1
|
Vogelmeier CF, Beeh KM, Schultze M, Kossack N, Richter LM, Claussen J, Compton C, Noorduyn SG, Ismaila AS, Requena G. Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence to Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: A German Claims Data Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:1835-1848. [PMID: 39140078 PMCID: PMC11321345 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s460903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience recurrent exacerbations. Multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is associated with poor adherence and persistence. This study assessed comparative adherence and persistence to single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) versus MITT among patients with COPD in a real-world setting in Germany. Patients and Methods This retrospective analysis using the WIG2 benchmark database identified patients with COPD newly initiating triple therapy with MITT or SITT (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] or formoterol/beclomethasone/glycopyrronium bromide [FOR/BDP/GLY]) November 2017-June 2019. Eligible patients were ≥35 years with 1 year's continual insurance prior to triple therapy initiation and no previous record of triple therapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) at 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment initiation; persistence (time until treatment discontinuation) was measured at 6, 12, and 18 months, with a gap of >30 days used to define non-persistence. Results Of 5710 patients included in the analysis (mean age 66 years), 71.4% initiated MITT and 28.6% initiated SITT (FF/UMEC/VI: 41.4%; FOR/BDP/GLY: 58.6%). Mean PDC was higher among SITT versus MITT users at all time points; at each time point, mean PDC was highest among FF/UMEC/VI users. During the first 6 months following treatment initiation, higher adherence was exhibited by FF/UMEC/VI (29%) and FOR/BDP/GLY (19%) users versus MITT users. Over the entire observation period, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of persistent patients; at 18 months, 16.5% of FF/UMEC/VI users were persistent versus 2.3% of MITT users. Conclusion Patients initiating SITT in Germany had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared with patients initiating MITT over 6 to 18 months following treatment initiation. Among SITT, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of adherence and persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus F Vogelmeier
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Schultze
- ZEG – Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Kossack
- WIG2 GmbH (Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung) - Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Lena M Richter
- WIG2 GmbH (Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung) - Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Stephen G Noorduyn
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Gema Requena
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuperus LJA, van der Palen J, Aldenkamp A, van Huisstede A, Bischoff EWMA, van Boven JFM, Brijker F, Dik S, van Excel JAJM, Goosens M, van Hal PTW, Kuijvenhoven JC, Kunz LIZ, Vasbinder EC, Kerstjens HAM, In 't Veen JCCM. Adherence to single inhaler triple therapy and digital inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a literature review and protocol for a randomized controlled trial (TRICOLON study). BMC Pulm Med 2024; 24:317. [PMID: 38965541 PMCID: PMC11225120 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03044-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication non-adherence is a significant problem in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Efforts to address this issue are receiving increased attention. Simplifying treatment by prescribing single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) as an alternative to multi-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) or with smart inhalers are often considered potential solutions. However, the actual impact of these innovations on adherence and clinical outcomes is unclear. METHODS To address this knowledge gap we first conducted a literature review focusing on two research questions: 1) the difference in adherence between SITT and MITT users in COPD, and 2) the effect of smart inhalers on adherence in COPD. Separate searches were conducted in PubMed and two authors independently assessed the articles. In addition, we present a protocol for a study to acquire knowledge for the gaps identified. RESULTS To address the first research question, 8 trials were selected for further review. All trials were observational, i.e. randomized controlled trials were lacking. Seven of these trials showed higher adherence and/or persistence in patients on SITT compared with patients on MITT. In addition, four studies showed a positive effect of SITT on various clinical outcomes. For the second research question, 11 trials were selected for review. While most of the studies showed a positive effect of smart inhalers on adherence, there was considerable variation in the results regarding their effect on other clinical outcomes. The TRICOLON (TRIple therapy COnvenience by the use of one or multipLe Inhalers and digital support in ChrONic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) trial aims to improve understanding regarding the effectiveness of SITT and smart inhalers in enhancing adherence. This open-label, randomized, multi-center study will enroll COPD patients requiring triple therapy at ten participating hospitals. In total, 300 patients will be randomized into three groups: 1) MITT; 2) SITT; 3) SITT with digital support through a smart inhaler and an e-health platform. The follow-up period will be one year, during which three methods of measuring adherence will be used: smart inhaler data, self-reported data using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) questionnaire, and drug analysis in scalp hair samples. Finally, differences in clinical outcomes between the study groups will be compared. DISCUSSION Our review suggests promising results concerning the effect of SITT, as opposed to MITT, and smart inhalers on adherence. However, the quality of evidence is limited due to the absence of randomized controlled trials and/or the short duration of follow-up in many studies. Moreover, its impact on clinical outcomes shows considerable variation. The TRICOLON trial aims to provide solid data on these frequently mentioned solutions to non-adherence in COPD. Collecting data in a well-designed randomized controlled trial is challenging, but the design of this trial addresses both the usefulness of SITT and smart inhalers while ensuring minimal interference in participants' daily lives. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05495698 (Clinicaltrials.gov), registered at 08-08-2022. Protocol version: version 5, date 27-02-2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz J A Cuperus
- Pulmonology Department, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- Pulmonology Department, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, and Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Groningen, the Netherlands.
- Pulmonology Department, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Job van der Palen
- Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud Aldenkamp
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erik W M A Bischoff
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert Brijker
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Stephan Dik
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn Goosens
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Zutphen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Th W van Hal
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Van Weel-Bethesda Hospital, Dirksland, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda C Kuijvenhoven
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Lisette I Z Kunz
- Department of Pulmonology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin C Vasbinder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- Pulmonology Department, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, and Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes C C M In 't Veen
- Pulmonology Department, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Pulmonology Department, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aggarwal B, Jones P, Casas A, Gomes M, Juthong S, Litewka D, Ong-Dela Cruz B, Ramirez-Venegas A, Sayiner A, van Hasselt J, Compton C, Tombs L, Weng S, Levy G. Association between Increased Risk of Pneumonia with ICS in COPD: A Continuous Variable Analysis of Patient Factors from the IMPACT Study. Pulm Ther 2024; 10:183-192. [PMID: 38446336 PMCID: PMC11282004 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-024-00255-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the proven benefits of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), clinicians limit patient exposure to ICS due to the risk of pneumonia. However, there are multiple factors associated with the risk of pneumonia in patients with COPD. This post hoc analysis of IMPACT trial data aims to set the risks associated with ICS into a context of specific patient-related factors that contribute to the risk of pneumonia. METHODS The 52-week, double-blind IMPACT trial randomized patients with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the prior year 2:2:1 to once-daily fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI), FF/VI or UMEC/VI. Annual rate of on-treatment pneumonias in the intent-to-treat population associated with age, body mass index (BMI), percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and blood eosinophil count (BEC) was evaluated. RESULTS This analysis revealed that the annual rate of pneumonia showed the lowest risk at the age of 50 years. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) between ICS-containing and non-ICS containing treatments diverged in ages > 63 years, suggesting a significantly increased ICS-related risk in older patients. In contrast, the annual rate of pneumonia rose in both groups below BMI of 22.5 kg/m2, but above that, there was no relationship to pneumonia rate and no differential effect between the two groups. The relationship between BEC and pneumonia was flat up to > 300/µL cells with ICS-containing treatment and then rose. In contrast, the rate of pneumonia with non-ICS containing treatment appeared to increase at a lower level of BEC (~ 200/µL). CONCLUSIONS There was little evidence of a differential effect of older age, lower BMI, lower FEV1 and BEC on the pneumonia rate between ICS-containing and non-ICS containing treatments. This analysis points to the need for a balanced approach to risk versus benefit in the use of ICS-containing treatments in COPD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION IMPACT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02164513.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhumika Aggarwal
- Emerging Markets, GSK, 23 Rochester Park, Singapore, 139234, Singapore.
| | - Paul Jones
- Global Medical, Regulatory and Quality, GlaxoSmithKline Plc., Brentford, UK
| | - Alejandro Casas
- AIREPOC (Integrated Care and Rehabilitation Program of COPD), Pulmonary Colombian Foundation, and El Rosario University, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Mauro Gomes
- Department of Pneumology at Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Samaritano-Higienopolis, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Siwasak Juthong
- Division of Respiratory and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Diego Litewka
- Unidad Neumonologia, Hospital Juan A. Fernandez, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Bernice Ong-Dela Cruz
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philippine Heart Center, Quezon, Philippines
| | - Alejandra Ramirez-Venegas
- Department of Research in Tobacco and COPD, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Abdullah Sayiner
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | - Gur Levy
- Emerging Markets, GSK, Panama City, Panama
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rothnie KJ, Wood RP, Czira A, Banks VL, Camidge LJ, Massey OKI, Seif M, Compton C, Sharma R, Halpin DMG, Ismaila AS, Vogelmeier CF. Outcomes of patients with COPD switching from multiple-inhaler to once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy in a real-world primary care setting in England: a retrospective pre-post cohort study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2024; 11:e001890. [PMID: 38772900 PMCID: PMC11110560 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT), single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) demonstrated improved lung function and meaningful improvements in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test score. This real-world study compared the effectiveness of switching patients with COPD in England from MITT to once-daily SITT with FF/UMEC/VI by evaluating rates of COPD exacerbation, healthcare resource use (HCRU) and associated direct medical costs. METHODS Retrospective cohort pre-post study using linked primary care electronic health record and secondary care administrative datasets. Patients diagnosed with COPD at age ≥35 years, with smoking history, linkage to secondary care data and continuous GP registration for 12 months pre-switch and 6 months post-switch to FF/UMEC/VI were included. Index date was the first initiation of an FF/UMEC/VI prescription immediately following MITT use from 15 November 2017 to 30 September 2019. Baseline was 12 months prior to index, with outcomes assessed 6/12 months pre-switch and post-switch, and stratified by prior COPD exacerbation status. RESULTS We included 2533 patients (mean [SD] age: 71.1 [9.9] years; 52.1% male). In the 6 months post-switch, there were significant decreases in the proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 moderate-to-severe (36.2%-28.9%), moderate only (24.4%-19.8%) and severe only (15.4%-11.8%) COPD exacerbation (each, p<0.0001) compared with the 6 months pre-switch. As demonstrated by rate ratios, there were significant reductions in exacerbation rates of each severity overall (p<0.01) and among patients with prior exacerbations (p<0.0001). In the same period, there were significant decreases in the rate of each COPD-related HCRU and total COPD-related costs (-24.9%; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION Patients with COPD switching from MITT to once-daily SITT with FF/UMEC/VI in a primary care setting had significantly fewer moderate and severe exacerbations, and lower COPD-related HCRU and costs, in the 6 months post-switch compared with the 6 months pre-switch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert P Wood
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Monica Seif
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | | | | | - David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Athanazio RA, Bernal Villada L, Avdeev SN, Wang HC, Ramírez-Venegas A, Sivori M, Dreyse J, Pacheco M, Man SK, Noriega-Aguirre L, Farouk H. Rate of severe exacerbations, healthcare resource utilisation and clinical outcomes in patients with COPD in low-income and middle-income countries: results from the EXACOS International Study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2024; 11:e002101. [PMID: 38637115 PMCID: PMC11029392 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The EXAcerbations of Chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and their OutcomeS (EXACOS) International Study aimed to quantify the rate of severe exacerbations and examine healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and clinical outcomes in patients with COPD from low-income and middle-income countries. METHODS EXACOS International was an observational, cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection from medical records for a period of up to 5 years. Data were collected from 12 countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Mexico, Panama, Russia and Taiwan. The study population comprised patients ≥40 years of age with COPD. Outcomes/variables included the prevalence of severe exacerbations, the annual rate of severe exacerbations and time between severe exacerbations; change in lung function over time (measured by the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)); peripheral blood eosinophil counts (BECs) and the prevalence of comorbidities; treatment patterns; and HCRU. RESULTS In total, 1702 patients were included in the study. The study population had a mean age of 69.7 years, with 69.4% males, and a mean body mass index of 26.4 kg/m2. The mean annual prevalence of severe exacerbations was 20.1%, and 48.4% of patients experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation during the 5-year study period. As the number of severe exacerbations increased, the interval between successive exacerbations decreased. A statistically significant decrease in mean (SD) FEV1 from baseline to post-baseline was observed in patients with ≥1 severe exacerbation (1.23 (0.51) to 1.13 (0.52) L; p=0.0000). Mean BEC was 0.198 x109 cells/L, with 64.7% of patients having a BEC ≥0.1 x109 cells/L and 21.3% having a BEC ≥0.3 x109 cells/L. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (58.3%). An increasing number of severe exacerbations per year was associated with greater HCRU. DISCUSSION The findings presented here indicate that effective treatment strategies to prevent severe exacerbations in patients with COPD remain a significant unmet need in low-income and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Abensur Athanazio
- Pulmonology Division, Heart Institute-InCor-Clinical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Sergey N Avdeev
- Department of Pulmonology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Hao-Chien Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Alejandra Ramírez-Venegas
- Tobacco Smoking and COPD Research Department, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosio Villegas, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Martín Sivori
- Pneumology Unit, Dr J M Ramos Mejía Pulmonology University Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jorge Dreyse
- Department of Internal Medicine and Critical Care Center, Clínica Las Condes and School of Medicine Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, Chile
| | - Manuel Pacheco
- Internal Medicine Research Group, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia
- Fundación Universitaria Visión de las Américas y Respiremos Unidad de Neumología, Pereira, Colombia
| | - Sin Kit Man
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), Tuen Mun, People's Republic of China
| | - Lorena Noriega-Aguirre
- Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Diseases (CEDITER), Panama City, Panama
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beeh KM, Rothnie KJ, Claussen J, Hardtstock F, Knapp RK, Wilke T, Czira A, Compton C, Ismaila AS. Characteristics of Users and New Initiators of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Germany. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:945-956. [PMID: 38646606 PMCID: PMC11032663 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s431291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess patient characteristics of users and new initiators of triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Germany. Patients and Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients with COPD and ≥1 prescription for single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT; fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] or beclomethasone dipropionate/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol [BDP/GLY/FOR]) or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT), using data from the AOK PLUS German sickness fund (1 January 2015-31 December 2019). The index date was the first date of prescription for FF/UMEC/VI or BDP/GLY/FOR (SITT users), or the first date of overlap of inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting β2-agonist, and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (MITT users). Two cohorts were defined: the prevalent cohort included all identified triple therapy users; the incident cohort included patients newly initiating triple therapy for the first time (no prior use of MITT or SITT in the last 2 years). Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were assessed on the index date and during the 24-month pre-index period. Results In total, 18,630 patients were identified as prevalent triple therapy users (MITT: 17,945; FF/UMEC/VI: 700; BDP/GLY/FOR: 908; non-mutually exclusive) and 2932 patients were identified as incident triple therapy initiators (MITT: 2246; FF/UMEC/VI: 311; BDP/GLY/FOR: 395; non-mutually exclusive). For both the prevalent and incident cohorts, more than two-thirds of patients experienced ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the preceding 24 months; in both cohorts more BDP/GLY/FOR users experienced ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation, compared with FF/UMEC/VI and MITT users. Overall, 97.9% of prevalent triple therapy users and 86.4% of incident triple therapy initiators received maintenance treatment in the 24-month pre-index period. Conclusion In a real-world setting in Germany, triple therapy was most frequently used after maintenance therapy in patients with recent exacerbations, in line with current treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kieran J Rothnie
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, UK
| | | | | | - Rachel K Knapp
- Real World & Advanced Analytics (RWAA), Cytel, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Wilke
- IPAM e.V., Institute affiliated with University of Wismar, Wismar, Germany
| | | | | | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Penizzotto M, López A, Wustten CS, Abratte V, Arias S. [Delphi Consensus of Argentine Pulmonologists on the Management of Patients with COPD in Real Life]. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2024; 6:100302. [PMID: 38444983 PMCID: PMC10912902 DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction COPD is the third cause of death globally and in Argentina COPD has a prevalence of 14.5%, but the management of patients in real life is unknown. The objectives of this work were: a) To know the opinions of pulmonologists in Argentina who manage patients with COPD in different aspects of daily practice. b) Compare our findings with specialists from Spain and c) Consider our results to plan future directives in the management of COPD in our country. Material and methods 89 pulmonologists from Argentina, experts in COPD, participated in a Delphi consensus, who responded to a survey with five domains. a) Adherence to treatment, b) Control of COPD, c) Treatable features, d) Inhalation devices and e) Accessibility to therapeutic resources. Results After two rounds of questions, total consensus was achieved in 77.6% of the statements and discriminating by domain: Treatment adherence: 5/9 (55.5%). COPD control: 10/14 (71.4%). Treatable traits: 6/6 (100%). Inhalation devices: 10/14 (71.4%) and Accessibility to treatment: 6/6 (100%). In most of the affirmations, the results were similar to those obtained by Spanish pulmonologists. Conclusions Pulmonologists from Argentina manage COPD patients in a similar way and with minimal differences with our Spanish colleagues. It became evident that, in daily practice, there are factors that negatively impact access to the indicated treatments. Our work could serve as a starting point to improve this situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Penizzotto
- Servicio de Neumonología, Sanatorio San Roque, Curuzú Cuatiá, Corrientes, Argentina
| | - Ana López
- Servicio de Neumonología. Hospital Privado, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Carlos S. Wustten
- Servicio de Neumonología, Hospital Gral. San Martín. Paraná, Ente Ríos, Argentina
| | - Vanesa Abratte
- Servicio de Neumonología. Hospital Privado, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Sergio Arias
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Emilio Coni, Santa Fe, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melani AS, Croce S, Fabbri G, Messina M, Bargagli E. Inhaled Corticosteroids in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Old, Unfinished History. Biomolecules 2024; 14:195. [PMID: 38397432 PMCID: PMC10887366 DOI: 10.3390/biom14020195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the major causes of disability and death. Maintenance use of inhaled bronchodilator(s) is the cornerstone of COPD pharmacological therapy, but inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are also commonly used. This narrative paper reviews the role of ICSs as maintenance treatment in combination with bronchodilators, usually in a single inhaler, in stable COPD subjects. The guidelines strongly recommend the addition of an ICS in COPD subjects with a history of concomitant asthma or as a step-up on the top of dual bronchodilators in the presence of hospitalization for exacerbation or at least two moderate exacerbations per year plus high blood eosinophil counts (≥300/mcl). This indication would only involve some COPD subjects. In contrast, in real life, triple inhaled therapy is largely used in COPD, independently of symptoms and in the presence of exacerbations. We will discuss the results of recent randomized controlled trials that found reduced all-cause mortality with triple inhaled therapy compared with dual inhaled long-acting bronchodilator therapy. ICS use is frequently associated with common local adverse events, such as dysphonia, oral candidiasis, and increased risk of pneumonia. Other side effects, such as systemic toxicity and unfavorable changes in the lung microbiome, are suspected mainly at higher doses of ICS in elderly COPD subjects with comorbidities, even if not fully demonstrated. We conclude that, contrary to real life, the use of ICS should be carefully evaluated in stable COPD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S. Melani
- Respiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (S.C.); (G.F.); (M.M.); (E.B.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beeh KM, Scheithe K, Schmutzler H, Krüger S. Real-World Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Symptomatic COPD: The ELLITHE Non-Interventional Trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:205-216. [PMID: 38249826 PMCID: PMC10800114 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s427770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Real-life effectiveness data on once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (odSITT) with the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF), the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC), and the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important to complement evidence from well-controlled randomized clinical trials. Effectiveness of odSITT was quantified by assessing health status and symptoms in usual care. Patients and Methods ELLITHE was a single-country (Germany), multicenter, open-label, non-interventional effectiveness study between 2020 and 2022, evaluating the effect of treatment initiation with FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg once-daily via the ELLIPTA inhaler on improvements in clinical outcomes versus baseline in COPD patients. The primary endpoint was the change in the total COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score between baseline and month 12. Key secondary endpoints included change in CAT score over time, occurrence of exacerbations until month 12, changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), inhaler adherence, and safety. Results Nine hundred and six patients were included (age 66.6 years, 55.6% male, mean FEV1 52.6% of predicted, mean CAT 21.5 units, 1.4 exacerbations/year pre-study). About 63.9% of patients were escalated from dual therapies, and 18% were switched from multiple-inhaler triple therapies. Reductions in CAT score at month 12 were statistically significant and above the threshold of clinical importance (-2.6 units; p < 0.0001). CAT score also improved at interim visits. CAT improvements were more pronounced in patients with high baseline scores and better inhaler adherence. Exacerbations during follow-up were rare (0.2 events/year) compared to pre-study (1.4 events/year). FEV1 was improved by 93 mL (p < 0.0001). No new safety effects were observed. Conclusion In usual care, treatment with odSITT resulted in significant and clinically relevant improvements of CAT score and FEV1 in COPD patients, regardless of the occurrence of exacerbations. These findings challenge the current guideline recommendations for SITT only in patients experiencing exacerbations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karl Scheithe
- Department of Biostatistics, GKM Gesellschaft Für Therapieforschung mbH, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Saskia Krüger
- Medical Department, BERLIN-CHEMIE AG, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bogart M, Bengtson LGS, Johnson MG, Bunner SH, Gronroos NN, DiRocco KK. Outcomes Following Initiation of Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Among Medicare Advantage with Part D Beneficiaries and Those Commercially Enrolled for Health Care Insurance in the United States. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:97-110. [PMID: 38226396 PMCID: PMC10789573 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s424497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been shown to benefit from triple therapy commonly delivered by multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT); however, the complexity of MITT regimens may decrease patient adherence. Fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), a once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT), became available in the United States (US) in 2017, but real-world data comparing outcomes for SITT versus MITT are currently limited. This study compared outcomes among patients with COPD initiating MITT versus SITT with FF/UMEC/VI who were either Medicare Advantage with Part D (MAPD) beneficiaries or commercial enrollees in the US. Methods Retrospective study using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database for patients with COPD who initiated FF/UMEC/VI or MITT between September 1, 2017, and March 31, 2019 (index date: first pharmacy claim for FF/UMEC/VI cohort; earliest day of ≥30 consecutive days-long period of overlap in the day's supply of all triple therapy components for MITT cohort). COPD exacerbations, adherence to triple therapy, and all-cause and COPD-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were compared between FF/UMEC/VI and MITT initiators. Results In total, 4659 FF/UMEC/VI initiators and 9845 MITT initiators for the MAPD population, and 821 FF/UMEC/VI initiators and 1893 MITT initiators for the commercial population were included in the study. MAPD beneficiaries initiating FF/UMEC/VI had a significantly lower annual rate of severe exacerbations compared to MITT initiators (0.26 vs 0.29; p=0.014). They also had a significantly higher mean adherence (proportion of days covered) (0.51 vs 0.37; p<0.001) and significantly lower all-cause and COPD-related inpatient stays compared to MITT initiators ([32.02% vs 34.27%; p=0.017], [16.09% vs 17.72%; p=0.037]). Trends were similar among the commercial population, but the results were not statistically significant. Conclusion FF/UMEC/VI initiators had significantly fewer severe exacerbations, higher triple therapy adherence, and lower HCRU costs compared to MITT initiators for MAPD beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bogart
- US Value Evidence & Outcomes, R&D US, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Mary G Johnson
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Scott H Bunner
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | - Noelle N Gronroos
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dijk L, Kerkhof M, Driessen M, Gerritsma YH, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Correia-de-Sousa J, Dekhuijzen PNR, Leving M, Price DB, Tsiligianni I, Usmani O, Kerstjens HAM, Kocks JWH. Does mixing inhaler devices lead to unchecked inhaler technique errors in patients with COPD? Findings from the cross-sectional observational MISMATCH study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2023; 10:e001821. [PMID: 38135462 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be prescribed multiple inhalers that require different techniques for optimal performance. Mixing devices has been associated with poorer COPD outcomes suggesting that it leads to inappropriate inhaler technique. However, empirical evidence is lacking. AIMS Compare the nature and frequency of dry powder inhaler (DPI) technique errors in patients with COPD using (1) a single DPI or (2) mixed-devices (a DPI and pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI)). METHODS Data from the PIFotal study-a cross-sectional study on Peak Inspiratory Flow in patients with COPD using a DPI as maintenance therapy, capturing data from 1434 patients on demographic characteristics, COPD health status and inhaler technique-were used to select 291 patients using mixed-devices. Frequency matching based on country of residence and DPI device type was used to select 291 patients using a DPI-only for comparison. Predetermined checklists were used for the evaluation of DPI video recordings and complemented with additional errors that were observed in ≥10%. Error proportions were calculated for the (1) individual and total number of errors, (2) number of critical errors and (3) number of pMDI-related errors. RESULTS The study sample contained 582 patients (mean (SD) age 69.6 (9.4) years, 47.1% female). DPI technique errors were common, but not significantly different between the groups. The majority of patients made at least one critical error (DPI-only: 90.7% vs mixed-devices: 92.8%). Proportions of total, 'pMDI-related' and critical errors did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSION The nature and frequency of inhaler technique errors did not substantially differ between patients prescribed with a single DPI and mixed-devices. Currently, 'pMDI-related errors' in DPI use are not accounted for in existing checklists. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ENCEPP/EUPAS48776.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Dijk
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan Kerkhof
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Merijn Driessen
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yoran H Gerritsma
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jaime Correia-de-Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | | | - Marika Leving
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David B Price
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, Health Planning Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Rethimno, Greece
| | - Omar Usmani
- Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- University Medical Center Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Czira A, Akiyama S, Ishii T, Wood RP, Camidge LJ, Wallis H, Jennison T, Wild RAC, Yarita M, Hashimoto K, Rothnie KJ, Ismaila AS. Benefit of Prompt Vs Delayed Initiation of Triple Therapy Following an Exacerbation in Patients with COPD in Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2933-2953. [PMID: 38089540 PMCID: PMC10715027 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s419119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is currently limited evidence for the optimal timing of triple therapy initiation in Japan, which is crucial for optimizing strategies for the effective treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study assessed the impact of prompt vs delayed initiation of triple therapy following a COPD exacerbation on clinical and economic outcomes in patients in Japan. Patients and Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients in the Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. database initiating triple therapy as single-inhaler triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol or budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol) or multiple-inhaler triple therapy within 180 days of a moderate-to-severe exacerbation (index). For the main analysis, patients were categorized as prompt or delayed initiators, initiating triple therapy within 0-30 days or 31-180 days of index, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores was used to adjust for measured confounders between prompt and delayed cohorts. Results For the main analysis, 610 (60.3%) and 402 (39.7%) patients were prompt and delayed initiators, respectively. The rate of subsequent moderate-to-severe exacerbations following index exacerbation was numerically lower in prompt vs delayed initiators (weighted rate ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1.21; P = 0.6603). Time-to-first subsequent moderate-to-severe exacerbation increased significantly in prompt vs delayed initiators (weighted hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.93; P = 0.0053). In patients indexed on a severe exacerbation, delayed initiation resulted in significantly higher 90-day all-cause readmissions vs prompt initiation (42.1% vs 30.6%; P = 0.0329 [weighted estimates]). Weighted healthcare resource utilization rates were numerically lower in prompt vs delayed initiators, and weighted direct costs (all cause and COPD-related) were significantly lower in prompt initiators. Conclusion This real-world study demonstrated that earlier initiation of triple therapy resulted in several benefits in clinical outcomes for COPD and may also reduce the economic burden of COPD management in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandrosz Czira
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Shoko Akiyama
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Ishii
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Robert P Wood
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | | | - Hannah Wallis
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | | | | | - Masao Yarita
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hashimoto
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kieran J Rothnie
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Turégano-Yedro M, Trillo-Calvo E, Navarro i Ros F, Maya-Viejo JD, González Villaescusa C, Echave Sustaeta JM, Doña E, Alcázar Navarrete B. Inhaler Adherence in COPD: A Crucial Step Towards the Correct Treatment. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2887-2893. [PMID: 38059011 PMCID: PMC10697822 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s431829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
COPD is a typical example of chronic disease. As such, treatment adherence tends to be as low as between 30% and 50%, with specific issues in COPD due to the use of inhaled therapies. Decreased adherence in COPD is associated with worse outcomes, with increased risk for exacerbations and long-term mortality. Factors that impact adherence are multiple, some related to patient, some related to clinicians and finally some related to healthcare system. Among clinician factors, prescription of simplified treatment regimens delivered by an inhaler adapted to the patient's characteristics is crucial. Although it has been observed a huge improvement in the design and usability of inhaler devices for COPD in the last two centuries, there is still a clear gap in this field. Smart inhalers as well as simplified treatment regimens could improve adherence and therefore improve long-term outcomes in COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fernando Navarro i Ros
- Centro de Salud Ingeniero J Benlloch, Valencia, Spain
- Red Investigadores SEMERGEN, Madrid, Spain
| | - José David Maya-Viejo
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Camas, Distrito Sanitario Aljarafe-Sevilla Norte, Camas, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Cruz González Villaescusa
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose Maria Echave Sustaeta
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esperanza Doña
- Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Ibs- Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bogart M, Abbott CB, Bangalore M, McMorrow D, Packnett ER, DiRocco K. Changes in Oral Corticosteroid Utilization in Patients with COPD Following Initiation of FF/UMEC/VI. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2367-2379. [PMID: 37933243 PMCID: PMC10625739 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s419272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Oral corticosteroids (OCS) play a role in the treatment of acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations; however, chronic use is not recommended due to the high rate of systemic complications, development of comorbidities, and increased mortality. Data assessing the real-world impact of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) on OCS utilization rates are limited. This study assessed the impact of FF/UMEC/VI on OCS use among patients with COPD previously treated with OCS. Patients and Methods A retrospective database study of patients with COPD aged ≥40 years who initiated FF/UMEC/VI from 1 November 2017 to 31 December 2018, identified through the MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Patients were required to have ≥1 dispensing of an OCS prior to initiation of FF/UMEC/VI (index) and were followed up for 12 months post-index. OCS utilization patterns, potential OCS-related adverse events, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs were compared between the 12-month pre- and post-index periods. Results A total of 2013 patients were identified (mean age 63.5 years, 55.7% female). The proportion of patients with ≥1 OCS claim decreased by 32.2% between the pre- and post-index period (67.8% vs 100%; p < 0.001). Comparing the post-index period to the pre-index period, mean number of OCS pharmacy claims per patient decreased from 3.3 to 2.5 (p < 0.001) and mean daily dose was reduced from 3.1 to 2.6 mg/day (p = 0.004); 30.0% of patients reduced their daily dose by 90-100%. Reductions were also seen in COPD-related HCRU. The proportion of patients with an inpatient admission for COPD decreased from 11.4% to 7.1% (p < 0.001), emergency room visits decreased from 23.1% to 17.4% (p < 0.001), and office visits from 97.5% to 90.1% (p < 0.001). Similar results were seen for all-cause HCRU. Conclusion Among patients with COPD with prior OCS use, FF/UMEC/VI initiation resulted in significant reductions in OCS utilization, COPD-related HCRU (including hospitalization), and all-cause HCRU.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bourbeau J, Bhutani M, Hernandez P, Aaron SD, Beauchesne MF, Kermelly SB, D'Urzo A, Lal A, Maltais F, Marciniuk JD, Mulpuru S, Penz E, Sin DD, Van Dam A, Wald J, Walker BL, Marciniuk DD. 2023 Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline on Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Stable COPD. Chest 2023; 164:1159-1183. [PMID: 37690008 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient care must include confirming a diagnosis with postbronchodilator spirometry. Because of the clinical heterogeneity and the reality that airflow obstruction assessed by spirometry only partially reflects disease severity, a thorough clinical evaluation of the patient should include assessment of symptom burden and risk of exacerbations that permits the implementation of evidence-informed pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. This guideline provides recommendations from a comprehensive systematic review with a meta-analysis and expert-informed clinical remarks to optimize maintenance pharmacologic therapy for individuals with stable COPD, and a revised and practical treatment pathway based on new evidence since the 2019 update of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Guideline. The key clinical questions were developed using the Patients/Population (P), Intervention(s) (I), Comparison/Comparator (C), and Outcome (O) model for three questions that focuses on the outcomes of symptoms (dyspnea)/health status, acute exacerbations, and mortality. The evidence from this systematic review and meta-analysis leads to the recommendation that all symptomatic patients with spirometry-confirmed COPD should receive long-acting bronchodilator maintenance therapy. Those with moderate to severe dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council ≥ 2) and/or impaired health status (COPD Assessment Test ≥ 10) and a low risk of exacerbations should receive combination therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ẞ2-agonist (LAMA/LABA). For those with a moderate/severe dyspnea and/or impaired health status and a high risk of exacerbations should be prescribed triple combination therapy (LAMA/LABA/inhaled corticosteroids) azithromycin, roflumilast or N-acetylcysteine is recommended for specific populations; a recommendation against the use of theophylline, maintenance systemic oral corticosteroids such as prednisone and inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy is made for all COPD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bourbeau
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Mohit Bhutani
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Paul Hernandez
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shawn D Aaron
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sophie B Kermelly
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anthony D'Urzo
- Primary Care Lung Clinic, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Avtar Lal
- Canadian Thoracic Society, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - François Maltais
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jeffrey D Marciniuk
- Respiratory Research Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Sunita Mulpuru
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Erika Penz
- Respiratory Research Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Don D Sin
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Joshua Wald
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Brandie L Walker
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Darcy D Marciniuk
- Respiratory Research Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mahler DA, Halpin DMG. Personalizing Selection of Inhaled Delivery Systems in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:1389-1396. [PMID: 37499210 PMCID: PMC10559134 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202304-384cme] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
It can be challenging for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to prescribe inhaled therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) because of the multiple individual and combinations of inhaled medications available in numerous delivery systems. Guidance on the selection of an inhaled delivery system has received limited attention compared with the emphasis on prescribing the class of the inhaled molecule(s). Although numerous recommendations and algorithms have been proposed to guide the selection of an inhaled delivery system for patients with COPD, no specific approach has been endorsed in COPD guidelines/strategies or by professional organizations. To provide recommendations for an inhaler selection strategy at initial and follow-up appointments, we examined the impact of patient errors using handheld inhalers on clinical outcomes and performed a focused narrative review to consider patient factors (continuity of the inhaled delivery system, cognitive function, manual function/dexterity, and peak inspiratory flow) when selecting an inhaled delivery system. On the basis of these findings, five questions are proposed for HCPs to consider in the initial selection of an inhaler delivery system and three questions to consider at follow-up. We propose that HCPs consider the inhaled medication delivery system as a unit and to match appropriate medication(s) with the unique features of the delivery system to individual patient factors. Assessment of inhaler technique and adherence together with patient outcomes/satisfaction at each visit is essential to determine whether the inhaled medication delivery system is providing benefits. Continued and repeated education on device features and correct technique is warranted to optimize efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald A. Mahler
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, New Hampshire; and
| | - David M. G. Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ismaila AS, Rothnie KJ, Wood RP, Banks VL, Camidge LJ, Czira A, Compton C, Sharma R, Millard SN, Massey O, Halpin DMG. Benefit of prompt initiation of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD in England following an exacerbation: a retrospective cohort study. Respir Res 2023; 24:229. [PMID: 37749551 PMCID: PMC10521462 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-023-02523-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple therapy is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who remain symptomatic despite dual therapy. The optimal timing of triple therapy following an exacerbation of COPD is unknown. The outcomes of prompt (≤ 30 days) vs. delayed (31-180 days) initiation of single-inhaler triple therapy with fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) following an exacerbation of COPD were examined. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of linked English primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data. Patients aged ≥ 35 years with COPD were indexed on the first and/or earliest date of exacerbation between November 15, 2017 and March 31, 2019 with subsequent FF/UMEC/VI initiation within 180 days. Patients were required to be continuously registered with a general practitioner for ≥ 12 months prior to and following index. Subsequent exacerbations, direct medical costs, and hospital readmissions were compared between prompt and delayed initiators. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for measured confounders between cohorts. RESULTS Overall, 1599 patients were included (prompt: 393, delayed: 1206). After weighting, prompt initiators had numerically lower moderate/severe exacerbations compared with delayed initiators (rate ratio: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.01, p = 0.0587). Both all-cause and COPD-related 30-day hospital readmissions were significantly lower among patients with prompt initiation compared with delayed initiators (all-cause: 23.6% vs. 34.6%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.58 [0.36-0.95], p = 0.0293; COPD-related: 20.3% vs. 30.6%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.58 [0.35-0.96], p = 0.0347). Prompt initiators also had numerically lower all-cause total costs and significantly lower COPD-related costs per-person-per year compared with delayed initiators (COPD-related: £742 vs. £801, p = 0.0016). CONCLUSION Prompt initiation of FF/UMEC/VI following a moderate/severe exacerbation was associated with fewer subsequent exacerbations, fewer hospital readmissions, and lower COPD-related medical costs compared with delayed initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, USA.
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Kieran J Rothnie
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, London, UK
| | - Robert P Wood
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Victoria L Banks
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
- Integrated Evidence Generation (Women's Health Care), Bayer PLC, Reading, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Shannon N Millard
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
- P1vital Limited, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Olivia Massey
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - David M G Halpin
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Halpin DMG. Clinical Management of COPD in the Real World: Can Studies Reveal Errors in Management and Pathways to Improve Patient Care? Pragmat Obs Res 2023; 14:51-61. [PMID: 37547630 PMCID: PMC10404047 DOI: 10.2147/por.s396830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Real world data comprise information on health care that is derived from multiple sources outside typical clinical research settings. This review focuses on what real world evidence tells us about problems with the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), problems with the initial and follow-up pharmacological and non-pharmacological management, problems with the management of exacerbations and problems with palliative care. Data from real world studies show errors in the management of COPD with delays to diagnosis, lack of confirmation of the diagnosis with spirometry, lack of holistic assessment, lack of attention to smoking cessation, variable adherence to management guidelines, delayed implementation of appropriate interventions, under-recognition of patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes, high hospitalisation rates for exacerbations and poor implementation of palliative care. Understanding that these problems exist and considering how and why they occur is fundamental to developing solutions to improve the diagnosis and management of patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M G Halpin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Klemmer A, Alter P, Vogelmeier CF. [COPD - what has changed in GOLD 2023 and is relevant for clinical practice?]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2023; 148:780-787. [PMID: 37257481 DOI: 10.1055/a-1997-1375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The annual report of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) is one of the most relevant documents covering prevention, diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 2023 edition contains a number of changes with impact on clinical practice. For assessment and categorization, a new patient group termed E based on individual exacerbation history has been introduced. The basis of pharmacological management for most patients is the use of combinations containing a long acting β2-agonist (LABA) and a long-acting anticholinergic (LAMA). Combinations of LABA and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are no longer recommended. When there is an indication for ICS therapy, a combination of LABA, LAMA and ICS should be used. For these triple combinations, a significant reduction of mortality could be demonstrated in selected patient populations. GOLD proposes a new definition and assessment of COPD exacerbations focussing on objectively assessible parameters and relevant differential diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Klemmer
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Intensiv- und Schlafmedizin, UKGM, Standort Marburg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Marburg
| | - Peter Alter
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Intensiv- und Schlafmedizin, UKGM, Standort Marburg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Marburg
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Intensiv- und Schlafmedizin, UKGM, Standort Marburg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Marburg
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lin L, Liu C, Cheng W, Song Q, Zeng Y, Li X, Deng D, Liu D, Chen Y, Cai S, Chen P. Comparison of treatment persistence, adherence, and risk of exacerbation in patients with COPD treated with single-inhaler versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy: A prospective observational study in China. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1147985. [PMID: 37025493 PMCID: PMC10072324 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1147985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study sought to compare treatment persistence, adherence, and risk of exacerbation among patients with COPD treated with single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) and multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) in the Chinese population. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective observational study. Patients with COPD from ten hospitals in Hunan and Guangxi provinces in China were recruited from 1 January 2020 to 31 November 2021 for the study and were followed up for one year. Treatment persistence, adherence, and exacerbation rates during the 12-month follow-up were analyzed in COPD patients treated with SITT and MITT. Results: A total of 1,328 patients were enrolled for final analysis, including 535 (40.3%) patients treated with SITT and 793 (59.7%) treated with MITT. Of these patients, the mean age was 64.9 years and most patients were men. The mean CAT score was 15.2 ± 7.1, and the median (IQR) FEV1% was 54.4 (31.2). The SITT group had a higher mean CAT score, more patients with mMRC >1, and lower mean FEV1% and FEV1/FVC than the MITT patients. Moreover, the proportion of patients with ≥1 exacerbation in the previous year was higher in the SITT cohort. SITT patients had, compared to MITT patients, a higher proportion of adherence (proportion of days covered, PDC) ≥0.8 (86.5% vs. 79.8%; p = 0.006), higher treatment persistence [HR: 1.676 (1.356-2.071), p < 0.001], lower risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation [HR: 0.729 (0.593-0.898), p = 0.003], and severe exacerbation [HR: 0.675 (0.515-0.875), p = 0.003], as well as reduced all-cause mortality risk [HR: 0.475 (0.237-0.952), p = 0.036] during the 12-month follow-up. Persistence was related to fewer future exacerbations and mortality than non-persistence in the SITT and MITT groups. Conclusion: Patients with COPD treated with SITT showed improved treatment persistence and adherence, as well as a reduction in the risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation, severe exacerbation, and mortality compared to patients treated with MITT in the Chinese population. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR-POC-17010431.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Lin
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Cong Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wei Cheng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Qing Song
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yuqin Zeng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xin Li
- Division 4 of Occupational Diseases, Hunan Prevention and Treatment Institute for Occupational Diseases, Changsha, China
| | - Dingding Deng
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated People’s Hospital, Shaoyang College, Shaoyang, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Department of Respiratory, The Eighth Hospital in Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shan Cai
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Morga A, Latimer NR, Scott M, Hawkins N, Schlichting M, Wang J. Is Intention to Treat Still the Gold Standard or Should Health Technology Assessment Agencies Embrace a Broader Estimands Framework?: Insights and Perspectives From the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen on the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E9 (R1) Addendum. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:234-242. [PMID: 36150999 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E9 (R1) addendum will have an important impact on the design and analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials, which represent crucial sources of evidence in health technology assessments, and on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle in particular. This article brings together a task force of health economists and statisticians in academic institutes and the pharmaceutical industry, to examine the implications of the addendum from the perspective of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG) and to address the question of whether the ITT principle should be considered the gold standard for estimating treatment effects. METHODS We review the ITT principle, as introduced in the ICH E9 guideline. We then present an overview of the ICH E9 (R1) addendum and its estimand framework, highlighting its premise and the proposed strategies for handling intercurrent events, and examine some cases among submissions to IQWiG and NICE. RESULTS IQWiG and NICE appear to have diverging perspectives around the relevance of the ITT principle and, in particular, the acceptance of hypothetical strategies for estimating treatment effects, as suggested by examples where the sponsor proposed an alternative approach to the ITT principle when accounting for treatment switching for interventional oncology trials. CONCLUSIONS The ICH E9 (R1) addendum supports the use of methods that depart from the ITT principle. The relevance of estimands using these methods depends on the perspectives and objectives of payers. It is challenging to design a study that meets all stakeholders' research questions. Different estimands may serve to answer different relevant questions or decision problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Morga
- Global Medical Affairs, Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Addlestone, England, UK.
| | - Nicholas R Latimer
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | | | - Neil Hawkins
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Jixian Wang
- Biometrics and Data Science, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boudry, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hanania NA, Bunner SH, Bengtson LGS, Ismaila AS, Bogart M. COPD Exacerbations, Costs, and Health Care Resource Utilization Before and After Initiation of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Routine Care in the USA. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:407-418. [PMID: 36998390 PMCID: PMC10045302 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s378867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine the impact of initiating fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in a single device on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, COPD exacerbation-related costs, and all-cause and COPD-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with COPD. Methods Retrospective database analysis of patients with COPD aged ≥40 years who initiated FF/UMEC/VI between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018 (index date: first pharmacy claim for FF/UMEC/VI), following evidence of multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) (≥30 consecutive days) in the year prior to index. COPD exacerbations, COPD exacerbation-related costs, and all-cause and COPD-related HCRU and costs were compared between the baseline period (12 months prior to and including index) and follow-up period (12 months following index). Results Data from 912 patients (mean [SD] age: 71.2 [8.1], 51.2% female) were included in the analyses. Among the overall cohort, mean count of total COPD exacerbations (moderate or severe) per patient was statistically significantly lower in the follow-up period compared to baseline (1.2 vs 1.4, p=0.001). The proportion of patients with ≥1 COPD exacerbation (moderate or severe) was also statistically significantly lower in the follow-up period compared to baseline (56.4% vs 62.4%, p=0.001). All-cause and COPD-related HCRU were similar during follow-up compared to baseline, although the proportion of patients with COPD-related ambulatory visits was lower during follow-up (p<0.001). COPD-related office visit costs, emergency room visit costs, and pharmacy costs were statistically significantly lower during follow-up compared to baseline (p<0.001; p=0.019; p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion In a real-world setting, patients on MITT who subsequently initiated FF/UMEC/VI in a single device had significant reductions in the rate of COPD exacerbations (moderate or severe). Switching to FF/UMEC/VI also resulted in improvements in some HCRU and cost outcomes. These data support the use of FF/UMEC/VI among patients at high risk of exacerbation to reduce future risk and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola A Hanania
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Correspondence: Afisi S Ismaila, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 1250 S. Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426-0989, USA, Tel +1 919-3158229, Email
| | - Michael Bogart
- US Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gessner C, Trinkmann F, Bahari Javan S, Hövelmann R, Bogoevska V, Georges G, Nudo E, Criée CP. Effectiveness of Extrafine Single Inhaler Triple Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Germany - The TriOptimize Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:3019-3031. [PMID: 36483674 PMCID: PMC9725928 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s382405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Real-word evidence on the effectiveness of switching from dual therapies or triple therapies (multiple inhalers) to extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy (efSITT), which consists of the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) beclomethasone, the long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) formoterol and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) glycopyrronium, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is limited. The impact of switching to efSITT on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), COPD specific symptoms, lung function and treatment adherence were assessed in routine clinical care. Patients and Methods Patients were recruited at 148 sites in Germany between 2017 and 2020 in this multicenter, non-interventional observational study. Demographics, clinical data and treatment history were collected at baseline. HRQoL (measured by COPD Assessment Test [CAT]), lung function and adherence (measured by Test of Adherence to Inhalers [TAI]) were assessed at baseline and after six months. Descriptive analyses were conducted by prior treatment and GOLD groups as well as for the overall population. Results 55.1% of the 2623 included patients were male. Mean age was 65.8 years. 57.5% of the patients were previously treated with ICS+LABA+LAMA (multiple inhalers), 23.9% with ICS/LABA (single or two inhalers) and 18.6% with LAMA/LABA (single or two inhalers). After six months, largest mean improvements in the total CAT score were observed in the ICS/LABA (-3.9) and LAMA/LABA (-3.9) prior treatment groups as well as in patients in GOLD group B (-2.9). In the overall population, the CAT items for cough, phlegm, and dyspnea decreased on average by -0.4 points each. After six months, FEV1 increased by 2.0 percentage points in relation to predicted values. The percentages of measured sRtot and RV of predicted values decreased by 24.5 and 4.4 percentage points, respectively. The percentage of patients with good adherence increased from 67.8% to 76.5%. Conclusion Treatment switch to efSITT resulted in an improvement of HRQoL, COPD specific symptoms, lung function parameters and adherence under real-world conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Gessner
- Pneumologische Praxis Leipzig, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Institut für Klinische Immunologie, Leipzig, Germany,Correspondence: Christian Gessner, Pneumologische Praxis Leipzig, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Institut für Klinische Immunologie, Tauchaer Straße 12, Leipzig, 04357, Germany, Tel +49 341 60 20 960, Email
| | - Frederik Trinkmann
- Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University Hospital Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Biomedical Informatics (DBMI) at the Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health Baden-Württemberg (CPD-BW), University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Elena Nudo
- Global Medical Affairs, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy
| | - Carl-Peter Criée
- Department of Sleep and Respiratory Medicine, Evangelical Hospital Goettingen-Weende, Bovenden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cho EE, Gershon AS. Single vs Multiple Inhaler Triple Therapy in the COPD Population. Chest 2022; 162:947-948. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
25
|
Halpin DMG, Kendall R, Shukla S, Martin A, Shah D, Midwinter D, Beeh KM, Kocks JWH, Jones PW, Compton C, Risebrough NA, Ismaila AS. Cost-Effectiveness of Single- versus Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy in a UK COPD Population: The INTREPID Trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:2745-2755. [PMID: 36317185 PMCID: PMC9617516 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s370577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The 24-week INTREPID trial demonstrated the clinical benefits of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus non-ELLIPTA multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) in patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of FF/UMEC/VI versus non-ELLIPTA MITT for the treatment of symptomatic COPD from a United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Patients and Methods The analysis was conducted using the validated GALAXY COPD disease progression model. Baseline characteristics, treatment effect parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 second and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score [derived from exploratory COPD Assessment Test score mapping]), and discontinuation data from INTREPID were used to populate the model. UK healthcare resource and drug costs (2020 British pounds) were applied, and costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. Analyses were conducted over a lifetime horizon from a UK NHS perspective. Model outputs included exacerbation rates, total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results by varying parameter values and assumptions. Results Over a lifetime horizon, FF/UMEC/VI provided an additional 0.174 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.024, 0.344) LYs (approximately 2 months), and 0.253 (95% CI: 0.167, 0.346) QALYs (approximately 3 months), at a cost saving of £1764 (95% CI: −£2600, −£678) per patient, compared with non-ELLIPTA MITT. FF/UMEC/VI remained the dominant treatment option, meaning greater benefits at lower costs, across all scenario and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Based on this analysis, in a UK setting, FF/UMEC/VI would improve health outcomes and reduce costs compared with non-ELLIPTA MITT for the treatment of patients with symptomatic COPD. SITT may help to reduce the clinical and economic burden of COPD and should be considered by physicians as a preferred treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK,Correspondence: David MG Halpin, University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK, Tel +44 01392 201178, Email
| | - Robyn Kendall
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Soham Shukla
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Alan Martin
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Dhvani Shah
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kai M Beeh
- Insaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands,Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore,Groningen Research Institute Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,Department of Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul W Jones
- Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, UK
| | | | | | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee CH, Kim MS, Yeo SH, Rhee CK, Park HW, Yang BR, Lee J, Cho EY, Xu X, Navarro Rojas AA, Shantakumar S, Milea D, Choi NK. Treatment patterns and cost of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using multiple inhaler triple therapy in South Korea. Respir Res 2022; 23:231. [PMID: 36064539 PMCID: PMC9446529 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-02136-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple inhaler triple therapy (MITT), comprising inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting beta-agonists (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), has been used as an escalation treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, real-world use of MITT has not been investigated in Asia, including South Korea. This study reports baseline characteristics of patients with COPD initiated on MITT in South Korea, and their treatment patterns. Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with COPD exacerbations following MITT initiation were also assessed. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using the South Korea National Health Insurance database (2014–2018). Included patients were ≥ 40 years, had a COPD diagnosis, were newly initiated on MITT and had ≥ 12 months’ data both before (baseline) and after index date (the first day with overlapping supply of all MITT components). Treatment immediately before initiation and immediately following discontinuation of MITT were identified, and proportion of days covered (PDC) by MITT was calculated. HRU and costs (per person per year [PPPY]) associated with exacerbations were identified following MITT initiation; costs were calculated using the average 2020 exchange rate (0.0008 USD/KRW). Results Among 37,400 patients, the mean age was 69 (SD 10) years and 73% were males; 56% had ≥ 1 COPD exacerbation during the baseline period, with a mean of 2 (SD 5) events/year. ICS/LABA was the most frequent regimen prescribed immediately before initiation (37%) and immediately following discontinuation (41% of 34,264 patients) of MITT. At 3, 6, and 12 months from treatment initiation, mean PDC was 81%, 63% and 49%, respectively; median treatment duration was 102 days. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) number of total visits for severe COPD exacerbations was 0.77 PPPY (0.75–0.78); mean PPPY total healthcare costs were 2093 USD. Conclusions Patients with COPD in South Korea experienced frequent exacerbations prior to MITT, and PDC by MITT was low. Patients may benefit from early optimization of COPD therapy, and greater emphasis on adherence to inhaled COPD therapy. Severe exacerbations were found to incur substantial costs; treatment alternatives that can reduce the rate of severe exacerbations are likely to minimize healthcare costs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02136-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Hoon Lee
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - See-Hwee Yeo
- Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin-Kook Rhee
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Heung-Woo Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.,Institute of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bo-Ram Yang
- College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Joongyub Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun-Yeong Cho
- MA Respiratory Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Xiaomeng Xu
- Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Dominique Milea
- Value Evidence & Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nam-Kyong Choi
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Halpin DMG, Rothnie KJ, Banks V, Czira A, Compton C, Wood R, Tritton T, Massey O, Wild R, Snowise N, Nikitin K, Sharma R, Ismaila AS, Vogelmeier CF. Comparative Adherence and Persistence of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in an English Real-World Primary Care Setting. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:2417-2429. [PMID: 36185170 PMCID: PMC9519012 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s370540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Correspondence: David MG Halpin, University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK, Tel +44 (0)1392 201178, Email
| | - Kieran J Rothnie
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Robert Wood
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | - Theo Tritton
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | - Olivia Massey
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | - Rosie Wild
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK
| | - Neil Snowise
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College, London, UK
| | - Kirill Nikitin
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, UK
| | | | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bakerly ND, Nikitin K, Snowise NG, Cardwell G, Freeman D, Saggu R, De Soyza A. Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in COPD and asthma: how to guide clinical practice. BMJ Open Respir Res 2022; 9:9/1/e001303. [PMID: 36180103 PMCID: PMC9528570 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of real-world evidence (RWE) studies, including pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs; randomised RWE studies), to aid the development of treatment guidelines, is gradually becoming a mainstay within clinical practice. RWE is an integral part of patient-driven decision-making and offers important value to add complimentary evidence to traditional RCTs; these provide a more well-rounded view of the benefits to patient-reported outcomes and improve the external validity of a given treatment versus findings from traditional RCTs alone. Discussions in recent scientific workshops explored the importance of pragmatic RCTs in optimising guideline development and patient care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. The Salford Lung Study in patients with COPD (NCT01551758) and asthma (NCT01706198) were the world’s first prelicence pragmatic RCTs that compared novel investigational treatments with existing COPD and asthma treatments and, more recently (2021), RWE studies have been used by the American Thoracic Society and the US Food and Drug Administration to support the approval of an immunosuppressant drug in patients receiving lung transplants. This highlights the importance of RWE data in supporting clinical guideline development and emphasises the advantages for the use of pragmatic RCTs in guiding clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nawar Diar Bakerly
- School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.,Salford Royal, NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | | | - Neil G Snowise
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, UK
| | | | - Daryl Freeman
- Norfolk Community Health and Care, Woodlands House, Norwich, UK
| | - Ravijyot Saggu
- Pharmacy Department, University College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anthony De Soyza
- Population and Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ismaila AS, Haeussler K, Czira A, Youn JH, Malmenäs M, Risebrough NA, Agarwal J, Nassim M, Sharma R, Compton C, Vogelmeier CF, Han MK, Halpin DMG. Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Triple Therapy Compared with Other Therapies for the Treatment of COPD: A Network Meta-Analysis. Adv Ther 2022; 39:3957-3978. [PMID: 35849317 PMCID: PMC9402726 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02231-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing triple therapies (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS], long-acting β2-agonist [LABA], and long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA]) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited. This network meta-analysis (NMA) investigated the comparative efficacy of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus any triple (ICS/LABA/LAMA) combinations and dual therapies in patients with COPD. METHODS This NMA was conducted on the basis of a systematic literature review (SLR), which identified RCTs in adults aged at least 40 years with COPD. The RCTs compared different ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations or an ICS/LABA/LAMA combination with any dual therapy (ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA). Outcomes of interest included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), annualized rate of combined moderate and severe exacerbations, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and SGRQ responders, transition dyspnea index focal score, and rescue medication use (RMU). Analyses were conducted at 24 weeks (primary endpoint), and 12 and 52 weeks (if feasible). RESULTS The NMA was informed by five trials reporting FEV1 at 24 weeks. FF/UMEC/VI was statistically significantly more effective at increasing trough FEV1 (based on change from baseline) than all triple comparators in the network apart from UMEC + FF/VI. The NMA was informed by 17 trials reporting moderate or severe exacerbation endpoints. FF/UMEC/VI demonstrated statistically significant improvements in annualized rate of combined moderate or severe exacerbations versus single-inhaler budesonide/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR). At 24 weeks, the NMA was informed by five trials. FF/UMEC/VI showed statistically significant improvements in annualized rate of combined moderate or severe exacerbations versus UMEC + FF/VI and BUD/GLY/FOR. FF/UMEC/VI also demonstrated improvements in mean SGRQ score versus other triple therapy comparators at 24 weeks, and a significant reduction in RMU compared with BUD/GLY/FOR (160/18/9.6). CONCLUSION The findings of this NMA suggest favorable efficacy with single-inhaler triple therapy comprising FF/UMEC/VI. Further analysis is required as additional evidence becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426-0989, USA. .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Alexandrosz Czira
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK
| | | | - Mia Malmenäs
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jatin Agarwal
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Maria Nassim
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, Munich, Germany
| | - Raj Sharma
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK
| | - Chris Compton
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.,German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - MeiLan K Han
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Alcázar-Navarrete B, Jamart L, Sánchez-Covisa J, Juárez M, Graefenhain R, Sicras-Mainar A. Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Persistence, and Outcomes Among Patients With COPD Treated With Single- or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis in Spain. Chest 2022; 162:1017-1029. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
31
|
Rothnie KJ, Joksaite S, Sansbury LB, Compton C, Di Boscio V, Ismaila AS. Characteristics of New Users of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy for COPD in Primary Care in England. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:1455-1466. [PMID: 35769225 PMCID: PMC9234193 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s338436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Inhaled triple therapy is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have poorly controlled symptoms and to reduce the risk of exacerbations. This study assessed the clinical characteristics of new users of single- and multiple-inhaler triple therapy (SITT and MITT) treated in a primary care setting in England. Patients and Methods This cross-sectional, observational study used data from an electronic health record database (CPRD Aurum) of COPD patients registered with a primary care practice in England, with linkage to a secondary care database. Patients were required to have initiated a new triple therapy (index) between November 2017 and November 2018 and have ≥12 months of available medical history prior to the index date. Results In total, 3536 patients initiated fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) SITT for the first time: 65% had a Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score ≥3, 45% had forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)% predicted <50%, and 64% had a moderate or severe exacerbation in the previous 12 months. The majority (83%) of new FF/UMEC/VI users had a history of MITT use. Immediately prior to FF/UMEC/VI initiation, 46% received MITT, 25% received an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), 12% received long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/LABA, and 14% stepped up directly from LAMA monotherapy. A second cohort of 6540 patients initiated triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for the first time. COPD severity (airflow limitation, exacerbation history) was worse among patients initiating SITT versus MITT. In the 12 months before triple-therapy initiation, ICS/LABA was the most common treatment; a step up from LAMA/LABA was more common among patients initiating FF/UMEC/VI (34%) or beclomethasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium bromide SITT (25%) than MITT (14%). Conclusion First-time triple therapy was frequently initiated in patients with COPD inadequately controlled on maintenance therapy. General practitioners in England generally identify appropriate patients who require initiation of triple therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran J Rothnie
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK
| | - Sandra Joksaite
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK
| | - Leah B Sansbury
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Chris Compton
- Global Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wu B, Mannino D, Mu G, Stiegler M, Bogart M. Patient and Clinical Demographics of New Users to Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Pulm Ther 2022; 8:195-208. [PMID: 35467260 PMCID: PMC9098773 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-022-00189-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2017 as a maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patient characteristics and treatment patterns prior to initiating FF/UMEC/VI are currently unknown. This study assessed patient characteristics, exacerbation, and medication history in patients with COPD before the initiation of FF/UMEC/VI or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT). METHODS This was a retrospective study using the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart. Patients who initiated FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy or MITT (consisting of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA], long-acting β2-agonist [LABA], and inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]) between October 2017 and September 2018, were enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans, were aged > 40 years, and had a COPD diagnosis were eligible. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, COPD medication use, exacerbations, and eosinophil counts were assessed in the 12-month baseline period prior to initiation of FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy or MITT. RESULTS The study population included 3933 FF/UMEC/VI users and 18,244 MITT users. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 72.2 (8.6) years in FF/UMEC/VI users and 70.7 (9.7) years in MITT users. Prior to initiating triple therapy, the majority of FF/UMEC/VI (89.1%) and MITT (93.8%) users experienced a moderate or severe exacerbation or used a COPD maintenance therapy during the baseline period. In addition, 41.2% of FF/UMEC/VI users received overlapping ICS/LAMA/LABA, 20.3% received ICS/LABA, and 9.7% received LAMA/LABA. CONCLUSION In this population of COPD patients, triple therapy was frequently initiated after previous maintenance medication use or an exacerbation, in line with treatment guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Wu
- GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, PO Box 13398, Durham, NC 27709-3398 USA
| | - David Mannino
- GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, PO Box 13398, Durham, NC 27709-3398 USA
| | - George Mu
- GlaxoSmithKline, UP Campus, 1250 S Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426 USA
| | - Marjorie Stiegler
- GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, PO Box 13398, Durham, NC 27709-3398 USA
- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, N2198 UNC Hospitals CB# 7010, Chapel Hill, NC 27599–7010 USA
| | - Michael Bogart
- GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, PO Box 13398, Durham, NC 27709-3398 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang L, Wang X, Zhang Y, Chen W. Efficacy and Safety of Single Inhaler Triple Therapy Versus Separate Triple Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Ther 2022; 44:859-873. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
34
|
Cazzola M, Rogliani P, Calzetta L, Ora J, Matera MG. A single inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol for the treatment of COPD. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:269-283. [PMID: 35475762 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2071700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with an inhaled corticosteroid, a long-acting β2-agonist, and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist is an effective and attractive therapeutic option codified in the recommendations of guidelines and treatment strategies for the management of COPD. AREAS COVERED : The preclinical and clinical development in COPD of fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) SITT and its use in the real world. EXPERT OPINION : Findings from phase III/IV trials and the use of FF/UMEC/VI in the real-world setting support the view that it may be a useful, safe, and cost-effective option for the maintenance treatment of COPD, especially when dealing with patients who are not adequately controlled with dual ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA therapy. Only direct head-to-head comparisons will be able to establish whether FF/UMEC/VI may be preferable to the other SITTs approved for COPD due to its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and especially the fact that it is the only one that can be taken once-daily. In addition, there is a need for further studies, especially in the real world, to optimize the positioning of FF/UMEC/VI in the treatment of COPD, also considering the availability of FF/VI and UMEC/VI and the need for better differentiation between the three treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Cazzola
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Rogliani
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.,Unit of Respiratory Medicine, "Tor Vergata" Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigino Calzetta
- Unit of Respiratory Diseases and Lung Function, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Josuel Ora
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, "Tor Vergata" Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Gabriella Matera
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gille T, Sivapalan P, Kaltsakas G, Kolekar SB, Armstrong M, Tuffnell R, Evans RA, Vagheggini G, Degani-Costa LH, Vicente C, Das N, Poberezhets V, Rolland-Debord C, Bayat S, Vogiatzis I, Franssen FM, Pinnock H, Vanfleteren LE. ERS International Congress 2021: highlights from the Respiratory Clinical Care and Physiology Assembly. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00710-2021. [PMID: 35615417 PMCID: PMC9125042 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00710-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
It is a challenge to keep abreast of all the clinical and scientific advances in the field of respiratory medicine. This article contains an overview of laboratory-based science, randomised controlled trials and qualitative research that were presented during the 2021 European Respiratory Society International Congress within the sessions from the five groups of the Assembly 1 - Respiratory clinical care and physiology. Selected presentations are summarised from a wide range of topics: clinical problems, rehabilitation and chronic care, general practice and primary care, electronic/mobile health (e-health/m-health), clinical respiratory physiology, exercise and functional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Gille
- Service de Physiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Paris Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
- Inserm U1272 “Hypoxia and the Lung”, UFR Santé – Médecine – Biologie Humaine Léonard de Vinci, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bobigny, France
| | - Pradeesh Sivapalan
- Section of Respiratory Medicine, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Georgios Kaltsakas
- Lane Fox Respiratory Service, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Centre of Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- 1st Respiratory Medicine Dept, “Sotiria” Hospital for Diseases of the Chest, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Shailesh B. Kolekar
- Dept of Internal Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Dept of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Matthew Armstrong
- Dept of Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
| | - Rachel Tuffnell
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rachael A. Evans
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre – Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Dept of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Guido Vagheggini
- Dept of Medical Specialties, Chronic Respiratory Failure Care Pathway, Azienda USL Toscana Nordovest, Volterra, Italy
- Fondazione Volterra Ricerche Onlus, Volterra, Italy
| | | | | | - Nilakash Das
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vitalii Poberezhets
- Dept of Propedeutics of Internal Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine
| | - Camille Rolland-Debord
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sam Bayat
- Service de Pneumologie et de Physiologie, CS10217, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm UA07 STROBE, Grenoble, France
| | - Ioannis Vogiatzis
- Dept of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Frits M.E. Franssen
- Dept of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, the Netherlands
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lowie E.G.W. Vanfleteren
- COPD Center, Dept of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Dept of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sansbury LB, Lipson DA, Bains C, Anley GA, Rothnie KJ, Ismaila AS. Disease Burden and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in England. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17:415-426. [PMID: 35264848 PMCID: PMC8901413 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s336158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Clinical guidelines for COPD management suggest pharmacologic treatment algorithms based on symptoms and exacerbation history. As previous research has suggested that prescribing patterns are not always aligned with these recommendations, this study investigated the burden of disease in patients with COPD receiving, and persisting on, new inhaled maintenance therapy. Patients and Methods This was a retrospective observational study using two linked electronic databases containing health records of patients in England. Patients aged ≥35 years with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD, and who initiated a new inhaled respiratory pharmacologic maintenance regimen between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016 (index date) were eligible for inclusion. New treatments could be long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) monotherapy, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA or LAMA/LABA dual therapy, or a multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT; LAMA/LABA/ICS). Patients were required to have 12 months of available medical history prior to, and after, the index date. Results In total, 25,350 eligible patients were identified, of these 8282 (mean age: 70.9 years; 51.5% male) persisted with their newly prescribed inhaled therapy for ≥12 months and were included in the analysis. In the 12 months prior to index, 54% of patients had moderate or severe dyspnea (Medical Research Council score ≥3). The most common therapy initiated at index was MITT (42%), followed by ICS/LABA dual therapy (31.2%). The proportion of patients with moderate or severe dyspnea in the post-index period ranged from 29.0% of patients receiving ICS to 64.2% of patients receiving MITT. In the post-index period, 48.1% of patients experienced ≥1 exacerbation and 54.9% had ≥5 general practitioner visits. Conclusion Many of the patients with COPD in our study continued to experience symptoms and exacerbations, despite persisting on the same treatment for ≥12 months. This suggests that some patients may benefit from treatment modification in accordance with guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah B Sansbury
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, Epidemiology, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - David A Lipson
- Respiratory Clinical Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chanchal Bains
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK
| | | | - Kieran J Rothnie
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Correspondence: Afisi S Ismaila, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426-0989, USA, Tel +1 919 315 8229, Email
| |
Collapse
|