Is annual surveillance of all treated hypothyroid patients necessary?

Thyroid function status in patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement and associated factors: a retrospective cohort study in primary care

BACKGROUND

Long-term management of patients with hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement requires thyroid function test (TFT) monitoring once every six-12 months as recommended by clinical practice guidelines. This study determined their thyroid function status during two-year follow-up visits in primary care, and the factors influencing their thyroid status, and assessed the optimal interval for TFTs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults with a clinical diagnosis code for hypothyroidism in their electronic health records taken from a group of polyclinics in Singapore between July 2017 and June 2020. The follow-up thyroid status was categorized as under-replacement (TSH ≥ 3.70mIU/L), over-replacement (TSH ≤ 0.65mIU/L) or euthyroid (TSH 0.65-3.70mIU/L). The patients' demographic, clinical and TFT data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests during the two-year follow-up. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the factors associated with suboptimal thyroid control. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare their thyroid function status in association with the interval between TFT monitoring.

RESULTS

Data from 5,749 eligible subjects (mean age 62.1 ± 13.29 years; 79% female; 79.7% Chinese) were analyzed. After a two-year follow-up, 61.9% (n = 3558) of all subjects were euthyroid, with 29.5% (n = 1694) being under-replaced and 8.6% (n = 497) over-replaced. However, thyroid status did not differ significantly with the various dose regimen (daily, segmented, or alternate days) (p = 0.193). Stepwise logistic regression showed that thyroxine under-replacement was significantly associated with the male gender (AOR = 1.25,95%CI = 1.03-1.51,p = 0.02) and obesity (AOR = 1.34,95%CI = 1.08-1.66,p = 0.008). Every unit (μg/kg body weight) increase in the mean daily thyroxine dose was associated with 2.72 times greater odds of over-replacement. When comparing thyroid function monitoring at intervals of 13-24 months, monitoring at shorter intervals (≤ 12 months) was less likely to detect thyroxine under-replacement (AOR = 0.57,95%CI = 0.44-0.74,p < 0.001) and over-replacement (AOR = 0.62,95%CI = 0.41-0.97,p = 0.033). Among the 3,312 adults who were euthyroid at baseline, 22.2%, 41.7% and 59.6% had suboptimal thyroid control at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively (Kaplan-Meier analysis).

CONCLUSION

Around six in ten patients were euthyroid with thyroxine replacement for hypothyroidism in primary care over two years. Thyroxine under-replacement was associated with male gender and obesity. The proportion of euthyroid patients developing abnormal thyroid function doubled with TFTs at six, 12 and 24-month intervals.

Factors contributing to high levothyroxine doses in primary hypothyroidism: an interventional audit of a large community database

BACKGROUND

While few hypothyroid patients require more than the expected weight-related dose of levothyroxine, the underlying causes of larger-than-expected dosing requirements have not been studied in a single cohort. Our aim was to determine and quantify the multiple factors contributing to high-dose levothyroxine requirements in a cohort of patients with hypothyroidism.

METHODS

The Grampian Automated Follow-Up Register (GAFUR) monitors around 17,500 hypothyroid patients. In 2008, 190 (1%) patients took >225 μg of levothyroxine daily. A questionnaire was sent to 174 patients (16 were untraceable) to assess causes and to offer blood tests for endomysial, parietal cell (PCA), and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) autoantibodies. Primary care practices were contacted for medication details. All patients with positive endomysial autoantibodies were referred to a gastroenterologist. Thyroid function tests and levothyroxine doses were re-evaluated in 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 125 questionnaires (72%) were returned. Mean levothyroxine dose was 248 μg daily. Twenty-six patients (20.8%) took medication known to interfere with levothyroxine absorption, and 21 patients (16.8%) admitted to compliance issues. Seven patients had positive anti-endomysial antibodies on initial screening, with four being new diagnoses of celiac disease, and PCA were positive in 27 (21.6%) patients. At follow-up in 2011, the mean levothyroxine dose had decreased in patients on interfering medications and in the four new cases of celiac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Causes of patients needing high-dose levothyroxine replacement include poor compliance, medication interference, PCA (as a marker of atrophic/autoimmune gastritis), and celiac disease. Doses can be decreased following advice regarding medication or after management of underlying conditions.

Levothyroxine dosage is associated with stability of thyroid-stimulating hormone values

OBJECTIVE

In patients treated for hypothyroidism, the usual practice is to monitor thyroid-stimulating hormone values yearly once a therapeutic dosage of levothyroxine is determined. This study investigates whether there are any clinical predictors that could identify a subset of patients who might be monitored safely on a less frequent basis.

METHODS

With the use of a retrospective study design, 715 patients treated for hypothyroidism who had a normal (ie, therapeutic) thyroid-stimulating hormone value in 2006 while taking levothyroxine were identified. All thyroid-stimulating hormone values were then obtained through December 31, 2012. By using a Cox proportional hazard model, gender, age, body mass index, history of chronic autoimmune thyroiditis, initial thyroid-stimulating hormone level, and levothyroxine dose were analyzed for time to first abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone value.

RESULTS

Age, gender, history of chronic autoimmune thyroiditis, and body mass index at the time of initial normal thyroid-stimulating hormone were not associated significantly with time to abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone value. Levothyroxine dose >125 μg/day had an increased hazard ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.4; P < .0001) for time to first follow-up abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone value, but dosages less than that did not increase the hazard ratio. One year after the initial normal thyroid-stimulating hormone value, 91.1% of patients taking ≤ 125 μg/day had a continued normal thyroid-stimulating hormone, whereas only 73.3% of patients taking >125 μg/day did. Transformed thyroid-stimulating hormone value (which represents a measure of how far the initial thyroid-stimulating hormone was from the midpoint of the normal range) also had an increased hazard ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.2; P < .0001) for time to first abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone value.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients receiving ≤ 125 μg/day of levothyroxine, we propose that a testing interval up to 2 years may be acceptable if their thyroid-stimulating hormone is well within the normal range.

Treatment for primary hypothyroidism: current approaches and future possibilities

Primary hypothyroidism is the most common endocrine disease. Although the diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism is often considered simple, there are large numbers of people with this condition who are suboptimally treated. Even in those people with hypothyroidism who are biochemically euthyroid on levothyroxine replacement there is a significant proportion who report poorer quality of life. This review explores the historical and current treatment options for hypothyroidism, reasons for and potential solutions to suboptimal treatment, and future possibilities in the treatment of hypothyroidism.

Adequacy of thyroid hormone replacement in a general population

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal thyroid hormone replacement may carry harmful health consequences.

AIMS

Our objectives were to determine the prevalence and factors associated with inadequate replacement in patients receiving treatment with levothyroxine.

DESIGN

Retrospective general practice audit.

METHODS

We identified levothyroxine users through electronic searches of primary care records in all 11 practices within a county borough. The adequacy of thyroid hormone replacement was determined from the current serum, serum thyrotropin (TSH) as: (i) adequate replacement (normal TSH; 0.4-4.0 mU/l); (ii) over replacement (low TSH; <0.4 mU/l); and (iii) under replacement (high TSH; >4.0 mU/l).

RESULTS

Out of a registered patient population of 58 567, we identified 1037 patients who were first included in the hypothyroidism disease register between January 2004 and December 2009 (mean age 62.4 ± 15.9 years; female 85.9%, male 14.1%). Inadequate replacement was seen in 385 patients (37.2%), comprising 205 patients (19.8%) with over replacement and 180 patients (17.4%) with under replacement. Step-wise logistic regression showed that the factors associated with under replacement were male gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.85, confidence interval (CI) 1.86-4.38; P < 0.001 and younger age (OR 0.88, CI 0.80-0.98; P = 0.02 per 10 year increase in age) while longer duration of treatment was associated with over-treatment (OR 1.06, CI 1.01-1.10). A thyroid function test was performed in the preceding 12 months in 914 patients (88.1%) and appropriate dose adjustments had been made in 81.0% (312/385) of patients with abnormal results.

CONCLUSION

Despite frequent monitoring and dose adjustment activities, inadequate thyroid hormone replacement remained a problem in over a third of levothyroxine users in this population.