Rationale and design of a prospective study: Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnaBotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE)

Treatment response to onabotulinumtoxinA in cervical dystonia patients with anterocollis and retrocollis

Anterocollis (AC) and retrocollis (RC) are less common cervical dystonia (CD) subtypes that are often under-represented in CD clinical trials. Herein we describe real-world demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment response to onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) in AC or RC patients from an observational, multicenter, prospective registry, CD PROBE. After three onabotA treatments, outcomes (CDIP-58, PGIC, CGIC, CD severity, TWSTRS) in patients with predominant AC or RC were compared to torticollis (TC) and all CD subtypes combined. The mean dosages at each treatment ranged from 153.5 to 195.4 U (AC) to 184.0-213.4 U (RC). After treatment, AC and RC patients reported improvements in the CDIP-58. "Much" or "very much improved" on PGIC and CGIC was reported by AC patients (n = 11/23, 48%) and clinicians (n = 14/23, 61%); and by RC patients (n = 14/24, 58%) and clinicians (n = 19/24, 83%). The mean total TWSTRS decreased from 45.7 (n = 59) to 36.1 (n = 23, 21.0% improvement) for AC patients and from 40.1 (n = 55) to 31.6 (n = 23, 21.2% improvement) for RC patients; the proportion of AC and RC patients with severe CD decreased. Outcomes for AC and RC were generally consistent with those for TC and all subtypes combined. Dysphagia was reported in 4/59 (6.8%) of AC patients (one serious), 7/55 (12.7%) of RC patients (none serious), 29/494 (5.9%) of TC patients (none serious), and 64/1012 (6.3%) of all CD patients (two serious). No new safety signals were identified. In conclusion, treatment with onabotA may relieve CD symptoms in some patients with AC and RC, consistent with results for other CD subtypes and the known safety profile of onabotA for the treatment of CD.

Therapeutic Benefit of Sensory Trick in Cervical Dystonia

Background

Sensory tricks (STs) are voluntary maneuvers that dampen the abnormal movement in cervical dystonia (CD).

Objectives

To investigate the effect of ST on CD severity and treatment.

Methods

Data on 1039 individuals with a modified Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) score were extracted from the CD Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) Efficacy study. Univariate and multivariate models evaluated the direct and indirect impact of ST on CD severity and treatment, while controlling for confounds.

Results

Complete ST was associated with a 10% lower mean onabotA dose. Absence of complete ST was associated with a higher onabotA dose after controlling for dystonia severity (OR = 1.37, P = 0.04). ST moderated the relationship between dystonia severity and toxin dose (β = -0.16, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

ST is related to lower CD severity and toxin dose. It may have a direct effect on lowering toxin dose, independent of CD severity.

Botulinum Neurotoxins: From Toxin to Medicine

Ancient scientific manuscripts indicate that Dr [...].

Treatment of cervical dystonia with Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA): Development, insights, and impact

Cervical dystonia (CD), the most common focal dystonia encountered in neurologic practice, is a chronic disorder in which the muscles of the neck involuntarily contract and cause abnormal postures and movements of the head, neck, and shoulders. Treatment of CD prior to botulinum toxin was unsatisfactory, as existing therapies often did not improve symptoms. The use of botulinum toxin for CD grew out of its success in treating blepharospasm, another type of focal dystonia. On the basis of results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, onabotulinumtoxinA was approved in 2000 in the US for the treatment of CD in adults in order to alleviate abnormal head position and neck pain. A subsequent large observational trial further demonstrated the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for CD, showing improvements in various rating scales, physician-reported measures, and profound positive effects on patient quality of life, including in amelioration of pain and improvements in work productivity. In addition, onabotulinumtoxinA treatment also reduced the complications of CD, as patients no longer develop contractures (permanent muscle and tendon shortening from prolonged untreated dystonia), which markedly limited the range of neck motion. The onset of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment also accompanied advances in understanding the functional anatomy of neck muscles, basal ganglia physiology, and video and other recording technology. Following the success of onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of CD, its use has been expanded into numerous other therapeutic indications, and these advances stimulated educational and training programs by various neurologic and other medical societies.

OnabotulinumtoxinA Dosing, Disease Severity, and Treatment Benefit in Patients With Cervical Dystonia: A Cohort Analysis From CD PROBE

Introduction

The Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00836017), a multicenter, prospective, observational registry, was designed to identify real-world practices and outcomes for patients with cervical dystonia (CD) treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA). This secondary analysis from CD PROBE aims to determine the impact of presentation subtype on onabotA utilization and CD severity.

Materials and Methods

The study cohort includes those who completed all 3 treatments, 4 office visits, and had data recorded for all assessments. Patient outcomes were assessed with the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58), Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), and determination of CD severity. Treatment interval, dose, and adverse events (AEs) were also recorded. Data were stratified according to prior exposure to botulinum toxins (BoNTs) and analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results

Torticollis was the most common presentation subtype in the study cohort (N = 350); the proportion of patients with torticollis was highest in those with severe disease. At each treatment, between 40.7 and 65.2% of those categorized as severe shifted to moderate or mild severity after treatment. Sustained improvements in CDIP-58 and TWSTRS were observed regardless of prior exposure to BoNTs. Dosing of onabotA generally increased from injection 1 to injection 3 and tended to be lower for patients naïve to BoNT. Median time interval between injections for the study cohort was 94.0 to 97.5 days. The most common AEs (dysphagia, muscular weakness) and injection intervals were similar between naïve vs. non-naïve patients; there were no serious treatment-related AEs.

Conclusions

This secondary cohort analysis from CD PROBE demonstrates that three repeat treatments with onabotA at intervals consistent with labeling attenuated disease severity and neck pain, resulting in sustained improvements in physician- and patient-reported outcomes. No new safety signals were identified.

Determining the Suitability of Registries for Embedding Clinical Trials in the United States: A Project of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative

BACKGROUND

Patient registries are organized systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on specified outcomes in a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure. Data collected in registries often coincide with data that could support clinical trials. Integrating clinical trials within registries to create registry-embedded clinical trials offers opportunities to reduce duplicative data collection, identify and recruit patients more efficiently, decrease time to database lock, accelerate time to regulatory decision-making, and reduce clinical trial costs. This article describes a project of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) intended to help clinical trials researchers determine when a registry could potentially serve as the platform for the conduct of a clinical trial.

METHODS

Through a review of registry-embedded clinical trials and commentaries, semi-structured interviews with experts, and a multi-stakeholder expert meeting, the project team addressed how to identify and describe essential registry characteristics, practices, and processes required to for conducting embedded clinical trials intended for regulatory submissions in the United States.

RESULTS

Recommendations, suggested practices, and decision trees that facilitate the assessment of whether a registry is suitable for embedding clinical trials were developed, as well as considerations for the design of new registries. Essential registry characteristics include relevancy, robustness, reliability, and assurance of patient protections.

CONCLUSIONS

The project identifies a clear role for registries in creating a sustainable and reusable infrastructure to conduct clinical trials. Adoption of these recommendations will facilitate the ability to perform high-quality and efficient prospective registry-based clinical trials.

Minimal clinically important change in patients with cervical dystonia: Results from the CD PROBE study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) on Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scores using data from Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE), which captured real-world practices and outcomes.

METHODS

Changes in the baseline TWSTRS scores (point and percentage changes) were compared to changes in the Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC) ratings. Using logistic regression, the discrimination of the model was determined.

RESULTS

Among the 479 patients who completed all TWSTRS assessments, the mean TWSTRS Total score significantly decreased from baseline (39.2) to the final visit (27.1) (P < .0001). TWSTRS Total score point changes that compared with PGIC assessments "very much improved," "much improved" or better, and "minimally improved" or better were -11, -9, and -8, respectively, and were similar to previously published changes (ie, a decrease of ≥10 points). TWSTRS Total score data met indicators of good cutoffs for discrimination of the model including ≥70% percentage of outcomes correctly classified when compared with PGIC ratings. The TWSTRS Total score mapped to PGIC and CGIC ratings better than any TWSTRS subscale score.

CONCLUSIONS

The MCIC for improvement was ≥8 points based on mean TWSTRS Total scores in patients with cervical dystonia when compared against the patient-based evaluation of benefit (PGIC).

Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Cervical Dystonia in Adults with Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of injecting botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) into the neck muscles to treat cervical dystonia (CD) in patients with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with cross-over design. We prospectively enrolled adults with dyskinetic CP who were over 20 years old and had been clinically diagnosed with CD for more than one year. The primary outcome measure was the change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) at four weeks from the baseline TWSTRS. Seventeen patients were initially enrolled, but one patient was excluded after the final evaluation because of a violation of the study protocol. At four weeks, the BoNT-A injections showed significant improvement in TWSTRS total scores compared to the saline injections (p = 0.0286 for ANCOVA). At 12 weeks, the BoNT-A injections resulted in greater improvements in TWSTRS total scores than the saline injections without statistical significance (p = 0.0783 for ANCOVA). Dysphagia occurred in three out of 16 patients: two after BoNT-A and one after saline. The dysphagia was transient and improved naturally within two weeks without any special treatment. BoNT-A injection for CD in adults with dyskinetic CP is relatively safe and improves pain and disability.

Multicenter observational study of abobotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in cervical dystonia: The ANCHOR-CD registry

BACKGROUND

The ANCHOR-CD prospective observational registry study evaluated the effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA in adult idiopathic cervical dystonia (CD) in clinical practice.

METHODS

Adults with CD were eligible. Treating physicians determined abobotulinumtoxinA dose and treatment interval. The primary endpoint was patient response rate (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale [TWSTRS] score reduction≥25% and Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] score of +2 or +3 at Week 4 of Cycle 1).

RESULTS

350 patients enrolled (75% women; mean age 59±13.6years; 27.4% botulinum neurotoxin-naive) and 347 received at least 1 treatment. The median abobotulinumtoxinA dose for Cycle 1 was 500 Units. At Week 4, the responder rate was 30.6% (n=304) and the TWSTRS total score decreased 27.4% from baseline. PGIC of at least "Much improved" was documented in 43.6% of patients and maintained in Cycles 2 through 4 (43.3%, 48.9%, and 52.8%, respectively). A total of 39 adverse events (31 study drug-related) were reported in 17 patients (5%); the most common were dysphagia (n=6), muscle weakness (n=4), and neck pain (n=3).

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the beneficial effect of abobotulinumtoxinA on CD in routine clinical practice as measured by improvements in TWSTRS and PGIC. No new safety concerns were identified.

The therapeutic usage of botulinum toxin (Botox) in non-cosmetic head and neck conditions - An evidence based review

Botulinum toxin (Botox) is an exotoxin produced from Clostridium botulinum. It blocks the release of acetylcholine from the cholinergic nerve end plates resulting in inactivity of the muscles or glands innervated. The efficacy of Botox in facial aesthetics is well established; however, recent literature has highlighted its utilization in multiple non-cosmetic medical and surgical conditions. The present article reviews the current evidence pertaining to Botox use in the non-cosmetic head and neck conditions. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science and the Cochrane databases limited to English Language articles published from January 1980 to December 2014. The findings showed that there is level 1 evidence supporting the efficacy of Botox in the treatment of laryngeal dystonia, headache, cervical dystonia, masticatory myalgia, sialorrhoea, temporomandibular joint disorders, bruxism, blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm and rhinitis. For chronic neck pain there is level 1 evidence to show that Botox is ineffective. Level 2 evidence exists for vocal tics and trigeminal. For stuttering, facial nerve paresis, Frey's syndrome and oromandibular dystonia the evidence is level 4. Thus, there is compelling evidence in the published literature to demonstrate the beneficial role of Botox in a wide range of non-cosmetic conditions pertaining to the head and neck (mainly level 1 evidence). With more and more research, the range of clinical applications and number of individuals getting Botox will doubtlessly increase. Botox appears to justify its title as 'the poison that heals'.

Design and rationale of a prospective, multi-institutional registry for patients with sinonasal malignancy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Assessment of patients with sinonasal malignancy is challenging due to the low disease incidence and diverse histopathology. The current literature is composed mainly of retrospective studies with heterogeneous cohorts, and the rarity of cases limits our understanding of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes. We describe the development of a prospective, multi-institutional registry that utilizes cloud-based computing to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with sinonasal cancer.

METHODS

A web-based, secure database was built to prospectively capture longitudinal outcomes and quality-of-life (QoL) data in patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignancy. Demographics, tumor staging, and treatment outcomes data are being collected. The Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 and University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire are administered at presentation and at recurring intervals. To date, seven institutions are participating nationally.

CONCLUSION

This prospective, multi-institutional registry will provide novel oncological and QoL outcomes on patients with sinonasal malignancy to inform management decisions and disease prognostication. The application of cloud-based computing facilitates secure multi-institutional collaboration and may serve as a model for future registry development for the study of rare diseases in otolaryngology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2C Laryngoscope, 126:1977-1980, 2016.

Neck Pain and Cervical Dystonia: Treatment Outcomes from CD PROBE (Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy)

BACKGROUND

Pain is a prevailing feature of cervical dystonia (CD), the most common form of focal dystonia. This analysis examined pain relief after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in CD subjects with moderate/severe pain from the Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE).

METHODS

CD PROBE was a prospective, multicenter, observational registry of CD subjects who were naïve to botulinum toxin (BoNT), new to physician, or had not received BoNT within ≥ 16 weeks if in a clinical trial. Subjects were eligible for 3 treatments, with variable session intervals. Descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized to evaluate the change in pain scores in the population with moderate/severe neck pain at baseline (Pain Numeric Rating Scale [PNRS] score 4 to 10).

RESULTS

Of 1046 enrolled, 733 (70.7%) had moderate/severe neck pain at baseline. Postinjection pain questionnaire responses 4 to 6 weeks after each of the 3 treatments revealed that a majority of subjects (67.1%, 72.4%, and 76.4%) reported pain relief; mean time to pain relief was 7.1, 7.4, and 7.6 days. All pain scales showed significant improvements from baseline to final visit (all P < 0.0001): PNRS, mean 6.6 to 3.8; CD Impact Profile-58 Pain and Discomfort subscale, mean 78.7 to 56.5; and Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Pain subscale, mean 12.6 to 8.5. Multivariable regression models showed that initial pain score significantly contributed to the final pain score for all scales.

CONCLUSION

Results from this real-world clinical registry indicate that a majority of CD subjects with moderate/severe neck pain experience significant relief following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment.

Impact of Cervical Dystonia on Work Productivity: An Analysis From a Patient Registry

BACKGROUND

Cervical dystonia is thought to result in high disease burden, but limited information exists on its impact on employment and work productivity. We utilized data from the Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for the Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00836017) to assess the impact of cervical dystonia on employment and work productivity and examine the effect of onabotulinumtoxinA treatments on work productivity.

METHODS

Subjects completed a questionnaire on employment status and work productivity at baseline and final visit. Baseline data were examined by severity of cervical dystonia, predominant subtype, presence of pain, prior exposure to botulinum toxin, and/or utility of a sensory trick. Work productivity results at baseline and final visit were compared in subjects who were toxin-naïve at baseline and received three onabotulinumtoxinA treatments.

RESULTS

Of 1,038 subjects, 42.8% were employed full- or part-time, 6.1% unemployed, 32.7% retired, and 11.8% disabled. Of those currently employed, cervical dystonia affected work status of 26.0%, caused 29.8% to miss work in the past month (mean, 5.1 ± 6.4 days), and 57.8% reported decreased productivity. Half of those unemployed were employed when symptoms began, and 38.5% attributed lost employment to cervical dystonia. Pain, increasing severity, and anterocollis/retrocollis had the largest effects on work status/productivity. Preliminary analyses showed that absenteeism and presenteeism were significantly decreased following onabotulinumtoxinA treatments in the subpopulation that was toxin-naïve at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis confirms the substantial negative impact of cervical dystonia on employment, with cervical dystonia-associated pain being a particularly important driver. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment appears to improve work productivity.

Practical guidance for CD management involving treatment of botulinum toxin: a consensus statement

Cervical dystonia is a neurological movement disorder causing abnormal posture of the head. It may be accompanied by involuntary movements which are sometimes tremulous. The condition has marked effects on patients’ self-image, and adversely affects quality of life, social relationships and employment. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is the treatment of choice for CD and its efficacy and safety have been extensively studied in clinical trials. However, current guidelines do not provide enough practical information for physicians who wish to use this valuable treatment in a real-life setting. In addition, patients and physicians may have different perceptions of what successful treatment outcomes should be. Consequently, an international group of expert neurologists, experienced in BoNT treatment, met to review the literature and pool their extensive clinical experience to give practical guidance about treatment of CD with BoNT. Eight topic headings were considered: the place of BoNT within CD treatment options; patient perspectives and desires for treatment; assessment and goal setting; starting treatment with BoNT-A; follow-up sessions; management of side effects; management of non-response; switching between different BoNT products. One rapporteur took responsibility for summarising the current literature for each topic, while the consensus statements were developed by the entire expert group. These statements are presented here along with a discussion of the background information.

Primary results from the cervical dystonia patient registry for observation of onabotulinumtoxina efficacy (CD PROBE)

BACKGROUND

The Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE; NCT00836017) is a prospective, observational, multicenter, real-world registry designed to assess the safety, effectiveness, and treatment utilization following multiple treatments of onabotulinumtoxinA.

METHODS

Subjects were naïve to botulinum toxin, new to practice, or had not received toxin in ≥ 16 weeks if in a clinical trial. Dosages and treatment intervals varied due to the real-world design. Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated changes over 3 treatments.

RESULTS

1046 subjects enrolled. Subjects were 74.4% female, 63.5% toxin-naïve, mean age 58.0 ± 14.7 years. The mean dose over 2481 treatment sessions was 189. 8 ± 87.1U, with average treatment intervals of 14.6 and 15.1 weeks. The mean Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Total score in subjects who completed all assessments (n=479) decreased from 39.2 at baseline to 27.1 at final visit (P<.0001). A high percentage of physicians reported improvement in Clinician Global Impression of Change after initial assessment; this significantly increased at final assessment (n=479, 91.2% vs 95.0%; P<.0001). Similarly, a high percentage of subjects reported improvement in Patient Global Impression of Change after initial assessment, which significantly increased at final assessment (n=470, 83.0% vs 91.7%; P<.0001). Significant reductions in all Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 scores were observed (n=407). Overall, 26.2% of subjects reported adverse events, including muscular weakness (7.0%) and dysphagia (6.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate robust improvement in clinical ratings and excellent tolerability following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of CD.

Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia: the science of dosing

The first-line treatment for cervical dystonia (CD) is botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), which has been established as a highly effective and well-tolerated therapy. However, this treatment is also complex and challenging to apply in clinical practice. Approximately 20% of patients discontinue therapy due to treatment failure, adverse effects, and other reasons. In addition, expert consensus recommendations are lacking to guide physicians in the optimal use of BoNT-A for CD. Among the issues still to be clarified is the optimal dosing frequency. The generally accepted standard for intervals between BoNT-A injections is ≥12 weeks; however, this standard is based primarily on the methodology of pivotal trials for the BoNT-A products, rather than on evidence that it is optimal in comparison to other intervals. While some retrospective, observational studies of BoNT-A used in clinical practice appear to support the use of ≥12-week dosing intervals, it is often unclear in these studies how the need for reinjection was determined. In contrast, a prospective dose-ranging trial in which patients were allowed to request reinjection as early as 8 weeks showed that about half of patients receiving abobotulinumtoxinA, at the currently recommended initial dose of 500 U, requested reinjection at 8 weeks. Moreover, results from an open-label, 68-week extension phase of the pivotal trial of incobotulinumtoxinA showed that 47.1% of patients had received reinjection at ≤12 weeks. Ongoing studies, such as the Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of BOTOX® Efficacy (CD PROBE), may help clarify this question of optimal dosing intervals for BoNT-A in CD.

Cervical dystonia and pain: characteristics and treatment patterns from CD PROBE (Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy)

To compare profiles of subjects with and without cervical dystonia (CD)-associated pain, to evaluate the contribution of pain and the motor component of CD on quality of life, and to compare the initial botulinum toxin treatment paradigm between pain groups, baseline data were used from the CD Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE), a multicenter, prospective, observational registry designed to capture real-world practices and outcomes for onabotulinumtoxinA CD treatment. Subjects were divided into no/mild pain [Pain Numeric Rating Scale (PNRS) score 0–3] and moderate/severe pain groups (PNRS score 4–10). Descriptive and differential statistics were utilized to compare groups. 1,037 subjects completed the first treatment session, reported baseline botulinum toxin status, and completed baseline PNRS. Those with no/mild pain were significantly older at baseline. Those subjects with moderate/severe pain had higher Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Severity (17.7 ± 5.1 vs. 16.2 ± 5.6, p < 0.0001) and Disability (12.7 ± 6.1 vs. 7.5 ± 5.6, p < 0.0001). CD subjects with moderate/severe pain received a higher mean dose (177.3 ± 82.9 vs. 158.0 ± 67.1 U, p = 0.0001) of onabotulinumtoxinA and were injected in more muscles (4.1 ± 1.4 vs. 3.7 ± 1.2, p < 0.0001) at initial treatment. CD PROBE clearly demonstrates the frequency of pain in CD and substantiates its importance when determining an optimal treatment paradigm. Future analyses of CD PROBE will further our understanding of the treatment patterns and outcomes related to onabotulinumtoxinA therapy for this disabling condition.

Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations

Many rating scales have been applied to the evaluation of dystonia, but only few have been assessed for clinimetric properties. The Movement Disorders Society commissioned this task force to critique existing dystonia rating scales and place them in the clinical and clinimetric context. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify rating scales that have either been validated or used in dystonia. Thirty-six potential scales were identified. Eight were excluded because they did not meet review criteria, leaving 28 scales that were critiqued and rated by the task force. Seven scales were found to meet criteria to be "recommended": the Blepharospasm Disability Index is recommended for rating blepharospasm; the Cervical Dystonia Impact Scale and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale for rating cervical dystonia; the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire for blepharospasm and cervical dystonia; the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Vocal Performance Questionnaire (VPQ) for laryngeal dystonia; and the Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale for rating generalized dystonia. Two "recommended" scales (VHI and VPQ) are generic scales validated on few patients with laryngeal dystonia, whereas the others are disease-specific scales. Twelve scales met criteria for "suggested" and 7 scales met criteria for "listed." All the scales are individually reviewed in the online information. The task force recommends 5 specific dystonia scales and suggests to further validate 2 recommended generic voice-disorder scales in dystonia. Existing scales for oromandibular, arm, and task-specific dystonia should be refined and fully assessed. Scales should be developed for body regions for which no scales are available, such as lower limbs and trunk.

Prospective Study Evaluating IncobotulinumtoxinA for Cervical Dystonia or Blepharospasm: Interim Results from the First 145 Subjects with Cervical Dystonia

BACKGROUND

We report the interim results from XCiDaBLE, a large, prospective, observational "naturalistic" study evaluating Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) for Cervical Dystonia or BLEpharospasm in the United States.

METHODS

Subjects (≥ 18 years old) with cervical dystonia (CD) are followed for two treatment cycles and monitored via Interactive Voice/Web Response. The subject's physician must have chosen to treat with incobotulinumtoxinA prior to and independent of enrollment in this study. Subject-reported scales include the Subject Global Impression-Severity and Improvement and Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58), and Work Productivity and Quality of Life (QoL) are assessed by means of an employment questionnaire and work history and the SF-12v2 Health Survey (SF-12v2). Subjects are seen by the investigator for three visits, which include a baseline visit (including the first injection), a second injection visit, and a final study visit (12 weeks after the second injection).

RESULTS

This ongoing study includes 145 subjects with a diagnosis of CD. The majority were female (82.3%) and white (91.0%) and had previously been treated with botulinum toxins (77.2%). There were 106 employed at the time of disease onset, but 12.6 years later only 44% were still employed at the time of enrolment into the study, and 20% were either receiving or seeking disability benefits. The mean total dose/treatment of CD was 225.2 units for the first injection. The CDIP-58 total score was significantly improved 4 weeks after the first injection compared to baseline (p≤0.0001). Most subjects noted improvement in their global impression assessment. No new or unexpected adverse events occurred.

DISCUSSION

The results from these interim analyses confirm previous controlled, single-dose studies of incobotulinumtoxinA in terms of efficacy and safety.

Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin injections in dystonia

Local chemodenervation with botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections to relax abnormally contracting muscles has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in a variety of movement disorders and other neurological and non-neurological disorders. Despite almost 30 years of therapeutic use, there are only few studies of patients treated with BoNT injections over long period of time. These published data clearly support the conclusion that BoNT not only provides safe and effective symptomatic relief of dystonia but also long-term benefit and possibly even favorably modifying the natural history of this disease. The adverse events associated with chronic, periodic exposure to BoNT injections are generally minor and self-limiting. With the chronic use of BoNT and an expanding list of therapeutic indications, there is a need to carefully examine the existing data on the long-term efficacy and safety of BoNT. In this review we will highlight some of the aspects of long-term effects of BoNT, including efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity.

[Dystonia as a common status against a common belief]

Primary dystonia is believed to be rare, and its estimated prevalence is roughly around 10-20 per 100,000 in the general population. In middle-aged or elderly people, the prevalence is much higher, reported to be over 700 per 100,000. Dystonia also occurs secondarily in various conditions, as drug-induced (acute or tardive) dystonia or in association with neurological disorders. Reported prevalence values may be underestimate. The diagnosis of dystonia tends to be delayed for several years after the onset of symptoms, or the symptoms may be left unrecognized or misinterpreted. "Dry eye" is common in the modern society and is a frequent misdiagnosis of blepharospasm. "Stiff sensation of the neck", a ubiquitous symptom among Japanese, may actually be a phenotype of cervical dystonia. A subset of "essential tremor" and tremor in SWEDDs (Scans Without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficits) reportedly have similar pathophysiology to dystonia. Occupational dystonia is common within a specific population. About 1% of musicians may suffer from musician's dystonia, and about one-third of professional or highly skilled golfers may have "yips", possibly a representation of dystonia. Dystonia is common against a general belief, and should be included among the differential diagnosis in patients with muscular hyperactivity and impaired voluntary movements.