Appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist combination therapy among asthma patients in a US commercially insured population

Prevalence of Recurrent Hospital Admission in Children with Recurrent Wheezing in Babylon Province

BACKGROUND: Occurring of recurrent wheezing attacks signify a significant healthcare problem and considered one of the most common causes of emergency unit admission and hospitalizations. AIM: The aim of study is to determine the associations of recurrent hospital admissions in children with recurrent wheezing. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study of 102 children with recurrent wheezy chest. Data collected from admitted patients with recurrent wheezing by direct interview with the patients’ families. Patients were 6 months to 5 years old. Data collected including age, gender, place of living whether urban or rural, prematurity, no. of people at home, history of NCU admission, history of ICU admission, exclusive breast feeding for 1st 6 months, anemia, GERD, history of atopy, exposure to smoking, inhaler use, and CXR findings. RESULTS: About 79.41% of children have 1-3 times admission in hospital, significant association between the no. of hospitalization and History of ICU admission, children with more than 3 times admission to hospital present with GERD with significant association. Significant association with more than 3 times admission to hospital have previous history of exposure to smoking, inhaler use and X-ray finding. CONCLUSION: One to three years old children is the most common age they have recurrent wheezing, most children with recurrent wheezy chest have more than 3 times hospitalization, most babies have previous history of ICU admission, GERD and exposure to smoking.

Therapeutic Approaches in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common types of muscular dystrophy, affecting roughly one in 8000 individuals. The complex underlying genetics and poor mechanistic understanding has caused a bottleneck in therapeutic development. Until the discovery of DUX4 and its causal role in FSHD, most trials were untargeted with limited results. Emerging approaches can learn from these early trials to increase their chance of success. Here, we explore the evolution of FSHD clinical trials from nonspecific anabolic or anti-inflammatory/oxidant strategies to cutting-edge molecular therapies targeting DUX4, and we discuss the importance of clinical outcome measures. With combined advances across multiple facets of FSHD research, the field is now poised to accelerate the process of therapeutic discovery and testing.

Budesonide/formoterol therapy: effective and appropriate use in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Aim: Quality, real-world comparative effectiveness (CE) studies of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy efficacy are scarce. We identified and evaluated peer-reviewed CE and appropriate-use evaluations of budesonide/formoterol combination (BFC) maintenance therapy. Materials & methods: Analyses were limited to retrospective, real-world utilization studies of BFC delivered by pressurized metered-dose inhalers. Results: In a CE study of BFC versus fluticasone/salmeterol combinations (FSC) in asthma, BFC users had fewer total exacerbations. In appropriate-use studies of asthma treatment, BFC patients were consistently more likely to meet treatment escalation recommendations. BFC comparisons with FSC or tiotropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease found differences in exacerbation rates and rescue inhaler use. Conclusion: We found available, good quality BFC CE and appropriate-use articles; however, all had limitations.

The US Food and Drug Administration's drug safety recommendations and long-acting beta2-agonist dispensing pattern changes in adult asthma patients: 2003-2012

Background

Emerging safety issues associated with long-acting beta₂-agonist (LABA) have led to multiple regulatory activities by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2003, including Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) in 2010. These DSCs had three specific recommendations for the safe use of LABA products in adult asthma treatment.

Methods

We examined the initiation of LABA-containing products for adult asthma treatment using an intermittent time series approach in a claims database from 2003 to 2012. We assessed the alignment of dispensing patterns with the following 2010 FDA recommendations: 1) contraindicated use of single-ingredient (SI)-LABA without an asthma controller medication (ACM); 2) a LABA should only be used when asthma is not adequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or ACM; and 3) step-down asthma therapy (e.g., discontinue LABA) when asthma control is achieved.

Results

There were 477,922 adults (18–64 years old) dispensed a new LABA during 2003–2012. Among LABA initiators, patients who initiated an SI-LABA and who did “not” have an ACM dispensed on the same date decreased from >9% in 2003 (the initial labeling change) to <2% post 2010 DSCs (p-value <0.0001 in the segmented regression model). The proportion of asthma patients dispensed an ICS in 6 months prior to initiating LABA treatment did not increase. The proportion of patients with longer than 4 months of continuous treatment did not decrease over the study period.

Conclusion

Although the decrease in SI-LABA initiation is consistent with FDA’s recommendations, low ICS dispensing before initiating a LABA and LABA continuation practices require further efforts to move toward the recommended safe practices.

Management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with combination inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists: a review of comparative effectiveness research

The value of combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists (ICS/LABA) is well recognized in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite differences in the pharmacological properties between two well-established ICS/LABA products (budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone/salmeterol), data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses suggest that these two products perform similarly under RCT conditions. In contrast, a few recently reported real-world comparative effectiveness studies have suggested that there are substantial differences between ICS/LABA combination treatments in terms of clinical and healthcare outcomes in patients with asthma or COPD. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of the benefits, as well as the limitations, of comparative effectiveness research (CER) in the therapeutic area of asthma and COPD. We conducted a structured literature review of the current CER studies on ICS/LABA combinations in asthma and COPD. These articles were then used to illustrate the unique challenges of CER studies, providing a summary of study results and limitations. We focus particularly on difficult biases and confounding factors that may be introduced before, during, and after the initiation of therapy. Beyond being a review of these two ICS/LABA combination treatments, this article is intended to help those who wish to assess the quality of CER published projects in asthma and COPD, or guide investigators who wish to design new CER studies for chronic respiratory disease treatments.

Changes in long-acting β-agonist utilization after the FDA's 2010 drug safety communication

PURPOSE

In February 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued new recommendations for the safe use of long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the FDA's 2010 safety advisory on LABA utilization.

METHODS

Using administrative data from the Oregon Medicaid program, we performed an interrupted time series regression to evaluate changes in the trend in new LABA prescriptions before and after the FDA's 2010 advisory. Trends in incident fills were examined among those with and without an asthma diagnosis code and previous respiratory controller medication use; trends were also assessed according to patient age.

FINDINGS

The average age of the 8646 study patients was 37 years, 53% had a diagnosis of asthma, 21% had no respiratory diagnosis, and 32% had not used a respiratory controller medication in the recent past. The trend in new LABA prescriptions declined by 0.09 new start per 10,000 patients per month (95% CI, -0.19 to -0.01) after the FDA's advisory. Among those with a diagnosis of asthma, there was an immediate drop of 0.48 (95% CI, -0.93 to -0.03) and a 0.10 (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.06) decline in the monthly rate of new starts per 10,000 patients. Immediately after the FDA's advisory, we observed a statistically significant 4.7% increase (95% CI, 0.8 to 8.7) in the proportion of new LABA starts with history of previous respiratory controller medication use. Utilization of LABAs did not change in those without a diagnosis of asthma.

IMPLICATIONS

The FDA's 2010 advisory was associated with modest reductions in LABA utilization overall and in ways highlighted in their recommendations.

Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist in pediatric and adolescent asthma patients, 2003-2011

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate changes in the dispensing patterns of long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) in pediatric and adolescent asthma patients in relation to multiple Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory activities from 2003 to 2011.

METHODS

We estimated LABA dispensing to pediatric asthma patients across three periods: 2003-2004 (after the first labeling change), 2005-2009 (after regulatory activities in 2005 and before 2010 LABA labeling change) and 2010-2011 (after 2010 LABA labeling change), using the IMS Health Plan Claims database. We estimated dispensing patterns over time for single-ingredient (SI) LABA and fixed-dose combination (FDC) of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and LABA (FDC-ICS/LABA). We also evaluated prior use of non-LABA asthma-control medication (ACM) before LABA initiation.

RESULTS

Of the 147 862 pediatric and adolescent asthma patients who initiated a LABA during the entire study period, the majority (96%) were FDC-ICS/LABA initiators. The proportion of SI-LABA among any LABA initiators was small and declined (9%, 4% and 2%, trend test p < 0.001) for the three periods. Among the patients who initiated, the proportions with prior use of an ACM (1-90 days prior) were 35%, 36% and 39% for the three periods.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant decline in the proportion of SI-LABA initiation over these years is consistent with FDA's recommendations. However, the favorable trend cannot be solely attributed to FDA activities as changes to clinical practice guidelines, and media publicity may have played a role. Investigating the reasons for the low ACM use before LABA initiation may inform approaches to further improve appropriate use of LABA in young asthma patients.

Real-time asthma outreach reduces excessive short-acting β2-agonist use: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Excessive use of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) indicates impaired asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether real-time outreach to excessive SABA users reduces SABA canister dispensings.

METHODS

After real-time determination of a seventh SABA canister dispensing in the prior 12 months by using informational pharmacy technology, 12 to 56 year old patients with physician-coded asthma and inhaled corticosteroid dispensing were block randomized by prior asthma specialist care and medication step-care level into intervention (n = 1001) and control groups (n = 998). Intervention included real-time letter notification to patients and an electronic message to their physician with management suggestions, including facilitated allergy referral for patients without prior asthma specialist care. The control group received this organization's standard asthma care management without research contact. Frequency of the seventh SABA canister dispensing in the follow-up year was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, intervention patients reached 7 SABA canister dispensings less frequently (50.7% vs 57.1%; risk ratio 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.97]; P = .007) and later (hazard ratio 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71-0.91; P < .001). SABA canister dispensings (mean ± SD) were less in intervention (7.5 ± 4.9 canisters) than controls (8.6 ± 5.3 canisters) (rate ratio 0.87 [95% CI, 0.82-0.93]; P < .001). The intervention reduced the risk of ≥7 SABA canister dispensings in patients without specialist care compared with patients with specialist care in the prior 3 years (P < .001) (P = .04 for interaction by prior specialist care). Visits to allergists were more frequent for intervention patients (30.9%) than for control patients (16.8%) (risk ratio 1.83 [95% CI, 1.54-2.16]; P < .001). Asthma exacerbations were unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel administrative-based asthma outreach program improves markers of asthma impairment in patients without prior asthma specialist care and is adaptable to managed care organizations with electronic medical records.

An evaluation of asthma medication utilization for risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) in the United States: 2005-2011

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess drug utilization patterns of fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) combination (FSC) and SAL over the 7-year period of 2005-2011 in patients with asthma as part of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS).

METHODS

A descriptive, retrospective observational study utilizing national pharmacy data and employer-based claims data to characterize drug utilization patterns.

RESULTS

For patients with asthma, the total number of FSC and SAL dispensings and users of FSC and SAL has declined between 2005 and 2011. During this period, FSC and SAL dispensing for asthma decreased 24% and 76%, respectively, with a more pronounced decline between 2010 and 2011 relative to other years. The total number of patients with asthma who were dispensed FSC has decreased by 10% among adults and by 40% in children and adolescents. While SAL-containing medications decreased, dispensing of FP monotherapy increased 39% during the same 7-year period. The number of patients dispensed FP for asthma has increased 47% in children 4-11 years of age, 72% in adolescents 12-17 years of age, and 6% in adults. SAL use without a controller was infrequent and decreasing, reported by 1.7% and 0.5% of patients with asthma in 2005 and 2011, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with asthma, use of FSC and SAL decreased between 2005 and 2011, while the use of FP increased. Use of SAL monotherapy was infrequent and declined during the study period. The data suggest that the substantial communication activities have encouraged appropriate prescribing of long-acting β2-adrenergic agonist (LABA).

Characterization of long-acting beta₂-adrenergic agonists utilization in asthma patients

OBJECTIVE

Because of the serious safety risks, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended that long-acting beta₂-adrenergic agonists (LABAs) be reserved for patients whose asthma cannot be adequately managed with asthma control medication. The objective of the study is to assess prescribing patterns for LABAs prior to the FDA's drug safety communication issued on 2 June 2010.

METHODS

Data were extracted from IMS Health Plan Claims database for asthma patients who had a new LABA therapy during 2005-2009. The proportion of LABA incident episodes preceded by inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) was examined. The medication-concurrent ratio (MCR), defined as the ratio of overlapping therapy days of single-ingredient (SI) LABAs and non-LABA products to the total days of SI LABAs, was calculated. Four criteria were used to estimate poorly controlled asthma prior to LABA initiation.

RESULTS

Of the 228 047 asthma patients, fixed-dose combination (FDC) LABAs were used by the majority of patients (96%). Prior use of ICS or LTRAs was observed in 64% and 31% of SI and FDC LABA incident episodes, respectively. The median MCR for SI LABAs was 62%. Approximately half of the patients met at least one criterion for poorly controlled asthma prior to LABA use.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial proportion of patients was prescribed LABAs without prior use of ICS or LTRAs, or other indicators of poor asthma control. These findings suggest that asthma guidelines were not entirely followed in clinical practice during the study period.

Pragmatic research and outcomes in asthma and COPD

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common diseases which cause patients and society considerable difficulties. These are costly diseases which cause substantial morbidity and death. Health care policy makers have made improving outcomes in asthma and COPD a priority. Application of guideline recommended approaches to asthma and COPD care in the real-life setting has been emphasized but outcomes have not improved. Failure to improve outcomes may not be because of inconsistent applications of guideline recommendations, but rather because there are difficulties implementing the Expert Panel Report III (EPR 3) method for categorizing asthma severity and the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) method for diagnosing COPD. As these serve as the foundation for treatment recommendations for these diseases, alternative approaches should be considered for categorizing asthma severity and identifying COPD patients. Claims-based algorithms provide an intriguing option for identifying persistent asthma patients and symptomatic COPD patients in administrative databases. These methods could be used as the basis for pragmatic research, both retrospective and prospective, on assessing outcomes of guideline recommended treatment approaches in asthma and COPD. Important questions urgently need to be answered about how guideline recommended approaches regarding use of long-acting inhaled β-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid (LABA/ICS) in asthma and long-acting inhaled anti-muscarinic agent (LAMA) and LABA/ICS in COPD affect outcomes in real-life situations.

FDA's recommendations on the use of long-acting {beta}2 agonists in the management of asthma

The revised labeling for long-acting β(2) agonists (LABAs) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is controversial and in part is inconsistent with the 2007 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program asthma guidelines. Two large randomized controlled studies, the Serevent Nationwide Surveillance (SNS) study and the Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial (SMART), and a 2008 meta-analysis conducted by the FDA were the main sources of information used to determine the label changes. A paucity of large, well-designed, controlled, prospective studies evaluating the asthma-related risks associated with LABAs makes it difficult to reach a consensus regarding how best to use LABAs in patients with asthma.

Association between previous health care use and initiation of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist combination therapy among US patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Combination inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy is recommended for patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled by other maintenance therapies and for those with moderate to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the appropriateness of initiation of ICS/LABA combination therapy based on health care use criteria and the proportions of US patients filling prescriptions for either of 2 available therapies.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from commercially insured asthma patients aged 12 to 64 years who initiated combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) or budesonide/ formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BFC) from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2008. Continuously enrolled patients who had not received ICS/LABA therapy during a 12-month preindex period were assigned to the BFC or FSC cohort based on their initial ICS/LABA prescription (index date). Appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA combination therapy was determined based on the risks for asthma exacerbation, high impairment, and previous controller medication use. Specifically, initiation of ICS/LABA therapy was considered appropriate if patients had claims during the preindex period for an ICS or leukotriene receptor antagonist, an asthma-related emergency department visit or hospitalization, >or=2 courses of oral corticosteroid, or >or=6 canisters of a rescue short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (SABA). Factors associated with appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA therapy were assessed by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 16,205 patients initiated on ICS/LABA therapy, 39.2% met >or=1 criterion for appropriate use-788 of 1417 patients (55.6%) in the BFC group and 5572 of 14,788 patients (37.7%) in the FSC group (P < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of BFC than FSC users met the individual criteria for previous controller medication use (45.7% vs 26.1%, respectively) and high SABA use (9.7% vs 6.1%). BFC users had a significantly higher likelihood of meeting >or=1 appropriateness criterion compared with FSC users (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.60-2.00; P < 0.001). Also significantly associated with appropriate use were receipt of the initial ICS/LABA prescription from a pulmonologist or allergist rather than from a physician in family medicine/general practice (P < 0.001), residence in the West relative to the Northeast (P < 0.005), and presence of specific comorbidities (allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and acute respiratory infection; all, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Just under 40% of patients met the criteria for appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA therapy, with significantly greater proportions of BFC than FSC users meeting the overall and individual criteria for appropriate use. Patients with appropriate initiation of ICS/LABA therapy were significantly more likely to be treated by pulmonologists and allergists than by family medicine/general practitioners.