Cost-effectiveness of early compared to late inhaled nitric oxide therapy in near-term infants

Pharmacotherapy for the Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Can Anything Compete with Caffeine and Corticosteroids?

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a morbidity of prematurity with implications for respiratory and neurologic health into adulthood. Multiple risk factors contribute to the development of BPD leading to examination of various prevention strategies. The roles of systemic corticosteroids and caffeine have been addressed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The place in therapy of other agents commonly utilized in clinical practice remains unclear. Inhaled nitric oxide has been the subject of numerous large, randomized controlled trials in preterm infants. Despite sound rationale, these trials have largely failed to document benefit, suggesting a limited role for inhaled nitric oxide therapy in the preterm population. In contrast, intramuscular vitamin A has been documented to reduce the incidence of BPD in randomized trials. However, the invasiveness and the sporadic availability of this therapy have led to decreased utilization. All macrolide antibiotics do not appear to have a similar impact on the incidence of BPD; however, azithromycin administered to infants colonized with Ureaplasma may have impact. Questions remain about the optimal dosing approach and long-term safety of this intervention. Finally, diuretic therapy is widely used in clinical practice despite significant toxicities and limited data supporting a role in BPD prevention. Taken together, available data suggest that caffeine and selective use of corticosteroids remain the mainstays of pharmacologic BPD prevention.

Inhaled nitric oxide for neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in the CINRGI study: time to treatment response

BACKGROUND

Substantial numbers of neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) do not immediately respond to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and are often labeled as non-responders. This retrospective data analysis assessed time to treatment response in the iNO key registration trial.

METHODS

Treatment response was defined as a ≥10% increase in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂) or a ≥10% decrease in oxygenation index (OI) after initiation of study gas without the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The proportion of patients showing a response at 30 min, 1 h, 24 h, and >24 h after iNO or placebo initiation was calculated and stratified by baseline PaO₂ and OI.

RESULTS

Data from 248 patients (iNO: n = 126; placebo: n = 122) were included; 66 patients receiving iNO showed improvement in oxygenation without needing ECMO versus 38 receiving placebo. Of the 66 iNO responders, 73% responded within ≤30 min, 9% within ≤1 h, 12% within ≤24 h, and 6% after 24 h. Of the 38 patients with improvement in oxygenation without needing ECMO while receiving placebo, 53% showed improvement within ≤30 min, 16% within ≤1 h, 29% within ≤24 h, and 3% after 24 h. Baseline disease severity was not predictive of time to response. Of the 48 patients in the iNO treatment group who were classified as non-responders due to eventual need for ECMO and not included in the analysis of responders, 40 (83%) had an initial improvement in oxygenation during iNO therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in PaO₂ and OI after iNO initiation appear to be imprecise biomarkers of response to therapy in neonates with HRF. In some patients treated with iNO, it took up to 24 h to achieve improvement in oxygenation without need for ECMO, and a majority of those who eventually required ECMO did show an initial improvement in oxygenation during iNO treatment. Thus, reliable, objective, early criteria for iNO response still need to be established, and initial PaO₂/OI responses should be interpreted with caution, particularly when considering discontinuing iNO therapy.

Inhaled nitric oxide in term/late preterm neonates with hypoxic respiratory failure: estimating the financial impact of earlier use

OBJECTIVE

We reported recently that early use of inhaled nitric oxide therapy (iNO) for term and late preterm infants with hypoxic respiratory failure (HRF) at an oxygenation index (OI) of ≥15 and <20 is associated with earlier discharge from the hospital, relative to babies treated at OI ≥25. The objective of the present analysis is to determine whether earlier use of iNO in this cohort leads to lower cost of medical care.

METHODS

We used a decision-analytic model, which was developed to compare hospital resource use and costs associated with early versus standard use of iNO in HRF. The model population included infants with moderate HRF caused by primary pulmonary hypertension with an OI ≥15 and <20. A hypothetical case population of 1000 patients was assumed and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were completed where all the clinical inputs into the model were varied. Two deterministic sensitivity analyses were also completed, one surrounding the hospital cost inputs and another surrounding the cost of iNO.

RESULTS

Early iNO was associated with fewer hospital days, fewer days of ventilation and fewer hours on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, total costs per patient were $88,518 ± $7574 and $92,581 ± $9664 for early iNO and standard iNO, respectively. The probability of early iNO being cost-effective was approximately 72%, based on a willingness to pay $100,000 or less to prevent ECMO therapy and/or death. In both deterministic sensitivity analyses, early iNO was cost-saving.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that early use of iNO at an OI of ≥15 and <20 may be associated with shorter hospitalizations and a decreased cost of care for term/late preterm infants with HRF associated with pulmonary hypertension. Our results are based on clinical data from a single trial; future research using data from real-world practice is warranted.