A decision rule to aid selection of patients with abdominal sepsis requiring a relaparotomy

Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Technique in Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Study

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. In clinical practice, there are two different routes to repair inguinal hernias: laparoscopic mesh repair and open. Reducing the hernia and preventing recurrence remains the mainstay treatment option of both procedures. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes and recurrence rates for patients who had primary, non-recurrent, laparoscopic, or open hernia repair in a single tertiary hospital. A retrospective cohort study was done on 468 patients. The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) between 2013 and 2022. The distribution of our study population was divided into open hernia repair 378 participants (80.8%) while the rest did laparoscopic hernia repair 90 (19.2%). Operation duration in minutes was 107.158 ± 41.402 in the open hernia repair group and was noted to be significantly higher in the laparoscopic hernia repair group, with 142.811 ± 52.102 minutes p-value (0.000). The hospital length of stay was shown to be shorter in laparoscopic hernia repair (1.58 ±1.27) compared to open hernia repair (2.05±5.33). The most common postoperative complication was scrotal swelling, commonly associated with laparoscopic (5.55%) compared to 2.11% in open hernia repair. Open repair showed a risk of scrotal hematoma with a percentage of 0.52% compared to 0% in the laparoscopic method with a p-value (0.033). Hernia recurrence was non-related with any specific group, although noted to be higher in the laparoscopic group (7.77%), while in the open group (3.4%) with a p-value (0.081). The study conducted showed no alarming percentages for recurrence in either technique, open or laparoscopic, yet the open approach had a better outcome when it comes to scrotal pain and swelling post-operatively, chronic groin pain, and readmission rate as compared to laparoscopic technique, despite having a longer hospital stay. Future larger studies should be conducted to provide equal population inclusivity.

Sepsis and postoperative surgical site infections

Surgical site infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. High-quality evidence supports several measures to prevent surgical site infections that should be applied with high compliance, although effective application remains suboptimal. Recognizing high-risk patients and avoiding potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of surgical site infections is paramount in preventing progression to sepsis, particularly in emergency surgical patients with physiologic derangement. A high index of suspicion postoperatively is critical to identify patients with surgical site infections and to prevent failure to rescue.

Functional Characterization of Neutrophils Allows Source Control Evaluation in a Murine Sepsis Model

INTRODUCTION

Current surgical guidelines for the treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis recommend interventional source control as the key element of therapy, alongside resuscitation and antibiotic administration. Past trials attempted to predict the success of interventional source control to assess whether further interventional therapy is needed. However, no predictive score could be developed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We utilized an established murine abdominal sepsis model, the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), and performed a successful surgical source control intervention after full development of sepsis, the CLP-excision (CLP/E). We then sought to evaluate the success of the source control by characterizing circulating neutrophil phenotype and functionality 24 h postintervention.

RESULTS

We showed a significant relative increase of neutrophils and a significant absolute and relative increase of activated neutrophils in septic mice. Source control with CLP/E restored these numbers back to baseline. Moreover, main neutrophil functions, the acidification of cell compartments, such as lysosomes, and the production of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), were impaired in septic mice but restored after CLP/E intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutrophil characterization by phenotyping and evaluating their functionality indicates successful source control in septic mice and can serve as a prognostic tool. These findings provide a rationale for the phenotypic and functional characterization of neutrophils in human patients with infection. Further studies will be needed to determine whether a predictive score for the assessment of successful surgical source control can be established.

Diagnostic challenges in postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis in critically ill patients: When to reoperate?

The present paper was done to review common diagnostic techniques used to help surgeons find the most suitable way to diagnose postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS). The topic was searched on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Collected articles were classified and checked for their quality. Findings of selected research were included in this study and analyzed to find the best diagnostic method for intra-abdominal sepsis. IAS presents severe morbidity and mortality, and its early diagnosis can improve the outcome. Currently, there is no consensus among surgeons on a single diagnostic modality that should be used while deciding reoperation in patients with postoperative IAS. Though it has a high sensitivity for abdominal infections, computed tomography has limited applications due to mobility and time constraints. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe process that produces usable images, and can be used at the bedside. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) has high sensitivity, and the patients testing positive through DPL can be subjected to exploratory laparotomy, depending on severity. Abdominal Reoperation Predictive Index (ARPI) is the only index reported as an aid for this purpose. Serial intra-abdominal pressure measurement has also emerged as a potential diagnostic tool. A proper selection of diagnostic modality is expected to improve the outcome in IAS, which presents high mortality risk and a limited time frame.

TNM: a simple classification system for complicated intra-abdominal sepsis after acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Delayed diagnosis in case of acute appendicitis (AA) could lead to complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS). Grading systems are not commonly employed in the clinical practice, because they are too complicated or too specific. Therefore, we suggest grading the severity of complicated IAS after AA with a simple system: TNM, an acronym borrowed by cancer staging where T indicates temperature, N neutrophils, and M multiple organ failure (MOF). This prospective observational study evaluates the predictive value of the TNM score on mortality of patients with complicated IAS after AA.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with complicated IAS after AA were treated. Three classes of attributes were chosen: temperature (T), neutrophils count (N), and MOF (M). After defining the categories T (T0-T4), N (N0-N3) and M (M0-M2), these were grouped in stages (0-IV). Variables analyzed for their possible relation to death were age, sex, temperature, neutrophils count, preoperative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stage (0-IV). Odds ratios were calculated in a univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

TNM staging was: one patient stage 0; 16 patients at stage I; 26 patients at stage II; 16 patients at stage III; nine patients at stage IV. Death occurred in 15 patients (22%). Neutrophil count, preoperative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stages III-IV were potential predictors of postoperative death in univariate analysis; only stage IV was significant independent predictor of postoperative mortality in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

TNM classification is very easy to use; it helps to define the mortality risk and is useful to objectively compare patients with sepsis.

The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after emergent laparotomy

BACKGROUND

To standardize care and promote early fascial closure among patients undergoing emergent laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure (TAC), we developed a protocol addressing patient selection, operative technique, resuscitation strategies, and critical care provisions. We hypothesized that primary fascial closure rates would increase following protocol implementation with no difference in complication rates.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 138 adult trauma and emergency general surgery patients who underwent emergent laparotomy and TAC, comparing protocol patients (n = 60) to recent historic controls (n = 78) who would have met protocol inclusion criteria. The protocol includes low-volume 3% hypertonic saline resuscitation, judicious wound vacuum fluid replacement, and early relaparotomy with sequential fascial closure. Demographics, baseline characteristics, illness severity, resuscitation course, operative management, and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was fascial closure.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and postoperative lactate levels, were similar between groups. Within 48 hours of initial laparotomy and TAC, protocol patients received significantly lower total intravenous fluid resuscitation volumes (9.7 vs. 11.4 L, p = 0.044) and exhibited higher serum osmolarity (303 vs. 293 mOsm/kg, p = 0.001). The interval between abdominal operations was significantly shorter following protocol implementation (28.2 vs. 32.2 hours, p = 0.027). The incidence of primary fascial closure was significantly higher in the protocol group (93% vs. 81%, p = 0.045, number needed to treat = 8.3). Complication rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol implementation was associated with lower crystalloid resuscitation volumes, a transient hyperosmolar state, shorter intervals between operations, and higher fascial closure rates with no difference in complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The open abdomen (OA) procedure as part of damage control surgery represents a significant surgical advance in severe intra-abdominal infections. Major techniques used for OA are negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and non-NPWT. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effects of different abdominal closure methods and their outcomes in patients presenting with abdominal sepsis treated with OA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of patients affected by severe intra-abdominal sepsis treated with OA. Demographic features, mortality prediction score, abdominal closure methods, length of hospital stay, complications and mortality rates of patients were determined and compared.

RESULTS

This study included 106 patients, of whom 77 underwent OA with NPWT and 29 with non-NPWT. OA duration was longer in NPWT patients (p = 0.007). In-hospital mortality rates in NPWT and in non-NPWT patients were 40.3% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.126), with an overall 30-day mortality rate of 18.2% and 51.7%, respectively (p = 0.0002). After emergency colorectal surgery, patients who underwent OA with NPWT had a lower rate of colostomy (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

NPWT is the best temporary abdominal closure technique to decrease mortality and colostomy rates in patients managed with OA for severe intra-abdominal infections.

Temperature-Neutrophils-Multiple Organ Failure Grading for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

Background: The grading systems for intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) are not employed commonly in clinical practice because they are too complicated or too specific. We propose to grade IAS with a simple grading system: the TNM system, which is an acronym borrowed from cancer staging, where T indicates Temperature, N indicates Neutrophils, and M indicates Multiple organ failure (MOF). The aim of this prospective observational study is to assess the predictive value of the TNM score on deaths of patients with complicated IAS. Patients and Methods: We considered 147 patients with complicated IAS. Three classes of attribute were chosen: Temperature (T), Neutrophil count (N), and MOF (M). After defining the categories T (T0-T4), N (N0-N3), and M (M0-M2), they were grouped in stages (0-IV). We analyzed specific variables for their possible relation to death: Age, gender, blood transfusion, causes of IAS, T, N, pre-operative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stage 0, I, II, III, and IV. Odds ratios were calculated in a uni-variable and multi-variable analysis. Results: This was the distribution in classes, based on TNM stages: One patient was in stage 0; 15 patients in stage I; 47 patients in stage II; 56 patients in stage III; 28 patients in stage IV. Death occurred in 45 (30.6%) patients. The N, pre-operative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stage III-IV were potential predictors of post-operative death in uni-variable analysis. Only pre-operative organ failure and stage IV were significant independent predictors of post-operative death in multi-variable analysis. Conclusions: The TNM classification is an easy system that could be considered to define the death risk of patients with IAS and to compare patients with sepsis.

Novel method for delayed primary closure and incisional hernia prevention in open abdomen: COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal wall closure (COMODA)

BACKGROUND

Intended open abdomen is an option in cases of trauma and non-trauma patients. Nevertheless, after primary closure, incisional hernia rate is high. We describe a novel method, called COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal closure (COMODA), a delayed primary closure which prevents incisional hernia.

METHODS

A negative pressure wound therapy system is combined with a condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (cPTFE) mesh.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN72678033.

RESULTS

Ten male patients with a median age of 68.8 (43-87) years were included. Primary closure rate was 100% per protocol. The median number of procedures per patient was 5.7 (5-9). Primary closure was obtained in 20.8 (10-32) days and median hospital stay was 36.3 (18-52) days. Only one patient developed incisional hernia during a median follow-up of 27 (8-60) months.

CONCLUSION

COMODA method allows for a high rate of delayed primary closure. It is safe and decreases the risk for developing an incisional hernia. However, a large number of patients are needed to support this conclusion.

Abdominal sepsis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the recent evidence on the treatment of abdominal sepsis with a specific emphasis on the surgical treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

A multitude of surgical approaches towards abdominal sepsis are practised. Recent evidence shows that immediate closure of the abdomen has a better outcome. A short course of antibiotics has a similar effect as a long course of antibiotics in patients with intra-abdominal infection without severe sepsis.

SUMMARY

Management of abdominal sepsis requires a multidisciplinary approach. Closing the abdomen permanently after source control and only reopening it in case of deterioration of the patient without other (percutaneous) options is the preferred strategy. There is no convincing evidence that damage control surgery is beneficial in patients with abdominal sepsis. If primary closure of the abdomen is impossible because of excessive visceral edema, delayed closure using negative pressure therapy with continuous mesh-mediated fascial traction shows the best results.

Impact of repeated abdominal surgery on wound healing and myeloid cell dynamics

BACKGROUND

Even though wound dehiscence is a surgical complication, under certain medical conditions, repetition of the laparotomy (LT) (relaparotomy) can become inevitable. In addition to the risks associated with this surgical operation, relaparotomy can interfere with the tissue healing and contribute to the development of chronic wounds.

METHODS

In an experimental relaparotomy wounding model, this study investigated the impact of repeated surgery on wound healing and on the immune cells of myeloid origin.

RESULTS

The first repeat of the LT triggered fibrosis and marginally interfered with the wound healing; however, the second operation completely abrogated the healing process. Splenomegaly was observed as an indicator of the chronic inflammation and the systemic effect of repeated laparotomies. In the blood stream, the spleen, and the liver, these repeated surgeries exhibited a major impact on the CD11b⁺Ly6C⁺Ly6G^- monocytes. On the other hand, especially, whespecially the second relaparotomy resulted in a massive purging of neutrophil granulocytes into the circulation. These CD11b⁺Ly6C⁺Ly6G⁺ neutrophils that were disseminated on repeated abdominal laparotomies had a proinflammatory character that positively influenced T cell proliferation and displayed a high capacity for production of reactive oxygen species.

CONCLUSIONS

The repetition of abdominal LT not only interferes with the wound healing but also contributes to the development of imperfectly healing wounds which have systemic impact on immune compartments.

The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence-based guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) were published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) in 1992, 2002, and 2010. At the time the most recent guideline was released, the plan was to update the guideline every five years to ensure the timeliness and appropriateness of the recommendations.

METHODS

Based on the previous guidelines, the task force outlined a number of topics related to the treatment of patients with IAI and then developed key questions on these various topics. All questions were approached using general and specific literature searches, focusing on articles and other information published since 2008. These publications and additional materials published before 2008 were reviewed by the task force as a whole or by individual subgroups as to relevance to individual questions. Recommendations were developed by a process of iterative consensus, with all task force members voting to accept or reject each recommendation. Grading was based on the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system; the quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, or weak, and the strength of the recommendation was graded as strong or weak. Review of the document was performed by members of the SIS who were not on the task force. After responses were made to all critiques, the document was approved as an official guideline of the SIS by the Executive Council.

RESULTS

This guideline summarizes the current recommendations developed by the task force on the treatment of patients who have IAI. Evidence-based recommendations have been made regarding risk assessment in individual patients; source control; the timing, selection, and duration of antimicrobial therapy; and suggested approaches to patients who fail initial therapy. Additional recommendations related to the treatment of pediatric patients with IAI have been included.

SUMMARY

The current recommendations of the SIS regarding the treatment of patients with IAI are provided in this guideline.

Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis : A continuing problem

Secondary peritonitis remains associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Treatment of secondary peritonitis is challenging even in modern medicine. Surgical intervention for source control remains the cornerstone of treatment, beside adequate antimicrobial therapy and resuscitation. A randomized clinical trial showed that relaparotomy on demand (ROD) after initial emergency surgery is the preferred treatment strategy, irrespective of the severity and extent of peritonitis. The effective and safe use of ROD requires intensive monitoring of the patient in a setting where diagnostic tests and decision making about relaparotomy are guaranteed round the clock. The lack of knowledge on timely and adequate patient selection, together with the lack of use of easy but reliable monitoring tools, seems to hamper full implementation of ROD. The accuracy of the relap decision tool is reasonable for prediction of ongoing peritonitis and selection for computer tomography (CT). The value of CT in an early postoperative phase is unclear. Future research and innovative technologies should focus on the additive value of CT in cases of operated secondary peritonitis and on the further optimization of bedside prediction tools to enhance adequate patient selection for intervention in a multidisciplinary setting.

External Validation of a Decision Tool To Guide Post-Operative Management of Patients with Secondary Peritonitis

BACKGROUND

Timely identification of patients in need of an intervention for abdominal sepsis after initial surgical management of secondary peritonitis is vital but complex. The aim of this study was to validate a decision tool for this purpose and to evaluate its potential to guide post-operative management.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for secondary peritonitis in a single hospital. Assessments using the decision tool, based on one intra-operative and five post-operative variables, were performed on the second and third post-operative days and when the patients' clinical status deteriorated. Scores were compared with the clinical reference standard of persistent sepsis based on the clinical course or findings at imaging or surgery. Additionally, the potential of the decision tool to guide management in terms of diagnostic imaging in three previously defined score categories (low, intermediate, and high) was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 161 assessments were performed in 69 patients. The majority of cases of secondary peritonitis (68%) were caused by perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. Post-operative persistent sepsis occurred in 28 patients. The discriminative capacity of the decision tool score was fair (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic = 0.79). The incidence rate differed significantly between the three score categories (p < 0.001). The negative predictive value of a decision tool score categorized as low probability was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82-94) and 65% (95% CI 47-79) for an intermediate score. Diagnostic imaging was performed more frequently when there was an intermediate score than when the score was categorized as low (46% vs. 24%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients operated on for secondary peritonitis, the decision tool score predicts with fair accuracy whether persistent sepsis is present.

Evaluation of peripheral blood and abdominal fluid variables as predictors of intestinal surgical site failure in dogs with septic peritonitis following celiotomy and the placement of closed-suction abdominal drains

OBJECTIVE To evaluate peripheral blood and abdominal fluid variables as predictors of intestinal surgical site failure in dogs with septic peritonitis following celiotomy and closed-suction abdominal drain (CSAD) placement. DESIGN Prospective study. ANIMALS 26 dogs with septic peritonitis that underwent celiotomy and CSAD placement. PROCEDURES Abdominal fluid and blood samples were collected prior to surgery and daily thereafter until CSAD removal. Abdominal fluid was collected through the CSAD. Analysis of all samples included pH, PCO2, PO2, PCV, WBC count, and total solids, glucose, lactate, and electrolyte concentrations. Abdominal fluid samples also underwent cytologic evaluation and bacterial culture, and the volume of fluid removed through the drain was recorded daily. The blood-to-fluid glucose and lactate differences, fluid-to-blood lactate ratio and blood-to-fluid WBC and neutrophil ratios were determined daily. Dogs were categorized into 2 groups on the basis of whether they had an uneventful recovery (UR) or developed postoperative septic peritonitis (POSP). RESULTS 23 dogs had a UR and 3 developed POSP. On the third day after surgery, the abdominal fluid WBC count was significantly lower and the blood-to-fluid WBC and neutrophil ratios were significantly higher for dogs in the POSP group, compared with those for dogs in the UR group. None of the other blood and abdominal fluid variables assessed differed significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results failed to identify any objective predictive indicators for POSP in dogs with CSADs. Use of blood-to-fluid WBC and neutrophil ratios as predictive indicators for POSP requires further investigation.

[Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis: A continuing problem. German version]

BACKGROUND

Secondary peritonitis remains associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Treatment of secondary peritonitis is still challenging even in the era of modern medicine. Surgical intervention for source control remains the cornerstone of treatment besides adequate antimicrobial therapy and when necessary intensive medical care measures and resuscitation. A randomized clinical trial showed that relaparotomy on demand (ROD) after initial emergency surgery was the preferred treatment strategy, irrespective of the severity and extent of peritonitis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The effective and safe use of ROD requires intensive monitoring of the patient in a setting where diagnostic tests and decision making about relaparotomy are guaranteed round the clock. The lack of knowledge on timely and adequate patient selection, together with the lack of use of easy but reliable monitoring tools seem to hamper full implementation of ROD. The accuracy of the relaparotomy decision tool is reasonable for prediction of the formation of peritonitis and necessary selection of patients for computed tomography (CT). The value of CT in the early postoperative phase is unclear. Future research and innovative technologies should focus on the additive value of CT after surgical treatment for secondary peritonitis and on the further optimization of bedside prediction tools to enhance adequate patient selection for interventions in a multidisciplinary setting.

Recombinant soluble thrombomodulin for postoperative disseminated intravascular coagulation

BACKGROUND

Thrombomodulin is a thrombin receptor on the endothelial cell surface that plays an important role in the regulation of intravascular coagulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) for patients with septic-disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) associated with gastroenterological surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2011-September 2013, 201 patients with DIC associated with gastroenterological surgery were treated in 16 institutions in Kumamoto, Japan. The patients were diagnosed according to the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC scoring system. The clinical course, mortality rate at 28 d, and adverse events were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were excluded because they did not meet the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria or had an insufficient duration of drug administration. Thus, 156 patients were analyzed. Of these patients, 107 received rhTM at the discretion of the attending surgeon and 49 did not. The most common reason for surgery in both groups was peritonitis due to perforation of the colon. Within 7 d, the platelet count, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, DIC score, neutrophil count, and C-reactive protein level significantly improved in the rhTM group compared with those in the control. Treatment with rhTM was significantly associated with reduced inhospital mortality at 28 d. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with rhTM may be associated with reduced inhospital mortality in patients with septic DIC associated with gastroenterological surgery without increasing adverse events.

The role of the open abdomen procedure in managing severe abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper

The open abdomen (OA) procedure is a significant surgical advance, as part of damage control techniques in severe abdominal trauma. Its application can be adapted to the advantage of patients with severe abdominal sepsis, however its precise role in these patients is still not clear. In severe abdominal sepsis the OA may allow early identification and draining of any residual infection, control any persistent source of infection, and remove more effectively infected or cytokine-loaded peritoneal fluid, preventing abdominal compartment syndrome and deferring definitive intervention and anastomosis until the patient is appropriately resuscitated and hemodynamically stable and thus better able to heal. However, the OA may require multiple returns to the operating room and may be associated with significant complications, including enteroatmospheric fistulas, loss of abdominal wall domain and large hernias. Surgeons should be aware of the pathophysiology of severe intra-abdominal sepsis and always keep in mind the option of using open abdomen to be able to use it in the right patient at the right time.