Efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in patients with acute lumbago: a comparison with intramuscular and oral piroxicam

[Control of pain in the early post-traumatic period in the outpatient practice. Results of the multi-center observational study RAPTOR (Rational Analgesia PostTraumatic: an Observational Research)]

AIM

Evaluate the frequency, nature and course of PTP, as well as the effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs in PTP in real clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The assessment of the condition and need for NSAIDs (original meloxicam) in 1115 outpatient patients who suffered a fracture of the radius (32.2%), injury to the knee (35.2%) or ligaments of the ankle (32.6%); women/men 51.5 and 48.5%, average age 46.915.5 years. We evaluated the dynamics of pain intensity (on a numerical rating scale NRS 010) at rest and during movement, the preservation of moderate and severe pain, as well as the development of adverse drugs reactions (ADR) to NSAIDs 48 weeks after injury.

RESULTS

The average intensity of pain during movement decreased from 7.031.66 to 2.211.38 (p0.001), at rest from 4.462.07 to 0.710.989 (p0.001). The number of people with pain severity 4 in the NRS in 48 weeks after the radius fracture, injury of the knee and ligaments of ankle was 21.0, 16.9 and 11.9%, with moderate or severe impairment of the injured limb 40.4, 26.2 and 16.3%, respectively. The need for taking NSAIDs up to 7 days was noted in 43.3%, 714 days-in 41.8%, more than 2 weeks or constantly in 14.9% of patients. Weak or moderate ADR were observed in 20.8% of patients, mainly dyspepsia and hypertension. Discontinuation of NSAIDs due to ADR was required in only 2.6% of patients. Pain retention 4 in NRS was associated with initially expressed pain (7 in NRS) OR 2.75 (95% CI 0.834.13; p0.001) and the presence of osteoarthritis of knee and/or hip OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.032.34; p=0.039).

CONCLUSION

PTP decreases rapidly in most patients after a radius fracture, injury of the knee, and ankle ligament injury while taking the original meloxicam. However, in a significant part of patients, moderate or severe PTP persists after 48 weeks, which requires prolonged analgesic therapy and active rehabilitation.

Factors influencing the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain. The results of the multicenter observational «CARAMBOL» (Clinical Analysis of Results of Analgesia by Meloxicam and its Safety in Acute Lumbodynia) study

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a main tool to treat acute nonspecific low back pain (NLBP). However, no factors that influence the efficacy of these drugs have been identified to the present day.

Objective: to evaluate the therapeutic effect of and tolerance to NSAIDs (meloxicam) in treating acute NLBS and to identify the factors influencing the efficacy of this drug.

Patients and methods. A study group consisted of 2078 patients (mean age 46.3±13.4 years; women 56.6%) with acute NLBS who had been treated in real clinical practice. The level of pain was estimated using a 0–10 point numerical rating scale (NRS). Initially, the pain level averaged 6.69±1.65 scores; 57.0% of patients were noted to have severe pain (≥7 NRS scores). Pain at rest persisted in 32.0% of patients; that at night was in 19.0%; sensation of stiffness in 60.7%, irradiation to the leg in 28.2%, and lumbar ischialgia in 9.6%. 70.2% of patients had been previously treated with NSAIDs for NLBS, while only 28.0% rated their efficacy as good. All the patients were prescribed meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day for a period of up to 2 weeks. 86.1% of the patients received meloxicam intramuscular for 2 days, then orally; 13.9% took the drug only orally. 52.3% of the patients also used muscle relaxants; 17.4% received oral or intramuscular B vitamins. The study estimated the rate of complete pain relief when NSAIDs were used for up to 2 weeks.

Results and discussion. Complete pain relief was achieved in 75.2% of patients. 83.7% of patients rated the effect of treatment as good or excellent. Undesired drug reactions were recorded in 4.6% of patients. Female gender had no effect on treatment outcome (odds ratio (OR)=0.967; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.795–1.177; p=0.763). Age over 65 years, the first NLBS episode, and a good NSAID effect in a history were associated with the best treatment result: OR=2.053 (95% CI, 1.5920–2.642), p<0.001; 1.415 (1.09–1.836), p=0.009; and 1.937 (1.513–2.481), p<0.001, respectively. Severe pain (≥7 NRS scores), persistent pain at rest and at night, and especially lumbar ischialgia indicated the worst result: OR=0.481 (95% CI, 0.393–0.588), p<0.001; 0.559 (0.441–0.709), p<0.001; 0.511 (0.413–0.631), p<0.001; and 0.346 (0.256–0.466), p<0.001, respectively. NSAIDs in combination with muscle relaxants and B vitamins versus NSAID monotherapy did not increase the likelihood of pain relief: OR=0.827 (95% CI, 0.594–0.889), p=0.02 and 0.917 (0.804–1.1201), p=0.452, respectively.

Conclusion. Meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day is an effective and safe drug to treat acute NLBS. Patient gender has no effect on treatment outcome. Age over 65 years, the first NLBS episode, and a good response to NSAIDs in a history are associated with the best treatment results; and severe pain, persistent pain at rest and at night, irradiation to the leg, and lumbar ischialgia are related to the worst result. NSAIDs in combination with muscle relaxants and B vitamins did not improve treatment outcomes. 

Myofascial pain syndrome: a treatment review

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is defined as pain that originates from myofascial trigger points in skeletal muscle. It is prevalent in regional musculoskeletal pain syndromes, either alone or in combination with other pain generators. The appropriate evaluation and management of myofascial pain is an important part of musculoskeletal rehabilitation, and regional axial and limb pain syndromes. This article reviews the current hypotheses regarding the treatment modalities for myofascial trigger points and muscle pain. Through a critical evidence-based review of the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, the authors aim to provide clinicians with a more comprehensive knowledge of the interventions for myofascial pain.

Meloxicam: a reappraisal of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety

The discovery of two distinct isoenzymes of COX has led to the development and clinical introduction of COX-2 inhibitors with increased selectivity onto the market. Meloxicam is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the oxicam class, and is a preferential inhibitor of COX-2, demonstrating effectiveness with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activity. Meloxicam is therapeutically utilised in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Trials have examined the risk of gastrointestinal ulceration of meloxicam when compared with traditional non-specific COX-inhibiting NSAIDs with mixed results; meloxicam seems to have a greater gastrointestinal risk than the highly specific COX-2 NSAIDs. Meloxicam has a plasma half-life of approximately 20 h and is convenient for once daily administration. Neither moderate renal nor hepatic insufficiency significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in short-term studies. Furthermore, dose adjustment is not required in the elderly. Recent drug-drug interaction studies have demonstrated that meloxicam interacts with some medications, including cholestyramine, lithium and some inhibitors of cytochrome P450 -2C9 and -3A4. Consequently, increased clinical vigilance should be maintained when coprescribing some medications with meloxicam. Concentration-dependent therapeutic and toxicological effects have yet to be extensively elucidated for meloxicam. Long-term safety in various organ systems, especially in the heart and vascular system and with concomitant drug administration, remains to be proven. The pharmacokinetics of meloxicam enables once daily application, which increases compliance compared with some shorter acting NSAIDs; however, long-term clinical data clearly demonstrating safety and efficacy advantages are lacking.

A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib, diclofenac sodium, and meloxicam in patients with acute gouty arthritis

BACKGROUND

Acute attacks of gouty arthritis are characterized by the rapid onset of severe pain, swelling, and erythema of the affected joint. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered the drugs of first choice for treating acute gout. Rofecoxib is a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, which has demonstrated analgesic efficacy in the setting of acute pain. Whether it is effective in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis remains to be evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib compared with diclofenac sodium sustained release (SR) and meloxicam in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis.

METHODS

In this single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group study, patients aged > or =18 years with acute gout within 48 hours of onset were randomized to receive oral treatment with 2 tablets of rofecoxib (25 mg), diclofenac (75 mg), or meloxicam (7.5 mg) once daily for 7 days. The primary outcome measures were patients global assessment of response to therapy and investigator assessment of response to therapy on days 3 and 8. Other efficacy measurements included investigator assessment of total inflammatory scores on days 3 and 8 and patient assessment of pain intensity during the first 12 hours of treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (53 men, 9 women; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [12.1] years) were assigned to receive rofexocib (n = 20), diclofenac (n = 21), or meloxicam (n = 21). For patient global response to therapy on days 3 and 8, rofecoxib was associated with analgesic efficacy in significantly more patients compared with meloxicam (84.2% vs 40.0% of patients [ P=0.005] and 94.7% vs 60.0% of patients [ P=0.02], respectively); no significant differences versus diclofenac were found. Similarly, for investigator global assessment of response to therapy, a greater percentage of responders was found in the rofecoxib group compared with the meloxicam group on day 3 (88.9% vs 40.0% of patients [ P=0.02 ]), but the difference was not significant on day 8. A greater percentage of responders was found in the rofecoxib group compared with the diclofenac group on day 3 (88.9% vs 47.3% [ P=0.007 ]), but the difference was not significant on day 8. Compared with baseline, all regimens showed significant improvement in total inflammatory scores on days 3 and 8 (all P<0.01 ). During the first 12 hours after dosing, pain intensity score was significantly reduced with rofecoxib starting at 0.5 hours ( P<0.05 ), but not with diclofenac or meloxicam. Clinical adverse events (AEs) were reported in 4 (20.0%), 7 (33.3%), and 6 (28.6%) patients in the rofecoxib, diclofenac, and meloxicam groups, respectively; the most common AEs reported were edema in 1 patient each in the rofecoxib (5.0%) and meloxicam (4.8%) groups and 2 patients (9.5%) in the diclofenac group and abdominal (1 [5.0%], 1 [4.8%], and 2 [9.5%], respectively). No significant differences in tolerability were found among the 3 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with acute gouty arthritis, rofecoxib 50 mg once daily provided more effective treatment than diclofenac sodium SR 150 mg and meloxicam 15 mg administered orally once daily for 7 days in > or = 1 efficacy assessment of overall analgesic effect on day 3 or day 8. Rofecoxib achieved a rapid onset of pain relief, demonstrating significant improvement 30 minutes after dosing. All of the regimens appeared well tolerated in the population studied.

Evaluation of meloxicam (A cox-2 inhibitor) for management of postoperative endodontic pain: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

Successful management of endodontic pain represents a continuing challenge. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was to compare the pain reducing effect of oral preparations of meloxicam, piroxicam, and placebo in endodontic emergency patients. A total of 51 patients who presented to the Tehran University endodontic clinic and one private dental clinic were invited to participate. Patients were asked to evaluate their pretreatment pain with a visual-analog scale. After root canal therapy they were randomly assigned to one of three groups: meloxicam, piroxicam, or placebo. Each patient was sent home with a visual-analog scale to fill out at 8 and 24 h after completion of therapy. The results of this study showed no significant differences between efficacy of meloxicam, piroxicam, and placebo, but a significant effect of the time factor in reducing postoperative pain in all treatment groups was observed.

Meloxicam and selective COX-2 inhibitors in the management of pain in the palliative care population

This paper discusses the treatment of pain in the palliative care patient, specifically the use of meloxicam and recent advances in agents with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selectivity. Meloxicam is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that preferentially inhibits COX-2 more than cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), especially at low doses, thereby offering advantages over traditional nonselective NSAIDs. New COX-2 selective agents are discussed, including valdecoxib, parecoxib, etoricoxib, and COX-189.

Meloxicam

Meloxicam (Mobic trade mark, Boehringer Ingelheim) is a relatively new oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) approved for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the US. It has also been evaluated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and acute 'rheumatic' pain. Meloxicam has been shown to be COX-2 preferential, particularly at its lowest therapeutic dose, and is anti-inflammatory by inhibiting prostanoid synthesis in inflammatory cells. Since it is COX-2 preferential, it would be expected to have less gastrointestinal toxicity than non-selective NSAIDs. In clinical trials of meloxicam in osteoarthritis, it was found to be as effective as piroxicam, diclofenac and naproxen with less clinical gastrointestinal symptoms and less perforations, obstructions and bleeds by meta-analysis. Adverse events, including peripheral oedema and hypertension, occurred at a similar rate as with traditional NSAIDs.

Meloxicam

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary® Monograph Service receive five to six researched monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. The monographs are published in printed form and on diskettes that allow customization. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board called The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X). All topics pertinent to clinical pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The July 2000 Formulary monographs are linezolid, insulin glargine, rivastigmine, pemirolast, and tacrolimus ointment. The DUE is on linezolid.

Gastrointestinal safety profile of meloxicam: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

This article provides a systematic review of the frequency and severity of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) events among patients using meloxicam, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). A MEDLINE search of English language articles from 1990-1998, a manual search of citations from primary trials and review articles, and a manual search of proceedings from international gastroenterology meetings were conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing the frequency of GI adverse events for meloxicam versus non-COX-2-selective NSAIDs were selected. Specific data about the frequency of dyspepsia; perforations, ulcers, and bleeds (PUBs); and withdrawal of medication because of adverse GI events was also extracted. From a pool of 62 potentially relevant citations, 12 randomized trials were identified. All trials concerning symptomatic GI adverse events used the World Health Organization's Adverse Reaction Terminology List (WHO-ARTL) to code adverse events. Patients using meloxicam had fewer GI adverse events compared with non-COX-2-selective NSAIDs (odds ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.69). Patients using meloxicam experienced less dyspepsia (odds ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84), fewer PUBs (odds ratio = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.96), and less frequent discontinuation of NSAID because of adverse GI events (odds ratio = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67) compared with non-COX-2 selective NSAIDs. Meloxicam, a COX-2-selective NSAID, appears to cause fewer adverse GI events than standard, non-COX-2-selective NSAIDs. However, the generalizability of these data may be limited by the low dose of meloxicam used in most trials and the use of the WHO-ARTL to code adverse events.

The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: safety and effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

To review the development of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and discuss specific agents that are currently under investigation or have been marketed.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature on selective COX inhibitors was identified from a comprehensive MEDLINE, English-literature search from January 1966 through September 1998, with additional studies selected by review of the references. Abstracts from recent meetings and package insert literature from approved agents were also used as source material. Indexing terms included COX-2 inhibitors, meloxicam, celecoxib, rofecoxib, flosulide, SC-58635, and MK-966.

STUDY SELECTION

Human clinical, pharmacokinetic, and dose-ranging trials performed in Europe and the US and randomized comparative trials were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

With the discovery of at least two COX isoforms, a better understanding of the mechanism of action and gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been realized. While COX-1 is involved in physiologic maintenance, COX-2 seems to be involved in inflammation, mitogenesis, and specialized signal transductions. Selective COX-2 inhibitors may allow maximum antiinflammatory activity while improving the safety profile associated with NSAID therapy. Celecoxib and rofecoxib have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of osteo- and rheumatoid arthritis; meloxicam is undergoing Phase III clinical trials. Preliminary data indicate that the selective COX-2 inhibitors provide analgesic and antiinflammatory efficacy comparable with older NSAIDs, with fewer adverse gastrointestinal effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific COX-2 inhibitors offer promising benefits over older NSAIDs with regard to gastrointestinal safety while maintaining analgesic and antiinflammatory efficacy. Further study is required to determine long-term efficacy and safety in clinical use.

Pain management in cardiothoracic practice

All analgesia regimens have benefits and side effects, and personal expertise can greatly influence the efficacy of regional techniques. A multimodal approach to analgesic management allows physicians to achieve maximum analgesic efficacy while limiting side effects. An appropriate analgesic plan takes into account the extent of pain associated with the type of incision and adjusts this according to each patient's individual needs. As we enter the new millennium, thoracic and cardiac surgery is becoming more innovative, and the life expectancy of people in the first world is constantly increasing. Older people with less physiologic reserve and more multisystem dysfunction are undergoing more major surgical procedures, and adequate pain control in the postoperative period is becoming increasingly important.