Treatment adherence and persistence with duloxetine, venlafaxine XR, and escitalopram among patients with major depressive disorder and chronic pain-related diseases

Current Opinions about the Use of Duloxetine: Results from a Survey Aimed at Psychiatrists

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex psychiatric disorder that, presented alone or with other comorbidities, requires different adjustments of antidepressant treatments. Some investigations have demonstrated that psychoactive drugs, such as serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), can exert more effective and faster antidepressant effects than other common medications used, such as serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), although these differences are still controversial. During the last five years, the SNRI duloxetine has shown favorable results in clinical practice for the treatment of MDD, anxiety, and fibromyalgia. Through an online self-completed survey, in the present article, we collected information from 163 psychiatrists regarding the use of duloxetine and its comparison with other psychiatric drugs, concerning psychiatrists' knowledge and experience, as well as patients' preferences, symptoms, and well-being. We discussed and contrasted physicians' reports and the scientific literature, finding satisfactory concordances, and finally concluded that there is agreement regarding the use of duloxetine, not only due to its tolerability and effectiveness but also due to the wide variety of situations in which it can be used (e.g., somatic symptoms in fibromyalgia, diabetes) as it relieves neuropathic pain as well.

Evidence of new-onset depression among persons with migraine after discontinuing antidepressants

Antidepressants have been hypothesized to cause tardive dysphoria-the delayed development of negative emotional symptoms. We assessed the risk of tardive dysphoria in a cohort of persons with migraine taking anti-migraine antidepressants with no known diagnosis of any mood or anxiety disorder. We included all outpatient encounters in a university hospital system for migraine from January 2008 through October 2018, excluding subjects with prior psychiatric diagnoses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted. 13,048 subjects were included; 1191 took an antidepressant; 402 discontinued an antidepressant. In multivariable analyses examining the first year after exposure, antidepressant use was not significantly associated with risk of a depression, any mood disorder (including depression, mania, and other mood disorders), or anxiety. Antidepressant discontinuation was significantly associated with increased risk of depression, but not any mood disorder or anxiety. Among persons with migraine with no known psychiatric diagnosis, antidepressants did not appear to be associated with indicators of tardive dysphoria. Antidepressant discontinuation, however, was associated with increased risk of a depression diagnosis.

Risk for Medication Nonadherence Among Medicaid Enrollees With Fibromyalgia: Development of a Validated Risk Prediction Tool

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a risk assessment tool called the Prescription Medication Non-Adherence Prediction Tool (Rx-NAPT) to predict medication nonadherence in patients with fibromyalgia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using claims data from South Carolina Medicaid. Patients with fibromyalgia who were ≥18 years old and who had filled at least 1 prescription medication for pregabalin, duloxetine, or milnacipran from January 1, 2005, through June 30, 2011 were included. Medication possession ratios (MPRs) were calculated to classify patients as adherent (MPR ≥ 80%) or nonadherent (MPR < 80%). Multivariable logistic models using 100 bootstrap replications (with replacement) were used to identify factors associated with medication nonadherence, including age, gender, race, days' supply, medication type, and fibromyalgia-related comorbidity score. Weighted β coefficients of the predictors were used to create the Rx-NAPT. Youden's J statistic was used to classify nonadherent patients into different levels of risk.

RESULTS

The study sample comprised 6,626 patients with fibromyalgia, where 4,804 (72.50%) were non-adherent and 1,822 (27.50%) were adherent to their prescribed medication(s). Logistic regression models showed that 7 predictors (gender, age, race, fibromyalgia-related comorbidity score, medication type, health maintenance organization coverage, emergency room visit) were statistically significant in ≥50% of the bootstrapped samples. The final model demonstrated reasonable discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.6224) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit; P > 0.05) statistics and was validated internally (AUC = 0.6372).

CONCLUSION

Poor adherence with medication remains an important barrier to providing optimal care. Our risk prediction model provides an easy tool to help clinicians better identify patients with fibromyalgia who may not take their medications as prescribed.

Healthcare Costs and Medication Adherence Among Patients with Fibromyalgia: Combination Medication vs. Duloxetine, Milnacipran, Venlafaxine, and Pregabalin Initiators

OBJECTIVE

To examine medication adherence and healthcare costs for combination prescription initiators (duloxetine/milnacipran/venlafaxine with pregabalin) vs. monotherapy initiators (duloxetine, milnacipran, venlafaxine, and pregabalin) among patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

METHODS

Our retrospective cohort study used claims data for the South Carolina Blue Cross Blue Shield State Health Plan (SHP). Patients with FMS ≥ 18 years of age, with prescription initiation from July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2010, and SHP enrollment for 12 months pre- and post-index periods were included (combination: n = 100; pregabalin: n = 665; duloxetine: n = 713; milnacipran: n = 131; venlafaxine: n = 272). Medication adherence measures included high adherence (medication possession ratio ≥ 80%) and total supply days. Healthcare costs comprised direct medical expenditures. Propensity score methods of inverse probability of treatment weights were used to control for selection bias due to differing pre-index characteristics.

RESULTS

Odds ratios for high adherence were significantly increased (P < 0.05) among the combination cohort vs. the venlafaxine (2.15), duloxetine (1.39), and pregabalin (2.20) cohorts. Rate ratios for total supply days were significantly higher (P < 0.05) for combination vs. venlafaxine (1.23), duloxetine (1.08), and pregabalin (1.32) cohorts. Expenditures for total health care were significantly higher (P < 0.05) for combination vs. duloxetine ($26,291 vs. $17,190), milnacipran ($33,638 vs. $22,886), and venlafaxine ($26,586 vs. $16,857) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication adherence was considerably better for combination prescription initiators; however, expenditures for total health care were higher. Still, our findings suggest important clinical benefits with the use of combination prescription therapy, and prospective studies of medication adherence are warranted to examine causal relationships with outcomes not captured by healthcare claims databases.

Escitalopram vs duloxetine in acute treatment of major depressive disorder: meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence indicated that efficacy of escitalopram (Esc) and duloxetine (Dul) was comparable in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Since such studies had small sample sizes, this study purposefully applied a systematic review to determine the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability those antidepressants in treatment of MDD.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

The following primary databases were searched in July 2017: Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Esc comparison with Dul in the treatment of MDD were included in this review. The primary efficacy of outcome was the pooled mean-changed scores of the rating scales for the standardized rating scales for depression.

RESULTS

A total of 1,120 randomized subjects from 3 RCTs were collected for synthesis in the present meta-analysis. The mean-changed scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Clinical Global Impression - Severity, overall response rate by the HAMD, and remission rate by the HAMD and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in the Esc- and Dul-treated groups showed no significant differences. However, the mean-changed score of the MARDS, mean-end scores of Clinical Global Impression - Improvement, and overall response by the MADRS in the Esc-treated group were greater than that of the Dul-treated group. Although the overall discontinuation rate had no significant differences between the 2 groups, the discontinuation rate due to adverse events in the Esc-treated group was greater than that of the Dul-treated group.

LIMITATIONS

This review had limited eligible studies.

CONCLUSION

This review indicated the efficacy in the acute treatment of Esc vs Dul varied relying on measurements across the studies. However, the tolerability of Esc was superior to Dul in acute MDD treatment. Therefore, selection between the 2 antidepressants may depend on the tolerability of MDD patients. Due to limited included studies in this review, more large-scale and well-defined RCTs in such patients should be carried out to determine these outcomes.

Adherence and Persistence Across Antidepressant Therapeutic Classes: A Retrospective Claims Analysis Among Insured US Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

BACKGROUND

Adherence and persistence to therapy, or how well a patient follows provider directions on frequency and time to discontinuation of prescribed medications, is associated with positive health outcomes, including decreased healthcare costs and patient mortality. A clear literature gap exists assessing adherence and persistence to antidepressants (ADs) in the major depressive disorder (MDD) population at clinically relevant time points and at the therapeutic class level.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed adherence and persistence to specific ADs, therapeutic classes, and AD therapy overall at multiple time points among US individuals from commercial, Medicare supplemental, and Medicaid insurance plans.

METHODS

Patients with MDD without AD or MDD claims in the prior 6 months who initiated therapy in 2003-2014 with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), tricyclic AD (TCA), monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), or other AD were identified using MarketScan^® databases. These databases contain information on diagnoses, billing codes, and dates of service. Adherence (proportion of days covered) and persistence (days until a 30-day gap in therapy) were calculated to AD medication, AD therapeutic class, and AD therapy overall over the first 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from the index prescription date. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of adherence to initial AD medication comparing AD therapeutic classes.

RESULTS

For 527,907 patients, adherence to initial AD medication decreased over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (41, 31, 24, and 21%, respectively). Similar patterns were observed for adherence to initial AD therapeutic class, AD therapy overall, and all three persistence calculations. The odds of adherence to SNRIs versus SSRIs were 20-27% greater at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (ORs 1.20, 1.23, 1.25, 1.27, respectively; p-values all <0.0001). Similar or significantly lower odds of adherence were demonstrated for other classes versus SSRIs at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months [ORs for other ADs 0.80, 0.77, 0.74, 0.72, respectively (p-values all <0.0001); ORs for TCAs 0.46, 0.45, 0.47, 0.49, respectively (p-values all <0.0001); ORs for MAOIs 1.13, 1.0, 0.77, 0.69, respectively (p-values all >0.05)].

CONCLUSION

We found low adherence and persistence to ADs in the MDD population. Within the limitations of the insurance claims data we analysed, our results suggest that adherence may differ based on therapeutic class, as patients initiating SNRI therapy appeared to have a higher likelihood of adherence versus SSRIs over the year assessed, while the odds of adherence appeared similar or lower for other classes versus SSRIs. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these findings and determine additional drivers of these apparent differences by AD therapeutic class.

A randomised, double-blinded study comparing giving etoricoxib vs. placebo to female patients with fibromyalgia

OBJECTIVES

Current therapeutic approaches to fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) do not provide satisfactory pain control to a high percentage of patients. This unmet need constantly fuels the pursuit for new modalities for pain relief. This randomised, double-blind, controlled study assessed the efficacy and safety of adding etoricoxib vs. placebo to the current therapeutic regimen of female patients with FMS.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, female patients were randomised to receive either 90 mg etoricoxib once daily or placebo for 6 weeks. Several physical and mental parameters were assessed throughout the study. The primary end-point was the response to treatment, defined as ≥ 30% reduction in the average Brief Pain Inventory score. Secondary outcomes were changes in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, SF-36 Quality of Life assessment questionnaire and Hamilton rating scales for anxiety and depression.

RESULTS

Overall, 73 patients were recruited. Although many outcome measures improved throughout the study, no difference was recorded between the etoricoxib- and placebo-treated groups. The Brief Pain Inventory, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, The Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scores did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomised, double-blind study assessing the effect of adding etoricoxib to pre-existing medications for female patients with FMS. Although being mildly underpowered this study clearly has shown that etoricoxib did not improve pain scores and did not lead to any beneficial mental or physical effects.

Analysis of treatment patterns and persistence on branded and generic medications in major depressive disorder using retrospective claims data

BACKGROUND

In major depressive disorder (MDD), treatment persistence is critical to optimize symptom remission, functional recovery, and health care costs. Desvenlafaxine tends to have fewer drug interactions and better tolerability than other MDD drugs; however, its use has not been assessed in the real world.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to compare medication persistence and concomitant MDD drug use with branded desvenlafaxine (Pristiq^®) compared with antidepressant drug groups classified as 1) branded selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; ie, escitalopram [Lexapro™]) and selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; ie, venlafaxine [Effexor^®], duloxetine [Cymbalta^®]) and 2) generic SSRIs/SNRIs (ie, escitalopram, citalopram, venlafaxine, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, and duloxetine).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MDD patients (ICD-9-CM codes 296.2, 296.3), with ≥2 prescription fills for study drugs and 12-month preindex continuous enrollment from the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (2009-2013), were included. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (prescription gap ≥45 days) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox model. Concomitant MDD drug use was compared.

RESULTS

Of the 273,514 patients included, 14,379 patients were initiated with branded desvenlafaxine, 50,937 patients with other branded SSRIs/SNRIs, and 208,198 patients with generic SSRIs/SNRIs. The number of weeks for treatment discontinuation for branded desvenlafaxine were longer (40.7 [95% CI: 39.3, 42.0]) compared with other branded SSRIs/SNRIs (28.9 [95% CI: 28.4, 29.1]) and generic SSRIs/SNRIs (33.4 [95% CI: 33.1, 33.7]). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients who were prescribed with other branded SSRIs/SNRIs were 31% and generic SSRIs/SNRIs were 11% more likely to discontinue treatment compared with branded desvenlafaxine. In sensitivity analysis, the risk of discontinuation was within 10% of branded desvenlafaxine for branded duloxetine, generic escitalopram, and generic venlafaxine. Concomitant MDD drug use was higher among branded desvenlafaxine patients (43.8%) compared with other branded SSRIs/SNRIs (39.8%) and generic SSRIs/SNRIs (36.4%).

CONCLUSION

MDD patients on branded desvenlafaxine were more persistent with treatment compared with those on other branded or generic SSRI/SNRI therapies. Future research should include assessments of underlying factors on the treatment persistence in MDD patients.

Stroke associated with discontinuation of warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the association between warfarin discontinuation and stroke among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study of adult NVAF patients (≥ 18 years) who were on warfarin in the Truven MarketScan commercial claims and encounters and Medicare supplemental and coordination of benefits databases (1 January 2008 to 30 June 2012). Warfarin discontinuation was defined as a gap of ≥ 45 days in warfarin prescription within 1 year after initiation. Patients who did and did not discontinue warfarin were matched at a 1:1 ratio using a propensity score method. Matched patients were followed for up to 1 year to determine risks of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and hemorrhagic stroke. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to further adjust for the effects of potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 27,000 patients were included. Patients who discontinued warfarin had higher rates of ischemic stroke compared to persistent patients (1.0 vs. 0.5 per 100 patient years, P < 0.01), but similar rates of TIA (1.2 vs. 0.9 per 100 patient years, respectively; P = 0.07) and hemorrhagic stroke (0.3 vs. 0.2 per 100 patient years, P = 0.31). After adjustment for potential confounders, warfarin discontinuation was significantly associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-2.84), TIA (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.04-1.78), and ischemic stroke or TIA (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.20-1.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin discontinuation is associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke and TIA. Health care providers may need to take a more active role in the management of warfarin discontinuation and clinical outcomes, e.g., by considering newer anticoagulants with favorable risk-benefit profiles. Key limitations of the study include unavailability of important clinical factors and measures in claims data.

Discontinuation/Interruption of Warfarin Therapy in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Use of warfarin is standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, AF patients experience high rates of warfarin discontinuation/interruption, resulting in increased health risks and health care costs. As such, it is important to study the rates and predictors of warfarin discontinuation/interruption in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine (a) rates of warfarin discontinuation and interruption and (b) demographic, clinical, and health care-related factors associated with discontinuation and interruption in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) in the usual clinical practice settings in the United States.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the MarketScan Database and included patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with NVAF who were initiated on warfarin. The study period was January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2012. To be included, patients were required to have at least 2 claims with AF diagnosis separated by ≥ 30 days and ≤ 12 months and at least 1 outpatient claim. Warfarin initiation had to occur within 30 days of the AF diagnosis. Patients also had to have continuous enrollment in prescription drug plans from 6 months prior to warfarin use to at least 12 months after warfarin initiation. Patients were followed for 1 year after warfarin initiation. Persistence was defined as warfarin therapy without a gap ≥ 45 days between the end date of the former prescription and the start date of the current prescription or with international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring at least every 42 days. Interruption was defined as a gap in warfarin therapy ≥ 45 days and ≤ 90 days between the end date of the former prescription and the start date of the current prescription and without INR monitoring at least every 42 days. Discontinuation was defined as greater than 90 days without warfarin therapy between the end date of the former prescription and the start date of the current prescription and without INR monitoring at least every 42 days. Chi-square tests were used to analyze categorical variables, and independent samples t-tests were used for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to determine factors associated with warfarin discontinuation/interruption, including demographic (e.g., age, gender); clinical (e.g., comorbidities, CHADS2 score); and health care-related (e.g., hospitalizations or emergency room visits) characteristics. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying prescription gaps by 7, 14, and 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 58,593 patients with NVAF were included. The mean age was approximately 71 years (SD = 12.00) and mean CHADS2 score was 1.66 (SD = 1.23). The majority of patients were male (60%). During 12 months after warfarin initiation, 45% of patients were persistent with warfarin; 12% had interruption without discontinuation; and 43% had discontinuation. The risk of warfarin interruption or discontinuation was significantly greater in patients who were younger than 65 years (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.19-1.25), lived in the West (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.03-1.11), had history of anemia (HR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.06-1.14), had history of bleeding (HR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.06-1.14), or had history of hospitalization or emergency room visits (HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.08-1.13). The significant factors associated with interruption and discontinuation were similar. In the sensitivity analyses, the significant factors associated with discontinuation/interruption were similar across different prescription gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

In the U.S. clinical practice setting, more than 50% of NVAF patients discontinued or interrupted warfarin within 1 year after initiation. Aged less than  65 years, history of anemia, and history of hospitalization/emergency room visits were associated with increased risk of discontinuation/interruption. Given the high prevalence of warfarin discontinuation/interruption, health care providers should take a more active role in understanding and addressing the reasons behind patient discontinuation/interruption.

Factors predicting adherence to antidepressant treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Poor adherence and discontinuation of treatment are the major challenges of pharmacotherapy among patients with depression. This article reviews the factors predicting adherence to and persistence of antidepressant treatment identified in recent years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Study populations have been extended to subgroups of patients with depression or depressive patients with comorbid medical conditions. Some studies have investigated the issues by analysing medical claims databases. Socio-demographic variables, clinical features of depression, comorbidities, pharmacological factors, attitudes towards antidepressants, previous experiences of antidepressant treatment, patient-professional relationship and genes were found to be common factors. An older age, positive attitudes to antidepressants and previous experiences and vicarious experiences of depression or treatment were found to be factors predicting better adherence or persistence. Conversely, patients in minority groups, those with a low family income, pregnancy, experience of side effects, dissatisfaction with treatment and a poor patient-professional relationship were found to be associated with poorer adherence or persistence.

SUMMARY

The factors predicting adherence and persistence are complex and interactive. Different methods of studies have limitations in terms of exploring all these factors. Future studies should integrate these factors simultaneously and explore specific factors predicting adherence and persistence among subgroups of patients with depression.

Assessment and management of chronic pain in patients with depression and anxiety

This article will review the role of the pharmacist in the management of chronic pain in patients with comorbid mood disorders.

Pharmacometric Analyses to Support Early Development Decisions for LY2878735: A Novel Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor

LY2878735 is a novel dual serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)) and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) in development for chronic pain indications. In vitro profile suggests a more balanced profile as compared with other SNRI's, which is expected to confer superior clinical efficacy. LY2878735 is metabolized partly by the genetically polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 pathway, raising pharmacokinetic (PK) variability concerns. Phase 1 PK and biomarker data were analyzed by pharmacometric methods to characterize the balance between dual-target engagement and adverse effects on heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). A narrow range of plasma LY2878735 levels was associated with an acceptable balance. As compared with poor metabolizers (PM), CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) have 21- and threefold higher clearance and distribution volume, respectively. Even with a CYP2D6-based dosing paradigm, a superior therapeutic index comparable to duloxetine, a widely used SNRI, was not achievable and LY2878735 development was thus terminated. Model-based approach effectively synthesizes PK-pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships, enabling efficient early development decisions.

[Integral Care Guide for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Depressive Episodes and Recurrent Depressive Disorder in Adults. Integral Attention of Adults with a Diagnosis of Depressive Episodes and Recurrent Depressive Disorder: Part II: General Aspects of Treatment, Management of the Acute Phase, Continuation and Maintenance of Patients with a Depression Diagnosis]

INTRODUCTION

This article presents recommendations based on evidence gathered to answer a series of clinical questions concerning the depressive episode and the recurrent depressive disorder, with emphasis on general treatment aspects, treatment in the acute phase and management of the continuation/maintenance, all intended to grant health care parameters based on the best and more updated available evidence for achieving minimum quality standards with adult patients thus diagnosed.

METHODOLOGY

A practical clinical guide was elaborated according to standards of the Methodological Guide of the Ministry of Social Protection. Recommendation from NICE90 and CANMAT guides were adopted and updated so as to answer the questions posed while de novo questions were developed.

RESULTS

Recommendations 5-22 corresponding to management of depression are presented.

Duloxetine in affective disorders: a naturalistic study on psychiatric and medical comorbidity, use in association and tolerability across different age groups

Objective:

Duloxetine, a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), is currently approved in many countries for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). The present naturalistic study was aimed to investigate tolerability of Duloxetine in a sample of patients with affective disorders and psychiatric/medical comorbidity, comparing tolerability in monotherapy versus polytherapy and across different age groups.

Methods:

The sample included 165 patients, affected by anxiety and/or mood disorders with or without comorbidity, who had been taken Duloxetine for at least 1 month. Sample variables were collected through a retrospective chart review.

Results:

Most common primary diagnoses were MDD (49.1 %), Bipolar Disorder (BD) (15.7 %) and GAD (5.5%). The 40 % of the sample had psychiatric comorbidity: in particular, anxiety disorders (15.8 %) (GAD 7.9%, Panic Disorder –PD- 7.3%) and personality disorders (9.1%) as the most frequent ones. With respect to medical comorbidities (68% of the sample), hypertension (12.1%) and diabetes (7.3%) were the most common ones. Mean duration of treatment and dosage of Duloxetine were, respectively, 11 months (± 9.1) and 70 mg/day (± 28.6). The 68 % of the sample received Duloxetine in association with other drugs. Minor side-effects, in particular drowsiness and gastrointestinal problems, were reported by 15 % of the sample. No difference in terms of tolerability across distinct groups, divided on the basis of mono- vs polytherapy as well as of different age, was found.

Conclusion:

Duloxetine, mostly administered in patients with affective disorders with psychiatric/ medical comorbidity and in association with other drugs, appeared to be well tolerated, showing limited rates of side effects of mild intensity. Further naturalistic studies are warranted to confirm present results.