Pharmacokinetic simulation for switching from galantamine immediate-release to extended-release formulation

[Current approaches to optimize treatment of dementia and Alzheimer's disease]

Currently, substitution therapy is the main focus in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is aimed at overcoming neurotransmitter deficits in a variety of neuronal systems affected in AD. To overcome the cholinergic insufficiency, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine, donepezil and galantamine) are primarily used. The efficacy and safety of these drugs in AD have been convincingly shown in numerous clinical trials in different countries. Memantine is the main drug in glutamatergic strategies in the treatment of AD, which has a neuroprotective effect and relieves symptoms at the level of the remaining glutamatergic synapses. Some other formulations (cerebrolysin, nicergoline etc) can be also applied as vasoactive and neuroprotective agents.

A practical algorithm for managing Alzheimer's disease: what, when, and why?

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and its prevalence is increasing. Recent developments in AD management provide improved ways of supporting patients and their caregivers throughout the disease continuum. Managing cardiovascular risk factors, maintaining an active lifestyle (with regular physical, mental and social activity) and following a Mediterranean diet appear to reduce AD risk and may slow cognitive decline. Pharmacologic therapy for AD should be initiated upon diagnosis. All of the currently available cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs; donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) are indicated for mild-to-moderate AD. Donepezil (10 and 23 mg/day) and rivastigmine transdermal patch (13.3 mg/24 h) are indicated for moderate-to-severe AD. Memantine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, is approved for moderate-to-severe AD. ChEIs have been shown to improve cognitive function, global clinical status and patients' ability to perform activities of daily living. There is also evidence for reduction in emergence of behavioral symptoms with ChEI therapy. Treatment choice (e.g., oral vs. transdermal) should be based on patient or caregiver preference, ease of use, tolerability, and cost. Treatment should be individualized; patients can be switched from one ChEI to another if the initial agent is poorly tolerated or ineffective. Memantine may be introduced in moderate-to-severe disease stages. Clinicians will regularly monitor symptoms and behaviors, manage comorbidities, assess function, educate and help caregivers access information and support, evaluate patients' fitness to drive or own firearms, and provide advice about the need for legal and financial planning. Review of caregiver well-being and prompt referral for support is vital.

Galantamine: an update

SUMMARY Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that impairs cognitive function. Currently, the main purpose of pharmacological treatment is to slow down the progression by relieving its symptoms. Galantamine is one of the three cholinesterase inhibitors that are commonly used, either alone or in conjunction with memantine, to treat AD. Four fixed-dose pivotal trials with the immediate-release form and one with the extended-release form established its effectiveness in treating mild-to-moderate AD, without causing excessive adverse events. Both forms possess similar efficacy, but the extended-release form has better compliance.

Drug delivery strategies for Alzheimer's disease treatment

INTRODUCTION

Current Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapy is based on the administration of the drugs donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine. Until disease-modifying therapies become available, further research is needed to develop new drug delivery strategies to ensure ease of administration and treatment persistence.

AREAS COVERED

In addition to the conventional oral formulations, a variety of drug delivery strategies applied to the treatment of AD are reviewed in this paper, with a focus on strategies leading to simplified dosage regimens and to providing new pharmacological tools. Alternatives include extended release, orally disintegrating or sublingual formulations, intranasal or short- and long-acting intramuscular or transdermal forms, and nanotechnology-based delivery systems.

EXPERT OPINION

The advent of new research on molecular mechanisms of AD pathogenesis has outlined new strategies for therapeutic intervention; these include the stimulation of α-secretase cleavage, the inhibition of γ-secretase activity, the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, neuroprotection based on antioxidant therapy, the use of estrogens, NO synthetase inhibitors, and natural agents such as polyphenols. Unfortunately, these compounds might not help patients with end stage AD, but might hopefully slow or stop the disease process in its early stage. Nanotechnologies may prove to be a promising contribution in future AD drug delivery strategies, in particular drug carrier nano- or microsystems, which can limit the side effects of anti-Alzheimer drugs.

Refinement of the population pharmacokinetic model for the monoclonal antibody matuzumab: external model evaluation and simulations

OBJECTIVES

A developed population pharmacokinetic model of the humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) matuzumab was evaluated by external evaluation. Based on the estimates of the final model, simulations of different dosing regimens and the covariate effect were performed.

METHODS

The development dataset included 90 patients, and the evaluation dataset included 81 patients; the two sets of patients were from three different studies. In all studies, the patients had different types of advanced carcinoma - mainly colon, rectal and pancreatic cancer. They received matuzumab as multiple 1-hour intravenous infusions in a wide range of dosing regimens (development dataset: from 400 mg every 3 weeks to 2000 mg in the first week followed by 1600 mg weekly; evaluation dataset: from 100 mg weekly to 800 mg weekly). In addition to 1256 serum mAb concentrations for model development, there were 1124 concentrations available for model evaluation. Serum concentration-time data were simultaneously fitted using NONMEM software. The developed two-compartment model - with the parameters central volume of distribution (V(1)) and peripheral volume of distribution (V(2)), intercompartmental clearance and linear clearance (CLL), an additional nonlinear elimination pathway (Michaelis-Menten constant: the concentration with the half-maximal elimination rate and V(max): the maximum elimination rate) and covariate relations - was evaluated by an external dataset. Different simulation scenarios were performed to demonstrate the impact of the incorporated covariate effect and the influence of different dosing regimens and dosing strategies on the concentration-time profiles.

RESULTS

The developed model included the covariate fat-free mass (FFM) on V(1) and on CLL. The evaluation did not support the covariate FFM on V(1) and, after deletion of this covariate, the model parameters of the refined model were estimated. The model showed good precision for all parameters: the relative standard errors (RSEs) were <42% for the development dataset and < or = 51% for the evaluation dataset (excluding the higher RSEs for the correlation between V(2) and V(max) and the interindividual variability on V(2) for the evaluation dataset). The model showed good robustness for the ability to estimate highly precise parameters for the combined dataset of 171 patients (RSE <29%). Simulations revealed that variability in concentration-time profiles for minimum and maximum steady-state concentrations was reduced to a marginal extent by a proposed dose adaptation.

CONCLUSION

The population pharmacokinetic model for matuzumab was improved by evaluation with an external dataset. The new model obtained precise parameter estimates and demonstrated robustness. After correlation with efficacy data simulation results in particular could serve as a tool to guide dose selection for this 'targeted' cancer therapy.

Novel regimens and delivery systems in the pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease

The mainstay of current management of patients with Alzheimer's disease involves drugs that provide symptomatic therapy. Research approaches for future therapy of Alzheimer's disease are focusing on disease modifying and/or preventive approaches. Two classes of medications have been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: the cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine), mostly for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, and the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist memantine for the moderate to severe stages of Alzheimer's disease. Management of comorbid medical problems can be more complex in patients with dementia than in those without dementia. Unfortunately, medication adherence in Alzheimer's disease is low and good adherence is essential for attempting to slow disease progression and improve or stabilize quality of life. Simplifying treatment regimens and providing more caregiver- and patient-friendly modes of administration that fit in better with daily routines can ease caregiver stress which, in turn, may have a favourable impact on the patient's condition. To overcome problems of medication adherence in the elderly, simple, user-friendly dosage regimens should be prescribed for all medications; thus the need for novel regimens and delivery systems in the pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease, such as once-daily donepezil, memantine and galantamine, and transdermal rivastigmine.

Pharmacokinetic model and simulations of dose conversion from immediate- to extended-release tramadol

OBJECTIVE

Extended-release tramadol (tramadol ER) is a once-daily formulation of tramadol approved in the United States for moderate to moderately severe chronic pain in adults. This modeling and simulation analysis was conducted to support dosing recommendations for switching patients receiving immediate-release tramadol (tramadol IR) to tramadol ER.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations based on steady-state data from three Phase 1 studies predicted minimum plasma concentration (C(min)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve (AUC).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between 100-mg daily increments of tramadol ER every 24 h (Q24H) and corresponding 25-mg increments of tramadol IR every 6 h (Q6H), such as tramadol ER 200 mg Q24H versus tramadol IR 200, 225, 250, and 275 mg daily.

RESULTS

Tramadol ER and IR were predicted to provide similar exposure (AUC) at a total daily dose of 100, 200, or 300 mg. Estimated exposure was comparable between tramadol IR 125-, 225-, and 325-mg and tramadol ER 100-, 200-, and 300-mg, respectively. Estimated exposure was 30-41% lower with tramadol ER 100 mg versus tramadol IR 150 and 175 mg daily, 15-26% lower with tramadol ER 200 mg versus tramadol IR 250 and 275 mg daily, and 8-19% lower with tramadol ER 300 mg versus tramadol IR 350 and 375 mg daily.

CONCLUSIONS

This pharmacokinetic analysis supports switching patients from a total daily dose of tramadol IR 200 or 300 mg directly to tramadol ER 200 and 300 mg once daily, respectively. Patients who take other doses of tramadol IR may switch to the next lower 100-mg increment of tramadol ER (e.g., from tramadol IR 225, 250, or 275 mg daily in divided doses to tramadol ER 200 mg once daily). Confirmation of these findings would require clinical studies comparing the systemic exposure of tramadol upon switching from the IR to the ER formulation.

Galantamine extended release

Galantamine inhibits acetylcholinesterase (AChE) to slow acetylcholine hydrolysis, and may also modulate presynaptic nicotinic receptor activation, thereby increasing neurotransmitter concentrations in the synaptic cleft.black triangle Once-daily galantamine extended release (ER) 24 mg and twice-daily galantamine immediate release (IR) 12 mg are bioequivalent in terms of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours and steady-state minimum plasma concentration.black triangle Primary endpoints indicated a significantly greater effect of galantamine ER on cognitive performance than placebo, with efficacy similar to galantamine IR, in a randomised, double-blind trial. While galantamine ER did not show a significant effect on the coprimary endpoint of global change, neither did galantamine IR in this study. Exploratory post hoc analyses of global change correcting for study centre and prognostic factors associated with response (baseline Mini-Mental State Examination, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive score, prior cholinomimetic use) indicated nominal significance in the galantamine ER treatment arm. Secondary endpoints indicated an improvement in activities of daily living and memory- and nonmemory-dependent measures of cognitive performance, but not in measures of behaviour or dichotomised rating of global change. Adverse events occurred in similar proportions of galantamine ER, galantamine IR and placebo recipients.