Phenotypic alterations in breast cancer cells overexpressing the nuclear receptor co-activator AIB1

Intrinsically Disordered SRC-3/AIB1 Protein Undergoes Homeostatic Nuclear Extrusion by Nuclear Budding While Ectopic Expression Induces Nucleophagy

SRC-3/AIB1 (Amplified in Breast Cancer-1) is a nuclear receptor coactivator for the estrogen receptor in breast cancer cells. It is also an intrinsically disordered protein when not engaged with transcriptional binding partners and degraded upon transcriptional coactivation. Given the amplified expression of SRC-3 in breast cancers, the objective of this study was to determine how increasing SRC-3 protein levels are regulated in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. We found that endogenous SRC-3 was expelled from the nucleus in vesicle-like spheres under normal growth conditions suggesting that this form of nuclear exclusion of SRC-3 is a homeostatic mechanism for regulating nuclear SRC-3 protein. Only SRC-3 not associated with CREB-binding protein (CBP) was extruded from the nucleus. We found that overexpression in MCF-7 cells results in aneuploid senescence and cell death with frequent formation of nuclear aggregates which were consistently juxtaposed to perinuclear microtubules. Transfected SRC-3 was SUMOylated and caused redistribution of nuclear promyelocytic leukemia (PML) bodies and perturbation of the nuclear membrane lamin B1, hallmarks of nucleophagy. Increased SRC-3 protein-induced autophagy and resulted in SUMO-1 localization to the nuclear membrane and formation of protrusions variously containing SRC-3 and chromatin. Aspects of SRC-3 overexpression and toxicity were recapitulated following treatment with clinically relevant agents that stabilize SRC-3 in breast cancer cells. We conclude that amplified SRC-3 levels have major impacts on nuclear protein quality control pathways and may mark cancer cells for sensitivity to protein stabilizing therapeutics.

An Approach to Greater Specificity for Glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoid steroids are among the most prescribed drugs each year. Nonetheless, the many undesirable side effects, and lack of selectivity, restrict their greater usage. Research to increase glucocorticoid specificity has spanned many years. These efforts have been hampered by the ability of glucocorticoids to both induce and repress gene transcription and also by the lack of success in defining any predictable properties that control glucocorticoid specificity. Correlations of transcriptional specificity have been observed with changes in steroid structure, receptor and chromatin conformation, DNA sequence for receptor binding, and associated cofactors. However, none of these studies have progressed to the point of being able to offer guidance for increased specificity. We summarize here a mathematical theory that allows a novel and quantifiable approach to increase selectivity. The theory applies to all three major actions of glucocorticoid receptors: induction by agonists, induction by antagonists, and repression by agonists. Simple graphical analysis of competition assays involving any two factors (steroid, chemical, peptide, protein, DNA, etc.) yields information (1) about the kinetically described mechanism of action for each factor at that step where the factor acts in the overall reaction sequence and (2) about the relative position of that step where each factor acts. These two pieces of information uniquely provide direction for increasing the specificity of glucocorticoid action. Consideration of all three modes of action indicate that the most promising approach for increased specificity is to vary the concentrations of those cofactors/pharmaceuticals that act closest to the observed end point. The potential for selectivity is even greater when varying cofactors/pharmaceuticals in conjunction with a select class of antagonists.

Steroid receptor coactivator AIB1 in endometrial carcinoma, hyperplasia and normal endometrium: Correlation with clinicopathologic parameters and biomarkers

Members of the p160 steroid receptor cofactor family, including AIB1 (Amplified in Breast Cancer 1) (also known as SRC-3/RAC3/ACTR/pCIP/TRAM-1), are of interest in endometrial carcinoma as they affect the function of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR). Since it is feasible that alterations in the expression levels of coregulators can either augment ER activity or reduce the ability of PR to oppose ER action in endometrial cancers, our primary aim was to analyze expression of the AIB1 protein in endometrial carcinoma, carcinoma-associated complex atypical hyperplasia, and carcinoma-associated normal endometrium using immunohistochemistry and tissue microarrays. Expression of AIB1 was compared with other biomarkers and clinicopathologic parameters. We also tested AIB1 expression in non-carcinoma associated hyperplastic, normal secretory and proliferative endometrium to determine baseline AIB1 levels. In endometrial carcinoma, there is a higher expression of AIB1 compared to carcinoma-associated complex atypical hyperplasia (0.007) or carcinoma-associated normal endometrium (<0.001). AIB1 expression correlates with older age (P = 0.003), peri- or postmenopausal status (P = 0.002) and a higher grade of carcinomas (P = 0.04). There were no differences in the expression of additional steroid hormone receptor co-activators (SRC-1 and p300/CBP) and the co-repressor SMRT between histologic categories. AIB1 expression correlated with ER (r = 0.30, P = 0.006). The strongest correlation was between ER and PR-B isoform nuclear expression (r = 0.52, P < 0.0001). AIB1 levels were higher in non-carcinoma associated normal and hyperplastic endometrium compared to carcinoma-associated complex atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma-associated normal endometrium, and were the highest in normal secretory endometrium. In conclusion, high AIB1 expression in endometrial carcinoma is associated with parameters of poor prognosis. We propose that when AIB1 is overexpressed in endometrial carcinoma, ER action is augmented, leading to endometrial hyperplasia and progression to malignancy. Future studies correlating expression with response to hormonal therapy may be beneficial.

What clinicians need to know about antioestrogen resistance in breast cancer therapy

Tamoxifen is the drug most used for early breast cancer treatment in oestrogen receptor (ER) positive patients. Unfortunately, despite high ER tumour levels in a tumour, resistance to endocrine therapy, either de novo or acquired after prolonged treatment, can occur. In this review, we will try to summarise the postulated mechanisms of hormonal-resistance, namely, the role of co-regulators and the crosstalk between the HER-2, IGF-IR, Cox-2 and ER pathways. Other predictive markers of tamoxifen-resistance/response, such as cyclin E and UPA/PAI-1, are also discussed.

Effects of acetylation, polymerase phosphorylation, and DNA unwinding in glucocorticoid receptor transactivation

Varying the concentration of selected factors alters the induction properties of steroid receptors by changing the position of the dose-response curve (or the value for half-maximal induction=EC(50)) and the amount of partial agonist activity of antisteroids. We now describe a rudimentary mathematical model that predicts a simple Michaelis-Menten curve for the multi-step process of steroid-regulated gene induction. This model suggests that steps far downstream from receptor binding to steroid can influence the EC(50) of agonist-complexes and partial agonist activity of antagonist-complexes. We therefore asked whether inhibitors of three possible downstream steps can reverse the effects of increased concentrations of two factors: glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and Ubc9. The downstream steps (with inhibitors in parentheses) are protein deacetylation (TSA and VPA), DNA unwinding (CPT), and CTD phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II (DRB and H8). None of the inhibitors mimic or prevent the effects of added GRs. However, inhibitors of DNA unwinding and CTD phosphorylation do reverse the effects of Ubc9 with high GR concentrations. These results support our earlier conclusion that different rate-limiting steps operate at low and high GR concentrations versus high GR with Ubc9. The present data also suggest that downstream steps can modulate the EC(50) of GR-mediated induction, thus both supporting the utility of our mathematical model and widening the field of biochemical processes that can modify the EC(50).

Modulation of transcriptional sensitivity of mineralocorticoid and estrogen receptors

Recent reports describe the ability of factors to modulate the position of the dose-response curve of receptor-agonist complexes, and the amount of partial agonist activity of receptor-antagonist complexes, of androgen, glucocorticoid (GRs), and progesterone receptors (PRs). We now ask whether this modulation extends to the two remaining steroid receptors: mineralocorticoid (MRs) and estrogen receptors (ERs). These studies of MR were facilitated by our discovery that the antiglucocorticoid dexamethasone 21-mesylate (Dex-Mes) is a new antimineralocorticoid with significant amounts of partial agonist activity. Elevated levels of MR, the co-activators TIF2 and SRC-1, and the co-repressor SMRT do modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of MR complexes. Interestingly, the precise responses are indistinguishable from those seen with GRs in the same cells. Thus, the unequal transactivation of common genes by MRs versus GRs probably cannot be explained by differential responses to changing cellular concentrations of homologous receptor, co-activators, or co-repressors. We also find that the dose-response curve of ER-estradiol complexes is left-shifted to lower steroid concentrations by higher amounts of exogenous ER. Therefore, the modulation of either the dose-response curve of agonists or the partial agonist activity of antisteroid, and in many cases the modulation of both properties, is a common phenomenon for all of the classical steroid receptors.

Structure/Activity Relationships for GMEB-2: The Second Member of the Glucocorticoid Modulatory Element-Binding Complex

The position of the dose-response curve of agonist complexes of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs), and the partial agonist activity of GR-antagonist complexes, can be modulated by two proteins (GMEB-1 and -2), which bind as oligomers to a DNA element that is called a glucocorticoid modulatory element, or GME. This element is active when located upstream of the glucocorticoid response element that controls the expression of a reporter gene. Here, we report the structure/activity relationships of GMEB-2 and compare them to our previous findings for GMEB-1. Most of the activities of GMEB-2, such as homo- and heterooligomerization, binding to GR and to CBP, DNA binding, and modulation of the above GR transcriptional properties, require large regions of the protein. Only the intrinsic transactivation activity could be localized to a small region of the protein. These studies shed light on the mechanism of action of GMEB-2 and further support our previous conclusion that the ability of factors to modulate the position of the dose-response curve, and the partial agonist activity, of GR complexes is unrelated to effects on the total levels of GR-induced gene expression. These studies also identify regions of GMEB-2 possessing yet unidentified properties that are critical for several activities. Finally, as the domain organization of GMEB-2 and -1 is extremely similar, we conclude that the quantitative differences in activities derive from variations in amino acid sequence rather than more global features of protein structure.