Comparison of two-stage open versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis

Minimally Invasive versus Traditional Surgery: Efficacy of PELD and PLIF in Treating Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is infection of the intervertebral disc or discs and the adjacent vertebrae. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar debridement (PELD) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in 40 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD). MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical records of patients who underwent PELD (n=18) or PLIF (n=22) for PSD between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. The recorded outcomes encompassed surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measurements, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, duration of hospitalization, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, lumbar sagittal parameters, and the incidence of complications. RESULTS The PELD group had shorter surgical duration, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay compared to the PLIF group (P<0.01). At the last follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in ESR, CRP levels, and ASIA classification (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The PELD group had lower ODI and VAS ratings at 1 month and 3 months, respectively (P<0.01). The PLIF group had significant improvements in intervertebral space height and lumbar lordosis angle (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Both PLIF and PELD surgical approaches demonstrate adequate clinical efficacy in the treatment of monosegmental PSD. PLIF can better ensure more spinal stability than PELD, but PELD offers advantages such as reduced minimal surgical trauma, shorter operative duration, and faster recovery after surgery.

Pedicle screw insertion into infected vertebrae reduces operative time and range of fixation in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive posterior fixation surgery for pyogenic spondylitis is known to reduce invasiveness and complication rates; however, the outcomes of concomitant insertion of pedicle screws (PS) into the infected vertebrae via the posterior approach are undetermined. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of PS insertion into infected vertebrae in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 70 patients undergoing minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis across nine institutions. Patients were categorized into insertion and skip groups based on PS insertion into infected vertebrae, and surgical data and postoperative outcomes, particularly unplanned reoperations due to complications, were compared.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 70 patients was 72.8 years. The insertion group (n = 36) had shorter operative times (146 versus 195 min, p = 0.032) and a reduced range of fixation (5.4 versus 6.9 vertebrae, p = 0.0009) compared to the skip group (n = 34). Unplanned reoperations occurred in 24% (n = 17) due to surgical site infections (SSI) or implant failure; the incidence was comparable between the groups. Poor infection control necessitating additional anterior surgery was reported in four patients in the skip group.

CONCLUSIONS

PS insertion into infected vertebrae during minimally invasive posterior fixation reduces the operative time and range of fixation without increasing the occurrence of unplanned reoperations due to SSI or implant failure. Judicious PS insertion in patients with minimal bone destruction in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis can minimize surgical invasiveness.

Outcomes of Dorsolumbar and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis Treated by Minimally Invasive and Open Techniques: A Prospective Comparative Study

Purpose of Study

To compare the outcomes of minimally invasive and open techniques in the surgical management of dorsolumbar and lumbar spinal tuberculosis (STB).

Methods

Skeletally mature patients with active STB involving thoracolumbar and lumbar region confirmed by radiology (X-ray, MRI) and histopathological examination were included. Healed and mechanically stable STB, patients having severe hepatic and renal impairment, coexisting spinal conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis, and patients unwilling to participate were excluded from the study. The patients were divided in to two groups, group A consisted of patients treated by MIS techniques and group B consisted of patients treated by open techniques. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 24 months.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included in the study. MIS techniques were used in 18 patients and open techniques were used in 24 patients. On comparison between the two groups, blood loss (234 ml vs 742 ml), and immediate post-operative VAS score (5.26 vs 7.08) were significantly better in group A, whereas kyphotic correction (16° vs 33.25°) was significantly better in group B. Rest of the parameters such as duration of surgery, VAS score, ODI score and number of instrumented levels did not show significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

MIS stabilization when compared to open techniques is associated with significant improvement in immediate post-operative VAS scores. The MIS approaches at 2-year follow-up have functional results similar to open techniques. MIS is inferior to open techniques in kyphosis correction and may be associated with complications.

Surgical strategies for spinal infections: A narrative review

The successful operative management of spinal infections necessitates a thoughtful approach. Ideal treatment combines the universal goals of any spine operation, which are decompression of the neural elements and stabilization of instability, with source control and eradication of infection. Techniques to treat infection have evolved independently and alongside advances in implant technology and surgical techniques. This review will seek to outline current thinking on approaches to both primary and secondary spinal infections.

Single Posterior Approach for Circumferential Debridement and Anterior Reconstruction Using Fibular Allograft in Patients With Skipped Multifocal Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

OBJECTIVE

Skipped multifocal pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a rare presentation of spinal infection. In our institution, we used the single posterior approach for circumferential debridement and anterior reconstruction with fibular allograft for treatment. This study aimed to ascertain the viability and reliability of this technique for these difficult cases.

METHODS

Nine patients with skipped pyogenic spondylodiscitis who received our treatment method from January 2012 to December 2019 were enrolled in this study. Visual analog scale scores, causative agents, laboratory data, comorbidities, and complications were recorded. The patients' clinical conditions were evaluated based on modified Brodsky's criteria, visual analogue scale, and Oswestry Disability Index.

RESULTS

All the patients achieved infection eradication without repeat surgical treatment. The average visual analog scale score was 8.4 (range, 8-9) before operation, which decreased to 1.9 (range, 1-3) 1 year after the surgery. No patient experienced severe complications such as neurologic deterioration or fixation failure. All patients achieved a good or excellent outcome based on modified Brodsky's criteria. The Oswestry Disability Index improved from 80.4 (range, 70-86) preoperatively to 25.1 (range, 20-32) 1 year after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In our case series, good clinical outcomes and high successful rates could be achieved through the single-stage posterior-only approach. This could be considered an alternative method to manage patients with skipped pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare percutaneous (PPS) versus open pedicle screw (OPS) fixation for treatment of thoracic and lumbar spondylodiscitis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine can produce instability, deformity, and/or neurological compromise. When medical treatment is unsuccessful, surgical treatment is indicated, with the conventional open approach the usual standard of care. However, percutaneous techniques can be advantageous in medically vulnerable patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, looking for comparative articles on pyogenic spondylodiscitis requiring surgical stabilization with pedicle screws. This systematic review is reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

From 215 articles initially identified, 7 retrospective studies were analyzed, encapsulating an overall sample of 722 patients: 405 male (56.1%) and 317 female (43.9%). The treatment modality was PPS fixation in 342 patients (47.4%) and OPS fixation in 380 (52.6%). For PPS, operating time was 29.75 minutes ( P <0.0001), blood loss 390.18 mL ( P <0.00001), postoperative pain 1.54 points ( P <0.00001), and length of stay 4.49 days ( P =0.001) less than with OPS fixation, and wound infection 7.2% ( P =0.003) less frequent. No difference in screw misplacement ( P =0.94) or loosening ( P =0.33) rates was observed.

CONCLUSION

Employing PPS fixation to treat pyogenic spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine is associated with significantly reduced operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, length of stay, and rates of wound infection than OPS fixation, with no difference between the 2 treatments in rates of screw misplacement or screw loosening.

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Pyogenic Spondylitis with Minimally Invasive Posterior Fixation without Anterior Lesion Debridement or Bone Grafting: A Multicenter Case Study

The usefulness of minimally invasive posterior fixation without debridement and autogenous bone grafting remains unknown. This multicenter case series aimed to determine the clinical outcomes and limitations of this method for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis. Patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis treated with minimally invasive posterior fixation alone were retrospectively evaluated at nine affiliated hospitals since April 2016. The study included 31 patients (23 men and 8 women; mean age, 73.3 years). The clinical course of the patients and requirement of additional anterior surgery constituted the study outcomes. The postoperative numerical rating scale score for lower back pain was significantly smaller than the preoperative score (5.8 vs. 3.6, p = 0.0055). The preoperative local kyphosis angle was 6.7°, which was corrected to 0.1° after surgery and 3.7° at the final follow-up visit. Owing to failed infection control, three patients (9.6%) required additional anterior debridement and autogenous bone grafting. Thus, in this multicenter case series, a large proportion of patients with thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis could be treated with minimally invasive posterior fixation alone, thereby indicating it as a treatment option for pyogenic spondylitis.

A modified minimally invasive surgery for thoracic pyogenic spondylitis: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in combination with a vertebral debridement in a separate posterolateral approach-A case report

In this report, we present a successfully treated case of intractable thoracic pyogenic spondylitis using one-step curettage/bone grafting of spinal anterior segment and less-contaminated percutaneous spinal posterior fixation via separated posterior approaches, which was not compatible with conventional spinal instruments.

Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: A 23-Case Series and Review of Literature

Background and Objectives: The incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis has been increasing due to the aging of the population. Although surgical treatment is performed for refractory pyogenic spondylodiscitis, surgical invasiveness should be considered. Recent minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) can be a less invasive approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical results and clinical outcomes after MISt with PPS for pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Materials and Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent MISt with PPS for pyogenic spondylitis were analyzed. Results: Twenty-three patients (18 male, 5 female, mean age 67.0 years) were retrospectively enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 15.9 months after surgery. The causative organism was identified in 16 cases (69.6%). A mean number of fixed vertebrae was 4.1, and the estimated blood loss was 145.0 mL. MISt with PPS was successfully performed in 19 of 23 patients (82.6%). Four cases (17.4%) required additional anterior debridement and autologous iliac bone graft placement. CRP levels had become negative at an average of 28.4 days after surgery. There was no major perioperative complication and no screw or rod breakages during follow-up. Conclusions: MISt with PPS would be a less invasive approach for pyogenic spondylodiscitis in elderly or immunocompromised patients.

Secondary Infection/Microbial Substitution in a Managed Case of Pyogenic Spondylitis

Pyogenic spondylitis is a challenging condition that requires early and accurate diagnosis for appropriate treatment. Most cases can be treated non-surgically or with minimally invasive surgical procedures; however, a combination of anterior debridement/bone grafting and posterior fixation is necessary for severe cases. We encountered a case of lumbar pyogenic spondylitis treated with anterior debridement and autogenous bone grafting after percutaneous endoscopic discectomy drainage (PEDD) with percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation. The continuous pus oozing from the PEDD drainage tube wound was characteristic in this case, and the pus was considered to be caused by secondary infection/microbial substitution. The discharge immediately stopped and healed after anterior debridement and autogenous bone grafting. Escherichia coli was first detected as the causative bacterium, and Corynebacterium amycolatum and Corynebacterium striatum were detected as the cause of secondary infection/microbial substitution. The possibility of secondary infection/microbial substitution should be considered when the clinical course worsens.

Minimally invasive posterior pedicle screw fixation versus open instrumentation in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

Due to the aging society, the incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is still rising. Although surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis in general is increasingly accepted, an optimal surgical strategy for treatment of pyogenic spinal infection has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation for surgical treatment in patients with spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine between January 2017 and December 2019. We assessed intraoperative and clinical data, comparing for the classic open and the percutaneous approach. In total, we analyzed 125 cases (39 female, 86 male). The mean age was 69.49 years ± 12.63 years.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (37.6%) patients were operated on by a percutaneous approach for pedicle screw fixation, and 78 (62.4%) received open surgery. There was no significant difference in the mean age of patients between both groups (p= 0.57). The time of surgery for percutaneous fixation was statistically significantly shorter (p= 0.03). Furthermore, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (p < 0.001). No significant difference could be observed regarding the recurrence rate of spondylodiscitis and the occurrence of surgical site infections (p= 0.2 and 0.5, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation appears to be a feasible option for the surgical treatment of a selected patient group with spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Skipping Pedicle Screw Insertion Into Infected Vertebra is a Risk Factor for Revision Surgery for Pyogenic Spondylitis in the Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Surgical intervention for pyogenic spondylitis is indicated when conservative treatment fails and biomechanical instability persists. Whether to insert pedicle screws into all vertebrae, including the most erosive vertebrae, or whether to skip 1 vertebra in pedicle screw insertion remains controversial.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cohort study was conducted in consecutive patients with pyogenic spondylitis in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine (T9-S1) between January 2008 and December 2016. The patients were treated with interbody fusion plus posterior stabilization using pedicle screws and were divided into 2 groups as follows: (1) patients in whom 1 vertebra, usually the most erosive, was skipped in pedicle screw insertion (Group Skipping) and (2) pedicle screw insertion into all vertebrae (Group All). Patients' operation data were evaluated, and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, past histories, blood loss, operation time, the presence of abscesses, or operative approach.

RESULTS

The length of fixation was greater by 1 vertebral level in the Group Skipping than in the Group All, and the rate of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis was higher in the Group Skipping than in the Group All (P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of the mean segmental lordotic angle or Barthel Index.

CONCLUSIONS

Skipping pedicle screw insertion for pyogenic spondylitis in posterior fixation led to an increased number of fixed vertebrae and may be a risk factor for revision surgery for pseudarthrosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The insertion of short pedicle screws at the infected vertebra can prevent early treatment failure and increase the biomechanical stability of construct.

There is no difference in perioperative results between posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in adults. A multicenter surveillance study from the German Spine Registry (DWG-Register)

BACKGROUND

Primary spondylodiscitis is a medically challenging disease that can lead to recurrent back pain, progressive kyphotic deformity, and neurologic deficits. The incidence rate of primary non-tuberculosis spondylodiscitis has been estimated from 2.2 to 2.4 cases per 100,000 person-years, and it has been reported to be increasing because of the aging population. The objectives were to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation (PI) with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in the treatment of primary spondylodiscitis by comparing perioperative data, functional outcomes, and overall infection-free survival.

METHODS

Analysis of data from the DWG registry on patients who have undergone posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis from the thoracolumbar junction to S1 (Th10-S1) at 10 institutions from January 2012 to December 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 420 posterior instrumentations with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in the thoracolumbar junction to S1 were identified in the registry; n=138 were exclusively percutaneous posterior instrumented (PPI), while n=102 underwent open posterior instrumentation (OPI) without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement and n=180 OPI with interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement. Clinical evaluation after surgery did not show a significant difference between groups including improvement of the mbilisation and infection-free survival. However, with PPI the duration of operation and blood loss was significantly less than OPI with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement as not indispensable for treatment in primary spondylodiscitis. Therefore, we encourage the use of posterior stabilization alone in the treatment of spondylodiscitis as less invasive procedure reducing costs in instrumentation.

[Spondylodiscitis]

Spondylodiscitis is an infection of the spine that first affects the vertebral endplates ("spondylitis") and then spreads to the adjacent intervertebral disc ("spondylodiscitis"). As it is a potentially life-threatening systemic disease rapid, often surgical treatment is required. Due to the multimorbidity of the patients and the complexity of the therapy, a multidisciplinary approach is essential. The vast majority of the cases heals under conservative therapy. An absolute indication for surgical therapy is given for acute septic courses or if there are new relevant neurological deficits. In addition, urgent surgical treatment is required for epidural abscesses that can be diagnosed by means of magnetic resonance imaging. In developed countries, over 90% of all spondylodiscitis cases come to a complete recovery.

Posterior Grade 4 Osteotomy With Vertebral Shortening Is Effective for the Treatment of Kyphosis Associated With Vertebral Discitis/Osteomyelitis

Background

In the retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database, we present a case series of patients with kyphotic deformity secondary to spinal infection treated using a posterior-only approach with 3-column shortening and posterior instrumentation.

Methods

This is a case series of patients presenting with postural deformity and sagittal imbalance treated consecutively by 1 surgeon between 2012 and 2014. Clinical assessments and radiographic evaluations were made preoperatively and at 12- and 24-month postoperative follow-ups. All patients underwent computed tomography 24 months after surgery to evaluate spinal fusion.

Results

The study included 5 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range, 32-60 years). Three patients had comorbidities. Three patients were classified as American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade C and were not ambulatory; 2 were ASIA grade D. At follow-up, all patients were ambulatory and classified as ASIA grade E. Kyphosis was corrected from a preoperative mean of 32° (range, 15°-58°) to 10° (range, 1°-42°) at the 2-year follow-up. A mean improvement of 22° and 75% reduction in kyphosis was obtained with fixation 2 levels above and below the lesion. Interbody fusion was observed in all patients. No major complications occurred during surgery.

Conclusions

Posterior grade 4 osteotomy with vertebral shortening can be performed safely in patients with kyphosis associated with vertebral discitis/osteomyelitis in the thoracolumbar region. The single approach allowed the surgeon to debride the infection, correct the kyphosis, decompress the spinal canal, and stabilize the spine.

Level of Evidence

4.

Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Spondylodiscitis and Vertebral Osteomyelitis

OBJECTIVE

Spondylodiscitis and vertebral osteomyelitis cause significant morbidity and mortality, and typically occur in patients with multiple comorbidities. The use of minimally invasive spinal surgery in the previous decade has offered the advantages of reduced intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pain for patients. In the present report, we have described our experience with using a hybrid minimally invasive (HMI) technique (combining percutaneous fixation with a mini-open approach for decompression and debridement) for the treatment of thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis, reporting the patient demographics, intraoperative measures, and 12-month outcomes.

METHODS

The data from patients presenting to a tertiary referral neurosurgical center with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis and osteomyelitis who had undergone HMI from 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, intraoperative factors, estimated blood loss, and immediate postoperative complications were recorded. The patient outcomes were evaluated using EuroQOL 5-dimension questionnaire and visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period and at 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients were included in the present study, 12 with spontaneous infection and 1 with infection secondary to recent microdiscectomy at another institution. All the patients had systemic comorbidities with an American Society of Anesthesiologists class of ≥2. Of the 13 patients, 11 had pyogenic infections and 2 had spinal tuberculosis. The mean estimated blood loss was 546.2 mL. The mean time for patients to sit out of bed was 2.2 days, and the mean time to start mobilizing was 4.5 days. The EuroQOL 5-dimension questionnaire scores showed improvement in all modalities at 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, HMI was a safe and effective treatment of thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis, with the potential benefits of reduced blood loss, operative duration, and postoperative pain.

Haematogenous Spondylodiscitis in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: Case Series of 36 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of 36 liver cirrhosis patients presenting with spondylodiscitis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of spondylodiscitis in the presence of liver cirrhosis and furthermore, to evaluate the outcome of surgery in this specific group of patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The incidence of haematogenous spondylodiscitis is increasing. The coexistence of liver cirrhosis makes the course of the disease more aggressive.

METHODS

A total of 36 liver cirrhosis patients presented with haematogenous spondylodiscitis. The onset of infection, clinical course and outcomes of management were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The associated comorbidities were cardiac in 17 patients, diabetes in 19, renal insufficiency in 16, and another focus for infection in nine cases. Neurological deficits were found in 24 patients (67%) and fever in 15 cases. Nine patients had septic manifestations. The lumbar spine was affected in 25 patients (69%). Noncontiguous spinal infection was found in nine patients (25%) and epidural abscess in 24 individuals. The preoperative C-reactive protein was elevated in all cases. The causative organism was most commonly Staphylococcus aureus (17 patients). A combined anteroposterior approach was necessary in 28 patients and a minimallly invasive surgery was performed in 30 cases. In-hospital mortality was 14% (5 patients). The neurological improvement rate was 82%. The postoperative antibiotic therapy was taken for more than 8 weeks in 22 patients. In 15 patients, a combination of antibiotics was necessary.

CONCLUSION

Spinal infection in the presence of liver cirrhosis is challenging. The rate epidural abscess formation is relatively high. Early diagnosis remains the main cornerstone in the management and the indication for surgery should be carefully considered. Minimally invasive techniques should be used when possible to minimize complication rate, and higher amounts of intraoperative blood loss should be expected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Percutaneous endoscopic debridement with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

To access the feasibility and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic debridement (PED) combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the treatment of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

Forty-five patients diagnosed as pyogenic spondylodiscitis underwent PPSF followed by PED. A drainage catheter was left in place for negative pressure drainage. Adequate systematic antibiotics were administered empirically or based on bacterial culture results. Clinical outcomes were assessed by physical examination, regular serologic testing, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and imaging studies.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 110.1 ± 21.2 minutes (range 80-165 minutes), with intra-operative blood loss 47.8 ± 21.0 ml (range 20-120 ml). All patients reported relief of back pain, able to sit up, and partially ambulate the next day. Causative pathogens were identified in 32 of 45 biopsy specimens, staphylococcal bacteria being the most prevalent strain. However, there were 13 patients with post-operative complications. During 6-12 months' follow-up, inflammatory markers showed infection controlled. VAS and ODI values were significantly improved.

DISCUSSION

Satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes were achieved in our patients post-operatively. It is recommended that PED plus PPSF can be another alternative for spondylodiscitis.

CONCLUSION

PED supplementing PPSF offers a valid option in treating spondylodiscitis, as it is minimally invasive, shortens hospital stay, and avoids prolonged bed rest with an optimistic outcome.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous instrumentation combined with antibiotic treatment in spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with spondylodiscitis are treated with antibiotics and braces for 6 to 12 weeks. Braces aim to decrease pain and prevent kyphotic deformity due to vertebral body collapse. Percutaneous instrumentation could be an alternative to influence pain and patient's autonomy.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze back pain, quality of life, sagittal deformity, and complications after percutaneous instrumentation in spondylodiscitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

VAS for back pain, EQ-5D, radiographic sagittal index were assessed retrospectively for 28 patients who had a standardized follow-up at 5 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 and 2 years. Probabilities>0.95 indicated significant changes (Bayesian model).

RESULTS

VAS was 7.0 preoperatively, 3.2 (day 5), 2.2 (6 weeks), 1.9 (3 months), 1.6 (1 year), 1.4 (2 years): probabilities>0.95 within 6 weeks. EQ-5D was 0.229 preoperatively, 0.563 (6 weeks), 0.687 (3 months), 0.755 (1 year), 0.787 (2 years): probabilities>0.95 within 1 year. Sagittal index was 15.1° preoperatively, 9.6° postoperatively: probability>0.95. Inter-body fusion was: complete 60.7%, partial 17.9%, and nonunion 21.4%. Antibiotic treatment was stopped at 6 weeks in 82.1%, at 3 months in 17.9%, without septic complication.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous instrumentation improved pain control, quality of life and prevented kyphosis. Antibiotic treatment was not influenced. Septic complications were not observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The analysis of percutaneous pedicle screw technique with guide wire-less in lateral decubitus position following extreme lateral interbody fusion

Background

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and bilateral percutaneous pedicle fixation are valuable, minimally invasive lateral approaches used to treat symptomatic degenerative disc disease. In the current procedure, the patient’s position on the operating table is changed after LLIF surgery from the lateral decubitus to the prone position. The ability to perform both approaches with the patient in the same position should reduce operation time. Use of a guide wire is problematic during percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion using fluoroscopy with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. A new guide wire-less PPS system may solve this problem and reduce operation time. Here, we evaluated the operative data and efficacy for this technique.

Methods

This study included 30 patients (aged 70.8 ± 8.5 years; 17 men, 13 women) who underwent a combined operation (indirect decompression) using extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) with only a single level for lumbar spinal canal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Patient demographics and operative data were compared between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation (L group) and those turned to the prone position (P group). Radiographic assessment was performed using pre- and postoperative anteroposterior and lateral lumbar films with measurement of lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, and segmental translation.

Results

We analyzed 18 patients in the P group and 12 in the L group. Age, sex, height, body weight, body mass index, estimated blood loss, and length of stay did not differ between groups. The operation time was 34 min shorter for the L group (P group 111.9 ± 25.0 vs. L group 77.5 ± 22.2 min, p < 0.01). Pre- and postoperative lordosis, segmental lordosis, and segmental translation did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions

A single position after XLIF surgery is a feasible modification to the standard procedure when used with fluoroscopy and a guide wire-less PPS system. The time saved is the main advantage of inserting the PPS with the patient in the lateral decubitus position without repositioning. Use of the lateral PPS with a guide wire-less technique may help improve operative efficiency and reduce cost.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Antibiotics Delivered by CaSO4 Drug Carrier System for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

Spondylodiscitis is a challenging spinal disorder that requires surgical treatment only as a last resort. The use of various procedures and instruments remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we reported the safety and efficacy of a CaSO₄ drug carrier system for the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure for lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with lumbar spondylodiscitis underwent TLIF. CaSO₄ beads carrying vancomycin and gentamycin were implanted in the trajectory of screws and disc spaces. We measured markers of inflammation, scores of neurologic recovery, and quality of life. The fusion status was assessed at final follow-up and the correction of local and total lordotic angle was calculated.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for at least 12 months (range, 12-24 months). At 3 months follow-up, C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate returned to normal with no relapse. Nineteen patients with American Spinal Injury Association grade D preoperatively returned to American Spinal Injury Association grade E. The improvement on the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index was 66.9% and 84.9%, respectively. At 12 months follow-up, 67.6% of patients achieved definitive union. The corrections of total and local lordotic angle were 10.02° ± 8.77° and 7.7° ± 8.75°, respectively. The rate of achievement of satisfactory Kirkaldy-Willis functional criteria was 85.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of single-level TLIF with a CaSO₄ drug delivery system was safe and effective for treatment of pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis. The system promoted reduction of inflammation with limited fixed segments without a negative impact on fusion status. This procedure may be considered a novel choice for spondylodiscitis, with more efficacy and less invasion.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Debridement and Fusion with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Spondylodiscitis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion (MiTLIDF) with percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation (PSI) is a less invasive treatment for lumbar spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

Patients with single-level lumbar spondylodiscitis were surgically treated by interbody debridement and fusion through an anterior or transforaminal approach combined with open or percutaneous PSI (group A: anterior debridement and interbody fusion with open posterior PSI; group B: transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion [TLIDF] with open posterior PSI; group C: anterior debridement and interbody fusion with percutaneous PSI; group D: MiTLIDF with percutaneous PSI). Perioperative data, fusion status, infection-free survival, and clinical outcome measurements were compared among the 4 surgical groups.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were included in this study. TLIDF was associated with shorter operative time when compared with the anterior approach (group A: 302.8 ± 59.9 minutes; group B: 209.2 ± 31.0 minutes; group C: 260.6 ± 62.5 minutes; group D: 207.1 ± 33.6 minutes; P < 0.001). Percutaneous PSI resulted in less intraoperative blood loss (group A: 907.5 ± 253.7 mL; group B: 859.4 ± 201.2 mL; group C: 532.9 ± 193.7 mL; group D: 399.1 ± 84.3 mL) and reduced immediate postoperative pain (group A: 5.5 ± 0.9; group B: 4.9 ± 0.9; group C: 3.9 ± 0.7; group D: 3.2 ± 0.7) than open PSI (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of overall infection-free survival (P = 0.936).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated MiTLIDF with percutaneous PSI is a safe and effective treatment for lumbar spondylodiscitis while incurring no adverse effects in terms of fusion rate, functional recovery, and infection eradication.

The use of CaSO4 drug delivery system in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spinal brucellosis

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of human brucellosis has risen dramatically in China with few reports regarding the operation on spinal brucellosis. In this retrospective study we introduced CaSO₄drug delivery system into the TLIF surgical procedure and evaluated its clinical effectiveness and feasibility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

36 patients with lumbar brucellosis were enrolled and treated by posterior transforaminal decompression, instrumentation and fusion. Prepared CaSO₄ beads carrying doxycycline were placed into the disc space and around pedicle screws. The activity of infection and pain-related function scales were recorded. Neurologic and functional recovery was evaluated using ASIA and Kirkaldy-Willis scale. Segmental and overall lordotic angles were measured and fusion status was assessed at final follow up.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 15.6 ± 3.73 months. The level of ESR and CRP returned to normal at 3 months post-op. 14 patients with ASIA grade D pre-op returned ASIA grade E with 3 months. The improvement of VAS and ODI was 82% and 85.8% at 3 months post-op. The corrections of segmental and overall lordotic angle were 5.98 ± 3.54° and 6.24 ± 7.93°. 69% of patients reached definitive union at 12 months after surgery. The satisfactory rate on Kirkaldy-Willis functional outcome criteria was 88.9%.

CONCLUSION

The use of CaSO₄ drug delivery system during single-stage TLIF for spinal brucellosis was safe and showed no negative impacts on fusion status and neurological function recovery. Our results are promising and the drug delivery system may be considered as a choice for future treatment in spinal brucellosis or other spondylodiscitis.

Adaptation and limitation of anterior column reconstruction for pyogenic spondylitis in lower thoracic and lumbar spine

BACKGROUND

Surgical strategy for pyogenic spondylitis is controversial when vertebral body erosion is severe. Radical debridement and anterior column reconstruction is indicated for the purpose of early ambulatory to prevent secondary complication for long bed rest. However, such aggressive debridement and risk of perioperative complications are trade-off. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factor of poor prognosis after anterior column debridement and reconstruction for pyogenic spondylitis in lower thoracic and lumbar spine.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 40 patients diagnosed with pyogenic spondylitis in lower thoracic and lumbar spine who were introduced to our institution due to losing ambulatory ability and underwent anterior column debridement and reconstruction between January 2008 and May 2016. After the patient population was split into a regaining ambulatory group (Group A; n = 23) and a poor prognosis group (Group P; n = 17), we used Fisher exact tests and t-tests as appropriate for univariate analyses to compare patient characteristics and outcomes between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that the significant variables were massive bleeding (>2000 ml) (P < 0.01), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3 (P = 0.01), and two-stage surgery needed (P = 0.04). Logistic regression analysis showed that the factors associated with poor prognosis were massive bleeding (Odds Ratio 11.9; 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 119.7; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Massive bleeding was associated with poor prognosis after debridement followed by anterior column reconstruction for pyogenic spondylitis in lower thoracic and lumbar spine.

Presentation and Outcomes After Medical and Surgical Treatment Versus Medical Treatment Alone of Spontaneous Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to (1) describe the clinical features, disabilities, and incidence of neurologic deficits of pyogenic spondylodiscitis prior to treatment and (2) compare the functional outcomes between patients who underwent medical treatment alone or in combination with surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines. No year restriction was put in place. Statistical analysis of pooled data, when documented in the original report (ie, number of patients with desired variable and number of patients evaluated), was conducted to determine the most common presenting symptoms, incidence of pre- and postoperative neurologic deficits, associated comorbidities, infectious pathogens, approach for surgery when performed, and duration of hospitalization. Outcomes data, including return to work status, resolution of back pain, and functional recovery were also pooled among all studies and surgery-specific studies alone. Meta-analysis of studies with subgroup analysis of pain-free outcome in surgical and medical patients was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty of 1286 studies were included, comprising 4173 patients undergoing either medical treatment alone or in combination with surgery. Back pain was the most common presenting symptom, reported in 91% of patients. Neurologic deficit was noted in 31% of patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly reported pathogen, seen in 35% of reported cases. Decompression and fusion was the most commonly reported surgical procedure, performed in 80% of the surgically treated patients. Combined anterior-posterior procedures and staged surgeries were performed in 33% and 26% of surgeries, respectively. The meta-analysis comparing visual analog scale score at follow-up was superior among patients receiving surgery over medical treatment alone (mean difference -0.61, CI -0.90 to -0.25), while meta-analysis comparing freedom from pain in patients receiving medical treatment alone versus combined medical and surgical treatment demonstrated superior pain-free outcomes among surgical series (odds ratio 5.35, CI 2.27-12.60, P < .001), but was subject to heterogeneity among studies (I ² = 56%, P = .13). Among all patients, freedom from pain was achieved in 79% of patients, and an excellent outcome was achieved in 73% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Medical management remains first-line treatment of infectious pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Surgery may be indicated for progressive pain, persistent infection on imaging, deformity or neurologic deficits. If surgery is required, reported literature shows potential for significant pain reduction, improved neurologic function and a high number of patients returning to a normal functional/work status.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous suction aspiration and drainage for the treatment of infective spondylodiscitis with paravertebral or epidural abscess

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patients with infective spondylodiscitis who failed conservative treatment are generally indicated for open surgery. However, some patients are poor candidates for standard surgery, hence the need to evaluate less invasive approaches. Good outcomes were previously reported for percutaneous suction aspiration and drainage (PSAD) in the treatment of infective spondylodiscitis resistant to conservative therapy. We recently extended the surgical approach of PSAD to allow drainage of paravertebral or epidural abscesses in patients with progressive infective spondylodiscitis.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of PSAD for infective spondylodiscitis with paravertebral or epidural abscess.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with infective spondylodiscitis and associated epidural or paravertebral abscess treated using PSAD at our institution, between 1998 and 2014.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and imaging data obtained via plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed. Serum measurements were taken preoperatively and at several time points postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the modified MacNab criteria for overall functional mobility.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the patients' case notes, radiological images, and medical records. Student t test was used to assess the relevance of changes in serum levels of CRP and ESR at each evaluated time point, as well as the change in sagittal Cobb angle between the preoperative state and the state at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (31 men and 21 women; average age, 70.6 years) were included in our analysis. The median (range) CRP levels and ESR values at the time of diagnosis were 6.86 (0.04-20.15) mg/dL and 78.8 (26-120) mm/h, respectively. At 1 year postoperatively, these values had decreased to 0.18 (0.0-1.2) mg/dL and 13.8 (4-28) mm/h for CRP and ESR, respectively. At final follow-up, bone union was observed in 80.8% (42 of 52) of patients, with instability identified in five patients. Regarding functional mobility, excellent outcomes were obtained in 26.9% (14 of 52) of patients, whereas good, fair, and poor outcomes were noted in 42.3% (22 of 52), 3.9% (2 of 52), and 26.9% (14 of 52) of patients, respectively. Overall, treatment was considered effective in 69.2% (36 of 52) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous suction aspiration and drainage can serve as an effective alternative to open surgery for the treatment of patients with progressive infective spondylodiscitis and associated paravertebral or epidural abscess.

Bioactive pedicle screws prepared by chemical and heat treatments improved biocompatibility and bone-bonding ability in canine lumbar spines

Background

Titanium (Ti)-6Al-4V alloy, which is widely used in spinal instrumentation with a pedicle screw (PS) system. However, significant clinical problems, including loosening and back-out of PSs, persist. During the last decade, a novel technology that produces bioactive Ti from chemical and heat treatments has been reported that induces the spontaneous formation of a hydroxyapatite (HA) layer on the surface of Ti materials. The purpose of this study was to study the effect of bioactivation of Ti-6Al-4V PSs on the ability of HA formation in vitro and its biocompatibility and bone-bonding ability in vivo.

Methods

Ti-6V-4Al alloy PSs were prepared and bioactivated by NaOH-CaCl₂-heat-water treatments. The HA-forming ability of bioactive PSs in simulated body fluid (SBF) was evaluated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). Six 11-month-old female beagle dogs were used for the in vivo study. Bioactive and control (without bioactivation) PSs were left and right randomly placed from L1 to L6. One and three months after surgery, lumbar spines were removed for biomechanical and histological analyses.

Results

In vitro: The surface analysis of bioactive PSs by FE-SEM and EDX showed substantial HA deposits over the entire surface. In vivo: The mean extraction torque was significantly higher for bioactive PSs compared to controls PSs (P<0.01); there was no significant difference in pull-out strength between control and bioactive PSs. Histologically, the contact area between bone tissue and screw surface showed no significant trend to be greater in bioactive PSs compared to control PSs (P = 0.06).

Conclusions

Bioactive PSs prepared by chemical and heat treatments formed layers of HA on the surface of screws in vitro that improved biocompatibility and bonding ability with bone in vivo. Bioactive PSs may reduce screw loosening to overcome the obstacles confronted in spinal instrumentation surgery.

Spondylodiscitis revisited

Spondylodiscitis may involve the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, paravertebral structures and spinal canal, with potentially high morbidity and mortality rates.

A rise in the susceptible population and improved diagnosis have increased the reported incidence of the disease in recent years.

Blood cultures, appropriate imaging and biopsy are essential for diagnosis and treatment.

Most patients are successfully treated by conservative means; however, some patients may require surgical treatment.

Surgical indications include doubtful diagnosis, progressive neurological deficits, progressive spinal deformity, failure to respond to treatment, and unresolved pain.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:447–461. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160062

Spontaneous Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis in the Thoracic or Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery Over a Nine-Year Period

PURPOSE

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a rare disease, but its incidence is increasing. Over the last decade, spinal surgery has been modified to become minimally invasive. In degenerative spinal disorders, such minimally invasive surgery (MIS) reduces blood loss, muscular trauma, and the hospital stay. However, it is not known whether MIS also confers these benefits to patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. This retrospective cohort study compared the safety and efficacy of MIS and the conventional open surgical procedure in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for thoracic or lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis that was not caused by previous surgery or tuberculosis in our tertiary-care institution between January 2003 and December 2011.

RESULTS

Of the 148 eligible patients, 75 and 73 underwent MIS and open surgery, respectively. The 2 groups did not differ in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, comorbidities, septic disease, or preoperative neurologic deficit. The 2 methods were associated with similar postoperative stays in the intensive care unit, overall hospital stays, complication rates, and postoperative survival. However, MIS was associated with a significantly shorter operating time, a lower perioperative need for blood products, and, as expected, an increased intraoperative fluoroscopy duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 9-year experience suggests that MIS is safe and effective for spontaneous pyogenic thoracic and lumbar spondylodiscitis.

A Novel Groove-Entry Technique for Inserting Thoracic Percutaneous Pedicle Screws

STUDY DESIGN

Surgical technique.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a novel groove-entry technique for thoracic percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation has many advantages over open procedures. Because of the variability among PPS entry points, the sloped cortex of the transverse process, and the narrow thoracic pedicle, thoracic PPS placement is technically challenging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 24 patients who underwent minimally invasive spine stabilization procedures involving 165 thoracic PPS placements using the novel technique was performed. The thoracic PPS entry is a groove formed by 3 bony elements: the cranial portion of the base of the transverse process, the rib neck, and the posterolateral wall of the pedicle. This groove can be easily identified under fluoroscopy with a Jamshidi needle allowing thoracic PPS insertion in the craniocaudal direction.

RESULTS

Of the 165 thoracic PPSs placed, "Good" or "Acceptable" PPS placement accuracy was achieved in 152 (92.1%) and 164 (99.4%) placements, respectively. No complications such as organ injury, and screw loosening or breakage were observed with thoracic PPS insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel technique is both safe and reliable, with low misplacement and complication rates. In hospitals in which computer image guidance or navigation is unavailable, this groove-entry technique may become the standard for thoracic PPS insertion.

Pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: safety and outcomes

PURPOSE

Our aim was to study the safety and outcomes of posterior instrumentation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treating pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data of 27 consecutive cases of lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis treated with posterior instrumentation and TLIF between January 2009 and December 2012. Cases were analysed for safety, radiological and clinical outcomes of transforaminal interbody fusion using bone graft ± titanium cages. Interbody metallic cages with bone graft were used in 17 cases and ten cases used only bone graft. Indications for surgical treatment were failed conservative management in 17, neurodeficit in six and significant bony destruction in four.

RESULTS

There were no cases reporting cage migration, loosening, pseudoarthrosis or recurrence of infection at a mean follow-up of 30 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Kirkaldy-Willis criteria, which showed 14 excellent, nine good, three fair and one poor result. Mean focal deformity improved with the use of bone graft ± interbody cages, and the deformity correction was maintained at final follow-up. Mean pre-operative focal lordosis for the graft group was 8.5° (2-16.5°), which improved to 10.9 °(3.3-16°); mean pre-operative focal lordosis in the group treated with cages was 6.7 °(0-15°), which improved to 7°(0-15°) .

CONCLUSION

TLIFs with cages in patients with pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis allows for acceptable clearance of infection, satisfactory deformity correction with low incidence of cage migration, loosening and infection recurrence.

Outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Spondylodiscitis is a spinal infection affecting primarily the intervertebral disk and the adjacent vertebral bodies. Currently many aspects of the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis are still a matter of debate.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the currently available literature systematically to determine the outcome of patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis for conservative and surgical treatment strategies.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science regarding the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis was performed. Included articles were assessed on risk of bias according the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation was evaluated according the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

25 studies were included. Five studies had a high or moderate quality of evidence. One RCT suggest that 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis results in a similar outcome when compared to longer treatment duration. However, microorganism-specific studies suggest that at least 8 weeks of treatment is required for S. aureus and 8 weeks of Daptomycin for MRSA. The articles that described the outcome of surgical treatment strategies show that a large variety of surgical techniques can successfully treat spondylodiscitis. No additional long-term beneficial effect of surgical treatment could be shown in the studies comparing surgical versus antibiotic only treatment.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong level of recommendation for 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment in pyogenic spondylodiscitis although this has only been shown by one recent RCT. If surgical treatment is indicated, it has been suggested by two prospective studies with strong level of recommendation that an isolated anterior approach could result in a better clinical outcome.