Leukotriene D4 bronchial provocation test: methodology and diagnostic value

Observation of the Effect of Singulair Combined With Ketotifen in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Its Influence on Th17/Treg

Objective

To investigate the effect of montelukast sodium (singulair) combined with ketotifen fumarate on the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) with airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and its effect on helper T cells 17 (Th17)/regulator T cells (Treg).

Methods

168 patients with AECOPD and AHR diagnosed in our hospital from February 2018 to December 2019 were selected, and divided into the observation group (n = 84) and the control group (n = 84). Both groups were given anti infection, bronchodilator, glucocorticoid, phosphodiesterase inhibitor, cough and expectorant. The observation group was additionally treated with singulair tablets and ketotifen tablets for 14 days. The curative effect were observed after treatment. The first second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1 as percentage of predicted value (FEV1% pred), blood oxygen pressure (PaO₂) and blood carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO₂), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), Th17 and Treg levels were measured in both groups before and after treatment.

Results

Compared with the control group, the total effective rate after treatment in the observation group was increased (94.05 vs. 75.00%, P < 0.05). Compared with before treatment, the FEV1, FVC and FEV1%pred levels of the two groups of patients after treatment were increased (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the FEV1, FVC and FEV1%pred levels of the observation group were increased after treatment (P < 0.05). Compared with before treatment, the PaCO2, hs-CRP and PCT levels of the two groups of patients were reduced after treatment, and PaO2 levels were increased (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the PaCO2, hs-CRP and PCT levels in the observation group were reduced after treatment, and the PaO2 level was increased (P < 0.05). Compared with before treatment, Th17 and Th17/Treg levels of the two groups of patients were reduced after treatment, and Treg levels were increased (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the Th17 and Th17/Treg levels of the observation group were reduced after treatment, and the Treg levels was increased (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Singulair combined with ketotifen in the treatment of patients with AECOPD combined with AHR can significantly improve the efficacy, improve lung function, reduce inflammatory response, and improve the balance of Th17/Treg, effectively controlling the disease.

Leukotriene D4 role in allergic asthma pathogenesis from cellular and therapeutic perspectives

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory and allergic disease that is mainly characterized by reversible airway obstruction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The incidence of asthma is increasing with more than 350 million people worldwide are affected. Up to now, there is no therapeutic option for asthma and most of the prescribed drugs aim to ameliorate the symptoms of the disease especially during the acute exacerbations after trigger exposure. Asthma is a heterogonous disease that involves interactions between inflammatory mediators and cellular components within the disease microenvironment including inflammatory and structural cells. Cysteinyl leukotrienes (cys-LTs) are inflammatory lipid mediators that have potent roles in asthma pathogenesis. CysLTs consisting of LTC₄, LTD₄, and LTE₄ are mainly secreted by leukocytes and act through three main G-protein coupled receptors (CysLT₁R, CysLT₂R, and CysLT₃R). LTD₄ is the most potent bronchoconstrictor which gives it the priority to be discussed in detail in this review. LTD₄ binds with high affinity to CysLT₁R and many studies showed that using CysLT₁R antagonists such as montelukast has a beneficial effect for asthmatics especially in corticosteroid refractory cases. Since asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of many cell types involved in the disease pathogenies and LTD₄ has a special role in inflammation and bronchoconstriction, this review highlights the role of LTD₄ on each cellular component in asthma and the benefits of using CysLT₁R antagonists in ameliorating LTD₄-induced effects.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Combined with Pulmonary Function Parameters Shows Increased Sensitivity and Specificity for the Diagnosis of Cough Variant Asthma in Children

Background

Cough variant asthma in children presents with a dry nonproductive cough. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with small airway functional parameters in cough variant asthma.

Material/Methods

Children with asthma (n=136) were divided into a cough variant asthma (CVA) group (n=57; mean age, 8.03±2.1 years) and a non-cough variant asthma (nCVA) group (n=79; mean age, 8.61±1.7 years). In both groups, FeNO and other pulmonary function parameters were measured including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), forced expiratory flow (FEF), and maximum expiratory flow at 25%, 50%, and 75% expired volume (MEF25, MEF50, and MEF75). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis compared the sensitivity and specificity between the diagnostic parameters.

Results

The FeNO values were significantly increased in the CVA group compared with the nCVA group (Z=6.890, p<0.001). The MMEF, MEF25, MEF50, and MEF75 values were significantly lower in the CVA group compared with the nCVA group (p=0.000, p=0.014, p=0.000, and p=0.000, respectively). The FeNO values were negatively correlated with MEF25, MEF50, and MMEF (r=−0.334, r=−0.257 and r=−0.276, respectively). FeNO was significantly more efficient diagnosing cough variant asthma comparing with pulmonary parameters (p<0.05), and was most sensitive and specific when combined with MMEF/MEF50 compared with single diagnostic parameters (p<0.05).

Conclusions

FeNO combined with pulmonary function parameters of MMEF/MEF50 showed increased sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cough variant asthma.

Effects of leukotriene D4 nasal challenge on bronchial responsiveness and inflammation in asthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

In asthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), increased cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) production in the secretion of nasal mucosa has been associated with greater bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) after nasal allergen challenge. However, the role of CysLTs in eliciting BHR after nasal allergen challenge has not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of LTD₄ nasal challenge on BHR and inflammation in asthmatic patients with AR.

METHODS

In this self-controlled study, fifteen eligible consecutively recruited subjects underwent methacholine (Mch) bronchial provocation test before and 30 minutes after LTD₄ nasal provocation test. The cumulative concentration of LTD₄ inducing a 60% increase in nasal airway resistance (PC₆₀NAR) was calculated. The mean values of cumulative doses inducing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory flow in one second (PD₂₀FEV₁) for Mch before and after nasal challenge were compared. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), differential inflammatory cell counts in nasal lavage and induced sputum before and after nasal challenge were compared.

RESULTS

House dust mites were the major allergens accounting for 10/15 (66.7%) of asthmatic patients with AR. The PC₆₀NAR for LT was (8.39±3.48)×10^-3 mg·mL^-1. The PD₂₀FEV₁ before and after nasal challenge was 3.05±3.81 and 2.70±3.81 µmol, respectively (P=0.45). The percentages of eosinophils were (38.36±23.14)% and (45.70±24.86)% in nasal lavage, and (17.51±11.05)% and (24.29±16.52)% in induced sputum before and 24 hours after nasal challenge. The neutrophil counts were (60.64±23.14)% and (53.30±24.46)% in nasal lavage, and (53.83±23.27)% and (56.19±22.28)% in induced sputum before and 24 hours after nasal challenge. The values of FeNO were 40 [35] and 43 [30] ppb before and 24 hours after nasal challenge. No severe adverse effects were reported during the tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most asthmatic patients with AR were sensitive to LTD₄ nasal challenge, LTD₄ nasal provocation tests do not confer any major effect on BHR. LTD₄ might not play a vital role in eliciting bronchial responsiveness induced by nasal allergen challenge.

Leukotriene D4 nasal provocation test: Rationale, methodology and diagnostic value

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (LT) play a vital role in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis (AR), but few studies have investigated the nasal mucosal physiological response to LTs in AR patients. The aim of the present study was to establish the methodology and investigate the diagnostic value and safety of a leukotriene D4 (LTD4) nasal provocation test. LTD4 nasal provocation tests were performed in 26 AR patients and 16 normal control subjects. Nasal airway responsiveness was assessed by calculating the concentration of LTD4 required to cause a 60% increase in nasal airway resistance (PC60NAR-LTD4), which was measured using rhinomanometry and a composite symptom score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to evaluate the diagnostic value of LTD4 nasal provocation test, and adverse events were recorded. The study protocol was registered with the U.S. National Institutes of Health (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01963741). PC60NAR-LTD4 in AR was significantly lower compared with that of normal controls [8.36 (IQR, 10.00) vs. 17.00 (IQR, 0.00) µg/ml, P=0.005]. Composite symptom score was higher in AR as compared with normal controls (1.19±0.94 vs. 0.12±0.50, P<0.001). The symptom scores included sneezing (0.12±0.34 vs. 0.00±0.00, P=0.149), rhinorrhea (0.79±0.66 vs. 0.06±0.25, P<0.001) and chemosis or itching of the eyes (0.06±0.25 vs. 0.21±0.42, P=0.216). High diagnostic value was indicated by the ROC [AUC: 0.822, 95%CI (0.665, 0.961)]. No serious adverse events were observed. Thus, the present results indicate that AR patients exhibited nasal hyperactivity to LTD4, and the established procedure of LTD4 nasal provocation testing is effective and safe for use in the diagnosis of AR.

Adenosine monophosphate is not superior to histamine for bronchial provocation test for assessment of asthma control and symptoms

BACKGROUND

Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) may reflect airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, but relationship between AMP and histamine (His, a conventional stimulus) bronchial provocation test (BPT) in asthma is not fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

To compare both BPTs and determine their utility in reflecting changes of asthmatic symptoms.

METHODS

BPTs were performed in a cross-over fashion, at 2-4 day intervals. Cumulative doses eliciting 20% FEV₁ fall (PD₂₀ FEV₁ ), diagnostic performance and adverse events (AEs) were compared. Patients with PD₂₀ FEV₁ lower than geometric mean were defined as responders, otherwise poor responders. Patients with uncontrolled and partly controlled asthma, who maintained their original inhaled corticosteroids therapy, underwent reassessment of airway responsiveness and asthmatic symptoms 3 and 6 months after.

RESULTS

Nineteen uncontrolled, 22 partly controlled and 19 controlled asthmatic patients and 24 healthy subjects were recruited. Lower PD₂₀ FEV₁ geometric means were associated with poorer asthma control in His-BPT (0.424 μmol vs 1.684 μmol vs 3.757 μmol), but not AMP-BPT (11.810 μmol vs 7.781 μmol vs 10.220 μmol). Both BPTs yielded similar overall diagnostic performance in asthma (area under curve: 0.842 in AMP-BPT vs 0.850 in His-BPT). AEs, including wheezing and tachypnea, were similar and mild. Ten patients with uncontrolled and 10 partly controlled asthma were followed-up. At months 3 and 6, we documented an increase in PD₂₀ FEV₁ -AMP and PD₂₀ FEV₁ -His, which did not correlate with reduction asthmatic symptom scores. This overall applied in responders and poor responders of AMP-BPT and His-BPT.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher screening capacity of well-controlled asthma, AMP-BPT confers similar diagnostic performance and safety with His-BPT. AMP-BPT might not preferentially reflect changes asthmatic symptoms.

Responsiveness to methacholine, but not leukotriene D4, correlates with fractional exhaled nitric oxide in asthma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Correlation between fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and responsiveness to inhaled leukotriene D4 (LTD4 ) and methacholine (MCh) might be different. This study aims to determine the correlation between FeNO and airway responsiveness to LTD4 and MCh, and to compare the airway responsiveness to inhaled LTD4 and MCh and FeNO in non-smokers, patients without rhinitis and non-smokers without rhinitis.

METHODS

In this cross-over study, asthmatic patients and healthy subjects underwent LTD4 and MCh inhalation challenge at a 2- to 14-day interval. The FeNO was measured by using NIOX MINO, a portable instrument, at the initial visit, before spirometry and inhalation challenge tests. Subgroup analyses were performed in asthmatic patients based on the categorisation of never-smoker group, non-rhinitis group and never-smoker without rhinitis group.

RESULTS

Of 62 asthmatic patients enrolled, 43 did not have self-reported rhinitis (asthmatic patients without rhinitis), 56 were never-smokers (asthmatic non-smokers), giving rise to 37 non-smokers who did not have rhinitis (asthmatic non-smokers without rhinitis). Twenty-one healthy subjects were enrolled. Overall, Log10 FeNO correlated with Log10 PD20 FEV1 -MCh but not Log10 PD20 FEV1 -LTD4 or Log10 (LTD4 /MCh potency ratio). Reduced FeNO was associated with significantly higher Log10 PD20 FEV1 -MCh but not Log10 PD20 FEV1 -LTD4 , except for non-smokers. Compared with all asthmatic patients, asthmatic non-smokers without rhinitis were characterised by markedly reduced levels of Log10 PD20 FEV1 -MCh but not Log10 PD20 FEV1 -LTD4 . The difference in all parameters did not reach statistical significance among asthmatic patients without rhinitis, asthmatic non-smokers and asthmatic non-smokers without rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

FeNO correlates with airway responsiveness to inhaled MCh but not LTD4 , in asthmatic patients, particularly in asthmatic non-smokers without rhinitis.

Response--dose ratio is a surrogate of cumulative provocative dosage for bronchial provocation tests in asthma

BACKGROUND

Response-dose ratio (RDR) and cumulative provocative dosage (PD) are useful indices reflecting airway responsiveness in asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic value of RDR and PD, by conducting leukotriene D4 (LTD4-BPT) and methacholine bronchial provocation test (MCh-BPT), in different asthma control levels.

METHODS

Healthy subjects and asthmatic patients underwent LTD4-BPT and MCh-BPT, at 2-14-day interval. This entailed assessment of the distribution characteristics, correlation, and diagnostic value of PD inducing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PD20FEV1) and the RDR, defined as FEV1 fall (%) at the final step divided by the corresponding provocative dosage.

RESULTS

Twenty uncontrolled, 22 partly controlled, 20 controlled asthmatics, and 21 healthy subjects were enrolled. Log10RDR was positively correlated with log10PD20FEV1 in both BPTs (all P < 0.05). Poorer asthma control was associated with significantly lower PD20FEV1 and higher RDR (both P < 0.05). The differences in PD20FEV1 and RDR between partly controlled and controlled asthma were unremarkable (both P > 0.05). Compared with log10PD20FEV1, the log10RDR yielded similar diagnostic values in both BPTs. A lower percentile of RDR (≤ 25th percentile) was associated with higher baseline FEV1 (P < 0.05) and an increased proportion of well-controlled asthmatic patients. The combination of RDR and PD20FEV1 led to an increased diagnostic value compared with either parameter alone.

CONCLUSIONS

RDR is a surrogate of PD20FEV1 for BPTs in asthma. This finding was not modified by different asthma control levels or the types of bronchoprovocants.

Leukotriene D4 inhalation challenge for predicting short-term efficacy of montelukast: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The convenient measure to predict efficacy of leukotriene receptor antagonist is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if leukotriene D4 inhalation challenge predicts short-term efficacy of montelukast in asthma.

METHODS

In this open-labelled 28-day trial, 45 patients with asthma were allocated to leukotriene-sensitive and leukotriene-insensitive group to receive montelukast monotherapy (10 mg, once daily) based on the positive threshold of leukotriene D4 inhalation challenge test (4.800 nmol). Miscellaneous measurements comprised fractional exhaled nitric oxide, methacholine inhalation challenge, Asthma Control Test and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Peak expiratory flow was self-monitored throughout the treatment. End point assessments were performed 3 to 5 days after montelukast withdrawal.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients in leukotriene-sensitive group and 10 leukotriene-insensitive group completed the study. Both groups differed neither in 28-day peak expiratory flow rate nor in maximal weekly peak expiratory flow (both P > 0.05). However, minimal weekly peak expiratory flow was significantly higher in leukotriene-insensitive group throughout the treatment course (all P < 0.05) except for week 1 (P > 0.05). Both groups did not differ statistically in the post-treatment improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) predicted% prior to inhalation challenge, fractional exhaled nitric oxide or the airway responsiveness to leukotriene D4 or methacholine (all P > 0.05). There was a marked increase in Asthma Control Test score and the symptom score of Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire in both groups (both P < 0.05). The overall significance of Logistic regression model was unremarkable (P = 0.467).

CONCLUSION

Responsiveness to inhaled leukotriene D4 alone might not be sufficient to predict the short-term efficacy of montelukast monotherapy in patients with asthma.

Responsiveness to leukotriene D4 and methacholine for predicting efficacy of montelukast in asthma

A lower responsiveness to leukotriene D4 (LTD4) or higher LTD4/[methacholine (MCh)] potency ratio might suggest preferable outcomes of short-term montelukast monotherapy in terms of airway inflammation and lung function in asthmatic patients.

The effects of various doses of bacterial lipopolysaccharide on the expression of CD63 and the release of histamine by basophils of atopic and non-atopic patients

OBJECTIVE

We tested the effect of various doses of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin) on the expression of CD63 and the in vitro release of histamine by basophils stimulated with ragweed allergen in patients with or without ragweed and mite allergies.

METHODS

The peripheral blood of 11 patients with ragweed allergy, 10 patients with mite allergy and 14 control patients was incubated with ragweed allergen extract following pretreatment with varying doses of LPS. The expression of CD63 in basophils was measured by flow cytometry, and the release of histamine was determined by ELISA.

RESULTS

In the samples of patients with ragweed allergy that were exposed to specific allergen, only high doses of LPS significantly elevated the expression of CD63 (200 ng/ml; 1,000 EU/ml) and the release of histamine (2,000 ng/ml; 10,000 EU/ml). There was no effect of LPS in any other cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacterial LPS (endotoxin) concentrations higher than 200 ng/ml (1,000 EU/ml), which rarely occurs in nature, could only activate the basophils from atopic patients whilst in the presence of the specific allergen. Thus, the restoration of the urban, "microbe-poor" milieu with endotoxin (as LPS) can be a promising and harmless approach for allergy prevention.

Leukotriene D4 and methacholine bronchial provocation tests for identifying leukotriene-responsiveness subtypes

BACKGROUND

Both leukotriene D(4) (LTD(4)) and methacholine bronchial provocation tests are measurements of airway responsiveness; however, their correlation and distinction remain unexplored.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the 2 tests and classify leukotriene-responsiveness subtypes in asthmatic patients.

METHODS

In this randomized cross-over study we enrolled healthy subjects and asthmatic patients with different control statuses. All subjects underwent both tests with a 2- to 14-day interval. Distribution and correlation of cumulative doses inducing a 20% decrease in FEV(1), LTD(4)/methacholine potency ratio, diagnostic value, and adverse events were recorded and analyzed. Asthmatic patients with a lower cumulative dose for LTD(4) and a higher leukotriene/methacholine potency ratio than geometric means were regarded as leukotriene responsive.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with uncontrolled, 22 with partly controlled, and 20 with controlled asthma and 21 healthy subjects were enrolled. Geometric means of cumulative doses for LTD(4) and methacholine (0.272 nmol vs 0.945 μmol) were lowest in patients with uncontrolled asthma, followed by those with partly controlled (0.387 nmol vs 1.933 μmol) and controlled (1.484 nmol vs 3.946 μmol) asthma. The average potency ratio was highest in those with partly controlled asthma (5000.2), followed by those with uncontrolled (3477.7) and controlled (2702.6) asthma. Eighteen leukotriene-responsive asthmatic patients (29.03%) with a cumulative dose of LTD(4) of 0.533 nmol or less and a potency ratio of 3647 or greater were identified. Adverse events, including tachypnea and chest tightness, were similar and mild. No serious adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic value and safety were ideal in both tests. The combination of cumulative dose for LTD(4) and potency ratio might be useful to identify leukotriene-responsive asthmatic patients.