Hereditary risk factors for the development of gastric cancer in younger patients

Family history and gastric cancer incidence and mortality in Asia: a pooled analysis of more than half a million participants

BACKGROUND

The family history of gastric cancer holds important implications for cancer surveillance and prevention, yet existing evidence predominantly comes from case-control studies. We aimed to investigate the association between family history of gastric cancer and gastric cancer risk overall and by various subtypes in Asians in a prospective study.

METHODS

We included 12 prospective cohorts with 550,508 participants in the Asia Cohort Consortium. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate study-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between family history of gastric cancer and gastric cancer incidence and mortality, then pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Stratified analyses were performed for the anatomical subsites and histological subtypes.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up of 15.6 years, 2258 incident gastric cancers and 5194 gastric cancer deaths occurred. The risk of incident gastric cancer was higher in individuals with a family history of gastric cancer (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.32-1.58), similarly in males (1.44, 1.31-1.59) and females (1.45, 1.23-1.70). Family history of gastric cancer was associated with both cardia (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00-1.60) and non-cardia subsites (1.49, 1.35-1.65), and with intestinal- (1.48, 1.30-1.70) and diffuse-type (1.59, 1.35-1.87) gastric cancer incidence. Positive associations were also found for gastric cancer mortality (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41).

CONCLUSIONS

In this largest prospective study to date on family history and gastric cancer, a familial background of gastric cancer increased the risk of gastric cancer in the Asian population. Targeted education, screening, and intervention in these high-risk groups may reduce the burden of gastric cancer.

Comparison of incidence and prognosis between young and old gastric cancer patient in North-Western China: A retrospective cohort study

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer in the world and the second most common cancer in China. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GC between young and old patients after curative resection. Six hundred and eighty-six patients with GC resected were divided two groups according to patient age: Younger GC patients ≤40 years of age (YGC, n = 52) and older GC patients >40 years of age (OGC, n = 634). The YGC group had 52 (7.6%) patients in total 686 GC patients. YGC patients was predominant in women (53.8% vs 26.5%) compared with OGC patients. 5-year overall survival exhibited differences in tumor sites, tumor sizes, macroscopic types, T staging, N staging, rate of N staging (rN), tumor node metastasis staging, scope of gastrectomy, radical degree, and lymphatic vascular invasion within each of YGC and OGC group. Univariate analysis of the clinical factors affecting overall survival in YGC group revealed the significant differences in tumor size, macroscopic types (except Borrmann), T staging (except T2), N staging (N3a and N3b), rN, tumor node metastasis staging (III), scope of gastrectomy, radical degree, and lymphatic vascular invasion. Gender, N staging, rN, radical degrees were the independent prognostic factors of younger patients with GC. Similar results were found in the OGC groups. The significant differences in radical degree and lymphatic vascular invasion were found between male and female patients in YGC group. Similar results were found in the OGC groups. Our results showed that YGC patients differ from OGC patients in predominance of women. Gender, N staging, rN, radical degrees were independent risk factors for the prognosis in YGC patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcome and prognostic factors of very young gastric cancer

To explore the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognosis of very young gastric cancer (GC). From January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2021, GC patients under 30 years old treated in three tertiary hospitals were enrolled. Clinicopathological characteristics were summarized, prognostic factors and survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred patients were finally included, with a median age of 23 years.73 (73.0%) were female. Most patients had initial symptoms of abdominal pain (66.0%). The most common tumor locations were gastric antrum (38.0%) and gastric body (37.0%). The main histological types were diffuse (81.0%) and poorly differentiated (91.0%). Most patients presented with stage III-IV disease (82.0%) at diagnosis and the common sites of metastasis were ovary (39.5%) and peritoneum (27.6%). The mOS of the whole group was 23.3 months (95% CI 17.2-29.4). Moreover, the mOS of patients at stage I-II was not reached. The mOS of patients at stage III and stage IV was 40.6 months (95% CI 10.2-70.9) and 10.3 months (95% CI 8.9-11.6), respectively. The mDFS of stage I-III patients was 28.5 months (95% CI 14.7-42.3), and the mPFS of the metastatic patients was 4.5 months (95% CI 4.0-5.0). TNM stage (P = 0.005) and radical surgery (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. The very young GC were predominantly female, diffuse type, and advanced diagnosis. TNM stage and radical surgery were independent prognosis factors for overall survival.

Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer in the West

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. In Western countries, its lower prevalence and the absence of mass screening programmes contribute to late diagnosis and a slower implementation of minimally invasive treatments. A secondary prevention strategy through endoscopic surveillance of patients at high risk of intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma or by screening gastric cancer within colorectal screening programmes is cost-effective in intermediate-risk countries, though the identification of these patients remains challenging. Virtual chromoendoscopy with narrow-band imaging improves the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis, significantly increasing the sensitivity for intestinal metaplasia while preserving specificity. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia is feasible, correlates well with histological staging systems and also with gastric neoplasia risk and can be used to stratify risk. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the West achieves efficacy and safety outcomes similar to those reported for Eastern countries, and the long-term disease-specific survival is higher than 95%. A prospective comparative study with gastrectomy confirms its higher safety and its benefits concerning health-related quality of life. However, ESD is associated with a 5% risk of postprocedural bleeding and a 20% risk of non-curative resection. The knowledge of risk factors for adverse events and non-curative resection can improve patient selection. The risk of metachronous lesions after ESD is high (3–5% per year), and endoscopic surveillance is needed. The management of patients with non-curative resection can be optimized using risk scoring systems for lymph node metastasis.

Natural Products: Implication in Cancer Prevention and Treatment through Modulating Various Biological Activities

Cancer is one of the most leading causes of death worldwide. It is one of the primary global diseases that cause morbidity and mortality in millions of people. It is usually caused by different carcinogenic agents that damage the genetic material and alter the cell signaling pathways. Carcinogens are classified into two groups as genotoxic and non-genotoxic agents. Genotoxic carcinogens are capable of directly altering the genetic material, while the non-genotoxic carcinogens are capable of producing cancer by some secondary mechanisms not related to direct gene damage. There is undoubtedly the greatest need to utilize some novel natural products as anticancer agents, as these are within reach everywhere. Interventions by some natural products aimed at decreasing the levels and conditions of these risk factors can reduce the frequency of cancer incidences. Cancer is conventionally treated by surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy, but such treatments may be fast-acting and causes adverse effects on normal tissues. Alternative and innovative methods of cancer treatment with the least side effects and improved efficiency are being encouraged. In this review, we discuss the different risk factors of cancer development, conventional and innovative strategies of its management and provide a brief review of the most recognized natural products used as anticancer agents globally.

Gastric cancer in young patients: a separate entity with aggressive features and poor prognosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between young and old patients with gastric cancer (GC), and further determine the role of young age in the prognosis of GC.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III gastric adenocarcinomas undergoing curative surgery were enrolled, divided into young (aged 18-49 years, YG), middle-aged (50-59 years, MG), and old (≥ 60 years, OG) groups. Exclusion criteria were neoadjuvant therapy and history of malignant tumors. Clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence patterns were compared among three groups.

RESULTS

1131 patients were finally included, with 270, 314, and 547 cases in the YG, MG, and OG, respectively. Compared to others, YG had higher proportion of female, middle-third gastric cancer, poor differentiation, N3b stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. YG demonstrated poorer 5-year OS than MG (62.4% vs. 70.8%, P = 0.019), but better than OG (62.4% vs. 58.7%, P = 0.031). YG also suffered inferior 5-year DFS (75.2% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.040) compared with MG, and higher incidence of peritoneal recurrence than MG (15.1% vs. 5.2%, P < 0.001) and OG (15.1% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified young age as the independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.347, 95% CI 1.018-1.781, P = 0.037], DFS (HR = 1.601, 95% CI 1.079-2.376, P = 0.019), and peritoneal recurrence (HR = 2.936, 95% CI 1.505-5.726, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Young GC patients demonstrated aggressive features with poor prognosis and enhanced management may be warranted for this subgroup.

Gastric Cancer in Young Adults: A Different Clinical Entity from Carcinogenesis to Prognosis

Approximately 5.0% of gastric cancer (GC) patients are diagnosed before the age of 40 and are not candidates for screening programs in most countries and regions. The incidence of gastric cancer in young adults (GCYA) has declined over time in most countries except in the United States. Genetic alterations, environmental factors, and lifestyle may predispose some young adults to GC. According to molecular classifications, the cancer of most GCYA patients belongs to the genomically stable or microsatellite stable/epithelial-mesenchymal transition subtype, with the common genetic aberrations being mutations in CDH1. What characterizes GCYA are a higher prevalence in females, more aggressive tumor behaviors, diagnosis at advanced stages, fewer comorbidities and being better treatment candidates, and a similar or better survival outcome when compared with older patients. Considering the greater loss of life-years in younger patients, lowering the incidence of GC and diagnosing at a relatively early stage are the two most effective ways to decrease GC mortality. To achieve these goals, the low awareness of GCYA among general people, policy-makers, clinicians, and researchers should be changed.

Analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer in patients ≤40 and ≥40 years of age

Objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) in young patients is a troubling clinical problem. The aim of this study was to analyze whether patients ≤40 years of age with GC differ from patients (age >40 years) in terms of clinicopathological and selected genetic factors.Materials and methods: Between 1984 and 2011, data were collected for 840 GC patients diagnosed and treated for GC at the Department of Gastroenterology at Pomeranian Medical University. The following clinicopathological features were compared between two age groups: sex, symptom duration, family history of cancer, tumor site, stage (early vs. advanced), blood group, histology, Helicobacter pylori infection and BRCA2 C572T silent mutation status.Results: A total of 65 (7.7%) patients were age 40 years or younger. GC was predominant in women in the younger group (p < .001). Patients (≤40 years) more frequently reported a positive family history of cancer (p = .01) and a diffuse tumor type was more common in this group (p < .001). The two age groups did not differ significantly regarding symptom duration, tumor location or stage, H. pylori infection, blood group, or BRCA2 C572T silent mutation status. A comparison of male and female patients aged 40 years or less did not reveal sex-based differences in any analyzed features.Conclusion: Patients ≤40 years of age with GC differ from patient >40 years of age in having a predominance of women, diffuse tumor type, and positive family history of cancer. These results offer openings for further investigation of the relevance of these differences.

Environmental etiology of gastric cancer in Iran: a systematic review focusing on drinking water, soil, food, radiation, and geographical conditions

The aim of this systematic review study was to investigate the causal relationship between environmental factors and gastric cancer (GC) in Iran. In a narrow definition, the environment includes water, soil, air, and food. This definition was the main criterion for the inclusion of articles in this study. In addition, exposure to radiation and geographical conditions were considered as less investigated environmental factors in the literatures. International (PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Cochran) and national (Scientific Information Database) databases were searched for articles on GC and environmental risk factors in Iran. Twenty-six articles were found to meet the inclusion criteria after title, abstract, and full text review. Risk factors identified for GC include consumption of red meat; high fat, fried, and salted meat; smoked, salted, and fried foods; some dairy products; roasted and fried seeds; strong and hot tea; and un-piped and unchlorinated drinking water, as well as exposure to radiation, loess sediment, soft and grassy soil, soil containing low concentration of molybdenum, and proximity to volcanos. Fresh fruits and vegetable, fresh fish, and honey consumption were recognized as protective agents. Given the risk factors identified, strategies to prevent GC would be educating people to choose a healthy diet and to cook and store food properly, providing access to safe drinking water, taking into account topographical and geographical conditions in choosing a right location to build residential areas, and regulating the use of radiation-emitting devices.

Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review

Objective: Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with many influences contributing to the disease. The aim of this study was to identify the most important risk factors. Methods: This study was conducted in 2017 with a structured overview in the Science Directe, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science (ISI) databases. In the first step, articles were extracted based on their titles and abstracts; the quality of 43 articles was evaluated using the STORBE tool. Inclusion criteria were studies carried out on human, English language (first step), year of the study and the study type (second step). Results: Finally, 1,381 articles were found, of which 1,269 were excluded in primary and secondary screening. In reviewing the references of the remaining 44 papers, 4 studies were added. Finally, 43 articles were selected for the quality assessment process. A total of 52 risk factors for gastric cancer were identified and classified into nine important categories: diet, lifestyle, genetic predisposition, family history, treatment and medical conditions, infections, demographic characteristics, occupational exposures and ionizing radiation’. Conclusion: Several environmental and genetic factors are involved in the development of gastric cancer. Regarding the role of changes in ‘diet and lifestyle’, considering appropriate nutrition and improving the level of education and awareness of people is vital for early diagnosis and timely treatment of this disease, especially in people with a family history and genetic predisposition.

Serum CEA level lost its prognostic value in gastric cancer patients with AB blood type

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the relationship between ABO blood groups and serum CEA level in gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of serum CEA level in gastric cancer patients with different ABO blood types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2008 to April 2015, a total of 3234 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed in our institution. The clinicopathological characteristics and survivals were recorded. The prognostic value of serum CEA level within different ABO blood groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The ratio of male to female patients was 3.5:1. The median age was 57.4 years (range 20-87). In all, 980 cases (30.3%) were blood type A, 935 cases (28.9%) were blood type B, 331 cases (10.2%) were blood type AB and 988 cases (30.6%) were blood type O. The positive rate of preoperative serum CEA was 19.0%. The overall survival of patients with negative and positive CEA level were 60.2% vs 34.4% for A blood type (P<0.001), 63.6% vs 44.5% for B blood type (P<0.001), 64.7% vs 36.2% for O blood type (P<0.001), 59.9% vs 46.1% for AB blood type (P=0.210). Serum CEA level was an independent prognostic factor for patients with A, B, O blood type (all P<0.05). However, serum CEA level was not a prognostic factor for patients with AB blood type (P=0.898). The level of CEA were significantly associated with gender, tumor size, tumor location, differentiation degree, tumor depth and lymph node metastasis in patients with AB blood type (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum CEA was an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients with non-AB blood type, but lost its prognostic value in patients with AB blood type.

The -765G>C polymorphism in the cyclooxygenase-2 gene and digestive system cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Published data regarding associations between the -765G>C polymorphism in cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene and digestive system cancer risk have been inconclusive. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the genetic risk of the -765G>C polymorphism in the COX-2 gene for digestive system cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was performed in Pubmed, Medline (Ovid), Embase, CNKI, Weipu, Wanfang and CBM databases, covering all studies until Feb 10, 2014. Statistical analysis was performed using Revman5.2.

RESULTS

A total of 10,814 cases and 16,174 controls in 38 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that C allele carriers (GC+CC) had a 20% increased risk of digestive system cancer when compared with the homozygote GG (odds ratio (OR)=1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.44 for GC+CC vs GG). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant elevated risks were associated with C allele carriers (GC+CC) in Asians (OR = 1.46, 95% CI=1.07-2.01, and p=0.02) and Africans (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.57-2.87, and p< 0.00001), but not among Caucasians, Americans and mixed groups. For subgroup analysis by cancer type (GC+CC vs GG), significant associations were found between the -765G>C polymorphism and higher risk for gastric cancer (OR=1.64, 95% CI=1.03-2.61, and p=0.04), but not for colorectal cancer, oral cancer, esophageal cancer, and others. Regarding study design (GC+CC vs GG), no significant associations were found in then population-based case-control (PCC), hospital-based case-control (HCC) and family-based case-control (FCC) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggested that the -765G>C polymorphism of the COX-2 gene is a potential risk factor for digestive system cancer in Asians and Africans and gastric cancer overall.

The 765G>C polymorphism in the cyclooxygenase-2 gene and gastric cancer risk: an update by meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The 765G>C polymorphism in cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene has been extensively investigated for association with gastric cancer (GC). However, the results of different studies have been inconsistent. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the genetic risk of -765G>C polymorphism in the COX-2 gene for GC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Medline, CNKI database, Wanfang database, Weipu database, and Chinese Biomedical database, covering all publications (last search been performed on Jan 10, 2014). Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.2 and STATA 10.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 1,874 cases and 3,005 controls in 10 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that the variant C allele carriers (GC+CC) had a 69% increased risk of GC when compared with the homozygote GG (odds ratio (OR)=1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-2.61 for GC+CC vs GG). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant elevated risks were associated with C allele carriers in Asians (OR=1.75, 95%CI=1.40-2.18, and p<0.00001) and in Indians (OR=8.38, 95%CI=4.34-16.16, and p<0.00001) but not in Caucasians (OR=1.07, 95%CI=0.81-1.42, and p=0.62) or in Dutch (OR=0.53, 95%CI= 0.33-0.87, and p= 0.01).In the subgroup analysis by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status, a significantly increased risk was identified among H. pylori (+) (OR=3.58, 95%CI=2.33-3.50, and p<0.00001) and H. pylori (-) (OR=2.32, 95%CI=1.46-3.69, and p=0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggested that the -765G>C polymorphism in the COX-2 gene could be a risk factor for GC in Asians and Indians.

NFKB1 -94 insertion/deletion polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Previous studies on the associations of the NFKB1 -94 insertion/deletion polymorphism with cancer risk have produced conflicting results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to define the effect of the NFKB1 -94 insertion/deletion polymorphism on cancer risk. A search of the literature by PubMed was performed to identify studies based on the predetermined inclusion criteria. Twenty-three studies consisting of 6,494 cases and 9,884 controls were identified and analyzed. Overall, significant association was observed between the polymorphism and cancer risk under all genetic models. Subgroup analysis according to ethnicity and cancer type also detected significant association. The NFKB1 -94 insertion/deletion polymorphism was associated with cancer risk in Asian population (dominant model: OR=1.52, 95 % CI=1.17-1.98; recessive model: OR=1.50, 95 % CI=1.26-1.79; II vs. DD: OR=1.90, 95 % CI=1.37-2.65; ID vs. DD: OR=1.32, 95 % CI=1.05-1.66; I vs. D: OR=1.37, 95 % CI=1.17-1.60), but not in Caucasian population. In addition, significant associations in OC, HCC, and OSCC were observed, but significant associations were not found in BC and LC. The current meta-analysis suggested that NFKB1 -94 insertion/deletion polymorphism may influence cancer risk in Asian population.

COX-2-765G>C polymorphism increases the risk of cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Chronic inflammation has been regarded as an important mechanism in carcinogenesis. Inflammation-associated genetic variants have been highly associated with cancer risk. Polymorphisms in the gene cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), a pro-inflammation factor, have been suggested to alter the risk of multiple tumors, but the findings of various studies are not consistent.

Methods

A literature search through February 2013 was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI databases. We used odds ratios (ORs) with confidence intervals (CIs) of 95% to assess the strength of the association between the COX-2-765G>C polymorphism and cancer risk in a random-effect model. We also assessed heterogeneity and publication bias.

Results

In total, 65 articles with 29,487 cancer cases and 39,212 non-cancer controls were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR (95% CIs) in the co-dominant model (GC vs. GG) was 1.11 (1.02–1.22), and in the dominant model ((CC+GC) vs. GG), the pooled OR was 1.12 (1.02–1.23). In the subgroup analysis, stratified by cancer type and race, significant associations were found between the-765 C allele and higher risk for gastric cancer, leukemia, pancreatic cancer, and cancer in the Asian population.

Conclusion

In summary, the COX-2-765 C allele was related to increased cancer susceptibility, especially gastric cancer and cancer in the Asian population.

Clinicopathological significance of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and its relation with p53 in gastric cancer

AIM

Based on previous investigations, the progress of gastritis may lead to gastric carcinomas. In some epithelial tumors, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which is an inflammatory cytokine may inactivate p53 and play a role in tumorigenesis process. We decided to evaluate clinicopathological significance of MIF expression and the relation between p53 and MIF expressions in gastric adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Seventy-three consecutive cases of gastric adenocarcinomas, the tissue samples of which were available, were included in this study. Tissue sections were stained for MIF and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry and the expression was defined as positive (for more than 10%) and negative (for less than 10%) groups. Location of the tumor, histological subtypes, and grade of the tumor were determined by using routine H&E staining. Distant metastasis, lymph node involvement, and consequently the stage of tumor were specified. The patients' age and gender were obtained from their medical records. The relationship between expression of MIF and these variables was determined.

RESULTS

Overexpression of MIF was observed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells in 46.6% (34/73) of cases and nuclear immunostaining of p53 was observed in 37% (27/73) of cases. Expression of MIF was significantly correlated with the location of tumor, but this expression has no statistically significant correlation with variables including: age, gender histological subtypes, distant metastasis, and lymph node involvement, stage and grade of the tumor, and p53 tumor suppressor gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that MIF in gastric adenocarcinomas versus many other epithelial tumors cannot have a prominent role in tumor progress and inactivation of p53 tumor suppressor gene.

Family History as a Risk for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer: A Case Control Study

BACKGROUND

Although, family history of cancer is an important risk factor for upper gastrointestinal cancers development, but limited information is available on the upper gastrointestinal cancers associated with family history in Iran. The purpose of this study was to define upper gastrointestinal cancers risk associated with family history of cancer.

METHODS

This study was conducted as a case control study. A total number of 1,010 cases of upper gastrointestinal cancer and 1,010 healthy controls were recruited. For family history of cancer, questions were asked about any malignant tumor in first and second degree relatives. Adjusted odds ratio estimates for the association family history and upper gastrointestinal cancers risk and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were obtained.

RESULTS

A family history of any malignant tumor in relatives was associated with 1.3 fold increased risks of upper gastrointestinal cancers. A first-degree family history of esophageal and gastric cancer was significantly associated with upper gastrointestinal cancers development, with an adjusted OR of 4.7(CI 95%: 2.6-8.4).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that risk for upper gastrointestinal cancers increases among individuals with family history of cancer. Therefore, appropriate screening strategies especially in relatives of patients should be considered to prevent and control of disease.

Comparison of patients by family history with gastric and non-gastric cancer

AIM: To compare the gastric cancer (GC) patients by their family history with gastric and non-GC.

METHODS: Positive family histories within second-degree relatives and clinicopathological features were obtained for 256 patients.

RESULTS: Of the 256 probands, 112 (76 male, 36 female) were incorporated into familial GC (FGC) group: at least two GC members; 144 (98 male, 46 female) were included in the non-FGC group (relatives only affected with non-GCs). Of 399 tumors in relatives (181 from FGC against 212 from non-FGC), GC was the most frequent, followed by esophageal, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancer. Nasopharyngeal cancer was next to lung cancer but prior to breast and urogenital cancers. Most affected members aggregated within first-degree relatives (FGC: 66 siblings, 48 fathers, 31 mothers, four offspring; non-FGC: 56 fathers, 55 siblings, 43 mothers, and 15 offspring). The ratio of males to females in affected first-degree relatives was usually higher in male probands. Paternal history of GC was a slight risk for GC in males (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.53-2.69), while risk of GC by maternal history of non-GCs was increased in females (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.97). Diffuse-GC was the major histological type in all subgroups. Difference in tumor sites between the two groups was derived from an excess of upper sites in non-FGC female probands.

CONCLUSION: Distribution of associated non-GCs in a family history of GC may vary with geographic areas. GC may have different genetic and/or environmental etiology in different families, and a certain subtype may be inherited in a female-influenced fashion.

Cyclooxygenase polymorphisms in gastric and colorectal carcinogenesis: are conclusive results available?

OBJECTIVE

Cyclooxygenases (COX) are important enzymes not only in the maintenance of mucosal integrity but also in pathological processes, namely in inflammation and tumor development in the gastrointestinal tract. Our goal was to understand whether there is a clear role for COX polymorphisms in gastric and colorectal carcinogenesis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on observational studies assessing the involvement of COX polymorphisms at the onset of gastric or colorectal lesions, retrieved through a MEDLINE database search by May 2008. The dominant genetic model was assumed for each polymorphism and a random-effect model was used for pooling results.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were retrieved reporting a total of 26 COX polymorphisms (nine in COX1 and 17 in COX2 genes). Carriers of -1329A, -899C alleles, and *429TT genotype revealed increased risk for gastric cancer [odds ratio (OR)=1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-3.10, OR=2.02; 95% CI: 1.00-4.10 and OR=1.34; 95% CI: 1.06-1.71, respectively). For colorectal lesions, the -899G>C and -1329G>A polymorphisms also showed an increased risk for cancer (OR=1.35; 95% CI: 1.01-1.81 and OR=1.36; 95% CI: 1.11-1.66, respectively). Furthermore, C allele carriers of V102V single nucleotide polymorphisms presented a decreased risk for colorectal adenoma onset (OR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.58-1.03).

CONCLUSION

Although further studies, namely cohorts and/or adequately matched case-control studies, are required to unravel the impact of most COX polymorphisms, clearly there are evidences that support the involvement of -899G>C and -1329G>A COX2 polymorphisms in either gastric or colorectal carcinogenesis. These markers could be used to optimize management strategies (follow-up and/or chemoprevention).

Expression of cell adhesion molecule CD44 in gastric adenocarcinoma and its prognostic importance

AIM: To evaluate the relation of cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) expression with clinicopathological features of gastric adenocarcinoma, and also its effect on prognosis with an emphasis on the differences between intestinal and diffuse types.

METHODS: From 2000 to 2006, 100 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, who had undergone total or subtotal gastrectomy without any prior treatment, were studied. Haematoxylin & eosin (HE) staining was used for histological evaluation, including the type (Lauren’s classification) and grading of the tumor. The expression of CD44 in the gastric adenocarcinoma mucosa and the adjacent mucosa were determined by immunohistochemistry. The survival analysis was obtained using the Kaplan-Meier test.

RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 74 (74%) patients were male. The tumors were categorized as intestinal type (78%) or diffuse type (22%). Sixty-five percent of patients were CD44-positive. CD44 expression was not detected in normal gastric mucosa. Rather, CD44 was more commonly expressed in the intestinal subtype (P = 0.002). A significant relation was seen between the grade of tumor and the expression of CD44 (P = 0.014). The survival analysis showed a poor prognosis of patients with CD44-positive tumors (P = 0.008); and this was more prominent in the intestinal (P = 0.001) rather than diffuse type.

CONCLUSION: Cell adhesion molecule CD44 is highly expressed in gastric adenocarcinoma. CD44 expression is correlated with a poor prognosis in patients with the intestinal type of gastric adenocarcinoma. CD44 can, therefore, be utilized as a prognostic marker for this group of patients.

Distribution of ABO phenotypes in patients with congenital cardiac defects

BACKGROUND

Cardiac anomalies are among the most frequent congenital malformations, but the basic underlying causes for most cardiac defects remains undetermined. Some 40 years ago, a higher incidence of blood group B was reported in a small number of African-American children with congenital cardiac defects. In this study, we sought to re-evaluate this association using a larger population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We collected data from 1985 patients undergoing cardiac surgery from July, 2000, through December, 2004. We divided the patients into 6 subgroups according to their diagnosis. We then compared the prevalence of ABO phenotypes between the patients and the general population of the United States of America by chi-square analysis. There were no significant differences in the distribution of the ABO phenotypes amongst the subgroups of those with congenital cardiac disease, or any for subgroup compared to the general population.

CONCLUSION

While statistical significance is influenced by the size of the population within the United States of America and the small numbers within each of our subgroups of patients with congenital cardiac disease, we have been unable to show any relationship between the distribution of ABO phenotypes and the existence of congenital cardiac disease.