Comparative evaluation of treatment with low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin only in patients with acute ischaemic stroke

Antecedent Aspirin Use Is Associated with Less Severe Symptoms on Admission for Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Aspirin is known to reduce stroke risk; however, its role in reducing severity of ischemic syndrome is not clear. We sought to investigate the relationship between antecedent aspirin use and stroke severity in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected database of consecutive AIS patients presenting to our center. Clinical characteristics (including antecedent aspirin use), imaging findings, and laboratory data were assessed in association with presenting stroke severity, as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Logistic regression models were used to determine univariate and multivariate predictors of baseline NIHSS.

RESULTS

Of the 610 AIS patients with admission brain magnetic resonance imaging available for volumetric analysis of acute infarct size, 241 (39.5%) used aspirin prior to stroke onset. Antecedent aspirin use (P = .0005), history of atrial fibrillation (P < .0001), acute infarct volume (P < .0001), initial systolic blood pressure (P = .041), admission glucose level (P = .0027), and stroke subtype (P < .0001) were associated with presenting stroke severity in univariate analysis. Antecedent aspirin use (P < .0001), history of atrial fibrillation (P < .0002), acute infarct volume (P < .0001), systolic blood pressure (P = .038), and glucose level (P = .0095) remained independent predictors of NIHSS in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Antecedent aspirin use was independently associated with milder presenting stroke severity, even after accounting for acute infarct volume. While the underlying biology of this apparent protective relationship requires further study, patients at high risk of stroke may benefit from routine aspirin use.

Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention

Background

Spin represents specific reporting strategies, either intentional or unintentional, to convince the reader that the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention in terms of efficacy and safety is greater than that shown by the results. The objectives of this study were to 1) develop a classification of spin specific to non-randomized studies assessing an intervention and 2) estimate the prevalence of spin in abstracts of reports of such studies.

Methods

In a first step, we developed a specific classification of spin for non-randomized studies by a literature review and pilot study. In a second step, 2 researchers trained in the field of methodology evaluated the prevalence of spin in the abstract of all non-randomized studies assessing an intervention published in the BioMed Central Medical Series journals between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013. All disagreements were resolved by consensus. We also determined whether the level of spin in abstract conclusions was high (spin reported without uncertainty or recommendations for further trials), moderate (spin reported with some uncertainty or recommendations for further trials) or low (spin reported with uncertainty and recommendations for further trials).

Results

Among the 128 assessed articles assessed, 107 (84 %) had at least one example of spin in their abstract. The most prevalent strategy of spin was the use of causal language, identified in 68 (53 %) abstracts. Other frequent strategies were linguistic spin, inadequate implications for clinical practice, and lack of focus on harm, identified in 33 (26 %), 25 (20 %), and 34 (27 %) abstracts respectively. Abstract conclusions of 61 (48 %) articles featured a high level of spin.

Conclusion

Abstract of reports of non-randomized studies assessing an intervention frequently includes spin. Efforts to reduce the prevalence of spin in abstract for such studies are needed.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0079-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Classical and pleiotropic actions of dipyridamole: Not enough light to illuminate the dark tunnel?

Dipyridamole is a platelet inhibitor indicated for the secondary prevention of transient ischemic attack. It inhibits the enzyme phosphodiesterase, elevates cAMP and cGMP levels and prevents platelet aggregation. Dipyridamole inhibits the cellular uptake of adenosine into red blood cells, platelets and endothelial cells that results in increased extracellular availability of adenosine, leading to modulation of cardiovascular function. The antiplatelet action of dipyridamole might offer therapeutic benefits in secondary stroke prevention in combination with aspirin. Inflammation and oxidative stress play an important role in atherosclerosis and thrombosis development, leading to stroke progression. Studies demonstrated anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-proliferative actions of dipyridamole. These pleiotropic potentials of dipyridamole might contribute to improved therapeutic outcomes when used with aspirin in preventing secondary stroke. Dipyridamole was documented as a coronary vasodilator 5 decades ago. The therapeutic failure of dipyridamole as a coronary vasodilator is linked with induction of 'coronary steal' phenomenon in which by dilating resistance vessels in non-ischemic zone, dipyridamole diverts the already reduced blood flow away from the area of ischemic myocardium. Dipyridamole at high-dose could cause a marked 'coronary steal' effect. Dipyridamole, however, at low-dose could have a minimal hemodynamic effect. Low-dose dipyridamole treatment has a therapeutic potential in partially preventing diabetes mellitus-induced experimental vascular endothelial and renal abnormalities by enhancing endothelial nitric oxide signals and inducing renovascular reduction of oxidative stress. In spite of plenteous research on dipyridamole's use in clinics, its precise clinical application is still obscure. This review sheds lights on pleiotropic pharmacological actions and therapeutic potentials of dipyridamole.

Heart dysfunction in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA does not predict all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Despite heart failure being a substantial risk factor for stroke, few studies have evaluated the predictive value of heart dysfunction for all-cause mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke, in particular in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate whether impaired heart function in elderly patients can predict all-cause mortality after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

METHODS

A prospective long-term follow-up analysis was performed on a hospital cohort consisting of n = 132 patients with mean age 73 ± 9 years, presenting with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, without atrial fibrillation. All patients were examined by echocardiography during the hospital stay. Data about all-cause mortality were collected at the end of the follow-up period. The mean follow-up period was 56 ± 22 months.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 58% of patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA had heart dysfunction. Survival analysis showed that heart dysfunction did not predict all-cause mortality in this cohort. Furthermore, in multivariate regression analysis age (HR 5.401, Cl 1.97-14.78, p < 0.01), smoking (HR 3.181, Cl 1.36-7.47, p < 0.01), myocardial infarction (HR 2.826, Cl 1.17-6.83, p < 0.05) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

In this population with acute ischemic stroke or TIA and without non-valvular atrial fibrillation, impaired heart function does not seem to be a significant predictor of all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up.