7-day history of exertional dyspnoea. Due to profound haemodynamic compromise, pulmonary embolism (PE) was suspected, and the patient underwent emergency thrombolysis on admission. A subsequent computerized tomography pulmonary angiogram revealed extensive bilateral PE. Incidentally, a 1.3 cm lesion within the right upper lobe, associated with pleural tethering, was identified. Positron emission tomography computerized tomography and, subsequently, histopathology revealed this lesion to be primary DIPNECH, a rare pre-invasive hyperplasia of neuroendocrine cells. While studies are scarce and cohort numbers are low, somatostatin analogues and protein kinase inhibitors have been proven to reduce symptoms and increase progression-free survival in DIPNECH, respectively.

De-labeling severe asthma diagnosis: the challenge of DIPNECH

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) is a rare pulmonary disease characterised by neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia within the bronchial epithelium [1]. The clinical presentation is characterised by nonspecific respiratory symptoms such as chronic cough, dyspnoea and bronchospasm. Given the rarity of the disease and the low specificity of symptoms, the diagnosis of DIPNECH is challenging and the time between symptom onset and diagnosis is long [1]. DIPNECH comprises a generalised proliferation of scattered neuroendocrine cells, small nodules (neuroendocrine bodies) or a linear proliferation of pulmonary neuroendocrine cells. It has been suggested that DIPNECH may mimic [2] or precede [3] asthma. The role of products of neuroendocrine cells such as substance P, which contribute to eosinophil migration, has been suggested to explain asthma symptoms in DIPNECH [3]. However, the characteristics of patients with DIPNECH who have symptoms suggestive of asthma have never been described. The aim of our study was to determine whether patients diagnosed with DIPNECH and initially referred for severe asthma management had specific characteristics.

DIPNECH is a differential diagnosis of severe asthma with no specific biomarkers. Chronic cough and multiple nodules on CT should prompt clinicians to consider this diagnosis. Differentiating DIPNECH from severe asthma remains crucial.https://bit.ly/3mmFbQn

Is the combination of bilateral pulmonary nodules and mosaic attenuation on chest CT specific for DIPNECH?

Background

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) is characterized by multifocal proliferation of pulmonary neuroendocrine cells. On chest CT, DIPNECH exhibits bilateral pulmonary nodules and mosaic attenuation in most patients. We sought to: (1) assess the specificity of this pattern (i.e., bilateral pulmonary nodules together with mosaic attenuation) for DIPNECH; (2) describe its differential diagnosis; and (3) identify the clinico-radiologic features that may help prioritize DIPNECH over other diagnostic considerations.

Methods

We searched the Mayo Clinic records from 2015 to 2019 for patients with bilateral pulmonary nodules and mosaic attenuation on CT who had a diagnostic lung biopsy. A thoracic radiologist reviewed all CT scans. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and odds ratios were utilized to measure the association between certain variables and DIPNECH.

Results

Fifty-one patients met our inclusion criteria; 40 (78%) were females and 34 (67%) were never-smokers. Median age was 65 (interquartile range 55–73) years. Lung biopsy was surgical in 21 patients (41%), transbronchial in 17 (33%), and transthoracic in 12 (24%); explanted lungs were examined in 1 (2%). Metastatic/multifocal cancer was the most common diagnosis, and was found in 17 (33%) cases. Bronchiolitis was diagnosed in 12 patients (24%), interstitial lung disease in 10 (20%), and DIPNECH in 5 (10%). Previous diagnosis of an obstructive lung disease (odds ratio 15.8; P = 0.002), and peribronchial nodular distribution on CT (odds ratio 14.4; P = 0.006) were significantly correlated with DIPNECH. Although statistical significance was not reached, DIPNECH nodules were more likely to display solid attenuations (80% vs. 67%, P = 0.45), and were more numerous; > 10 nodules were seen in 80% of DIPNECH cases vs. 52% in others (P = 0.23). Because DIPNECH primarily affects women, we analyzed the women-only cohort and found similar results.

Conclusions

Various disorders can manifest the CT pattern of bilateral pulmonary nodules together with mosaic attenuation, and this combination is nonspecific for DIPNECH, which was found in only 10% of our cohort. Previous diagnosis of an obstructive lung disease, and peribronchial distribution of the nodules on CT increased the likelihood of DIPNECH vs. other diagnoses.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-02103-w.

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia: DIPNECH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) is a rare premalignant condition. Over the past decade, there has been increased recognition and reporting of DIPNECH in the literature. Currently, our understanding is that DIPNECH has a predilection to nonsmoking females around their sixth decade of life. The patients usually present with chronic cough, dyspnea, and computed tomography (CT) showing multifocal pulmonary nodules with associated mosaic attenuation. The clinic history is largely driven by constrictive obliterative bronchiolitis, which typically has an indolent course with progressive respiratory decline and difficult to treat symptoms.

RECENT FINDINGS

DIPNECH has been found to be associated with carcinoid tumors. Recent data has found that symptomatic DIPNECH patients respond to somatostatin analog (SSA). SSAs provide improvement in symptoms and pulmonary function tests. According to small studies and case series SSAs can be used in conjunction with steroids and bronchodilators for the treatment of respiratory symptoms.

SUMMARY

DINPNECH is a premalignant condition that can transform into carcinoid tumors. Although the recent data suggest the potential efficacy of SSA, further studies are needed to validate such results in prospective fashion in addition to investigating other therapeutic agents.