Impact of KRAS, BRAF and PI3KCA mutations in rectal carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery

Somatic pharmacogenomics in the treatment prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a narrative review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with fluoropyrimidines, followed by surgical excision. The newly introduced therapeutic strategies propose intensified regimens or more conservative approaches based on risk stratification algorithms that currently include clinicoradiological criteria but not molecular variables. How to better stratify patients is a burning clinical question, and pharmacogenomics may prove useful in identifying new genetic markers that could be incorporated into clinical algorithms to personalize nCRT. An emerging area could be the evaluation of somatic mutations as potential genetic markers that correlate with patient prognosis. Tumor mutations in the RAS/BRAF genes, as well as microsatellite instability (MSI) status, are currently used in treatment selection for colorectal cancer (CRC); however, their clinical value in LARC is still unclear.

AREA COVERED

This literature review discusses the relevant findings on the prognostic role of mutations in the key oncogenes RAS, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, SMAD4 and TP53, including MSI status in LARC patients treated with nCRT.

EXPERT OPINION

KRAS proved to be the most promising marker, consistently associated with poorer disease-free survival and overall survival. Therefore, KRAS could be a good candidate for integration into the risk stratification algorithm to develop a personalized treatment.

The prognostic effect of PNN in digestive tract cancers and its correlation with the tumor immune landscape in colon adenocarcinoma

Background

The present study investigated the expression, mutation, and methylation profile of PNN and its prognostic value in digestive tract cancers. The disparities in signaling pathways and the immune landscape in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) based on PNN expression were specifically explored.

Methods

The expression, mutation, methylation levels of PNN, and survival data in esophageal cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, COAD, and rectal adenocarcinoma were evaluated using several bioinformatic databases. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed to investigate the enriched biological functions and pathways in COAD. Several acknowledged bioinformatic algorithms were employed to assess the correlation between PNN expression and the tumor immune landscape in COAD.

Results

PNN was upregulated and remarkably related to tumor stage in digestive tract cancers. High expression of PNN was positively associated with poor progression‐free survival and overall survival time, specifically in COAD. PNN expression was identified as an independent prognostic factor in COAD. GO and GSEA analyses revealed that PNN participates in multiple biological processes underlying carcinogenicity in COAD. Further investigation showed that PNN expression was significantly associated with tumor‐infiltrating immune cells, immune cell functions, and several immune checkpoints in COAD. The PNN low expression group had a lower tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score and a higher immunophenoscore (IPS), indicating a better response to immunotherapy.

Conclusion

PNN was highly expressed in digestive tract cancers and could act as an independent prognostic factor and a response predictor for immunotherapy in COAD.

KRAS mutation is predictive for poor prognosis in rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between KRAS mutation and prognosis in rectal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Literature was searched in the databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Ovid), and MEDLINE (PubMed) from inception to December 16, 2020. The keywords "rectal cancer" or "rectal carcinoma" or "rectal adenocarcinoma" and "KRAS" and "neoadjuvant" were used for preliminary literature retrieval. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated for the KRAS mutation and clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), pathologic complete remission (pCR), downstaging of T stages and tumor stages, as well as improvements in tumor regression grading (TRG). Publication bias was assessed by the funnel plots.

RESULTS

A total of 16 articles were included for eligibility. The total number of patients was 3674 cases, with an incidence of KRAS gene mutation of 36.6% (1346/3674). Meta-analysis showed that the pooled OR for KRAS mutation on OS was 1.33 (95%CI: 113-1.56). Consistently, results also indicated that the KRAS mutant was related to the poor DFS (pooled OR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.19-2.02). However, KRAS mutation is not related to the PCR (pooled OR= 0.71, 95%CI: 0.44-1.14), downstaging in T stages (pooled OR= 0.66, 95%CI: 0.42-1.06), tumor stages (pooled OR= 1.18, 95%CI: 0.78-1.78, I2=12.9%), as well as improvement in TRG grades (pooled OR= 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59-1.20).

CONCLUSION

KRAS mutation is a predictor for the poor prognosis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer, but it is not related to the responses of tumors after treatment.

Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Methylation and Prediction of Response to NeoadjuvantTherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The treatment for locally advanced rectal carcinomas (LARC) is based on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery, which results in pathological complete response (pCR) in up to 30% of patients. Since epigenetic changes may influence response to therapy, we aimed to identify DNA methylation markers predictive of pCR in LARC patients treated with nCRT. We used high-throughput DNA methylation analysis of 32 treatment-naïve LARC biopsies and five normal rectal tissues to explore the predictive value of differentially methylated (DM) CpGs. External validation was carried out with The Cancer Genome Atlas-Rectal Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-READ 99 cases). A classifier based on three-CpGs DM (linked to OBSL1, GPR1, and INSIG1 genes) was able to discriminate pCR from incomplete responders with high sensitivity and specificity. The methylation levels of the selected CpGs confirmed the predictive value of our classifier in 77 LARCs evaluated by bisulfite pyrosequencing. Evaluation of external datasets (TCGA-READ, GSE81006, GSE75546, and GSE39958) reproduced our results. As the three CpGs were mapped near to regulatory elements, we performed an integrative analysis in regions associated with predicted cis-regulatory elements. A positive and inverse correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression was found in two CpGs. We propose a novel predictive tool based on three CpGs potentially useful for pretreatment screening of LARC patients and guide the selection of treatment modality.

High EREG Expression Is Predictive of Better Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

A great proportion of patients with rectal cancer initially present with locally advanced disease and can potentially benefit from neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for downstaging before surgery. However, risk and clinical outcome stratification remain a great challenge. We aimed to find the potential biomarker to predict the effect of neoadjuvant CCRT on rectal cancer.

METHODS

We identified epiregulin (EREG) as the most significant predictive marker for neoadjuvant CCRT response from the published rectal cancer transcriptome data set GSE35452. We collected 172 biopsy specimens from rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant CCRT followed by radical proctectomy, performed EREG immunohistochemistry, and analyzed the H-scores. We further examined the correlations between the expression level of EREG and clinicopathological features, tumor regression grade, and survival, including disease-specific survival (DSS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MeFS).

RESULTS

High EREG expression was significantly related to early pretreatment (pre-Tx) and posttreatment (post-Tx) tumor status (T1, T2, p = 0.047 and p < 0.001), pre-Tx and post-Tx negative nodal status (N0, p < 0.001 and p = 0.004), less vascular and perineurial invasion (p = 0.015 and p = 0.023), and higher tumor regression grade (p < 0.001). In the survival analysis, high EREG expression was significantly associated with better DSS (p < 0.0001), LRFS (p = 0.0004), and MeFS (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, high EREG expression remained prognostically significant for better DSS (p = 0.003; hazard ratio: 5.599).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that EREG is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant CCRT.

Relationship between KRAS mutation and diffusion weighted imaging in colorectal liver metastases; Preliminary study

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate whether there are any differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) according to Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene mutation status.

METHOD

In this retrospective study, we included 22 patients with 65 liver metastases due to colorectal cancer and performed KRAS gene mutation tests. We divided the patients into two groups as KRAS mutation positive (+) (n:10, 30 lesions) and the wild-type group (n:12, 35 lesions). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare ADC and ADC mean values of the two groups. In addition, we performed receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to discriminate the two groups in terms of their ADC and ADCmean values.

RESULTS

The ADC and ADCmean values were found to be statistically significantly lower in the KRAS (+) group compared to the wild-type group. ROC curve analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in terms of ADC and ADCmean with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.680 and 0.760, respectively. The cut-off values for ADC and ADCmean were 986 × 10^-6 mm²/s and 823 × 10^-6 mm²/s, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the lower ADC and ADCmean values of CRLM are associated with presence of KRAS mutation. ADC and ADCmean values derived from liver metastases due to the colorectal cancer can be used to differentiate KRAS mutation status.

Analysis of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in a large prospective series of locally advanced rectal cancer patients

Little information is available on the clinical significance of cancer-related genes such as KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 in nonmetastatic rectal cancer. We investigated mutations of these genes in a large prospective series of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who were recruited into two phase II trials. Mutational analyses were performed with diagnostically validated methods including polymerase chain reaction, capillary electrophoresis single-strand conformational analysis, Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing. Associations between single or multiple gene mutations and clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were explored. Of these 269, 210 (78%) patients were assessable. Mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 occurred in 43, 9, 4, 9 and 60% of patients, respectively. Concordance between paired biopsy and resection specimens was 82% for KRAS, 95% for NRAS, 99% for BRAF, 96% for PIK3CA and 63% for TP53. TP53 mutations were associated with extramural venous invasion on baseline MRI (78% vs. 65%, p = 0.04), poor pathological tumour regression (23% vs. 36%, p = 0.05) and a trend toward a worse 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 60% vs. 74%, HR 1.59, p = 0.06). Patients with tumours harbouring mutation of TP53 and either KRAS or NRAS (32%) had a worse 5-year PFS than those with TP53/KRAS/NRAS wild-type tumours (54% vs. 72%, HR 1.75, p = 0.02). In univariate analysis, BRAF mutation predicted poor 5-year overall survival only among patients treated without cetuximab (20% vs. 73%, HR 3.29, p = 0.03). This is one of the largest biomarker studies in a prospective, largely homogeneous, LARC population. Our findings are hypothesis generating and require validation in independent series.

Circulating Biomarkers for Response Prediction of Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) is highly variable. In fact, it has been estimated that only about 21 % of patients show pathologic Complete Response (pCR) after therapy, while in most of the patients a partial or incomplete tumour regression is observed. Consequently, patients with a priori chemoradioresistant tumour should not receive the treatment, which is associated with substantial adverse effects and does not guarantee any clinical benefit. For Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients (LARC), a standardized neoadjuvant treatment protocol is applied, the identification and the usefulness of prognostic or predictive biomarkers can improve the antitumoural treatment strategy, modifying the sequence, dose, and combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical resection. For these reasons, a growing number of studies are actually focussed on the discovery and investigation of new predictive biomarkers of response to pCRT. In this review, we have selected the most recent literature (2012-2017) regarding the employment of blood-based biomarkers potentially predicting pCR in LARC patients and we have critically discussed them to highlight their real clinical benefit and the current limitations of the proposed methodological approaches.

Magnetic Resonance-Based Texture Analysis Differentiating KRAS Mutation Status in Rectal Cancer

Purpose

Mutation of the Kirsten Ras (KRAS) oncogene is present in 30%-40% of colorectal cancers and has prognostic significance in rectal cancer. In this study, we examined the ability of radiomics features extracted from T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images to differentiate between tumors with mutant KRAS and wild-type KRAS.

Materials and Methods

Sixty patients with primary rectal cancer (25 with mutant KRAS, 35 with wild-type KRAS) were retrospectively enrolled. Texture analysis was performed in all regions of interest on MR images, which were manually segmented by two independent radiologists. We identified potentially useful imaging features using the two-tailed t test and used them to build a discriminant model with a decision tree to estimate whether KRAS mutation had occurred.

Results

Three radiomic features were significantly associated with KRAS mutational status (p < 0.05). The mean (and standard deviation) skewness with gradient filter value was significantly higher in the mutant KRAS group than in the wild-type group (2.04±0.94 vs. 1.59±0.69). Higher standard deviations for medium texture (SSF3 and SSF4) were able to differentiate mutant KRAS (139.81±44.19 and 267.12±89.75, respectively) and wild-type KRAS (114.55±29.30 and 224.78±62.20). The final decision tree comprised three decision nodes and four terminal nodes, two of which designated KRAS mutation. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the decision tree was 84%, 80%, and 81.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

Using MR-based texture analysis, we identified three imaging features that could differentiate mutant from wild-type KRAS. T2-weighted images could be used to predict KRAS mutation status preoperatively in patients with rectal cancer.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 targeting improves sensitivity to radiation in BRAF V600E colorectal carcinoma cells

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative chemoradiation is currently the standard of care in locally advanced rectal carcinoma, even though a subset of rectal tumors does not achieve major clinically meaningful responses upon neoadjuvant chemoradiation. At present, no molecular biomarkers are available to predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation and select resistant tumors willing more intense therapeutic strategies. Thus, BRAF mutational status was investigated for its role in favoring resistance to radiation in colorectal carcinoma cell lines and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 as a target to improve radiosensitivity in BRAF V600E colorectal tumor cells.

METHODS

Colony-forming assay and apoptotic rates were evaluated to compare the sensitivity of different colon carcinoma cell lines to ionizing radiation and their radiosensitivity upon exposure to BRAF and/or cyclin-dependent kinase 1 inhibitory/silencing strategies. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 expression/subcellular distribution was studied by immunoblot analysis.

RESULTS

Colon carcinoma BRAF V600E HT29 cells exhibited poor response to radiation compared to BRAF wild-type COLO320 and HCT116 cells. Interestingly, neither radiosensitizing doses of 5-fluoruracil nor BRAF inhibition/silencing significantly improved radiosensitivity in HT29 cells. Of note, poor response to radiation correlated with upregulation/relocation of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 in mitochondria. Consistently, cyclin-dependent kinase 1 inhibition/silencing as well as its targeting, through inhibition of HSP90 quality control pathway, significantly inhibited the clonogenic ability and increased apoptotic rates in HT29 cells upon exposure to radiation.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that BRAF V600E colorectal carcinoma cells are poorly responsive to radiation, and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 represents a target to improve radiosensitivity in BRAF V600E colorectal tumor cells.

Impact of RAS/BRAF mutation status in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Our sincere hope is to establish the predictive factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response and provide patients with greater certainty regarding treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the response to NAC and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) according to their RAS/BRAF mutation status.

METHODS

Data on 57 patients with LARC who received NAC between 2009 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were classified into two groups based on their mutation status: wild-type in both RAS and BRAF (WT) or mutant-type in either RAS or BRAF (MT).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were classified as WT, and the remaining 34 patients were MT. Histological response to NAC was similar in both groups. In responders, the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was better compared with the non-responders (92 and 66%, respectively). In the WT group, the 3-year RFS was 95% which was significantly better than that in the MT group (59%, p = 0.011). The MT group was further subdivided into the following 2 groups by the pathological response; the MT responders (n = 10) and MT non-responders (n = 24). The 3-year RFS was 50% in the MT non-responders, which was significantly worse compared to that in the remaining patients (92%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RAS/BRAF mutations did not affect the response to NAC. However, the RFS was likely to be poor for those in the MT group who did not achieve favorable pathological response. In contrast, the RFS was favorable in the WT group regardless of the pathological response.

Molecular spectrum of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, and APC somatic gene mutations in Arab patients with colorectal cancer: determination of frequency and distribution pattern

BACKGROUND

The frequency rates of mutations such as KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA in colorectal cancer (CRC) differ among populations. The aim of this study was to assess mutation frequencies in the Arab population and determine their correlations with certain clinicopathological features.

METHODS

Arab patients from the Arab Gulf region and a population of age- and sex-matched Western patients with CRC whose tumors were evaluated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) were identified and retrospectively reviewed. The mutation rates of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, and APC were recorded, along with clinicopathological features. Other somatic mutation and their rates were also identified. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the association between mutation status and clinical features.

RESULTS

A total of 198 cases were identified; 99 Arab patients and 99 Western patients. Fifty-two point seven percent of Arab patients had stage IV disease at initial presentation, 74.2% had left-sided tumors. Eighty-nine point two percent had tubular adenocarcinoma and 10.8% had mucinous adenocarcinoma. The prevalence rates of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, APC, SMAD, FBXW7 mutations in Arab population were 44.4%, 4%, 4%, 13.1%, 52.5%, 27.3%, 2% and 3% respectively. Compared to 48.4%, 4%, 4%, 12.1%, 47.5%, 24.2%, 11.1% and 0% respectively in matched Western population. Associations between these mutations and patient clinicopathological features were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to report comprehensive hotspot mutations using NGS in Arab patients with CRC. The frequency of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, TP53, APC and PIK3CA mutations were similar to reported frequencies in Western population except SMAD4 that had a lower frequency and higher frequency of FBXW7 mutation.

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in rectal cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cause of death worldwide. Approximately 30 % of all CRC occurs in the rectum. Improvements in survival rates were achieved thanks to multimodal therapy, combining surgery and chemoradiation. Nevertheless, the prognosis of patients suffering from rectal cancer (RC) remains poor. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) regulate tumor immune response. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression of PD-L1 in RC pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy and evaluate PD-L1 as a biomarker and potential target for therapy.

Methods

In all, 29 patients with RC treated at the Medical University Vienna who received preoperative chemoradiation were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Expression of PD-L1 was investigated by immunohistochemistry with two different anti-PD-L1 antibodies.

Results

No PD-L1 expression on cancer cells could be observed in all 29 cases in the specimens before chemoradiation as well as in the surgical specimens after neoadjuvant therapy. In one of the two staining methods performed, five (17.24 %) post-chemoradiation cases showed faint lymphohistiocytic staining.

Conclusion

No expression of PD-L1 in RC cells before and after chemoradiation was found in our collective of 29 patients. Further investigations to evaluate the role of PD-L1 as a potential therapeutic target in RC are urgently needed.

Prognostic value of 5-microRNA based signature in T2-T3N0 colon cancer

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage T2-T3N0 colon cancer (CC) is controversial and there are currently no reliable factors allowing for individual selection of patients with high risk of relapse for such therapy. We searched for microRNA-based signature with prognostic significance in this group. We assessed by qRT-PCR expression of 754 microRNAs (miRNAs) in tumour samples from 85 stage pT2-3N0 CC patients treated with surgery alone. MiRNA expression was compared between two groups of patients: 40 and 45 patients who did and did not develop distant metastases after resection, respectively. Additionally, miRNA expression was compared between CC and normal colon mucosa samples and between the mismatch repair (MMR) competent and deficient tumours. Low expression of miR-1300 and miR-939 was significantly correlated with shorter distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in Cox univariate analysis (p.adjusted = 0.049). The expression signature of five miRNAs (miR-1296, miR-135b, miR-539, miR-572 and miR-185) was found to be prognostic [p = 1.28E−07, HR 8.4 (95 % CI: 3.81–18.52)] for DMFS and cross-validated in a leave-one-out analysis, with the sensitivity and specificity of 74 and 78 %, respectively. The expression of miR-592 was significantly associated with the MMR status (p.adjusted <0.01). The expression of several novel miRNAs were found to be tumour specific, e.g. miR-888, miR-523, miR-18b, miR-302a, miR-423-5p, miR-582-3p (p < 0.05). We developed a miRNA expression signature that may be predictive for the risk of distant relapse in early stage CC and confirmed previously reported association between miR-592 expression and MMR status.

Organ preservation in rectal cancer: current status and future perspectives

With the introduction of population screening initiatives, more patients may be amenable to local, transanal excision (LE) of early-stage rectal cancer. The most important drawback of LE is the risk of understaging node-positive disease. The most powerful predictors of node-positive disease are lymphatic invasion, submucosal invasion depth and width, tumor budding and poor differentiation. Therefore, LE should be reserved for low-risk T1 tumors in those reluctant or unable to undergo major surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by LE for T2 tumors allows adequate local control, and is currently being compared with anterior resection alone in randomized trials. A mere watchful waiting approach has been proposed in clinical complete responders to chemoradiation. However, given the very poor accuracy of current imaging modalities to predict a true pathological complete response, this strategy should not be offered outside of well-controlled trials.

KRAS mutation profile differences between rectosigmoid localized adenocarcinomas and colon adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer has a heterogeneous nature that is influenced by the tumour site. Many improvements have been made in identifying and characterizing the genetic alterations between colon and rectal cancers. However, there is not enough information about KRAS mutational differences between rectosigmoid and colon cancers arising elsewhere in the large bowel. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the frequency of KRAS genetic alterations between rectosigmoid cancers and colon cancers.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were included in this study. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue sections. KRAS mutation analysis which was designed to detect the seven most common KRAS gene mutations (Gly12Ala, Gly12Asp, Gly12Arg, Gly12Cys, Gly12Ser, Gly12Val and Gly13Asp) was performed. Chi-square test was used to test the association between mutation status and other variables.

RESULTS

This study represents the first KRAS mutational results from Turkish rectosigmoid cancer patients. The KRAS mutation frequency of rectosigmoid tumours is higher (34.3%, 12/35) than that of colon-localized tumours (30.6%, 15/49). However, there is no significant correlation between the KRAS mutation status and tumour location (rectosigmoid and colon).

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutation analysis has a predictive and prognostic value in identifying tumours that may be resistant to treatment. Our study shows that differences in the biological behaviour of rectosigmoid and colon cancers should be considered. This finding highlights the importance of personalized cancer management, which could be assisted by cancer genotyping tools.

Molecular spectrum of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA gene mutation: determination of frequency, distribution pattern in Indian colorectal carcinoma

Molecular evaluation of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation has become an important part in colorectal carcinoma evaluation, and their alterations may determine the therapeutic response to anti-EGFR therapy. The current study demonstrates the evaluation of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation using direct sequencing in 204 samples. The frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations was 23.5, 9.8, and 5.9 %, respectively. Five different substitution mutations at KRAS codon 12 (G12S, G12D, G12A, G12V, and G12C) and one substitution type at codon 13 (G13D) were observed. KRAS mutations were significantly higher in patients who were >50 years, and were associated with moderate/poorly differentiated tumors and adenocarcinomas. All mutations in BRAF gene were of V600E type, which were frequent in patients who were ≤ 50 years. Unlike KRAS mutations, BRAF mutations were more frequent in well-differentiated tumors and right-sided tumors. PIK3CA-E545K was the most recurrent mutation while other mutations detected were T544I, Q546R, H1047R, G1049S, and D1056N. No significant association of PIK3CA mutation with age, tumor differentiation, location, and other parameters was noted. No concomitant mutation of KRAS and BRAF mutations was observed, while, interestingly, five cases showed concurrent mutation of KRAS and PIK3CA mutations. In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the PIK3CA mutation in Indian CRC patients. The frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA was similar to worldwide reports. Furthermore, identification of molecular markers has unique strengths, and can provide insights into the pathogenic process and help optimize personalized prevention and therapy.

Epigenetic status of LINE-1 predicts clinical outcome in early-stage rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical prognostic value of methylation of two non-coding repeat sequences, long interspersed element 1 (LINE-1) and Alu, in rectal tumour tissues. In addition to DNA methylation, expression of histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K9Ac was studied in this patient cohort.

METHODS

LINE-1 and Alu methylation were assessed in DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. A pilot (30 tumour and 25 normal tissues) and validation study (189 tumour and 53 normal tissues) were performed. Histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K9Ac were immunohistochemically stained on tissue microarrays of the study cohort.

RESULTS

In early-stage rectal cancer (stage I-II), hypomethylation of LINE-1 was an independent clinical prognostic factor, showing shorter patient survival (P=0.014; HR: 4.6) and a higher chance of tumour recurrence (P=0.001; HR: 9.6). Alu methylation did not show any significant correlation with clinical parameters, suggesting an active role of LINE-1 in tumour development. Expression of H3K27me3 (silencing gene expression) and H3K9Ac (activating gene expression) in relation to methylation status of LINE-1 and Alu supported this specific role of LINE-1 methylation.

CONCLUSION

The epigenetic status of LINE-1, but not of Alu, is prognostic in rectal cancer, indicating an active role for LINE-1 in determining clinical outcome.

The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers

Radiotherapy has a longstanding and well-defined role in the treatment of resectable rectal cancer to reduce the historically high risk of local recurrence. In more advanced borderline or unresectable cases, where the circumferential resection margin (CRM) is breached or threatened according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), despite optimized local multimodality treatment and the gains achieved by modern high quality total mesorectal excision (TME), at least half the patients fail to achieve sufficient downstaging with current schedules. Many do not achieve an R0 resection. In less locally advanced cases, even if local control is achieved, this confers only a small impact on distant metastases and a significant proportion of patients (30-40%) still subsequently develop metastatic disease. In fact, distant metastases have now become the predominant cause of failure in rectal cancer. Therefore, increasing the intensity and efficacy of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targetted agents seems an appealing strategy to explore-with the aim of enhancing curative resection rates and improving distant control and survival. However, to date, we lack validated biomarkers for these biological agents apart from wild-type KRAS. For cetuximab, the appearance of an acneiform rash is associated with response, but low levels of magnesium appear more controversial. There are no molecular biomarkers for bevacizumab. Although some less invasive clinical markers have been proposed for bevacizumab, such as circulating endothelial cells (CECS), circulating levels of VEGF and the development of overt hypertension, these biomarkers have not been validated and are observed to emerge only after a trial of the agent. We also lack a simple method of ongoing monitoring of 'on target' effects of these biological agents, which could determine and pre-empt the development of resistance, prior to radiological and clinical assessessments or even molecular imaging. These shortcomings probably explain our current relative lack of success in the arena of combining these agents with chemoradiation.