Determinants for acceptance of preventive treatment against heart disease - a web-based population survey

A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease

Background

Reduction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a worldwide health priority and innovative uses of technology-based interventions may assist patients with improving prevention behaviours. Targeting these interventions to recipients most likely to benefit requires understanding how contexts of use influence responsiveness to the intervention, and how this interaction favours or discourages health behaviour. Using a realist evaluation approach, the aim of this study was to examine the contextual factors influencing behaviour change within a multi-feature eHealth intervention with personalised data integration from the primary care electronic health record (EHR).

Methods

Realist evaluation of qualitative data from the Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) randomised trial (N = 934). Thirty-six participants from the intervention group (N = 486) who had completed 12 months of study follow-up were interviewed. Coding of transcripts was structured around configurations of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes of intervention use. Contextual narratives were derived from thematic analysis of the interviews.

Results

Mechanisms favouring positive health behaviour occurred when participants responded to four interactive features of the intervention. Facilitating mechanisms included greater cognitive engagement whereby participants perceived value and benefit, and felt motivated, confident and incentivised. Participants moved from being unconcerned (or unaware) to more task-oriented engagement with personal CVD risk profile and prevention. Increased personalisation occurred when modifiable CVD risk factors became relatable to lifestyle behaviour; and experiences of feeling greater agency/self-efficacy emerged. Use and non-use of the intervention were influenced by four overarching narratives within the individual’s micro-level and meso-level environments: illness experiences; receptiveness to risk and prevention information; history of the doctor-patient relationship; and relationship with technology.

Conclusions

Intervention-context interactions are central to understanding how change mechanisms activate within complex interventions to exert their impact on recipients. Intervention use and non-use were context-dependent, underscoring the need for further research to target eHealth innovations to those most likely to benefit.

First-degree relatives of axial spondyloarthritis patients of the pre-SpA cohort would consider using medication in a preventive setting

To study the willingness of first-degree relatives of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients to use preventive medication. First-degree relatives of HLA-B27-positive axSpA patients (pre-SpA cohort) (n = 106) completed a survey including scenarios varying in disease risk, side effects, and treatment effect of hypothetical preventive medication and questions about their perceived risk of developing SpA and assessment of the severity of SpA. The willingness to use preventive medication was 63.2-91.5% (with 30-70% SpA risk, respectively) and declined to 27.4-51.9% respectively, when side effects might occur. On a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100 mm (totally disagree-totally agree) (median;range), participants were not occupied by the thought of developing SpA (23;13-39), did not assume that they will eventually develop SpA (22;14-35), and consider SpA a severe disease (66;52-78). The willingness to use preventive medication was negatively influenced by their own risk assessment of developing SpA (OR = 1.17, p = .001) and was not primarily influenced by costs and route of administration. First-degree relatives of axSpA patients with a clearly increased disease risk (70%) would largely consider using preventive medication. Their willingness roughly halved by the possible occurrence of side effects. Participants' perceived risk to develop SpA and their assessment of the severity of SpA negatively influenced the willingness to use preventive medication.

Barriers to lifestyle changes for prevention of cardiovascular disease - a survey among 40-60-year old Danes

Background

Elimination of modifiable risk factors including unhealthy lifestyle has the potential for prevention of 80% of cardiovascular disease cases. The present study focuses on disclosing barriers for maintaining specific lifestyle changes by exploring associations between perceiving these barriers and various sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.

Methods

Data were collected through a web-based questionnaire survey and included 962 respondents who initially accepted treatment for a hypothetical cardiovascular risk, and who subsequently stated that they preferred lifestyle changes to medication. Logistic regression was used to analyse associations between barriers to lifestyle changes and relevant covariates.

Results

A total of 45% of respondents were identified with at least one barrier to introducing 30 min extra exercise daily, 30% of respondents reported at least one barrier to dietary change, and among smokers at least one barrier to smoking cessation was reported by 62% of the respondents. The perception of specific barriers to lifestyle change depended on sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.

Conclusion

We observed a considerable heterogeneity between different social groups in the population regarding a number of barriers to lifestyle change. Our study demonstrates that social inequality exists in the ability to take appropriate preventive measures through lifestyle changes to stay healthy. This finding underlines the challenge of social inequality even in populations with equal and cost-free access to health care. Our study suggests supplementing traditional public campaigns to counter cardiovascular disease by using individualized and targeted initiatives.

Determinants of preferences for lifestyle changes versus medication and beliefs in ability to maintain lifestyle changes. A population-based survey

Preferences for medication treatment versus lifestyle changes are of major importance in the management of chronic diseases. This study aims to investigate determinants of preference for lifestyle changes versus medication for prevention of cardiovascular disease as well as determinants of respondents' beliefs in their ability to maintain lifestyle changes. A representative sample of 40-60-year old Danish inhabitants was in 2012 invited to a survey and were asked to imagine that they had been diagnosed as being at increased risk of heart disease. Subsequently they were presented with a choice between a preventive medical intervention versus lifestyle change. The study population for the present paper comprises 1069 participants. A total of 962 participants preferred lifestyle changes to medication treatment. Significant determinants for preferring lifestyle changes were female gender and high level of physical activity. Significant determinants for not opting for lifestyle changes were being self-employed, poor self-rated health and smoking. Low educational attainment, lifestyle risk factors, self-reported health-related challenges and prior experience with heart disease were associated with a low belief in ability to maintain lifestyle changes. For conclusion we found a pervasive preference for lifestyle changes over medical treatment when individuals were promised the same benefits. Lifestyle risk factors and socioeconomic characteristics were associated with preference for lifestyle changes as well as belief in ability to maintain lifestyle changes. For health professionals risk communication should not only focus on patient preferences but also on patients' beliefs in their own ability to initiate lifestyle changes and possible barriers against maintaining changes.