Disseminated tumor cells as selection marker and monitoring tool for secondary adjuvant treatment in early breast cancer. Descriptive results from an intervention study

How much do we know about the metastatic process?

Cancer cells can leave their primary sites and travel through the circulation to distant sites, where they lodge as disseminated cancer cells (DCCs), even during the early and asymptomatic stages of tumor progression. In experimental models and clinical samples, DCCs can be detected in a non-proliferative state, defined as cellular dormancy. This state can persist for extended periods until DCCs reawaken, usually in response to niche-derived reactivation signals. Therefore, their clinical detection in sites like lymph nodes and bone marrow is linked to poor survival. Current cancer therapy designs are based on the biology of the primary tumor and do not target the biology of the dormant DCC population and thus fail to eradicate the initial or subsequent waves of metastasis. In this brief review, we discuss the current methods for detecting DCCs and highlight new strategies that aim to target DCCs that constitute minimal residual disease to reduce or prevent metastasis formation. Furthermore, we present current evidence on the relevance of DCCs derived from early stages of tumor progression in metastatic disease and describe the animal models available for their study. We also discuss our current understanding of the dissemination mechanisms utilized by genetically less- and more-advanced cancer cells, which include the functional analysis of intermediate or hybrid states of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Finally, we raise some intriguing questions regarding the clinical impact of studying the crosstalk between evolutionary waves of DCCs and the initiation of metastatic disease.

Prognostic value of disseminated tumor cells in unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Although pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) rarely metastasizes to the skeleton, disseminated tumor cells have been detected in bone marrow samples from patients with this disease. The prognostic value of such findings is currently unclear. Thus, the current study aimed to clarify the prognostic information associated with disseminated tumor cell detection in samples from patients with PDAC.

METHODS

Bone marrow aspirates were obtained from 48 patients with locally advanced (n = 11) or metastatic (n = 37) PDAC, before and after 2 months of chemotherapy. Disseminated tumor cells were detected with an mRNA panel and quantitative reverse transcription PCR. We used the highest levels measured in healthy bone marrow (n = 30) as a threshold to define the positive detection of disseminated tumor cells. Progression-free and overall survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

Disseminated tumor cells were detected in 15/48 (31%) bone marrow samples obtained before starting chemotherapy and in 8/25 (32%) samples obtained during chemotherapy. Patients with disseminated tumor cells detected before therapy had significantly shorter progression-free (p = 0.03; HR = 2.0) and overall survival (p = 0.03; HR = 2.0), compared to those without disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow. When restricting disseminated tumor cell detection to keratins KRT7 and KRT8, the prognostic information was substantially stronger (p = 1 × 10-6; HR = 22, and p = 2 × 10-5; HR = 7.7, respectively). The multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that disseminated tumor cell detection prior to treatment had independent prognostic value. In contrast, disseminated tumor cells detected during treatment did not have prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

Disseminated tumor cells detected before commencing chemotherapy had prognostic value in patients with inoperable PDAC.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Patients with Early Breast Cancer Is Associated with Increased Detection of Disseminated Tumor Cells in the Bone Marrow

Simple Summary

Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) present in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients are an indicator of minimal residual disease and micrometastatic spread. These cells can already be found at the earliest disease stages and are associated with poorer outcomes. In preclinical models, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was shown to promote micrometastatic spread. The aim of this large single-center retrospective study was to compare the frequency and prognostic significance of DTC detection between patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and treatment-naive patients.

Abstract

Preclinical data suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) may promote micrometastatic spread. We aimed to compare the detection rate and prognostic relevance of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) from the bone marrow (BM) of patients with early-stage breast cancer (EBC) after NAT with that of therapy-naive EBC patients. DTCs were identified from BM samples, collected during primary surgery. Patients who received NAT were compared to patients who received chemotherapy after surgery. In total, 809 patients were analyzed. After NAT, 45.4% of patients were DTC-positive as compared to 19.9% of patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (p < 0.001). When sampled in patients who had undergone NAT, the detection of DTCs in the BM was significantly increased (OR: 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1–4.4; p < 0.001). After NAT, DTC-positive patients with ≥2 DTCs per 1.5 × 10⁶ mononuclear cells in their BM had an impaired disease-free survival (HR: 4.8, 95% CI: 0.9–26.6; p = 0.050) and overall survival (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.4–12.7; p = 0.005). The higher rate of DTC-positive patients after NAT as compared to a treatment-naive comparable control cohort suggests that NAT supports tumor cell dissemination into the bone marrow. DTC positivity in BM predicted relapse in various distant organs, implying that tumor cell dissemination was not restricted to the bone marrow.

The Relationship Between Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Tumor Dormancy

Tumor dormancy, a state of tumor, is clinically undetectable and the outgrowth of dormant tumor cells into overt metastases is responsible for cancer-associated deaths. However, the dormancy-related molecular mechanism has not been clearly described. Some researchers have proposed that cancer stem cells (CSCs) and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) can be seen as progenitor cells of tumor dormancy, both of which can remain dormant in a non-permissive soil/niche. Nowadays, research interest in the cancer biology field is skyrocketing as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are capable of regulating tumor dormancy, which will provide a unique therapeutic window to cure cancer. Although the influence of MSCs on tumor dormancy has been investigated in previous studies, there is no thorough review on the relationship between MSCs and tumor dormancy. In this paper, the root of tumor dormancy is analyzed and dormancy-related molecular mechanisms are summarized. With an emphasis on the role of the MSCs during tumor dormancy, new therapeutic strategies to prevent metastatic disease are proposed, whose clinical application potentials are discussed, and some challenges and prospects of the studies of tumor dormancy are also described.

Prognostic Value of RANKL/OPG Serum Levels and Disseminated Tumor Cells in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

We assessed serum concentrations of the receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL) and its decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin (OPG), two proteins implicated in the development and progression of breast cancer, in 509 patients with primary, nonmetastatic breast cancer. Then the results were evaluated with regards to the occurrence of bone metastases, the presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow, survival, and risk of developing metastatic disease.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Before surgery, two bone marrow aspirates were analyzed for DTC using density centrifugation followed by immunocytochemistry (pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3). RANKL and OPG levels in the serum were measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

RANKL levels were significantly lower in women >60 years (P < 0.0001) and RANKL/OPG ratios higher in lymph node-positive patients (P < 0.05). High OPG serum levels were associated with a higher risk of death from breast cancer [HR 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-3.07; P = 0.005] and OPG was an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS; multivariate analyses, P = 0.035). RANKL levels were 33% higher (P < 0.0001) in DTC^pos patients (41%), whereas high levels were associated with a significantly better BCSS in DTC^neg patients as compared with low levels (HR 0.524; 95% CI 0.30-0.95; P = 0.04). RANKL serum levels were significantly increased in patients who developed bone metastases (P = 0.01) and patients within the highest quartile of RANKL had a significantly increased risk of developing bone metastases compared with those in the lowest (HR 4.62; 95% CI 1.49-14.34; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings warrant further investigation as they provide a rationale for novel diagnostic or therapeutic approaches.

NR2F1 stratifies dormant disseminated tumor cells in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow (BM) is an independent prognostic factor in early breast cancer but does not uniformly predict outcome. Tumor cells can persist in a quiescent state over time, but clinical studies of markers predicting the awakening potential of DTCs are lacking. Recently, experiments have shown that NR2F1 (COUP-TF1) plays a key role in dormancy signaling.

METHODS

We analyzed the NR2F1 expression in DTCs by double immunofluorescence (DIF) staining of extra cytospins prepared from 114 BM samples from 86 selected DTC-positive breast cancer patients. Samples collected at two or more time points were available for 24 patients. Fifteen samples were also analyzed for the proliferation marker Ki67.

RESULTS

Of the patients with detectable DTCs by DIF, 27% had ≥ 50% NR2F1high DTCs, chosen a priori as the cut-off for "dormant profile" classification. All patients with systemic relapse within 12 months after BM aspiration carried ≤ 1% NR2F1high DTCs, including patients who transitioned from having NR2F1high-expressing DTCs in previous BM samples. Of the patients with serial samples, half of those with no relapse at follow-up had ≥ 50% NR2F1high DTCs in the last BM aspiration analyzed. Among the 18 relapse-free patients at the time of the last DTC-positive BM aspiration with no subsequent BM analysis performed, distant disease-free intervals were favorable for patients carrying ≥ 50% NR2F1high DTCs compared with those with predominantly NR2F1low DTCs (p = 0.007, log-rank). No survival difference was observed by classification according to Ki67-expressing DTCs (p = 0.520).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study translates findings from basic biological analysis of DTC dormancy to the clinical situation and supports further clinical studies of NR2F1 as a marker of dormancy.

Tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer cell dissemination via the Akt/mTOR pathway

Metastasis causes high mortality in various malignancies, including prostate cancer (PCa). Accumulating data has suggested that cancer cells spread from the primary tumor to distant sites at early stage, which is characterized by disseminated tumor cells (DTCs). However, lack of direct evidence of partial localized PCa cells occurring epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and disseminating to distant sites (e.g bone marrow). In this study, we used luciferase labeled PCa cells to establish an EMT mouse model and to detect whether DTCs spread into the bone marrow. We observed tumor cells existing in mouse bone marrow when tumor grew subcutaneously at palpable stage. Studies also showed that ex vivo tumor cells exhibited increased proliferative, migratory, invasive and angiogenesis abilities. When compared ex vivo tumor cells with parental cells, hallmarks of EMT including E-cadherin, Vimentin, Snail, and ZO-1 were altered significantly. Specifically, the ex vivo tumor cells showed more mesenchymal properties. Angiogenesis markers, including VEGFR2, VEGFR3, MCP-3, I-TAC, I309, uPAR and GROα, were also increased in the ex vivo tumor cells. Intriguingly, MCP-1 expression was dramatically increased in those cells. Mechanistic analyses indicated that AP1 mediates PCa EMT and the appearance of DTCs via the Akt/mTOR pathway. This study may provide potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers of PCa progression and metastasis.

Cancer cell dormancy: mechanisms and implications of cancer recurrence and metastasis

More recently, disease metastasis and relapse in many cancer patients several years (even some decades) after surgical remission are regarded as tumor dormancy. However, the knowledge of this phenomenon is cripplingly limited. Substantial quantities of reviews have summarized three main potential models that can be put forth to explain such process, including angiogenic dormancy, immunologic dormancy, and cellular dormancy. In this review, newly uncovered mechanisms governing cancer cell dormancy are discussed, with an emphasis on the cross talk between dormant cancer cells and their microenvironments. In addition, potential mechanisms of reactivation of these dormant cells in certain anatomic sites including lymph nodes and bone marrow are discussed. Molecular mechanism of cellular dormancy in head and neck cancer is also involved.

Detection of circulating tumor cells using manually performed immunocytochemistry (MICC) does not correlate with outcome in patients with early breast cancer - Results of the German SUCCESS-A- trial

Background

Recently, the prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in primary breast cancer as assessed using the Food-and-Drug-Administration-approved CellSearch® system has been demonstrated. Here, we evaluated the prognostic relevance of CTCs, as determined using manually performed immunocytochemistry (MICC) in peripheral blood at primary diagnosis, in patients from the prospectively randomized multicenter SUCCESS-A trial (EudraCT2005000490-21).

Methods

We analyzed 23 ml of blood from 1221 patients with node-positive or high risk node-negative breast cancer before adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy. Cells were separated using a density gradient followed by epithelial cell labeling with the anti-cytokeratin-antibody A45-B/B3, immunohistochemical staining with new fuchsin, and cytospin preparation. All cytospins were screened for CTCs, and the cutoff for positivity was at least one CTC. The prognostic value of CTCs with regard to disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) was assessed using both univariate analyses applying the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests, and using multivariate Cox regressions adjusted for other predictive factors.

Results

In 20.6 % of all patients (n = 251) a median of 1 (range, 1–256) CTC was detected, while 79.4 % of the patients (n = 970) were negative for CTCs before adjuvant chemotherapy. A pT1 tumor was present in 40.0 % of patients, 4.8 % had G1 grading and 34.6 % were node-negative. There was no association between CTC positivity and tumor stage, nodal status, grading, histological type, hormone receptor status, Her2 status, menopausal status or treatment. Univariate survival analyses based on a median follow-up of 64 months revealed no significant differences between CTC-positive and CTC-negative patients with regard to DFS, DDFS, BCSS, or OS. This was confirmed by fully adjusted multivariate Cox regressions, showing that the presence of CTCs (yes/no) as assessed by MICC did not predict DFS, DDFS, BCSS or OS.

Conclusions

We could not demonstrate prognostic relevance regarding CTCs that were quantified using the MICC method at the time of primary diagnosis in our cohort of early breast cancer patients. Further studies are necessary to evaluate if the presence of CTCs assessed using MICC has prognostic relevance, or can be used for risk stratification and treatment monitoring in adjuvant breast cancer.

Trial registration

The ClinicalTrial.gov registration ID of this prospectively randomized trial is NCT02181101; the (retrospective) registration date was June 2014 (study start date September 2005).

Different prognostic value of circulating and disseminated tumor cells in primary breast cancer: Influence of bisphosphonate intake?

Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow (BM) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood of breast cancer patients (pts) are known to correlate with worse outcome. Here we demonstrate a different prognostic value of DTCs and CTCs and explain these findings by early clodronate intake. CTCs (n = 376 pts) were determined using the AdnaTest BreastCancer (Qiagen Hannover GmbH, Germany) and DTCs (n = 525 pts) were analyzed by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. Clodronate intake was recommended in case of DTC-positivity. CTCs were detected in 22% and DTCs in 40% of the pts, respectively. DTCs were significantly associated with nodal status (p = 0.03), grading (p = 0.01), lymphangiosis (p = 0.03), PR status (p = 0.02) and clodronate intake (p < 0.0001), no significant associations were demonstrated for CTCs. CTCs significantly correlated with reduced PFS (p = 0.0227) and negative prognostic relevance was predominantly related to G2 tumors (p = 0.044), the lobular (p = 0.024) and the triple-negative subtype (p = 0.005), HR-negative pts (p = 0.001), postmenopausal women (p = 0.013) and patients who had received radiation therapy (p = 0.018). No prognostic significance was found for DTCs. Therefore early clodronate intake can improve prognosis of breast cancer patients and CTCs might be a high risk indicator for the onset of metastasis not limited to bone metastasis.

Does primary neoadjuvant systemic therapy eradicate minimal residual disease? Analysis of disseminated and circulating tumor cells before and after therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may experience metastatic relapse despite achieving a pathologic complete response. We analyzed patients with BC before and after NACT for disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow(BM); comprehensively characterized circulating tumor cells (CTCs), including stem cell-like CTCs (slCTCs), in blood to prove the effectiveness of treatment on these cells; and correlated these findings with response to therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

CTCs (n = 135) and slCTCs (n = 91) before and after NACT were analyzed using the AdnaTest BreastCancer, AdnaTest TumorStemCell, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (QIAGEN Hannover GmbH Germany). The expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and the resistance marker excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 (ERCC1), nuclease were studied in separate single-plex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction experiments. DTCs were evaluated in 142 patients before and 165 patients after NACT using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3 for immunocytochemistry.

RESULTS

The positivity rates for DTCs, CTCs, and slCTCs were 27 %, 24 %, and 51 % before and 20 %, 8 %, and 20 % after NACT, respectively. Interestingly, 72 % of CTCs present after therapy were positive for ERCC1, and CTCs before (p = 0.005) and after NACT (p = 0.05) were significantly associated with the presence of slCTCs. Whereas no significant associations with clinical parameters were found for CTCs and slCTCs, DTCs were significantly associated with nodal status (p = 0.03) and histology (0.046) before NACT and with the immunohistochemical subtype (p = 0.02) after NACT. Univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age (p = 0.0065), tumor size before NACT (p = 0.0473), nodal status after NACT (p = 0.0137), and response to NACT (p = 0.0136) were significantly correlated with PFS, whereas age (p = 0.0162) and nodal status after NACT (p = 0.0243) were significantly associated with OS. No significant correlations were found for DTCs or any CTCs before and after therapy with regard to PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CTCs were eradicated more effectively than DTCs, CTCs detected after treatment seemed to be associated with tumor cells showing tumor stem cell characteristics as well as with resistant tumor cell populations that might indicate a worse outcome in the future. Thus, these patients might benefit from additional second-line treatment protocols including bisphosphonates for the eradication of DTCs.

Evaluation of the prognostic significance of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of primary, non-metastatic breast cancer patients after a 7-year follow-up

PURPOSE

About 30% of primary, non-metastatic breast cancer patients show a relapse of the disease years after first diagnosis, probably due to early tumor cell spread to the bone marrow (BM). For disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the BM, tumor cell dormancy, stem cell-like features and discordant receptor status of DTCs as compared to the primary tumor have been described, explaining the failure of conventional therapies. Here, we demonstrate no prognostic impact of DTCs and explain these findings by early bisphosphonate intake.

METHODS

Bone marrow aspirates of 394 patients with first diagnosis of breast cancer diagnosed between July 1997 and February 2003 were evaluated for DTCs, applying immunocytochemistry. In addition to the given therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy, oral clodronate therapy was recommended for at least 2 years for all DTC-positive patients. BM results were correlated with clinical prognostic factors and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Disseminated tumor cells were detected in 163/394 (41%) patients and significantly correlated with a histopathological lobular subtype (p = 0.032) and inversely with HER2 positivity (p = 0.01). After a median follow-up of 7 years, no significant differences with regard to OS could be demonstrated for DTC-positive patients as compared to patients with no DTCs in the BM at first diagnosis (p = 0.156).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrate no prognostic impact of DTCs, contradictory to previous findings. We speculate that the lack of impact of DTC-positivity on OS might be due to early clodronate intake, but further studies will have to prove whether the observed effect can be confirmed.

Clinical outcome with correlation to disseminated tumor cell (DTC) status after DTC-guided secondary adjuvant treatment with docetaxel in early breast cancer

PURPOSE

The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow (BM) predicts survival in early breast cancer. This study explores the use of DTCs for identification of patients insufficiently treated with adjuvant therapy so they can be offered secondary adjuvant treatment and the subsequent surrogate marker potential of DTCs for outcome determination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with early breast cancer who had completed six cycles of adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy underwent BM aspiration 2 to 3 months (BM1) and 8 to 9 months (BM2) after FEC. Presence of DTCs in BM was determined by immunocytochemistry using pan-cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies. If one or more DTCs were present at BM2, six cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2), once every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by DTC analysis 1 and 13 months after the last docetaxel infusion (after treatment). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate disease-free interval (DFI).

RESULTS

Of 1,066 patients with a DTC result at BM2 and available follow-up information (median follow-up, 71.9 months from the time of BM2), 7.2% were DTC positive. Of 72 docetaxel-treated patients analyzed for DTCs after treatment, 15 (20.8%) had persistent DTCs. Patients with remaining DTCs had markedly reduced DFI (46.7% experienced relapse) compared with patients with no DTCs after treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 7.58; 95% CI, 2.3 to 24.7). The docetaxel-treated patients with no DTCs after treatment had comparable DFI (8.8% experienced relapse) compared with those with no DTCs both at BM1 and BM2 (12.7% experienced relapse; P = .377, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

DTC status identifies high-risk patients after FEC chemotherapy, and DTC monitoring status after secondary treatment with docetaxel correlated strongly with survival. This emphasizes the potential for DTC analysis as a surrogate marker for adjuvant treatment effect in breast cancer.

Comparison of molecular and immunocytochemical methods for detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) have potential to predict the effect of adjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and immunocytochemisty (ICC), for detecting breast cancer DTCs in bone marrow (BM) from early breast cancer patients.

METHODS

We investigated a subset (n = 313) of BM samples obtained from 271 early breast cancer patients in the "Secondary Adjuvant Taxotere Treatment" (SATT)-trial. All patients in this study had node positive or intermediate/high-risk node negative non-metastatic disease. The DTCs were detected by ICC using AE1-AE3 anti-cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies. Patients with DTCs detected in their BM by ICC after standard adjuvant fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin (FEC) chemotherapy were offered docetaxel treatment. For comparison, 5 × 106 mononuclear cells from the aliquoted BM samples were also analyzed by RT-qPCR using a multimarker (MM) assay based on the tumor cell mRNA markers keratin 19 (KRT19), mammaglobin A (hMAM), and TWIST1. In the MM-assay, a sample was defined as positive for DTCs if at least one of the mRNA markers was positive.

RESULTS

The MM RT-qPCR assay identified DTCs in 124 (40%) of the 313 BM samples compared with 23/313 (7%) of the samples analyzed by ICC. The concordance between the MM RT-qPCR and ICC was 61% (Kappa value = 0.04) and twelve of the BM samples were positive by both methods. By RT-qPCR, 46/313 (15%) samples were positive for KRT19, 97/313 (31%) for TWIST1, and 3/313 (1%) for hMAM mRNA. There were no statistically significant associations between the individual mRNA markers.

CONCLUSION

The RT-qPCR based method demonstrated more DTC-positive samples than ICC. The relatively low concordance of positive DTC-status between the two different assessment methods suggests that they may be complementary. The clinical relevance of the methods will be evaluated based on future clinical outcome data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00248703.

Disseminated tumor cells as a monitoring tool for adjuvant therapy in patients with primary breast cancer

The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow (BM) of early breast cancer patients at initial surgery as well as during follow-up predicts an unfavorable outcome. This study aimed to assess whether adjuvant systemic therapy has the ability to eradicate DTC and to determine the clinical impact of DTC-persistence. Between 12 and 24 months after an initial BM aspiration during primary surgery (BMA1) a second and third bone marrow aspiration (BMA2 and BMA3, respectively) was performed. DTC were identified by immunocytochemistry (pancytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3) and cytomorphology. A total of 190 patients who were DTC-positive at BMA1 were eligible for this retrospective analysis. DTC persisted in 35 of 190 (19 %) patients at BMA2 and in 11 of 71 (16 %) patients at BMA3. DTC-persistence at BMA3 was significantly lower in patients that received adjuvant endocrine therapy (p = 0.017). At BMA2, DTC-positive patients were at an increased risk of disease recurrence (HR: 4.17, 95 % CI: 1.51-11.50, p = 0.003) and death (HR: 5.02, 95 % CI: 1.156-21.83, p = 0.031). At BMA3, the presence of DTC was associated with shorter disease free survival (HR: 3.20, 95 % CI: 1.05-9.78, p = 0.010). In conclusion, a majority of initially DTC-positive primary breast cancer patients turned negative during adjuvant treatment. As DTC-persistence predicted an adverse outcome, serial DTC-determination can identify patients that will probably benefit from additional or a switch of adjuvant therapy.

The presence and prognostic impact of apoptotic and nonapoptotic disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of primary breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy of primary breast cancer (PBC) patients offers the possibility to monitor treatment response. However, patients might have metastatic relapse despite achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR). This indicates that local response to therapy must not be representative for systemic treatment efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare local response with systemic tumor cell dissemination by determining the presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs), including apoptotic tumor cells, in the bone marrow (BM) of PBC patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

DTCs were detected by immunocytochemistry (pancytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3) and cytomorphology (DTC status). The presence of apoptotic tumor cells was determined by using the M30 antibody (M30 status). This antibody detects a neo-epitope that is expressed only during early apoptosis.

RESULTS

BM aspirates from 400 PBC patients that had completed NACT were eligible for this study. Of these, 167 (42%) patients were DTC positive (DTC status). The M30 status was investigated in 308 patients. Apoptotic (M30-positive) tumor cells were detected in 89 (29%) of these. Whereas the DTC status was not correlated (P = 0.557) to local treatment response (that is, pCR or a clinical complete/partial response), the presence of M30-positive tumor cells was significantly higher in patients that responded to therapy (P = 0.026). Additionally, DTC-positive patients were at an increased risk for disease relapse (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.15; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The presence of DTC is independent of therapy response of the primary tumor. As patients that are DTC positive after NACT have an unfavorable outcome, they might benefit from additional systemic treatment.