Is [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography of value in the management of patients with craniofacial bone sarcomas undergoing neo-adjuvant treatment?

A retrospective case-control study for the comparison of 5-year survival rates: the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in craniofacial bone sarcoma in adults

Background

The impact of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of craniofacial bone sarcomas has not been clarified. This study aimed to assess whether survival outcomes differed between patients who underwent adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective search for adult patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms of the craniofacial bones (International Classification of Diseases 10 codes C41.0-C41.1), within the past 20 years from the access date 28 April 2022, was conducted using the TriNetX network (TriNetX, Cambridge, MA, USA). Cohort I included patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and cohort II included patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A refined search for individuals that received common chemotherapeutic agents, such as methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, was conducted and patients were assigned to cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy) and cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Following matching for age and sex, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, and risk ratio, odds ratio (OR), and hazard ratio were calculated.

Results

Patients were assigned to two cohorts, with 181 patients each after matching. In cohorts I and II, 55 and 41 patients died, respectively. No significant differences were found between the two cohorts regarding the 5-year survival probability (I: 59.87% versus II: 68.45%; p = 0.076; log-rank test), or the risk of dying (I: 0.304 versus II: 0.227; risk difference: 0.077; p = 0.096). The risk analysis before matching for age and sex showed a significant survival benefit in cohort II (OR: 1.586; p = 0.0295; risk difference: 0.093). After a refined query to identify patients treated with methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, the two cohorts included 47 patients, respectively. In cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy), 19 patients died, whereas 12 patients died in cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) within 5 years after diagnosis. Further analysis indicated a greater survival in cohort B, but the survival probability between the cohorts did not differ significantly (A: 43.55% versus B: 54.49%; p = 0.171).

Conclusion

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival rates in patients with surgically treated craniofacial bone sarcomas. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, randomized controlled studies are required to derive treatment recommendations.

Systemic treatment for primary malignant sarcomas arising in craniofacial bones

Introduction

Craniofacial bones may be the site of origin of various sarcomas. We review the various malignancies affecting this region of the body and attempt to put systemic treatment approaches into perspective.

Material and methods

Non-systematic literature review

Results

Conventional types of osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma are the most frequent bone sarcomas occurring in craniofacial region, but variants may occur. The tumors’ biologies and the resulting treatment strategies vary distinctly. As a general rule, local control remains paramount regardless of histology. The efficacy of antineoplastic chemotherapy varies by type of malignancy. It is clearly indicated in Ewing sarcoma and related tumors, potentially of benefit in high-grade osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, dedifferentiated and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, and of no proven benefit in the others.

Conclusions

Various histologies demand various and distinct treatment approaches, with local control remaining paramount in all. The efficacy of systemic treatments varies by type of tumor. Prospective trials would help in all of these to better define systemic treatment strategies.

SELNET clinical practice guidelines for bone sarcoma

Bone sarcoma are infrequent diseases, representing < 0.2% of all adult neoplasms. A multidisciplinary management within reference centers for sarcoma, with discussion of the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies within an expert multidisciplinary tumour board, is essential for these patients, given its heterogeneity and low frequency. This approach leads to an improvement in patient's outcome, as demonstrated in several studies. The Sarcoma European Latin-American Network (SELNET), aims to improve clinical outcome in sarcoma care, with a special focus in Latin-American countries. These Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) have been developed and agreed by a multidisciplinary expert group (including medical and radiation oncologist, surgical oncologist, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologist, pathologist, molecular biologist and representatives of patients advocacy groups) of the SELNET consortium, and are conceived to provide the standard approach to diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of bone sarcoma patients in the Latin-American context.

PET with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose/Computed Tomography in the Management of Pediatric Sarcoma

The role for PET with fludeoxyglucose F 18 (¹⁸F-FDG PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the management of pediatric sarcomas continues to be controversial. The literature supports a role for PET/CT in the staging and surveillance of certain specific pediatric sarcoma subtypes; however, the data are less clear regarding whether PET/CT can be used as a biomarker for prognostication. Despite the interest in using this imaging modality in the management of pediatric sarcomas, most studies are limited by retrospective design and small sample size. Additional data are necessary to fully understand how best to use ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric sarcoma management.

Current questions in bone sarcomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma, the most common primary bone tumours in young people, are curable in most patients. However, these tumours remain a significant challenge due to the complexity and intensity of treatment and its long-term morbidity and the significant proportion of patients in whom treatment is unsuccessful. This review addresses questions about current management and emerging therapeutic targets for patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chondrosarcoma, the commonest bone sarcoma but more common in older patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The largest collaborative international study in osteosarcoma, EURAMOS-1 determined that treatment of patients with resectable disease should not be altered on basis of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In view of little improvement in outcome being evident in recent years, novel therapeutic approaches are required. Putative targets and clinical trials of novel agents are discussed, including emerging targets such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibition in Ewing sarcoma and chondrosarcoma, respectively. Newer radiotherapy techniques including proton beam and particle ion therapy may be important for local tumour control in selected patients.

SUMMARY

Collaborative studies are essential to answer current questions and investigate novel therapies in these malignancies to improve outcome and quality of life for patients.

Future Perspective of the Application of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-MR Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) is the imaging method of choice in sarcoma patients. PET may help in diagnosis, grading, staging, biopsy guidance, monitoring response to therapy, restaging for recurrence, and prognosis. 18F-FDG-PET/MRI combines the higher tissue contrast of MRI in the study of soft-tissue lesions and the peculiarities of PET imaging that allow the characterization of tissues. The use of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in these patients has reduces the radiation dose, which is of great importance, particularly in children. Data support the routine use of 18F-FDG-PET either using CT or MRI in patients with sarcoma.

Pediatric Musculoskeletal Imaging: The Indications for and Applications of PET/Computed Tomography

The use of PET/computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation and management of children, adolescents, and young adults continues to expand. The principal tracer used is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and the principal indication is oncology, particularly musculoskeletal neoplasms. The purpose of this article is to review the common applications of PET/CT for imaging of musculoskeletal issues in pediatrics and to introduce the use of PET/CT for nononcologic issues, such as infectious/inflammatory disorders, and review the use of 18F-sodium fluoride in trauma and sports-related injuries.

Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, and Chordoma

Osteosarcoma (OS), chondrosarcoma, and chordoma are characterized by multiple challenges to the investigator, clinician, and patient. One consequence of their rarity among sarcomas, as well as their biologic and clinical heterogeneity, is that management guidelines are inadequate to inform the range of individual patient-treatment decisions from diagnosis, approaches to surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, treatment of recurrence, palliative care, and quality of survivorship. Of high-grade sarcomas, OSs are among the most curable, with more than two-thirds of patients with localized disease likely to achieve long-term survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate with intercalated surgery is the standard of care for resectable OS in those younger than 40 years. Outcomes for OS presenting with unresectable metastases or recurrent disease, or in those older than 40 years are generally poor. Overall results have improved little for all patients with OS, and new treatments are needed. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of management for chondrosarcoma and chordoma. However, the application of new biologic insights to therapeutic development indicates that improved treatments may soon be routine for patients with chondrosarcoma and chordoma for whom surgery alone is inadequate. For all these uncommon diseases, patients should be offered specialist expert care delivered by experienced multidisciplinary teams in high-volume centers.

The Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Pediatric Sarcoma

Considerable debate remains regarding how best to incorporate ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT into clinical practice for pediatric sarcomas. Although there is a clear role for ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in staging pediatric sarcoma, the value of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in prognostication for pediatric sarcomas remains unclear. In osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma, ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT may be most useful in the identification of skeletal metastases, where the literature consistently suggests that it has improved sensitivity and specificity as compared to bone scintigraphy. The role of the imaging modality in the identification of pulmonary metastatic disease is less clear. Further controversy exists regarding the use of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in predicting outcome. Several studies, particularly in osteosarcoma, suggest changes in the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV_max) that can predict histologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as overall outcome. Conversely, studies are conflicting regarding the use of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT as a prognostic tool in Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. The role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas is unknown at this time. Although most studies have been small and retrospective, in certain histologic subtypes, there is a clear role for the use of this imaging modality. Additional prospective and larger studies are needed to fully determine how best to incorporate ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT into treatment regimens for pediatric sarcomas in the future.

Head and neck sarcomas: A single institute series

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas are tumours of mesenchymal origin, accounting for 1% of all malignancies.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 107 head and neck sarcoma cases, treated over a period of thirteen years.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients had with craniofacial bone sarcomas (BSs) (male: 33; female: 21) with high grade osteosarcoma being the most predominant type. The soft tissue sarcomas (STS) (53 patients; male: 28, female: 25) were histologically diverse with rhabdomyosarcomas and myxofibrosarcomas being the predominant types. The majority of BSs were managed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, whereas in STSs treatment included predominantly surgery followed by radiotherapy. Overall survival estimates were 79% at 2years and 64% at 5years (mean follow-up period was 48months).

CONCLUSIONS

The mesenchymal origin of sarcomas, the pattern of disease spread and the different extent of cancellous bone infiltration in contrast to epithelial tumours, dictate distinct principles for surgical clearance.

UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas

This document is an update of the British Sarcoma Group guidelines published in 2010. The aim is to provide a reference standard for the clinical care of patients in the UK with bone sarcomas. Recent recommendations by the European Society of Medical Oncology, The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have been incorporated, and the literature since 2010 reviewed. The standards represent a consensus amongst British Sarcoma Group members in 2015. It is acknowledged that these guidelines will need further updates as care evolves. The key recommendations are that bone pain or a palpable mass should always lead to further investigation and that patients with clinico-radiological findings suggestive of a primary bone tumour at any site in the skeleton should be referred to a specialist centre and managed by a fully accredited bone sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Treatment recommendations are provided for the major tumour types and for localised, metastatic and recurrent disease. Follow up schedules are suggested.