Early results of a novel technique for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: anterior vaginal wall darn

The Comparison of Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Surgery with and without Midline Fascial Plication for the Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery with and without midline fascial plication for anterior prolapse repair. This is a prospective randomized trial in a teaching hospital. This study compared patients with anterior vaginal wall prolapse (POP-Q Ba > −1) who were randomly assigned to either transvaginal mesh (TVM, Avaulta Solo^TM, CR Bard. Inc., Covington, GA, USA polypropylene mesh delivery system) (group A, n = 32) or TVM with concomitant midline fascial plication (group B, n = 32). The outcomes of anatomy correction and life quality were evaluated using a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and questionnaires. Sixty-four patients were included from January 2011 through April 2014 in this study. Group A had a mean age of 63.7 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 25.4 kg/m². Group B had a mean age of 62.9 years and a BMI of 25.4. The mean follow-up duration was 18.6 months (range 12–50). At the 12-month follow-up, anatomic recurrence was higher in Group A (5/31, 16.1%) than in Group B (1/30, 3.3%) but without statistical significance (p = 0.19). Improvements in symptoms and quality of life were not significantly different between the two groups. Mesh extrusion was detected in three of 61 patients (4.9%): two from group A (6.7%) and one from Group B (3.2%). TVM with concomitant midline fascia repair for anterior vaginal prolapse had a comparable anterior support and mesh exposure rate compared with TVM alone. Trial Registration: IRB-B09904021

Effects of Surgical Anatomical Correction of Pelvic Anterior Compartment Defect on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of surgical anatomical correction on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with a pelvic anterior compartment defect (PACD).

METHODS

This prospective study was carried out on 30 women who had stage II-IV PACD. The women were questioned regarding LUTS symptoms such as urgency, urge incontinence, frequency, hesitancy, abnormal emptying, nocturia and dysuria pre and postoperatively. After a 7-month follow up, the comparison of LUTS symptoms with respect to their healing, existence or de novo appearance was performed using the McNemar and Bowner and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

For the repair of ACD, 15, 8 and 7 women were operated on using site-specific surgery, transvaginal mesh placement and anterior colporrhaphy, respectively. Surgery has significantly improved the LUTS: urgency (100 vs 26.7%, urge incontinence (70 vs 16.7%), frequency (76.7 vs 13.3%), abnormal emptying (56.7 vs 10%), hesitancy (30 vs 6.7%), nocturia (83.3 vs 60%) and dysuria (30 vs 6.7%). The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The correctional surgery on anterior compartment defects not only maintains the anatomy but also significantly heals the LUTS.