Valacyclovir in the treatment of acute retinal necrosis

Prognostic factors associated with acute retinal necrosis treated non-surgically

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the prognostic factors for visual acuity in acute retinal necrosis (ARN) patients treated non-surgically.

METHODS

The clinical data of ARN patients who visited our hospital from January 2010 to January 2023 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (29 eyes) were included. Aqueous humour samples were collected from 20 out of 29 eyes, and PCR confirmed that 85% (17/20) of the eyes had VZV infection, 10% (2/20) had CMV infection, and 5% (1/20) had HSV infection. All patients were treated with intravenous antiviral agents. Intravitreal ganciclovir and oral corticosteroids were given according to the patients' wishes. A comparison of visual acuity at the time of first identification of inactive ARN with that at the first visit revealed that 16 (55.2%) eyes improved and 13 (44.8%) did not improve. Logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors for failure to improve vision after treatment included retinal detachment (odds ratio [OR],33.75; 95% CI, 3.245-351.067; P = 0.003), necrotising retinitis involving the posterior pole (odds ratio [OR],8.167; 95% CI, 1.297-51.403, P = 0.025), and arteritis involving the large retinal arteries (odds ratio [OR],9.167; 95% CI, 1.493-56.297; P = 0.017). The VZV viral load in the aqueous humour at initial presentation was significantly associated with visual prognosis (r = 0.688, P = 0.013), retinal detachment (τ = 0.597, P = 0.021) and the extent of retinal necrosis (τ = 0.57, P = 0.027). The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of VZV-infected patients at first presentation was significantly correlated with the prognosis of visual acuity (r = 0.616, P = 0.033) and retinal detachment (τ = 0.728, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

High NLR and viral DNA copy number in the aqueous humour at the initial presentation, as well as subsequent retinal detachment, necrotising retinitis involving the posterior pole, and arteritis involving the large retinal arteries were risk factors for poor visual prognosis in VZV-infected ARN patients.

Acute Retinal Necrosis: Experience in a Reference Center in Santander - Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a severe eye disease demanding swift treatment to prevent blindness. Early action involving antiviral medications and corticosteroids is crucial for optimal visual outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We present an ARN case series showcasing treatment experience and results.

METHODOLOGY

Patients diagnosed with ARN based on SUN Working Group 2021 criteria were included; all underwent comprehensive eye exams, PCR analysis, and imaging.

RESULTS

 Eight patients were studied; PCR confirmed ARN in six. Induction treatment, either oral valacyclovir (5/8) or intravenous acyclovir (3/8), lasted 10-14 days. Maintenance included oral valacyclovir (6/8), oral valganciclovir (2/8) for six months, along with intravitreal ganciclovir. Visual outcomes were similar for oral and intravenous therapies; poor baseline acuity and macular involvement tend to result in a worse final acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Swift treatment is vital to ARN management. Our findings emphasize effective treatment strategies' role in visual prognosis.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACV: Acyclovir; BCVA: Best Corrected Visual Acuity; CMV: Cytomegalovirus; EBV: Epstein Barr Virus; FTA-ABS: Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test; HSV 1-2: Herpes simplex virus 1-2; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; IV-ACV: Intravenous- Acyclovir; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction;Tg: Toxoplasma gondii; VZV: Varicella Zoster Virus; VCV: Valacyclovir; VDRL: Venereal disease research laboratory test.

Treatment outcomes of PCR-positive acute retinal necrosis

BACKGROUND

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a progressive necrotizing retinitis caused by viral infection. Optimal management strategies have not been established for this detrimental disease. Previous literature published suggests that Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV1) are the most common promoters of acute retinal necrosis (ARN).

AIMS

The purpose of our study was to investigate the viral distribution, demographic, and treatment outcomes of ARN.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review evaluated data from PCR-positive ARN patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2018.

RESULTS

Analysis of fourteen eyes from 12 patients found CMV and VZV as the commonest causes of ARN. Patients on 1 g of valacyclovir three times a day (V1T) had worse vision between first and final visits (mean difference of 1.25 ± 0.65, n = 2) compared with patients treated with 2 g of valacyclovir three times a day (V2T), or 900 mg twice a day of valganciclovir (V9B) (mean difference of - 0.067 ± 0.13, n = 6, and 0.067 ± 0.067, n = 6, respectively). Both V1T patients developed retinal detachments (RD). Both CMV patients treated with intravitreal triamcinolone developed ARN, elevated IOP, and one developed multiple RD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review found increased incidence of CMV-positive ARN. Patients with zone 1 disease had worse initial visual acuity. Moreover, patients had more favorable outcomes with V2T and V9B compared to V1T. CMV-positive patients clinically worsened after intravitreal steroid injections, further underscoring the value of a PCR diagnosis to tailor the patients' treatment plan accordingly.

Antiviral treatment for acute retinal necrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute retinal necrosis is a progressive intraocular inflammatory syndrome characterized by diffuse necrotizing retinitis that can lead to a poor visual outcome, mainly from retinal detachment. The antiviral treatment approach for acute retinal necrosis varies as there are no established guidelines. We summarize the outcomes of acute retinal necrosis with available antiviral treatments. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for interventional and observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled proportion of the predefined selected outcomes. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022320987). Thirty-four studies with a total of 963 participants and 1,090 eyes were included in the final analysis. The estimated varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex virus polymerase chain reaction-positive cases were 63% (95% CI: 55-71%) and 35% (95% CI: 28-42%), respectively. The 3 main antiviral treatment approaches identified were oral antivirals alone, intravenous antivirals alone, and a combination of systemic (oral or intravenous) and intravitreal antivirals. The overall pooled estimated proportions of visual acuity improvement, recurrence, and retinal detachment were 37% (95% CI: 27-47%), 14% (95% CI: 8-21%), and 43% (95% CI: 38-50%), respectively. Patients treated with systemic and intravitreal antivirals showed a trend towards better visual outcomes than those treated with systemic antivirals (oral or intravenous) alone, even though this analysis was not statistically significant (test for subgroup differences P = 0.83).

A case of recurrent viral retinitis treated with intravitreal antiviral agents in a silicone oil filled eye

PURPOSE

To report a case of recurrent acute retinal necrosis (ARN) in an eye filled with silicone oil previously complicated by rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

OBSERVATIONS

A 68-year-old gentlemen with successfully treated herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1) ARN complicated by RRD requiring pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil tamponade, presented with a relapse of ARN with silicone oil in situ. Remission of recurrent retinitis was achieved using combined systemic oral and intravitreal antiviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE

RRD is a significant complication of ARN which may require surgery with silicone oil tamponade. Recurrence of ARN retinitis can be effectively treated with intravitreal Ganciclovir and Foscarnet injections in a silicone oil filled eye with concurrent oral antiviral therapy. Aqueous humour sampling proved useful in the monitoring of disease activity.

Long-term follow-up of acute retinal necrosis with retinal detachment secondary to herpes simplex virus type 2 with a successful visual outcome

A man in his early 20s presented with acute loss of vision in his only eye, the left eye (OS), and was on oral steroids. He had lost vision in his right eye during his childhood and the cause was unknown. There was no history of trauma. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in OS was 20/100 and in the right eye was hand movements. OS showed non-granulomatous keratic precipitates on the cornea, anterior chamber flare 1+ and cell 1+, early cataract, vitreous haze and cells 2+ with nasal retinal detachment and superior full thickness retinitis. He underwent pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal ganciclovir and barrage laser away from the necrotic retina. PCR for herpes simplex virus 2 was positive from the aqueous and vitreous sample. He was started on oral valacyclovir 1 g three times a day and continued on tapering dose of oral steroids. BCVA in OS at 6-month follow-up was 20/25.

Choroidal Involvement in a Case of Acute Retinal Necrosis

PURPOSE

To report choroidal involvement in a case of ARN.

CASE REPORT

A 26-year-old immunocompetent female presented with a history of decreased vision in the right eye for 4 days. The best corrected visual acuity in the right eye was 3/60. Anterior segment examination showed circumciliary congestion, endothelial pigments, and 1+ cells in the anterior chamber. Fundus examination revealed mild vitritis, disc edema, multifocal patchy retinitis lesions involving the fovea and mid periphery, and arteriolitis. OCT revealed an RPE bump at the macula corroborating with hypocyanacent lesions on indocyanine angiography, which persisted till the late phase, indicating choroidal involvement. The patient was started on oral valacyclovir and oral steroids. Additionally, intravitreal ganciclovir injection was added, leading to a favorable outcome. The final visual acuity post silicone oil removal was 6/60.

CONCLUSION

This is a unique case of ARN having choroidal involvement along with the previously described classical features.

Clinical and Virological Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Viral Necrotizing Retinitis

Purpose: Describe the clinical and virological characteristics of viral necrotizing retinitis (VNR) and assess its prognostic factors. Methods: Retrospective study (Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris) of consecutive VNR patients diagnosed and monitored by qPCR on aqueous humor between 2015 and 2019. All patients received induction therapy with intravenous +/− intravitreal injections (IVI) of antivirals. Results: Forty-one eyes of 37 patients with a mean age of 56 years were included. Involved viruses were VZV (44%), CMV (37%) and HSV2 (19%). Acute retinal necrosis represented 51%, progressive outer retinal necrosis 12% and CMV retinitis 37% of eyes. Forty-six percent of patients were immunocompromised. Median BCVA was 0.7 LogMAR at baseline and 0.8 LogMAR after an average of 14.1 months. VNR bilateralized in 27% of cases after 32 months. Retinal detachment (RD) occurred in 27% of cases after a mean duration of 98 days. Factors associated with a “poor BCVA” at 1 month were: advanced age, low baseline BCVA, high vitritis grade and viral load (VL) at baseline and the “slow responder” status (i.e., VL decrease <50% after 2 weeks of treatment). Factors associated with RD were: advanced age, immunocompetence, low baseline BCVA, high vitritis grade at baseline and use of ≤5 IVIs. Conclusions: Clinical factors including advanced age, immunocompetence, low BCVA and high vitritis grade at baseline were associated with a poor prognosis. New virological factors were predictive of a poor outcome: high baseline VL and the “slow responder” status. Sequential intraocular fluid sampling might help prognosticate the outcomes of VNR.

Acute retinal necrosis. Management and visual outcomes: a case series

Background

The present study reports the functional and anatomical outcomes of eyes with acute retinal necrosis(ARN).

Methods

This is a retrospective case series conducted at a tertiary Eye Hospital from March 2015 to March 2020. Medical records of patients with clinical and laboratorial—Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)—diagnosis of ARN were reviewed. To identify factors related to the outcomes of visual acuity(VA) and retinal detachment (RD) over time, Cox proportional hazards regression modeling and survival analyses were used.

Results

Twenty-three eyes of 23 patients (16 male, 7 female) were reviewed. Based on the PCR results, 16 cases (69.6%) had Varicella zoster virus, 3 cases (13%) had Cytomegalovirus, 1 patient (4.3%) had Herpes simplex virus associated ARN, and 1 case (4.3%) had negative PCR. The incident rate for ≥ 2-line VA gain was 0.28/eye-year (EY) (95% CI 0.21 ± 0.26) while the rate of severe vision loss was 0.09/eye-year (95% CI 0.05 ± 0.08). The RD development was observed at a rate of 0.43/eye-year (0.42 ± 0.02), which occurred in 9 eyes with a mean time of 100 days after the initial presentation of ARN. Patients’ age was the only factor associated with 2-line or more gain in VA over time with a hazard ratio of 0.921 (95% CI 0.854–0.993, P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Generally, although being crucial, treatment is not highly effective in improvement of VA and decrease of RD development, as well as vision loss, in patients with ARN. However, treatment prevents fellow eye involvement efficiently. Younger age is associated with better response to treatment and more chance to achieve better VA.

Acute retinal necrosis: A mini review

Acute retinal necrosis is a rare but potentially devastating disease. Even in the era of modern medicine, retinal detachment is a frequent complication leading to vison loss, as well as phthisis bulbi. Whereas IV acyclovir still remains the standard of care, high doses of valacyclovir with/without additional intravitreal injections of foscarnet have been used. In an attempt to reduce the retinal detachment rate, prophylactic laser treatment and early vitrectomy have been proposed. In this article, we aim to review current diagnostic and treatment modalities.

Therapeutic prognostic factors associated with retinal detachment and visual outcomes in acute retinal necrosis

BACKGROUND

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a fulminant necrotizing vaso-occlusive retinitis associated with a high incidence of vision loss. Prognostic factors associated with the treatment of ARN have not been comprehensively identified. This study aimed to determine therapeutic prognostic factors associated with long-term clinical outcomes in eyes with ARN.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with ARN who were treated between 2005 and 2019 in two tertiary ophthalmology departments in Seoul, Korea. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate prognostic factors associated with late-onset retinal detachment (RD) and vision loss (<20/200).

RESULTS

Sixty-one eyes with ARN with an average follow-up of 63.5 months were included. Surgical intervention of vitrectomy (odds ratio [OR], 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.004-0.47) and intraoperative prophylactic laser use (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-0.81) were independently associated with a decreased risk of late RD. The factors independently associated with an increased risk of vision loss were worse initial visual acuity (OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.50-7.21), zone 1 involvement of necrotic retinitis (OR, 10.84; 95% CI, 1.62-72.41), and late-onset RD (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.92-31.54).

CONCLUSION

Vitrectomy and/or prophylactic intraoperative laser treatment may be effective treatment options in preventing delayed RD associated with an increased risk of vision loss in eyes with ARN.

Long-Term Follow-Up Results of a Patient Undergoing Acute Retinal Necrosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Purpose

To describe the follow-up and treatment approach of a patient with acute retinal necrosis. Case Report. A 44-year-old male patient, who had complaints of pain in the right eye and blurred vision, was referred to our clinic. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.4. There was 2+ anterior chamber reaction and diffuse smooth-rounded keratic precipitates. Fundus examination revealed optic nerve and vascular involvement. Fundus fluorescein angiography revealed extensive ischemia in the periphery. Oral antiviral therapy was preferred. In addition, systemic steroid and laser photocoagulation were applied. Nonetheless, retinal detachment developed 2 months later. Detachment, silicon removal, and cataract surgery were performed sequentially. It was observed that the patient was followed for 4.5 years and did not have contralateral eye involvement. Best-corrected visual acuity remained stable at 0.3.

Conclusion

Early diagnosis, appropriate treatment, accurate complication management, and frequent follow-up may provide useful vision in patients with acute retinal necrosis.

RETINAL DETACHMENT AFTER ACUTE RETINAL NECROSIS AND THE EFFICACIES OF DIFFERENT INTERVENTIONS: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

PURPOSE

To estimate the rate of retinal detachment (RD) after acute retinal necrosis (ARN) and evaluate the efficacies of different interventions.

METHODS

The databases Medline and EMBASE from inception to March 2020 were searched to identify the relevant studies. R software version 3.6.3 was used to perform the statistical analyses. Results in proportion with 95% confidence interval were calculated using generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies involving 1,811 patients were finally included. The pooling results suggested the general RD rate of ARN was 47%. The RD rate increased with the extent of retinitis and was slightly lower when involved Zone III. The RD rate was 37% for herpes simplex virus ARN and 46% for varicella-zoster virus ARN; 52% for immunocompetent patients and 39% for immunocompromised patients. Retinal detachment presented in 2% of eyes at the first visit. Systemic antiviral therapy could lower the RD rate significantly from 67% to 43%, and prophylactic vitrectomy could lower the RD rate significantly from 45% to 22%. Systemic antiviral therapy plus vitrectomy achieved the lowest RD rate to 18%. Although the efficacy of prophylactic laser or intravitreal antiviral therapy was still limited. Prophylactic vitrectomy might significantly increase the incidence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy from 7% to 32%.

CONCLUSION

About half of the eyes might develop RD during the entire course of ARN. Systemic antiviral therapy and prophylactic vitrectomy are effective interventions to prevent RD, whereas the roles of prophylactic laser or adjunctive intravitreal antiviral therapy are still unclear. Varicella-zoster virus ARN and cases with extensive retinitis might need intensified interventions.

Antimicrobial guide to posterior segment infections

PURPOSE

This review article is meant to serve as a reference guide and to assist the treating physician in making an appropriate selection and duration of an antimicrobial agent.

METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

Infections of the posterior segment require prompt medical or surgical therapy to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss. While numerous options exist to treat these infections, doses and alternative therapies, especially with contraindications for first-line therapy, are often elusive. Antimicrobial agents to treat posterior segment infections can be administered via various routes, including topical, intravitreal, intravenous, and oral.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are many excellent review articles on the management of endophthalmitis, we take the opportunity in this review to comprehensively summarize the appropriate antimicrobial regimen of both common and rare infectious etiologies of the posterior segment, using evidence from clinical trials and large case series.

Management Strategies of Acute Retinal Necrosis: Current Perspectives

Acute retinal necrosis is a rare yet devastating disease, with significant ocular morbidity. Over the past several decades, initial treatment regimens have shifted from intravenous antivirals requiring hospital admission to the routine use of oral antivirals with intravitreal antivirals for immediate local control. Given the rarity of this disease process and a lack of large-scale research trials, debate continues over recommended practice guidelines. In this paper, we review current diagnostic criteria and recommend a treatment algorithm based on available evidence.

Neurological and Ophthalmological Manifestations of Varicella Zoster Virus

BACKGROUND

Approximately 1 million new cases of herpes zoster (HZ) occur in the United States annually, including 10%-20% with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Postherpetic neuralgia, a debilitating pain syndrome occurs in 30% HZ, whereas 50% HZO develop ophthalmic complications. Diplopia from cranial nerve palsy occurs in less than 30% HZO, whereas optic neuropathy is seen in less than 1% HZO. We reviewed recent developments in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of HZ as well as neurological and ophthalmological complications of relevance to the neuro-ophthalmologist.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched the English language literature on Pubmed and Google scholar for articles relevant to the various sections of this review.

RESULTS

Antiviral treatment should be initiated within 48-72 hours of onset of HZ and HZO to decrease pain and reduce complications. We recommend neuroimaging in all patients with neuro-ophthalmic manifestations such as diplopia and acute vision loss. Diagnostic confirmation using polymerase chain reaction and serology on paired serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples should be obtained in those with neurological signs and symptoms or abnormal imaging. Patients with neurological and/or retinal varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection should be treated promptly with intravenous acyclovir. Patients with isolated optic neuropathy or cranial nerve palsy can be managed with oral antivirals. The prognosis for visual recovery is good for patients with isolated optic neuropathy and excellent for patients with isolated ocular motor cranial nerve palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

HZ produces a spectrum of potentially blinding and life-threatening complications that adversely affect quality of life and increase health care costs. Individuals at risk for HZ, such as the elderly and immunocompromised, should be encouraged to receive the highly effective VZV vaccine to prevent HZ and its complications.

Acute Retinal Necrosis: Virological Features Using Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction, Therapeutic Management, and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of patients treated with intensive intravitreal therapy and to describe the evolution of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in patients treated for acute retinal necrosis (ARN) syndrome.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

This study included 25 eyes of 24 patients with ARN who were treated and followed up in 2 departments of ophthalmology in Lyon, France. Assessed outcomes included qPCR viral load profile during treatment, number of antiviral intravitreal injections (IVT), retinal detachment rate, and best-corrected visual acuity.

RESULTS

Final visual acuity was 20/200 or less in 20% of cases; the rate of retinal detachment was 16%. Viral load kinetics changed in 3 phases: a first plateau period that was not consistent, a logarithmic decrease phase, and a negativation phase. Mean decay of the logarithm of the viral load was estimated at 0.076 per day; mean time of negativation was 56.1 days. Median IVT number was 9 (range, 0-28). Ten patients were treated with injections until the viral load was undetectable. Resistance to acyclovir was observed in a patient with a prolonged initial plateau of the viral load.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous and prolonged IVTs, used as adjunctive therapy, could improve the prognosis of treated patients by decreasing the risk of retinal detachment and improving visual acuity. QPCR enables monitoring of the response to treatment and can provide evidence for resistance to antiviral treatment by enabling the detection of cases with a prolonged initial plateau of viral load.

Acute retinal necrosis in a patient with remote severe herpes simplex encephalitis

A 60-year-old man with a history of severe herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) encephalitis 2 years prior presented with acute onset of visual loss in the left eye. Dilated funduscopic examination showed retinitis and occlusive vasculitis with retinal necrosis. PCR of the vitreous fluid was positive for HSV-1, and he was diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis (ARN) due to HSV-1. The patient was treated with intravenous acyclovir and intravitreous foscarnet for 2 weeks, followed by high dose oral valacyclovir for 2 weeks. He was subsequently placed on planned life-long suppressive valacyclovir. His case demonstrates that acute visual loss concomitant with or subsequent to HSV-1 encephalitis warrants suspicion of ARN. Prompt therapy with effective antiviral medication is necessary to reduce the risk of sight-threatening complications. Chronic suppression with oral antiviral therapy after ARN is recommended to prevent involvement of the contralateral eye, though there is no consensus on the duration and dosage of antivirals.

Molecular diagnosis and ocular imaging of varicella zoster virus associated neuroretinitis

Purpose

To report a case of varicella zoster virus associated neuroretinitis confirmed via polymerase chain reaction analysis of ocular fluid.

Observations

A 30-year-old man presented with a 1-week history of decreased vision in his left eye and ulcerative skin lesions above his left eyebrow. On exam, he had clinical findings consistent with neuroretinitis characterized by optic disc edema and formation of a macular star. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of aqueous fluid was positive for varicella zoster virus. He was treated with oral valacyclovir with excellent resolution of his symptoms and clinical findings.

Conclusions and importance

Varicella zoster virus is a rare cause of neuroretinitis. We report for the first time a case of varicella zoster virus associated neuroretinitis confirmed by polymerase chain reaction analysis of ocular fluid. Molecular testing of ocular tissue may lead to a definitive diagnosis.

Acute Retinal Necrosis Caused by the Zoster Vaccine Virus

We report acute retinal necrosis caused by the vaccine Oka strain following immunization of a 78-year-old woman with live zoster vaccine. Whole genome sequencing confirmed the ocular vOka strain to be derived from the vaccine and excluded the presence of new mutations or recombination with wild-type Varicella zoster virus.

Comparing Treatment of Acute Retinal Necrosis With Either Oral Valacyclovir or Intravenous Acyclovir

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcomes of patients with acute retinal necrosis (ARN) treated initially with intravenous acyclovir vs oral valacyclovir therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients (68 eyes) with ARN, treated at Moorfields Eye Hospital (United Kingdom) between 1992 and 2016, were identified through the hospital's electronic database. Exclusion criteria included insufficient patient records or follow-up (<150 days). Fifty-six patients had unilateral ARN, while 6 had bilateral ARN. Patients who received intravenous acyclovir on diagnosis (n = 33) were compared with patients treated with oral valacyclovir (n = 29) across outcomes including best-corrected visual acuity, retinal detachment, severe vision loss, and other complications. The impact of adjunctive intravitreal antiviral and prophylactic barrier laser treatment was also assessed.

RESULTS

Change in best-corrected visual acuity was not significantly different for eyes treated initially with intravenous therapy vs oral therapy over 5 years of follow-up data (P = .16). There was no difference in the rates of severe vision loss between the 2 groups (46% and 59%, respectively, P = .18), or of those eyes retaining good vision (28% vs 31%, respectively, P = .80). Retinal detachment occurred in 63% of cases and did not differ across treatment groups (62% vs 66%, respectively, P = .67). Barrier laser and intravitreal therapy had no effect on retinal detachment rate in either group.

CONCLUSION

Oral valacyclovir is clinically equivalent to intravenous therapy in the management of ARN. Oral valacyclovir as an outpatient therapy-with or without intravitreal foscarnet-can therefore be considered as an acceptable alternative to inpatient therapy required for intravenous treatment.

Chronic Retinal Necrosis Severely Complicated by Neovascular Glaucoma: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Chronic retinal necrosis (CRN) is a rare chronic granular necrotizing retinitis that was first described in 2013. CRN is characterized by intraocular inflammation accompanied by occlusive vasculitis, granular retinitis, and slowly progressing necrosis around the retina in a host with partial immune dysfunction. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is reported to be a causative agent. There are several ocular complications such as retinal detachment and neovascular glaucoma; however, there has been no description of a clinical manifestation of neovascular glaucoma in CRN. We herein present a case of severe neovascular glaucoma in association with CRN.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 80-year-old man was referred to our hospital with poor control of inflammation and intraocular pressure (IOP). The IOP in his left eye was 29 mm Hg. Anterior chamber cells (2+) and keratic precipitates were observed. In the peripheral retina, vitreous opacities and granular necrotizing retinitis were noticed. Fluorescein angiography revealed extensive retinal nonperfusion area from the macula lesion to the periphery. PCR analysis of aqueous humor showed the presence of CMV. A diagnosis of CRN was made soon afterwards. Antiviral drug and systemic corticosteroid were administered. The treatment temporally resolved the symptom; however, panretinal photocoagulation and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab were performed to treat iris neovascularization. During the follow-up, trabeculectomy was performed because of poor IOP control. At the final visit, severe uncontrolled neovascular glaucoma caused hyphema, and his left eye lost light perception.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of CRN is poor because of severe neovascular glaucoma and careful observation and active treatments are necessary.

Acute Retinal Necrosis: Presenting Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in a Cohort of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Positive Patients

PURPOSE

To identify determinants of adverse outcomes in acute retinal necrosis (ARN), presenting characteristics and incidence rates of vision loss and ocular complications in a cohort of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive eyes were analyzed.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

METHODS

Forty-one eyes of 36 patients with clinically diagnosed ARN, PCR-positive for herpes simplex virus or varicella zoster virus and evaluated between January 2002 and June 2013, were included. Main outcome measures included incidence rates of vision loss and retinal detachment (RD).

RESULTS

Presenting visual acuity was generally poor (20/50 to >20/200 in 27%; 20/200 or worse in 56%). The incidence rate of ≤20/200 was 0.66/eye-year (EY), (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32/EY to 1.22/EY); the rate of light perception or no light perception vision was 0.07/EY (95% CI, 0.02/EY to 0.16/EY). During follow-up, 59% of eyes developed at least 1 RD (rate = 0.40/EY, 95% CI, 0.19/EY to 0.58/EY). Eyes with retinitis involving ≥25% of the retina at presentation detached at nearly 12 times the rate, as compared to those with <25% retinal involvement (0.70/EY vs 0.06/EY; P = .001). Development of an RD was the greatest determinant of adverse visual outcomes, with 4% of eyes, that had experienced at least 1 RD, achieving a best-corrected visual acuity of ≥20/40 compared to 53% of eyes that never detached (P = .0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor outcomes in ARN were common in this cohort. RD confers the greatest risk of incident vision loss, and once 25% or more of the retina is involved the risk of RD and visual loss increases significantly.

Efficacy of Oral Valacyclovir Treatment in a Case with Acute Retinal Necrosis

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a rapidly progressive disease with poor prognosis, leading to visual loss in most cases. Rapid diagnosis and early anti-viral treatment significantly affect the course and prognosis of the disease. In this case report, we present a 34-year-old female patient referred to our clinic with symptoms of blurred vision and ocular pain diagnosed as acute glaucoma elsewhere. A clinical diagnosis of ARN was made and anti-viral treatment was started immediately. We herein describe our treatment approach to this particular case and discuss previously reported treatment modalities.

Valacyclovir as Initial Treatment for Acute Retinal Necrosis: A Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Study

PURPOSE

Acute retinal necrosis (ARN) is a feared complication of infectious retinitis most commonly caused by varicella zoster virus (VZV). We performed a pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation study by integrating the existing understanding of physiology with previously published data to evaluate the vitreal penetration of oral valacyclovir for the treatment of ARN, under various dosing scenarios.

METHOD

We compared different oral valacyclovir dosing regimens with intravenous acyclovir. The vitreous compartment was modeled as a peripheral compartment, and paired serum and vitreal acyclovir concentrations were obtained from previously published data of adult patients with ARN undergoing vitrectomy. The efficacy threshold for vitreal acyclovir concentrations was based on the previously reported IC₅₀ values for VZV.

RESULTS

Based on the minimum vitreal acyclovir concentrations (C_min) relative to the mean IC₅₀ for VZV, valacyclovir 1.5 g every 8 hours performed similarly to intravenous acyclovir 700 mg every 8 hours, with the minimum concentration (C_min) exceeding the mean IC₅₀ after the second dose. In contrast, the standard dosing regimen for herpes zoster, valacyclovir 1 g every 8 hours, performed inferiorly to the intravenous acyclovir regimen throughout the dosing interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Modeling and simulation data support oral valacyclovir for the treatment of ARN, although the required dosing exceeds the recommended FDA dose size for herpes zoster.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Retinal Necrosis: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To evaluate the available evidence in peer-reviewed publications about the diagnosis and treatment of acute retinal necrosis (ARN).

METHODS

Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on July 27, 2016. The searches identified 216 unique citations, and 49 articles of possible clinical relevance were reviewed in full text. Of these 49 articles, 27 were deemed sufficiently relevant or of interest, and they were rated according to strength of evidence. An additional 6 articles were identified from the reference lists of these articles and included. All 33 studies were retrospective.

RESULTS

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of aqueous or vitreous humor was positive for herpes simplex virus (HSV) or varicella zoster virus (VZV) in 79% to 100% of cases of suspected ARN. Aqueous and vitreous specimens are both sensitive and specific. There is level II and III evidence supporting the use of intravenous and oral antiviral therapy for the treatment of ARN. Data suggest that equivalent plasma drug levels of acyclovir can be achieved after administration of oral valacyclovir or intravenous acyclovir. There is level II and III evidence suggesting that the combination of intravitreal foscarnet and systemic antiviral therapy may have greater therapeutic efficacy than systemic therapy alone. The effectiveness of prophylactic laser or early pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in preventing retinal detachment (RD) remains unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Polymerase chain reaction testing of ocular fluid is useful in supporting a clinical diagnosis of ARN, but treatment should not be delayed while awaiting PCR results. Initial oral or intravenous antiviral therapy is effective in treating ARN. The adjunctive use of intravitreal foscarnet may be more effective than systemic therapy alone. The role of prophylactic laser retinopexy or early PPV is unknown at this time.

Valacyclovir versus acyclovir for the treatment of herpes zoster ophthalmicus in immunocompetent patients

BACKGROUND

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus affects the eye and vision, and is caused by the reactivation of the varicella zoster virus in the distribution of the first division of the trigeminal nerve. An aggressive management of acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus with systemic antiviral medication is generally recommended as the standard first-line treatment for herpes zoster ophthalmicus infections. Both acyclovir and its prodrug valacyclovir are medications that are approved for the systemic treatment of herpes zoster. Although it is known that valacyclovir has an improved bioavailability and steadier plasma concentration, it is currently unclear as to whether this leads to better treatment results and less ocular complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of valacyclovir versus acyclovir for the systemic antiviral treatment of herpes zoster ophthalmicus in immunocompetent patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2016, Issue 5), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to June 2016), Embase (January 1980 to June 2016), Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S; January 1990 to June 2016), BIOSIS Previews (January 1969 to June 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP; www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 13 June 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which systemic valacyclovir was compared to systemic acyclovir medication for treatment of herpes zoster ophthalmicus. There were no language restrictions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, evaluated the risk of bias in included trials, and extracted and analysed data. We did not conduct a meta-analysis, as only one study was included. We assessed the certainty of the evidence for the selected outcomes using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

One study fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In this multicentre, randomised double-masked study carried out in France, 110 immunocompetent people with herpes zoster ophthalmicus, diagnosed within 72 hours of skin eruption, were treated, with 56 participants allocated to the valacyclovir group and 54 to the acyclovir group. The study was poorly reported and we judged it to be unclear risk of bias for most domains.Persistent ocular lesions after 6 months were observed in 2/56 people in the valacyclovir group compared with 1/54 people in the acyclovir group (risk ratio (RR) 1.93 (95% CI 0.18 to 20.65); very low certainty evidence. Dendritic ulcer appeared in 3/56 patients treated with valacyclovir, while 1/54 suffered in the acyclovir group (RR 2.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 26.96); very low certainty evidence), uveitis in 7/56 people in the valacyclovir group compared with 9/54 in the acyclovir group (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.57); very low certainty evidence). Similarly, there was uncertainty as to the comparative effects of these two treatments on post-herpetic pain, and side effects (vomiting, eyelid or facial edema, disseminated zoster). Due to concerns about imprecision (small number of events and large confidence intervals) and study limitations, the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach was rated as low to very low for the use of valacyclovir compared to acyclovir.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review included data from only one study, which had methodological limitations. As such, our results indicated uncertainty of the relative benefits and harms of valacyclovir over acyclovir in herpes zoster ophthalmicus, despite its widespread use for this condition. Further well-designed and adequately powered trials are needed. These trials should include outcomes important to patients, including compliance.

Acute Retinal Necrosis: Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies in Germany

PURPOSE

To analyze the preferred practice respective diagnosis, treatment, and complications in patients with acute retinal necrosis in Germany.

METHODS

The uveitis-section of the German Ophthalmologic Society developed a questionnaire with 12 questions concerning patients with acute retinal necrosis seen in the 5 years up to August 2009.

RESULTS

In total, 35 eye hospitals answered the questionnaire and reported 213 patients with acute retinal necrosis. Diagnosis was made clinically in 86%. Anterior chamber tap, vitreous biopsy, diagnostic vitrectomy, and serology were performed for confirmation. Therapy was started with acyclovir in all institutions, and continued with ganciclovir, foscarnet and brivudine in some cases. Intravitreal injections were performed in 46%. Additional oral steroids were given in 80%. A following oral antiviral treatment was performed in 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant variations were seen in diagnosis and treatment practices. The survey outlines the need for a unique diagnostic and therapeutic guideline.

Pattern of Acute Retinal Necrosis in a Referral Center in Tunisia, North Africa

PURPOSE

To describe the pattern of acute retinal necrosis (ARN) syndrome in a referral center in Tunisia.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the charts of 12 patients (12 eyes).

RESULTS

Necrotizing retinitis involved >50% of the retina in 33.3% of eyes. Polymerase chain reaction on aqueous humor sample identified herpes simplex virus-1 in 4 eyes (33.3%) and varicella zoster virus in 3 eyes (25%), and was negative in 5 eyes (41.7%). All patients received intravenous acyclovir, followed by oral antivirals. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 16 months. Retinal detachment (RD) occurred in 3 eyes (25%), but no patient developed bilateral ARN. Final visual acuity was 20/200 or worse in 7 eyes (58.3%). Delay in diagnosis (p = 0.015), macular involvement (p = 0.045), development of RD (p = 0.018), and 25-50% of retinal involvement (p = 0.045) were associated with a worse visual outcome.

CONCLUSION

ARN carries poor visual prognosis in Tunisia.

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as an adjuvant in the management of acute retinal necrosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as an adjuvant in the management of acute retinal necrosis (ARN).

DESIGN

Interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Four eyes of 4 patients diagnosed with ARN were studied.

METHODS

This pilot case series included 4 patients who presented with clinical features suggestive of ARN. IVTA was injected 1 to 2 weeks after initiation of antiviral therapy and concurrent usage of oral corticosteroids. The disease course and clinical outcome were observed. The patients received additional treatment depending on the sequelae of ARN.

RESULTS

Signs of reduction in vitritis and resolution of retinitis were observed as early as 1 week after IVTA was administered. In all 4 patients, inflammation promptly resolved with no untoward effects like raised intraocular pressure or worsening of the retinitis. A final visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 3 of 4 patients after appropriate treatment of ARN-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal triamcinolone under antiviral cover could be a useful adjunct to systemic steroids in the treatment of ARN.