Are we failing to document adequate smoking histories? A brief review 1999-2009

The MyLungHealth study protocol: a pragmatic patient-randomised controlled trial to evaluate a patient-centred, electronic health record-integrated intervention to enhance lung cancer screening in primary care

INTRODUCTION

Early lung cancer screening (LCS) through low-dose CT (LDCT) is crucial but underused due to various barriers, including incomplete or inaccurate patient smoking data in the electronic health record and limited time for shared decision-making. The objective of this trial is to investigate a patient-centred intervention, MyLungHealth, delivered through the patient portal. The intervention is designed to improve LCS rates through increased identification of eligible patients and informed decision-making.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MyLungHealth is a multisite pragmatic trial, involving University of Utah Health and New York University Langone Health primary care clinics. The MyLungHealth intervention was developed using a user-centred design process, informed by patient and provider focus groups and interviews. The intervention's effectiveness will be evaluated through a patient-randomised trial, comparing the combined use of MyLungHealth and DecisionPrecision+ (a provider-focused shared decision-making intervention) against DecisionPrecision+ alone. The first study hypothesis is that among patients aged 50-79 with uncertain LCS eligibility (eg, 10-19 pack-years or unknown pack-years or unknown quit date for individuals who used to smoke), MyLungHealth eligibility questionnaires will result in increased identification of LCS-eligible patients (n~26 729 patients). The second study hypothesis is that among patients aged 50-79 with documented LCS eligibility (20+ pack-years, quit within the last 15 years if individuals who used to smoke, and no recent screening or screening discussion), MyLungHealth education will result in increased LDCT ordering (n~4574 patients). Primary outcomes will be identification of LCS-eligible patients among individuals with uncertain LCS eligibility and LDCT ordering rates among individuals with documented LCS eligibility.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (# 00153806). The patient data collected for this study will not be shared publicly due to the sensitive nature of the patient health information and the fact that we will not be obtaining written informed consent to allow public sharing of their data. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06338592.

Documentation of smoking in scheduled asthma contacts in primary health care: a 12-year follow-up study

Smoking among asthmatics is common and associates with poorer asthma control, more rapid lung function decline and higher health care costs in dose-dependent manner. No previous real-life studies exist, however, on how smoking status and pack-years are documented in scheduled asthma contacts in primary health care (PHC) during long-term follow-up, and how often patients are advised to quit smoking. In this real-life 12-year follow-up study, we showed that out of all scheduled PHC asthma contacts (n = 603) smoking was mentioned only in 17.2% and pack-years only in 6.5%. Smoking data was not recorded even once in 70.9% of never smokers, 64.7% of ex-smokers and 27.3% of current smokers. Smoking including pack-years were mentioned more often if nurse took part on the scheduled contact. For current smokers, smoking cessation was recommended only in 21.7% of their scheduled contacts. Current smokers used more antibiotics and had more unscheduled health care contacts during follow-up.

OUP accepted manuscript

Objective

Materials and Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

A combination of intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity, estrogen receptor alpha and human papillomavirus status predicts outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Previous work indicates that mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH), estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) expression, and human papillomavirus (HPV) status provide prognostic utility in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We sought to assess whether the combination of these three objective biomarkers could provide better prognostication for patients who receive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

156 patients (75 oral cavity, 44 oropharyngeal and 37 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cancer patients) who received CRT as primary therapy or adjuvant to surgery were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). MATH values were calculated from TCGA whole exome sequencing data, HPV status was determined by mapping RNA-seq reads, and ERα expression was determined from ESR1 mRNA expression data. Relationships among clinical characteristics were assessed by Fisher exact tests. Relationships of clinical characteristics and MATH, ERα and HPV to overall survival were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

The combination of poor-prognosis values for all 3 biomarkers (high MATH, low ERα and HPV-negative status) has a predicted hazard ratio of 28.2 (95% CI: 5.4-148, p = 0.0001) versus the combination of their good-prognosis values (low MATH, high ERα and HPV-positive status). Addition of N classification to the combination of these three biomarkers added further prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of these three biomarkers, readily determined on pretreatment biopsy specimens, can stratify patients into prognostic groups. Their application potentially offers numerous opportunities to optimize treatment or explore de-intensification strategies in the clinical trial setting.

Assessing Different Approaches to Leveraging Historical Smoking Exposure Data to Better Select Lung Cancer Screening Candidates: A Retrospective Validation Study

INTRODUCTION

There is mounting interest in the use of risk prediction models to guide lung cancer screening. Electronic health records (EHRs) could facilitate such an approach, but smoking exposure documentation is notoriously inaccurate. While the negative impact of inaccurate EHR data on screening practices reliant on dichotomized age and smoking exposure-based criteria has been demonstrated, less is known regarding its impact on the performance of model-based screening.

AIMS AND METHODS

Data were collected from a cohort of 37 422 ever-smokers between the ages of 55 and 74, seen at an academic safety-net healthcare system between 1999 and 2018. The National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) criteria, PLCOM2012 and LCRAT lung cancer risk prediction models were validated against time to lung cancer diagnosis. Discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve [AUC]) and calibration were assessed. The effect of substituting the last documented smoking variables with differentially retrieved "history conscious" measures was also determined.

RESULTS

The PLCOM2012 and LCRAT models had AUCs of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.73) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.74), respectively. Compared with the NLST criteria, PLCOM2012 had a significantly greater time-dependent sensitivity (69.9% vs. 64.5%, p < .01) and specificity (58.3% vs. 56.4%, p < .001). Unlike the NLST criteria, the performances of the PLCOM2012 and LCRAT models were not prone to historical variability in smoking exposure documentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the inaccuracies of EHR-documented smoking histories, leveraging model-based lung cancer risk estimation may be a reasonable strategy for screening, and is of greater value compared with using NLST criteria in the same setting.

IMPLICATIONS

EHRs are potentially well suited to aid in the risk-based selection of lung cancer screening candidates, but healthcare providers and systems may elect not to leverage EHR data due to prior work that has shown limitations in structured smoking exposure data quality. Our findings suggest that despite potential inaccuracies in the underlying EHR data, screening approaches that use multivariable models may perform significantly better than approaches that rely on simpler age and exposure-based criteria. These results should encourage providers to consider using pre-existing smoking exposure data with a model-based approach to guide lung cancer screening practices.

Reliability of self-reported smoking history and its implications for lung cancer screening

Clinical guidelines endorse either a 30 or 20 pack-year smoking history threshold when determining eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). However, self-reported smoking history is subject to recall bias that can affect patient eligibility. We examined the reliability of smokers’ self-reported tobacco use and its impact on eligibility for LCS. Current or former smokers aged 55–77 years completed questionnaires requesting demographic information and smoking history. Data were collected between December 2014 and September 2015. Total pack-year smoking history was calculated for each participant based on their responses at baseline and one month later. One hundred and two participants completed the study (mean age = 63.6 years). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the pack-year estimate was 0.93. For the 30 pack-year threshold, eight (7.8%) participants were eligible at one but not both assessment periods. For the 20 pack-year threshold, twelve participants (11.8%) were eligible at one but not both assessment periods. Inconsistent reporting was higher among current compared to former smokers. Smokers’ self-reported tobacco use appears highly reliable over short time periods. Nevertheless, there is some inconsistent reporting. We recommend that clinicians carefully assess smoking history, probe patients’ recall of duration and quantity of smoking, and collect tobacco use information at every encounter.

Effect of comprehensive smoke-free legislation on asthma and coronary disease trends in Spanish primary care patients

Background

To examine the impact of comprehensive smoke-free legislation (SFL) (Law 42/2010) on the incidence and prevalence of adult asthma and coronary disease in primary health care (PHC) patients from three Spanish regions, overall and stratified by sex.

Methods

Longitudinal observational study conducted between 2007 and 2013 in the population over 15 years of age assigned to 66 PHC teams in Catalonia, Navarre and the Balearic Islands. Crude rates and age-standardized (truncated: asthma ≥ 16 years and coronary disease ≥ 35 years) incidence and prevalence rates using the direct method based on the European Standard Population were estimated based on data from PHC electronic health records. Joinpoint analysis was used to analyse the trends of age-standardized incidence and prevalence rates. Trends were expressed as annual percentage change and average annual percent change (AAPC).

Results

The standardized asthma incidence rate showed a non-significant downward trend and the standardized prevalence rates rose significantly in the three regions. Standardized coronary disease incidence and prevalence rates were considerably higher for men than for women in all regions. The standardized coronary disease incidence rates in Catalonia (AAPC: -8.00%, 95% CI: -10.46; -5.47) and Navarre (AAPC: -3.66%, 95% CI: -4.95;-2.35) showed a significant downward trend from 2007 to 2013, overall and by sex. The standardized coronary disease prevalence trend rate increased significantly in the whole period in Catalonia and the Balearic Islands, although a non-significant downward trend was observed from 2010 in Catalonia.

Conclusion

No changes in the trends of adult asthma and coronary disease in PHC Spanish patients were detected after the introduction of comprehensive SFL.

Head and Neck Cancer in World Trade Center Responders: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report on cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) among World Trade Center (WTC) responders participating in the WTC Health Program and seen at Rutgers WTC Center of Clinical Excellence.

METHODS

Medical records were abstracted by two clinical reviewers and discrepancies resolved. Cases were defined as WTC responders diagnosed with HNC between December 9, 2005, and December 31, 2016.

RESULTS

Sixteen HNC patients met the case definition, most (13) arrived at the WTC location on 9/11 or within the following 2 days, and half worked in law enforcement during the 9/1 response.

CONCLUSION

An association between HNC and WTC exposure is biologically plausible and should be further investigated. Research to enumerate the risk factor profile for these cancers may contribute to understanding mechanisms by which WTC exposure can contribute to carcinogenesis and to prevention and early detection strategies.

[Application of the Smoking Scale for Primary Care (ETAP) in clinical practice]

Objetivo

Averiguar si la escala de tabaquismo ETAP, que mide la exposición acumulada al tabaco tanto activa como pasivamente, es aplicable y efectiva en la práctica clínica de la atención primaria para la prevención del infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM).

Emplazamiento Centro de salud de Barranco Grande, en Tenerife.

Diseño

Estudio de 61 casos (IAM) y 144 controles. Muestreo con arranque aleatorio, sin apareamiento. Se realizó análisis de curvas COR-II y se estimó la efectividad mediante sensibilidad y valor predictivo negativo (VPN). Se administró una encuesta a los médicos de familia participantes sobre la aplicabilidad de la ETAP en la consulta.

Resultados

La opinión de los médicos participantes fue unánimemente favorable: la ETAP fue de fácil uso en la consulta, necesitó menos de 3 min por paciente y resultó útil para reforzar la intervención preventiva. La curva COR-II de la ETAP mostró que 20 años de exposición era el mejor punto de corte, con un área bajo la curva de 0,70 (IC 95%: 0,62-0,78) y una combinación de sensibilidad (98%) y VPN (96%) para el IAM. Al estratificar edad y sexo, en todos los grupos se alcanzaron sensibilidades y VPN cercanos al 100%, salvo en los hombres de edad ≥ 55 años, en quienes el VPN cayó hasta el 75%.

Conclusiones

Los resultados apuntan a que ETAP es una herramienta válida que puede ser aplicable y efectiva en la práctica clínica de la atención primaria para la prevención del IAM relacionado con el consumo de tabaco.

Variability in screening prevention activities in primary care in Spain: a multilevel analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence of the benefits of prevention activities, studies have reported only partial integration and great variability of screening in daily clinical practice. The study objectives were: 1) To describe Primary Health Care (PHC) screening for arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, tobacco use, and excessive alcohol consumption in 2008 in 2 regions of Spain, based on electronic health records, and 2) To assess and quantify variability in screening, and identify factors (of patient, general practitioners and PHC team) associated with being screened, that are common throughout the PHC population.

METHODS

Multicentre, cross-sectional study of individuals aged ≥ 16 years (N = 468,940) who visited the 426 general practitioners (GPs) in 44 PHC teams in Catalonia and Navarre in 2008.

OUTCOMES

screening for hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, tobacco use, and excessive alcohol consumption. Other variables were considered at the individual (sociodemographics, visits, health problems), GP and PHC team (region among others). Individual and contextual factors associated with the odds of being screened and the variance attributable to each level were identified using the SAS PROC GLIMMIX macro.

RESULTS

The most prevalent screenings were for dyslipidaemia (64.4%) and hypertension (50.8%); the least prevalent was tobacco use (36.6%). Overall, the odds of being screened were higher for women, older patients, those with more comorbidities, more cardiovascular risk factors, and more frequent office visits, and those assigned to a female GP, a GP with a lower patient load, or a PHC team with a lower percentage of patients older than 65 years. On average, individuals in Navarre were less likely to be screened than those in Catalonia. Hypertension and dyslipidaemia screenings had the least unexplained variability between PHC teams and GPs, respectively, after adjusting for individual and contextual factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the studied screenings, those for obesity, tobacco, and alcohol use were the least prevalent. Attention to screening, especially for tobacco and alcohol, can be greatly improved in the PHC setting.

'SIMPLES': a structured primary care approach to adults with difficult asthma

The substantial majority of patients with asthma can expect minimal breakthrough symptoms on standard doses of inhaled corticosteroids with or without additional add-on therapies. SIMPLES is a structured primary care approach to the review of a person with uncontrolled asthma which encompasses patient education monitoring, lifestyle and pharmacological management and addressing support needs which will achieve control in most patients. The small group of patients presenting with persistent asthma symptoms despite being prescribed high levels of treatment are often referred to as having 'difficult asthma'. Some will have difficult, 'therapy resistant' asthma, some will have psychosocial problems which make it difficult for them to achieve asthma control and some may prove to have an alternative diagnosis driving their symptoms. A few patients will benefit from referral to a 'difficult asthma' clinic. The SIMPLES approach, aligned with close co-operation between primary and specialist care, can identify this patient group, avoid inappropriate escalation of treatment, and streamline clinical assessment and management.