An analysis of which anti-osteoporosis therapeutic regimen would improve compliance in a population of elderly adults

Systematic scoping review of patients' perceived needs of health services for osteoporosis

Health service planners, administrators and providers need to understand the patients' perspective of health services related to osteoporosis to optimise health outcomes. The aims of this study were to systematically identify and review the literature regarding patients' perceived health service needs relating to osteoporosis and osteopenia. A systematic scoping review was performed of publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO (1990-2016). Descriptive data regarding study design and methodology were extracted and risk of bias assessed. Aggregates of patients' perceived needs of osteoporosis health services were categorised. Thirty-three studies (19 quantitative and 14 qualitative) from 1027 were relevant. The following areas of perceived need emerged: (1) patients sought healthcare from doctors to obtain information and initiate management. They were dissatisfied with poor communication, lack of time and poor continuity of care. (2) Patients perceived a role for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy but were concerned about medication administration and adverse effects. (3) Patients believed that exercise and vitamin supplementation were important, but there is a lack of data examining the needs for other non-pharmacological measures such as smoking cessation and alcohol. (4) Patients wanted diagnostic evaluation and ongoing surveillance of their bone health. This review identified patients' needs for better communication with their healthcare providers. It also showed that a number of important cornerstones of therapy for osteoporosis, such as pharmacotherapy and exercise, are identified as important by patients, as well as ongoing surveillance of bone health. Understanding patients' perceived needs and aligning them with responsive and evidence-informed service models are likely to optimise patient outcomes.

Overcoming problems with adherence to osteoporosis medication

Nonadherence to pharmacological treatment in osteoporosis is a well-recognized problem. As in other chronic diseases, adherence to osteoporosis treatment is poor, resulting in enormous burden on patients and healthcare resources. Most importantly, low adherence rates consistently result in increased rates of fractures. However, it seems that efforts to evaluate and improve rates of both compliance and persistence are increasing. The extension of dosing intervals may be an element, among others, allowing improvements in therapeutic adherence. Improved patient education, enhancing healthcare provider-patients interaction, taking into account patient's preferences and involving them in treatment decisions may improve adherence.

Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009

The purposes of the study were to review available published literature on magnitude of non-adherence with osteoporosis regimens and to determine the association between frequency and modality of medication administration with patient preference and adherence. We searched peer-reviewed journal databases--MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis and Derwent Drug File for publications (January 1979 to January 2009) including MeSH terms--"patient preference", "adherence" and "compliance" based on "dosing frequency" and "modality". Since adherence was difficult to accurately quantify, preference, compliance and persistence were evaluated. Patients' preference and adherence at 12 months were higher with weekly over daily bisphosphonates (≥ 84% preference for weekly, medication possession ratios (MPR) 60-76% vs 46-64%; persistence 43.6-69.7% vs 31.7-55.7%). MPR reported for oral bisphosphonates were 68-71% at 12 months. At 2 years, only 43% of patients had MPR ≥ 80% for daily and weekly bisphosphonates. Observational studies (6-12 months) reported discontinuation rates of 18-22% for daily and 7% for weekly bisphosphonates. Data on monthly bisphosphonates are conflicting and confounded by cost differences, patient support programmes and definition of persistence. Studies suggest patient preference for annual zoledronic acid infusions over weekly bisphosphonates (66.4-78.8% vs 9.0-19.7%, respectively), but no data on compliance or persistence are available. Drug effectiveness, side effects and route of administration were more important than frequency. Although less frequent dosing is preferred, other factors such as perceived efficacy, side effects, medication cost, availability of patient support programmes and route of delivery are equally important. Adherence is complex and difficult to quantify and may not be exclusively influenced by frequency of medication administration.

Strontium ranelate: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

This is a review of the pharmacology of strontium ranelate (Protelos, Protos, Protaxos, Bivalos, Osseor), and its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Strontium ranelate is a divalent strontium salt of ranelic acid that is capable of increasing bone formation and reducing bone resorption, thereby uncoupling and rebalancing bone turnover in favour of bone formation. The drug is effective in reducing the risk of fractures, including both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, according to data from two large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trials of 5 years' duration, and reduced the risk of hip fracture in high-risk patients in a post hoc analysis of one trial. Moreover, data from patients who continued to receive the drug during the 3-year extension phases of these trials indicate that strontium ranelate continues to provide protection against new vertebral fractures and nonvertebral fractures for up to 8 years of therapy. It also improves bone mineral density at numerous sites and both increases markers of bone formation and decreases markers of bone resorption. Strontium ranelate is administered orally as a suspension and is generally well tolerated. The nature of adverse events was generally similar regardless of treatment duration in clinical trials, with the most commonly reported being nausea and diarrhoea over 5 years of treatment, and memory loss and diarrhoea during longer-term treatment. Although an increased risk of venous thromboembolism was associated with strontium ranelate relative to placebo over 5 years of treatment in a pooled analysis of clinical trials, postmarketing data have not confirmed this finding. Overall, the clinical data available suggest that strontium ranelate is an effective and generally well tolerated option for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.