Long term cerebral and vascular complications after irradiation of the neck in head and neck cancer patients: a prospective cohort study: study rationale and protocol

Risk, prevention, screening and management of carotid artery stenosis in head & neck cancer patients-An evidence based review

Our review aims to clarify the incidence of carotid artery stenosis, risks of development, screening, management, and primary prevention strategies documented in the literature after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. The high prevalence of carotid stenosis after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers has made surveillance and risk stratification critical. In addition to general cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, risk factors for carotid artery stenosis after head and neck radiation included total plaque score, radiotherapy use and dosage, length of time after radiotherapy, and age greater than 50. Cancer subtype, namely nasopharyngeal cancer, may be correlated with increased risk as well, though contrasting results have been found. Interestingly, however, no significant relationship has been found between radiotherapy dose and stroke risk. Surgical management of post-radiation carotid stenosis is similar to that of stenosis unrelated to radiation, with carotid endarterectomy considered to be the gold standard treatment and carotid artery stenting being an acceptable, less-invasive alternative. Medical management of these patients has not been well-studied, but antiplatelet therapy, statins, and blood pressure control may be beneficial. The mainstay of screening for radiation-induced stenosis has been Doppler ultrasound, with measurement of changes in the intima-media thickness being a primary marker of disease development. A literature review was carried out using the MeSH terms "Carotid Artery Stenosis," "Head and Neck Neoplasms," and "Radiotherapy."

Impact of radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma on carotid stenosis risk: a meta-analysis

OBJECTS

Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most effective treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of RT on carotid stenosis in NPC patients, as well as to explore the risk factors for significant carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Studies reporting the carotid stenosis in NPC patients who underwent RT were found on PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Outcomes of our interest included incidence of overall/significant stenosis, Common Carotid Artery (CCA) stenosis, External Carotid Artery (ECA) stenosis, Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) stenosis, and risk factors for significant carotid stenosis.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled estimate showed that RT was associated with a significantly higher incidence of overall stenosis (Risk Ratio [RR = 3.53], 95% CI: 2.32‒5.37; p <  0.001) and significant stenosis (RR = 7.06, 95% CI: 3.61‒13.79; p <  0.001) as compared with controls. Moreover, patients treated with RT had a significantly higher risk of stenosis in CCA (RR = 6.87, 95% CI: 4.08‒11.58; p <  0.001), ICA (RR = 3.43, 95% CI: 1.35‒8.73; p =  0.010), ECA (RR = 9.37, 95% CI: 2.06‒42.68; p =  0.004), and ECA/ICA (RR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.52‒3.13; p < 0.001). Meta-analysis indicated that age (RR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.05‒2.04; p =  0.024), smoking habit (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02‒2.78; p =  0.045) and time interval from radiotherapy (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.07‒2.28; p =  0.02) were independent predictors of significant carotid stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that RT increased the risk of carotid stenosis in patients with NPC. Prevention and control measurements should be made for older NPC patients with longer interval from RT, especially those with smoking habit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Imaging Features of Postradiotherapy Changes in Head and Neck Cancers

Radiation therapy is the mainstay in the treatment of head and neck cancers, in addition to surgery and chemotherapy. Expected radiotherapy changes evolving over time may be confused with recurrent tumor. Conversely, even residual or recurrent tumor in the setting of postradiotherapy changes may be difficult to identify clinically or even by radiological imaging. Therefore, it is important to be familiar with the temporal evolution of these changes. The purpose of this pictorial essay is thus to illustrate distinctly the expected radiotherapy changes and radiotherapy-related complications in the head and neck region and to differentiate them from tumor recurrence on routine cross-sectional imaging techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging).

Is radiation-induced arteriopathy in long-term breast cancer survivors an underdiagnosed situation?: Critical and pragmatic review of available literature

PURPOSE

Although considered exceptional, radiation-induced arteriopathy in long-term breast cancer survivors involves three main arterial domains in the irradiated volume, namely axillary-subclavian, coronary, and carotid. Stenosis of medium-large arteries is caused by "accelerated" atherosclerosis, particularly beyond 10 years after long-forgotten radiotherapy. The present review aims at summarizing what is known about arteriopathy, as well as the state of the art in terms of diagnosis and therapeutic management.

DIAGNOSIS

Pauci-symptomatic over years, the usual clinical presentation of arteriopathy involves arm pain with coldness due to subacute or critical ischemia (arterial occlusion), wrongly attributed to an exclusive neurological disorder, and more rarely transient ischemic accident or angina. Evaluation of the supra-aortic trunks by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance angiography visualizes artery lesions, while Doppler ultrasonography in expert hands assesses diagnosis and downstream functional impact. In severe cases, more invasive angiography directly visualizes long irregular arterial stenosis (full-field radiotherapy), allowing accurate prognosis and treatment.

MANAGEMENT

Requires early diagnosis to enable initiation of medical treatment that increases blood flow (aspirin) as soon as moderate stenosis is detected, combined with correction of vascular risk factors. In intermediate cases, these therapeutic measures are completed by revascularization strategies using transluminal angioplasty-stenting (wall thickness). Antifibrotic treatment is useful in advanced cases with combined radiation injuries.

CONCLUSION

In follow-up of long-term breast cancer survivors with node irradiation, myocardial infarction is treated even if radiotherapy is forgotten, while recognition and diagnosis of chronic arm ischemia due to subclavian artery stenosis needs to be improved for appropriate therapeutic management.

Incidental Statin Use and the Risk of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack after Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Background and Purpose

Interventions to reduce the risk for cerebrovascular events (CVE; stroke and transient ischemic attack [TIA]) after radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNCA) are needed. Among broad populations, statins reduce CVEs; however, whether statins reduce CVEs after RT for HNCA is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to test whether incidental statin use at the time of RT is associated with a lower rate of CVEs after RT for HNCA.

Methods

From an institutional database we identified all consecutive subjects treated with neck RT from 2002 to 2012 for HNCA. Data collection and event adjudication was performed by blinded teams. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke and TIA. The secondary outcome was ischemic stroke. The association between statin use and events was determined using Cox proportional hazard models after adjustment for traditional and RT-specific risk factors.

Results

The final cohort consisted of 1,011 patients (59±13 years, 30% female, 44% hypertension) with 288 (28%) on statins. Over a median follow-up of 3.4 years (interquartile range, 0.1 to 14) there were 102 CVEs (89 ischemic strokes and 13 TIAs) with 17 in statin users versus 85 in nonstatins users. In a multivariable model containing known predictors of CVE, statins were associated with a reduction in the combination of stroke and TIA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 0.8; P=0.01) and ischemic stroke alone (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P=0.01).

Conclusions

Incidental statin use at the time of RT for HNCA is associated with a lower risk of stroke or TIA.

Clinical Assessment of Cognitive Function in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Prevalence and Correlates

Objective Identify the prevalence and clinical correlates of cognitive impairment in patients presenting for treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) using brief screening within a multidisciplinary care team. Study Design A case series with planned data collection of cognitive function, quality of life (QoL), and psychosocial variables. Setting Urban Midwest academic medical center. Subjects and Methods In total, 209 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of HNC between August 2015 and September 2016 who had a pretreatment assessment with a clinical health psychologist. At pretreatment assessment, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a brief screening tool for cognitive function, was administered along with a semistructured interview to gather information on psychiatric symptoms, social support, and substance use. Patient information, including demographics, clinical variables, and psychosocial variables, was extracted via chart review. A subset of patients with HNC completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Cancer at pretreatment assessment and was included in the QoL analyses. Results Cognitive impairment was associated with current alcohol use, past tobacco use and number of pack years, time in radiotherapy, and adherence to treatment recommendations. Social, emotional, and functional QoL scales were associated with cognitive impairment, including executive function, language, and memory. Conclusion Cognitive impairment is common in patients with HNC, and there are important associations between cognitive impairment and psychosocial, QoL, and treatment adherence variables. The results argue for the incorporation of cognitive screening as part of pretreatment assessment for patients, as well as further research into more direct, causal relationships via longitudinal, prospective studies.

The Benefit of Adjuvant Radiation in Surgically-Treated T1-2 N1 Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Importance

The benefit of adjuvant radiation in surgically treated T1‐2N1 oropharyngeal cancer without adverse pathologic features remains unclear

Objectives

To compare population‐level survival outcomes in surgically‐treated T1‐2N1 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with and without the use of adjuvant radiation.

Study Design

Retrospective population‐based study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data from 1998–2011.

Setting

Population‐level study.

Participants

Patients with T1‐2N1 OPSCC treated with surgical resection and neck dissection with or without adjuvant radiation.

Intervention(s) for Clinical Trials or Exposure(s) for observational studies

The use of postoperative adjuvant radiation.

Main Outcome(s) and Measures

Overall and disease‐specific survival.

Results

Radiation was utilized in 74% of patients and was positively associated with extracapsular extension and well‐differentiated histology. The use of radiation was associated with improved mean overall survival (124 v. 108 months, p=0.023) and a non‐significant increase in mean disease‐specific survival (138 v. 131 months, p=0.053).

Conclusions and Relevance

The use of adjuvant radiation is associated with improved survival in surgically‐treated T1‐2N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx with unknown HPV status.

Level of Evidence

IV

Cognitive function, depression, fatigue and quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer

Background

Long-term cancer treatment complications become more prevalent as survival improves. Little is known about the psychological complications in long-term survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC). We investigated cognitive functioning and its relation with depression, fatigue, cognitive complaints, and brain lesions on MRI.

Methods

This study is part of a multicentre, prospective cohort study of 65 patients treated for HNC. A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment was combined with validated questionnaires on subjective memory complaints, depression, and fatigue after a median of 7 years follow-up. Results were compared with age- and education-adjusted normative data. Further, we evaluated cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMH), brain volume, and infarctions on MRI.

Results

HNC patients had worse cognitive performance in two of the five assessed cognitive domains: episodic memory (z = -0.48, P = .003) and speed of information processing (z = -0.47, P < 0.001). Patients with fatigue performed worse than patients without fatigue on verbal fluency (mean difference in z-score 0.52, P = .02) and speed of information processing (0.49, P = .04). Patients with subjective memory complaints had a worse episodic memory performance (mean difference in z-score -0.96; P = .02). Patients with cerebral infarction(s) on MRI performed worse on fluency (mean difference in z-score 0.74, P = .005). A lower cognitive performance was not associated with depression, WMH or brain volume.

Conclusion

Long-term HNC survivors showed worse cognitive functioning 7 years after treatment. Cognitive function was associated with subjective complaints and fatigue, but not with depressive symptoms. Cerebral infarctions on MRI were correlated with cognitive function, whereas WMH, and brain volume were not.

Carotid and vertebral artery stenosis evaluated by contrast-enhanced MR angiography in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after radiotherapy: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of carotid artery (CA) and vertebral artery (VA) stenosis by contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after radiotherapy.

METHODS

72 patients with NPC after radiotherapy more than 3 years ago were recruited as irradiation group to investigate the incidence and degree of CA and VA stenosis by CE-MRA. The results were compared with those of the control group, which comprised 50 newly diagnosed patients with NPC who had not received radiotherapy.

RESULTS

There was a higher incidence of CA and VA stenosis in the irradiation group than in the control group in terms of patient number as well as vessel involvement. The incidence of significant (>50%) CA and VA stenosis, except for the basilar artery, was also higher in the irradiation group than in the control group. The most commonly detected stenosis in the irradiation group was found in the internal CA (ICA) and VA, followed by the external CA and common CA (CCA). CCA and/or ICA (CCA/ICA) stenosis was present in 67 (93.1%) of 72 patients, with 27 (37.5%) patients having significant CCA/ICA stenosis. The statistical analysis demonstrated that age at receiving CE-MRA scanning and time interval from radiotherapy were the independent predictors of significant CCA/ICA stenosis.

CONCLUSION

The CE-MRA scanning results showed that the incidence of stenosis seems to exist in a wider range of CAs and VAs in the patients with NPC after radiotherapy than in the patients who had not received radiotherapy, and the incidence of significant CCA/ICA stenosis is higher in patients with older age and longer interval from radiotherapy.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Radiation-induced CA and VA stenosis exists widely in patients with NPC after radiotherapy, and its prevalence is more common in patients with older age and longer interval from radiotherapy.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the carotid artery in long-term head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

In head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, long-term treatment-related complications include radiotherapy (RT)-induced carotid vasculopathy and stroke. The current study investigated the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of the carotid wall in long-term HNC survivors treated with RT.

METHODS

MRI of the carotid arteries was performed within a prospective cohort of 42 HNC patients on average 7 years after RT. Two independent radiologists assessed maximal vessel wall thickness of common and internal carotid arteries. In case of wall thickening (≥ 2 mm) the MRI signals as well as length of the thickened segment were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age of the 42 patients at baseline was 53 (13) years and mean (SD) follow-up time after RT was 6.8 (1.3) years. In total 62% were men and 60% had one or more cerebrovascular risk factors. Mean (SD) dose of RT on the common carotid arteries and internal carotid arteries was 57 Gy (11) and 61 Gy (10), respectively. Wall thickening was observed in 58% of irradiated versus 27% of non-irradiated common carotid arteries and 24% of irradiated versus 6% of non-irradiated internal carotid arteries (p < 0.05). Mean (SD) thickness of the irradiated and non-irradiated common carotid arteries was 2.5 (0.9) and 2 (0.7) mm (p = 0.02). Mean thickness of the irradiated and non-irradiated internal carotid arteries was 1.8 (0.8) and 1.5 mm (0.3) (n.s.). Mean length of the thickened vessel wall was 48 mm versus 36 mm in the irradiated versus non-irradiated common carotid arteries (p = 0.03) and 20 mm versus 15 mm in the irradiated versus non-irradiated internal carotid arteries (n.s.). No significant differences were observed for signal intensities of the vessel walls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed significantly more vessel wall thickening in irradiated versus non-irradiated carotid arteries years after RT for HNC, while no differences in signal intensities were observed.