Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study

Examining differences in out-of-hours primary care use in Belgium and the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study

Background

The organizational model of out-of-hours primary care is likely to affect healthcare use. We aimed to examine differences in the use of general practitioner cooperatives for out-of-hours care in the Netherlands and Belgium (Flanders) and explore if these are related to organizational differences.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study using routine electronic health record data of the year 2016 from 77 general practitioner cooperatives in the Netherlands and 5 general practitioner cooperatives in Belgium (Flanders). Patient age, gender and health problem were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

The number of consultations per 1000 residents was 2.3 times higher in the Netherlands than in Belgium. Excluding telephone consultations, which are not possible in Belgium, the number of consultations was 1.4 times higher. In Belgium, the top 10 of health problems was mainly related to infections, while in the Netherlands there were a larger variety of health problems. In addition, the health problem codes in the Dutch top 10 were more often symptoms, while the codes in the Belgian top 10 were more often diagnoses. In both countries, a relatively large percentage of GPC patients were young children and female patients.

Conclusion

Differences in the use of general practitioner cooperatives seem to be related to the gatekeeping role of general practitioners in the Netherlands and to organizational differences such as telephone triage, medical advice by telephone, financial thresholds and number of years of experience with the system. The information can benefit policy decisions about the organization of out-of-hours primary care.

[Delegation of Home Visits and Qualification of Health Care Assistants in Family Practices in Saxony, Germany - Results of the Cross-Sectional Study SESAM-5]

BACKGROUND

In the context of demographic changes and the shortage of family physicians in the primary care sector in Germany, the delegability of home visits to health care assistants is discussed. There is little information on the extent of home visits delegated. The aim of this article is to examine differences in the socio-demographic and organizational profile of delegating vs. non-delegating family doctors in Saxony and to describe the level of qualification of health care assistants.

METHODOLOGY

This cross-sectional study is part of a series of epidemiological studies in the federal state of Saxony, Germany. All family doctors in Saxony were contacted in 2014 (n=2677), of whom 11,2% participated. In a period of 12 months, family practices documented home visits within a randomly assigned week. Socio-demographic characteristics of the family practice and the level of qualification of health care assistants were surveyed.

RESULTS

A total of 274 family practices participated; 52,9% of all participating family doctors declared their willingness to delegate home visits, but only 8,5% of home visits were made by health care assistants. There were non-significant trends between the willingness to delegate and self-employment vs. being employed (92,4 vs. 84,6%, p=0,06), establishment in a single vs. shared practice (35,2 vs. 31,4%, p=0,09) and higher patient numbers per 3 months (x̄+= 1183,08 vs. 1092,16, p=0,07). The 224 health care assistants that participated in the study were mostly trained in nursing (39,7%) or as medical assistants (50,8%). The vast majority of the health care assistants (82,5%) had no further training or additional qualification; 19,6% completed further training that qualified them to have home visits formally delegated to them.

CONCLUSION

Among family doctors in Saxony there is a reported high willingness to delegate, which is not implemented sufficiently in practice. Delegation is based on personal confidence in health care assistants without formal qualification. Qualified delegation ensures high standards in patient care and this potential is not used in Saxony, particularly in rural areas with imminent shortages of medical care. More education about the opportunities of qualified delegation seems necessary.

Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment

Background

Primary care is a central element of healthcare and addresses the main health problems of the population. While primary care gains in importance due to an aging population, there is an ongoing debate on physician shortages in German rural regions. The study aims on analyzing the population’s preferences on primary healthcare and, therefore, on helping policy makers to make care delivery more responsive to patients’ needs when planning political reforms of primary care.

Methods

A paper-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to assess preferences of the population of eight rural regions in Germany. Based on literature search and qualitative research, six attributes were selected and included in the choice experiment. The survey presented participants with eight choice sets in which they had to choose between two possible scenarios of care. A conditional logistic regression as well as a latent class model (LCM) were used to analyze preferences for primary healthcare.

Results

Nine hundred four participants completed the survey (response rate 46.1%). The conditional logistic regression showed significant impact of the attributes “home visits”, “distance to practice”, “number of healthcare providers”, “opening hours of the practice”, and “diagnostic facilities” on the respondents’ choices of primary healthcare alternatives. Moreover, the LCM identified four classes that can be characterized by preference homogeneity within and heterogeneity between the classes.

Conclusion

Although the study revealed heterogeneous preferences among the latent classes, several similarities in preferences for primary care could be detected. The knowledge on these public preferences may help policy makers when implementing new models of primary care and, thus, raise the populations’ acceptance of future primary care provision and innovative care models.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0967-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Home visits in primary care: contents and organisation in daily practice. Study protocol of a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Medical care of homebound patients by home visits is an integral part of primary care in Germany and other industrialised countries. Owing to the sociodemography and changes in the health system, the need for home visits is projected to increase rather than decrease. Our study will provide information on content and organisation of home visits. This evidence is needed to assure sufficient medical care for homebound patients. Germany is one of the European nations with highest proportions of elderly age groups, so that our results will be indicative for other European countries with comparable organisation of primary care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This cross-sectional study is conducted over a period of 12 months. All home visits of each participating family practice are documented within a 1-week time period. The anonymous documentation of home visits is carried out by the family practitioner or medical assistant conducting the home visit. All Saxon Family practitioners received study information and were personally invited to participate in our study. Almost 303 (of 2677) family practitioners expressed their interest to participate to generate data on the content and organisational characteristics of home visits. Data analysis of more than 4000 home visits will take into account several patient-related and system-related parameters. Descriptive and multivariate analysis will be carried out by using non-parametric methods. Regarding expected cluster structure of the data, a multilevel analysis will be necessary.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study received ethical approval by the Ethical Commission of the TU Dresden and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Considering that the results of our project will be indicative for ageing societies with comparable organisation of primary care, we will publish them in international open access journals concerned with healthcare and primary care research and disseminate them by a final symposium and at national/international scientific events.