Summary adherence estimates do not portray the true incongruity between drug intake, nurse documentation and physicians' orders

Nonadherence to Cardiovascular Drugs Predicts Risk for Non-Arthritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Large-Scale National Study

Purpose: While patients with cardiovascular comorbidities are at a higher risk for the occurrence of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), it is unclear whether adherence to medication results in risk reduction. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether nonadherence to medical therapy for cardiovascular morbidity correlates with a higher risk for NAION when compared to patients with strict adherence. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted among members of Clalit Health Services in Israel from 2001 to 2022. For each of the 757 NAION cases, three controls (totaling 2271 patients) were matched based on birth year and sex, with a propensity score analysis employed to adjust for a range of comorbidities. A patient was deemed nonadherent with medical treatment if their purchased quantity of medication was less than 60% of the prescribed annual dosage. Mixed models were used to evaluate exposure differences, and conditional logistic regression was applied, incorporating adjustments for socioeconomic status and ethnicity, to examine the impact of medication nonadherence on NAION risk. Results: A total of 3028 patients were included in the study; 757 patients with the diagnosis of NAION and 2271 in the matched control group. The average age of NAION patients was 69 ± 9 years and 55% were male. After adjustments for socioeconomic status and ethnicity, nonadherence to calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.71) and anti-arrhythmic (OR: 5.67, 95% CI: 1.89-21.2) medications emerged as significant risk factors. Similarly, nonadherence to cardioprotective medications (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.74) was also identified as a significant risk factor. Conclusions: Nonadherence to treatments for cardiovascular disease, specifically to medications known to improve prognosis, is associated with a higher risk for NAION.

Admission of kidney patients to a closed staff nephrology department results in a better short-term survival

BACKGROUND

The outcome of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) is often dismal and measures to ameliorate their course are scarce. When admitted to the hospital, kidney patients are often hospitalized in general Medicine wards rather than in a specialized Nephrology department. In the current study, we compared the outcome of two cohorts of kidney patients (CKD and AKI) admitted either to general open-staff (with rotating physicians) Medicine wards or to a closed-staff (non-rotating Nephrologists) Nephrology ward.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 352 CKD patients and 382 AKI patients admitted to either Nephrology or General Medicine wards. Short-term (< = 90 days) and long-term (>90 days) outcomes were recorded for survival, renal outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, and dialysis complications. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression and negative binomial regression adjusting to potential sociodemographic confounders as well as to a propensity score based on the association of all medical background variables to the admitted ward, to mitigate the potential admittance bias to each ward.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-one CKD patients (48.6%) were admitted to the Nephrology ward and 181 (51.4%) were admitted to general Medicine wards. For AKI, 180 (47.1%) and 202 (52.9%) were admitted to Nephrology and general Medicine wards, respectively. Baseline age, comorbidities and the degree of renal dysfunction differed between the groups. Using propensity score analysis, a significantly reduced mortality rate was observed for kidney patients admitted to the Nephrology ward vs. general Medicine in short term mortality (but not long-term mortality) among both CKD patients admitted (OR = 0.28, CI = 0.14-0.58, p = 0.001), and AKI patients (or = 0.25, CI = 0.12-0.48, p< 0.001). Nephrology ward admission resulted in higher rates of renal replacement therapy (RRT), both during the first hospitalization and thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, a simple measure of admission to a specialized Nephrology department may improve kidney patient outcome, thereby potentially affecting future health care planning.

Self-reported medication intake vs information from other data sources such as pharmacy records or medical records: Identification and description of existing publications, and comparison of agreement results for publications focusing on patients with cancer - a systematic review

PURPOSE

To identify and describe publications addressing the agreement between self-reported medication and other data sources among adults and, in a subgroup of studies dealing with cancer patients, seek to identify parameters which are associated with agreement.

METHODS

A systematic review including a systematic search within five biomedical databases up to February 28, 2019 was conducted as per the PRISMA Statement. Studies and agreement results were described. For a subgroup of studies dealing with cancer, we searched for associations between agreement and patients' characteristics, study design, comparison data source, and self-report modality.

RESULTS

The literature search retrieved 3392 publications. Included articles (n = 120) show heterogeneous agreement. Eighteen publications focused on cancer populations, with relatively good agreement identified in those which analyzed hormone therapy, estrogen, and chemotherapy (n = 11). Agreement was especially good for chemotherapy (proportion correct ≥93.6%, kappa ≥0.88). No distinct associations between agreement and age, education or marital status were identified in the results. There was little evaluation of associations between agreement and study design, self-report modality and comparison data source, thus not allowing for any conclusions to be drawn.

CONCLUSION

An overview of the evidence available from validation studies with a description of several characteristics is provided. Studies with experimental design which evaluate factors that might affect agreement between self-report and other data sources are lacking.

Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients have a high pill burden, increasing their care complexity. A previous study in our institution's dialysis unit found notable discrepancies between medication prescriptions, purchases and patient reports of medication use: overall adherence to medication was 57%, on average; staff reported patients took 3.1 more medication types than actual purchases; concordance of patient purchases and nurse reports was found in 5.7 out of 23.6 months of patient follow-up. We sought to investigate patients and staff concepts and attitudes regarding medication care and to understand better the previously identified inconsistencies.

METHODS

We performed a qualitative research based on the grounded theory approach, using semi-structured, in-depth, interviews with patients and staff from the same dialysis unit studied previously, at the Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

RESULTS

Though all respondents described a seemingly synchronized system of care, repeated questioning revealed that staff distrust patient medication reports. Patients, on their part, felt that their monitoring and supervision were bothersome and belittling. Along with patients, nurses and physicians, we identified a "fourth" factor, which influences medication care - the laboratory tests. They serve both as biological parameters of health, but also as parameters of patient adherence to the prescribed medication regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant responses did not clearly resonate with previous findings from the quantitative study. The central role of laboratory tests should be carefully considered by the staff when interacting with patients. An interaction process, less adversarial, centering on the patient attitudes to medication care, might establish better communication, better cooperation and better patient outcomes.

A prospective evaluation of levofloxacin-based triple therapy for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection in Australia

BACKGROUND

First-line Helicobacter pylori eradication failure is a common and challenging problem.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of salvage levofloxacin-based triple therapy in Australia.

METHODS

Prospective patients referred after prior treatment failure(s) were prescribed esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g and levofloxacin 500 mg each twice daily for 10 days. All patients received detailed written and verbal adherence support. Outcome assessment was by 13 C-urea breath test and/or histology and urease test.

RESULTS

In 150 consecutive, evaluable patients (66% female, mean age 54 ± 14 years; six smokers), the main indications for treatment were peptic ulcer disease (17%), increased gastric cancer risk (20%), symptoms (35%) and other risk reduction (28%). The median number of previous treatments was 2 (range 1-7). Eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 90% (intention to treat (ITT)) and 91% (per-protocol (PP)) of patients. The eradication rate did not differ according to the type or number of prior treatments: 93% when ≤2 (n = 107) compared with 84% after three or more prior treatments (n = 43; P = 0.13) or with age, ethnicity or indication for treatment but it was higher in females (ITT 94 vs 82%, P = 0.04). Adherence was excellent (95%). No serious adverse effects were observed; mild adverse effects were reported in 11%. No primary levofloxacin resistance was observed in 20 concurrent cases.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of this levofloxacin-based triple therapy suggests it should be used as a salvage regimen in this region. Randomised comparative trials are unlikely to be done but these data compare favourably with local data for other salvage therapies.