Clinical relevance of esophageal and gastric pH measurements in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Regurgitation in healthy and non healthy infants

Uncomplicate regurgitation in otherwise healthy infants is not a disease. It consists of milk flow from mouth during or after feeding. Common causes include overfeeding, air swallowed during feeding, crying or coughing; physical exam is normal and weight gain is adequate. History and physical exam are diagnostic, and conservative therapy is recommended. Pathologic gastroesophageal reflux or gastroesophageal reflux disease refers to infants with regurgitation and vomiting associated with poor weight gain, respiratory symptoms, esophagitis. Reflux episodes occur most often during transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter unaccompanied by swallowing, which permit gastric content to flow into the esophagus. A minor proportion of reflux episodes occurs when the lower esophageal sphincter fails to increase pressure during a sudden increase in intraabdominal pressure or when lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure is chronically reduced. Alterations in several protective mechanisms allow physiologic reflux to become gastroesophageal reflux disease; diagnostic approach is both clinical and instrumental: radiological series are useful to exclude anatomic abnormalities; pH-testing evaluates the quantity, frequency and duration of the acid reflux episodes; endoscopy and biopsy are performed in the case of esophagitis. Therapy with H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors are suggested.

[The value of twenty-four hour intraoesophageal pH monitoring and manometry in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms]

Functional gastroenterological examinations (intraoesophageal pH monitoring, oesophageal manometry, scintigraphy, impedance examination) play important role in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal complaints.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four different cases are demonstrated where diagnose and therapy was developed by these examinations. Two patients had typical gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms and two others had dysphagia. Intraoesophageal pH monitoring was performed by Zinetics twenty-four hour one or two channel pH catheters and oesophageal manometry was carried out by Zinetics EMC four channel catheter with water perfusion method.

CASE REPORTS

In one of the patients with typical and extraoesophageal reflux symptoms, lower oesophageal sphincter incompetency by manometry and pathological acid reflux was observed by intraoesophageal pH monitoring, respectively. Furthermore, hiatal hernia was established, peristalsis of the oesophagus proved to be preserved. Because of incomplete efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, antireflux surgery was indicated. An other patient with reflux symptoms had physiological pH monitoring and manometric values. Hypersensitive oesophagus was diagnosed and PPI therapy in double dose was applied. Both patients are symptom free up to now. Other two patients complained difficult swallowing and weight loss. Absence of lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation and hypomotility of the oesophagus was observed. After oesophageal dilatation, both patients with achalasia could easy swallow and eat.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases confirm the importance of the twenty-four hour intraoesophageal pH monitoring and oesophageal manometry in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, non-cardiac chest pain, other extraoesophageal manifestations and dysphagia. These examinations support the decision for the adequate therapeutic strategy (conventional treatment, surgery or operation or endoscopic intervention) and are important in the follow-up of patients.

Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Ameliorates Symptoms of Reflux, Especially for Patients with Very Abnormal DeMeester Scores

Intuitively, more severe acid reflux causes more severe symptoms. This study was undertaken to correlate preoperative DeMeester scores with symptoms before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Before fundoplication, all patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent 24 to 48 hour pH testing. Before and after fundoplication, the frequency and severity of reflux symptoms were scored using a Likert scale. Four hundred and eighty-one patients underwent fundoplication and were followed for a mean of 32 months. The preoperative median DeMeester score was 41 (range 14.8 to 361.5). Before fundoplication, DeMeester scores correlated with severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (Spearman regression analysis, P < 0.05 for all). Postoperatively, all symptom scores improved (Wilcoxon matched pairs test, P < 0.05 for all). After fundoplication, preoperative DeMeester scores did not correlate with the frequency or severity of symptoms. For patients with excessive acid reflux, reflux severity impacts the frequency and severity of symptoms before fundoplication. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication improves the frequency and severity of all reflux symptoms. The severity of preoperative reflux does not impact the frequency or severity of symptoms after fundoplication. Relief of excessive acid reflux, regardless of severity or degree ( i.e., DeMeester scores), ameliorates symptoms of acid reflux thereby encouraging fundoplication, especially for patients with very abnormal DeMeester scores.

Efficacy of pantoprazole 20 mg daily compared with esomeprazole 20 mg daily in the maintenance of healed gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, double-blind comparative trial - the EMANCIPATE study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole 20 mg once daily with that of esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 6 months as maintenance therapy in patients with previously healed gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

In an initial open-label acute phase, outpatients with endoscopically confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease (Los Angeles grades A-D) received pantoprazole 40 mg once daily for 4 or 8 weeks. Those healed (defined as the absence of esophagitis, and 'no' or 'mild' heartburn and acid regurgitation) were randomized in the double-blind manner for maintenance therapy with pantoprazole 20 mg once daily or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 6 months.

RESULTS

In the acute healing phase, 1452 patients were recruited to receive pantoprazole 40 mg once daily. Healing success was 91% (intent-to-treat analysis). A total of 1303 patients entered the maintenance phase of the study. Pantoprazole 20 mg once daily and esomeprazole 20 mg once daily were equally effective at maintaining patients in remission; 84 and 85% of pantoprazole and esomeprazole recipients remained in combined endoscopic and symptomatic remission at 6 months (intent-to-treat analysis). The confidence interval of the difference was (-5.7; +infinity), showing that pantoprazole is as effective as esomeprazole with a noninferiority margin of 5.8%. Combined endoscopic and symptomatic remission was independent of Helicobacter pylori status. Both treatments were well tolerated and safe.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg once daily or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily provides similarly effective and well-tolerated maintenance of previously healed gastroesophageal reflux disease irrespective of baseline H. pylori status.