Assessing local structural perturbations in proteins

Conformational analysis of alternative protein structures

MOTIVATION

Alternative structural models determined experimentally are available for an increasing number of proteins. Structural and functional studies of these proteins need to take these models into consideration as they can present considerable structural differences. The characterization of the structural differences and similarities between these models is a fundamental task in structural biology requiring appropriate methods.

RESULTS

We propose a method for characterizing sets of alternative structural models. Three types of analysis are performed: grouping according to structural similarity, visualization and detection of structural variation and comparison of subsets for identifying and locating distinct conformational states. The alpha carbon atoms are used in order to analyse the backbone conformations. Alternatively, side-chain atoms are used for detailed conformational analysis of specific sites. The method takes into account estimates of atom coordinate uncertainty. The invariant regions are used to generate optimal superpositions of these models. We present the results obtained for three proteins showing different degrees of conformational variability: relative motion of two structurally conserved subdomains, a disordered subdomain and flexibility in the functional site associated with ligand binding. The method has been applied in the analysis of the alternative models available in SCOP. Considerable structural variability can be observed for most proteins.

AVAILABILITY

The results of the analysis of the SCOP alternative models, the estimates of coordinate uncertainty as well as the source code of the implementation are available in the STRuster web site: http://struster.bioinf.mpi-inf.mpg.de.

Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines

In this study, we address the problem of local quality assessment in homology models. As a prerequisite for the evaluation of methods for predicting local model quality, we first examine the problem of measuring local structural similarities between a model and the corresponding native structure. Several local geometric similarity measures are evaluated. Two methods based on structural superposition are found to best reproduce local model quality assessments by human experts. We then examine the performance of state-of-the-art statistical potentials in predicting local model quality on three qualitatively distinct data sets. The best statistical potential, DFIRE, is shown to perform on par with the best current structure-based method in the literature, ProQres. A combination of different statistical potentials and structural features using support vector machines is shown to provide somewhat improved performance over published methods.