Loss of reflex tearing after maxillary orthognathic surgery: a report of two cases

Cranial Nerve Injuries in Orthognathic Surgery: A Review of Literature

ABSTRACT

Orthognathic surgery is increasingly utilized to correct facial deformities and dental malocclusions, as well as to enhance facial aesthetics. Significant advancements in surgical planning and execution have made it more widespread and accessible. However, unfavorable outcomes or complications can occur, leading to potentially severe and possibly long-term consequences, such as cranial nerve injuries. This literature review investigates the cranial nerve complications associated with orthognathic surgery. We conducted an extensive search across available databases, analyzing relevant studies published up to September 30, 2023. Two authors independently selected articles for full-text review based on their titles and abstracts. The eligible studies reported cranial nerve injuries in individuals who had undergone orthognathic surgery. Our findings highlight the risk of cranial nerve injuries, their possible mechanism, management, and outcomes. It is imperative for surgeons to remain vigilant and informed and to communicate such information during preoperative patient consultation.

The evaluation of nasolacrimal duct injury in Le Fort I osteotomy patients

BACKGROUND

Although Le Fort I surgeries are safe and successful procedures; nasolacrimal duct injuries may be observed due to these surgeries. The study aimed to investigate the prevalence of nasolacrimal duct injury in Le Fort I osteotomy patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study consisting of patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomies between 2017 and 2021 in the Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry. The primary predictor variables were the distance of the nasolacrimal canal to the outer cortex of the maxilla and the nasal floor, as well as the superior-inferior level of the superiorly positioned screw inserted in the maxilla aperture region relative to the nasolacrimal canal. The outcome variable was the presence of a nasolacrimal duct injury. Mann Whitney U test was used for quantitative variables between the two groups. A Pearson chi-squared analysis was used to compare categorical data. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 290 nasolacrimal canals were evaluated in 145 patients, 87 females, and 58 males. The mean age was 23.47± 6.67. There was a statistically significant relationship between screw level and nasolacrimal canal perforation (p<0,001). The distance between the most anterior border of the nasolacrimal canal and the outer cortical of the maxilla was significantly less in the perforation group (p<0,001). The fixation screw was significantly closer to the nasolacrimal canal in the perforation group (p<0,001).

CONCLUSIONS

In Le Fort I surgery, nasolacrimal duct injury may occur during screw fixation to the aperture region. Superiorly positioned fixation screws in the aperture region may damage the nasolacrimal canal. In patients where the nasolacrimal canal is close to the outer cortex, care should be taken when applying the fixation screws to the aperture region to avoid damaging the canal.