Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study

[Which management for anterior urethral stricture in male? 2021 guidelines from the uro-genital reconstruction urologist group (GURU) under the aegis of CAMS-AFU (Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the French Association of Urology)]

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this first french guideline is to provide a clinical framework for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of anterior urethral strictures. The statements are established by the subgroup working on uro-genital reconstruction surgery (GURU) from the CAMS-AFU (Andrology and Sexual Medicine Committee from the French Association of Urology).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

These guidelines are adapted from the Male Urethral Stricture : American Urological Association Guideline 2016, updated by an additional bibliography from January 2016 to December 2019. Twenty-seven main scenarios seen in clinical practice are identified: from diagnosis, to treatment and follow-up. In addition, this guidelines are powered by anatomical diagrams, treatment algorithms, summaries and follow-up tables.

RESULTS

Anterior urethral strictures are a common condition (0,1 à 1,4 %) in men. The diagnosis is based on a trifecta including an examination with patient reported questionnaires, urethroscopy and retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography. Short meatal stenosis can be treated by dilation or meatotomy, otherwise a urethroplasty can be performed. First line treatment of penile strictures is urethroplasty. Short bulbar strictures (<2cm) may benefit from endourethral treatment (direct visual internal urethrotomy or dilation). In case of recurrence or when the stenosis measures more than 2 cm, a urethroplasty will be proposed. Repeated endourethral treatment management are no longer recommended except in case of palliative option. Urethroplasty is usually done with oral mucosa graft as the primary option, in one or two stages approach depending on the extent of the stenosis and the quality of the tissues. Excision and primary anastomosis or non-transecting techniques are discussed for bulbar urethra strictures. Follow-up by clinical monitoring with urethroscopy, or retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography, is performed at least the first year and then on demand according to symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Anterior urethral strictures need an open surgical approach and should be treated by urethroplasty in most cases. This statement requires a major paradigm shift in practices. Training urologist through reconstructive surgery is the next challenge in order to meet the demand.

Full-thickness labial flaps to reconstruct facial defects in four dogs

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of the upper lip for reconstruction of the external nose and closure of large facial defects in dogs.

ANIMALS

Four dogs with facial defects with exposure of the underlying nasal cavity.

STUDY DESIGN

Short case series.

METHODS

A variation of the lip-to-lid technique was used to reconstruct one-half of the external nose after resection of a mast cell tumor in one dog. A full-thickness labial transposition flap (upper lip) was used to reconstruct facial and nasal defects exposing the nasal cavity. A cylindrical mucosal graft was employed in the restoration of nostril patency in one dog.

RESULTS

The lip-to-lid variation (also known as lip-to-nose) restored the right nostril and nasal planum after mast cell tumor resection in one dog. In three dogs, the nasal defects were reconstructed with full-thickness upper labial transposition flaps. Restoration of nostril patency in one dog was also aided by the cylindrical mucosal graft.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The full-thickness labial transposition flap and the lip-to-lid flap variation were successfully used to reconstruct major defects of the external nose and facial defects involving the nasal cavity.

CONCLUSION

Composite flaps of the upper lip should be considered to close problematic nasocutaneous fistulas and restore function to the external nose. The upper lip provides a source of mucosa to restore patency of stenotic nares or obstructed nostrils.

Buccal Mucosa Tube Graft for Failed Hypospadias Repair: Worth it or Not?

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcome of buccal mucosa tube graft (BMTG) over time in correcting failed hypospadias.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis, reviewing charts of all 69 patients who underwent BMTG to repair hypospadias between January 2005 and October 2016. Twenty-one patients were excluded, leaving 48 eligible study subjects. In patients with penile curvatures, corrective procedures (including urethral division, corporoplasty, and local skin flap) took place prior to grafting.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 8.96 years, and mean duration of follow-up was 73.10 ± 30.31 months. A mean of 1.88 previous surgeries was recorded. During follow-up, only 7 patients (14.5%) were complication free. The other 41 patients required at least 1 additional procedure. Stricture-free rates were 50%, 35.4%, and 27% at 1, 3, and 12 months after BMTG, respectively. Among 37 patients with postoperative stricture, 25 were treated only by endoscopic procedures. Single operation prior to BMTG (P= .004) and usage of larger catheter size (>8Fr) (P = .029) were confirmed significant factors associated with better stricture-free survival after BMTG by log-rank test. After several additional procedures, 46 patients (95.8%) reported normal urination with mean maximal urinary flow of 9.55 mL/s and post-void residual of 16.08 mL for at least 12 months on last visit.

CONCLUSION

BMTG after failed hypospadias repair seems prone to complications, primarily urethral stricture. However, a large number of patients with postoperative stricture could be treated simply by endoscopic procedures. Given the better results of staged approach, BMTG should be only applied to highly selected patients with failed hypospadias.

Challenges in managing proximal hypospadias: A 17-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND

There are only a few publications in the medical literature reporting on complication rates in proximal hypospadias surgery, particularly with regard to long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Over a 17.5-year period, we operated 100 patients with penoscrotal, scrotal and perineal hypospadias. Sixty-four had a single-stage repair, including 15 who received a buccal mucosa inlay "Snodgraft" repair. Thirty-six had a two-stage Bracka repair of which 19 received buccal or lower lip grafts and 17 had preputial grafts. Overall, 34 patients received buccal grafts. The median follow-up was eight years (range 1-16 years). Three patients were operated for residual chordee years later.

RESULTS

Urethral fistulae occurred in a total of 26/100 (26.0%) cases, meatal stenosis in 16/100 (16.0%), wound breakdown in six (6.0%) and graft failure in one (1.0%). The fistula rate after the single-stage approach was 15/64 (23.4%), whereas it was 11/36 (30.6%) following two-stage repair (P = 0.4811).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal hypospadias remains a challenging condition to treat. It is possible to perform a single-stage repair in 64.0% of cases. This brings down the median number of operations to only two. Lower lip grafts were used in 34.0% but are now used in redo-surgeries only. Our fistula rate was 26.0% but has decreased significantly in recent years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Lingual mucosal graft two-stage Bracka technique for redo hypospadias repair

Objectives

To report our initial experience in redo hypospadias repair with a lingual mucosal graft (LMG) using a two-stage Bracka technique.

Patients and methods

This study was prospectively conducted and included 26 patients with hypospadias with failed previous repairs. All the patients had a LMG using a two-stage Bracka technique. In the first stage, the harvested LMG, from the ventro-lateral surface of the tongue, was implanted in a well-prepared vascularised bed in the ventral aspect of the penis. After 6 months, tubularisation of the well-taken graft was completed. Tunica vaginalis or a dartos flap was used as second-layer coverage of the neourethra. Success was defined as acceptable aesthetic and functional outcomes without any additional surgical interventions.

Results

The mean (SD) patient age was 5.15 (1.6) years. The mean (SD) LMG length was 3.82 (0.9) cm and the width was 1.5 (0.5) cm. The mean (SD) number of previous repairs was 2.76 (1.1). The mean (SD) follow-up was 12 (2) months. Donor-site complications included: pain in all patients, with a pain score of >3 on the visual analogue pain scale (0–10) in 10 (38%); and speech problems in 19 (73%). First-stage complications were graft loss (n = 2) and contracture (n = 1). The second stage was completed in 23 patients resulting in the following significant complications: meatal stenosis plus fistula (n = 2), breakdown (n = 1). Successful hypospadias repair was achieved in 77% (20/26) of the patients.

Conclusion

Lingual mucosa is a reliable and versatile graft material in the armamentarium of two-stage Bracka hypospadias repair with the merits of easy harvesting and minor donor-site complications.