Tamsulosin combined with solifenacin versus tamsulosin monotherapy for male lower urinary tract symptoms: a meta-analysis

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of a Combination of Tamsulosin and Mirabegron versus Tamsulosin Alone in the Management of Overactive Bladder in Males with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms - TAME-Overactive Bladder: An Open-labeled Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition in elderly men with coexisting benign prostatic enlargement (BPE), and it significantly impairs their quality of life (QoL).

Aim

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of adding beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonist (mirabegron 50 mg) to tamsulosin 0.4 mg for symptomatic men with BPE and OAB symptoms (OABS).

Materials and Methods

It was an open-labeled randomized controlled trial. Ninety men with BPE and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of more than seven with predominant OABS were enrolled for the study. A detailed history, uroflowmetry, and baseline scores, including IPSS, OABS score (OABSS), and QoL assessment, were done for each patient. After written informed consent, patients were randomized into two groups of 45 each. Group-1 received tamsulosin 0.4 mg and placebo, and Group-2 received a combination of tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus mirabegron 50 mg once daily at bedtime. Follow-up of patients was done at 2nd, 4th, and 8th weeks. Efficacy at 8 weeks was assessed using repeat history for symptoms, uroflowmetry, IPSS, OABSS, and QoL score.

Results

After 8 weeks of therapy, collected data were compared to baseline parameters in both groups. Significant improvement with respect to OABSS (P = 0.046), IPSS (P = 0.006), and QoL (P = 0.038) was observed with combination therapy versus tamsulosin alone. There were mild adverse effects, which were self-limiting.

Conclusions

A combination of tamsulosin with mirabegron is effective and safe in improving the OABSS, IPSS, and QoL in men with BPE who have predominant OABS.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Drugs for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common in middle-aged and elderly men. The current drugs for treating this disease include α1-adrenoceptor antagonists (ABs), muscarinic receptor antagonists (MRAs), phosphodiesterase five inhibitors (PDE5-Is), and β3-adrenoceptor agonists (B3As). However, direct comparative studies analyzing different therapies are limited; therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of different drug regimens for treating BPH/LUTS. Methods: The PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different drug treatments for BPH/LUTS from January 2000 to April 2021. The NMA was performed using R 4.1 software. Results: Fifty-five RCTs were included among a total of 1639 trials. ① ABs + PDE5-Is, ABs + B3As, ABs + MRAs, ABs, and PDE5-IS were superior to the placebo in improving the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-Voiding, and IPSS-storage. ② For increasing the maximum flow rate (Qmax), ABs + PDE5-Is, ABs + MRAs, and ABs were more effective than the placebo. ③ Regarding reducing post-void residual urine (PVR), none of the six treatment plans had significant effects. Conclusion: Combination therapy showed greater efficacy than monotherapy, and ABs + PDE5-Is was the most successful treatment for improving the overall IPSS score. ABs are a primary therapeutic measure to increase Qmax, and ABs + PDE5-I may be a more suitable choice for enhancing Qmax. The combination of MRA and AB+ MRA may lead to an increase in PVR. Systematic Review Registration: [website], identifier [registration number].

Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron Add-on Therapy in Men With Persistent Storage Symptoms After Receiving Alpha 1-Blocker or Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of vibegron add-on therapy in men with persistent storage symptoms receiving α-1 blockers or PDE5 inhibitor for benign prostatic hyperplasia and then determine the independent factors affecting the efficacy of vibegron.

METHODS

Vibegron 50 mg was administered for 12 weeks to 42 patients (72.0 ± 8.2 years) with persistent storage symptoms who had taken α-1 blockers (22 patients) or PDE5 inhibitor (20 patients). The primary endpoint was change in the overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptom Score from baseline to end of treatment. The secondary endpoints were changes in each question of several questionnaires, maximum flow rate and residual urine volume. Finally, independent factors affecting the efficacy of vibegron were investigated.

RESULTS

Total OAB Symptom Score was significantly decreased (6.21 ± 3.12 vs 4.38 ± 2.46; P < .001). Although each score of several questionnaires, especially for storage symptoms, improved significantly, no significant improvement was found in stress incontinence, straining, bladder pain and urethral pain in the Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom score. Maximum flow rate and residual urine volume did not change, and no patient discontinued vibegron because of adverse events. Multiple regression analysis showed that OAB Symptom Score, Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom score, prostate volume and monotherapy with α-1 blocker were independent factors affecting the efficacy of vibegron.

CONCLUSION

Add-on therapy of vibegron to monotherapy with α-1 blockers or PDE5 inhibitor for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and persistent storage symptoms was effective and safe.

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Imidafenacin for Overactive Bladder Induced by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Receiving Alpha-Blocker Therapy

Purpose

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imidafenacin for overactive bladder (OAB) induced by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men receiving alpha-blocker monotherapy.

Methods

We performed a systematic research of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, and searched for studies about alpha-blocker with or without imidafenacin treatment for OAB in patients with BPH. We also investigated the original references of the included texts.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials including 779 participants with BPH (389 in the alpha-blocker+imidafenacin group and 390 in the alpha-blocker only group) were studied. The main efficacy endpoint was the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, which showed a mean difference of -1.88 (95% confidence interval, -2.32 to -1.44; P<0.00001), suggesting that alpha-blocker and imidafenacin treatment was effective in treating men with OAB. As other primary efficacy end points, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) total score (P=0.47), the IPSS storage symptom score (P=0.07), the IPSS voiding symptom score (P=0.60), and the IPSS quality of life score (P=0.18) indicated that 2 methods had no significant differences in treating men with OAB. In terms of safety, which was assessed using postvoid residual volume (P=0.05) and maximum flow rate (P=0.53), the analysis suggested that combination treatment was very well tolerated.

Conclusions

This study suggested that imidafenacin plus alpha-blocker was an efficacious and safe treatment for OAB symptoms in BPH patients.

Effects of Tamsulosin Combined With Solifenacin on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Evidence From a Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This study is aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin combined with solifenacin and provide clinical evidence for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang data information service platform were searched to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tamsulosin combined with solifenacin in the treatment of BPH with LUTS. After extraction of the data, the statistical information was calculated by means of STATA 12.0. The publication bias was calculated using Egger's test and Begg's funnel plot. A total of 17 articles contained 1,870 patients treated with tamsulosin in combination with solifenacin and 1,897 patients treated with tamsulosin only were included in this study. Results show that tamsulosin combined with solifenacin therapy was more effective in reducing the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (TIPSS), Storage International Prostate Symptom Score (SIPSS), Quality of life (QOL), and Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) in comparison with tamsulosin monotherapy treatment. However, it was found that the combination therapy may increase levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the maximal urinary flow rate (QMAX). Differences between the combination therapy and tamsulosin monotherapy were not statistically significant for urgency episodes per 24 h, micturitions per 24 h, Voiding International Prostate Symptom Score (VIPSS), and postvoid residual volume (PVR). Tamsulosin combined with solifenacin therapy is more effective than tamsulosin monotherapy for the treatment of BPH concurrent with LUTS and won't increase the risk of dysuria.

Efficacy and Side Effects of Drugs Commonly Used for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common benign disease of the prostate gland and is caused by benign hyperplasia of the smooth muscle cells and stromal cells in this important gland. BPH is also the most common disease underlying lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The incidence of BPH increases with age and affects more than half of all men 50 years or older. BPH mainly exerts effects on urinary function and can seriously reduce a patient's quality of life. At present, treatment for BPH aims primarily to improve the quality of life and reduce the risk of BPH-related complications. Pharmacological therapy is recommended for moderate-to-severe cases of LUTS that are suggestive of BPH. A range of drugs is currently available to treat this condition, including α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), muscarinic receptor antagonists (MRAs), β3-adrenoceptor agonists, and plant extracts. Of these, the most commonly used drugs in the clinic are α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, 5-ARIs, and combination therapy. However, these drugs exert their effects via various mechanisms and are associated with adverse reactions. The purpose of this review is to provide current comprehensive perspectives on the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and adverse reactions associated with the drugs most commonly used for the treatment of BPH.

The efficacy and safety of mirabegron on overactive bladder induced by benign prostatic hyperplasia in men receiving tamsulosin therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron on overactive bladder (OAB) induced by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men receiving tamsulosin therapy.

METHODS

We performed the analysis by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were retrieved to get information regarding randomized controlled trials of mirabegron on OAB induced by BPH in men receiving tamsulosin therapy. We also searched the references of included literatures.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials containing a total of 1317 BPH patients were included in the analysis. Co-primary efficacy end points: the mean number of micturitions per day [the mean difference (MD) = -0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.46 to -0.09, P = .004], the urgency episodes per day (the MD = -0.50, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.22, P = .0004), the total OAB symptom score (the MD = -0.69, 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.38, P < .0001), and mean volume voided (the MD = 10.76, 95% CI: 4.87-16.64, P = .0003) indicated that mirabegron was effective in treating OAB induced by BPH in men receiving tamsulosin therapy. Safety assessments that included treatment-emergent adverse events (odds ratio = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.68-1.13, P = .31) indicated that mirabegron was well tolerated with the exception of post-void residual urine volume (MD = 12.02, 95% CI: 6.01-18.04, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that mirabegron is an effective and safe treatment for OAB symptoms induced by BPH in men receiving tamsulosin therapy with a low occurrence of side effects. Besides, we should be aware that the administration of mirabegron might have the risk of increasing post-void residual urine volume.

The Analysis of the Effects of Executive Functions, Working Memory and Other Factors on Medication Adherence in Elderly Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Overactive Bladder Symptoms

AIM

Evaluation of the executive function and working memory influence, as well as the general state of memory, on adherence to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and overactive bladder symptoms treatment in elderly men.

BACKGROUND

The influence of the executive function and working memory on treatment adherence in older men with BPH has not been studied enough.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the level of influence of various factors on the treatment adherence in older men with BPH.

METHODS

The executive function and working memory evaluation, as well as a general memory assessment, were carried out using the Wisconsin Test, the Wechsler Memory Scale, and the California Verbal Test. Hierarchical and simultaneous regressions were calculated to study the effect of executive function and working memory.

RESULTS

After the end of the study, the symptoms of hyperactive bladder significantly decreased, the symptoms of evacuation did not change significantly, and the cognitive status of the patients remained unchanged. The predictor variables significantly influencing adherence of elderly men to BPH and overactive bladder (OAB) treatment are executive function and working memory composite (β = .33, p < .05), severe symptoms of lower urinary tract (-.34, p < .05), and age (-.27, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The status of executive function and working memory, as well as the age and severity of the pathological symptoms of the lower urinary tract, should be taken into account when predicting the risks of rejecting BPH and OAB treatment in elderly patients.

Cognitive functions and health-related quality of life in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and symptoms of overactive bladder when treated with a combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin in a higher dosage

AIM

To study the cognitive functions and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals taking a combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin in a higher dosage.

METHODS

All patients (n = 262) were assigned to group A (N = 93, tamsulosin 0.4 mg + solifenacin 10 mg per day), group B (N = 83, tamsulosin 0.4 mg + solifenacin 20 mg), and control group C (N = 86; tamsulosin 0.4 mg + placebo). The lower urinary tract (LUT) condition was assessed on the scales International Prostate Symptom Score, Over Active Bladder Awareness Tool and uroflowmetry. The state of cognitive status was assessed on the scales Mini-mental State Examination, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Wechsler III, Color Trails Test, California Verbal Learning Test.

RESULTS

The values of cognitive function indicators in the individuals from all groups after treatment did not significantly differ from the respective values at the baseline (p > .05). The values of most HRQoL parameters of the functional state of the LUT significantly improved in groups A and B. A significant correlation between the state of cognitive status and HRQoL, as well as LUT was absent (r <0.3).

CONCLUSION

The combination of solifenacin in a double dosage along with tamsulosin can be recommended for elderly benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with overactive bladder symptoms.

A multicenter real-life study of the efficacy of an alpha-blocker with or without anticholinergic agent (imidafenacin) treatment in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and storage symptoms

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy comprising a short-acting anticholinergic, imidafenacin and an alpha-blocker compared with monotherapy with an alpha-blocker only in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and storage symptoms.

METHODS

The 12-week, prospective, double-blind, randomised trial enrolled men with LUTS and storage symptom. The inclusion criteria were a total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12, an IPSS question 4 score ≥2, ≥8 micturitions in 24 hours, and a prostate volume >20 mL. The primary outcome was a change in the micturition number from baseline. Bladder diary variables, Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) scores, IPSS and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 260 patients screened, 221 completed the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an alpha-blocker only (n=111, group 1) or combination therapy comprising an alpha-blocker and an anticholinergic (n=110, group 2) for 12 weeks. Group 1 and 2 showed significant improvement in their 24-hour micturition numbers (-1.87 and -2.08, respectively), nocturia episodes (-0.48 and -0.53, respectively), total IPSS (-9.9 and -8.8, respectively), and PPIUS scores (-0.19 and -0.24, respectively). Micturition number per 24 hours, daytime frequency, urgency, the PPIUS score, the IPSS question 4 score and IPSS QoL score improved significantly in the combination therapy group, but changes in total IPSS, nocturia episodes, and safety outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Compared with treatment with an alpha-blocker alone, combination therapy comprising an anticholinergic and an alpha-blocker showed superior efficacy and its safety was similar in patients with LUTS and storage symptoms.

Treatment of Concomitant OAB and BPH

The etiology of men's lower urinary tract storage and voiding symptoms involves a contribution from both detrusor and outlet. As such, treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) ± benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) with standard alpha-adrenergic blockade and 5-alpha reductase inhibitor therapy may leave a population of men with persistent and bothersome urinary storage symptoms. An abundance of adequately powered, randomized, placebo-controlled trials indicate that the use of antimuscarinics and beta-3 adrenergic agonists, either alone or in combination with standard BPE/BPO therapy, leads to improvement in storage symptoms. At the same time, metrics associated with urinary emptying, such as maximum flow rate, post-void residual urinary volume, and incidence of treatment-associated urinary retention, appear to be stable and not significantly impacted by the addition of antimuscarinics.

Combination therapy with tamsulosin and solifenacin for male lower urinary tract symptoms with predominant filling symptoms: a new approach to an old problem

Benign prostatic enlargement is the main cause of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The distinction and quantification of voiding, storage and postmicturition symptoms help clinicians decide on a modern pharmacological therapeutic approach for male LUTS. Muscarinic receptors antagonists are now considered safe therapy in males and a fixed-dose combination of oral controlled absorbed system solifenacin and tamsulosin is advantageous compared to tamsulosin monotherapy in males with predominant storage symptoms when validated instruments such as International Prostatic Score Symptoms (IPSS) or Total Urgency Frequency Score (TUFS) are used. This combination therapy is well tolerated and maintains symptomatic improvement in the long term. Different options of managing male LUTS with predominant storage symptoms include a combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin, antimuscarinics alone - some with flexible dosing, and the beta-3 agonist mirabegron. Tailored pharmacological therapy for the particular patient is not a reality yet, but judicious use of the different alternatives could bring varied new therapeutic solutions for male LUTS including benign prostatic enlargement and benign prostatic obstruction.