Pattern of symptoms and symptomatic treatment in adults and the aged population: a retrospective analysis of advanced cancer patients followed at home

Do Patient Demographics and Performance Status Influence Opioid Dose in Cancer Pain?

Context: There is limited evidence on the role of objective parameters in influencing analgesic use in cancer pain management.Objective: To investigate the significance of objective parameters (age, male/female and performance status) in influencing opioid dose. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional audit of adult inpatients with metastatic cancer at a major cancer centre from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018, who were prescribed slow release opioids for cancer pain on discharge. Main outcome measures were demographics (age, male/female and performance status), oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMEDD) and adjuvant analgesic use. Results: Of the 7,747 eligible records, 215 patient records fulfilled inclusion criteria. Older patients (≥75 years) received half of the median oMEDD dose (30 mg) compared to their youngest counterparts (60 mg oMEDD in age ≤50 years) (P = .003). No significant differences were observed between oMEDD and male/female and performance status. Conclusion: Older patients are prescribed half the opioid dose compared to their younger counterparts. This highlights the importance of vigilance in opioid prescribing in the elderly in order to balance side effects with under treatment. Although no other significant relationships were observed, future studies comparing objective patient parameters with opioid prescription may uncover other at risk populations.

Factors affecting medication beliefs among patients newly prescribed oral oncolytic agents

BACKGROUND

Prescribing oral oncolytic agents (OAs) for advanced cancers is increasing.

AIMS

To explore changes in medication beliefs and the effects of symptom severity, cognitive effectiveness and depressive symptoms on medication beliefs over 12 weeks.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, testing an intervention to promote symptom management and adherence [N = 230]. Questionnaires evaluated medication beliefs, symptom severity, depressive symptoms, and cognitive effectiveness. Linear mixed effects models were used for analyses.

RESULTS

OA Necessity beliefs increased over time (mean difference 0.0112, SE = 0.055, p 0.04). Concern beliefs did not change and were lower for advanced cancers (-0.193, SE = 0.067, p < 0.01).Depressive symptoms were related to decreased Necessity beliefs (-0.012, SE = 0.005, p = 0.02), but not Concern beliefs. Medication beliefs were not associated with symptom severity or cognitive effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced cancer hold different medication beliefs compared to earlier staged cancers, lending insight into potential outcomes beyond adherence.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cancer pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to appraise the most recent evidence for the use of NSAIDS in cancer pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Cochrane review reveals the paucity of high-quality evidence for the use of NSAIDS for cancer pain, highlighting methodological considerations for future research. There is limited evidence for the role of combined NSAIDs (celecoxib and diclofenac) alongside opioids for cancer pain. Recent retrospective data suggests NSAIDS may contribute to better pain control in hospitalized patients. In elderly patients in the last weeks of life, retrospective data shows a reduction in NSAID prescribing, without significant implications for pain relief. A recent systematic review looking at the increased risk of anastomotic leaks versus the survival benefits in cancer patients prescribed NSAIDs post oncological surgery was inconclusive. Considering the prescription of PPIs for gastroprotection, studies in the general population suggest potential risks of long-term use, including renal dysfunction and greater risk of fractures. Although current evidence for the anticancer properties of NSAIDS is based on retrospective cohort studies, there may be a role for aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs in reducing the risk of cancer.

SUMMARY

Given the lack of quality evidence, NSAIDS should be prescribed on a case by case basis in discussion with the patient, with regular review of efficacy, whilst balancing the ongoing benefits and risks of continued use, taking into account the patient's likely prognosis.

Age differences in the last week of life in advanced cancer patients followed at home

A retrospective analysis of a consecutive sample of patients admitted to a home care program was performed. Data were recorded in the last week through a backward analysis from the day before death as follows: 1 week before dying (-1W), 3 days before death (-3D), and the day before dying (-1D). Data to be collected included the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), background pain intensity, the prevalence of breakthrough pain, the use of opioids in the last week, and the need for palliative sedation, with indications, duration, and drugs used. Patients were distributed according to the following age ranges: adults (<65 years, A) and aged (≥65 years, O). Of the latter group, three subgroups were assessed: old (65-74 years, O1), very old (75-84 years, O2), and the oldest (≥85 years, O3). Four hundred eleven patients were assessed. At -W1, no statistical differences in intensity of ESAS items ≥4 among the age subgroups were found. For ESAS values at -1W, -3D, and -1D, no statistical differences were found unless for anorexia at -1W (p = 0.000) (more likely), depression at -3D (p = 0.000) (less likely), depression (p = 0.000), and dyspnea (p = 0.01) (less likely) at -1D in the oldest group (O3). No differences in pain intensity among the groups were found (p = 0.54). Opioid doses increased in time and were significantly lower in older patients (p = 0.000). The subcutaneous route was more frequently used at -3D and -1D in older patients. No differences in opioid switching were found among the groups (p = 0.56). Adult patients required more often palliative sedation (p = 0.003). Older patients have problems relatively similar to adult patients in the last week of life, unless for some symptoms. Older patients had also a lower opioid consumption, a more frequent use of the subcutaneous route, and a lower need for palliative sedation.