A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions

Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs

BACKGROUND

Multi-population genomic prediction can rapidly expand the size of the reference population and improve genomic prediction ability. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown advantages in single-population genomic prediction of phenotypes. However, few studies have explored the effectiveness of ML methods for multi-population genomic prediction.

RESULTS

In this study, 3720 Yorkshire pigs from Austria and four breeding farms in China were used, and single-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ST-GBLUP), multitrait GBLUP (MT-GBLUP), Bayesian Horseshoe (BayesHE), and three ML methods (support vector regression (SVR), kernel ridge regression (KRR) and AdaBoost.R2) were compared to explore the optimal method for joint genomic prediction of phenotypes of Chinese and Austrian pigs through 10 replicates of fivefold cross-validation. In this study, we tested the performance of different methods in two scenarios: (i) including only one Austrian population and one Chinese pig population that were genetically linked based on principal component analysis (PCA) (designated as the "two-population scenario") and (ii) adding reference populations that are unrelated based on PCA to the above two populations (designated as the "multi-population scenario"). Our results show that, the use of MT-GBLUP in the two-population scenario resulted in an improvement of 7.1% in predictive ability compared to ST-GBLUP, while the use of SVR and KKR yielded improvements in predictive ability of 4.5 and 5.3%, respectively, compared to MT-GBLUP. SVR and KRR also yielded lower mean square errors (MSE) in most population and trait combinations. In the multi-population scenario, improvements in predictive ability of 29.7, 24.4 and 11.1% were obtained compared to ST-GBLUP when using, respectively, SVR, KRR, and AdaBoost.R2. However, compared to MT-GBLUP, the potential of ML methods to improve predictive ability was not demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that ML algorithms can achieve better prediction performance than multitrait GBLUP models in multi-population genomic prediction of phenotypes when the populations have similar genetic backgrounds; however, when reference populations that are unrelated based on PCA are added, the ML methods did not show a benefit. When the number of populations increased, only MT-GBLUP improved predictive ability in both validation populations, while the other methods showed improvement in only one population.

Improving multi-population genomic prediction accuracy using multi-trait GBLUP models which incorporate global or local genetic correlation information

In the application of genomic prediction, a situation often faced is that there are multiple populations in which genomic prediction (GP) need to be conducted. A common way to handle the multi-population GP is simply to combine the multiple populations into a single population. However, since these populations may be subject to different environments, there may exist genotype-environment interactions which may affect the accuracy of genomic prediction. In this study, we demonstrated that multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (MTGBLUP) can be used for multi-population genomic prediction, whereby the performances of a trait in different populations are regarded as different traits, and thus multi-population prediction is regarded as multi-trait prediction by employing the between-population genetic correlation. Using real datasets, we proved that MTGBLUP outperformed the conventional multi-population model that simply combines different populations together. We further proposed that MTGBLUP can be improved by partitioning the global between-population genetic correlation into local genetic correlations (LGC). We suggested two LGC models, LGC-model-1 and LGC-model-2, which partition the genome into regions with and without significant LGC (LGC-model-1) or regions with and without strong LGC (LGC-model-2). In analysis of real datasets, we demonstrated that the LGC models could increase universally the prediction accuracy and the relative improvement over MTGBLUP reached up to 163.86% (25.64% on average).

Accuracy of genomic prediction using multiple Atlantic salmon populations

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of genomic prediction is partly determined by the size of the reference population. In Atlantic salmon breeding programs, four parallel populations often exist, thus offering the opportunity to increase the size of the reference set by combining these populations. By allowing a reduction in the number of records per population, multi-population prediction can potentially reduce cost and welfare issues related to the recording of traits, particularly for diseases. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of multi- and across-population prediction of breeding values for resistance to amoebic gill disease (AGD) using all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on a 55K chip or a selected subset of SNPs based on the signs of allele substitution effect estimates across populations, using both linear and nonlinear genomic prediction (GP) models in Atlantic salmon populations. In addition, we investigated genetic distance, genetic correlation estimated based on genomic relationships, and persistency of linkage disequilibrium (LD) phase across these populations.

RESULTS

The genetic distance between populations ranged from 0.03 to 0.07, while the genetic correlation ranged from 0.19 to 0.99. Nonetheless, compared to within-population prediction, there was limited or no impact of combining populations for multi-population prediction across the various models used or when using the selected subset of SNPs. The estimates of across-population prediction accuracy were low and to some extent proportional to the genetic correlation estimates. The persistency of LD phase between adjacent markers across populations using all SNP data ranged from 0.51 to 0.65, indicating that LD is poorly conserved across the studied populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that a high genetic correlation and a high genetic relationship between populations do not guarantee a higher prediction accuracy from multi-population genomic prediction in Atlantic salmon.

Genomic prediction based on a joint reference population for the Xinjiang Brown cattle

Introduction: Xinjiang Brown cattle constitute the largest breed of cattle in Xinjiang. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a genomic evaluation system, especially for those with low levels of breed improvement. Methods: This study aimed to establish a cross breed joint reference population by analyzing the genetic structure of 485 Xinjiang Brown cattle and 2,633 Chinese Holstein cattle (Illumina GeneSeek GGP bovine 150 K chip). The Bayes method single-step genome-wide best linear unbiased prediction was used to conduct a genomic evaluation of the joint reference population for the milk traits of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The reference population of Chinese Holstein cattle was randomly divided into groups to construct the joint reference population. By comparing the prediction accuracy, estimation bias, and inflation coefficient of the validation population, the optimal number of joint reference populations was determined. Results and Discussion: The results indicated a distinct genetic structure difference between the two breeds of adult cows, and both breeds should be considered when constructing multi-breed joint reference and validation populations. The reliability range of genome prediction of milk traits in the joint reference population was 0.142-0.465. Initially, it was determined that the inclusion of 600 and 900 Chinese Holstein cattle in the joint reference population positively impacted the genomic prediction of Xinjiang Brown cattle to certain extent. It was feasible to incorporate the Chinese Holstein into Xinjiang Brown cattle population to form a joint reference population for multi-breed genomic evaluation. However, for different Xinjiang Brown cattle populations, a fixed number of Chinese Holstein cattle cannot be directly added during multi-breed genomic selection. Pre-evaluation analysis based on the genetic structure, kinship, and other factors of the current population is required to ensure the authenticity and reliability of genomic predictions and improve estimation accuracy.

Genomic Prediction of Growth Traits in Yorkshire Pigs of Different Reference Group Sizes Using Different Estimated Breeding Value Models

The need for sufficient reference population data poses a significant challenge in breeding programs aimed at improving pig farming on a small to medium scale. To overcome this hurdle, investigating the advantages of combing reference populations of varying sizes is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). Genomic selection (GS) in populations with limited reference data can be optimized by combining populations of the same breed or related breeds. This study focused on understanding the effect of combing different reference group sizes on the accuracy of GS for determining the growth effectiveness and percentage of lean meat in Yorkshire pigs. Specifically, our study investigated two important traits: the age at 100 kg live weight (AGE100) and the backfat thickness at 100 kg live weight (BF100). This research assessed the efficiency of genomic prediction (GP) using different GEBV models across three Yorkshire populations with varying genetic backgrounds. The GeneSeek 50K GGP porcine high-density array was used for genotyping. A total of 2295 Yorkshire pigs were included, representing three Yorkshire pig populations with different genetic backgrounds-295 from Danish (small) lines from Huaibei City, Anhui Province, 500 from Canadian (medium) lines from Lixin County, Anhui Province, and 1500 from American (large) lines from Shanghai. To evaluate the impact of different population combination scenarios on the GS accuracy, three approaches were explored: (1) combining all three populations for prediction, (2) combining two populations to predict the third, and (3) predicting each population independently. Five GEBV models, including three Bayesian models (BayesA, BayesB, and BayesC), the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model, and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) were implemented through 20 repetitions of five-fold cross-validation (CV). The results indicate that predicting one target population using the other two populations yielded the highest accuracy, providing a novel approach for improving the genomic selection accuracy in Yorkshire pigs. In this study, it was found that using different populations of the same breed to predict small- and medium-sized herds might be effective in improving the GEBV. This investigation highlights the significance of incorporating population combinations in genetic models for predicting the breeding value, particularly for pig farmers confronted with resource limitations.

Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models

Numerous studies have shown that combining populations from similar or closely related genetic breeds improves the accuracy of genomic predictions (GP). Extensive experimentation with diverse Bayesian and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models have been developed to explore multi-breed genomic selection (GS) in livestock, ultimately establishing them as successful approaches for predicting genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using BayesR and GBLUP models with linkage disequilibrium (LD)-weighted genomic relationship matrices (GRMs) for genomic prediction in three different beef cattle breeds to identify the best approach for enhancing the accuracy of multi-breed genomic selection in beef cattle. Additionally, a comparison was conducted to evaluate the predictive precision of different marker densities and genetic correlations among the three breeds of beef cattle. The GRM between Yunling cattle (YL) and other breeds demonstrated modest affinity and highlighted a notable genetic concordance of 0.87 between Chinese Wagyu (WG) and Huaxi (HX) cattle. In the within-breed GS, BayesR demonstrated an advantage over GBLUP. The prediction accuracies for HX cattle using the BayesR model were 0.52 with BovineHD BeadChip data (HD) and 0.46 with whole-genome sequencing data (WGS). In comparison to the GBLUP model, the accuracy increased by 26.8% for HD data and 9.5% for WGS data. For WG and YL, BayesR doubled the within-breed prediction accuracy to 14.3% from 7.1%, outperforming GBLUP across both HD and WGS datasets. Moreover, analyzing multiple breeds using genomic selection showed that BayesR consistently outperformed GBLUP in terms of predictive accuracy, especially when using WGS. For instance, in a mixed reference population of HX and WG, BayesR achieved a significant accuracy of 0.53 using WGS for HX, which was a substantial enhancement over the accuracies obtained with GBLUP models. The research further highlights the benefit of including various breeds in the reference group, leading to enhanced accuracy in predictions and emphasizing the importance of comprehensive genomic selection methods. Our research findings indicate that BayesR exhibits superior performance compared to GBLUP in multi-breed genomic prediction accuracy, achieving a maximum improvement of 33.3%, especially in genetically diverse breeds. The improvement can be attributed to the effective utilization of higher single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker density by BayesR, resulting in enhanced prediction accuracy. This evidence conclusively demonstrates the significant impact of BayesR on enhancing genomic predictions in diverse cattle populations, underscoring the crucial role of genetic relatedness in selection methodologies. In parallel, subsequent studies should focus on refining GRM and exploring alternative models for GP.

Using genomic selection to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for multi-populations in pigs

The size of the reference group is among the most critical determinants of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) accuracy. However, small- and medium-sized pig farms often need help accumulating adequate reference data, posing significant challenges to breeding programs. To solve this problem, exploring the potential benefits of combining reference groups of different sizes is necessary to improve GEBV accuracy. The primary objective of this investigation was to assess a more effective statistical model for combined multi-populations and its potential to enhance the accuracy of GEBVs for small and medium populations. Three populations were simulated using the QMSim software, each consisting of different sizes (300, 600, and 1 500, respectively). To assess the impact of heritability on the accuracy of GEBVs, four different levels of heritability (0.05, 0.15, 0.35, and 0.5) were simulated. Simultaneously, to investigate the impact of kinship on multi-populations, the study created four distinct scenarios for the three sizes of populations. These scenarios included: (1) the three groups are all independent, (2) the large group and the small group with a familial connection (n = 1 800), a middle group (n = 600) acting independently with no kinship, (3) the large group with a familial connection to the middle group (n = 2 100) but no connection to the small group (n = 300), and (4) the small group with a familial connection to the middle group (n = 900), while the large group (n = 1 500) acted independently with no kinship. This study evaluates and compares the accuracy of predicting breeding values using four different methods, including genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), single-stepGBLUP (ssGBLUP), and two Bayesian models (Bayes A and Bayes B), with varying sizes of reference groups. In each scenario, three different prediction strategies were compared: (1) Merging all three different sizes of populations for predicting, (2) predicting each independent population separately, and (3) the other two populations predict the population. Our findings reveal that combining populations enhances the Bayesian models, with Bayes B yielding the highest accuracy. In independent populations, the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) models demonstrated the highest accuracy. However, in cases where populations were related and the heritability was high, the Bayes B model exhibited the highest overall accuracy (slightly higher than BLUP models) in the independent population. Our results underscore the importance of considering population combinations when using genetic models to predict breeding values, particularly for pig farmers with limited resources.

Genetic parameters of pregnancy loss in dairy cows estimated from pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in milk

This study examined the feasibility of using pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAG) in milk within breeding for pregnancy maintenance and assessed the genetic variation in pregnancy loss traits. A total of 374,206 PAG samples from 41,889 Swedish Red (SR) and 82,187 Swedish Holstein (SH) cows were collected at monthly test-day milkings in 1,119 Swedish herds. Pregnancy status was defined based on PAG levels and confirmed by data on artificial insemination (AI), calving, and culling from d 1 postinsemination to calving. Pregnancy loss traits were defined as embryonic loss (diagnosed 28 d to 41 d after AI), fetal loss (42 d after AI until calving), and total pregnancy loss. Least squares means (± standard error, %) and genetic parameters were estimated using mixed linear models. Heritability was estimated to be 0.02, 0.02, and 0.03 for embryonic loss, fetal loss, and total pregnancy loss, respectively. Cows with pregnancy loss had lower PAG concentrations than cows which successfully maintained pregnancy and calved. PAG recording was limited to monthly test-day milking, resulting in low estimated embryonic loss (17.5 ± 0.4 and 18.7 ± 0.4 in SR and SH, respectively) and higher fetal loss (32.8 ± 0.5 and 35.1 ± 0.5 in SR and SH, respectively). Pregnancy loss might have occurred earlier but remained undetected until the next test-day milking, when it was recorded as fetal loss rather than embryonic loss. Estimated genetic correlation between embryonic and fetal pregnancy loss traits and classical fertility traits were in general high. Identification of novel genetic traits from PAG data can be highly specific, as PAG are only secreted by the placenta. Thus, PAG could be useful indicators in selection to genetically improve pregnancy maintenance and reduce reproductive losses in milk production. Further studies are needed to clarify how these results could be applied in breeding programs concurrent with selection for classical fertility traits.

Effect of subdivision of the Lacaune dairy sheep breed on the accuracy of genomic prediction

Genomic selection was deployed in Lacaune dairy breed in 2015. Lacaune population split in 1972 into 2 breeding companies with associated flocks, and there have been very few exchanges of animals between the subpopulations, leading to divergence of the 2 subpopulations. In spite of that, there is a joint genomic prediction. The objective of this study is to understand how this structuring affects prediction accuracy. We analyzed all the data available from Lacaune breeding program for milk yield: around 6 million phenotypes, 2 million animals in the pedigree and more than 29,000 genotyped animals, including 3,434 and 2,868 AI rams for each company. To consider missing pedigree, we set up genetic groups using the theory of metafounders. First, we studied the pedigree and genomic structures of the 2 subpopulations calculating Fst, evolution of average pedigree relationships across time and principal components analysis of genomic relationships. In a second part, we compared the reliability between different scenarios: an evaluation with a single reference population (Alone), an evaluation with a joint reference population (Together) and an evaluation of one subpopulation based on the reference population of the other group (Indirect). The low Fst value (0.02) reveals that the 2 subpopulations are still genetically close. Nevertheless, a low and constant average relationship between the animals of the 2 subpopulations confirms the absence of recent connections between them. We can see with principal component analysis results that even if they are close, they diverge over time. Finally, we observe small gains in accuracy of Together versus Alone, in spite of whereas doubling the reference population size in Together. These gains vary across years and subpopulations: less than 0.08 (0.46 to 0.54; ratio of accuracy for the partial and whole evaluations-corresponding to the greatest change in this ratio for breeding company 1, observed for the cohort 2016) for one subpopulation and between 0.03 (0.55 to 0.58) and 0.17 (0.48 to 0.65) for the other. To conclude, the 2 subpopulations remain close enough genetically so that their combined evaluation is advantageous, even if only slightly.

Invited review: Good practices in genome-wide association studies to identify candidate sequence variants in dairy cattle

Genotype data from dairy cattle selection programs have greatly facilitated GWAS to identify variants related to economic traits. Results can enhance the accuracy of genomic prediction, analyze more complex models that go beyond additive effects, elucidate the genetic architecture of a trait, and finally, decipher the underlying biology of traits. The entire process, comprising data generation, quality control, statistical analyses, interpretation of association results, and linking results to biology should be designed and executed to minimize the generation of false-positive and false-negative associations and misleading links to biological processes. This review aims to provide general guidelines for data analysis that address data quality control, association tests, adjustment for population stratification, and significance evaluation to improve the reliability of conclusions. We also provide guidance on post-GWAS strategy and the interpretation of results. These guidelines are tailored to dairy cattle, which are characterized by long-range linkage disequilibrium, large half-sib families, and routinely collected phenotypes, requiring different approaches than those applied in human GWAS. We discuss common limitations and challenges that have been overlooked in the analysis and interpretation of GWAS to identify candidate sequence variants in dairy cattle.

Multibreed genomic prediction using summary statistics and a breed-origin-of-alleles approach

Because of an increasing interest in crossbreeding between dairy breeds in dairy cattle herds, farmers are requesting breeding values for crossbred animals. However, genomically enhanced breeding values are difficult to predict in crossbred populations because the genetic make-up of crossbred individuals is unlikely to follow the same pattern as for purebreds. Furthermore, sharing genotype and phenotype information between breed populations are not always possible, which means that genetic merit (GM) for crossbred animals may be predicted without the information needed from some pure breeds, resulting in low prediction accuracy. This simulation study investigated the consequences of using summary statistics from single-breed genomic predictions for some or all pure breeds in two- and three-breed rotational crosses, rather than their raw data. A genomic prediction model taking into account the breed-origin of alleles (BOA) was considered. Because of a high genomic correlation between the breeds simulated (0.62-0.87), the prediction accuracies using the BOA approach were similar to a joint model, assuming homogeneous SNP effects for these breeds. Having a reference population with summary statistics available from all pure breeds and full phenotype and genotype information from crossbreds yielded almost as high prediction accuracies (0.720-0.768) as having a reference population with full information from all pure breeds and crossbreds (0.753-0.789). Lacking information from the pure breeds yielded much lower prediction accuracies (0.590-0.676). Furthermore, including crossbred animals in a combined reference population also benefitted prediction accuracies in the purebred animals, especially for the smallest breed population.

Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction for meat quality traits using whole genome sequence data in pigs

BACKGROUND

Pork quality can directly affect customer purchase tendency and meat quality traits have become valuable in modern pork production. However, genetic improvement has been slow due to high phenotyping costs. In this study, whole genome sequence (WGS) data was used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) for meat quality in large-scale crossbred commercial pigs.

RESULTS

We produced WGS data (18,695,907 SNPs and 2,106,902 INDELs exceed quality control) from 1,469 sequenced Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) pigs and developed a reference panel for meat quality including meat color score, marbling score, L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) of genomic prediction. The prediction accuracy was defined as the Pearson correlation coefficient between adjusted phenotypes and genomic estimated breeding values in the validation population. Using different marker density panels derived from WGS data, accuracy differed substantially among meat quality traits, varied from 0.08 to 0.47. Results showed that MultiBLUP outperform GBLUP and yielded accuracy increases ranging from 17.39% to 75%. We optimized the marker density and found medium- and high-density marker panels are beneficial for the estimation of heritability for meat quality. Moreover, we conducted genotype imputation from 50K chip to WGS level in the same population and found average concordance rate to exceed 95% and r² = 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, estimation of heritability for meat quality traits can benefit from the use of WGS data. This study showed the superiority of using WGS data to genetically improve pork quality in genomic prediction.

Improving Genomic Prediction Accuracy in the Chinese Holstein Population by Combining with the Nordic Holstein Reference Population

The size of the reference population is critical in order to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction. Indeed, improving genomic prediction accuracy by combining multinational reference populations has proven to be effective. In this study, we investigated the improvement of genomic prediction accuracy in seven complex traits (i.e., milk yield; fat yield; protein yield; somatic cell count; body conformation; feet and legs; and mammary system conformation) by combining the Chinese and Nordic Holstein reference populations. The estimated genetic correlations between the Chinese and Nordic Holstein populations are high with respect to protein yield, fat yield, and milk yield-whereby these correlations range from 0.621 to 0.720-and are moderate with respect to somatic cell count (0.449), but low for the three conformation traits (which range from 0.144 to 0.236). When utilizing the joint reference data and a two-trait GBLUP model, the genomic prediction accuracy in the Chinese Holsteins improves considerably with respect to the traits with moderate-to-high genetic correlations, whereas the improvement in Nordic Holsteins is small. When compared with the single population analysis, using the joint reference population for genomic prediction in younger animals, results in a 2.3 to 8.1 percent improvement in accuracy. Meanwhile, 10 replications of five-fold cross-validation were also implemented in order to evaluate the performance of joint genomic prediction, thereby resulting in a 1.6 to 5.2 percent increase in accuracy. With respect to joint genomic prediction, the bias was found to be quite low. However, for traits with low genetic correlations, the joint reference data do not improve the prediction accuracy substantially for either population.

Fitting Genomic Prediction Models with Different Marker Effects among Prefectures to Carcass Traits in Japanese Black Cattle

We fitted statistical models, which assumed single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects differing across the fattened steers marketed into different prefectures, to the records for cold carcass weight (CW) and marbling score (MS) of 1036, 733, and 279 Japanese Black fattened steers marketed into Tottori, Hiroshima, and Hyogo prefectures in Japan, respectively. Genotype data on 33,059 SNPs was used. Five models that assume only common SNP effects to all the steers (model 1), common effects plus SNP effects differing between the steers marketed into Hyogo prefecture and others (model 2), only the SNP effects differing between Hyogo steers and others (model 3), common effects plus SNP effects specific to each prefecture (model 4), and only the effects specific to each prefecture (model 5) were exploited. For both traits, slightly lower values of residual variance than that of model 1 were estimated when fitting all other models. Estimated genetic correlation among the prefectures in models 2 and 4 ranged to 0.53 to 0.71, all <0.8. These results might support that the SNP effects differ among the prefectures to some degree, although we discussed the necessity of careful consideration to interpret the current results.

International single-step SNPBLUP beef cattle evaluations for Limousin weaning weight

Background

Compared to national evaluations, international collaboration projects further improve accuracies of estimated breeding values (EBV) by building larger reference populations or performing a joint evaluation using data (or proxy of them) from different countries. Genomic selection is increasingly adopted in beef cattle, but, to date, the benefits of including genomic information in international evaluations have not been explored. Our objective was to develop an international beef cattle single-step genomic evaluation and investigate its impact on the accuracy and bias of genomic evaluations compared to current pedigree-based evaluations.

Methods

Weaning weight records were available for 331,593 animals from seven European countries. The pedigree included 519,740 animals. After imputation and quality control, 17,607 genotypes at a density of 57,899 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from four countries were available. We implemented two international scenarios where countries were modelled as different correlated traits: an international genomic single-step SNP best linear unbiased prediction (SNPBLUP) evaluation (ssSNPBLUP_INT) and an international pedigree-based BLUP evaluation (PBLUP_INT). Two national scenarios were implemented for pedigree and genomic evaluations using only nationally submitted phenotypes and genotypes. Accuracies, level and dispersion bias of EBV of animals born from 2014 onwards, and increases in population accuracies were estimated using the linear regression method.

Results

On average across countries, 39 and 17% of sires and maternal-grand-sires with recorded (grand-)offspring across two countries were genotyped. ssSNPBLUP_INT showed the highest accuracies of EBV and, compared to PBLUP_INT, led to increases in population accuracy of 13.7% for direct EBV, and 25.8% for maternal EBV, on average across countries. Increases in population accuracies when moving from national scenarios to ssSNPBLUP_INT were observed for all countries. Overall, ssSNPBLUP_INT level and dispersion bias remained similar or slightly reduced compared to PBLUP_INT and national scenarios.

Conclusions

International single-step SNPBLUP evaluations are feasible and lead to higher population accuracies for both large and small countries compared to current international pedigree-based evaluations and national evaluations. These results are likely related to the larger multi-country reference population and the inclusion of phenotypes from relatives recorded in other countries via single-step international evaluations. The proposed international single-step approach can be applied to other traits and breeds.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12711-022-00748-0.

High genetic correlation for milk yield across Manech and Latxa dairy sheep from France and Spain

Spanish Latxa and French Manech are dairy sheep breeds that split into Blond (Latxa Cara Rubia, LCR; Manech Tête Rousse, MTR) and Black (Latxa Cara Negra of Navarre, LCN; Manech Tête Noire, MTN) strains. Exchange of genetic material (artificial insemination doses) is becoming more and more frequent across these breeds, within color, to boost both genomic precision using a larger reference population and genetic progress using a larger selection base. This exchange leads to some rams having descendance across both countries. However, additional gains can only be achieved if the selected traits are genetically similar across countries. The objective of this work was to estimate the genetic correlation across breeds for milk yield. We combine across-country, within-color records, pedigree, and marker information. The number of animals with records oscillates from 65,000 (LCN) to 544,000 (MTR), whereas the number of connecting artificial insemination rams (with more than 10 daughters in the other country) is 381 MTR rams in LCR and 58 MTN rams in LCN. Blond strains had a stronger and more extended-in-time connection. The number of genotyped rams goes from 328 (LCN) to 4,901 (MTR). The relatedness of populations was assessed by principal component analysis and F_st coefficients. The genetic correlation was estimated using 2 (one per color) 2-trait models (each country a trait), including all available data (records, pedigree and genotypes), by maximum profile likelihood while fixing other variance components to within-population estimates. Results showed a closer genetic relationship of Blond strains than of Black strains (F_st: 0.01 vs. 0.05, respectively). Genetic correlation estimates for milk yield were 0.70 in both cases. Based on F_st distances, we expected a lower correlation for Black strains than for Blond ones if dominance or epistasis are important. Thus, we attribute the value of this correlation not being close to 1 mostly to genotype-by-environment interaction, including on-farm management and trait modeling. Regardless, the correlation of 0.7 across populations is encouraging for future joint work of Latxa and Manech breeders, including joint genetic evaluations.

Genomic Prediction Using LD-Based Haplotypes in Combined Pig Populations

The size of reference population is an important factor affecting genomic prediction. Thus, combining different populations in genomic prediction is an attractive way to improve prediction ability. However, combining multireference population roughly cannot increase the prediction accuracy as well as expected in pig. This may be due to different linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern differences between population. In this study, we used the imputed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to construct LD-based haplotypes for genomic prediction in combined population to explore the impact of different single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) densities, variant representation (SNPs or haplotype alleles), and reference population size on the prediction accuracy for reproduction traits. Our results showed that genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) using the WGS data can improve prediction accuracy in multi-population but not within-population. Not only the genomic prediction accuracy of the haplotype method using 80 K chip data in multi-population but also GBLUP for the multi-population (3.4–5.9%) was higher than that within-population (1.2–4.3%). More importantly, we have found that using the haplotype method based on the WGS data in multi-population has better genomic prediction performance, and our results showed that building haploblock in this scenario based on low LD threshold (r² = 0.2–0.3) produced an optimal set of variables for reproduction traits in Yorkshire pig population. Our results suggested that whether the use of the haplotype method based on the chip data or GBLUP (individual SNP method) based on the WGS data were beneficial for genomic prediction in multi-population, while simultaneously combining the haplotype method and WGS data was a better strategy for multi-population genomic evaluation.

Genetic Characterization and Population Connectedness of North American and European Dairy Goats

Genomic prediction of breeding values is routinely performed in several livestock breeding programs around the world, but the size of the training populations and the genetic structure of populations evaluated have, in many instances, limited the increase in the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values. Combining phenotypic, pedigree, and genomic data from genetically related populations can be a feasible strategy to overcome this limitation. However, the success of across-population genetic evaluations depends on the pedigree connectedness and genetic relationship among individuals from different populations. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the genetic connectedness and population structure of Alpine and Saanen dairy goats from four countries involved in the European project SMARTER (SMAll RuminanTs Breeding for Efficiency and Resilience), including Canada, France, Italy, and Switzerland. These analyses are paramount for assessing the potential feasibility of an across-country genomic evaluation in dairy goats. Approximately, 9,855 genotyped individuals (with 51% French genotyped animals) and 6,435,189 animals included in the pedigree files were available across all four populations. The pedigree analyses indicated that the exchange of breeding animals was mainly unilateral with flows from France to the other three countries. Italy has also imported breeding animals from Switzerland. Principal component analyses (PCAs), genetic admixture analysis, and consistency of the gametic phase revealed that French and Italian populations are more genetically related than the other dairy goat population pairs. Canadian dairy goats showed the largest within-breed heterogeneity and genetic differences with the European populations. The genetic diversity and population connectedness between the studied populations indicated that an international genomic evaluation may be more feasible, especially for French and Italian goats. Further studies will investigate the accuracy of genomic breeding values when combining the datasets from these four populations.

Genomic evaluation and genome-wide association studies for total number of teats in a combined American and Danish Yorkshire pig populations selected in China

Joint genomic evaluation by combining data recordings and genomic information from different pig herds and populations is of interest for pig breeding companies because the efficiency of genomic selection (GS) could be further improved. In this work, an efficient strategy of joint genomic evaluation combining data from multiple pig populations is investigated. Total Teat Number (TTN), a trait that is equally recorded on 13 060 American Yorkshire (AY) populations (~14.68 teats) and 10 060 Danish Yorkshire (DY) pigs (~14.29 teats), was used to explore the feasibility and accuracy of GS combining datasets from different populations. We first estimated the genetic correlation (rg) of TTN between AY and DY pig populations (rg=0.79, se=0.23). Then we employed the genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify QTL regions that are significantly associated with TTN and investigate the genetic architecture of TTN in different populations. Our results suggested that the genomic regions controlling TTN are slight different in the two Yorkshire populations, where the candidate QTL regions were on SSC 7 and SSC 8 for AY population and on SSC 7 for DY population. Finally, we explored an optimal way of genomic prediction for TTN via three different Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) models and we concluded that when TTN across populations are regarded as different, but correlated, traits in a multi-trait model, predictive abilities for both Yorkshire populations improve. As a conclusion, joint genomic evaluation for target traits in multiple pig populations is feasible in practice and more accurate, provided a proper model is used.

An Appropriate Genetic Approach for Improving Reproductive Traits in Crossbred Thai-Holstein Cattle under Heat Stress Conditions

Thailand is a tropical country affected by global climate change and has high temperatures and humidity that cause heat stress in livestock. A temperature−humidity index (THI) is required to assess and evaluate heat stress levels in livestock. One of the livestock types in Thailand experiencing heat stress due to extreme climate change is crossbred dairy cattle. Genetic evaluations of heat tolerance in dairy cattle have been carried out for reproductive traits. Heritability values for reproductive traits are generally low (<0.10) because environmental factors heavily influence them. Consequently, genetic improvement for these traits would be slow compared to production traits. Positive and negative genetic correlations were found between reproductive traits and reproductive traits and yield traits. Several selection methods for reproductive traits have been introduced, i.e., the traditional method, marker-assisted selection (MAS), and genomic selection (GS). GS is the most promising technique and provides accurate results with a high genetic gain. Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) has higher accuracy than the multi-step equivalent for fertility traits or low-heritability traits.

GWAS and genomic prediction of milk urea nitrogen in Australian and New Zealand dairy cattle

Background

Urinary nitrogen leakage is an environmental concern in dairy cattle. Selection for reduced urinary nitrogen leakage may be done using indicator traits such as milk urea nitrogen (MUN). The result of a previous study indicated that the genetic correlation between MUN in Australia (AUS) and MUN in New Zealand (NZL) was only low to moderate (between 0.14 and 0.58). In this context, an alternative is to select sequence variants based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with a view to improve genomic prediction accuracies. A GWAS can also be used to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with MUN. Therefore, our objectives were to perform within-country GWAS and a meta-GWAS for MUN using records from up to 33,873 dairy cows and imputed whole-genome sequence data, to compare QTL detected in the GWAS for MUN in AUS and NZL, and to use sequence variants selected from the meta-GWAS to improve the prediction accuracy for MUN based on a joint AUS-NZL reference set.

Results

Using the meta-GWAS, we detected 14 QTL for MUN, located on chromosomes 1, 6, 11, 14, 19, 22, 26 and the X chromosome. The three most significant QTL encompassed the casein genes on chromosome 6, PAEP on chromosome 11 and DGAT1 on chromosome 14. We selected 50,000 sequence variants that had the same direction of effect for MUN in AUS and MUN in NZL and that were most significant in the meta-analysis for the GWAS. The selected sequence variants yielded a genetic correlation between MUN in AUS and MUN in NZL of 0.95 and substantially increased prediction accuracy in both countries.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate how the sharing of data between two countries can increase the power of a GWAS and increase the accuracy of genomic prediction using a multi-country reference population and sequence variants selected based on a meta-GWAS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12711-022-00707-9.

Genomic prediction in Nordic Red dairy cattle considering breed origin of alleles

This study investigated the reliability of genomic prediction (GP) using breed origin of alleles (BOA) approach in the Nordic Red (RDC) population, which has an admixed population structure. The RDC population consists of animals with varying degrees of genetic materials from the Danish Red (RDM), Swedish Red (SRB), Finnish Ayrshire (FAY), and Holstein (HOL) because bulls have been used across the breeds. The BOA approach was tested using 39,550 RDC animals in the reference population and 11,786 in the validation population. Deregressed proofs (DRP) of milk, fat and protein were used as response variable for GP. Direct genomic breeding values (DGV) for animals in the validation population were calculated with (BOA model) or without (joint model) considering breed origin of alleles. The joint model assumed homogeneous marker effects and a single set of marker effects were estimated, whereas BOA model assumed heterogeneous marker effects, and different sets of marker effects were estimated across the breeds. For the BOA approach, we tested scenarios assuming both correlated (BOA_cor) and uncorrelated (BOA_uncor) marker effects between the breeds. Additionally, we investigated GP using a standard Illumina 50K chip and including SNP selected from imputed whole-genome sequencing (50K+WGS). We also studied the effect of estimating (co)variances for genome regions of different sizes to exploit the information of the genome regions contributing to the (co)variance between the breeds. Region sizes were set as 1 SNP, a group of 30 or 100 adjacent SNP, or the whole genome. Reliability of DGV was measured as squared correlations between DGV and DRP divided by the reliability of DRP. Across the 3 traits, in general, RS30 and RS100 SNP yielded the highest reliabilities. Including WGS SNP improved reliabilities in almost all scenarios (0.297 on average for 50K and 0.307 on average for 50K+WGS). The BOA_uncor (0.233 on average) was inferior to the joint model (0.339 on average), but the reliabilities obtained using BOA_cor (0.334 on average) in most cases were not significantly different from those obtained using the joint model. The results indicate that both including additional whole-genome sequencing SNP and dividing the genome into fixed regions improve GP in the RDC. The BOA models have the potential to increase the reliability of GP, but the benefit is limited in populations with a high exchange of genetic material for a long time, as is the case for RDC.

Genetic Diversity in the Italian Holstein Dairy Cattle Based on Pedigree and SNP Data Prior and After Genomic Selection

Genetic diversity has become an urgent matter not only in small local breeds but also in more specialized ones. While the use of genomic data in livestock breeding programs increased genetic gain, there is increasing evidence that this benefit may be counterbalanced by the potential loss of genetic variability. Thus, in this study, we aimed to investigate the genetic diversity in the Italian Holstein dairy cattle using pedigree and genomic data from cows born between 2002 and 2020. We estimated variation in inbreeding, effective population size, and generation interval and compared those aspects prior to and after the introduction of genomic selection in the breed. The dataset contained 84,443 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and 74,485 cows were analyzed. Pedigree depth based on complete generation equivalent was equal to 10.67. A run of homozygosity (ROH) analysis was adopted to estimate SNP-based inbreeding (F_ROH). The average pedigree inbreeding was 0.07, while the average F_ROH was more than double, being equal to 0.17. The pattern of the effective population size based on pedigree and SNP data was similar although different in scale, with a constant decrease within the last five generations. The overall inbreeding rate (ΔF) per year was equal to +0.27% and +0.44% for F_ped and F_ROH throughout the studied period, which corresponded to about +1.35% and +2.2% per generation, respectively. A significant increase in the ΔF was found since the introduction of genomic selection in the breed. This study in the Italian Holstein dairy cattle showed the importance of controlling the loss of genetic diversity to ensure the long-term sustainability of this breed, as well as to guarantee future market demands.

Genomic Selection for Milk Production Traits in Xinjiang Brown Cattle

One-step genomic selection is a method for improving the reliability of the breeding value estimation. This study aimed to compare the reliability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP), single-trait and multitrait models, and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian methods. Data were collected from the production performance records of 2207 Xinjiang Brown cattle in Xinjiang from 1983 to 2018. A cross test was designed to calculate the genetic parameters and reliability of the breeding value of 305 daily milk yield (305 dMY), milk fat yield (MFY), milk protein yield (MPY), and somatic cell score (SCS) of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The heritability of 305 dMY, MFY, MPY, and SCS estimated using the REML and Bayesian multitrait models was approximately 0.39 (0.02), 0.40 (0.03), 0.49 (0.02), and 0.07 (0.02), respectively. The heritability and estimated breeding value (EBV) and the reliability of milk production traits of these cattle calculated based on PBLUP and ssGBLUP using the multitrait model REML and Bayesian methods were higher than those of the single-trait model REML method; the ssGBLUP method was significantly better than the PBLUP method. The reliability of the estimated breeding value can be improved from 0.9% to 3.6%, and the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for the genotyped population can reach 83%. Therefore, the genetic evaluation of the multitrait model is better than that of the single-trait model. Thus, genomic selection can be applied to small population varieties such as Xinjiang Brown cattle, in improving the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value.

Single-step genomic evaluation of Russian dairy cattle using internal and external information

Genomic data are widely used in predicting the breeding values of dairy cattle. The accuracy of genomic prediction depends on the size of the reference population and how related the candidate animals are to it. For populations with limited numbers of progeny‐tested bulls, the reference populations must include cows and data from external populations. The aim of this study was to implement state‐of‐the‐art single‐step genomic evaluations for milk and fat yield in Holstein and Russian Black & White cattle in the Leningrad region (LR, Russia), using only a limited number of genotyped animals. We complemented internal information with external pseudo‐phenotypic and genotypic data of bulls from the neighbouring Danish, Finnish and Swedish Holstein (DFS) population. Three data scenarios were used to perform single‐step GBLUP predictions in the LR dairy cattle population. The first scenario was based on the original LR reference population, which constituted 1,080 genotyped cows and 427 genotyped bulls. In the second scenario, the genotypes of 414 bulls related to the LR from the DFS population were added to the reference population. In the third scenario, LR data were further augmented with pseudo‐phenotypic data from the DFS population. The inclusion of foreign information increased the validation reliability of the milk yield by up to 30%. Suboptimal data recording practices hindered the improvement of fat yield. We confirmed that the single‐step model is suitable for populations with a low number of genotyped animals, especially when external information is integrated into the evaluations. Genomic prediction in populations with a low number of progeny‐tested bulls can be based on data from genotyped cows and on the inclusion of genotypes and pseudo‐phenotypes from the external population. This approach increased the validation reliability of the implemented single‐step model in the milk yield, but shortcomings in the LR data recording scheme prevented improvements in fat yield.

Genomic Prediction of Two Complex Orthopedic Traits Across Multiple Pure and Mixed Breed Dogs

Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) and rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament (RCCL) are two complex inherited orthopedic traits of dogs. These two traits may occur concurrently in the same dog. Genomic prediction of these two diseases would benefit veterinary medicine, the dog’s owner, and dog breeders because of their high prevalence, and because both traits result in painful debilitating osteoarthritis in affected joints. In this study, 842 unique dogs from 6 breeds with hip and stifle phenotypes were genotyped on a customized Illumina high density 183 k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array and also analyzed using an imputed dataset of 20,487,155 SNPs. To implement genomic prediction, two different statistical methods were employed: Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) and a Bayesian method called BayesC. The cross-validation results showed that the two methods gave similar prediction accuracy (r = 0.3–0.4) for CHD (measured as Norberg angle) and RCCL in the multi-breed population. For CHD, the average correlation of the AUC was 0.71 (BayesC) and 0.70 (GBLUP), which is a medium level of prediction accuracy and consistent with Pearson correlation results. For RCCL, the correlation of the AUC was slightly higher. The prediction accuracy of GBLUP from the imputed genotype data was similar to the accuracy from DNA array data. We demonstrated that the genomic prediction of CHD and RCCL with DNA array genotype data is feasible in a multiple breed population if there is a genetic connection, such as breed, between the reference population and the validation population. Albeit these traits have heritability of about one-third, higher accuracy is needed to implement in a natural population and predicting a complex phenotype will require much larger number of dogs within a breed and across breeds. It is possible that with higher accuracy, genomic prediction of these orthopedic traits could be implemented in a clinical setting for early diagnosis and treatment, and the selection of dogs for breeding. These results need continuous improvement in model prediction through ongoing genotyping and data sharing. When genomic prediction indicates that a dog is susceptible to one of these orthopedic traits, it should be accompanied by clinical and radiographic screening at an acceptable age with appropriate follow-up.

Genomic selection in Gir cattle using female reference population

When a sizeable reference population of proven bulls is not available for implementing Genomic selection for a particular trait, and when a recording of certain traits on large scale is difficult, the use of a female reference population is recommended. Gir, one of the important milk purpose cattle breeds of India falls under this category. There is no large scale Progeny Testing (PT) programme in Gir, so proven bulls based on daughter performance in large numbers are not available. Considering the constraints, a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) model was implemented based on recorded cow reference population in Gir breed. Cows (3491) and 23 bulls were genotyped using INDUSCHIP for this purpose. Due to non-availability of pedigreed data, conventional breeding values (BV) of bulls and their reliabilities were not known. For comparison, assumed theoretical reliability of BV of a bull selected based on its dam's yield was compared with reliability obtained for genomic breeding value (GBV) using a GBLUP model. The reliability estimates for GBVs were 4 times higher than that for BVs. The predictive ability of the model was demonstrated by measuring the correlation between corrected phenotypes and GBVs for animals whose records were masked in a five-fold cross-validation study. The correlation was around 0.45 showing reasonable predictability of the GBLUP model. The GBVs were not biased. The regression coefficient between the corrected phenotype and GBV was 1.045. The present study demonstrates that it is feasible to implement genomic selection in Gir cattle in Indian conditions using a female reference population. It is expected that the bulls can be selected with around 4 fold more accuracy than the current method of selecting based on their dams' yield accelerating expected genetic growth in Gir cattle.

Boosting the potential of cattle breeding using molecular biology, genetics, and bioinformatics approaches – a review

Cattle are among the most important farm animals that underwent an intense selection with the aim to increase milk production and to improve growth and meat properties, meanwhile reducing the generation interval allowing for a faster herd turnover. Recently, a shift from traditional breeding methods to breeding based on genetic testing has been observed. In this perspective, we review the techniques of molecular biology, genetics, and bioinformatics that are expected to further boost the agricultural potential of cattle. We discuss embryo selection based on next-generation and Nanopore sequencing and in vitro embryo production, boosting the potential of genetically superior animals. Gene editing of embryos could further speed up the selection process, essentially introducing a change in a single generation. Lastly, we discuss the host-microbiome co-evolution and adaptation. For example, cattle already adapted to low-quality low-cost fodder could be bred to achieve desired properties for the beef and dairy industry. The challenge of breeding and genetic editing is to accompany the selection on desired consumer-oriented traits with the push for sustainability and the adaptation to a changing climate while remaining economically viable. We propose that we are yet to see the limits of what is possible to achieve with modern technology for the cattle of the future; the ultimate goal will be to produce and maintain genetically elite individuals that can sustain the growing demands on the production.

Unlocking big data doubled the accuracy in predicting the grain yield in hybrid wheat

The potential of big data to support businesses has been demonstrated in financial services, manufacturing, and telecommunications. Here, we report on efforts to enter a new data era in plant breeding by collecting genomic and phenotypic information from 12,858 wheat genotypes representing 6575 single-cross hybrids and 6283 inbred lines that were evaluated in six experimental series for yield in field trials encompassing ~125,000 plots. Integrating data resulted in twofold higher prediction ability compared with cases in which hybrid performance was predicted across individual experimental series. Our results suggest that combining data across breeding programs is a particularly appropriate strategy to exploit the potential of big data for predictive plant breeding. This paradigm shift can contribute to increasing yield and resilience, which is needed to feed the growing world population.

Genomic prediction using a reference population of multiple pure breeds and admixed individuals

BACKGROUND

In dairy cattle populations in which crossbreeding has been used, animals show some level of diversity in their origins. In rotational crossbreeding, for instance, crossbred dams are mated with purebred sires from different pure breeds, and the genetic composition of crossbred animals is an admixture of the breeds included in the rotation. How to use the data of such individuals in genomic evaluations is still an open question. In this study, we aimed at providing methodologies for the use of data from crossbred individuals with an admixed genetic background together with data from multiple pure breeds, for the purpose of genomic evaluations for both purebred and crossbred animals. A three-breed rotational crossbreeding system was mimicked using simulations based on animals genotyped with the 50 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip.

RESULTS

For purebred populations, within-breed genomic predictions generally led to higher accuracies than those from multi-breed predictions using combined data of pure breeds. Adding admixed population's (MIX) data to the combined pure breed data considering MIX as a different breed led to higher accuracies. When prediction models were able to account for breed origin of alleles, accuracies were generally higher than those from combining all available data, depending on the correlation of quantitative trait loci (QTL) effects between the breeds. Accuracies varied when using SNP effects from any of the pure breeds to predict the breeding values of MIX. Using those breed-specific SNP effects that were estimated separately in each pure breed, while accounting for breed origin of alleles for the selection candidates of MIX, generally improved the accuracies. Models that are able to accommodate MIX data with the breed origin of alleles approach generally led to higher accuracies than models without breed origin of alleles, depending on the correlation of QTL effects between the breeds.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining all available data, pure breeds' and admixed population's data, in a multi-breed reference population is beneficial for the estimation of breeding values for pure breeds with a small reference population. For MIX, such an approach can lead to higher accuracies than considering breed origin of alleles for the selection candidates, and using breed-specific SNP effects estimated separately in each pure breed. Including MIX data in the reference population of multiple breeds by considering the breed origin of alleles, accuracies can be further improved. Our findings are relevant for breeding programs in which crossbreeding is systematically applied, and also for populations that involve different subpopulations and between which exchange of genetic material is routine practice.

Toward Genome-Based Selection in Asian Seabass: What Can We Learn From Other Food Fishes and Farm Animals?

Due to the steadily increasing need for seafood and the plateauing output of fisheries, more fish need to be produced by aquaculture production. In parallel with the improvement of farming methods, elite food fish lines with superior traits for production must be generated by selection programs that utilize cutting-edge tools of genomics. The purpose of this review is to provide a historical overview and status report of a selection program performed on a catadromous predator, the Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer, Bloch 1790) that can change its sex during its lifetime. We describe the practices of wet lab, farm and lab in detail by focusing onto the foundations and achievements of the program. In addition to the approaches used for selection, our review also provides an inventory of genetic/genomic platforms and technologies developed to (i) provide current and future support for the selection process; and (ii) improve our understanding of the biology of the species. Approaches used for the improvement of terrestrial farm animals are used as examples and references, as those processes are far ahead of the ones used in aquaculture and thus they might help those working on fish to select the best possible options and avoid potential pitfalls.

Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information

This study demonstrated the feasibility of a genomic evaluation for the dairy cattle population for which the small national training population can be complemented with foreign information from international evaluations. National test-day milk yield data records for the Slovenian Brown Swiss cattle population were analyzed. Genomic evaluation was carried out using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction method (ssGBLUP), resulting in genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). The predominantly female group of genotyped animals, representing the national training population in the single-step genomic evaluation, was further augmented with 7,024 genotypes of foreign progeny-tested sires from an international Brown Swiss InterGenomics genomic evaluation (https://interbull.org/ib/whole_cop). Additionally, the estimated breeding values for the altogether 7,246 genotyped domestic and foreign sires from the 2019 sire multiple across-country evaluation (MACE), were added to the ssGBLUP as external pseudophenotypic information. The ssGBLUP method, with integration of MACE information by avoiding double counting, was then performed, resulting in MACE-enhanced GEBV (GEBVM). The methods were empirically validated with forward prediction. The validation group consisted of 315 domestic males and 1,041 domestic females born after 2012. Increase, inflation, and bias of the GEBV(M) reliability (REL) were assessed for the validation group with a focus on females. All individuals in the validation benefited from genomic evaluations using both methods, but the GEBV(M) REL increased most for the youngest selection candidates. Up to 35 points of GEBV REL could be assigned to national genomic information, and up to 17 points of GEBVM REL could additionally be attributed to the integration of foreign sire genomic and MACE information. Results indicated that the combined foreign progeny-tested sire genomic and external MACE information can be used in the single-step genomic evaluation as an equivalent replacement for domestic phenotypic information. Thus, an equal or slightly higher genomic breeding value REL was obtained sooner than the pedigree-based breeding value REL for the female selection candidates. When the abundant foreign progeny-tested sire genomic and MACE information was used to complement available national genomic and phenotypic information in single-step genomic evaluation, the genomic breeding value REL for young-female selection candidates increased approximately 10 points. Use of international information provides the possibility to upgrade small national training populations and obtain satisfying reliability of genomic breeding values even for the youngest female selection candidates, which will help to increase selection efficiency in the future.

Autoregressive single-step model for genomic evaluation of longitudinal reproductive traits in portuguese holstein cattle

We investigated the applicability of ssGBLUP methodology under the autoregressive model (H-AR) for genomic evaluation of longitudinal reproductive traits in Portuguese Holstein cattle. The genotype data of 1,230 bulls and 1,645 cows were considered in our study. The reproductive traits evaluated were interval from calving to first service (ICF), calving interval (CI) and daughter pregnancy rate (DPR) measured during the first four parities. Reliability and rank correlation were used to compare the H-AR with the traditional pedigree-based autoregressive models (A-AR). In addition, a validation study was performed considering different scenarios. Higher genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) reliabilities were obtained for genotyped bulls when evaluated under the H-AR model, with emphasis on bulls with less than 9 daughters. For this group, the averages of GEBV reliabilities corresponded to 0.62, 0.69 and 0.62 for ICF, CI and DPR, respectively, while the averages obtained by the A-AR model were 0.27, 0.15 and 0.16. The validation study was favourable to H-AR. The best results were observed in the scenario where genotyped cows were combined with contributing bulls (genotyped bulls with daughter or relationship information in the population). Overall, the results suggest that ssGBLUP methodology under the autoregressive model is a feasible and applicable approach to be used in genomic analyses of longitudinal reproductive traits in Portuguese Holstein cattle.

Across-country genomic prediction of bull fertility in Jersey dairy cattle

The use of information across populations is an attractive approach to increase the accuracy of genomic predictions for numerically small breeds and traits that are time-consuming and difficult to measure, such as male fertility in cattle. This study was conducted to evaluate genomic prediction of Jersey bull fertility using an across-country reference population combining records from the United States and Australia. The data set consisted of 1,570 US Jersey bulls with sire conception rate (SCR) records, 603 Australian Jersey bulls with semen fertility value (SFV) records and SNP genotypes for roughly 90,000 loci. Both SCR and SFV are evaluations of service sire fertility based on cow field data, and both are intended as phenotypic evaluations because the estimates include genetic and nongenetic effects. Within- and across-country genomic predictions were evaluated using univariate and bivariate genomic best linear unbiased prediction models. Predictive ability was assessed in 5-fold cross-validation using the correlation between observed and predicted fertility values and mean squared error of prediction. Within-country genomic predictions exhibited predictive correlations of around 0.28 and 0.02 for the United States and Australia, respectively. The Australian Jersey population is genetically diverse and small in size, so careful selection of the reference population by including only closely related animals (e.g., excluding New Zealand bulls, which is a less-related population) increased the predictive correlations up to 0.20. Notably, the use of bivariate models fitting all US Jersey records and the optimized Australian population resulted in predictive correlations around of 0.24 for SFV values, which is a relative increase in predictive ability of 20%. Conversely, for predicting SCR values, the use of an across-country reference population did not outperform the standard approach using pure US Jersey reference data set. Our findings indicate that genomic prediction of male fertility in dairy cattle is feasible, and the use of an across-country reference population would be beneficial when local populations are small and genetically diverse.

The superiority of multi-trait models with genotype-by-environment interactions in a limited number of environments for genomic prediction in pigs

Background

Different production systems and climates could lead to genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions between populations, and the inclusion of G × E interactions is becoming essential in breeding decisions. The objective of this study was to investigate the performance of multi-trait models in genomic prediction in a limited number of environments with G × E interactions.

Results

In total, 2,688 and 1,384 individuals with growth and reproduction phenotypes, respectively, from two Yorkshire pig populations with similar genetic backgrounds were genotyped with the PorcineSNP80 panel. Single- and multi-trait models with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and BayesC π were implemented to investigate their genomic prediction abilities with 20 replicates of five-fold cross-validation. Our results regarding between-environment genetic correlations of growth and reproductive traits (ranging from 0.618 to 0.723) indicated the existence of G × E interactions between these two Yorkshire pig populations. For single-trait models, genomic prediction with GBLUP was only 1.1% more accurate on average in the combined population than in single populations, and no significant improvements were obtained by BayesC π for most traits. In addition, single-trait models with either GBLUP or BayesC π produced greater bias for the combined population than for single populations. However, multi-trait models with GBLUP and BayesC π better accommodated G × E interactions, yielding 2.2% – 3.8% and 1.0% – 2.5% higher prediction accuracies for growth and reproductive traits, respectively, compared to those for single-trait models of single populations and the combined population. The multi-trait models also yielded lower bias and larger gains in the case of a small reference population. The smaller improvement in prediction accuracy and larger bias obtained by the single-trait models in the combined population was mainly due to the low consistency of linkage disequilibrium between the two populations, which also caused the BayesC π method to always produce the largest standard error in marker effect estimation for the combined population.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings confirmed that directly combining populations to enlarge the reference population is not efficient in improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in the presence of G × E interactions, while multi-trait models perform better in a limited number of environments with G × E interactions.

Genomic prediction of growth traits for pigs in the presence of genotype by environment interactions using single-step genomic reaction norm model

Economically important traits are usually complex traits influenced by genes, environment and genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions. Ignoring G × E interaction could lead to bias in the estimation of breeding values and selection decisions. A total of 1,778 pigs were genotyped using the PorcineSNP80 BeadChip. The existence of G × E interactions was investigated using a single-step reaction norm model for growth traits of days to 100 kg (AGE) and backfat thickness adjusted to 100 kg (BFT), based on a pedigree-based relationship matrix (A) or a genomic-pedigree joint relationship matrix (H). In the reaction norm model, the herd-year-season effect was measured as the environmental variable (EV). Our results showed no G × E interactions for AGE, but for BFT. For both AGE and BFT, the genomic reaction norm model (H) produced more accurate predictions than the conventional reaction norm model (A). For BFT, the accuracies were greater based on the reaction norm model than those based on the reduced model without exploiting G × E interaction, with EV ranging from 0.5 to 1, and accuracy increasing by 3.9% and 4.6% in the reaction norm model based on A and H matrices, respectively, while reaction norm model yielded approximately 8.4% and 7.9% lower accuracy for EVs ranging from 0 to 0.4, based on A and H matrices, respectively. In addition, for BFT, the highest accuracy was obtained in the BJLM6 farm for realizing directional selection. This study will help to apply G × E interactions to practical genomic selection.

Prediction of breeding values for group-recorded traits including genomic information and an individually recorded correlated trait

Records on groups of individuals could be valuable for predicting breeding values when a trait is difficult or costly to measure on single individuals, such as feed intake and egg production. Adding genomic information has shown improvement in the accuracy of genetic evaluation of quantitative traits with individual records. Here, we investigated the value of genomic information for traits with group records. Besides, we investigated the improvement in accuracy of genetic evaluation for group-recorded traits when including information on a correlated trait with individual records. The study was based on a simulated pig population, including three scenarios of group structure and size. The results showed that both the genomic information and a correlated trait increased the accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) for traits with group records. The accuracies of EBV obtained from group records with a size 24 were much lower than those with a size 12. Random assignment of animals to pens led to lower accuracy due to the weaker relationship between individuals within each group. It suggests that group records are valuable for genetic evaluation of a trait that is difficult to record on individuals, and the accuracy of genetic evaluation can be considerably increased using genomic information. Moreover, the genetic evaluation for a trait with group records can be greatly improved using a bivariate model, including correlated traits that are recorded individually. For efficient use of group records in genetic evaluation, relatively small group size and close relationships between individuals within one group are recommended.

Symposium review: How to implement genomic selection

Genomic selection was adopted very quickly in the 10 yr after first implementation, and breeders continue to find new uses for genomic testing. Breeding values with higher reliability earlier in life are estimated by combining DNA genotypes for many thousands of loci using existing identification, pedigree, and phenotype databases for millions of animals. Quality control for both new and previous data is greatly improved by comparing genomic and pedigree relationships to correct parent-progeny conflicts and discover many additional ancestors. Many quantitative trait loci and gene tests have been added to previous assays that used only evenly spaced, highly polymorphic markers. Imputation now combines genotypes from many assays of differing marker densities. Prediction models have gradually advanced from normal or Bayesian distributions within trait and breed to single-step, multitrait, or other more complex models, such as multibreed models that may be needed for crossbred prediction. Genomic selection was initially applied to males to predict progeny performance but is now widely applied to females or even embryos to predict their own later performance. The initial focus on additive merit has expanded to include mating programs, genomic inbreeding, and recessive alleles. Many producers now use DNA testing to decide which heifers should be inseminated with elite dairy, beef, or sex-sorted semen, which should be embryo donors or recipients, or which should be sold or kept for breeding. Because some of these decisions are expensive to delay, predictions are now provided weekly instead of every few months. Predictions from international genomic databases are often more accurate and cost-effective than those from within-country databases that were previously designed for progeny testing unless local breeds, conditions, or traits differ greatly from the larger database. Selection indexes include many new traits, often with lower heritability or requiring large initial investments to obtain phenotypes, which provide further incentive to cooperate internationally. The genomic prediction methods developed for dairy cattle are now applied widely to many animal, human, and plant populations and could be applied to many more.

The Impact of Non-additive Effects on the Genetic Correlation Between Populations

Average effects of alleles can show considerable differences between populations. The magnitude of these differences can be measured by the additive genetic correlation between populations ([Formula: see text]). This [Formula: see text] can be lower than one due to the presence of non-additive genetic effects together with differences in allele frequencies between populations. However, the relationship between the nature of non-additive effects, differences in allele frequencies, and the value of [Formula: see text] remains unclear, and was therefore the focus of this study. We simulated genotype data of two populations that have diverged under drift only, or under drift and selection, and we simulated traits where the genetic model and magnitude of non-additive effects were varied. Results showed that larger differences in allele frequencies and larger non-additive effects resulted in lower values of [Formula: see text] In addition, we found that with epistasis, [Formula: see text] decreases with an increase of the number of interactions per locus. For both dominance and epistasis, we found that, when non-additive effects became extremely large, [Formula: see text] had a lower bound that was determined by the type of inter-allelic interaction, and the difference in allele frequencies between populations. Given that dominance variance is usually small, our results show that it is unlikely that true [Formula: see text] values lower than 0.80 are due to dominance effects alone. With realistic levels of epistasis, [Formula: see text] dropped as low as 0.45. These results may contribute to the understanding of differences in genetic expression of complex traits between populations, and may help in explaining the inefficiency of genomic trait prediction across populations.

Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits

Increasing the reliability of genomic prediction (GP) of economic traits in the pasture-based dairy production systems of New Zealand (NZ) and Australia (AU) is important to both countries. This study assessed if sharing cow phenotype and genotype data of NZ and AU improves the reliability of GP for NZ bulls. Data from approximately 32,000 NZ genotyped cows and their contemporaries were included in the May 2018 routine genetic evaluation of the Australian Dairy cattle in an attempt to provide consistent phenotypes for both countries. After the genetic evaluation, deregressed proofs of cows were calculated for milk yield traits. The April 2018 multiple across-country evaluation of Interbull was also used to calculate deregressed proofs for bulls on the NZ scale. Approximately 1,178 Jersey (Jer) and 6,422 Holstein (Hol) bulls had genotype and phenotype data. In addition to NZ cows, phenotype data of close to 60,000 genotyped Australian (AU) cows from the same genetic evaluation run as NZ cows were used. All AU and NZ females were genotyped using low-density SNP chips (<10K SNP) and were imputed first to 50K and then to ∼600K (referred to as high density; HD). We used up to 98,000 animals in the reference populations, both by expanding the NZ reference set (cow, bull, single breed to multi-breed set) and by adding AU cows. Reliabilities of GP were calculated for 508 Jer and 1,251 Hol bulls whose sires are not included in the reference set (RS) to ensure that real differences are not masked by close relationships. The GP was tested using 50K or high-density SNP chip using genomic BLUP in bivariate (considering country as a trait) or single trait models. The RS that gave the highest reliability for each breed were also tested using a hybrid GP method that combines expectation maximization with Bayes R. The addition of the AU cows to an NZ RS that included either NZ cows only, or cows and bulls, improved the reliability of GP for both NZ Hol and Jer validation bulls for all traits. Using single breed reference populations also increased reliability when NZ crossbred cows were added to reference populations that included only purebred NZ bulls and cows and AU cows. The full multi-breed RS (all NZ cows and bulls and AU cows) provided similar reliabilities in NZ Hol bulls, when compared with the single breed reference with crossbred NZ cows. For Jer validation bulls, the RS that included Jer cows and bulls and crossbred cows from NZ and Jer cows from AU was marginally better than the all-breed, all-country RS. In terms of reliability, the advantage of the HD SNP chip was small but captured more of the genomic variance than the 50K, particularly for Hol. The expectation maximization Bayes R GP method was slightly (up to 3 percentage points) better than genomic BLUP. We conclude that GP of milk production traits in NZ bulls improves by up to 7 percentage points in reliability by expanding the NZ reference population to include AU cows.

Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies

Both small dairy cattle populations and dairy cattle populations with a low level of linkage disequilibrium (LD) suffer from low reliability of genomic prediction. In this study, we investigated whether adding more genotyped cows to the reference population influences the rate of genetic gain and rate of inbreeding by affecting the reliability. A standard breeding program with a large reference population and high LD, which mimicked a breeding program for Danish Holstein population, was simulated as a reference. A Danish Jersey population with a small reference population and high LD and a Red Dairy Cattle population with a large reference population and low LD were also simulated. Two additional breeding programs were simulated for Danish Jersey and Red Dairy Cattle populations, where 2,000 additional genotyped cows were included in the population for genomic selection. All 5 simulated breeding programs were initiated by a founder population to generate LD resembling the real LD pattern, followed by a 20-yr conventional progeny-testing scheme with 1,000 or 10,000 genotyped progeny-tested bulls and a 10-yr genomic selection scheme with or without 2,000 additional genotyped cows. Evaluation criteria were annual monetary genetic gain and rate of true inbreeding. Our results showed that adding more genotyped cows to the reference in dairy cattle populations has the potential to increase genetic gain and reduce the rate of inbreeding, regardless of reference population size and level of LD. However, it is still not possible to reach the same genetic gain as in the simulated Danish Holstein population with either a small reference population or low LD. Our results also showed that in a small reference population with high LD, it is difficult to manage inbreeding because of lower accuracy compared with the simulated Danish Holstein population and a smaller number of relevant families to select from. Therefore, breeding strategies need to be chosen to match population size and structure. The rate of true inbreeding is always underestimated by pedigree inbreeding and even more in genomic breeding programs, indicating that some forms of genome-wide inbreeding, instead of pedigree-based inbreeding, should be used to monitor inbreeding when genomic selection is implemented.

Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information

Relationships play a very important role in studies on quantitative genetics. In traditional breeding, pedigree records are used to establish relationships between animals; while this kind of relationship actually represents one kind of relatedness, it cannot distinguish individual specificity, capture the variation between individuals or determine the actual genetic superiority of an animal. However, with the popularization of high-throughput genotypes, assessments of relationships among animals based on genomic information could be a better option. In this study, we compared the relationships between animals based on pedigree and genomic information from two pig breeding herds with different genetic backgrounds and a simulated dataset. Two different methods were implemented to calculate genomic relationship coefficients and genomic kinship coefficients, respectively. Our results show that, for the same kind of relative, the average genomic relationship coefficients (G matrix) were very close to the pedigree relationship coefficients (A matrix), and on average, the corresponding values were halved in genomic kinship coefficients (K matrix). However, the genomic relationship yielded a larger variation than the pedigree relationship, and the latter was similar to that expected for one relative with no or little variation. Two genomic relationship coefficients were highly correlated, for farm1, farm2 and simulated data, and the correlations for the parent-offspring, full-sib and half-sib were 0.95, 0.90 and 0.85; 0.93, 0.96 and 0.89; and 0.52, 0.85 and 0.77, respectively. When the inbreeding coefficient was measured, the genomic information also yielded a higher inbreeding coefficient and a larger variation than that yielded by the pedigree information. For the two genetically divergent Large White populations, the pedigree relationship coefficients between the individuals were 0, and 62 310 and 175 271 animal pairs in the G matrix and K matrix were greater than 0. Our results demonstrated that genomic information outperformed the pedigree information; it can more accurately reflect the relationships and capture the variation that is not detected by pedigree. This information is very helpful in the estimation of genomic breeding values or gene mapping. In addition, genomic information is useful for pedigree correction. Further, our findings also indicate that genomic information can establish the genetic connection between different groups with different genetic background. In addition, it can be used to provide a more accurate measurement of the inbreeding of an animal, which is very important for the assessment of a population structure and breeding plan. However, the approaches for measuring genomic relationships need further investigation.

Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs

BACKGROUND

For genomic selection in populations with a small reference population, combining populations of the same breed or populations of related breeds is an effective way to increase the size of the reference population. However, genomic predictions based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-chip genotype data using combined populations with different genetic backgrounds or from different breeds have not shown a clear advantage over using within-population or within-breed predictions. The increasing availability of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data provides new opportunities for combined population genomic prediction. Our objective was to investigate the accuracy of genomic prediction using imputation-based WGS data from combined populations in pigs. Using 80K SNP panel genotypes, WGS genotypes, or genotypes on WGS variants that were pruned based on linkage disequilibrium (LD), three methods [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), single-step (ss)GBLUP, and genomic feature (GF)BLUP] were implemented with different prior information to identify the best method to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs.

RESULTS

In total, 2089 and 2043 individuals with production and reproduction phenotypes, respectively, from three Yorkshire populations with different genetic backgrounds were genotyped with the PorcineSNP80 panel. Imputation accuracy from 80K to WGS variants reached 92%. The results showed that use of the WGS data compared to the 80K SNP panel did not increase the accuracy of genomic prediction in a single population, but using WGS data with LD pruning and GFBLUP with prior information did yield higher accuracy than the 80K SNP panel. For the 80K SNP panel genotypes, using the combined population resulted in a slight improvement, no change, or even a slight decrease in accuracy in comparison with the single population for GBLUP and ssGBLUP, while accuracy increased by 1 to 2.4% when using WGS data. Notably, the GFBLUP method did not perform well for both the combined population and the single populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of WGS data was beneficial for combined population genomic prediction. Simply increasing the number of SNPs to the WGS level did not increase accuracy for a single population, while using pruned WGS data based on LD and GFBLUP with prior information could yield higher accuracy than the 80K SNP panel.

Theoretical Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction in Chinese Indigenous Cattle

Simple Summary

In order to evaluate the potential application of genomic selection (GS) for Chinese indigenous cattle, we assessed the influence of combining multiple populations on the reliability of genomic predictions for 10 indigenous breeds of Chinese cattle using simulated data. We found the predictive accuracies to be low when the reference and validation populations were sampled from different breeds. When using multiple breeds for the reference population, the predictive accuracies were higher if the reference was comprised of breeds with close relationships. In addition, the accuracy increased in all scenarios when the heritability increased, and the genetic architecture of the QTL can affect genomic prediction. Our study suggested that the application of meta-populations can increase accuracy in scenarios with a reduced size of reference populations.

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has been widely considered as a valuable strategy for enhancing the rate of genetic gain in farm animals. However, the construction of a large reference population is a big challenge for small populations like indigenous cattle. In order to evaluate the potential application of GS for Chinese indigenous cattle, we assessed the influence of combining multiple populations on the reliability of genomic predictions for 10 indigenous breeds of Chinese cattle using simulated data. Also, we examined the effect of different genetic architecture on prediction accuracy. In this study, we simulated a set of genotype data by a resampling approach which can reflect the realistic linkage disequilibrium pattern for multiple populations. We found within-breed evaluations yielded the highest accuracies ranged from 0.64 to 0.68 for four different simulated genetic architectures. For scenarios using multiple breeds as reference, the predictive accuracies were higher when the reference was comprised of breeds with a close relationship, while the accuracies were low when prediction were carried out among breeds. In addition, the accuracy increased in all scenarios with the heritability increased. Our results suggested that using meta-population as reference can increase accuracy of genomic predictions for small populations. Moreover, multi-breed genomic selection was feasible for Chinese indigenous populations with genetic relationships.

Improvement of genomic prediction by integrating additional single nucleotide polymorphisms selected from imputed whole genome sequencing data

The availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data enables the discovery of causative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium with causative SNPs. This study investigated effects of integrating SNPs selected from imputed WGS data into the data of 54K chip on genomic prediction in Danish Jersey. The WGS SNPs, mainly including peaks of quantitative trait loci, structure variants, regulatory regions of genes, and SNPs within genes with strong effects predicted with variant effect predictor, were selected in previous analyses for dairy breeds in Denmark–Finland–Sweden (DFS) and France (FRA). Animals genotyped with 54K chip, standard LD chip, and customized LD chip which covered selected WGS SNPs and SNPs in the standard LD chip, were imputed to 54K together with DFS and FRA SNPs. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian four-distribution mixture models considering 54K and selected WGS SNPs as one (a one-component model) or two separate genetic components (a two-component model) were used to predict breeding values. For milk production traits and mastitis, both DFS (0.025) and FRA (0.029) sets of additional WGS SNPs improved reliabilities, and inclusions of all selected WGS SNPs generally achieved highest improvements of reliabilities (0.034). A Bayesian four-distribution model yielded higher reliabilities than a GBLUP model for milk and protein, but extra gains in reliabilities from using selected WGS SNPs were smaller for a Bayesian four-distribution model than a GBLUP model. Generally, no significant difference was observed between one-component and two-component models, except for using GBLUP models for milk.

Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population

Relatedness between reference and test animals has an important effect on the reliability of genomic prediction for test animals. Because genomic prediction has been widely applied in practical cattle breeding and bulls have been selected according to genomic breeding value without progeny testing, the sires or grandsires of candidates might not have phenotypic information and might not be in the reference population when the candidates are selected. The objective of this study was to investigate the decreasing trend of the reliability of genomic prediction given distant reference populations, using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian variable selection models with or without including the quantitative trait locus (QTL) markers detected from sequencing data. The data used in this study consisted of 22,242 bulls genotyped using the 54K SNP array from EuroGenomics. Among them, 1,444 Danish bulls born from 2006 to 2010 were selected as test animals. Different reference populations with varying relationships to test animals were created according to pedigree-based relationships. The reference individuals having a relationship with one or more test animals higher than 0.4 (scenario ρ < 0.4), 0.2 (ρ < 0.2), or 0.1 (ρ < 0.1, where ρ = relationship coefficient) were removed from reference sets; these represented the distance between reference and test animals being 2 generations, 3 generations, and 4 generations, respectively. Imputed whole-genome sequencing data of bulls from Denmark were used to conduct a genome-wide association study (GWAS). A small number of significant variants (QTL markers) from the GWAS were added to the array data. To compare the effects of different models, the basic GBLUP model, a Bayesian selection variable model, a GBLUP model with 2 components of genetic effects, and a Bayesian model with pooled array data and QTL markers were used for estimating genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of test animals. The reliability of genomic prediction decreased when the test animals were more generations away from the reference population. The reliability of genomic prediction was 0.461 for 1 generation away and 0.396 for 3 generations away, with the same number of individuals in the reference set, using a GBLUP model with chip markers only. The results showed that using the Bayesian method and QTL markers improved the reliability of genomic prediction in all scenarios of relationship between test and reference animals, in a range of 1.3% and 65.1% (4 generations away with only 841 individuals in the reference set). However, most gains were for predictions of milk yield and fat yield. There was little improvement for predictions of protein yield and mastitis, and no improvement for prediction of fertility, except for scenario ρ < 0.1, in which there was a large improvement for predictions of all traits. On the other hand, models including more than 10% polygenic effect decreased prediction reliability when the relationship between test and reference animals was distant.

Reliability of genomic prediction for milk fatty acid composition by using a multi-population reference and incorporating GWAS results

Background

Large-scale phenotyping for detailed milk fatty acid (FA) composition is difficult due to expensive and time-consuming analytical techniques. Reliability of genomic prediction is often low for traits that are expensive/difficult to measure and for breeds with a small reference population size. An effective method to increase reference population size could be to combine datasets from different populations. Prediction models might also benefit from incorporation of information on the biological underpinnings of quantitative traits. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) show that genomic regions on Bos taurus chromosomes (BTA) 14, 19 and 26 underlie substantial proportions of the genetic variation in milk FA traits. Genomic prediction models that incorporate such results could enable improved prediction accuracy in spite of limited reference population sizes. In this study, we combine gas chromatography quantified FA samples from the Chinese, Danish and Dutch Holstein populations and implement a genomic feature best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP) model that incorporates variants on BTA14, 19 and 26 as genomic features for which random genetic effects are estimated separately. Prediction reliabilities were compared to those estimated with traditional GBLUP models.

Results

Predictions using a multi-population reference and a traditional GBLUP model resulted in average gains in prediction reliability of 10% points in the Dutch, 8% points in the Danish and 1% point in the Chinese populations compared to predictions based on population-specific references. Compared to the traditional GBLUP, implementation of the GFBLUP model with a multi-population reference led to further increases in prediction reliability of up to 38% points in the Dutch, 23% points in the Danish and 13% points in the Chinese populations. Prediction reliabilities from the GFBLUP model were moderate to high across the FA traits analyzed.

Conclusions

Our study shows that it is possible to predict genetic merits for milk FA traits with reasonable accuracy by combining related populations of a breed and using models that incorporate GWAS results. Our findings indicate that international collaborations that facilitate access to multi-population datasets could be highly beneficial to the implementation of genomic selection for detailed milk composition traits.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-019-0460-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Facing Climate Change: Biotechnology of Iconic Mediterranean Woody Crops

The Mediterranean basin is especially sensitive to the adverse outcomes of climate change and especially to variations in rainfall patterns and the incidence of extremely high temperatures. These two concurring adverse environmental conditions will surely have a detrimental effect on crop performance and productivity that will be particularly severe on woody crops such as citrus, olive and grapevine that define the backbone of traditional Mediterranean agriculture. These woody species have been traditionally selected for traits such as improved fruit yield and quality or alteration in harvesting periods, leaving out traits related to plant field performance. This is currently a crucial aspect due to the progressive and imminent effects of global climate change. Although complete genome sequence exists for sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) and clementine (Citrus clementina), olive tree (Olea europaea) and grapevine (Vitis vinifera), the development of biotechnological tools to improve stress tolerance still relies on the study of the available genetic resources including interspecific hybrids, naturally occurring (or induced) polyploids and wild relatives under field conditions. To this respect, post-genomic era studies including transcriptomics, metabolomics and proteomics provide a wide and unbiased view of plant physiology and biochemistry under adverse environmental conditions that, along with high-throughput phenotyping, could contribute to the characterization of plant genotypes exhibiting physiological and/or genetic traits that are correlated to abiotic stress tolerance. The ultimate goal of precision agriculture is to improve crop productivity, in terms of yield and quality, making a sustainable use of land and water resources under adverse environmental conditions using all available biotechnological tools and high-throughput phenotyping. This review focuses on the current state-of-the-art of biotechnological tools such as high throughput -omics and phenotyping on grapevine, citrus and olive and their contribution to plant breeding programs.