1
|
A Tripartite Knowledge Translation Program: Innovative Patient-Centered Approach to Clinical Research Participation for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Int 2021; 2021:5531693. [PMID: 34327022 PMCID: PMC8310439 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5531693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Knowledge translation (KT) models that represent an individual's perspective are a sign of effective KT. Some common challenges in KT include participant engagement, organization of the team, and time demands of the participants. We implemented a unique tripartite KT program to (1) share current research, (2) inform persons living with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) about the clinical research process, and (3) invite pwMS to immediately participate in clinical research. The primary aim was to determine participants' perspectives on the value and acceptability of an experiential research program offered at a patient and family educational conference. Methods A team of researchers identified factors that would impact the logistics of hosting an experiential research program at a conference and designed a unique tripartite KT program. The local multiple sclerosis (MS) society was engaged to select an appropriate location and invite stakeholders to the conference. A survey to determine participants' perspectives on the value and acceptability of the experiential research program was developed and analyzed. Results 65 pwMS attended the conference, and 44 (67.7%) participated in the on-site experiential research program. 72.7% of the participants completed the survey, of which 93.8% stated that they strongly agree or agree with the following statements: "Did you feel like participating in research today was a valuable experience to you?" and "Did you feel like you were contributing to MS research?" 100% of the participants agreed or strongly agreed when asked "would you like to see more research activities taking place at these kinds of events?" Conclusions This paper describes the logistics and challenges of conducting an experiential KT program, which proved to be rewarding for pwMS. The majority of pwMS attending the conference agreed to participate in the on-site experiential research program and an overwhelming majority of participants felt the experience was valuable.
Collapse
|
2
|
Colombo C, Confalonieri P, Rovaris M, La Mantia L, Galeazzi P, Silena Trevisan, Pariani A, Gerevini S, De Stefano N, Guglielmino R, Caserta C, Mosconi P, Filippini G. The IN-DEEP project "INtegrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences, Preferences": a web information model on magnetic resonance imaging for people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2020; 267:2421-2431. [PMID: 32361839 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09864-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The IN-DEEP project aims to provide people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) with evidence-based information on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis and monitoring the disease through a website, and to collect their opinions on the clarity of the website's contents and its usefulness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multidisciplinary advisory board committee was set up. We investigated the experience, attitude and information needs on MRI through three meetings with 24 PwMS, facilitated by an expert researcher and an observer. We developed the website on the basis of input from PwMS and systematic reviews and guidelines, assessed with AMSTAR and AGREE II. We sought feedback from nine PwMS who pilot-tested the beta-version of the website, during a meeting and through phone interviews and judged whether the contents were clear, understandable and useful, and the website was easily navigable. The website is in Italian. RESULTS The website ( https://www.istituto-besta.it/in-deep-risonanza-magnetica2 ) provides two levels of information, different layouts and visualization of data covering MRI diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, contents on how MRI can monitor PwMS over time to determine changes in the condition and evaluate treatment effects, practical information on how to prepare for the exam, educational tools and a glossary. The website was judged clear and useful by a sample of PwMS. CONCLUSIONS The website is a tool to address PwMS information needs on the role of MRI. It could be used by neurologists to facilitate communication with PwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Colombo
- Laboratory of Research and Consumer Involvement, Department of Public Health, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Confalonieri
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Unit of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rovaris
- IRCCS Don C. Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy
| | - Loredana La Mantia
- IRCCS Don C. Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Simonetta Gerevini
- Unit of Neuroradiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Roberta Guglielmino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy
| | - Cinzia Caserta
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Policlinico G. Rodolico, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Paola Mosconi
- Laboratory of Research and Consumer Involvement, Department of Public Health, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, 20156, Milan, Italy
| | - Graziella Filippini
- Scientific Direction, Carlo Besta Foundation and Neurological Institute, via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Synnot AJ, Cherry CL, Summers MP, Stuckey R, Milne CA, Lowe DB, Hill SJ. Consumer engagement critical to success in an Australian research project: reflections from those involved. Aust J Prim Health 2019; 24:197-203. [PMID: 29875031 DOI: 10.1071/py17107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This paper describes the people, activities and methods of consumer engagement in a complex research project, and reflects on the influence this had on the research and people involved, and enablers and challenges of engagement. The 2.5-year Integrating and Deriving Evidence Experiences and Preferences (IN-DEEP) study was conducted to develop online consumer summaries of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment evidence in partnership with a three-member consumer advisory group. Engagement methods included 6-monthly face-to-face meetings and email contact. Advisory group members were active in planning, conduct and dissemination and translational phases of the research. Engaging consumers in this way improved the quality of the research process and outputs by: being more responsive to, and reflective of, the experiences of Australians with MS; expanding the research reach and depth; and improving the researchers' capacity to manage study challenges. Advisory group members found contributing their expertise to MS research satisfying and empowering, whereas researchers gained confidence in the research direction. Managing the unpredictability of MS was a substantive challenge; the key enabler was the 'brokering role' of the researcher based at an MS organisation. Meaningfully engaging consumers with a range of skills, experiences and networks can make important and unforeseen contributions to research success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneliese J Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3068, Australia
| | - Catherine L Cherry
- Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia
| | - Michael P Summers
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3068, Australia
| | - Rwth Stuckey
- Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Melbourne, Vic. 3086, Australia
| | - Catherine A Milne
- Sydney Health Ethics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Dianne B Lowe
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3068, Australia
| | - Sophie J Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Vic. 3068, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Köpke S, Solari A, Rahn A, Khan F, Heesen C, Giordano A. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD008757. [PMID: 30317542 PMCID: PMC6517040 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008757.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are confronted with a number of important uncertainties concerning many aspects of the disease. These include diagnosis, prognosis, disease course, disease-modifying therapies, symptomatic therapies, and non-pharmacological interventions, among others. While people with MS demand adequate information to be able to actively participate in medical decision making and to self manage their disease, it has been shown that patients' disease-related knowledge is poor, therefore guidelines recommend clear and concise high-quality information at all stages of the disease. Several studies have outlined communication and information deficits in the care of people with MS. However, only a few information and decision support programmes have been published. OBJECTIVES The primary objectives of this updated review was to evaluate the effectiveness of information provision interventions for people with MS that aim to promote informed choice and improve patient-relevant outcomes, Further objectives were to evaluate the components and the developmental processes of the complex interventions used, to highlight the quantity and the certainty of the research evidence available, and to set an agenda for future research. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register, which contains trials from CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2017, Issue 11), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, PEDro, and clinical trials registries (29 November 2017) as well as other sources. We also searched reference lists of identified articles and contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-randomised controlled trials, and quasi-randomised trials comparing information provision for people with MS or suspected MS (intervention groups) with usual care or other types of information provision (control groups) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved articles for relevance and methodological quality and extracted data. Critical appraisal of studies addressed the risk of selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, and detection bias. We contacted authors of relevant studies for additional information. MAIN RESULTS We identified one new RCT (73 participants), which when added to the 10 previously included RCTs resulted in a total of 11 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria and were analysed (1387 participants overall; mean age, range: 31 to 51; percentage women, range: 63% to 100%; percentage relapsing-remitting MS course, range: 45% to 100%). The interventions addressed a variety of topics using different approaches for information provision in different settings. Topics included disease-modifying therapy, relapse management, self care strategies, fatigue management, family planning, and general health promotion. The active intervention components included decision aids, decision coaching, educational programmes, self care programmes, and personal interviews with physicians. All studies used one or more components, but the number and extent differed markedly between studies. The studies had a variable risk of bias. We did not perform meta-analyses due to marked clinical heterogeneity. All five studies assessing MS-related knowledge (505 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) detected significant differences between groups as a result of the interventions, indicating that information provision may successfully increase participants' knowledge. There were mixed results on decision making (five studies, 793 participants; low-certainty evidence) and quality of life (six studies, 671 participants; low-certainty evidence). No adverse events were detected in the seven studies reporting this outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Information provision for people with MS seems to increase disease-related knowledge, with less clear results on decision making and quality of life. The included studies in this review reported no negative side effects of providing disease-related information to people with MS. Interpretation of study results remains challenging due to the marked heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Köpke
- University of LübeckNursing Research Group, Institute of Social Medicine and EpidemiologyRatzeburger Allee 160LübeckGermanyD‐23538
| | - Alessandra Solari
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. ‐ Neurological Institute Carlo BestaNeuroepidemiology UnitVia Celoria 11MilanItaly20133
| | - Anne Rahn
- University Medical CenterInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple SclerosisMartinistr 52HamburgGermany20246
| | - Fary Khan
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park CampusDepartment of Rehabilitation MedicinePoplar RoadParkvilleMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - Christoph Heesen
- University Medical CenterInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple SclerosisMartinistr 52HamburgGermany20246
| | - Andrea Giordano
- Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. ‐ Neurological Institute Carlo BestaNeuroepidemiology UnitVia Celoria 11MilanItaly20133
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Synnot AJ, Hawkins M, Merner BA, Summers MP, Filippini G, Osborne RH, Shapland SD, Cherry CL, Stuckey R, Milne CA, Mosconi P, Colombo C, Hill SJ. Producing an evidence-based treatment information website in partnership with people affected by multiple sclerosis. Health Sci Rep 2018; 1:e24. [PMID: 30623063 PMCID: PMC6266475 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In earlier work, we identified that people affected by multiple sclerosis (MS) can have difficulty finding online treatment information that is up to date, trustworthy, understandable, and applicable to personal circumstances, but does not provoke confusion or negative emotional consequences. The objective was to develop online consumer summaries of MS treatment evidence (derived from Cochrane Reviews) that respond to identified treatment information needs of people affected by MS. METHODS A 2-phase mixed-methods project, conducted in partnership with consumers and an MS organisation. Phase 1 included review panels with consumers (Australians affected by MS) and health professionals to test paper-based treatment summaries before development, and pilot testing of the website. Phase 2 involved an online survey after website launch. RESULTS Eighty-three participants (85% affected by MS) took part. Phase 1 participants strongly endorsed key review summary components, including layering information, and additional sections to aid personal applicability. Participants additionally suggested questions for health professionals. Participants across both phases were receptive to the idea of being provided with Cochrane Review summaries online but were seeking other types of evidence and information, such as personal experiences and the latest experimental treatments, which could not be provided. While the small survey sample size (n = 58) limits application of the results to a broader population, the website was viewed favourably, as a useful, understandable, and trustworthy information source. CONCLUSION We describe a partnership approach to developing online evidence-based treatment information, underpinned by an in-depth understanding of consumers' information needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneliese J. Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Melanie Hawkins
- Health Systems Improvement Unit, Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health and Social DevelopmentDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
| | - Bronwen A. Merner
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Michael P. Summers
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Graziella Filippini
- Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Review Group, Scientific DirectionIRCCS Foundation Neurological Institute Carlo BestaMilanItaly
| | - Richard H. Osborne
- Health Systems Improvement Unit, Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health and Social DevelopmentDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
| | | | - Catherine L. Cherry
- Burnet Institute, Department of Infectious DiseasesThe Alfred Hospital and Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
- Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Rwth Stuckey
- Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, School of Psychology and Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Catherine A. Milne
- Centre for Values, Ethics and Law in MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Paola Mosconi
- Laboratory for Medical Research and Consumer Involvement, Department of Public HealthIRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario NegriMilanItaly
| | - Cinzia Colombo
- Laboratory for Medical Research and Consumer Involvement, Department of Public HealthIRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario NegriMilanItaly
| | - Sophie J. Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perspectives from the Patient and the Healthcare Professional in Multiple Sclerosis: Social Media and Patient Education. Neurol Ther 2017; 7:23-36. [PMID: 29243028 PMCID: PMC5990508 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-017-0087-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is life-altering. Because the course of MS is heterogeneous, patients may face uncertainty in terms of long-term physical and cognitive challenges, potential loss of employment, and the risk of social isolation. Patients often turn to the Internet and social media for information about MS and its management, and to seek out fellow patients and support groups. Here, we examine the use of social media and the Internet among patients with MS, considering its impact on patient education. We consider the access that these conduits provide not only to other patients with MS but also to a wealth of disease-related information online. These themes are further illustrated with first-hand experiences of the patient author and her physician. We also explore the impact of the Internet and social media on the education and support of patients with MS from the healthcare professional’s (HCP’s) perspective, including opportunities for HCPs to promote disease education among their patients, and the advantages that arise from patients being better informed about their disease. The rise of the Internet and social media has changed the patient experience, helping patients to support each other, to educate themselves proactively about their condition, and to participate more actively in decisions relating to disease management than perhaps was the case historically. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Guéguen A, Maillart E, Gallice T, Allaf B. Evaluation of French-language internet sites dealing with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2017; 2:2055217316652419. [PMID: 28607728 PMCID: PMC5433325 DOI: 10.1177/2055217316652419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Information available on the internet has changed patient–neurologist relationships.
Its evaluation for multiple sclerosis is only partial, regardless of the language
used. Objective We aim to evaluate the content quality and ranking indexes of French-language sites
dealing with multiple sclerosis. Methods Two French terms and three search engines were used to identify the sites whose ranking
indexes were calculated according to their positions on each page designated by the
search engines. Three evaluators used the DISCERN questionnaire to assess the content
quality of the 25 selected sites. The sites were classified according to the mean of the
evaluators’ grades. Grading agreement between evaluators was calculated. Ranking indexes
were computed as a rank/100. Results Content level was deemed mediocre, with poor referencing of the information provided.
The naïve and two expert evaluators’ grades differed. Content quality disparity was
found within the different website categories, except for institutional sites. No
correlation was found between content quality and ranking index. Conclusion The information available was heterogeneous. Physicians should guide patients in their
internet searches for information so that they can benefit from good-quality input which
is potentially able to improve their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Guéguen
- Service de Neurologie, Fondation Ophtalmologique A. de Rothschild, Paris, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Filippini G, Del Giovane C, Clerico M, Beiki O, Mattoscio M, Piazza F, Fredrikson S, Tramacere I, Scalfari A, Salanti G. Treatment with disease-modifying drugs for people with a first clinical attack suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4:CD012200. [PMID: 28440858 PMCID: PMC6478290 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012200.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of multiple sclerosis has changed over the last 20 years. The advent of disease-modifying drugs in the mid-1990s heralded a period of rapid progress in the understanding and management of multiple sclerosis. With the support of magnetic resonance imaging early diagnosis is possible, enabling treatment initiation at the time of the first clinical attack. As most of the disease-modifying drugs are associated with adverse events, patients and clinicians need to weigh the benefit and safety of the various early treatment options before taking informed decisions. OBJECTIVES 1. to estimate the benefit and safety of disease-modifying drugs that have been evaluated in all studies (randomised or non-randomised) for the treatment of a first clinical attack suggestive of MS compared either with placebo or no treatment;2. to assess the relative efficacy and safety of disease-modifying drugs according to their benefit and safety;3. to estimate the benefit and safety of disease-modifying drugs that have been evaluated in all studies (randomised or non-randomised) for treatment started after a first attack ('early treatment') compared with treatment started after a second attack or at another later time point ('delayed treatment'). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO trials registry, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports, and searched for unpublished studies (until December 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and observational studies that evaluated one or more drugs as monotherapy in adult participants with a first clinical attack suggestive of MS. We considered evidence on alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, daclizumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, immunoglobulins, interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a (Rebif®, Avonex®), laquinimod, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, pegylated interferon beta-1a, rituximab and teriflunomide. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two teams of three authors each independently selected studies and extracted data. The primary outcomes were disability-worsening, relapses, occurrence of at least one serious adverse event (AE) and withdrawing from the study or discontinuing the drug because of AEs. Time to conversion to clinically definite MS (CDMS) defined by Poser diagnostic criteria, and probability to discontinue the treatment or dropout for any reason were recorded as secondary outcomes. We synthesized study data using random-effects meta-analyses and performed indirect comparisons between drugs. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) along with relative 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes. We estimated the absolute effects only for primary outcomes. We evaluated the credibility of the evidence using the GRADE system. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 randomised trials, eight open-label extension studies (OLEs) and four cohort studies published between 2010 and 2016. The overall risk of bias was high and the reporting of AEs was scarce. The quality of the evidence associated with the results ranges from low to very low. Early treatment versus placebo during the first 24 months' follow-upThere was a small, non-significant advantage of early treatment compared with placebo in disability-worsening (6.4% fewer (13.9 fewer to 3 more) participants with disability-worsening with interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) or teriflunomide) and in relapses (10% fewer (20.3 fewer to 2.8 more) participants with relapses with teriflunomide). Early treatment was associated with 1.6% fewer participants with at least one serious AE (3 fewer to 0.2 more). Participants on early treatment were on average 4.6% times (0.3 fewer to 15.4 more) more likely to withdraw from the study due to AEs. This result was mostly driven by studies on interferon beta 1-b, glatiramer acetate and cladribine that were associated with significantly more withdrawals for AEs. Early treatment decreased the hazard of conversion to CDMS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.60). Comparing active interventions during the first 24 months' follow-upIndirect comparison of interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) with teriflunomide did not show any difference on reducing disability-worsening (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.66). We found no differences between the included drugs with respect to the hazard of conversion to CDMS. Interferon beta-1a (Rebif®) and teriflunomide were associated with fewer dropouts because of AEs compared with interferon beta-1b, cladribine and glatiramer acetate (ORs range between 0.03 and 0.29, with substantial uncertainty). Early versus delayed treatmentWe did not find evidence of differences between early and delayed treatments for disability-worsening at a maximum of five years' follow-up (3% fewer participants with early treatment (15 fewer to 11.1 more)). There was important variability across interventions; early treatment with interferon beta-1b considerably reduced the odds of participants with disability-worsening during three and five years' follow-up (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.84 and OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.89). The early treatment group had 19.6% fewer participants with relapses (26.7 fewer to 12.7 fewer) compared to late treatment at a maximum of five years' follow-up and early treatment decreased the hazard of conversion to CDMS at any follow-up up to 10 years (i.e. over five years' follow-up HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.73). We did not draw any conclusions on long-term serious AEs or discontinuation due to AEs because of inadequacies in the available data both in the included OLEs and cohort studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Very low-quality evidence suggests a small and uncertain benefit with early treatment compared with placebo in reducing disability-worsening and relapses. The advantage of early treatment compared with delayed on disability-worsening was heterogeneous depending on the actual drug used and based on very low-quality evidence. Low-quality evidence suggests that the chances of relapse are less with early treatment compared with delayed. Early treatment reduced the hazard of conversion to CDMS compared either with placebo, no treatment or delayed treatment, both in short- and long-term follow-up. Low-quality evidence suggests that early treatment is associated with fewer participants with at least one serious AE compared with placebo. Very low-quality evidence suggests that, compared with placebo, early treatment leads to more withdrawals or treatment discontinuation due to AEs. Difference between drugs on short-term benefit and safety was uncertain because few studies and only indirect comparisons were available. Long-term safety of early treatment is uncertain because of inadequately reported or unavailable data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziella Filippini
- Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaScientific Directionvia Celoria, 11MilanItaly20133
| | - Cinzia Del Giovane
- University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaCochrane Italy, Department of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health MedicineVia del Pozzo 71ModenaItaly41124
| | - Marinella Clerico
- AOU San Luigi GonzagaUniversity of Turin, Division of NeurologyRegione Gonzole, 13OrbassanoItaly10043
| | | | - Miriam Mattoscio
- Imperial College LondonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Brain Sciences, Centre for Neuroscience, Wolfson Neuroscience LaboratoriesDu Cane RoadLondonUKW12 0NN
| | - Federico Piazza
- AOU San Luigi GonzagaUniversity of Turin, Division of NeurologyRegione Gonzole, 13OrbassanoItaly10043
| | - Sten Fredrikson
- Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Clinical NeuroscienceStockholmSweden17177
| | - Irene Tramacere
- Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaScientific Directionvia Celoria, 11MilanItaly20133
| | - Antonio Scalfari
- Imperial College LondonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Brain Sciences, Centre for Neuroscience, Wolfson Neuroscience LaboratoriesDu Cane RoadLondonUKW12 0NN
| | - Georgia Salanti
- University of BernInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)Finkenhubelweg 11BernSwitzerland3005
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Synnot AJ, Hill SJ, Garner KA, Summers MP, Filippini G, Osborne RH, Shapland SD, Colombo C, Mosconi P. Online health information seeking: how people with multiple sclerosis find, assess and integrate treatment information to manage their health. Health Expect 2016; 19:727-37. [PMID: 25165024 PMCID: PMC5055229 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The Internet is increasingly prominent as a source of health information for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). But there has been little exploration of the needs, experiences and preferences of people with MS for integrating treatment information into decision making, in the context of searching on the Internet. This was the aim of our study. DESIGN Sixty participants (51 people with MS; nine family members) took part in a focus group or online forum. They were asked to describe how they find and assess reliable treatment information (particularly online) and how this changes over time. Thematic analysis was underpinned by a coding frame. RESULTS Participants described that there was both too much information online and too little that applied to them. They spoke of wariness and scepticism but also empowerment. The availability of up-to-date and unbiased treatment information, including practical and lifestyle-related information, was important to many. Many participants were keen to engage in a 'research partnership' with health professionals and developed a range of strategies to enhance the trustworthiness of online information. We use the term 'self-regulation' to capture the variations in information seeking behaviour that participants described over time, as they responded to their changing information needs, their emotional state and growing expertise about MS. CONCLUSIONS People with MS have developed a number of strategies to both find and integrate treatment information from a range of sources. Their reflections informed the development of an evidence-based consumer web site based on summaries of MS Cochrane reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneliese J. Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and ParticipationDepartment of Public HealthSchool of Public Health and Human BiosciencesLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Sophie J. Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and ParticipationDepartment of Public HealthSchool of Public Health and Human BiosciencesLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Kerryn A. Garner
- Centre for Health Communication and ParticipationDepartment of Public HealthSchool of Public Health and Human BiosciencesLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Michael P. Summers
- Centre for Health Communication and ParticipationDepartment of Public HealthSchool of Public Health and Human BiosciencesLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Graziella Filippini
- Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Review GroupUnit of NeuroepidemiologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico, C. BestaMilanItaly
| | - Richard H. Osborne
- Public Health InnovationPopulation Health Strategic Research CentreSchool of Health and Social DevelopmentDeakin UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
| | | | - Cinzia Colombo
- Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvementDepartment of Public HealthIRCSS‐Mario NegriInstitute for Pharmacological ResearchMilanItaly
| | - Paola Mosconi
- Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvementDepartment of Public HealthIRCSS‐Mario NegriInstitute for Pharmacological ResearchMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Colombo C, Filippini G, Synnot A, Hill S, Guglielmino R, Traversa S, Confalonieri P, Mosconi P, Tramacere I. Development and assessment of a website presenting evidence-based information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project. BMC Neurol 2016; 16:30. [PMID: 26934873 PMCID: PMC4776365 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0552-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are increasingly using the Internet in the daily management of their condition. They search for high-quality information in plain language, from independent sources, based on reliable and up-to-date evidence. The Integrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences and Preferences (IN-DEEP) project in Italy and Australia aimed to provide people with MS and family members with an online source of evidence-based information, starting from their information needs. This paper reports on the Italian project’s website. Methods Contents, layout and wording were developed with people with MS and pilot-tested. The website was evaluated using an online 29-item questionnaire for ease of language, contents, navigation, and usefulness of information aimed at people with MS, family members and the general population. Results The website (http://indeep.istituto-besta.it/) is structured in multiple levels of information. The first topic was interferons-β for people with relapsing-remitting MS. In all, 433 people responded to the survey (276 people with MS, 68 family members and 89 others). The mean age was 45 years, almost 90 % had a high school diploma, about 80 % had relapsing-remitting MS, and the median disease duration was seven years. About 90 % judged the website clear, understandable, useful, and easy to navigate. Ninety percent of people with MS and family members would recommend it to others. Sixty-two percent reported they felt confident in making decisions on interferons-β after reading the website. Conclusions The model was judged clear and useful. It could be adapted to other topics and diseases. Clinicians may find it useful in their relationship with patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0552-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Colombo
- Department of Public Health, Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvement, IRCCS Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, via la Masa 19, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Graziella Filippini
- Scientific Direction, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy. .,Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Review Group, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Anneliese Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Plenty Road & Kingsbury Drive, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia. .,National Trauma Research Institute, Monash University/The Alfred, Level 4, 89 Commercial Road Melbourne, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Plenty Road & Kingsbury Drive, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
| | - Roberta Guglielmino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Silvia Traversa
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Paolo Confalonieri
- Department of Neuroimmunology, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, Via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paola Mosconi
- Department of Public Health, Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvement, IRCCS Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, via la Masa 19, 20156, Milan, Italy.
| | - Irene Tramacere
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Review Group, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, Via G. Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Colombo C, Mosconi P, Confalonieri P, Baroni I, Traversa S, Hill SJ, Synnot AJ, Oprandi N, Filippini G. Web search behavior and information needs of people with multiple sclerosis: focus group study and analysis of online postings. Interact J Med Res 2014; 3:e12. [PMID: 25093374 PMCID: PMC4150054 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.3034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2013] [Revised: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 05/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and their family members increasingly seek health information on the Internet. There has been little exploration of how MS patients integrate health information with their needs, preferences, and values for decision making. The INtegrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences, and Preferences (IN-DEEP) project is a collaboration between Italian and Australian researchers and MS patients, aimed to make high-quality evidence accessible and meaningful to MS patients and families, developing a Web-based resource of evidence-based information starting from their information needs. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to analyze MS patients and their family members' experience about the Web-based health information, to evaluate how they asses this information, and how they integrate health information with personal values. METHODS We organized 6 focus groups, 3 with MS patients and 3 with family members, in the Northern, Central, and Southern parts of Italy (April-June 2011). They included 40 MS patients aged between 18 and 60, diagnosed as having MS at least 3 months earlier, and 20 family members aged 18 and over, being relatives of a person with at least a 3-months MS diagnosis. The focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim (Atlas software, V 6.0). Data were analyzed from a conceptual point of view through a coding system. An online forum was hosted by the Italian MS society on its Web platform to widen the collection of information. Nine questions were posted covering searching behavior, use of Web-based information, truthfulness of Web information. At the end, posts were downloaded and transcribed. RESULTS Information needs covered a comprehensive communication of diagnosis, prognosis, and adverse events of treatments, MS causes or risk factors, new drugs, practical, and lifestyle-related information. The Internet is considered useful by MS patients, however, at the beginning or in a later stage of the disease a refusal to actively search for information could occur. Participants used to search on the Web before or after their neurologist's visit or when a new therapy was proposed. Social networks are widely used to read others' stories and retrieve information about daily management. A critical issue was the difficulty of recognizing reliable information on the Web. Many sources were used but the neurologist was mostly the final source of treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS MS patients used the Internet as a tool to integrate information about the illness. Information needs covered a wide spectrum, the searched topics changed with progression of the disease. Criteria for evaluating Internet accuracy and credibility of information were often lacking or generic. This may limit the empowerment of patients in health care choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Colombo
- IRCCS-Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milano, Italy, Department of Public Health, Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvement, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Köpke S, Solari A, Khan F, Heesen C, Giordano A. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD008757. [PMID: 24752330 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008757.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are confronted with a number of important uncertainties concerning many aspects of the disease. Among others, these include diagnosis, prognosis, disease course, disease-modifying therapies, symptomatic therapies and non-pharmacological interventions. It has been shown that people with MS demand adequate information to be able to actively participate in medical decision making and to self-manage their disease. On the other hand, it has been found that patients' disease-related knowledge is poor. Therefore, guidelines have recommended clear and concise high-quality information at all stages of the disease. Several studies have outlined communication and information deficits in the care of people with MS and, accordingly, a number of information and decision support programmes have been published. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of information provision interventions for people with MS that aim to promote informed choice and improve patient-relevant outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register which contains trials from CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 6), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, PEDro and clinical trials registries (12 June 2013) as well as other sources. In addition, we searched PsycINFO, trial registries, and reference lists of identified articles. We also contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials, cluster randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials comparing information provision for people with MS or suspected MS (intervention groups) with usual care or other types of information provision (control groups) were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved articles for relevance and methodological quality, and extracted data. Critical appraisal of studies addressed the risk of selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias and detection bias. We contacted authors of relevant studies for additional information. MAIN RESULTS Ten randomised controlled trials involving a total of 1314 participants met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. The interventions addressed a variety of topics using different approaches for information provision in different settings. Topics included disease-modifying therapy, relapse management, self-care strategies, fatigue management, family planning and general health promotion. The interventions contained decision aids, educational programmes, self-care interventions and personal interviews with physicians. All interventions were complex interventions using more than one active component, but the number and extent of the intervention components differed markedly between studies. The studies had a variable risk of bias. We did not perform meta-analyses due to marked clinical heterogeneity. All four studies assessing MS-related knowledge (524 participants; moderate-quality evidence) detected significant differences between groups as a result of the interventions indicating that information provision may successfully increase participants' knowledge. There were mixed results from four studies reporting effects on decision making (836 participants; low-quality evidence) and from five studies assessing quality of life (605 participants; low-quality evidence). There were no adverse events in the six studies reporting on adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Information provision for people with MS seems to increase disease-related knowledge, with less clear results on decision making and quality of life. There seem to be no negative side effects from informing patients about their disease. Interpretation of study results remains challenging due to the marked heterogeneity of the interventions and outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Köpke
- Nursing Research Unit, Institute of Social Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, Germany, D-23538
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Synnot A, Hill S, Summers M, Taylor M. Comparing face-to-face and online qualitative research with people with multiple sclerosis. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2014; 24:431-438. [PMID: 24572010 DOI: 10.1177/1049732314523840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
We compared face-to-face focus groups and an online forum in qualitative research with people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and family members. Although the merits and challenges of online qualitative research have been considered by others, there is limited literature directly comparing these two data collection methods for people with disability or chronic illness. Twenty-seven people participated in one of four focus groups and 33 people took part in an online forum. Demographic and MS-related characteristics were similar between the two groups, with a slight nonsignificant trend toward nonmetropolitan residence in online forum participants. There was a high level of overlap in the themes generated between groups. Participant responses in the online forum were more succinct and on-topic, yet in the focus groups interaction was greater. Online qualitative research methods can facilitate research participation for people with chronic illness or disability, yielding generally comparable information to that gathered via face-to-face methods.
Collapse
|
14
|
Prictor M, Hill S. Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group: leading the field on health communication evidence. J Evid Based Med 2013; 6:216-20. [PMID: 24325413 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of the history and achievements of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, part of the international Cochrane Collaboration. It surveys the Group's establishment and structure, the scope of its Cochrane Reviews and the growth in its publication output over its 16-year history. The paper examines the Group's developmental work in interventions and outcomes related to patient communication and involvement, as well as methodological resources for review authors. It also outlines the Review Group's research partnerships with state, national and international agencies, particularly in the areas of chronic disease management, medicines use, public involvement, and vaccines communication. The Group's strong contribution to an evidence-base for health communication and participation are acknowledged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Prictor
- Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin IB, O'Sullivan PB, Coffin JA, Mak DB, Toussaint S, Straker LM. Disabling chronic low back pain as an iatrogenic disorder: a qualitative study in Aboriginal Australians. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e002654. [PMID: 23575999 PMCID: PMC3641505 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2013] [Accepted: 03/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the low back pain beliefs of Aboriginal Australians; a population previously identified as protected against the disabling effects of low back pain due to cultural beliefs. DESIGN Qualitative study employing culturally appropriate methods within a clinical ethnographic framework. SETTING One rural and two remote towns in Western Australia. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-two Aboriginal people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP; 21 men, 11 women). Participants included those who were highly, moderately and mildly disabled. RESULTS Most participants held biomedical beliefs about the cause of CLBP, attributing pain to structural/anatomical vulnerability of their spine. This belief was attributed to the advice from healthcare practitioners and the results of spinal radiological imaging. Negative causal beliefs and a pessimistic future outlook were more common among those who were more disabled. Conversely, those who were less disabled held more positive beliefs that did not originate from interactions with healthcare practitioners. CONCLUSIONS Findings are consistent with research in other populations and support that disabling CLBP may be at least partly iatrogenic. This raises concerns for all populations exposed to Western biomedical approaches to examination and management of low back pain. The challenge for healthcare practitioners dealing with people with low back pain from any culture is to communicate in a way that builds positive beliefs about low back pain and its future consequences, enhancing resilience to disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan B Lin
- Combined Universities Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, Geraldton, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Juli A Coffin
- Combined Universities Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, Geraldton, Western Australia, Australia and Geraldton Regional Aboriginal Medical Service, Geraldton, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Donna B Mak
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Sandy Toussaint
- Anthropology and Sociology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Leon M Straker
- School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|