B-cell lymphoma in retrieved femoral heads: a long term follow up

Routine Histopathologic Examination of Bone Obtained During Elective Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty May Not Be Necessary

Background

Many institutions require the routine collection of pathology samples from every primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed. These policies are controversial, and their cost-effectiveness is difficult to define. We sought to judge the cost-effectiveness of one such policy according to World Health Organization recommendations.

Methods

We analyzed 3200 consecutive primary TKAs, comparing our presumed preoperative diagnoses against the diagnoses made by the pathologist. Diagnoses were categorized as concordant (matching), discrepant (not matching but without impact to patient management), or discordant (not matching and resulting in a direct change to patient management). An incremental cost-utility ratio analysis was performed to determine the cost-effectiveness of our institution's policy to routinely collect pathology samples from every primary TKA performed. Cost-effectiveness was defined by World Health Organization guidelines as a cost of less than $228,090 per quality-adjusted life year gained.

Results

Twelve pathology samples were lost before reaching a pathologist. From the remaining 3188 samples, we identified 3158 concordant cases, 29 discrepant diagnoses, and 1 discordant diagnosis. It cost an estimated $10,522.60 to identify each discrepant diagnosis and an estimated $305,155.36 to diagnose one discordant case in our cohort. Our incremental cost-utility ratio analysis revealed that we spent $305,155.36 to gain 0 quality-adjusted life years for our patients.

Conclusions

Routine histopathologic analysis of TKA samples was cost-ineffective in our patient cohort and may not be necessary during routine TKA.

Routine Pathologic Examination of the Femoral Head in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Survey Study of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons

Background

Current literature does not provide conclusive evidence on whether routine pathologic examination of femoral heads from total hip arthroplasty is indicated or cost-effective. As a result, there is substantial variation in opinion among surgeons related to this issue. Our study aim was to determine factors that impact surgeon propensity to order pathologic examination of femoral heads.

Methods

A 12-question survey was created to evaluate surgeon practices, indications, and patient care implications surrounding routine pathologic examination of femoral heads. The email survey was distributed to all members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (n = 2598).

Results

There were 572 survey respondents. Out of all respondents, 28.4% always send femoral heads to pathology, and 27.6% reported an institutional requirement to do so. Of the 572 surgeons, 73.6% report femoral head pathology has never resulted in a change in patient disease course. Factors that increase the likelihood of surgeons ordering femoral head pathologic examination include institutional requirements, medicolegal concern, and prior experience with femoral head pathologic examination changing patients' disease course (P < .001). Cost concern decreases the likelihood of surgeons ordering femoral head pathologic examination (P = .0012).

Conclusions

A minority of surgeons routinely send femoral heads from total hip arthroplasty for pathologic examination, mostly because of institutional requirement. The majority of surgeons feel that femoral head pathologic examination never changes patient management, although others have infrequently detected malignancy and infection. Institutional policy, concern for litigation, and prior experience with discordant pathologic diagnoses increase femoral head pathologic examinations, while cost concern decreases them.

Need, Strategies and Requirements in the Medical System for Bone Banks: A Review Article

An orthopedic bone bank's creation and management is a challenging procedure where medical organization and legal requirements interact. There are no formal regulations for the management and organization of an orthopedic bone bank in the Netherlands or any other nation in Europe. The recently revised "law of security and quality for utilizing human materials in the Netherlands establishes guidelines for the technical and administrative elements of using human tissue and cells. The bone bank's processes involve a rigorous questionnaire for choosing donors, a complete bacteriological, histological, and serological examination, as well as industry-standard, practices for registering, processing, preserving, distributing, and storing bone allografts. This article explains how an approved bone bank is run, and it may be used as a suggestion for formal regulation or as a model for additional orthopedic bone banks in Europe. Osseous graft manufacture, testing, packing, storage, and transportation are all handled by bone banks. Their primary responsibility is to guarantee the transplants' biological characteristics and microbial cleanliness by legal and quality criteria. All orthopedic surgeons face the challenge of reconstructing bone defects; to address this issue, there are several methods, including the use of autografts, allografts, and bone substitutes to enhance and speed bone recovery. Although autografts have superior biological qualities, their volume is constrained and they are linked to donor site morbidity. Allografts are readily accessible, however, there are still worries about the possibility of infections, and they lack osteosarcoma qualities.

Routine Histopathologic Analysis of Hip and Knee Bone Specimens After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Total hip and total knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA) are some of the most common elective surgeries done in the United States. Routine histopathologic analysis of hip and knee bone specimens after total joint arthroplasty commonly occurs to identify unexpected pathologic findings and serves as a quality assurance measure. As the most common indication for THA and TKA is osteoarthritis, the practice of routine histopathologic analysis may not be routinely warranted. There is no clear consensus on the cost-effectiveness of this practice, and the literature has questioned both the clinical relevance of discrepancies between surgeon diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis and raised concerns about variance in the histological evaluation of resected specimens by pathologists. Femoral head analysis in the setting of femoral neck fractures has been previously reported, yet there is no clear overview for this topic in the setting of elective THA. The histopathologic features of bone specimens during routine total joint arthroplasty, the cost-effectiveness, and current recommendations will be reviewed.

Routine Pathologic Examination of Femoral Head Specimens from Total Hip Arthroplasty May Not Be Indicated or Cost-effective: A Systematic Review

Background

There is considerable disparity in institutional practices surrounding routine pathologic examination of femoral heads removed during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Multiple groups have studied the merits of routine femoral head pathology in THA, without clear consensus. We sought to further investigate the existing evidence on routine pathologic examination of femoral heads retrieved during THA to determine if this practice provides additional clinical value and is cost-effective.

Material and methods

To conduct a systematic review of the literature, a medical librarian was consulted to develop and perform comprehensive searches in PubMed (1809-present), Embase (embase.com 1974-present), CINAHL (EBSCO, 1937-present), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Final searches resulted in 727 references. Through multiple reviewer screenings and assessments of eligible full-text articles, we included 14 articles for review.

Results

Our systematic review yielded pathologic examination results from 17,388 femoral head specimens collected during THA. In 0.85% of cases, the pathologic diagnosis differed in a meaningful way from the preoperative clinical diagnosis. Routine pathology changed patient management in approximately 0.0058% of cases. The average cost for pathologic examination of each specimen was $126.38.

Conclusion

Routine pathologic examination of femoral heads retrieved during THA has limited impact on patient management. With an estimated 500,000 THAs performed in 2019, the economic feasibility of routine femoral head pathology is limited at an annual cost of up to $63,000,000 and cost per quality-adjusted life-year approaching infinity. However, surgeon discretion on a patient-specific or practice-specific basis should be used to make the final determination on the need for femoral head pathology.

Selective pathological examination following hip arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pathological examination of the femoral head after hip arthroplasty is often performed routinely. The cost-effectiveness of the examination with regard to identifying clinically relevant diagnoses has been a point of discussion. To date, recommendations on performing pathological examination based on patient characteristics, disease history or radiographic findings are scarce. The aim of this study was to gain insight in when to select a patient for pathological examination of the femoral head by means of the following research questions: "How many clinically relevant diagnoses does selective pathological examination identify?" "Which factors contribute to selection of the femoral head for conducting pathological examination?" "What are the costs of selective pathological examination for identifying clinically relevant diagnoses?"

HYPOTHESIS

Selective pathological examination of the femoral head results in higher ratios of identified clinically relevant diagnoses against substantially lower costs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed over the period of 2010-2015. All pathological reports were collected from our hospital and screened for resected femoral heads after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or primary hemiarthroplasty (HA). The coherence between preoperative diagnosis and postoperative pathological diagnosis was defined as concordant, discrepant or discordant. The aim was to perform logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 164 patients were included of 3998 hip arthroplasties performed during the study period with a mean age of 74±12.3 years including 54 (33%) male and 110 (67%) female of whom 112 (68%) underwent THA and 52 (32%) HA. A discrepancy in diagnosis was found in nine patients (6%) and discordance in three patients (2%). The most frequently reported reasons to perform pathological examination were malignancy in medical history n=86 (53%), avascular necrosis n=22 (13%), bone abnormality perioperatively n=19 (11%) and pathological fracture n=13 (8%). The factors that identified the unexpected clinically relevant diagnoses were pathological fracture (3 cases out of 13), bone abnormality perioperatively (2 out of 19), abnormalities on preoperative radiographs (1 out of 9) and to a lesser extent malignancy in history (2 out of 86). With costs of pathological examination of approximately €163 per femoral head, performed in 164 patients, the total costs of pathological examination resulted in €26,732. The cost per discrepant case (n=9) was €2970 and the cost per discordant case (n=3) was €8910.

CONCLUSION

Selective pathological examination of the femoral head following hip arthroplasty results in higher ratios of discrepant and discordant cases against substantially lower costs. Factors that identify clinically relevant diagnoses are pathological fracture, perioperative bone abnormality, abnormalities on preoperative radiographs and to a lesser extent malignancy in history.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective cohort study.

Unexpected Primary Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma of Bone in Amputation and Arthroplasty Specimens

OBJECTIVES

Amputation due to gangrene and arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease are common orthopedic procedures and are expected to increase as populations age. Histopathologic examination of these specimens can identify unsuspected diseases.

METHODS

We reviewed gangrenous amputations and large joint arthroplasty specimens for diagnosis of unexpected lymphoma, January 2014 to January 2020. Pathology and medical records were reviewed to determine diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Five cases (0.08%) of unexpected primary extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) centered in bone were identified in 1,624 amputations for gangrene and 4,163 arthroplasty specimens. The female-to-male distribution was 3:2. Median age was 71 years (range, 62-87). The 3 cases arising in the setting of gangrene involved the first toe phalanges and metatarsals, and the femoral head was involved in all cases of joint disease (2 cases). The bone showed variable (10%-80%) infiltration by dense populations of small lymphoid cells with MZL immunophenotype. One patient died from sepsis 18.5 months after diagnosis; all others are alive with a median follow-up of 27.45 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic examination of nonneoplastic orthopedic specimens identifies unexpected primary bone extranodal MZL in a small percentage of cases. This neoplasm may be the result of chronic antigenic stimulation in some circumstances.

[A clinical radiological score for femoral head grafts : Establishment of the Tabea FK score to ensure the quality of human femoral head grafts]

INTRODUCTION

Transplantation of cancellous tissue from human femoral heads (FK) is an established method in the reconstruction of bony defects in orthopedic and trauma surgery. Standardized rating systems with respect to the morphological quality of this tissue are not available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 91/105 patients who had been a regular, clinically-indicated surgery (arthroplasty of the hip joint) the respective femoral head (FK) was taken under standardized conditions. Using a checklist defined clinical and radiological criteria of FK are judged in terms of their quality (cysts, necrosis, calcification, deformities, osteoporosis) and divided by the Tabea FK score into three classes (best/middle/poor quality). This was followed by a blinded repeated scoring, now as macroscopic assessment of three sawed layers from the same femoral head. The femoral heads are examined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and a standardized histological examination of the bony tissue. We evaluated the accordance of the Tabea FK score with complementary assessments by calculation of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Femoral heads from 91/105 patients (ages: 68.4 ± 9.9 , n = 60 women, n = 31 men) were explanted and included in the study. The correlation between the primary radiologic clinical score (Tabea FK score) and the macroscopic second review of the sawn FK with respect to middle/best and poor/middle quality was classified as good (sensitivity 77% and 81%, respectively; specificity 76% and 84%, respectively). The correlation of histology and macroscopic second review was worse and in relation to discrimination of middle/best and poor/middle quality had a sensitivity of 85% and 54%, respectively, and a specificity of 66% and 97%, respectively. The pQCT showed a sensitivity of 82% only in discrimination of middle/best, while sensitivity in discrimination of poor/middle and poor/middle + best, respectively, was <10%.

DISCUSSION

The corresponding correlation between the primary and the second clinical score was evaluated as good. This emphasizes the long-standing skills of operationally active orthopedic surgeons to classify the quality of cancellous bone correctly already on the basis of X‑ray images and intraoperative findings. In this respect, the introduction of the Tabea FK score as a quality assurance tool in the routines of bone banks can be recommended.

Examination of total hip and knee arthroplasty tissues

BACKGROUND

Many practices require tissues from hip and knee arthroplasty procedures to be sent for pathologic examination. These examinations rarely provide information beyond the clinical or radiologic diagnosis and rarely alter clinical management. We aimed to determine the rate at which histologic diagnoses based on gross assessment alone or gross plus microscopic assessment correspond with reported clinical diagnoses in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties and whether the histologic diagnoses alter patient management.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed arthroplasty cases performed at a high-volume teaching hospital in Manitoba, Canada. The clinical diagnosis was compared with the final pathology report based on gross examination, with or without histologic assessment. The results of the comparison were classified into 3 categories: concordant (same diagnosis), discrepant (different diagnoses without alterations in management) and discordant (different diagnoses resulting in management change). The overall provincial cost for pathologic examination was determined by multiplying the total examination cost by the estimated number of arthroplasty cases.

RESULTS

There were 773 patients in our study sample. The concordant rate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.1%-99.1%), the discrepant rate was 1.7% (95% CI 0.9%-2.9%) and the discordant rate was 0.0% (95% CI 0%-0.5%) for 773 cases. The pathology diagnosis did not alter patient management in any case. A total of 91.5% of specimens did not require full histologic review and received gross descriptions only. The discrepancy rate was higher in cases that included microscopic examination than in those that received only gross descriptions (15.2% v. 0.4%, p < 0.001). The overall provincial cost for pathologic examination was estimated at Can$304 556.

CONCLUSION

Submitting routine tissue from arthroplasty procedures to pathology does not affect patient management and therefore provides no value for the health care resources expended in doing so.

Surgical Management of Primary Bone Lymphoma of the Hip: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Primary bone lymphoma (PBL) is a rare bone malignancy which may present with atraumatic pain, swelling, or pathological fracture. Whilst the femur is the most commonly affected site, any bone may be involved. PBL should be distinguished from other bone lesions to determine clinical management.

Case Report

We report the case of an 89-year-old gentleman who presented to the local emergency department with atraumatic hip pain and inability to weight-bear. Multimodal imaging showed evidence of a tumor involving the proximal femur and adjacent acetabulum with an associated pathological intertrochanteric fracture. Biopsy specimens demonstrated this to be PBL of the diffuse large B-cell subtype. No other disease foci or nodal involvement was identified. The patient underwent proximal femoral replacement and acetabular reconstruction prior to commencing R-Mini-CHOP chemotherapy, during which time he has been permitted to fully weight-bear.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a patient having PBL with both femoral and acetabular involvements. Due to its infrequent occurrence, evidence remains limited to advise therapeutic guidelines. Our practice concurs with literature suggesting that surgery be reserved for cases of pathological fracture. However, the merits of undergoing surgical fixation prior to chemoradiation treatment have been considered.

Unsuspected Malignancies in Routine Femoral Head Histopathologic Examination During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

Routine femoral head histopathology during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been recently reported as a potentially useful screening tool for bone- and bone marrow-associated malignancies. However, cost-effectiveness of routine histopathology during THA remains unclear due to low prevalence of significant medical findings which alter patient management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine histopathology in diagnosing unsuspected malignancy in patients undergoing primary THA.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2011, we retrospectively analyzed routine histopathologic findings of 3200 femoral head specimens from 2725 patients that underwent primary THA. Preoperative and postoperative diagnoses were classified into concordant (clinical diagnosis concurred with pathologic diagnosis), discrepant (differing diagnosis with no resultant impact on patient management), and discordant (differing diagnosis with subsequent change in patient management). Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the incremental cost-utility ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 3055 of 3200 pathologic samples were concordant with the preoperative diagnosis (95.4%), 140 of 3200 were discrepant (4.4%), and 5 of 3200 were discordant (0.2%). Routine histopathology revealed 1 unsuspected malignancy out of 640 (5 of 3200) femoral heads. The total cost of histopathologic screening was $614,664.80. The average cost to identify a discrepant case was $4390.46, and the cost to identify a discordant case was $122,932.96. The incremental cost-utility ratio was $49,569.74 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates routine femoral head histopathology may be cost-effective in diagnosing unsuspected malignancy at $49,569.74/QALY gained (less than World Health Organization recommended threshold $159,000/QALY gained), providing useful clinical information for surgeons considering the value of routine femoral head histopathology in patients undergoing THA.

Large B-cell lymphoma mimicking iliopsoas abscess following open revision of proximal femur infected non-union: a case report

Background

Extranodal presentation of lymphoma is a rare occurrence. It has been postulated that chronic antigen stimulation may predispose a patient to the development of lymphoma.

Case presentation

We present a case report of a large extranodal B-cell lymphoma mimicking a postoperative abscess following surgery for an infected proximal femur nonunion in an 80-year-old Caucasian male of Italian descent.

Conclusions

This case highlights the need to consider malignancy in revision surgery, careful examination of operative specimens and the need for further understanding of the role of metal implants in chronic antigen stimulation.

Routine Examination of Pathology Specimens Following Knee Arthroscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

While the clinical value of routine pathologic examination of tissues removed during orthopaedic procedures has not been determined, limited cost-effectiveness and a low prevalence of findings that alter patient management have been previously demonstrated with arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of routine histological examination of knee arthroscopy specimens.

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis of 3797 consecutive knee arthroscopies by two surgeons from 2004 to 2013 at three affiliated hospitals within one health-care system was undertaken. Pathology reports regarding tissue removed during partial meniscectomies and anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were reviewed to determine if the results altered patient care. The total costs of histological examination were estimated in 2012-adjusted U.S. dollars. The cost per health effect was determined by calculating the cost per discrepant and discordant diagnosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of concordant diagnoses was 99.3% (3769 of 3797), the prevalence of discrepant diagnoses was 0.7% (twenty-seven of 3797), and the prevalence of discordant diagnoses was 0.026% (one of 3797). The total cost of histological examinations was estimated to be $371,810. The total cost of the pathology cost per discrepant diagnosis was $13,771, and the cost per discordant diagnosis was $371,810.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine pathological examination of surgical specimens from patients undergoing knee arthroscopy had limited cost-effectiveness because of the low prevalence of findings that altered patient management. Histological examination of surgical specimens from arthroscopic knee surgery did not alter patient care and increased costs. We suggest that gross and histological examination of tissue removed during knee arthroscopy should be done at the discretion of the orthopaedic surgeon rather than being mandatory.

Metal-on-metal joint bearings and hematopoetic malignancy

This is a review of the hip arthroplasty era. We concentrate on new metal bearings, surface replacements, and the lessons not learned, and we highlight recent reports on malignancies and joint implants. A low incidence of blood malignancies has been found in bone marrow taken at prosthetic surgery. The incidence is increased after replacement with knee implants that release very low systemic levels of metal ions. A carcinogenic effect of the high levels of metal ions released by large metal-on-metal implants cannot be excluded. Ongoing Swedish implant registry studies going back to 1975 can serve as a basis for evaluation of this risk.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the synovium discovered in total knee arthroplasty: a case report

Background

Musculoskeletal involvement occurs in 25% of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Primary lymphoma in the joint is rare. It can present as a bone lesion or as atypical soft tissue proliferation. NHL has an increased incidence in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Case presentation

We present a case in which non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was found coincidentally in the synovium during knee joint replacement surgery in a 69-year old woman with rheumatoid arthritis. Pigmented, vitreous tissue was resected, which turned out to be a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after histological examination. The coincidental intraoperative finding of intra-articular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was reported twice before, presenting as synovial proliferation in elbow and shoulder surgery. In a few other cases non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma presented most often in the knee, as a bone lesion or, when soft tissue was involved, as arthritis.

Conclusion

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma should be considered in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. In case of persistent arthritis, non-respondent to anti-inflammatory drugs, a biopsy might be warranted. Moreover, when arthroscopy or arthrotomy is planned, any atypical tissue should be sent for histological analysis. Early diagnosis of NHL can contribute to improved outcome of its rapidly developing treatment options.

Histologic examinations of arthroplasty specimens are not cost-effective: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Many hospitals require all operative specimens be sent to pathologists for routine examination. Although previous studies indicate this practice increases medical cost, it remains unclear whether it alters patient management and whether it is cost-effective.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore (1) determined the rate of discordance between clinical and histologic examinations of routine operative specimens during elective primary arthroplasties, (2) determined the cost of routine histologic screening, and (3) estimated its cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, as compared with gross examination or no examination.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1247 patients who underwent 1363 routine elective primary total joint arthroplasties between January 18, 2006 and March 15, 2010. We compared preoperative, postoperative, and histologic diagnoses for each patient and categorized them into three classes: concordant (clinical and histologic diagnoses agreed), discrepant (diagnoses differed but with no resultant change in treatment), and discordant (diagnoses differed with resultant change in treatment). Medicare reimbursements were determined through the pathology department's administrative office.

RESULTS

In 1363 cases, 1335 (97.9%) clinical and histologic diagnoses were concordant, 28 (2.1%) were discrepant, and none were discordant. Total reimbursement for routine pathological examination was $139,532, or $102.37 per specimen. The average cost to identify each discrepant case was $4983.29. Routine histologic examination did not alter patient management, and there was no direct gain in quality-adjusted life years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations show routine histologic examinations of routine operative specimens during elective primary arthroplasties increase medical cost but rarely alter patient management and are not cost-effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, economic and decision analyses. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Design and management of an orthopaedic bone bank in The Netherlands

The design and management of an orthopaedic bone bank is a complex process in which medical organisation and legislation intertwine. Neither in the Netherlands, nor in any other European country, there are official guidelines for the organisation and management of an orthopaedic bone bank. In the Netherlands, the recently modified 'law of security and quality for using human materials' (WVKL) dictates requirements for technical and organisational aspects for the use of human tissue and cells. The bone bank procedures include a thorough questionnaire for donor selection, extensive serological, bacteriological and histopathological examination, as well as standard procedures for registration, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of bone allografts. This article describes the organisation of an accredited bone bank and can be used as a proposition for an official guideline or can be useful as an example for other orthopaedic bone banks in Europe.

Adverse reactions and events related to musculoskeletal allografts: reviewed by the World Health Organisation Project NOTIFY

PURPOSE

The use of bone and connective tissue allografts has grown rapidly and surpassed the use of autografts in many countries. Being of human origin, bone and tendon allografts carry the risk of disease transmission and complications have been reported. As part of the Project NOTIFY led by the World Health Organisation, an effort to improve recognition, reporting, tracking and investigation of adverse outcomes of allografts was initiated, achieving a comprehensive review of associated disease transmission and failures. Those involving the use of musculoskeletal allografts are reported here. A major objective is to involve orthopaedic surgeons in the improvement of the safe use of the musculoskeletal allografts.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical literature, requested reports from surgeons in selected professional organisations and informally surveyed tissue bank organisations and selected tissue bank professionals to discover reported and unreported cases of adverse outcomes. We analysed each case to decide the likelihood that the complication was truly allograft related.

RESULTS

The efficiency of the procedures involved in bone banking and bone and tendon allograft has improved significantly during the last three decades. The evolution of the incidence of reported adverse reactions and events reflects positively on the safety of transplanted tissues. Cases of bacterial and viral transmission by bone and tendon allografts occurred mainly with those that contained viable cells, were not processed to remove cells, or were not disinfected or sterilised. We documented cases of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV), unspecified hepatitis, tuberculosis and other bacteria. Reporting of these adverse outcomes has led to corrective actions and has significantly improved the safety of allograft use. However, it is probable that not all cases have been reported and investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the high quality standards achieved in many countries, the best approach for further improvement in the safety of allografts is through a systematic reporting of all serious adverse reactions and events in the context of a global biovigilance programme.

Histopathology of femoral head donations: a retrospective review of 6161 cases

BACKGROUND

Although total hip arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopaedic surgical procedures, it remains unclear whether histopathological examination of the excised femoral head adds to the quality of patient care. We propose that assessment of femoral heads resected during total hip arthroplasty and donated for allograft use may provide a profile of femoral head pathology that benefits total hip arthroplasty patients and bone donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the histological findings reported for 6161 femoral heads donated for allograft use between 1993 and 2006. Specimens obtained during total hip arthroplasty and specimens donated at death were reviewed. Follow-up investigations that resulted from abnormal histopathological findings were also reviewed. The Western Australian Cancer Registry was used to determine whether patients with a suspected neoplasm were subsequently diagnosed with such a disease. A retrospective review of the histopathological findings was conducted to evaluate and reclassify all previous observations of abnormalities.

RESULTS

One hundred and five femoral heads demonstrated abnormal or reactive histopathological features not reported prior to surgery and were rejected for allograft use. A reactive lymphocytic infiltrate, most likely due to osteoarthritis, was the most commonly identified feature (forty-five cases). Other features observed in twenty-seven cases were also most likely due to the presence of severe osteoarthritis. Ten femoral heads demonstrated plasmacytosis, which may have been related to osteoarthritis. Two patients were diagnosed with Paget's disease, and two, with rheumatoid arthritis. Nineteen patients had a suspected neoplasm. Of these nineteen, eight cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia and one case of myelodysplastic syndrome were confirmed on further investigation. One subsequently confirmed malignancy was detected per 770 femoral heads examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that, even with a detailed medical history and careful physical examination, clinically important diseases including neoplasms and Paget's disease are observed in patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty. Histological examination plays an integral role in quality assurance in femoral head banking, and it also represents a possible early diagnostic test for bone and bone-marrow-related diseases in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

The use of poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) as a scaffold for adipose stem cells in bone tissue engineering: application in a spinal fusion model

Since the early 1990s, tissue engineering has been heralded as a strategy that may solve problems associated with bone grafting procedures. The original concept of growing bone in the laboratory, however, has proven illusive due to biological, logistic, and regulatory problems. Fat-derived stem cells and synthetic polymers open new, more practicable routes for bone tissue engineering. In this paper, we highlight the potential of poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) to serve as a radiolucent scaffold in bone tissue engineering. It appears that PLCL quickly and preferentially binds adipose stem cells (ASCs), which proliferate rapidly and eventually differentiate into the osteogenic phenotype. An in vivo spinal fusion study in a goat model provides a preclinical proof-of-concept for a one-step surgical procedure with ASCs in bone tissue engineering.