Management of splenic “incidentalomas” found on ultrasound and computed tomography

Laparoscopic Approach to Primary Splenic Cyst: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Splenic cysts are rare benign lesions of the spleen, often asymptomatic and incidentally discovered during imaging studies. While many splenic cysts remain asymptomatic and do not require intervention, surgical management becomes essential in cases of symptomatic cysts, large cysts, or when malignancy cannot be ruled out. Laparoscopic surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive and effective approach for treating splenic cysts, offering advantages such as shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, and faster recovery. In this case report, we describe our experience with laparoscopic surgery for a symptomatic splenic cyst in a young patient.

Incidental Focal Spleen Lesions: Integrated Imaging and Pattern Recognition Approach to the Differential Diagnosis

Spleen lesions and pseudolesions, detected incidentally in imaging, are not uncommon and may require further work-up. The imaging appearance of focal splenic lesions (FSLs) may not be pathognomonic, because of considerably overlapping features. Consequently, all imaging techniques lack specificity to fully characterize FSLs. Clinical correlation is mandatory, so as, first of all, to categorize the patient as having or not having a history of solid or hematologic malignancy. Nowadays, many patients have old imaging studies available for comparison and, consequently, it is important to understand if the lesion was previously present or not, and if the size is the same or has changed. In the absence of comparison studies, and with a lack of imaging features of benignity, further investigation may be necessary, using PET, biopsy, or short-term follow-up. Some algorithms have been proposed to manage incidental FSLs; however, none of these strategies has been validated by prospective studies to date. In this review we illustrate the topic of incidental FSLs and we analyze a number of published algorithms.

WFUMB Position Paper-Incidental Findings, How to Manage: Spleen

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental Imaging Findings-The Role of Medical Ultrasound." IFs are less commonly encountered in the spleen than in many other abdominal organs but remain a frequent dilemma in clinical practice. A histological diagnosis is rarely necessary for patient management. Many IFs, such as secondary spleens and splenic cysts, are harmless and do not require any further investigation. The diagnosis of many other focal splenic lesions is, however, often problematic. The following overview is intended to illustrate a variety of incidentally detected spleen pathologies such as size variants, shape variants, secondary spleens, focal splenic lesions and splenic calcifications. It should aid the examiner in establishing the diagnosis. Moreover, it should help the ultrasound practitioner decide which pathologies need no further investigation, those requiring interval imaging and cases in which immediate further diagnostic procedures are required.

[Spleen biopsy: "pros and cons" or better "when and when not?"]

Due to the relatively high complication rate, the necessity of a spleen biopsy is controversially discussed. In establishing its indication, the clinical background and performed diagnostics must be considered. Based on the medical history, imaging procedures and sonographic course, different clinical scenarios are conceivable. The aim of this review is to describe the indications of splenic biopsy considering various clinical scenarios.

Evaluation of cross-sectional imaging features that aid in the differentiation of benign and malignant splenic lesions

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the role of cross-sectional imaging in differentiating between benign and malignant splenic lesions based on various imaging features.

METHODS

Database of imaging reports from January 2015 to December 2017 were searched dedicatedly for "spleen" or "splenic" terms to identify patients with splenic lesions found either on CT or MRI. The study cohort consisted of patients who had available histological reports or had follow-up imaging for a minimum of one year. Patients were categorized into the benign subcohort if they did not have a history of extra-splenic malignancy, and had a splenic lesion(s) falling into one of these categories: benign histopathology on biopsy, stable size and enhancement, or decreased size on follow-up imaging. Those who had malignant histopathology on biopsy were included in the malignant subcohort. Various morphologic features and enhancement patterns of these lesions were carefully reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to the final histopathologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 161 patients (54 % males, mean age ± SD = 59.7 ± 15.4) including 124 (77 %) in the benign and 37 (23 %) in the malignant subcohort. Benign lesions were more likely to be cystic (21.7 % vs 2.7 %, p < 0.001), homogenous (59.7 % vs. 29.7 %, p = 0.001) and to demonstrate well-defined borders (69.3 % vs. 29.7 % p= <0.001). Malignant lesions had significantly larger diameter (median size: 15 vs 11 mm, p = 0.03). Restricted diffusion was not seen in any of the benign lesions; however, 50 % of malignant lesions demonstrated restricted diffusion (p = 0.003). Features such as lesion distribution, presence of calcification, splenomegaly and number of lesions were not significantly different between benign and malignant lesions.

CONCLUSION

Smaller lesion diameter, well-defined border and homogeneity favor benign nature of splenic lesions while restricted diffusion should raise suspicion for malignancy.

Incidental splenic findings in pancreatosplenectomy specimens resected for primary pancreatic lesions

AIMS

Little has been written on the frequency and nature of incidental splenic lesions diagnosed on histopathological examination of pancreatosplenectomy specimens.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For 191 such specimens, incidental histological findings after haematopathologist re-review were tabulated. Cases suspicious for lymphoid malignancy underwent molecular analysis for immunoglobulin heavy and kappa light chain rearrangement. Follow-up was obtained on selected cases. In five cases (3%), the spleen was sampled but not mentioned in the original microscopic report; all were normal on re-review. Otherwise, most (171 of 186, 92%) were initially diagnosed as normal, with 160 (94%) remaining so on re-review. Findings on re-review not initially described (n = 11, 6%) included four cases with splenic morphology suspicious for possible leukaemia/lymphoma involvement. Additional findings included abscess formation, foamy macrophages, necrotising granulomas and simple cysts. Fifteen spleens were initially diagnosed as abnormal; the histopathological process was confirmed in all, including non-necrotising granulomas, cysts, Gamna-Gandy bodies, foamy macrophages, involvement by pancreatic neoplasm and involvement by known chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Molecular analysis was performed on the five cases of known/suspected lymphoma and two were positive for monoclonal gene rearrangement, including the known CLL and a previously undiagnosed case with similar immunophenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental splenic findings are not uncommon in pancreatosplenectomy specimens. While most are of limited clinical significance, low-grade lymphoproliferative disorders may go undetected if the spleen is overlooked. We recommend careful observation of splenic findings in these specimens, with a low threshold for haematopathological consultation when in doubt.

Radiologic Pearls for Internists: A Case-Based Review

Modern technologic advances in medical imaging and the increasing use of imaging across all disciplines in medicine have led to a striking rise in incidental findings unrelated to the original study indication. Often, these findings have no clinical relevance and will not impact the current or future health status of the patient. It is incumbent on radiologists to report these findings in a definitive and unambiguous manner. Similarly, it is essential for clinicians to restrain from further diagnostic investigation of incidental findings that are conclusive by imaging. A classic and common example is the finding of a cyst. This article presents several cases of incidentally found cysts for which a confident diagnosis can be made without any need for follow-up.