Effects of formoterol and salmeterol on resting inspiratory capacity in COPD patients with poor FEV(1) reversibility

COPD: maximization of bronchodilation

The most recent guidelines define COPD in a multidimensional way, nevertheless the diagnosis is still linked to the limitation of airflow, usually measured by the reduction in the FEV1/FVC ratio below 70%. However, the severity of obstruction is not directly correlated to symptoms or to invalidity determined by COPD. Thus, besides respiratory function, COPD should be evaluated based on symptoms, frequency and severity of exacerbations, patient's functional status and health related quality of life (HRQoL). Therapy is mainly aimed at increasing exercise tolerance and reducing dyspnea, with improvement of daily activities and HRQoL. This can be accomplished by a drug-induced reduction of pulmonary hyperinflation and exacerbations frequency and severity. All guidelines recommend bronchodilators as baseline therapy for all stages of COPD, and long-acting inhaled bronchodilators, both beta-2 agonist (LABA) and antimuscarinic (LAMA) drugs, are the most effective in regular treatment in the clinically stable phase. The effectiveness of bronchodilators should be evaluated in terms of functional (relief of bronchial obstruction and pulmonary hyperinflation), symptomatic (exercise tolerance and HRQoL), and clinical improvement (reduction in number or severity of exacerbations), while the absence of a spirometric response is not a reason for interrupting treatment, if there is subjective improvement in symptoms. Because LABA and LAMA act via different mechanisms of action, when administered in combination they can exert additional effects, thus optimizing (i.e. maximizing) sustained bronchodilation in COPD patients with severe airflow limitation, who cannot benefit (or can get only partial benefit) by therapy with a single bronchodilator. Recently, a fixed combination of ultra LABA/LAMA (indacaterol/glycopyrronium) has shown that it is possible to get a stable and persistent bronchodilation, which can help in avoiding undesirable fluctuations of bronchial calibre.

Extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol compared to fluticasone/salmeterol combination therapy in COPD

Background

The study evaluated the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) extrafine combination versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) combination in COPD patients.

Methods

The trial was a 12-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double dummy study; 419 patients with moderate/severe COPD were randomised to BDP/FF 200/12 μg or FP/S 500/50 μg twice daily. The primary objective was to demonstrate the equivalence between treatments in terms of Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) score and the superiority of BDP/FF in terms of change from pre-dose in the first 30 minutes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁). Secondary endpoints included lung function, symptom scores, symptom-free days and use of rescue medication, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, six minute walking test and COPD exacerbations.

Results

BDP/FF was equivalent to FP/S in terms of TDI score and superior in terms of FEV₁ change from pre-dose (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between treatments in secondary outcome measures, confirming overall comparability in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, a clinically relevant improvement (>4 units) in SGRQ was detected in the BDP/FF group only.

Conclusion

BDP/FF extrafine combination provides COPD patients with an equivalent improvement of dyspnoea and a faster bronchodilation in comparison to FP/S.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01245569

Efficacy and safety of inhaled formoterol 4.5 and 9 μg twice daily in Japanese and European COPD patients: phase III study results

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the long-acting β₂-agonist formoterol in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational phase III study randomized patients ≥ 40 years of age with moderate-to-severe COPD to inhaled formoterol 4.5 or 9 μg twice daily (bid) via Turbuhaler or placebo for 12 weeks. Salbutamol 100 μg/actuation via pMDI was permitted as reliever medication. The primary outcome variable was change (ratio) from baseline to treatment period in FEV1 60-min post-dose.

RESULTS

613 patients received treatment (formoterol 4.5 μg n = 206; 9 μg n = 199; placebo n = 208); 539 (87.9%) male; 324 (52.9%) Japanese and 289 (47.1%) European. End of study increases in FEV1 60-min post-dose were significantly greater (p < 0.001 for both) with formoterol 4.5 and 9 μg bid (113% of baseline for both) than with placebo, as were all secondary outcome measures. The proportion of patients with an improvement in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score of ≥ 4 was 50.2% for formoterol 4.5 μg (p = 0.0682 vs. placebo), 59.2% (p = 0.0004) for 9 μg, and 41.3% for placebo. Reduction in reliever medication use was significantly greater with formoterol vs. placebo (9 μg: -0.548, p < 0.001; 4.5 μg: -0.274, p = 0.027), with 9 μg being significantly superior to 4.5 μg (-0.274, p = 0.029). Formoterol was well tolerated with the incidence and type of adverse events not being different for the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Formoterol 4.5 μg and 9 μg bid was effective and well tolerated in patients with COPD; there was no difference between formoterol doses for the primary endpoint; however, an added value of formoterol 9 μg over 4.5 μg bid was observed for some secondary endpoints.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00628862 (ClinicalTrials.gov); D5122C00001 (AstraZeneca Study code).

Bronchodilator responsiveness and onset of effect with budesonide/formoterol pMDI in COPD

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are thought to have limited bronchodilator response, determined by changes in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)). In this study, we assessed bronchodilator response in patients with COPD using not only FEV(1) but also changes in lung volume expressed as forced vital capacity (FVC) and inspiratory capacity (IC). We also evaluated the speed of onset of bronchodilation.

METHODS

Data were from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (6-months [NCT00206154]; 12-months [NCT00206167]) in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

TREATMENTS

twice daily budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) 320/9μg, budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/9μg, formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) 9μg, placebo.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with FEV(1) improvement (≥12% and ≥200mL; American Thoracic Society [ATS] criterion) was 34-39% post-albuterol (screening). On day of randomization (DOR), a larger proportion receiving formoterol-containing treatment exhibited reversibility within 60min: FEV(1) (57-59%). Similar results were seen for IC (50-61%) and FVC (57-67%) using the same improvement criteria. The time to ≥15% FEV(1) improvement on DOR was 5.0, 4.8, and 7.3min for budesonide/formoterol 320/9, budesonide/formoterol 160/9, and formoterol, respectively. Time to ≥15% FEV(1) improvement was better maintained with budesonide/formoterol than formoterol at treatment end (6 and 12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with moderate to very severe COPD exhibit ATS-defined bronchodilator reversibility based on flow and lung volume measures after budesonide/formoterol pMDI or formoterol treatment. Budesonide/formoterol pMDI also has a rapid (within 5min) onset of bronchodilation that is maintained over time compared with formoterol alone.

Long-acting β-adrenoceptor agonists in the management of COPD: focus on indacaterol

Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment to improve airflow, symptoms, exercise tolerance, and exacerbations. There is convincing evidence that regular treatment with long-acting bronchodilators is more effective and convenient than treatment with short-acting bronchodilators. Long-acting β-2-agonists include the twice-daily drugs formoterol and salmeterol and, more recently, once-daily indacaterol. Studies with head-to-head comparisons of long-acting bronchodilators are scant, but novel data from controlled trials with the once-daily β(2)-agonist indacaterol indicate superior bronchodilation and clinical efficacy of indacaterol at recommended doses over twice-daily long-acting β(2)-agonists, and at least equipotent bronchodilation compared with once-daily tiotropium. The recent therapeutic developments in COPD underscore a shift from short-acting bronchodilators with multiple dosings per day to reduced dosing frequency and prolonged duration of action, including once-daily treatment, with more consistent effects on various clinical outcomes. This review summarizes relevant clinical data for twice-daily β-2-agonists in COPD, and further focuses on novel data for once-daily indacaterol, including head-to-head comparison trials.

The short, the long and the "ultra-long": why duration of bronchodilator action matters in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of symptomatic treatment for all chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity stages when administered on a regular basis to prevent or reduce symptoms and exacerbations. The principal inhaled bronchodilator treatments are beta-2 agonists and anticholinergics, used singularly or in combination. There is good evidence that regular treatment with long-acting bronchodilators is more effective and convenient than treatment with short-acting bronchodilators. Long-acting agents include the twice-daily beta-2 agonists formoterol and salmeterol, the once-daily anticholinergic tiotropium, and, more recently, the once-daily beta-2 agonist indacaterol. Long-acting bronchodilators have been shown to improve multiple clinical outcomes in COPD in comparison to short-acting agents including lung function, symptoms, dyspnea, quality of life, and exacerbations. Studies of head-to-head comparisons of long-acting bronchodilators are scant but indicate superior bronchodilation of tiotropium over salmeterol, while preliminary data from trials with the novel once-daily beta-2 agonist indacaterol indicate superior bronchodilation and clinical efficacy over twice-daily long-acting beta-2 agonists and at least equipotent bronchodilation as once-daily tiotropium. These recent therapeutic developments in COPD represent a change of paradigm with a shift from short-acting bronchodilators with multiple dosing per day to reduced dosing frequency and prolonged duration of action including once-daily treatment. This review summarizes relevant data and landmark studies comparing the efficacy of short-acting versus longer-acting bronchodilators in COPD, including new data for once-daily indacaterol, and discusses potential mechanism underlying the improved efficacy of long-acting versus short-acting bronchodilators.

Long-Acting Bronchodilator Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Objective:

To review clinical data on the use of long-acting bronchodilator agents as monotherapy and in combination for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Data Sources:

A literature search was performed via MEDLINE (1966–April 2008). In addition, references from publications identified were reviewed. These searches were limited to human data published in the English language. Searches used the following terms: COPD, long-acting β2-agonisls, long-acting anticholinergics, combination therapy, pharmacoeconomics, safety, tiotropium, salmeterol, and formoterol.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Relevant information on the pharmacology, safety, efficacy, pharmacoeconomics, adherence, and available agents used in the treatment of COPD was selected. Randomized clinical trials and retrospective reviews were included.

Data Synthesis:

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines provide general management recommendations to guide providers regarding treatment choices for COPD; however, they lack clarity regarding which long-acting bronchodilator to use and when combining agents becomes appropriate. Prospective trials evaluating short-acting anticholinergics and long-acting β2-agonists have utilized spirometric endpoints that relate most to short-term symptomatic relief. Tiotropium trials have focused more on patient-oriented outcomes, with data being reported for one year. Tiotropium significantly lowers exacerbation rates and improves health resource usage as well as health-related quality of life. Tiotropium also provides superior bronchodilation and improvement in dyspnea at all timo points, although onset of bronchodilation is slower than with long-acting β2-agonists. Combining these agents has been shown to decrease daytime rescue inhaler use, improve morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates, and improve bronchodilator efficacy compared with monotherapy. Pharmacoeconomic data lend support to the recommendation of tiotropium as a first-line long-acting agent.

Conclusions:

Tiotropium appears to be the best option as a first-line drug for patients with moderate-to-severe COPD because of its ability to sustain bronchodilator effect, improve quality of life, reduce COPD exacerbations, and reduce health resource usage. Patients who remain symptomatic may benefit from the addition of a long-acting β2-agonist to tiotropium monotherapy.

Formoterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Bronchodilators represent the hallmark of symptomatic treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). There are four categories of bronchodilators: anticholinergics, methylxanthines, short-acting β₂-agonists, and long-acting β₂-agonists such as formoterol. Significant research has been performed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of formoterol in the therapeutic field of COPD. Formoterol exhibits a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that observed with salbutamol, yet its long bronchodilatory duration is comparable to salmeterol. In addition, formoterol presents with a clear superiority in lung function improvement compared with either ipratropium bromide or oral theophylline, while its efficacy improves when administered in combination with ipratropium. Formoterol has been shown to better reduce dynamic hyperinflation, which is responsible for exercise intolerance and dyspnea in COPD patients, compared with other bronchodilators, whereas it exerts synergistic effect with tiotropium. Moreover, formoterol reduces exacerbations, increases days free of use of rescue medication and improves patients’ quality of life and disease symptoms. Formoterol has a favorable safety profile and is better tolerated than theophylline. Collectively, data extracted from multicenter clinical trials support formoterol as a valid therapeutic option in the treatment of COPD.

Resposta broncodilatadora imediata ao formoterol em doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica com pouca reversibilidade

OBJETIVO: Avaliar, por meio de provas de função pulmonar, a eficácia broncodilatadora do formoterol após 30 min de sua administração em portadores de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC) com pouca reversibilidade. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo incluindo 40 pacientes portadores de DPOC com resposta negativa ao broncodilatador de curta duração utilizado no teste espirométrico-variação menor que 200 mL e 7% do previsto do volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo (VEF1). Os pacientes encontravam-se nos estágios II, III ou IV da DPOC (Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia/Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) e apresentavam VEF1 < 70% do previsto. Foram randomizados em dois grupos de 20, com características clínicas semelhantes, e cada grupo recebeu formoterol ou placebo por meio de inalador de pó seco. As provas de função pulmonar (por pletismografia) foram repetidas após 30 min da administração de formoterol ou placebo. RESULTADOS: Observaram-se aumento significativo de VEF1 (p = 0,00065), capacidade inspiratória (p = 0,05) e capacidade vital forçada (p = 0,017) e redução significativa da resistência das vias aéreas (p = 0,010) no grupo formoterol, em comparação ao grupo placebo, assim como menor redução do volume residual e menor aumento da capacidade vital e da condutância específica das vias aéreas. CONCLUSÕES: Em portadores de DPOC com resposta negativa ao broncodilatador de curta duração utilizado no teste espirométrico, o formoterol levou a uma melhora significativa da função pulmonar após 30 min de sua administração. Estudos posteriores serão necessários para determinar se esse fármaco pode ser utilizado também como medicação de alívio imediato dos sintomas em DPOC.

Efficacy and safety of formoterol for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Formoterol is a selective long-acting beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist (LABA) that provides significant and sustained bronchodilatory effect for up to 12h following a single dose. The onset of effect is significantly faster with formoterol compared with an alternative LABA, salmeterol, although both have a similar duration of action. The overall efficacy of formoterol in improving lung function and controlling symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is comparable to that of salmeterol and potentially superior to that of ipratropium or theophylline. Formoterol provides additional benefit when administered in combination with other bronchodilators or inhaled corticosteroids. In clinical studies, formoterol was well tolerated and had an adverse-event profile similar to that of other beta2-adrenergic receptor agonists. Formoterol is a rapidly acting, well-tolerated, effective beta2-adrenergic receptor agonist that can be regularly used as a long-acting bronchodilator for patients with moderate to severe COPD, as per recommendations of the current treatment guidelines.

Fast onset of effect of budesonide/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and reversible airway obstruction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Data on the onset of action of COPD medications are lacking. This study compared the onset of bronchodilation following different inhaled therapies in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and reversible airway obstruction.

METHODS

In this double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study, 90 patients (aged >or=40 years; FEV(1) 30-70% predicted) were randomized to a single dose (two inhalations) of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, salmeterol/fluticasone 25/250 microg, salbutamol 100 microg or placebo (via pressurized metered-dose inhalers) on four visits. The primary end-point was change in FEV(1) 5 min after drug inhalation; secondary end-points included inspiratory capacity (IC) and perception of onset of effect.

RESULTS

Budesonide/formoterol significantly improved FEV(1) at 5 min compared with placebo (P < 0.0001) and salmeterol/fluticasone (P = 0.0001). Significant differences were first observed at 3 min. Onset of effect was similar with budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol. Improvements in FEV(1) following active treatments were superior to placebo after 180 min (all P < 0.0001); both combinations were better than salbutamol at maintaining FEV(1) improvements (P <or= 0.0001) at 180 min. Active treatments improved IC at 15 and 185 min compared with placebo (P < 0.0001). Maximal IC was greater with budesonide/formoterol than salmeterol/fluticasone (P = 0.0184) at 65 min. Patients reported a positive response to the perceptions of the onset of effect question shortly after receiving active treatments (median time to onset 5 min for active treatments vs 20 min for placebo), with no significant difference between active treatments.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide/formoterol has an onset of bronchodilatory effect in patients with COPD and reversible airway obstruction that is faster than salmeterol/fluticasone and similar to salbutamol.

Disease modification in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease in which patients experience a progressive decline in lung function, worsening exercise capacity, and frequent exacerbations. Based on clinical evidence, the progression of COPD could be modified by focus on earlier diagnosis; risk reduction through smoking cessation; symptom reduction with pharmacotherapy, improving health-related quality of life, and pulmonary rehabilitation; and decreasing complications by reducing exacerbations. Smoking cessation has been shown to slow lung function decline and reduce mortality, including deaths due to cardiovascular disease, lung cancer, and other respiratory disease (including COPD).

Clinical course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: review of therapeutic interventions

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease in which patients experience a progressive decline in lung function. Based on clinical evidence, the management of COPD should focus on (1) earlier diagnosis; (2) risk reduction through smoking cessation, decreased exposure to inhaled irritants, and immunization against respiratory pathogens; (3) symptom reduction with pharmacotherapy and pulmonary rehabilitation; (4) decreasing complications by reducing exacerbations and improving pulmonary function; and (5) improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Smoking cessation has been shown to slow lung function decline and to reduce mortality--including deaths due to lung cancer, other respiratory disease (including COPD), and cardiovascular disease. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) and the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) guidelines advocate interventions according to the severity of COPD and recommend initiation of maintenance long-acting bronchodilator therapy in patients with moderate disease. However, recent evidence from a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials of tiotropium suggests that initiation of long-acting bronchodilator therapy at earlier stages of disease may also provide improvements in lung function and HRQOL. The results of ongoing long-term studies may soon provide evidence that in addition to relieving symptoms and improving patient HRQOL, specific pharmacologic therapies may also alter the clinical course of COPD.

Is a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator the first agent to use in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews findings from recently published randomized controlled clinical trials to address the question whether a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator should be the initial choice for maintenance therapy in patients with stable, symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Results of recent clinical trials suggest that a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator, either once-daily tiotropium or twice-daily salmeterol or formoterol, has advantages over a regularly-scheduled short-acting anticholinergic inhaled bronchodilator (ipratropium) as initial maintenance therapy in patients with at least moderate, stable, symptomatic COPD (forced expired volume in 1 second </= 60-70% predicted; mean, approximately 37-45% predicted). For tiotropium, these advantages encompass several important outcomes, including lung function, rescue inhaler use, dyspnea, frequency of exacerbations, and hospitalization for COPD, in addition to greater convenience and therefore potentially better adherence to prescribed therapy, whereas side effects are similar except for a greater incidence of dry mouth.

SUMMARY

Current evidence supports the recommendation of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines of at least one of the two classes of long-acting inhaled bronchodilators as initial maintenance therapy for symptomatic COPD. In patients who do not respond satisfactorily to tiotropium or a long-acting inhaled beta-agonist as the initially prescribed single maintenance agent, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines recommend the addition of the alternate class of long-acting inhaled bronchodilator as the next step. Further clinical trials are required to investigate whether this recommendation is preferable to that of adding an inhaled corticosteroid, which has been shown to have additive benefits to those of a long-acting beta-agonist with respect to bronchodilation and, variably, dyspnea, rescue bronchodilator use, and quality of life. The choice of agents will depend ultimately on how well the patient responds to a trial of the drug in terms of both efficacy and side effects, and patient preference and cost.

The Rationale for Pharmacologic Therapy in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The structural changes in airways and alveoli that characterize chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) result from an abnormal and persistent inflammatory reaction to inhaled noxious particles or gases, notably tobacco smoke. This remodeling of the lung leads to irreversible airflow obstruction. However, COPD should be viewed by clinicians as a treatable condition, since most patients with COPD have an additional reversible component related to increased bronchomotor tone. The use of bronchodilators, especially anticholinergics and beta2-agonists, results in a reduction in airway smooth muscle tone and airflow resistance; this translates into marked improvement in significant clinical outcomes such as dyspnea, quality of life, and exercise capacity. An increasing amount of evidence supports the idea that long-acting agents have more significant impact in these parameters than the short-acting preparations.