Impact of imatinib on the pharmacokinetics and in vivo efficacy of etoposide and/or ifosfamide

Optimization of a clofarabine-based drug combination regimen for the preclinical evaluation of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to improve the predictive power of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs, also known as mouse avatars) to more accurately reflect outcomes of clofarabine-based treatment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients.

PROCEDURE

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were conducted using clofarabine at 3.5 to 15 mg/kg in mice. PDXs were established from relapsed/refractory ALL patients who exhibited good or poor responses to clofarabine. PDX engraftment and response to clofarabine (either as a single agent or in combinations) were assessed based on stringent objective response measures modeled after the clinical setting.

RESULTS

In naïve immune-deficient NSG mice, we determined that a clofarabine dose of 3.5 mg/kg resulted in systemic exposures equivalent to those achieved in pediatric ALL patients treated with clofarabine-based regimens. This dose was markedly lower than the doses of clofarabine used in previously reported preclinical studies (typically 30-60 mg/kg) and, when scheduled consistent with the clinical regimen (daily × 5), resulted in 34-fold lower clofarabine exposures. Using a well-tolerated clofarabine/etoposide/cyclophosphamide combination regimen, we then found that the responses of PDXs better reflected the clinical responses of the patients from whom the PDXs were derived.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified an in vivo clofarabine treatment regimen that reflects the clinical responses of relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL patients. This regimen could be used prospectively to identify patients who might benefit from clofarabine-based treatment. Our findings are an important step toward individualizing prospective patient selection for the use of clofarabine in relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL patients and highlight the need for detailed PK evaluation in murine PDX models.

Imatinib Inhibits the Renewal and Tumorigenicity of CT-26 Colon Cancer Cells after Cytoreductive Treatment with Doxorubicin

Conventional anti-cancer drugs preferentially eliminate differentiated cancer cells but those cells that are spared (i.e. cancer stem cells: CSC), initiate recurrence. We tested whether drugs that target receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) involved in developmental signaling cascades and activated in CSC, could be used to silence and/or to eliminate colorectal cancer cells refractory to conventional treatment with cytoreductive drugs. A sequential treatment model was thereby developed with doxorubicin (DOX) and imatinib. CT-26 mouse colon carcinoma cells were pre-treated with DOX to select DOX-refractory cells with CSC properties, which were then subsequently treated with RTK inhibitor imatinib, where their regrowth was found to be inhibited. Under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions, imatinib potently inhibited clonogenicity of DOX-refractory CT-26 cells. Treatment with DOX did not eliminate tumorigenic CT-26 cells, since CT-26 cells pre-exposed to DOX in vitro, when inoculated subcutaneously, induced tumors in 90 % of mice, as opposed to a 100 % rate in the case of chemonaive CT-26 cells. In mice inoculated with chemonaive CT-26 cells, tumor formation was not prevented by imatinib. However, imatinib prevented tumor formation in 50 % of mice inoculated with CT-26 cells pre-exposed to DOX in vitro, with the remaining 50 % mice showing delayed tumor formation. These results suggest that the sequential use of the drug imatinib, as a drug targeting cancer cells expressing stem cell features after conventional cytoreductive treatment, is a promising future strategy for preventing tumor recurrence.

A Phase I clinical trial of the combination of imatinib and paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapy

PURPOSE

Pre-clinical data suggest that combining imatinib with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy may improve imatinib efficacy. We conducted a Phase I study of imatinib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients were accrued to the study in a standard 3 + 3 design. Patients were restaged every two cycles, and those with stable disease (SD), or better, continued study treatment without interruption. Maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) and pharmacokinetic profiles of combination imatinib and paclitaxel were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, including 40 in the Phase I dose escalation portion. Alternating dose escalation of imatinib and paclitaxel on a 28-day cycle resulted in MTDs of 800 mg imatinib daily, on days 1-4, 8-11, 15-18, and 22-25, and 100 mg/m(2) paclitaxel weekly, on days 3, 10, and 17. Two expansion cohorts, comprising 10 breast cancer patients and 8 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, were enrolled at the MTDs. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms (64 %) and nausea/vomiting (71 %). The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (26 %), flu-like symptoms (12 %), and pain (12 %). There were no relevant differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug when given in combination compared with alone. Thirty-eight subjects were evaluable for response, 18 (47.4 %) of whom experienced clinical benefit. Five patients (13.2 %) had a partial response (PR) and 13 patients (34.2 %) had SD; the average time to progression in those with clinical benefit was 17 weeks (range: 7-28 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of imatinib and paclitaxel was reasonably safe and tolerable, and demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity. Further exploration in disease-specific Phase II trials is warranted.