An audit tool for assessing the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy

ACSC Indicator: testing reliability for hypertension

BACKGROUND

With high-quality community-based primary care, hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) are considered avoidable. The purpose of this study was to test the inter-physician reliability of judgments of avoidable hospitalizations for one ACSC, uncomplicated hypertension, derived from medical chart review.

METHODS

We applied the Canadian Institute for Health Information's case definition to obtain a random sample of patients who had an ACSC hospitalization for uncomplicated hypertension in Calgary, Alberta. Medical chart review was conducted by three experienced internal medicine specialists. Implicit methods were used to judge avoidability of hospitalization using a validated 5-point scale.

RESULTS

There was poor agreement among three physicians raters when judging the avoidability of 82 ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension (κ = 0.092). The κ also remained low when assessing agreement between raters 1 and 3 (κ = 0.092), but the κ was lower (less than chance agreement) for raters 1 and 2 (κ = -0.119) and raters 2 and 3 (κ = -0.008). When the 5-point scale was dichotomized, there was fair agreement among three raters (κ = 0.217). The proportion of ACSC hospitalizations for uncomplicated hypertension that were rated as avoidable was 32.9%, 6.1% and 26.8% for raters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a low proportion of ACSC hospitalization were rated as avoidable, with poor to fair agreement of judgment between physician raters. This suggests that the validity and utility of this health indicator is questionable. It points to a need to abandon the use of ACSC entirely; or alternatively to work on the development of explicit criteria for judging avoidability of hospitalization for ACSC such as hypertension.

Impaired cerebral autoregulation distal to carotid stenosis/occlusion is associated with increased risk of stroke at cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES

Severe carotid stenosis and occlusion are associated with an increased risk of stroke during and after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Relevance of an impaired cerebral autoregulation caused by stenosis/occlusion is unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively assessed the incidence of stroke in relation to severity of carotid disease and corresponding autoregulatory reserve in 2797 patients who had coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients underwent preoperative carotid sonography and, in case of severe extracranial disease, transcranial Doppler sonography with carbon dioxide stimulation to assess cerebrovascular reserve capacity.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven (2.4%) patients had an ischemic stroke, which was fatal in 5. Anterior hemispheric stroke occurred in 42 (1.9%) patients with no/low-grade stenosis, 6 (1.8%) with medium-grade stenosis, 1 (0.6%) with high-grade stenosis/occlusion and normal autoregulation, and 3 (27.3%) with high-grade stenosis/occlusion and exhausted autoregulatory reserve. Increased risk was observed in patients with high-grade stenosis/occlusion and exhausted autoregulatory reserve also after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 28.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-139.1). Stroke risk was not increased in patients with stenosis/occlusion and normal autoregulation (1.5%, adjusted OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebrovascular reserve capacity evaluated by preoperative transcranial Doppler carbon dioxide testing is a major determinant of stroke risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis/occlusion undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Its assessment facilitates identification of patients with an excess perioperative stroke risk.

Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification

Background

Consensus development techniques were used in the late 1980s to create explicit criteria for the appropriateness of cataract extraction. We developed a new appropriateness of indications tool for cataract following the RAND method. We tested the validity of our panel results.

Methods

Criteria were developed using a modified Delphi panel judgment process. A panel of 12 ophthalmologists was assembled. Ratings were analyzed regarding the level of agreement among panelists. We studied the influence of all variables on the final panel score using linear and logistic regression models. The explicit criteria developed were summarized by classification and regression tree analysis.

Results

Of the 765 indications evaluated by the main panel in the second round, 32.9% were found appropriate, 30.1% uncertain, and 37% inappropriate. Agreement was found in 53% of the indications and disagreement in 0.9%. Seven variables were considered to create the indications and divided into three groups: simple cataract, with diabetic retinopathy, or with other ocular pathologies. The preoperative visual acuity in the cataractous eye and visual function were the variables that best explained the panel scoring. The panel results were synthesized and presented in three decision trees. Misclassification error in the decision trees, as compared with the panel original criteria, was 5.3%.

Conclusion

The parameters tested showed acceptable validity for an evaluation tool. These results support the use of this indication algorithm as a screening tool for assessing the appropriateness of cataract extraction in field studies and for the development of practice guidelines.

Statins Are Associated With Better Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Statins have been associated with a reduction in mortality from noncardiac surgery. This study aimed to determine whether statin use on admission to hospital for carotid endarterectomy was associated with a reduction of in-hospital adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Data describing patient characteristics, surgical indication, statin treatment, and in-hospital outcomes of death, ischemic stroke or death and cardiac outcomes were collected from a chart review of all patients (3360) undergoing carotid endarterectomy in Western Canada from January 2000 to December 2001. Outcomes of patients on statins versus those not on statins were compared using logistic regression to account for differences in patient characteristics, and propensity score methods to account for factors influencing patient allocation to statins.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and fifteen of 2031 symptomatic patients and 665 of 1252 asymptomatic patients were on a statin at the time of hospital admission. Statin use by symptomatic patients was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and in-hospital ischemic stroke or death, but not in-hospital cardiac outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 0.25 [CI, 0.07 to 0.90], 0.55 [CI, 0.32 to 0.95], 0.87 [CI, 0.49 to 1.54], respectively). The improvement in outcomes was robust when tested using propensity score matching. This association was not seen in asymptomatic patients on statins (adjusted odds ratio, in-hospital mortality 0.54 [CI, 0.13 to 2.24]; in-hospital ischemic stroke or death 1.34 [CI, 0.61 to 2.93]; in-hospital cardiac outcomes 1.37 [CI, 0.73 to 2.58]).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are suggestive of a protective effect of statin therapy in symptomatic patients pre-treated at the time of carotid endarterectomy, though this needs confirmation in a randomized controlled trial.