A pharmacokinetic study investigating the rate of absorption of a 500 mg dose of a rapidly absorbed paracetamol tablet and a standard paracetamol tablet

Direct visualizing of paracetamol immediate release tablet disintegration in vivo and in vitro

The purpose of the present study was to study tablet disintegration by direct visualization, in vivo and in vitro. Based on literature data, a standard conventional paracetamol (CP) tablet, Panodil®, and a rapidly absorbed paracetamol (RP) tablet, Panodil® Zapp, were chosen as model systems to study tablet disintegration in the human stomach. Based on the obtained in vivo results, an in vitro disintegration method was designed to reproduce the visualized disintegration process occurring in the human stomach. For the clinical study, CP and RP tablets fastened to digital endoscopic camera capsules were administered to fasted human volunteers (n=4). The disintegration time and process were visualized by the real time video recordings, using the endoscopic camera capsule. The average disintegration time was found to be 26 ± 13 min and 10 ± 7 min, for CP (n=4) and RP (n=4) tablets, respectively. It was possible to reproduce the in vivo disintegration data in vitro using a USP 2 dissolution apparatus with 250 mL of viscous Fasted State Simulated Gastric Fluid (vFaSSGF*), simulating the rheological profile of human fasted state gastric fluid following administration of a glass of water. The viscosity of the simulated fasted state gastric fluid was found to have a large impact on the disintegration time of the tested immediate release tablets. Therefore, it is recommended to mimic gastric fluid viscosity during in vitro tablet disintegration studies.

COMPARATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF SINGLE-DOSE PREOPERATIVE ADMINISTRATION OF PARACETAMOL (ACETAMINOPHEN) 500 mg PLUS CODEINE 30 mg AND IBUPROFEN 400 mg ON PAIN AFTER THIRD MOLAR SURGERY

BACKGROUND

Efficacy and rapid onset of postsurgical oral pain relief are critical to improve clinical outcomes and reduce the risk of excessive dosing with analgesic drugs.

PURPOSE

To compare analgesic effects of preoperative administration of paracetamol 500 mg plus codeine 30 mg in single-tablet and effervescent formulation to ibuprofen 400 mg, and placebo in the management of moderate to severe postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty healthy outpatients aged 15-29 years undergoing surgical removal of 1 bony impacted mandibular third molar were enrolled in this, single-center, prospective, randomized, triple-blind parallel-group, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Study participants were randomly assigned to three treatment arms. According to the concealed allocation, each patient 30 minutes before surgery received paracetamol 500 mg plus codeine 30 mg (group APAP/COD), ibuprofen 400 mg (group IBU) or placebo (group PLA). Rescue therapy allowed in the postoperative period was paracetamol 500 mg plus codeine 30 mg in groups APAP/COD and PLA and ibuprofen 400 mg in group IBU. Patients recorded on Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) the pain intensity, total number of postoperative-supplement medications and time of the first intake, until 12-hours after surgery and over extra 2 days, RESULTS: Over postoperative 3 days, patients in the APAP/COD group (2.33 ± 1.99) displayed significantly (P< .001) less pain intensity than IBU (3.43 ± 2.47) and placebo (3.57 ± 2.62) groups. The first-day postoperative pain was significantly (P < .001) higher in group PLA than in groups APAP/COD and IBU, but not between the latter 2 groups. However, at 2 hours postdose, the IBU group displayed average pain intensity lower than APAP/COD group (P> .05). On the next 2 days, pain intensity was significantly (P< .001) lower in group APAP/COD than in groups IBU and PLA but failed to reach statistical significance between groups IBU and PLA. Although the time to the first using rescue therapy was longer (445.88 ± 159.96 minute) in group IBU, compared to groups APAP/COD (392.67 ± 138.90 minutes) and PLA (323.00 ± 143.95 minutes), the number of supplemented tablets was significantly higher in group IBU (2.89 ± 2.13) than in groups APAP/COD (1.24 ± 1.79) (P= .001) and PLA (1.53 ± 1.67) (P = .008). No adverse events were registered for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of the present study, over postoperative 3 days, a statistically significant intensity pain reduction and decreased rescue therapy consumption were recorded in the paracetamol-codeine group than to ibuprofen group. Nevertheless, lower pain intensity at 2 hours postdose and longer time using rescue therapy was found in the ibuprofen group without statistical significance. No adverse events occurred over the studied period.

From the pharmaceutical to the clinical: the case for effervescent paracetamol in pain management. A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

Paracetamol has an established place in the management of mild-to-moderate pain, but has certain limitations, including varying bioavailability, and potential hepatotoxicity if taken in overdose. Effervescent formulations may help to overcome these limitations.

METHODS

Pubmed searches, with no limits on date or language, were conducted in February 2020. Further references were identified from the reference lists of retrieved articles, and from the authors' knowledge of the field.

RESULTS

Effervescent formulations contain an organic acid (usually citric acid) and carbonate or bicarbonate salts (usually sodium bicarbonate). Upon contact with water, these react to form carbon dioxide, which facilitates the disintegration of the tablet and dissolution of the active drug. Moreover, sodium bicarbonate dose-dependently increases gastric emptying, which together with rapid dissolution facilitates drug absorption. In pharmacokinetic studies, effervescent formulations result in faster absorption of paracetamol than conventional oral formulations, and this translates into a faster onset of analgesia in clinical trials. Effervescent paracetamol has a favorable safety profile, with good tolerability. Importantly, the sodium content of some preparations does not appear to increase cardiovascular risk under real world conditions. Effervescent formulations may also offer advantages in terms of ease of administration and palatability.

CONCLUSIONS

Effervescent formulations of paracetamol result in faster drug absorption, and hence more rapid analgesia, than oral tablets, and offer a favorable tolerability and safety profile. The use of such formulations may therefore help to promote appropriate use of paracetamol.

A reliable LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine, acetaminophen glutathione and acetaminophen glucuronide in mouse plasma, liver and kidney: Method validation and application to a pharmacokinetic study

A rapid, specific, and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method has been developed and validated to simultaneously quantify N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI), acetaminophen-glutathione (acetaminophen-glut) and acetaminophen-glucuronide (acetaminophen-gluc) in mouse plasma, liver and kidney homogenates. Analytes were eluted by a binary gradient mobile phase composed of water (phase A) and methanol containing 0.1% formic acid (phase B) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min, which was performed on a CAPCELL PAK C₁₈ MG II column. It took 3.2 min to detect three analytes in a single run. Quantification was carried out in positive mode combined with multiple reaction monitoring. The validation of the LC-MS/MS method consisted of specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, protein precipitation recovery, matrix effect, dilution integrity and stability. The plasma and tissue homogenate calibration curves were linear over concentration ranges of 0.050-5.00, 0.050-5.00 and 0.100-40.0 μg/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 0.050, 0.050, and 0.100 μg/mL for NAPQI, acetaminophen-glut and acetaminophen-gluc, respectively. The intra- and inter-run precision values were within 12.47% for NAPQI, 12.11% for acetaminophen-glut and 11.86% for acetaminophen-gluc at their lower limit of quantitation levels. The samples were stable under all tested conditions. This method was successfully applied to study the pharmacokinetics of NAPQI, acetaminophen-glut and acetaminophen-gluc in ICR mice following oral administration of 200 mg/kg of acetaminophen suspension.

Efficacy and speed of onset of pain relief of fast-dissolving paracetamol on postsurgical dental pain: two randomized, single-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol (APAP), also known as acetaminophen, is the most commonly used over-the-counter analgesic for the treatment of mild-to-moderate pain. However, the speed of onset of pain relief is limited mainly to the standard, immediate-release formulation. Efficacy and speed of onset of pain relief are critical in acute pain situations such as postsurgical dental pain, because reducing pain can improve clinical outcome and reduce the risk of transition from acute pain to more chronic pain. Efficacy and rapid onset also reduce the risk of excessive dosing with the analgesic.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the dose-response efficacy and speed of onset of pain relief of a fast-dissolving APAP formulation compared with lower doses of APAP and placebo in dental patients after impacted third molar extraction.

METHODS

Two single-center, single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group studies (Study I and Study II) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and speed of onset of pain relief of different doses of a fast-dissolving APAP tablet (FD-APAP), standard APAP, and placebo in patients with postsurgical dental pain following third molar extraction. In Study I, a single dose of FD-APAP 1000 mg, FD-APAP 500 mg, or placebo was given to 300 patients; in Study II, a single dose of FD-APAP 1000 mg, standard APAP 650 mg, or placebo was given to 401 patients. All 701 patients from both studies were included in the analysis and safety assessment.

RESULTS

FD-APAP 1000 mg demonstrated significantly greater effect compared with FD-APAP 500 mg, APAP 650 mg, and placebo for all efficacy measurements, including sum of pain relief and pain intensity difference, total pain relief, sum of pain intensity difference, pain intensity difference, and pain relief score during 6 hours after the dose. Onset of confirmed first perceptible relief in subjects treated with FD-APAP 1000 mg was 15 minutes, which was 32% and 25% significantly shorter than onset of pain relief of FD-APAP 500 mg (22 minutes) and standard APAP 650 mg (20 minutes), respectively. FD-APAP 500 mg and APAP 650 mg demonstrated efficacy over placebo for most of the measurements; however, their effects were significantly lower and lasted for a shorter period of time than for FD-APAP 1000 mg. All study treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

FD-APAP 1000 mg tablets demonstrated efficacy over placebo. Also, FD-APAP 1000 mg had significantly superior effect, faster onset, and longer duration of pain relief compared with FD-APAP 500 mg and APAP 650 mg tablets.