Cost of managing an episode of relapse in multiple sclerosis in the United States

Multiple Sclerosis: An Emergency Medicine-Focused Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides a focused assessment of MS for emergency clinicians, including the presentation, evaluation, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

MS is an autoimmune disorder targeting the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by clinical relapses and radiological lesions disseminated in time and location. Patients with MS most commonly present with long tract signs (e.g., myelopathy, asymmetric spastic paraplegia, urinary dysfunction, Lhermitte's sign), optic neuritis, or brainstem syndromes (bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia). Cortical syndromes or multifocal presentations are less common. Radiologically isolated syndrome and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) may or may not progress to chronic forms of MS, including relapsing remitting MS, primary progressive MS, and secondary progressive MS. The foundation of outpatient management involves disease-modifying therapy, which is typically initiated with the first signs of disease onset. Management of CIS and acute flares of MS in the ED includes corticosteroid therapy, ideally after diagnostic testing with imaging and lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Emergency clinicians should evaluate whether patients with MS are presenting with new-onset debilitating neurological symptoms to avoid unnecessary testing and admissions, but failure to appropriately diagnose CIS or MS flare is associated with increased morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of MS can assist emergency clinicians in better diagnosing and managing this neurologically devastating disease.

Switching to second line MS disease-modifying therapies is associated with decreased relapse rate

Background and objectives

While randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for determining treatment efficacy, they do not capture the effectiveness of treatment during real-world use. We aimed to evaluate the association between demographics and multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy (DMT) exposure, including treatment adherence and switches between different DMTs, on the risk of subsequent MS relapse.

Methods

All persons with relapsing-onset MS (pwRMS) living in Manitoba between 1999 and 2014 were identified from provincial healthcare databases using a validated case definition. Use of DMTs was abstracted from the provincial drug database covering all residents of Manitoba, including use of any DMT, stopping/starting any DMT, switches between different DMTs and adherence as defined by cumulative medication possession ratios (CUMMPRs) of 50, 70, 80 and 90%. Time to first-treated relapse was used as the outcome of interest in logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazards regression models adjusting for demographic covariates including age and year of diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic status and number of medical comorbidities.

Results

1780 pwRMS were identified, including 1,510 who were on DMT at some point in the study period. While total DMT exposure was not associated with the time to subsequent treated relapse, individuals who switched between more than 2 DMTs had higher post-switch rates of relapse. Switching to second-line DMTs was associated with a longer time to treated relapse in comparison to those who remained on a first-line DMT (HR 0.44; 95%CI: 0.32-0.62, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Switching to high-efficacy DMTs reduces the rates of subsequent MS relapse at the population level.

Cost Per Relapse Avoided for Ozanimod Versus Other Selected Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the United States

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ozanimod compared with commonly used disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and safety data were obtained from a network meta-analysis (NMA) of clinical trials of RRMS treatments including ozanimod, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate. ARR-related number needed to treat (NNT) relative to placebo and annual total MS-related healthcare costs was used to estimate the incremental annual cost per relapse avoided with ozanimod vs each DMT. ARR and adverse event (AE) data were combined with drug costs and healthcare costs to manage relapses and AEs in order to estimate annual cost savings with ozanimod vs other DMTs, assuming a 1 million USD fixed treatment budget.

RESULTS

Treatment with ozanimod was associated with lower incremental annual healthcare costs to avoid a relapse, ranging from $843,684 vs interferon beta-1a (30 μg; 95% confidence interval [CI] - $1,431,619, - $255,749) to $72,847 (95% CI - $153,444, $7750) vs fingolimod. Compared with all other DMTs, ozanimod was associated with overall healthcare cost savings ranging from $8257 vs interferon beta-1a (30 μg) to $2178 vs fingolimod. Compared with oral DMTs, ozanimod was associated with annual cost savings of $6199 with teriflunomide 7 mg, $4737 with teriflunomide 14 mg, $2178 with fingolimod, and $2793 with dimethyl fumarate.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ozanimod was associated with substantial reductions in annual drug costs and total MS-related healthcare costs to avoid relapses compared with other DMTs. In the fixed-budget analysis, ozanimod demonstrated a favorable cost-effective profile relative to other DMTs.

Comparative efficacy and safety of disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, 19 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMTs in adults with RMS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicines Agency websites for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (from inception to July 2021). Eligible RCTs evaluated approved treatments for RMS as monotherapy and reported at least one of the primary outcome measures of interest. The primary outcome was efficacy (annualized relapse rate and 12-week confirmed disability progression) and safety (serious adverse events [AEs] and discontinuation due to AEs). We assessed the risk of bias (RoB) of included studies using the Cochrane RoB tool version 2.0 (https://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d5928) for RCTs. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was used to rank therapies and to assess quality of general evidence, respectively. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rank therapies and to assess quality of general evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 43 records represent 45 RCTs selected for network meta-analysis. In total, 30,720 participants (median of 732; interquartile range: 248-931) were included, of which 67% were female. By SUCRA analysis, alemtuzumab (94.3%) presented the highest probability of being the best alternative for annualized relapse rate, whereas ofatumumab (93.5%) presented the highest probability of being the best alternative for 12-week confirmed disability progression. Interferon beta-1b subcutaneous (87.0%) presented the highest probability of the best safety among all DMTs for serious AEs, whereas alemtuzumab (92.4%) presented the highest probability of the best safety among all DMTs for discontinuation due to AEs.

CONCLUSION

Network meta-analysis shows that alemtuzumab and ofatumumab present the highest efficacy among DMTs. Because there is little difference between these probabilities for many treatments, health professionals should use clinical shared decision making when formulating treatment plans with patients.

Cost of illness in multiple sclerosis by disease characteristics - A review of reviews

Introduction: In light of the increasing number of economic burden studies and heterogeneity in methodology and reporting standards, there is a need for robust evidence synthesis on an umbrella review level.Areas covered: We performed the first review of reviews of cost-of-illness studies in multiple sclerosis. Focusing on disaggregated costs by disease characteristics (disability level, relapse, disease course), we also characterized the underlying methodological evidence base of individual (primary) studies.Expert Commentary: We identified 17 reviews encompassing 111 unique primary studies, and a high degree of overlap across reviews. Costs were substantial, rising with disability level, relapse episodes, and disease progression. Disability was the key cost driver. Compared to mild disability, total costs for moderate disability were 1.4-2.3-fold higher and 1.8-2.9-fold higher for severe disability. With escalating disability, the share of costs outside the health system (indirect costs, informal care) increasingly outweighed the share of direct medical costs. Of all 111 primary studies, 72% gathered resource use/loss data by patient self-report. Associated costs were mostly reported by disability level (75%), followed by relapse (48%) and disease course (21%). In conclusion, although heterogeneity can make in-depth comparisons of costs across studies impossible, important patterns are broadly apparent.

Cost-Effectiveness of Repository Corticotropin Injection for the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations in Multiple Sclerosis

Background

Relapses are common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) despite treatment with disease-modifying therapies. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI, Acthar^® Gel), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) are alternative therapies for MS relapse. There is a dearth of economic assessments of these therapies for the acute exacerbations of MS. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of RCI compared to PMP or IVIg.

Methods

A Markov state-transition model compared outcomes (costs, relapses, remission, and utilities) with RCI versus PMP or IVIg for the acute exacerbations in MS. The model was developed from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over one to three years. Patients initiated on alternative therapies were evaluated in one-day increments for the first 30 days during treatment. The model assumes the natural history of MS after treatment in the first month, adjusting for the effect of treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The uncertainty in model parameters was evaluated in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results

In the base case, RCI has an ICER of USD 42,078 per QALY compared to PMP over one year from the payer perspective and is dominant over two and three years; RCI is dominant compared to PMP from the societal perspective over all three years. Compared to IVIg, RCI is a dominant strategy from both payer and societal perspectives over all three years. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supports the base case findings, suggesting that RCI may be cost-effective versus PMP and IVIg for acute exacerbations in MS.

Conclusion

RCI is a cost-effective alternative treatment for MS relapses compared to PMP and IVIg from the US payer and societal perspectives.

Cost-utility of oral methylprednisolone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: Results from the COPOUSEP trial

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that oral high-dose methylprednisolone (MP) is non-inferior to intravenous MP in treating multiple sclerosis relapses in terms of effectiveness and tolerance. In order to assist with resource allocation and decision-making, its cost-effectiveness must also be assessed. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-utility of per os high-dose MP as well as the cost-savings associated with implementing the strategy.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis at 28 days was carried out using data from the French COPOUSEP multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority trial and the statutory health insurance reimbursement database. Costs were calculated using a societal perspective, including both direct and indirect costs. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and bootstrapping methods assessed the uncertainty surrounding the results. An alternative scenario analysis in which MP was administered at home was also carried out. A budgetary impact analysis was carried at five years.

RESULTS

In the conditions of the trial (hospitalized patients), there was no significant difference in utilities and costs at 28 days. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €15,360 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. If multiple sclerosis relapses were treated at home, oral MP would be more effective, less costly and associated with annual savings up to 25 million euros for the French healthcare system.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral MP is cost-effective in the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses and associated with major savings.

Patients' experiences of self-identification, seeking support, and anticipation of potential relapse in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses are associated with increased disability, reduced quality of life and negative psychosocial impacts. However, they often go unrecognised; people with MS (MSers) may face barriers to self-identification of relapses or seeking support for them. The charity Shift.ms sought to better understand 1) MSers' challenges in self-identifying potential relapses, 2) where MSers' seek support for potential relapses, and 3) the impact of the anticipation of relapses on MSers' wellbeing and daily living.

METHODS

Shift.ms developed a patient perspective 8-question pilot survey (included likert-style, multiple-choice, and optional free-text responses) and shared it with Shift.ms' international online community (n = 20,052). Descriptive quantitative analysis, and content analysis and thematic analysis of qualitative free-text responses were used.

RESULTS

1,737 MSers responded. Just under one third (29.9%) of MSers reported that it takes them 24 h or less to self-identify a potential relapse, while more than half (54.5%) reported that identification occurs within 48 h; 55% MSers felt that the "at least 24 h" clinical criterion of relapse classification was appropriate. Challenges to relapse self-identification included confounding background symptoms or infection, variability of relapse symptoms, and individualistic nature of MS. Fatigue was reported to be the most common symptom of relapse (75%), however fatigue was also the symptom most commonly mistaken for relapse (40%). Barriers to relapse self-identification were a shorter duration since MS diagnosis and a perceived lack of consensus around relapse classification. Respondents reported they most often seek relapse support/advice from healthcare professionals (HCPs) (37.1%), family/friends (32.1%), or not at all (16.9%). Rather than temporal criteria (i.e. the 24 h criterion), participants felt that severity of symptoms could play a more critical role in whether to seek support for a potential relapse. Barriers to seeking support/advice included variability in HCP advice and feelings of invalidation. Anticipation of relapses negatively impacted MSers wellbeing; led to reduced participation in activities, and the development of adjustment/coping strategies. Relapse triggers included stress, reduced self-care, infection/illness; 78.5% reported stress or anxiety had triggered relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight difficulties MSers face in self-identifying relapses, barriers to accessing support, and impact of anticipation of relapses. They also highlight opportunities for improved MSer and HCP communication, dialogue and two-way education to help optimise patient access to relapse support and intervention.

Annual Cost Burden by Level of Relapse Severity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Introduction

The severity of relapses varies in multiple sclerosis (MS) and may lead to a differential cost burden. This study aimed to characterize the direct healthcare costs associated with relapses in patients with MS by the level of relapse severity.

Methods

This retrospective analysis used claims data extracted from the MarketScan^® Databases from January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2017 (study period January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2018). Adult patients with at least one diagnosis of MS and 12 months of continuous enrollment prior to the first MS diagnosis to 12 months after the index date were included. On the basis of the severity of the relapse, patients were stratified into three cohorts: severe relapse (SR), mild/moderate relapse (MMR), and no relapse (NR). All-cause and MS-related costs were analyzed during the 12-month follow-up period. Group differences were assessed using descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses.

Results

In total, 8775 patients with MS were analyzed: 6341 (72%) in the NR cohort, 1929 (22%) in the MMR cohort, and 505 (6%) in the SR cohort. Overall, patients were mostly female (76%), mean age was 50 years, and 25% were on a disease-modifying therapy. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) all-cause and MS-related costs among patients with a relapse were higher vs patients without a relapse (all-cause $66,489 [$56,264] vs $41,494 [$48,417]; MS-related $48,700 [$43,364] vs $24,730 [$33,821]). Among patients with a relapse, the mean (SD) all-cause costs were $87,979 [$65,991] vs $60,863 [$51,998] and MS-related costs were $69,586 ($51,187) vs $43,233 [$39,292] for patients in the SR vs MMR cohorts, respectively. A similar trend for increase in cost by relapse severity was observed in the adjusted analysis.

Conclusion

Total annual all-cause and MS-related costs increased with severity of the relapses. High-efficacy treatments might reduce the severity of the relapses, thereby reducing the cost of care in patients with MS.

Real-World Evidence on the Societal Economic Relapse Costs in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Relapses are the hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS). Analyses have shown that the cost of MS increases during periods of relapse. However, results are inconsistent between studies, possibly due to different study designs and the different implications of relapses with respect to patient characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

The aims were to estimate and describe direct and indirect relapse costs and to determine differences in costs with respect to patient characteristics. Furthermore, we describe the pharmacoeconomic impact during the relapse follow-up.

METHODS

Data were extracted from two German, multicenter, observational studies applying a validated resource costs instrument. Relapse costs were calculated as the difference in quarterly costs between propensity score (PS)-matched patients with and without relapses (1:1 ratio). For relapse active patients, we additionally calculated the difference between quarterly costs prior to and during relapse and determined costs in the post-relapse quarter.

RESULTS

Of 1882 patients, 607 (32%) presented at least one relapse. After PS-matching, 597 relapse active and relapse inactive patients were retained. Relapse costs (in 2019 values) ranged between €791 (age 50 + years) and €1910 (disease duration < 5 years). In mildly disabled and recently diagnosed patients, indirect relapse costs (range €1073-€1207) constantly outweighed direct costs (range €591-€703). The increase from prior quarter to relapse quarter was strongest for inpatient stays (+ 366%, €432; p < 0.001), day admissions (+ 228%, €57; p < 0.001), and absenteeism (127%, €463; p < 0.001). In the post-relapse quarter, direct costs and costs of absenteeism remained elevated for patients with relapse-associated worsening.

CONCLUSION

A recent diagnosis and mild disability lead to high relapse costs. The results suggest the necessity to incorporate patient characteristics when assessing relapse costs.

Intranasal Methylprednisolone Effectively Reduces Neuroinflammation in Mice With Experimental Autoimmune Encephalitis

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, the most common form, is characterized by acute neuroinflammatory episodes. In addition to continuous disease-modifying therapy, these relapses require treatment to prevent lesion accumulation and progression of disability. Intravenous methylprednisolone (1-2 g for 3-5 days) is the standard treatment for relapses. However, this treatment is invasive, requires hospitalization, leads to substantial systemic exposure of glucocorticoids, and can only reach modest concentrations in the central nervous system (CNS). Intranasal delivery may represent an alternative to deliver relapse treatment directly to the CNS with higher concentrations and reducing side effects. Histopathological analysis revealed that intranasal administration of methylprednisolone to mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) suppressed the neuroinflammatory peak, and reduced immune cell infiltration and demyelination in the CNS similarly to intravenous administration. Treatment also downregulated Iba1 and GFAP expression. A similar significant reduction of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels in the spinal cord was attained in both intranasal and intravenously treated mice. No damage in the nasal cavity was found after intranasal administration. This study demonstrates that intranasal delivery of methylprednisolone is as efficient as the intravenous route to treat neuroinflammation in EAE.

Marginal Health Care Expenditure Burden Among U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis: 2010-2015

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neuroinflammatory disorder with significant health care burden. However, little is known about health care expenditures since the introduction of oral agents for MS after 2010.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze health care expenditures in individuals with MS using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from 2010-2015.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included adults (≥ 18 years) with MS (Clinical Classification Code 080) and those without MS based on the 2010-2015 full year consolidated MEPS Household Component and Medical Provider Component data files. Descriptive weighted analyses were performed to compare health care expenditures between individuals with MS and without MS. The 2-part model involving probit and generalized linear models was used to estimate the marginal increase in total health care expenditures for MS patients.

RESULTS

There were 0.61 million patients (95% CI = 0.50-0.72) diagnosed with MS annually, accounting for a prevalence of 0.25%. The 2-part model revealed that the marginal total health care expenditures in patients diagnosed with MS were $20,103.49 (95% CI = $14,516.24-$25,690.73) more compared with those without MS. Further, the mean adjusted prescription medication expenditures for the MS group were $13,092.16 (95% CI = $9,452.20-$16,732.12) higher than the non-MS group and accounted for 65.12% of total health care expenditures in MS.

CONCLUSIONS

MS is an expensive neuroinflammatory disease with a majority of the burden attributable to prescription medications. High prescription expenditure burden can be a barrier to optimal patient care in MS.

DISCLOSURES

No funding was received for this study. Hutton reports grants from Adamas, Biogen, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Hoffman-LaRoche, MedImmune, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis and fees from Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, Genentech, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Aparasu reports grants from Novartis, Incyte, and Astellas, outside the submitted work. Earla and Thornton have nothing to disclose. Part of the study findings was presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 2019 National Conference; May 18-22, 2019; New Orleans, LA.

The efficacy and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies. Two authors independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed in RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. In patients with RMS, fingolimod demonstrated a significantly lower annualized relapse rate (0.5 mg/d: mean difference [95% confidence interval] = -0.22 [-0.29 to -0.14]; 1.25 mg/d: -0.26 [-0.36 to -0.16]; 5 mg/d: -0.41 [-0.72 to -0.10]) than placebo. Fingolimod also exhibited a favorable performance on other magnetic resonance imaging outcomes and improved the quality of life in patients. No significant difference was noted in the prevalence of adverse events between the fingolimod treatment group and the placebo/disease-modifying therapy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fingolimod may offer benefits for RMS patients and presents an acceptable safety profile.

Early initiation of fingolimod reduces the rate of severe relapses over the long term: Post hoc analysis from the FREEDOMS, FREEDOMS II, and TRANSFORMS studies

BACKGROUND

Relapse frequency is often correlated with the prognosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). In patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), relapses vary in severity and may affect activities of daily living, require steroid intervention, or hospitalization. Incomplete recovery from relapses results in increasing disability. In pivotal phase III studies of fingolimod (FREEDOMS, FREEDOMS II, and TRANSFORMS), the frequency of overall and severe relapses was significantly reduced in patients with RRMS treated with fingolimod compared with placebo or intramuscular interferon β-1a (IFN β-1a). The objective of this study was to report the effect of early initiation of fingolimod on relapse severity in patients with RRMS.

METHODS

This is a post hoc descriptive analysis of data from the pooled placebo-controlled FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II studies and from the active-comparator TRANSFORMS study. Patients were analyzed under 2 groups: patients initially randomized to receive fingolimod 0.5 mg during the core phase and continued fingolimod 0.5 mg in the extension phase (immediate fingolimod group), and patients initially randomized to placebo or IFN β-1a during the core phase and switched to fingolimod during the extension phase (delayed fingolimod group). Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was estimated for severe relapses (defined as Expanded Disability Status Scale increase of >1 point, or >2-point change in 1 or 2 Functional Systems, respectively, or >1-point change in >4 Functional Systems). ARR was also estimated for relapses that affected activities of daily living, required steroid use, or hospitalization.

RESULTS

In the pooled FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II extensions, the immediate fingolimod group showed sustained reductions in the proportion (core: 15.8% and extension: 9.3%) and in ARR over 4 years (0.032 and 0.015) for severe relapses, in relapses requiring steroids (0.149 and 0.123), hospitalization (0.049 and 0.039) and relapses affecting activities of daily living (0.155 and 0.112). In the TRANSFORMS extension, similar reductions were observed in the immedaite group for the proportion of severe relapses (core: 11.8% and extension: 9.8%). ARR remained low over 2 years for severe relapses (0.024 and 0.018), relapses affecting activities of daily living (0.112 and 0.109), relapses requiring steroids (0.156 and 0.161) and hospitalization (0.027 and 0.033). Results in the FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II and TRANSFORMS extensions for the delayed group were similar. In the TRANSFORMS extension, the proportion of severe relapses were 18.0% (core) and 11.1% (extension); there were significant reductions in ARR for severe relapses (core: 0.079 and extension: 0.029), relapses requiring steroids (0.366 and 0.232), hospitalization (0.092 and 0.055), and relapses affecting activities of daily living (0.285 and 0.144) (all p < 0.0001). Complete recovery was reported for the majority of relapses during the core and extension phases in both the immediate and delayed fingolimod groups (Pooled FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II: immediate group 59.7%-65.5% and delayed group 64.9%-67.7%; TRANSFORMS: 72.1%-80.0% and 65.4%-70.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RRMS, the frequency of severe relapses and relapse severity remained low in the immedaite fingolimod group over a period of 4 years. Reductions in the proportion of severe relapses post switch from IFN β-1a or placebo to fingolimod underscore the clinical benefit and the relevance of an early initiation of fingolimod.

Multiple sclerosis patients who are stable on interferon therapy show better outcomes when staying on same therapy than patients who switch to another interferon

Background

Real-world outcomes from staying on an interferon beta (IFNβ) vs switching to another IFNβ could help guide treatment decisions. This study's objective was to compare outcomes of stable multiple sclerosis (MS) patients on an IFNβ who stayed on therapy vs those who switched to another IFNβ.

Methods

MS patients were identified from the Optum Insights Clinformatics Data Mart Multi-Plan who were 18-64 years old and relapse-free (stable) over 1 year while continuously being treated with an IFNβ. Patients were propensity score matched 3:1 using age, gender, initial IFNβ, adherence, and month and year for patients who stayed on the initial IFNβ (No Switch) to patients who switched to another IFNβ (Switch). Patients had to be continuously enrolled for 1 year prior to and 1 year after the index date (date of the first claim of the switched-to IFNβ or the match date when continuing on initial IFNβ treatment). Patients were enrolled with index dates between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2014. Relapses were recorded during the 1-year follow-up period after index date.

Results

After matching, there were 381 patients in the Switch group and 1,143 in the No Switch group. Baseline characteristics were well matched between groups (average age 46 years, 72% female). The percentage of patients experiencing a relapse during the follow-up was significantly higher in the Switch group than in the No Switch group (21% vs 12%, P<0.0001). Annual relapse rate during the follow-up was significantly higher in the Switch group than in the No Switch group (0.35 vs 0.20, P<0.0001).

Conclusion

MS patients stable on IFNβ therapy who remain on initial therapy had significantly better outcomes (lower annual relapse rate and percentage of patients with relapses) than patients who switched to another IFNβ. This supports the benefits of allowing patients to remain on current IFNβ therapy when stable.

Validation of an algorithm to detect severe MS relapses in administrative health databases

BACKGROUND

Severe relapses that required treatment were important outcomes in the sentinel trials of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Identifying such relapses in administrative data would allow comparative-effectiveness studies of DMTs to be conducted in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

All relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and secondary-progressive (SPMS) patients living in Manitoba between 1999 and 2015 were identified using a validated case definition and linkage to the Manitoba MS Clinic database. All healthcare interactions potentially due to relapses were extracted from population-based administrative (hospital, physician claims and prescription) databases. These "relapse markers" included varying thresholds of outpatient prednisone scripts, day hospital or emergency room (ER) codes for intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone therapy, family physician, neurologist or ER physician billing codes and hospital admissions due to MS. Algorithms using combinations of these markers were compared with a reference standard of neurologist-defined relapses. The most useful algorithms were also examined on a biannual basis over the study period to assess for trends in the sensitivity of relapse detection.

RESULTS

1131 participants with RRMS or SPMS were linked to administrative databases. Analysis of potential relapse markers over the whole 1999-2015 time period was limited by inconsistent coding of same day or ER admissions for IV methylprednisolone administration. Widespread adoption of high-dose oral outpatient prednisone for relapses since 2009 resulted in a progressive improvement in relapse marker sensitivity. The best algorithm consisted of oral prednisone prescriptions >50mg/day for 3-60 days and same day hospital or ER assessment codes with MS as the most responsible diagnosis (sensitivity 70%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 96%, kappa 0.8 in 2013-2015).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe relapses can be identified from administrative datasets with reasonable accuracy. The trend since 2009 toward outpatient relapse treatment will improve the sensitivity of relapse detection with longitudinal follow-up of this cohort and will allow comparison of severe relapse rates between different DMTs, supporting future comparative effectiveness studies.

Cost-effectiveness of oral agents in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis compared to interferon-based therapy in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Promising clinical and humanistic outcomes are associated with the use of new oral agents in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This is the first cost-effectiveness study comparing these medications in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and interferon (IFN)-b1a products (Avonex and Rebif) as first-line therapies in the treatment of patients with RRMS from a Saudi payer perspective.

DESIGN

Cohort Simulation Model (Markov Model).

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A hypothetical cohort of 1000 RRMS Saudi patients was assumed to enter a Markov model model with a time horizon of 20 years and an annual cycle length. The model was developed based on an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the five disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) from a healthcare system perspective. Data on EDSS progression and relapse rates were obtained from the literature; cost data were obtained from King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results were expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefits (NMB) in Saudi Riyals and converted to equivalent $US. The base-case willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was assumed to be $100000 (SAR375000). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to test the robustness of the model.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ICERs and NMB.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis results showed Rebif as the optimal therapy at a WTP threshold of $100000. Avonex had the lowest ICER value of $337282/QALY when compared to Rebif. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were sensitive to utility weights of health state three and four and the cost of Rebif.

CONCLUSION

None of the DMDs were found to be cost-effective in the treatment of RRMS at a WTP threshold of $100000 in this analysis. The DMDs would only be cost-effective at a WTP above $300000.

LIMITATIONS

The current analysis did not reflect the Saudi population preference in valuation of health states and did not consider the societal perspective in terms of cost.

Triaging Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in the Emergency Department: Room for Improvement

Background

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) present to the emergency department (ED) for various reasons. Although true relapse is rarely the underlying culprit, ED visits commonly result in new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neurology admissions. We studied ED visits in patients with MS and evaluated decision making regarding diagnostic/therapeutic interventions and visit outcomes. We identified potential areas for improvement and used the data to propose a triaging algorithm for patients with MS in the ED.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records from 176 ED visits for patients with MS in 2014.

Results

Ninety-seven visits in 75 patients were MS related (66.6% female; mean ± SD age, 52.6 ± 13.8 years; mean ± SD disease duration, 18.5 ± 10.5 years). Thirty-three visits were for new neurologic symptoms (category 1), 29 for worsening preexisting symptoms (category 2), and 35 for MS-related complications (category 3). Eighty-nine visits (91.8%) resulted in hospital admission (42.7% to neurology). Only 39% of ordered MRIs showed radiographic activity. New relapses were determined in 27.8% of the visits and were more prevalent in category 1 compared with category 2 (P = .003); however, the two categories had similar rates of ordered MRIs and neurology admissions.

Conclusions

New relapse is a rare cause of ED visits in MS. Unnecessary MRIs and neurology admissions can be avoided by developing a triaging system for patients with MS based on symptom stratification.

Economics and Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies in the USA

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disabling, chronic disease that imposes a significant economic burden on patients and the US healthcare system. The largest cost component for individuals with MS are prescription drugs, specifically disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Despite an increase in the number and diversity of DMTs over the past 10 years, acquisition costs for all DMTs have escalated dramatically at rates substantially higher than medical inflation. Currently, costs for most DMTs exceed $70,000 a year. Recent cost-effectiveness studies suggest the cost for nearly all DMTs exceeds generally accepted thresholds for what is considered a good value in the USA, even after factoring expected rebates. The high cost of DMTs is symptomatic of systemic dysfunction in the pharmaceutical market. Strategies aimed at reigning in high-cost medications include proposals ranging from increasing pricing transparency to allowing Medicare to negotiate directly with manufacturers. Because the economics of pharmaceuticals are inherently complex, a diversity of approaches will be required.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ocrelizumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis

AIM

To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare ocrelizumab vs subcutaneous (SC) interferon beta-1a for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).

METHODS

A Markov cohort model with a 20-year horizon was developed to compare ocrelizumab with SC interferon beta-1a from a US payer perspective. A cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 0-6, who initiated treatment with ocrelizumab or SC interferon beta-1a, were entered into the model. The model considered 21 health states: EDSS 0-9 in RRMS, EDSS 0-9 in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), and death. Patients with RRMS could transition across EDSS scores, progress to SPMS, experience relapses, or die. Transition probabilities within RRMS while patients received ocrelizumab or SC interferon beta-1a were based on data from the two SC interferon beta-1a-controlled Phase III OPERA I and OPERA II trials of ocrelizumab in RMS. Transitions within RRMS when off-treatment, RRMS-to-SPMS transitions, transitions within SPMS, and transitions to death were based on the literature. Utilities of health states, disutilities of relapses, costs of therapies, and medical costs associated with health states, relapse, and adverse events were from the literature and publicly available data sources. The model estimated per-patient total costs, incremental cost per life year (LY) gained, and incremental cost per quality-adjusted LY (QALY) gained. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model results.

RESULTS

Ocrelizumab was associated with a cost savings of $63,822 and longer LYs (Δ = 0.046) and QALYs (Δ = 0.556) over a 20-year time horizon. The results of the model were robust in the DSA and PSA.

LIMITATIONS

The model did not consider subsequent treatments and their impact on disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that ocrelizumab is more cost-effective than SC interferon beta-1a for the treatment of RMS.

Glucocorticoid-associated blood glucose response and MS relapse recovery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between MS relapse recovery and blood glucose (BG) response to IV methylprednisolone (IVMP) treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 36 patients with MS admitted for IVMP treatment of acute relapse who had adequate data to characterize BG response, relapse severity, and recovery. The relationship between glucocorticoid-associated nonfasting BG (NFBG) and relapse recovery was assessed.

RESULTS

Highest recorded nonfasting BG (maximum NFBG [maxNFBG]) values were significantly higher in patients with MS without relapse recovery compared with those with recovery (271 ± 68 vs 209 ± 48 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.0045). After adjusting for relapse severity, MS patients with maxNFBG below the group median were 6 times (OR = 6.01; 95% CI, 1.08-33.40; p = 0.040) more likely to experience relapse recovery than those with maxNFBG above the group median. In a multiple regression model adjusting for age, sex, and relapse severity, a 1-mg/dL increase in the maxNFBG was associated with 4.5% decrease in the probability of recovery (OR = 0.955; 95% CI, 0.928-0.983; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that higher glucocorticoid-associated NFBG values in acutely relapsing patients with MS are associated with diminished probability of recovery. This relationship could reflect steroid-associated hyperglycemia and/or insulin resistance, defects in non-steroid-associated (e.g., prerelapse) glucose metabolism, or both. This study included only those admitted for an MS relapse, and it is this subset of patients for whom these findings may be most relevant. A prospective study to evaluate glucose regulation and MS relapse recovery in a broader outpatient MS population is under way.

Multiple sclerosis: Frequency, cost, and economic burden in the United States

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common neurological diseases, affecting young and middle-aged adults. The full economic cost of managing chronic MS is substantial. To investigate the recent trend of medical cost and economic burden of MS management in the United States (U.S.), we inquired for available data from the National Inpatient Sample database (NIS; from 1994 to 2013). The annual rates of changes were determined by linear regression analysis. We found an estimated half million increase in MS admissions, annually, which was projected to exceed 43.5 million by the end of year 2017. We also found the charge and the costs associated with MS care increased at rates of US$ 40 million a year and US$ 8 million a year, respectively. We revealed a 1.6 fold increase in the inflation of medical bill in the past decade, and the inflation of medical bills was inversely correlated to the cost-to-charge ratios. In sum, we outline the national trends of medical care use and the expenditure of caring for patients with MS. Periodic reviews and characterizations of expenditure trends are critical for formulating future policy.

Neurotherapeutic Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common disabling neurologic disease of young adults. There are now 16 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved disease-modifying therapies for MS as well as a cohort of other agents commonly used in practice when conventional therapies prove inadequate. This article discusses approved FDA therapies as well as commonly used practice-based therapies for MS, as well as those therapies that can be used in patients attempting to become pregnant, or in patients with an established pregnancy, who require concomitant treatment secondary to recalcitrant disease activity.

Multiple sclerosis: relapses, resource use, and costs

BACKGROUND

Relapses can have a major impact on the lives of people with multiple sclerosis (MS), and yet relapse-related healthcare costs have received little attention. This has limited cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for MS and hampered decision-making regarding the funding of MS healthcare services.

OBJECTIVE

To describe health/social care resource use and costs according to the frequency, severity, and endurance of MS relapses.

METHODS

Data from the prospective, longitudinal UK South West Impact of Multiple Sclerosis cohort were used. A total of 11,800 questionnaires from 1441 people with MS were available, including data on relapses, contacts with health/social care professionals, and other MS-related resource use.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) 6-monthly MS-related health/social care cost for individuals who reported a relapse was £519 (£949), compared to £229 (£366) for those who had not did report a relapse. Care costs varied widely dependent on the characteristics of the relapse. The mean (SD) cost when a relapse was not treated with steroids was £381 (£780), whilst the equivalent cost was £3579 (£1727) when a relapse resulted in hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of relapses on health and social care resources and costs differs according to their frequency, length, and severity. The data provided here can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses and to inform decision-making regarding healthcare provision for people with this condition.

Determinants of high cost in multiple sclerosis patients: a claims and chart review study

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with high cost multiple sclerosis (MS) patients using integrated administrative claims and medical charts data.

METHODS

This study identified newly diagnosed MS patients (≥18 years) in a large United States managed care claims database between 1 January 2007 and 30 April 2011 using the ICD-9-CM code (340.xx). Mean annualized MS-related costs higher than the third quartile were categorized as high cost, lower than the first quartile as low, and the rest as medium. Patients were compared across cohorts with descriptive and inferential statistics. Baseline high cost factors were identified with multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Administrative claims (n = 4342) and medical chart records (n = 400) data was evaluated. Mean (SD) annualized MS-related costs were $6313 ($14,177) for patients overall and $18,398 ($24,483) for high cost patients. Inpatient costs accounted for the largest proportion (49.69%) of MS-related costs among high cost patients. MS relapses and MS-related comorbidities were more prevalent in the high cost patients. In the multivariable analyses, patients with baseline use of antidepressants or corticosteroids, baseline muscle weakness, and initial treatment from a non-neurologist were likelier to be high cost MS patients.

LIMITATIONS

MS-related clinical information was not completely available from medical chart data. The specificity of true MS-related costs may have been limited and the definition of the cost-based cohort segmentations was arbitrary.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, baseline use of MS-related medications, the presence of baseline MS-related comorbidities, MS relapses, and MS-related hospitalizations were significantly associated with high cost patients. Future comparative effectiveness studies of currently approved disease modifying therapies for MS may help to identify best strategies for individual patients to minimize clinical events that are associated with high disease related costs.

Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder with large annual costs. This study evaluated utilization and costs for the management of MS relapses with H.P. Acthar^® Gel (repository corticotropin injection; Acthar; Mallinckrodt) compared to receipt of plasmapheresis (PMP) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) among patients with MS who experienced multiple relapses.

Methods

We identified patients with MS diagnoses who had relapses treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), the first-line treatment for MS relapse. Patients who were treated for the subsequent relapses were eligible for the study. We analyzed 12- and 24-month healthcare utilization and costs among patients who received Acthar prescriptions compared to patients who were treated with PMP/IVIG using generalized linear and logistic regression models to calculate unadjusted and adjusted means and 95% confidence intervals.

Results

For the 12-month analysis, a total of 213 patients received Acthar prescriptions and 226 were treated with PMP or IVIG. Patients who received Acthar prescriptions were similar to those who received other treatments in terms of most demographic variables. Acthar recipients had fewer hospitalizations (0.2 vs. 0.4; P = 0.01) and received fewer outpatient services (29 vs. 43; P < 0.0001) but received more prescription medications (36 vs. 30; P < 0.0001) compared to recipients of PMP/IVIG. Patients who received Acthar prescriptions had lower inpatient and outpatient costs ($15,000 lower; P = 0.001; and $54,000 lower; P < 0.0001, respectively) but similar total costs. Similar results were seen in the cohort with 24 months of outcome data.

Conclusion

Acthar may be a useful treatment option compared to PMP/IVIG for patients with MS experiencing multiple relapses.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant to the University of Washington from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0363-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Quantifying the relationship between increased disability and health care resource utilization, quality of life, work productivity, health care costs in patients with multiple sclerosis in the US

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive condition affecting the central nervous system. Progression of MS results in increased level of disability and most patients will eventually experience some degree of functional impairment and impaired mobility. Costs and burdens escalate as MS disability increases. However, there is a lack of recent data on the impact of MS disability on the cost and burden among patients in the US.

METHODS

Data for this study were drawn from a real world, cross-sectional survey undertaken between 2013 and 2014. Neurologists completed detailed patient report forms (PRF) for the most recent consulting patients with MS (age >18 years). Patient's perceptions of their diagnosis and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected through a patient self-completion questionnaire (PSC). Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between disability (determined by latest Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score) and current relapse and health care resource utilization, health care costs, HRQoL and work productivity.

RESULTS

PRF data were collected for 715 patients (335 also completed a PSC). Patients with higher disability scores (EDSS 3-5 and >5 vs <3 points) and current relapse (vs no current relapse) reported significantly greater health resource utilization for physician visits (p < 0.05) and hospitalizations (p < 0.05) in the preceding 12 months. In addition, they had poorer HRQoL (p < 0.05), were significantly more likely to be unemployed (p < 0.05) and to have had to stop working due to MS (p < 0.05). They also incurred significantly higher health care related costs, including costs for physician consultations, hospitalizations and therapy (p < 0.05). The total costs of care were $51,825, $57,889 and $67,116 for EDSS < 3, EDSS 3-5 and EDSS > 5 groups, respectively; $51,692 and $58,648 for non-relapse and relapse groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For MS patients in the US, health resource utilization and healthcare care costs increase with progression of disability. As the disability worsens, patients also exhibit diminished HRQoL and lower work productivity. There is a need for treatments that slow down or delay disability progression among MS patients.

Comparative efficacy of disease-modifying therapies for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Randomised studies have demonstrated efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However it is unclear how the magnitude of treatment efficacy varies across all currently available therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of available therapies in reducing relapses and disability progression in RRMS.

METHODS

A systematic review identified 28 randomised, placebo-controlled and direct comparative trials. A network meta-analysis was conducted within a Bayesian framework to estimate comparative annualised relapse rates (ARR) and risks of disability progression (defined by both a 3-month, and 6-month confirmation interval). Potential sources of treatment-effect modification from study-level covariates and baseline risk were evaluated through meta-regression methods. The Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking curve (SUCRA) method was used to provide a ranking of treatments for each outcome.

RESULTS

The magnitude of ARR reduction varied between 15-36% for all interferon-beta products, glatiramer acetate and teriflunomide, and from 50 to 69% for alemtuzumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod and natalizumab. The risk of disability progression (3-month) was reduced by 19-28% with interferon-beta products, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod and teriflunomide, by 38-45% for pegylated interferon-beta, dimethyl fumarate and natalizumab and by 68% with alemtuzumab. Broadly similar estimates for the risk of disability progression (6-month), with the exception of interferon-beta-1b 250mcg which was much more efficacious based on this definition. Alemtuzumab and natalizumab had the highest SUCRA scores (97% and 95% respectively) for ARR, while ranking for disability progression varied depending on the definition of the outcome. Interferon-beta-1b 250mcg ranked among the most efficacious treatments for disability progression confirmed after six months (92%) and among the least efficacious when the outcome was confirmed after three months (30%). No significant modification of relative treatment effects was identified from study-level covariates or baseline risk.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo, clear reductions in ARR with disease-modifying therapies were accompanied by more uncertain changes in disability progression. The magnitude of the reduction and the uncertainty associated with treatment effects varied between DMTs. While natalizumab and alemtuzumab demonstrated consistently high ranking across outcomes, with older interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate products ranking lowest, variation in disability progression definitions lead to variation in the relative ranking of treatments. Rigorously conducted comparative studies are required to fully evaluate the comparative treatment effects of disease modifying therapies for RRMS.

Cost-effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF, also known as gastro-resistant DMF), an effective therapy for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), compared with glatiramer acetate and fingolimod, commonly used treatments in the US.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed comparing delayed-release DMF to glatiramer acetate and fingolimod using a US payer perspective and 20-year time horizon. A cohort of patients, mean age 38 years, with relapsing-remitting MS and Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores between 0-6 entered the model. Efficacy and safety were estimated by mixed-treatment comparison of data from the DEFINE and CONFIRM trials and clinical trials of other disease-modifying therapies. Data from published studies were used to derive resource use, cost, and utility inputs. Key outcomes included costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Alternative scenarios tested in a sensitivity analysis included drug efficacy, EDSS-related or relapse-related costs, alternative perspectives, drug acquisition costs, and utility.

RESULTS

Base-case results with a 20-year time horizon indicated that delayed-release DMF increased QALYs +0.450 or +0.359 compared with glatiramer acetate or fingolimod, respectively. Reductions in 20-year costs with delayed-release DMF were -$70,644 compared with once-daily glatiramer acetate and -$32,958 compared with fingolimod. In an analysis comparing delayed-release DMF to three-times-weekly glatiramer acetate and assuming similar efficacy and safety to the once-daily formulation, 20-year costs with delayed-release DMF were increased by $15,806 and cost per QALY gained was $35,142. The differences in costs were most sensitive to acquisition cost and inclusion of informal care costs and productivity losses. The differences in QALYs were most sensitive to the impact of delayed-release DMF on disease progression and the EDSS utility weights.

CONCLUSION

Delayed-release DMF is likely to increase QALYs for patients with relapsing forms of MS and be cost-effective compared with fingolimod and glatiramer acetate.

Relapses Requiring Intravenous Steroid Use and Multiple-Sclerosis-related Hospitalizations: Integrated Analysis of the Delayed-release Dimethyl Fumarate Phase III Studies

PURPOSE

The purpose was to report the effects of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) on the number of relapses requiring intravenous (IV) steroids and multiple sclerosis (MS)-related hospitalizations using integrated data from the Phase III DEFINE and CONFIRM studies.

METHODS

DEFINE and CONFIRM were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DMF over a 2-year period in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive oral DMF 240 mg BID or TID, placebo, or glatiramer acetate (CONFIRM only). Eligible subjects (aged 18-55 years) had an EDSS score of 0-5.0 and experienced either ≥1 relapse in the 12 months or had ≥1 gadolinium-enhanced lesion on brain MRI in the 6 weeks, before randomization. Data DEFINE and CONFIRM were pooled and analyzed using a negative binomial regression model (adjusted for study and region). Data obtained after subjects switched to an alternative MS therapy were not included in the analysis. Only relapses confirmed by the Independent Neurology Evaluation Committee were included in the analysis of relapses requiring IV steroids.

FINDINGS

The study population (intention-to-treat) comprised 2301 patients who received either placebo (n = 771), DMF BID (n = 769), or DMF TID (n = 761). Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were generally well balanced among treatment groups. Throughout the 2-year studies, the total number of relapses treated with methylprednisolone was 402, 221, and 209 in the placebo, DMF BID, and DMF TID groups, respectively. A smaller proportion of patients in the DMF BID (168 of 769 [21.8%]) and DMF TID (151 of 761 [19.8%]) groups experienced ≥1 relapse requiring IV steroids compared with the placebo group (284 of 771 [36.8%]). The total number of MS-related hospitalizations over 2 years was 136, 94, and 74 in the placebo, DMF BID, and DMF TID groups. A smaller proportion of patients in the DMF BID (73 of 769 [9.5%]) and DMF TID (57 of 761 [7.5%]) groups had ≥1 MS-related hospitalization compared with the placebo group (104 of 771 [13.5%]).

IMPLICATIONS

DMF is an effective and well tolerated therapy for RRMS. In addition to clinical benefits, the use of DMF may be associated with reduced patient burden and health economic savings, resulting from a decrease in resource utilization associated with relapses. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00420212 and NCT00451451.

Patient preferences for attributes of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: development and results of a ratings-based conjoint analysis

BACKGROUND

Timely individualized treatment is essential to improving relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patient health outcomes, yet little is known about how patients make treatment decisions. We sought to evaluate RRMS patient preferences for risks and benefits of treatment.

METHODS

Fifty patients with RRMS completed conjoint analysis surveys with 16 hypothetical disease-modifying therapy (DMT) medication profiles developed using a fractional factorial design. Medication profiles were assigned preference ratings from 0 (not acceptable) to 10 (most favorable). Medication attributes included a range of benefits, adverse effects, administration routes, and market durations. Analytical models used linear mixed-effects regression.

RESULTS

Participants showed the highest preference for medication profiles that would improve their symptoms (β = 0.81-1.03, P < .001), not a proven DMT outcome. Preventing relapses, the main clinical trial outcome, was not associated with significant preferences (P = .35). Each year of preventing magnetic resonance imaging changes and disease symptom progression showed DMT preferences of 0.17 point (β = 0.17, P = .002) and 0.12 point (β = 0.12, P < .001), respectively. Daily oral administration was preferred over all parenteral routes (P < .001). A 1% increase in death or severe disability decreased relative DMT preference by 1.15 points (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient preference focused on symptoms and prevention of progression but not on relapse prevention, the proven drug outcome. Patients were willing to accept some level of serious risk for certain types and amounts of benefits, and they strongly preferred daily oral administration over all other options.

Cost-effectiveness of natalizumab vs fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: analyses in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of natalizumab vs fingolimod over 2 years in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients and patients with rapidly evolving severe disease in Sweden.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was developed to estimate the incremental cost per relapse avoided of natalizumab and fingolimod from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system. Modeled 2-year costs in Swedish kronor of treating RRMS patients included drug acquisition costs, administration and monitoring costs, and costs of treating MS relapses. Effectiveness was measured in terms of MS relapses avoided using data from the AFFIRM and FREEDOMS trials for all patients with RRMS and from post-hoc sub-group analyses for patients with rapidly evolving severe disease. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty.

RESULTS

The analysis showed that, in all patients with MS, treatment with fingolimod costs less (440,463 Kr vs 444,324 Kr), but treatment with natalizumab results in more relapses avoided (0.74 vs 0.59), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 25,448 Kr per relapse avoided. In patients with rapidly evolving severe disease, natalizumab dominated fingolimod. Results of the sensitivity analysis demonstrate the robustness of the model results. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 500,000 Kr per relapse avoided, natalizumab is cost-effective in >80% of simulations in both patient populations.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include absence of data from direct head-to-head studies comparing natalizumab and fingolimod, use of relapse rate reduction rather than sustained disability progression as the primary model outcome, assumption of 100% adherence to MS treatment, and exclusion of adverse event costs in the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Natalizumab remains a cost-effective treatment option for patients with MS in Sweden. In the RRMS patient population, the incremental cost per relapse avoided is well below a 500,000 Kr WTP threshold per relapse avoided. In the rapidly evolving severe disease patient population, natalizumab dominates fingolimod.

Increased relapse activity for multiple sclerosis natalizumab users who become nonpersistent: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab disease-modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is efficacious in randomized controlled trials. Few studies have estimated the association between real-world natalizumab persistence behavior and relapse-related outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) examine the impact of using natalizumab consistently (i.e., persistent) on relapse-related outcomes as compared with transitioning to inconsistent natalizumab use (i.e., nonpersistent) and (b) examine the impact of other treatment patterns on relapse-related outcomes for those who initiated natalizumab.

METHODS

Using the IMS PharMetrics Plus claims database (years 2006-2012), we identified MS subjects who initiated natalizumab (no natalizumab claims in year prior) and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Persistence in annual follow-up periods was defined as no 90-day or greater gap in natalizumab therapy. Relapse was an MS-related hospitalization or outpatient visit with intravenous or oral steroid burst claim within 7 days. Analyses compared observations based on changes in natalizumab persistence and natalizumab nonpersistence status from 1 year to the next (e.g., transitioning from persistent to nonpersistent), estimating differences in mean annual relapses and mean annual relapse-related costs.

RESULTS

A total of 2,407 natalizumab initiators had at least 2 years of follow-up, yielding 4,770 year-to-year natalizumab treatment patterns where each subject contributed 1, 2, or 3 year-to-year treatment patterns. In the year prior, 3,187 treatment patterns were persistent; 731 (22.9%) of these transitioned to nonpersistence. The remaining 1,583 treatment patterns were nonpersistent in the year prior; 132 (8.3%) of these transitioned to persistence. Persistent to nonpersistent treatment patterns were associated with a mean relapse-rate increase of 0.23 (95% CI = 0.12, 0.35), and a mean increase in relapse-related costs of $1,346 (95% CI = $97, $2,595). Nonpersistent to persistent treatment patterns were associated with a mean relapse-rate decrease of -0.15 (95% CI = -0.32, 0.017) and a mean decrease in relapse-related costs of -$1,369 (95% CI = -$2,761, $23).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that real-world persistent natalizumab users who become nonpersistent have statistically significant increases in annual relapses and relapse-related costs. Those who transition from nonpersistent to persistent have nonsignificant reductions in relapses and their associated costs.

The effect of age and sex on cost of inpatient facility encounters among patients with multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of age and sex on cost of all-cause and multiple sclerosis (MS)-related inpatient facility encounters.

METHODS

Adult patients with an initial MS diagnosis were identified from a national managed-care database (IMS LifeLink Health Plans Database). The analysis included newly diagnosed MS patients with 12 months insurance eligibility before and after their first MS diagnosis. Inpatient facility encounters (stays) were analyzed for all-cause and MS-related events (ICD-9-CM = 340.XX), other demyelinating CNS disease (ICD-9-CM = 341.XX), rehabilitation (ICD-9-CM = V57.89), and a group of symptom-related diagnoses. Costs and length of stay were evaluated using a general linear model controlling for age and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 57,236 patients met study criteria; 74.3% were female. Mean age for females was 45.5 years and for males it was 47.5 years. In total, 17.0% had an all-cause inpatient stay in the 360-day post index, and 3.2% had an in patient stay with a MS relapse-related diagnosis as primary discharge diagnosis. Additional MS-related diagnoses that led to inpatient stays included other demyelinating CNS disease (0.3%), symptom-related diagnoses (1.0%), and rehabilitation (1.1%). All-cause inpatient cost was higher for males vs females across all age groups; however, cost for females increased at a greater rate as age increased (p = 0.0007). Symptom-related inpatient cost was flat for males, was lower for females than males at an average age of 30, and was greater for females than males at an average age of 60 (p = 0.0199). Cost for MS inpatient stays ($11,931), other demyelinating CNS-related stays ($14,931), and rehabilitation ($23,643) did not differ by age and sex. The average cost for any MS-related relapse inpatient stay was $13,761 and varied with increasing age (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Burden of illness for relapse among MS patients is substantial. Costs vary by age and sex depending on the discharge diagnosis. Inclusion of symptom-related and rehabilitation inpatient stays may account for an under-recognized proportion of total expenditures.

Cost effectiveness analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and degenerative neurological disease characterized by loss of myelin sheath of some neurons in brain and spinal cord. It is associated with high economic burden due to premature deaths and high occurrence of disabilities. The aim of the current study was to determine cost effectiveness of two major products of interferon 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Altogether, 140 patients who have consumed Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS for at least two years were randomly selected (70 patients in each group). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the adopted MSQoL-54 instrument. Costs were measured and valued from Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) perspective. Two-way sensitivity analysis was used to check robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Patients in CinnoVex group reported significantly higher scores in both physical (69.5 vs. 50.9, P<0.001) and mental (63.3 vs. 56.6, P=0.03) aspects of HRQoL than Avonex group. On the other hand, annual cost of CinnoVex and Avonex were 2410 US$ and 4515US$ per patient, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that CinnoVex was dominant option over the study period. It is suggested that results of the current study should be considered in allocating resources to MS treatments in Iran. Of course, our findings should be interpreted with caution duo to short term horizon and lack of HRQoL scores at baseline (before the intervention).

Rehabilitation interventions for the management of multiple sclerosis relapse: a short scoping review

BACKGROUND

This review was undertaken to identify and summarize the existing evidence regarding postrelapse rehabilitation interventions in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted within the following databases: CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE via Ovid, and PsycINFO via CSA Illumina. The following terms were searched as subject headings or keywords: choice behavior, counseling, decision making, disease management, health education, health promotion, patient education, patient participation, patient satisfaction, psychotherapy, rehabilitation, self-care, self-management. Then these searches were combined with the subject headings for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and subject heading or keywords for recurrence/relapse. Through the initial database search and additional citation search, 260 potentially relevant citations were identified. After screening the titles and abstracts as well as the citation search results, the reviewers agreed to keep five studies for the full-text reviews. Three rehabilitation intervention studies were included in the final review.

RESULTS

A combined total of 145 adults who experienced a relapse within the previous 5 months received 3 to 18 days of rehabilitation. All three studies suggested the benefit of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for individuals with MS to improve impairment or disability.

CONCLUSIONS

The three multidisciplinary rehabilitation interventions included in this review appear to be effective in improving impairment or disability of people with MS who experienced a relapse. Given the limited number of studies and their methodological limitations, the results must be interpreted cautiously. Further investigation is needed to better understand the rehabilitation needs of people with MS after relapse in order to improve research and care.

Emergency medical care of multiple sclerosis patients: primary data from the mount sinai resource utilization in multiple sclerosis project

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There has been no systematic analysis of emergency department (ED) utilization in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population. We investigated the acute-care needs of MS patients using ED as a route for entry into healthcare services.

METHODS

ED visits made by MS patients were identified. Data extracted included demographics, medical/neurological history, and workup/management in the ED.

RESULTS

The Mount Sinai ED received 569 visits from 224 MS patients during a 3-year period, of whom 33.5% were covered by Medicaid and 12.9% were uninsured. Patients with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≥6 accounted for 54%, 50.5% of relapsing remitting MS patients were being treated with disease-modifying therapies, and 74.5% of the ED visits were non-neurological. Patients with mild-to-moderate MS were more likely to present to the ED for issues directly related to MS such as acute exacerbations, while those with severe MS presented more often due to medical issues indirectly related to MS, such as urinary tract infections (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most MS patients seeking ED care suffer from acute non-neurological problems. The MS patients presenting to the ED tended to be underinsured, had high levels of disability, and were undertreated with disease-modifying therapies. The acute-care needs of MS patients evolve over the disease course, as do the resources that must be utilized in providing emergency care across the spectrum of MS severity. Understanding the characteristics, problems, and needs of MS patients utilizing the ED is an important step in improving care in this population from both clinical and public health perspectives.

Teriflunomide reduces relapses with sequelae and relapses leading to hospitalizations: results from the TOWER study

Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. This post hoc analysis of the Phase III TOWER study evaluated the effects of teriflunomide treatment on five severe relapse outcomes: relapses with sequelae defined by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)/functional system (FS) score (sequelae-EDSS/FS) 30 days post relapse; relapses with sequelae defined by the investigator (sequelae-investigator); relapses leading to hospitalization; relapses treated with intravenous corticosteroids; and intense relapses using the definition of Panitch et al. from the EVIDENCE study based on specified increases in EDSS for severe relapses. Adjusted annualized rates for the five severe relapse outcomes were derived using a Poisson model with robust error variance, with treatment, baseline EDSS strata and region as covariates. Compared with placebo, teriflunomide significantly reduced annualized rates of relapses with sequelae-EDSS/FS [14 mg, 36.6 % (p = 0.0021); 7 mg, 31.3 % (p = 0.0104)] and sequelae-investigator [14 mg only, 53.5 % (p = 0.0004)], relapses leading to hospitalization [14 mg only, 33.6 % (p = 0.0155)], relapses requiring intravenous corticosteroids [14 mg, 35.7 % (p = 0.0002); 7 mg, 21.5 % (p = 0.0337)], and intense relapses [14 mg only, 52.5 % (p = 0.0015)]. Patients treated with teriflunomide 14 mg spent significantly fewer nights in hospital for relapse (p = 0.009) and had lower annualized rates of all hospitalizations (p = 0.030). Taken together, the positive effects of teriflunomide on severe relapses indicate that teriflunomide may reduce relapse-related healthcare costs.

Cost-effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, based on the CombiRx study

BACKGROUND

To assess the cost-effectiveness of the Disease Modifying Treatments (DMT), Glatiramer Acetate (GA) and Interferon beta-1a (IFN) in monotherapy alone and in combination for the prevention of relapses among Spanish patients aged between 18-60 years old with established Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to represent the transition of a cohort of patients over a 10 year period using the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service (NHS). The model considered five different health states with 1-year cycles including without relapse, patients with suspect, non-protocol defined and protocol defined exacerbations, as well as a category information lost. Efficacy data was obtained from the 3-year CombiRx Study. Costs were reported in 2013 Euros and a 3% discount rate was applied for health and benefits. Deterministic results were presented as the annual treatment cost for the number of relapses. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

Deterministic results showed that the expected annual cost per patient was lower when treated with GA (€13,843) compared with IFN (€15,589) and the combined treatment with IFN+GA (€21,539). The annual number of relapses were lower in the GA cohort with 3.81 vs 4.18 in the IFN cohort and 4.08 in the cohort treated with IFN+GA. Results from probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that GA has a higher probability of being cost-effective than treatment with IFN or IFN+GA for threshold values from €28,000 onwards, independent of the maximum that the Spanish NHS is willing to pay for avoiding relapses.

CONCLUSION

GA was shown to be a cost-effective treatment option for the prevention of relapses in Spanish patients diagnosed with RRMS. When GA in monotherapy is compared with INF in monotherapy and IFN+GA combined, it may be concluded that the first is the dominant strategy.

A comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for multiple sclerosis

The purpose of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of four disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS): glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone), interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) intramuscular (IM) injection (Avonex), IFNβ-1a subcutaneous (SC) injection (Rebif), and interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) SC injection (Betaseron). Cost-effectiveness analyses are useful in countering the financial uncertainties and treatment efficacy concerns faced by people with MS. We conducted simulation analyses of the principal findings of a 2009 study by Goldberg et al. (Goldberg LD, Edwards NC, Fincher C, et al: Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;15:543-555) to frame the researchers' findings from the perspectives of cost-conscious and cost-neutral MS patients. We found that for the cost-conscious consumer, the ranking of most (1) to least (4) preferred DMDs was 1) IFNβ -1a IM (Avonex), 2) GA (Copaxone), 3) IFNβ-1a SC (Rebif), and 4) IFNβ-1b SC (Beta-seron). For the cost-neutral consumer who places priority on effectiveness over costs, the ranking was 1) IFNβ-1a SC (Rebif), 2) IFNβ-1b SC (Betaseron), 3) GA (Copaxone), and 4) IFNβ-1a IM (Avonex). Future studies could examine cost-effectiveness over extended periods of time (eg, 15-20 years) and more closely examine the cost-effectiveness of natalizumab (Tysabri) relative to the four primary DMDs.

Treatment adherence and other patient-reported outcomes as cost determinants in multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Treatment adherence is one of the key factors for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. In order to assess costs related to adherence to, and persistence and compliance with, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), a narrative review of the literature was performed. Satisfaction with and preference for DMTs and their delivery devices were also assessed, as both can have an influence on patients' adherence and persistence.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, congress proceedings) were searched to identify publications analyzing MS costs related to adherence, persistence, satisfaction, and preferences for MS treatments. Bibliographic references were hand searched. English or Spanish studies published between January 2007 and January 2013 were selected.

RESULTS

A total of 398 titles were identified, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria. Six studies evaluated the impact of adherence, persistence, and compliance on treatment costs; four publications analyzed satisfaction with DMTs; and two assessed treatment preferences based on attributes of the delivery device. Increased adherence and persistence were associated with better clinical outcomes, leading to lower relapse risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.85) and a decrease in health care resource use, such as MS-related hospitalizations (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.83) and emergency department visits (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.60-1.07). This reduction in resource use led to a patient/year total cost reduction (excluding DMT costs) of up to 22%.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the importance of ensuring adequate adherence in MS patients through treatments and devices better tailored to patients' needs that could enhance clinical outcomes and reduce MS costs. Understanding the factors underlying satisfaction and compliance with treatment and patients' preference for certain therapies could help in the development of strategies that can improve adherence.

Health care-resource utilization before and after natalizumab initiation in multiple sclerosis patients in the US

Objectives

To evaluate multiple sclerosis (MS)-related health care-resource utilization and costs prior to and after initiating natalizumab in the US.

Materials and methods

A retrospective administrative claims analysis was conducted using the Truven Health MarketScan Databases to identify adults diagnosed with MS who initiated natalizumab (index date) between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2010. Patients had ≥24 months of continuous enrollment (12 months before [preperiod] and 12 months after [postperiod] the index date) and remained on natalizumab for the 12-month postperiod. Patients with and without other disease-modifying treatment (DMT) during the preperiod were examined. Patient characteristics, MS-related inpatient stays, and corticosteroid use were compared in the pre- and postperiods using paired statistical tests, where appropriate.

Results

The study comprised 1,458 patients, mean age 45.2 years (standard deviation 10.5), 74.2% female. The majority (70.3%) used a DMT during the preperiod. After initiating natalizumab, there was a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with MS-related inpatient stays (7.6% versus 2.4%, P<0.001), MS-related inpatient costs (median US $12,078 versus US $9,784, P<0.001), and length of stay (7.12 days versus 6.26 days, P=0.005). Both cohorts showed a reduction in the percentage of patients with MS-related inpatient stays and costs with greater reductions for patients without DMTs in the preperiod (−6.2% [P<0.001] and −US $1,496 [P=0.056], respectively) compared to those with a DMT in the preperiod (−4.8% and −US $1,262, respectively, P<0.001 for both). Compared to the preperiod, there were significant reductions in intravenous and oral corticosteroid use for natalizumab initiators (−60.1% and −52.9%, respectively, P<0.001 for both). These utilization reductions correspond to mean corticosteroid cost-per-patient reductions of −US $101 across all natalizumab users (P<0.001).

Conclusion

The initiation of natalizumab was associated with significant decreases in MS-related inpatient stays, and corticosteroid use with corresponding decreases in length of stay and costs among natalizumab users with and without DMTs in the prior year.

Emergency Department visits before the diagnosis of MS

IMPORTANCE

Prompt diagnosis and early initiation of disease-modifying treatment improves long-term outcomes in MS patients. This study looks at the path to MS diagnosis from the Emergency Department (ED), a frequent point of access for healthcare.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how patients presenting to the Mount Sinai ED with initial manifestations of MS are ultimately diagnosed with demyelinating disease.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational analysis of all patients diagnosed with MS from 2005 to 2009. Part of the Resource Utilization in MS (RESUMS) Study.

SETTING

Urban, tertiary care center Emergency Department

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-nine patients were diagnosed with MS during the study period and made a total of 98 ED visits prior to that diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included percentage of ED visits for neurologic symptoms, percentage that were likely initial manifestations of MS, percentage of visits admitted, mean length of hospital stay of those patients admitted, time until MS diagnosis, and time until initiation of disease modifying agent. Demographic and presentation-specific features correlating with time until MS diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

69.4% of patients were female. Mean age was 32.9 years (range 16-56). Hispanics comprised 40.8%, African Americans 28.6%, and Caucasians 18.2%. 59.2% of patients had private insurance, 26.5% Medicaid, and 6.1% Medicare. 50% of ED visits (49) were for neurologic symptoms (sensory symptoms 44.9%, vision changes 26.5%, weakness 24.5%, imbalance 16%, diplopia and vertigo 10.2%). 75.5% of the ED visits for neurologic symptoms were admitted; mean length of stay was 5.7 days (range 1-18). MS or demyelinating disease was diagnosed at the time of the ED visit or admission in 30/49 (61.2%) of neurologic presentations, with 73.5% diagnosed within a week. In the remaining 26.6%, MS diagnosis was delayed. 18.4% were diagnosed within a year of their neurologic ED visit and 8.2% remained undiagnosed at 1 year. Disease modifying agents were started in 71.4% of patients, 77.1% within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

ED presentations for acute neurologic symptoms are an important opportunity to diagnose and treat early MS, and while the majority of the patients studied were appropriately triaged, diagnosed and treated in a timely manner, there exists room for improvement.

A randomized clinical trial of oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone for relapse of MS

Background:

Steroids improve multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses but therapeutic window and dose, frequency and administration route remain uncertain.

Objective:

The objective of this paper is to compare the clinical and radiologic efficacy, tolerability and safety of intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP) vs oral methylprednisolone (oMP), at equivalent high doses, for MS relapse.

Methods:

Forty-nine patients with moderate or severe relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a double-blind, noninferiority, multicenter trial to receive ivMP or oMP and their matching placebos. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were determined at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12. Brain MRI were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 4. Primary endpoint was a noninferiority assessment of EDSS improvement at four weeks (noninferiority margin of one point), with further key efficacy assessments of number and volume of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+), and new or enlarged T2 lesions at four weeks’ post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability.

Results:

The study achieved the main outcome of noninferiority at four weeks for improved EDSS score. No differences were found between ivMP and oMP in the number of Gd+ lesions (0 (0–1) vs 0 (0–0.5), p = 0.630), volume of Gd+ lesions (0 (0–88.0) vs 0 (0–32.9) mm3, p = 0.735), or new or enlarged T2 lesions (0 (0–194) vs 0 (0–123), p = 0.769). MP was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions:

This study provides confirmatory evidence that oMP is not inferior to ivMP in reducing EDSS, similar in MRI lesions at four weeks for MS relapses and is equally well tolerated and safe.

Trial registration:

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00753792