1
|
Speel EJM, Dafni U, Thunnissen E, Hendrik Rüschoff J, O'Brien C, Kowalski J, Kerr KM, Bubendorf L, Sansano I, Joseph L, Kriegsmann M, Navarro A, Monkhorst K, Bille Madsen L, Hernandez Losa J, Biernat W, Stenzinger A, Rüland A, Hillen LM, Marti N, Molina-Vila MA, Dellaporta T, Kammler R, Peters S, Stahel RA, Finn SP, Radonic T. ROS1 fusions in resected stage I-III adenocarcinoma: Results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape project. Lung Cancer 2024; 194:107860. [PMID: 39002492 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND ROS1 fusion is a relatively low prevalence (0.6-2.0%) but targetable driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Robust and low-cost tests, such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), are desirable to screen for patients potentially harboring this fusion. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of ROS1 fusions in a clinically annotated European stage I-III LUAD cohort using IHC screening with the in vitro diagnostics (IVD)-marked clone SP384, followed by confirmatory molecular analysis in pre-defined subsets. METHODS Resected LUADs constructed in tissue microarrays, were immunostained for ROS1 expression using SP384 clone in a ready-to-use kit and Ventana immunostainers. After external quality control, analysis was performed by trained pathologists. Staining intensity of at least 2+ (any percentage of tumor cells) was considered IHC positive (ROS1 IHC + ). Subsequently, ROS1 IHC + cases were 1:1:1 matched with IHC0 and IHC1 + cases and subjected to orthogonal ROS1 FISH and RNA-based testing. RESULTS The prevalence of positive ROS1 expression (ROS1 IHC + ), defined as IHC 2+/3+, was 4 % (35 of 866 LUADs). Twenty-eight ROS1 IHC + cases were analyzed by FISH/RNA-based testing, with only two harboring a confirmed ROS1 gene fusion, corresponding to a lower limit for the prevalence of ROS1 gene fusion of 0.23 %. They represent a 7 % probability of identifying a fusion among ROS1 IHC + cases. Both confirmed cases were among the only four with sufficient material and H-score ≥ 200, leading to a 50 % probability of identifying a ROS1 gene fusion in cases with an H-score considered strongly positive. All matched ROS1 IHC- (IHC0 and IHC1 + ) cases were also found negative by FISH/RNA-based testing, leading to a 100 % probability of lack of ROS1 fusion for ROS1 IHC- cases. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of ROS1 fusion in an LUAD stage I-III European cohort was relatively low. ROS1 IHC using SP384 clone is useful for exclusion of ROS1 gene fusion negative cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst-Jan M Speel
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, MUMC+ Maastricht, Netherlands & Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Urania Dafni
- ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, ETOP Statistical Center, Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas & National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Erik Thunnissen
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Cathal O'Brien
- Department of Histopathology, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jacek Kowalski
- Pathomorphology Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Keith M Kerr
- Department of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary - NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Irene Sansano
- Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leena Joseph
- Department of Pathology, Lung Cancer Group Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Kriegsmann
- Department of Histopathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Atilio Navarro
- Department of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Pathology Department, NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wojciech Biernat
- Pathomorphology Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Andrea Rüland
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, MUMC+ Maastricht, Netherlands & Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lisa M Hillen
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, MUMC+ Maastricht, Netherlands & Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nesa Marti
- Translational Research Coordination, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Miguel A Molina-Vila
- Laboratory of Oncology, Pangaea Oncology, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tereza Dellaporta
- ETOP Statistical Center, Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - Roswitha Kammler
- Translational Research Coordination, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Solange Peters
- Oncology Department, CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rolf A Stahel
- President, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Stephen P Finn
- Department of Histopathology, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Teodora Radonic
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van den Broek D, Hiltermann TJN, Biesma B, Dinjens WNM, 't Hart NA, Hinrichs JWJ, Leers MPG, Monkhorst K, van Oosterhout M, Scharnhorst V, Schuuring E, Speel EJM, van den Heuvel MM, van Schaik RHN, von der Thüsen J, Willems SM, de Visser L, Ligtenberg MJL. Implementation of Novel Molecular Biomarkers for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands: How to Deal With Increasing Complexity. Front Oncol 2020; 9:1521. [PMID: 32039011 PMCID: PMC6987414 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnostic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is changing rapidly with the availability of novel treatments. Despite high-level healthcare in the Netherlands, not all patients with NSCLC are tested with the currently relevant predictive tumor markers that are necessary for optimal decision-making for today's available targeted or immunotherapy. An expert workshop on the molecular diagnosis of NSCLC involving pulmonary oncologists, clinical chemists, pathologists, and clinical scientists in molecular pathology was held in the Netherlands on December 10, 2018. The aims of the workshop were to facilitate cross-disciplinary discussions regarding standards of practice, and address recent developments and associated challenges that impact future practice. This paper presents a summary of the discussions and consensus opinions of the workshop participants on the initial challenges of harmonization of the detection and clinical use of predictive markers of NSCLC. A key theme identified was the need for broader and active participation of all stakeholders involved in molecular diagnostic services for NSCLC, including healthcare professionals across all disciplines, the hospitals and clinics involved in service delivery, healthcare insurers, and industry groups involved in diagnostic and treatment innovations. Such collaboration is essential to integrate different technologies into molecular diagnostics practice, to increase nationwide patient access to novel technologies, and to ensure consensus-preferred biomarkers are tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - T. Jeroen N. Hiltermann
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bonne Biesma
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Winand N. M. Dinjens
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nils A. 't Hart
- Department of Pathology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | - John W. J. Hinrichs
- Symbiant Pathology Expert Centre, Alkmaar, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mathie P. G. Leers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ernst-Jan M. Speel
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Ron H. N. van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jan von der Thüsen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefan M. Willems
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|